咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Reusing Egyptian in-situ const... 收藏

Reusing Egyptian in-situ construction &demolition waste(CDW)to produce sustainable *** of compressive &bond strengths using steel & glass fiber reinforced polymer(GFRP)rebars

作     者:Hassan, Hassan A. Moghazy, Mohamed El. El-Tehawy, Essam 

作者机构:Construction and Building Department College of Engineering Arab Academy for Science and Technology Cairo Egypt 

出 版 物:《HBRC Journal》 (HBRC J.)

年 卷 期:2024年第20卷第1期

页      面:301-316页

核心收录:

基  金:The authors extend their sincere thanks to the Department of Construction and Building  especially the Materials Testing Laboratory  College of Engineering and Technology  Arab Academy for Science and Technology  Cairo  Egypt  for providing the opportunity to carry out all tests in the laboratory 

主  题:Steel fibers 

摘      要:This research paper presents the effect of using recycled concrete aggregate (RCA), from the Egyptian construction waste, in different proportions on the bond performance between concrete and its internal reinforcement, where two types of reinforcement were used: a- steel reinforcing bars, and b- glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars. 72 samples of concrete were prepared and tested with replacement ratios for natural aggregate (NA) with RCA: 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 %. The samples were divided into 150 mm cubes to conduct axial compression tests, and pull-out samples to investigate the effect of replacement ratios on the bond between concrete with steel and GFRP rebars. Results showed that concrete loses 26% of its compressive strength after replacing NA with 100% RCA. The results of the pull-out test for steel samples showed 30% higher bonding than GFRP samples. A slight decrease in bond was observed between the control and the tested samples, where the steel and GFRP samples showed a decrease of 5% and 9%, respectively, over the control samples for each, at a replacement percentage of 100%. It was also clear that the steel reinforcement bars had a stronger bond with the concrete, and this can be attributed to the stronger mechanical interlocking of the steel ribs than their counterparts in the GFRP. Failure patterns showed the crushing of concrete with steel bars, in contrast to the GFRP bars, which showed slipping from within the concrete with failure of the ribs in many samples. © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分