Incorporating writing into an economics course is a beneficial goal of economic educators. The potential benefits of using writing to enhance learning among economics students have been emphasized in the literature. W...
详细信息
Incorporating writing into an economics course is a beneficial goal of economic educators. The potential benefits of using writing to enhance learning among economics students have been emphasized in the literature. writing to learn (WTL) is an act of using writing activities to help students think through key concepts presented in a course. The authors' objective in this article is to describe WTL activities that promote engagement, peer-to-peer learning, and active listening. This WTL strategy was born out of a desire to help students focus and learn in an online format during a particularly stressful time of the COVID-19 global pandemic. However, this strategy can be applied in all teaching formats: face-to-face, online or hybrid, and to both graduate and undergraduate students.
Despite research demonstrating positive effects of writing on student achievement, writing-to-learn remains under-utilised in mathematics and mathematics teacher education. In this paper, we explore how writing-to-lea...
详细信息
Despite research demonstrating positive effects of writing on student achievement, writing-to-learn remains under-utilised in mathematics and mathematics teacher education. In this paper, we explore how writing-to-learn tasks in a mathematics methods course influenced elementary preservice teachers' beliefs about teaching in two domains: mathematics and writing. Preservice teachers engaged in weekly writing-to-learn tasks designed to support their understanding of mathematics content and mathematics pedagogy over the course of a semester. Using survey data, we found no significant difference in their beliefs from pre to post. Such null findings led us to ask new qualitative questions, resulting in a concurrent mixed methods design. Through qualitative analyses of student writing, we found several meaningful and non-meaningful practices for engaging in writing-to-learn tasks. This research supports teacher educators, teachers, and researchers to understand how to implement writing-to-learn tasks and to support students towards meaningful engagement in the tasks.
As a pedagogical strategy, writing-to-learn uses writing to improve students' understanding of course content, but most existing writing feedback systems focus on improving students' writing skills rather than...
详细信息
As a pedagogical strategy, writing-to-learn uses writing to improve students' understanding of course content, but most existing writing feedback systems focus on improving students' writing skills rather than their conceptual development. In this article, we propose an automatic approach to generate individualized feedback based on comparing knowledge representations extracted from lecture slides and individual students' writing assignments. The novelty of our approach lies in the feedback generation: to help students assimilate new knowledge into their existing knowledge better, their current knowledge is modeled as a set of matching concepts, and suggested concepts and concept relationships for inclusion are generated as feedback by combing two factors: importance and relevance of feedback candidates to the matching concepts in the domain knowledge. A total of 88 students were recruited to participate in a repeated measures study. Results show that most participants felt the feedback they received was relevant (78.4%), easy to understand (82.9%), accurate (76.1%) and useful (79.5%);they also felt that the proposed system made it easier to study course concepts (80.7%) and was useful in learning course concepts (77.3%). Analyses of students' submitted assignments reveal that more course concepts and concept relationships were included when they used the proposed system.
We contacted a random sample of 900 elementary teachers (grades K-5) in the United States to inquire about their use of writing to support students' learning of classroom content or concepts. Characteristics (i.e....
详细信息
We contacted a random sample of 900 elementary teachers (grades K-5) in the United States to inquire about their use of writing to support students' learning of classroom content or concepts. Characteristics (i.e., grade level, public v. private school, school locale, school enrollment) of the 150 teachers who responded to our survey were not statistically different from the entire sample surveyed. More than two-thirds (67%) of responding teachers reported receiving minimal to no college preparation on how to use writing to support their students' learning. Although at least one-half reported using 30 of the 50 writing-to-learn activities included on the survey in at least one subject area, there were subject area differences. Teachers reported using a significantly greater number of writing-to-learn activities in English/language Arts (ELA) than in math, science, or social studies classes (all p < .001) and a significantly greater number of writing-to-learn activities in science compared to math (p < .01). The most commonly reported writing-to-learn activities involved little writing and little critical thinking or analysis. We further found that increases in teachers' grade level and educational level were associated with increased use of writing-to-learn activities in all subject areas. Teachers' beliefs about the use of writing to support learning in different subject areas was a significant predictor (p < .01) of their use of writing-to-learn activities in math and social studies, while their perceptions of having the skills and resources to use writing-to-learn predicted their increased use of writing activities in ELA and math (p < .05). Finally, we found that teachers commonly used best practices to directly teach their students to use writing-to-learn strategies. We discuss implications of our findings for both pre-service and in-service teacher preparation as well as classroom practice.
Logistical challenges in large enrollment classes are often mentioned as obstacles to active learning. writing is an integral part of being a scientist and is often one of the first tools considered by STEM instructor...
详细信息
Logistical challenges in large enrollment classes are often mentioned as obstacles to active learning. writing is an integral part of being a scientist and is often one of the first tools considered by STEM instructors to increase student engagement, but iterative writing assignments in large classes require creativity on the part of the instructor. We found an association between writing-to-learn assignments designed to be consistent with inclusive learning pedagogies and student performance measures in a large enrollment undergraduate biology course. They provide ample opportunity for deliberate practice and inclusive engagement, components of the "heads and hearts" hypothesis posed to explain the variation in active learning impacts on the performance of minoritized students.
