Objectives This study aim to evaluate patient’s perception about anesthesiologists’ job roles and investigate their expectations for anesthesia *** We designed a self-administered questionnaire for this cross-sectio...
详细信息
Objectives This study aim to evaluate patient’s perception about anesthesiologists’ job roles and investigate their expectations for anesthesia *** We designed a self-administered questionnaire for this cross-sectional survey study and delivered questionnaire forms to adult in-patients who were scheduled for elective surgery before pre-operative anesthetic visit the day before *** collected information of respondents’ demographic data,education background,health literacy and previous experience of anesthesia,perception of anesthesiologist’s job,the expectation on anesthesia *** analyses,χ^2 test and multiple linear regression analysis were used for data *** Of 550 participants,521(94.7%)completed the *** these respondents,335 (64.3%) considered anesthesiology as an independent medical discipline,225 (43.2%) believed that anesthesiology department was an independent clinical department,and 243 (46.6%) recognized anesthesiologists as qualified *** 21.5% of them knew that anesthesiologists also work in the intensive care unit and 26.9% of them knew that anesthesiologists also work in pain clinic as *** patients (β=-0.044,P<0.001),those with higher education (β=1.200,P<0.001),or with better health literacy (β=0.781,P=0.005) had significant more knowledge about the job roles of *** patients demanded pre-anesthetic visit (80.5%),expected availability of preoperative anesthetic clinic (74.1%),wished to receive more information about anesthesia (91.3%) and anesthesiologist (77.4%).Conclusions Patients’ perception about anesthesiologists might be *** should be made on education about anesthesia,especially for elderly patients and those under-educated *** anesthetic clinic is expected by most in-patients.
Objective Identification of the risk factors for extraordinary hidden blood loss(HBL) could clarify the underlying causes and provide more appropriate management. This study aims to identify the predictors of HBL in s...
详细信息
Objective Identification of the risk factors for extraordinary hidden blood loss(HBL) could clarify the underlying causes and provide more appropriate management. This study aims to identify the predictors of HBL in spinal *** Medical records were retrospectively retrieved to collect the data of patients who undergoing posterior thoracic and lumbar fusion surgery or scoliosis surgery. Demographic information, perioperative visible blood loss volume, as well as laboratory results were recorded. The patients receiving fusion surgery or scoliosis surgery were further divided into the HBL positive subgroup and the HBL negative subgroup. Differences in the variables between the groups were then analyzed. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent risk factors associated with *** For patients undergoing posterior spinal surgery, the independent risk factors associated with HBL were autologous transfusion(for fusion surgery P = 0.011, OR: 2.627, 95%CI: 1.574-2.782; for scoliosis surgery P < 0.001, OR: 2.268, 95%CI: 2.143-2.504) and allogeneic transfusion(for fusion surgery P < 0.001, OR: 6.487, 95%CI: 2.349-17.915; for scoliosis surgery P < 0.001, OR: 3.636, 95%CI: 2.389-5.231).Conclusion Intraoperative blood transfusion might be an early-warning indicator for perioperative HBL.
目的 分析椎体强化联合局部神经阻滞治疗椎体压缩骨折远处疼痛的治疗效果。方法 对2016年1月至2016年12月北京协和医院骨科收治的41例骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折伴远处疼痛患者进行回顾性分析,其中女性35例,男性6例,患者平均年龄(74.15±2.62)岁。所有患者均进行椎体后凸成形术,按术后有无进行椎旁神经阻滞及竖脊肌局部麻醉分为两组,其中A组(19例)术中或术后予以椎旁神经阻滞或竖脊肌局部麻醉,B组(22例)未予椎旁神经阻滞或竖脊肌局部麻醉干预。每例患者分别于术后2周、术后3个月进行随访,手术前、后均拍摄胸(腰)椎体正侧位X线片并测量相关指标。采用视觉模拟量评(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分及Oswestry功能障碍指数(oswestry disability index, ODI)评分评估手术和神经阻滞干预的效果。结果 所有患者术后临床症状均得到有效的缓解,予以椎旁神经阻滞或竖脊肌局部麻醉患者的手术时间与未予封闭治疗的手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义[(42.74±5.03)min vs.(40.59±7.21)min, P = 0.906),A组术后第1天VAS及ODI评分较B组明显减低(VAS:1.63±0.60 vs. 2.68±0.78, P <0.001;ODI:19.05±6.27 vs. 27.18±8.09, P =0.001),A组与B组术后2周VAS比较差异无统计学意义(2.32±0.48 vs. 2.55±0.67, P >0.05),A组术后2周ODI评分低于B组(21.79±4.70 vs. 25.73±6.30, P =0.043)。A组与B组术后3个月VAS差异有统计学意义(2.00±0.58 vs. 2.59±0.67, P =0.007),术后3个月ODI评分差异无统计学意义( P >0.05)。随访期间两组患者均未出现伤口感染或出血的并发症。结论 对伴有责任椎体远处疼痛的椎体压缩骨折患者,手术前后进行椎旁神经阻滞或竖脊肌局部麻醉并未增加手术风险和手术时间,且可有效缓解患者术后短期局部疼痛,值得临床推广。
目的评估3种垂体瘤患者经鼻蝶切除术后苏醒期躁动及恢复质量。方法选择2016年3月至11月全麻下行择期切除垂体瘤患者,分为3组:生长激素组(GH)、促肾上腺皮质激素组(ACTH)和无功能组(control)。在恢复室应用Riker镇静躁动评分(RSAS)记录苏醒期患者的躁动情况,患者带管呛咳的严重程度,头痛评分(VAS评分)。术后24 h随访记录40项恢复质量评分量表(QoR-40),患者头痛(VAS评分),恶心呕吐(VRS评分),是否有咽喉疼痛及患者麻醉满意度。结果GH组共纳入51例,ACTH组44例,control组68例。苏醒期及术后24 h各组患者躁动无显著差异。术后24 h VRS评分提示CT组高于control组(P<0.01),VAS评分提示ACTH组高于control组(P<0.001)。术后咽喉疼痛中ACTH组发生率高于control组(P<0.05)。术后24 h QoR-40评分,ACTH组显著低于control组(P<0.01)。结论分泌促肾上腺皮质激素的患者术后恶心、头痛、咽喉痛的发生率显著升高、QoR-40的评分显著减低。
暂无评论