咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Investigating the Impact of Ba... 收藏
arXiv

Investigating the Impact of Backward Strategy Learning in a Logic Tutor: Aiding Subgoal Learning towards Improved Problem Solving

作     者:Shabrina, Preya Mostafavi, Behrooz Abdelshiheed, Mark Chi, Min Barnes, Tiffany 

作者机构:Computer Science North Carolina State University RaleighNC27695 United States 

出 版 物:《arXiv》 (arXiv)

年 卷 期:2022年

核心收录:

主  题:Students 

摘      要:Learning to derive subgoals reduces the gap between experts and students and makes students prepared for future problem solving. Researchers have explored subgoal labeled instructional materials with explanations in traditional problem solving and within tutoring systems to help novices learn to subgoal. However, only a little research is found on problem-solving strategies in relationship with subgoal learning. Also, these strategies are under-explored within computer-based tutors and learning environments. Backward problem-solving strategy is closely related to the process of subgoaling, where problem solving iteratively refines the goal into a new subgoal to reduce difficulty. In this paper, we explore a training strategy for backward strategy learning within an intelligent logic tutor that teaches logic proof construction. The training session involved backward worked examples (BWE) and problem-solving (BPS) to help students learn backward strategy towards improving their subgoaling and problem-solving skills. To evaluate the training strategy, we analyzed students’ 1) experience with and engagement in learning backward strategy, 2) performance, and 3) proof construction approaches in new problems that they solved independently without tutor help after each level of training and in post-test. Our results showed that, when new problems were given to solve without any tutor help, students who were trained with both BWE and BPS outperformed students who received none of the treatment or only BWE during training. Additionally, students trained with both BWE and BPS derived subgoals during proof construction with significantly higher efficiency than the other two groups. Copyright © 2022, The Authors. All rights reserved.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分