版权所有:内蒙古大学图书馆 技术提供:维普资讯• 智图
内蒙古自治区呼和浩特市赛罕区大学西街235号 邮编: 010021
作者机构:Tech Univ Munich TUM Munich Sch Robot & Machine Intelligence Chair Robot Sci & Syst Intelligence D-80797 Munich Germany German Aerosp Ctr DLR Inst Robot & Mechatron D-82234 Wessling Germany
出 版 物:《IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS》 (IEEE Robot. Autom.)
年 卷 期:2021年第6卷第3期
页 面:4600-4607页
核心收录:
学科分类:0808[工学-电气工程] 08[工学] 0811[工学-控制科学与工程]
基 金:European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme as part of the project ILIAD European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme as part of the project DARKO Lighthouse Initiative Geriatronics by StMWi Bayern LongLeif GaPa gGmbH
主 题:Robots Safety Robot sensing systems Springs Torque Trajectory Optimal control Compliant joints and mechanisms methods and tools for robot system design human-centered robotics physical human-robot interaction robot safety
摘 要:Like humans or animals, robots with compliant joints are capable of performing explosive or cyclic motions by making systematic use of energy storage and release, and it has been shown that they can outperform their rigid counterparts in terms of peak velocity. For rigid joint robots, there exist well-established, computationally inexpensive tools to compute the maximum achievable Cartesian endpoint velocity, which is an important performance and safety characteristic for robot designs. For elastic joint robots, optimal control is usually employed to determine the maximum possible link velocity together with the associated trajectory, which is time consuming and computationally costly for most systems. In this letter, we propose methods to obtain estimates of the maximum achievable Cartesian endpoint velocities of gravity-free elastic joint robots that have computational requirements close to the rigid joint robot case. We formulate an optimal control problem to verify the methods and provide results for a planar 3R robot. Furthermore, we compare the results of our approach with those from real-world throwing experiments which were previously conducted on the elastic DLR David system. Finally, we apply the methods to derive and quantitatively compare the safety properties of DLR David and a hypothetically rigid version of this robot in terms of the Safety Map framework proposed in our previous work.