版权所有:内蒙古大学图书馆 技术提供:维普资讯• 智图
内蒙古自治区呼和浩特市赛罕区大学西街235号 邮编: 010021
作者机构:AUSL Romagna Med Phys Unit Ravenna Italy Fdn IRCCS CaGranda Osped Maggiore Policlin Pediat Phys Med & Rehabil Unit Milan Italy ASL2 Savona Med Phys Unit Savona Italy Univ Bologna Med Phys Specializat Sch Bologna Italy ASL CN1 Cuneo Med Phys Unit Cuneo Italy Citta Salute & Sci Med Phys Unit Turin Italy Azienda USL Modena Med Phys Unit I-44124 Ferrara Italy Azienda AUSL IRCCS Reggio Emilia Med Phys Unit Reggio Emilia Italy AOUI VR Med Phys Unit Verona Italy Azienda USL Bologna Med Phys Unit Bologna Italy Osped Cattinara Med Phys Unit Trieste Italy Azienda USL Toscana Ctr Med Phys Unit Firenze Empoli Italy AOU Maggiore Car Med Phys Unit I-28100 Novara Italy IRCCS Osped San Raffaele Grp San Donato Med Phys Unit Milan Italy IRCCS Fdn Policlin San Matteo Med Phys Unit Pavia Italy USL Toscana Sud Est Med Phys Unit Siena Grosseto Italy Osped Niguarda Ca Granda Med Phys Unit Milan Italy Med Phys Unit ULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana Treviso Italy IRCCS European Inst Oncol IEO Milan Italy ASL Pescara Med Phys Unit Pescara Italy ASL Cagliari Med Phys Unit Cagliari Italy Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina Gemelli Isola Med Phys Unit Rome Italy Azienda Toscana Nord Ovest Med Phys Unit Lucca Italy Studio Associato Fisici Sanit Med Phys Unit Lugo Italy Osped Civ Carrara Med Phys Unit Carrara Italy PO Dimiccoli ASL BT Med Phys Unit Barletta Italy ASL AT Osped Cardinal Massai Med Phys Unit Asti Italy Azienda Osped Santa Croce & Carle Osped Santa Croce Med Phys Unit Cuneo Italy ASL3 Sistema Sanitario Reg Liguria Med Phys Unit Genoa Italy ASST Santi Paolo & Carlo Presidio San Paolo Med Phys Unit Milan Italy ASST Monza Med Phys Unit Monza Italy
出 版 物:《PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS》 (Phys. Med.)
年 卷 期:2025年第130卷
页 面:104907-104907页
核心收录:
主 题:Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Image quality Quality control Mammography
摘 要:Purpose: Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) is an advanced mammography technique for which there are currently no internationally agreed methods and reference values for image quality assessment. The aim of this multicentre study was to evaluate a simple method to assess the technical image quality of reconstructed and synthetic 2D (SM) images of different models of DBT systems using commercially available phantoms. Methods: The signal difference to noise ratio (SDNR) was chosen as an index of technical image quality and was evaluated for three commercial phantoms, Tomophan, Tormam and CIRS model 015, on 55 DBT systems (six vendors, nine models). Results: SDNR was found to depend on several factors: detail size, average glandular dose (AGD), reconstruction algorithm, software version and applied post-processing. In particular, an increase in SDNR was observed with increasing detail size, AGD, as well as with the use of contrast-enhanced post-processing and iterative reconstruction algorithms. Most systems showed higher SDNR values in SM images respect to DBT for the largest details and a decrease for smaller details. Conclusions: This study proposes a straightforward method to assess the technical image quality of reconstructed clinical breast structures. However this method could be used to establish reference values for technical image over time.