咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >COMPARISON OF ROUTING ALGORITH... 收藏

COMPARISON OF ROUTING ALGORITHMS FOR STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL MECHANISM IN CYLINDRICAL AS/RS

为在圆柱的 AS/RS 的存储和检索机制的路由算法的比较

作     者:Janilionis, Vytautas V. Bazaras, Zilvinas Janilionis, Vytautas 

作者机构:[a] Dept of Transport Engineering Kaunas University of Technology Kaunas Lithuania[b] Dept of Applied Mathematics Kaunas University of Technology Lithuania 

出 版 物:《TRANSPORT》 (运输)

年 卷 期:2016年第31卷第1期

页      面:11-21页

核心收录:

学科分类:12[管理学] 0202[经济学-应用经济学] 02[经济学] 1201[管理学-管理科学与工程(可授管理学、工学学位)] 020205[经济学-产业经济学] 08[工学] 082303[工学-交通运输规划与管理] 0823[工学-交通运输工程] 

基  金:European Social Fund  ESF 

主  题:cylindrical automated storage and retrieval system routing algorithm branch and bound algorithm automated warehouse simulation regression analysis 

摘      要:The objective of this research is to propose new routing algorithms for the Storage and Retrieval Mechanism (SRM) in the Cylindrical Automated Storage and Retrieval System (C-AS/RS) and contribute to the system conceptualization by investigating the maximum achievable retrieval request rates for different routing algorithms and system parameters. For this purpose, flexible and detailed simulation model was developed and investigated for 2 SRM types, 3 routing algorithms and a feasible set of system movement and load transfer time parameters. Based on the simulation output, the regression models for different SRM types and routing algorithms were developed for predicting the maximum retrieval request rate. The differences of the average maximum retrieval request rate were evaluated for various system configurations and routing algorithms. The alternative to optimal routing algorithm was proposed, reducing the system performance only by 1.4?÷?2.4% on average, but requiring significantly less calculations when planning the SRM tour. In addition, the system analysis indicated that SRM vertical velocity and load transfer time have the highest impact on the system performance and for different SRM types the average maximum retrieval request rates differ by 22.2?÷?31.8%.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分