Formative feedback has long been recognized as a crucial scaffold for student learning. Due to the job demand of instructors, it is impossible for them to provide individual students with on-demand formative feedback ...
详细信息
ISBN:
(纸本)9781450368049
Formative feedback has long been recognized as a crucial scaffold for student learning. Due to the job demand of instructors, it is impossible for them to provide individual students with on-demand formative feedback based on individual students' performance. There is a growing interest in developing better approaches to provide students with automated formative feedback to assist their learning. In this research, we design and develop an automated formative feedback system to support student learning of conceptual knowledge in the course of writing assignments. In the proposed system, formative feedback can be generated automatically with the help of concept maps constructed from instructors' lecture slides and students' writing assignments. In this paper, we present the automatic approach to generate formative feedback, discuss the system architecture, and illustrate a prototype of the proposed system.
The purpose of this qualitative case study was to document and explore high school math and science teachers' beliefs and instructional practices concerning writing-to-learn (WTL), or students learning content thr...
详细信息
The purpose of this qualitative case study was to document and explore high school math and science teachers' beliefs and instructional practices concerning writing-to-learn (WTL), or students learning content through writing. Two theories guided this study: Bandura's (1977) theory of self-efficacy and Vygotsky's (1978) sociocultural theory. Data collection included interviews with 10 participants: five math teachers and five science teachers, a focus group comprised of three math teachers and four science teachers from the sample, and participants' journal responses for four weeks. The setting for this study was in an urban high school in the southeastern United States. The student population was approximately 700 students in Grades 6-12, and the school offered a diverse curriculum including health sciences, engineering, and advanced placement courses with an emphasis on preparation for college and career. The four questions to guide this research were: (a) What are math and science teacher's beliefs of their capabilities to teach and use WTL? (b) How do math and science teachers describe themselves as teachers of WTL? (c) What are math and science teachers' beliefs on the effectiveness of writing to support learning? (d) What are the math and science teachers' instructional support needs from the state department of education, administration, and the school district for implementing writing in their classrooms? From the data analysis, five recurring themes emerged from the data analysis: belief about the effectiveness of using WTL, general beliefs about WTL, self-perception as a WTL teacher, belief in the ability to use WTL, and need for support to use WTL. These themes were consistent with relevant literature regarding math and science teacher self-efficacious beliefs about using writing as a tool for learning content.
In this workshop, participants will learn about writing as a tool to support learning through inquiry. They will design at least one writing-to-learn assignment that supports a course topic or student outcome in their...
详细信息
ISBN:
(纸本)9781538658574
In this workshop, participants will learn about writing as a tool to support learning through inquiry. They will design at least one writing-to-learn assignment that supports a course topic or student outcome in their courses, including instructions to students, and a rubric for evaluation.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of using the Science writing Heuristic (SWH) as an instructional tool to improve academic achievement and writing in the context of scientific literacy. T...
详细信息
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of using the Science writing Heuristic (SWH) as an instructional tool to improve academic achievement and writing in the context of scientific literacy. This quasi-experimental study compared the effects of using the SWH in five laboratory settings over a 16-week span. The SWH was administered to a treatment group (n=63), whereas the comparison group (n=67) received laboratory sessions using a traditional laboratory report format. There were four classes (n=130) of general chemistry enrolled in the study with two teachers. Each teacher taught a treatment and comparison class during the study. A pretest was administered to investigate any between-group mean differences. There was no statistically significant difference in between-group mean differences. The dependent measures administered to investigate differences between the treatment and comparison group included five SWH laboratory scores, a posttest content assessment (CA), a posttest written assessment (WA), and a student perceptions questionnaire. Teacher interviews were conducted as anecdotal evidence of teachers' opinions about the use of the SWH compared with a traditional laboratory format. The means on the CA and the WA were higher in the treatment group than the comparison group. Two independent-samples t tests were conducted to compare the means of the CA and the WA by treatment and comparison groups. Ten paired-samples t tests were used to make planned pairwise comparisons between the laboratory scores. There were five statistically significant differences in laboratory scores; however, there was no clear linear trend of an increase in means over time. There were no statistically significant differences in the posttest CA or posttest WA. There was a statistically significant difference in one of the student-perceptions- questionnaire components focused on writing as a tool for learning chemistry. The results favored the traditional laborato
Our study examined whether brief writing-to-learn assignments linked to lower and higher levels in Bloom's taxonomy affected performance differentially on examination performance in assessing these skill levels. U...
详细信息
Our study examined whether brief writing-to-learn assignments linked to lower and higher levels in Bloom's taxonomy affected performance differentially on examination performance in assessing these skill levels. Using a quasi-random design, 91 undergraduate students in an introductory psychology class completed eight lower level and eight higher level writing assignments. We based both higher and lower level writing assignments on the same concepts drawn from chapters of the accompanying textbook but which differed in level of cognitive complexity. The results favored a top-down approach by showing that higher level writing assignments produced significantly better performance on both lower and higher level exam questions derived from concepts students had written about.
暂无评论