咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Confounder selection strategie... 收藏
arXiv

Confounder selection strategies targeting stable treatment effect estimators

作     者:Loh, Wen Wei Vansteelandt, Stijn 

作者机构:Department of Data Analysis Ghent University Gent Belgium Department of Applied Mathematics Computer Science and Statistics Ghent University Ghent Belgium Department of Medical Statistics London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine United Kingdom 

出 版 物:《arXiv》 (arXiv)

年 卷 期:2020年

核心收录:

主  题:Sampling 

摘      要:Inferring the causal effect of a treatment on an outcome in an observational study requires adjusting for observed baseline confounders to avoid bias. However, adjusting for all observed baseline covariates, when only a subset are confounders of the effect of interest, is known to yield potentially inefficient and unstable estimators of the treatment effect. Furthermore, it raises the risk of finite-sample bias and bias due to model misspecification. For these stated reasons, confounder (or covariate) selection is commonly used to determine a subset of the available covariates that is sufficient for confounding adjustment. In this article, we propose a confounder selection strategy that focuses on stable estimation of the treatment effect. In particular, when the propensity score model already includes covariates that are sufficient to adjust for confounding, then the addition of covariates that are associated with either treatment or outcome alone, but not both, should not systematically change the effect estimator. The proposal, therefore, entails first prioritizing covariates for inclusion in the propensity score model, then using a change-in-estimate approach to select the smallest adjustment set that yields a stable effect estimate. The ability of the proposal to correctly select confounders, and to ensure valid inference of the treatment effect following data-driven covariate selection, is assessed empirically and compared with existing methods using simulation studies. We demonstrate the procedure using three different publicly available datasets commonly used for causal inference. Copyright © 2020, The Authors. All rights reserved.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分