检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of AI-Assisted Heart Contouring

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics 2024年第2期120卷 S41-S41页

作者： Bitterman, D.S. Guthier, C.V. Shin, K.Y. Zeleznik, R. Doyle, P. Guevara, M. Kang, H. Dillon-Martin, M. Perkins, T. Orlina, L.T. Pei, Y. Bredfeldt, J.S. Catalano, P.J. Bellon, J.R. Punglia, R.S. Warren, L. Wong, J.S. Kozono, D.E. Mak, R.H. Department of Radiation Oncology Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women’s Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA Department of Data Science Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIM) Program at Harvard Boston MA Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Dana-Farber Boston MA United States Department of Radiation Oncology Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine Boston MA Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Dana-Farber Boston MA Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston MA Department of Radiation Oncology Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston MA Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Harvard Medical School Boston MA Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center Boston MA Department of Radiation Oncology Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA

Purpose/Objective(s)artificial intelligence (AI) normal tissue contouring tools are now widely available and used in many treatment planning systems. However, few studies have prospectively demonstrated the value of such tools when employed in clinical workflows. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the benefit of using an AI heart contouring algorithm to assist breast radiotherapy (RT) planning. Materials/MethodsA single institution, 2-arm randomized controlled crossover trial was undertaken between December 2021 and October 2023. A convolutional neural network for heart auto-contouring, which had median Dice 0.95 compared to gold standard contours and reduced contouring time by 50% in pre-clinical studies, was implemented as a scripted tool within a treatment planning system. Eligible patients had breast cancer planned for RT, with hearts contoured according to the randomization of the dosimetrist assigned to their plan. Dosimetrists were stratified by experience and randomized to (1) manual heart contouring first or (2) AI-assisted heart contouring first. AI-assisted contouring consisted of running the model within the treatment planning system and editing the contour as needed. After completing 5 cases on the initial contour strategy, dosimetrists crossed to the other strategy. Co-primary outcomes were feasibility and efficacy, defined as heart contouring time (measured by recording screen during contouring). Secondary endpoints included dosimetrist and treating physician contour assessments. The trial had 90% power to detect a 30% reduction in contour time with 2-sided type I error of 5%. ResultsOne hundred eighteen patients enrolled; 60 patients’ hearts were contoured manually and 58 with AI assistance. Eleven dosimetrists enrolled; 5 were randomized to manual first arm and 6 to AI-assisted first arm. There was no difference in manual vs. AI-assisted contour time overall (mean 277.3 ± 151.2 vs. 267.2 ± 199.0 seconds, P = 0.76), on the manual fi

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Maintaining the Quality and Aroma of Coffee with Fuzzy Logic Coffee Roasting Machine

引用

IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental science 2020年第1期426卷

作者： Harsawardana Bayu Samodro Bharuno Mahesworo Teddy Suparyanto Don Bosco Surya Atmaja Bens Pardamean Artificial Intelligence Research and Innovation Center for Agroindustry (AIRICA) Institut Pertanian STIPER Yogyakarta Indonesia 55281 Mechatronics and AI Research & Development Center Biotechnic Innovation Yogyakarta Indonesia 55281 Bioinformatics and Data Science Research Center Bina Nusantara University Jakarta Indonesia 11480 Computer Science Department BINUS Graduate Program - Master of Computer Science Bina Nusantara University Jakarta Indonesia 11480

With the increasing global demands of coffee, Indonesia need to increase their coffee beans supply and improve the quality to maintain its position in the international coffee industry. One of the most important coffeepre-processing, coffee bean roasting, is under developed in Indonesia. Indonesia coffee farmers prefer to use the traditional cauldron to roast their coffee beans. Roasting coffee beans using traditional cauldron is inefficient and resulting unequal roasted level for the coffee beans. In this study, we proposed atemperature control system based on fuzzy logic for coffee roaster machine. The system controls the temperature in accordance with the demanded roasting level. A thermal camera is attached inside the roasting chamber to monitor the heaton the roasted coffee beans. The thermal camera is integrated with a stirring mechanism to equalise the heat among the beans.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

