咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Effects on Test Performance an... 收藏

Effects on Test Performance and Efficiency of Technology-Enhanced Items: An Analysis of Drag-and-Drop Response Interactions

作     者:Ponce, Hector R. Mayer, Richard E. Soledad Loyola, Maria 

作者机构:Univ Santiago Chile Fac Management & Econ Av LB OHiggins 3363 Santiago Chile Univ Calif Santa Barbara Dept Psychol & Brain Sci Santa Barbara CA 93106 USA Univ Santiago Chile Interact Technol Lab Santiago Chile 

出 版 物:《JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL COMPUTING RESEARCH》 (J. Educ. Comput. Res.)

年 卷 期:2021年第59卷第4期

页      面:713-739页

核心收录:

学科分类:0401[教育学-教育学] 04[教育学] 

基  金:Chilean Agencia Nacional de Investigacion y Desarrollo through grant FONDECYT 

主  题:drag-and-drop interface computer-based assessment online testing technology-enhances items multimedia test developer standardized test 

摘      要:One of the most common technology-enhanced items used in large-scale K-12 testing programs is the drag-and-drop response interaction. The main research questions in this study are: (a) Does adding a drag-and-drop interface to an online test affect the accuracy of student performance? (b) Does adding a drag-and-drop interface to an online test affect the speed of student performance? In three different experiments involving fourth, sixth, and eighth graders, respectively;students answered reading comprehension questions presented in conventional (i.e., paper-based design) or drag-and-drop formats. The tests consisted of four-sentence ordering items in Experiment 1, four graphic organizer items in Experiment 2, and two cloze tests and two graphic organizer items in Experiment 3. The conventional and drag & drop groups were compared on test performance (i.e., accuracy) and efficiency (i.e., response time and number of mouse clicks). Across the three experiments, the conventional and drag & drop groups did not differ in mean performance, but the drag & drop group responded more efficiently than the conventional group (faster response time, d = 0.62, and fewer mouse clicks, d = 1.13).

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分