Objectives: To review the high quality US evidence on performance of managed health care organisations and the available US evidence on specific managed care techniques;namely, financial incentives, utilisation manage...
详细信息
Objectives: To review the high quality US evidence on performance of managed health care organisations and the available US evidence on specific managed care techniques;namely, financial incentives, utilisation management and review, physician profiling and disease management. Methods: Literature searches were conducted using numerous databases including Medline, Embase, the Social Sciences Citation Index and the National Health Service (NHS) Centre for Reviews and Dissemination library. For inclusion of evaluations of overall performance, studies had to use a comparison group (typically fee-for-service patients), make appropriate statistical adjustments for differences between groups, and be published in a peer-reviewed journal from 1980 forward. For assessments of techniques, less-demanding inclusion criteria reflected the paucity of generalisable literature;however, more current results were required (1990 forward). Results: We identified 70 articles for systematic review, covering 18 dimensions of performance (e.g. utilisation, quality of care, consumer satisfaction, equity). The strength of the evidence varied by dimension. It was strongest for utilisation and quality. In general, managed care seems to reduce hospitalisation and use of high-cost discretionary services, to increase preventive screening, and to be neutral in terms of patient outcomes. As for specific techniques, we identified 19 articles for review, but limitations of these studies prevented our drawing any definite conclusions about techniques' effectiveness. This is an important, if somewhat negative, conclusion. Conclusions: Applying US evidence is complicated by an irrelevant comparator and a higher baseline of utilisation. Managed care brought Americans the familiar NHS practices of population-based health care and resource management through gatekeeping;hence, changes due to UK adoption of managed care techniques may be modest. US evidence should be used to generate hypotheses, not to predi
In order to discover and correct inaccurate payments received from insurance companies, a practice requires a plan for the systematic, efficient, and prompt monitoring of receipts. When any such discrepancies are dete...
详细信息
In order to discover and correct inaccurate payments received from insurance companies, a practice requires a plan for the systematic, efficient, and prompt monitoring of receipts. When any such discrepancies are detected, the physician can query the insurance company and correct the problem. Once the system is in place, it behooves each physician to look at the results at least weekly. Monitoring receipts requires interest, know-how, and persistence in the face of ever-confusing payment methodologies. This paper explains one such plan for detecting and correcting inaccurate insurance company payments.
暂无评论