最高人民法院结合审判实际需要,逐步推进民事诉讼程序繁简分流改革试点工作,简易程序作为民事诉讼制度中解决案件的程序之一,是民事案件繁简分流的路径选择之一,现在人民群众已经逐步抛弃厌诉的心态,转而使用司法途径去解决纠纷,这就对当今的民事审判各个过程提出了新的挑战。本文除引言和结语外,共有三个部分。第一部分阐述民事简易程序概念和民事繁简分流改革的背景,从而理解民事简易程序繁简分流的意义及价值。第二部分,通过分析民事简易程序繁简分流改革试点的现状,找出问题所在,并在出现的现有问题基础上进一步研究问题本质,畅通繁简分流道路。第三部分,通过探讨第二部分所存在的问题,如司法人才队伍、程序衔接问题等提出相应对策。最后的目的是让合乎理性的法律规范来缓解案多人少的矛盾,从而让人民群众感受到司法公正。In light of the actual needs of trials, the Supreme People’s Court has gradually promoted the pilot reform of diverting complicated and simplified civil litigation procedures. Summary procedure, as one of the procedures to solve cases in the civil litigation system, is one of the ways to choose the complicated and simplified civil cases. Now people have gradually abandoned the mentality of hating litigation and turned to the judicial way to solve disputes, which has put forward new challenges to the various processes of civil trial. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, there are three parts in this paper. The first part expounds the concept of civil summary procedure and the background of the reform of civil summary procedure, so as to understand the significance and value of civil summary procedure. The second part, through analyzing the current situation of the civil simple procedure reform pilot, finds out the problem, and further studies the essence of the problem on the basis of existing problems, smoothing the road of complicated and simple diversion. The third part, through the discussion of the second part of the existing problems, such as the judicial talent team, procedural cohesion problems and so on put forward the corresponding countermeasures. The final purpose is to make rational legal norms to alleviate the contradiction of the small number of cases, so that the people feel judicial justice.
暂无评论