咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Implementation of a selective ... 收藏

Implementation of a selective mean filter algorithm to reduce noise in computed radiography images

作     者:J. H. Saragih C. Anam W. S. Budi T. I. Simarmata G. Dougherty 

作者机构:1Postgraduate Program Department of Physics Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics Diponegoro University Jl. Prof. Soedarto SH Tembalang Semarang 50275 Central Java Indonesia 2Department of Physics Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics Diponegoro University Jl. Prof. Soedarto SH Tembalang Semarang 50275 Central Java Indonesia 3Department of Radiology Premier Jatinegara Hospital Jl. Jatinegara Timur No. 85-87 Jatinegara Kota Jakarta Timur 13310 DKI Jakarta Indonesia 4Department of Applied Physics and Medical Imaging California State University Channel Islands Camarillo CA 93012 USA 

出 版 物:《AIP Conference Proceedings》 

年 卷 期:2021年第2346卷第1期

学科分类:07[理学] 0702[理学-物理学] 

摘      要:This study implements a selective mean filter (SMF) and determines its effectiveness on computed radiography (CR) images. A phantom of the Kualitas Citra Imajing (KUCING) was used. The effectiveness of the SMF was compared to the adaptive mean filter (AMF). The assessment of image quality was based on several parameters, such as the peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR), mean squared error (MSE), structural similarity index (SSIM), contrast consistency (CV), contrast linearity (CL), and modulation transfer function (MTF). The results show that the PSNR value generated by the SMF is higher than with the AMF. The MSE value generated by the SMF algorithm is lower than AMF. The SSIM values showed that SMF algorithm produces a better image similarity between the original image and the filtered image compared to the AMF algorithm. In consistency and linearity, the AMF leads to significant changes from the original image, while the SMF image is closer to the original image. The 10% MTF generated by the SMF is the same as the original image, while AMF produces a significant decrease in the 10% MTF. The SMF took 17.9 ± 0.7 seconds for denoising one CR image, while AMF took 519 ± 5 seconds. SMF decreases image noise without a significant effect on the spatial resolution of the image. SMF filtering is superior to AMF filtering in terms of spatial resolution and a shorter computational time.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分