咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Equivalence between enhanced a... 收藏

Equivalence between enhanced assumed strain method and assumed stress hybrid method based on the Hellinger-Reissner principle

在提高的假定紧张方法和假定压力混血儿方法之间的等价基于 HELLINGERREISSNER 原则

作     者:Yeo, ST Lee, BC 

作者机构:Engineering System and Design Lab Department of Mechanical Engineering Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology 373-1 Kusong-dong Yusung-gu Taejon 305-701 Korea [*]Engineering System and Design Lab Department of Mechanical Engineering Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology 373-1 Kusong-dong Yusung-gu Taejon 305-701 Korea 

出 版 物:《INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING》 (国际工程数值法杂志)

年 卷 期:1996年第39卷第18期

页      面:3083-3099页

核心收录:

学科分类:08[工学] 0701[理学-数学] 

主  题:EAS-method hybrid-method equivalence stress recovery 

摘      要:An equivalence between the enhanced assumed strain (EAS) method based on the Hu-Washizu principle, recently proposed by Simo and Rifai, and assumed stress hybrid (hybrid) method based on the Hellinger-Reissner principle is investigated. It is proved that not only the displacements but also the stresses of the EAS-elements calculated from the strains are identical to those of the corresponding hybrid-elements at least at the Gauss integration points provided the spaces of the trial functions for enhanced assumed strains and for assumed stresses satisfy the orthogonality and the inclusion or the invertibility condition. By virtue of this equivalence, a stress recovery procedure of the EAS-elements is devised. This procedure is variationally consistent and more efficient than those proposed by Simo and Rifai and Andelfinger and Ramm. Since the classical method of incompatible displacement modes is a special case of the EAS-method, this procedure also can be used to evaluate variationally consistent stresses for the non-conforming elements.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分