版权所有:内蒙古大学图书馆 技术提供:维普资讯• 智图
内蒙古自治区呼和浩特市赛罕区大学西街235号 邮编: 010021
作者机构:Univ Louisiana Lafayette 104 E Univ Circle Lafayette LA 70504 USA Texas Christian Univ Ft Worth TX 76129 USA ABT Associates Inc Cambridge MA 02138 USA Univ Nevada Reno NV 89557 USA Friends Res Inst Inc Baltimore MD USA George Mason Univ Fairfax VA 22030 USA
出 版 物:《QUALITY & QUANTITY》 (质与量)
年 卷 期:2018年第52卷第2期
页 面:815-828页
核心收录:
学科分类:0303[法学-社会学] 03[法学] 0714[理学-统计学(可授理学、经济学学位)]
基 金:U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIH/NIDA) Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Bureau of Justice Assistance, U.S. Department of Justice NIDA Coordinating Center, AMAR International, Inc Research Centers participating in CJ-DATS Arizona State University [U01DA025307] Maricopa County Adult Probation [U01DA025307] University of Connecticut [U01DA016194] Connecticut Department of Correction [U01DA016194] University of Delaware [U01DA016230] Delaware Department of Corrections [U01DA016230] Friends Research Institute [U01DA025233] Maryland Department of Public Safety Correctional Services' Division of Parole and Probation [U01DA025233] University of Kentucky [U01DA016205] Kentucky Department of Corrections [U01DA016205] National Development and Research Institutes, Inc. [U01DA016200] Colorado Department of Corrections [U01DA016200] University of Rhode Island [U01DA016191] Rhode Island Hospital [U01DA016191] Rhode Island Department of Corrections [U01DA016191] Texas Christian University [U01DA016190] Illinois Department of Corrections [U01DA016190] Temple University Pennsylvania Department of Corrections [U01DA025284] University of California at Los Angeles [U01DA016211] Washington State Department of Corrections [U01DA016211]
主 题:Qualitative research Procedural rigor Team building Inter-coder reliability Multisite research
摘 要:Despite attention to technical aspects of conducting qualitative research, few studies describe procedures for managing pre-analysis activities in large-scale multisite qualitative projects. As part of the data collection for the Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies, a national multisite research cooperative with nine research centers (RCs) conducted 700 semi-structured interviews to evaluate interorganizational strategies in three protocols focused on improving addiction- and health related service delivery in criminal justice settings. Guided by the research cooperative, RCs collaborated on many aspects of the qualitative data activities (e.g., codebook development and coding activities), however, pre-analysis procedures, such as organizing and managing resources, were primarily managed at the RC level. The present study examines these various practices and describes two exemplary approaches to pre-analysis, with emphasis on lessons learned and recommendations for coordinating resources, managing data, and maintaining fidelity to the study procedures for large-scale qualitative projects.