AI-Based Ripeness Grading for Oil Palm Fresh Fruit Bunch in Smart Crane Grabber

引用

IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental science 2020年第1期426卷

作者： Harsawardana Reza Rahutomo Bharuno Mahesworo Tjeng Wawan Cenggoro Arif Budiarto Teddy Suparyanto Don Bosco Surya Atmaja Bayu Samoedro Bens Pardamean Artificial Intelligence Research and Innovation Center for Agroindustry (AIRICA) Institut Pertanian STIPER Yogyakarta Indonesia 55281 Bioinformatics and Data Science Research Center Bina Nusantara University Jakarta Indonesia 11480 Computer Science Department School of Computer Science Bina Nusantara University Jakarta Indonesia 11480 Mechatronics and AI Research & Development Center Biotechnic Innovation Yogyakarta Indonesia 55281 Computer Science Department BINUS Graduate Program - Master of Computer Science Bina Nusantara University Jakarta Indonesia 11480

Indonesia is one of the biggest palm oil exporters in the world. For Indonesia to stay competitive in thepalm oil industry, the harvesting and evacuating process in its oil palm plantation need to be optimized. This research introduces machinerycalled as Smart Crane Grabber. This machinery can be used for automatic harvesting and evacuation process of oil palm fresh fruit bunch. To enable automation, Smart Crane Grabber is equipped with an artificial intelligencesystem for automatic ripeness sorting. Theartificial intelligence system developed for Smart Crane Grabber achieves 71.34% accuracy by using only 400 images as preliminary training data.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Author Correction: A systematic genome-wide mapping of oncogenic mutation selection during CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing

引用

Nature communications 2022年第1期13卷 2828页

作者： Sanju Sinha Karina Barbosa Kuoyuan Cheng Mark D M Leiserson Prashant Jain Anagha Deshpande David M Wilson Bríd M Ryan Ji Luo Ze'ev A Ronai Joo Sang Lee Aniruddha J Deshpande Eytan Ruppin Cancer Data Science Laboratory Center for Cancer Research National Cancer Institute National Institutes of Health Bethesda MD 20892 USA. Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis Center for Cancer Research National Cancer Institute National Institutes of Health Bethesda MD 20850 USA. Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology University of Maryland College Park MD 20742 USA. Tumor Initiation Program Cancer Center Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute La Jolla CA 92037 USA. Laboratory of Molecular Gerontology National Institute on Aging Intramural Research Program National Institutes of Health Baltimore MD 21224 USA. Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics Center for Cancer Research National Cancer Institute National Institute of Health Bethesda MD 20850 USA. Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Suwon 16419 Republic of Korea. Department of Precision Medicine School of Medicine and Department of Artificial Intelligence Sungkyunkwan University Suwon 16419 Republic of Korea. Tumor Initiation Program Cancer Center Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute La Jolla CA 92037 USA. adeshpande@***. Cancer Data Science Laboratory Center for Cancer Research National Cancer Institute National Institutes of Health Bethesda MD 20892 USA. eytan.ruppin@nih.gov.

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Solving Diagnosability of Hybrid Systems via Abstraction and Discrete Event Techniques

引用

IFAC-PapersOnLine 2017年第1期50卷 5023-5028页

作者： Grastien A. Travé-Massuyès L. Puig V. Data61 Decision Science Program the ANU Artificial Intelligence Group France LAAS-CNRS Université de Toulouse France SAC Group Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Barcelona Spain

This paper addresses the problem of determining the diagnosability of hybrid systems by abstracting hybrid models to a discrete event setting. From the continuous model the abstraction only remembers two pieces of information: indiscernability between modes (when they are guaranteed to generate different observations) and ephemerality (when the system cannot stay forever in a given set of modes). Then, we use standard discrete event system diagnosability algorithms. The second contribution is an iterative approach to diagnosability that starts from the most abstract discrete event model of the hybrid system. If it is diagnosable, that means that the hybrid system is diagnosable. If it is not, the counterexample generated by the diagnosability procedure is analysed to refine the DES. If no refinement is found, then it can not be proved that the hybrid system is diagnosable. Otherwise, the refinement is included in the abstract DES model and the diagnosability procedure continues. © 2017

关键词： Diagnosability discrete event systems Hybrid systems Invariant sets

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

The importance of transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence research

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2020年

作者： Haibe-Kains, Benjamin Adam, George Alexandru Hosny, Ahmed Khodakarami, Farnoosh Waldron, Levi Wang, Bo McIntosh, Chris Kundaje, Anshul Greene, Casey S. Hoffman, Michael M. Leek, Jeffrey T. Huber, Wolfgang Brazma, Alvis Pineau, Joelle Tibshirani, Robert Hastie, Trevor Ioannidis, John P.A. Quackenbush, John Aerts, Hugo J.W.L. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network TorontoON Canada Department of Medical Biophysics University of Toronto TorontoON Canada Department of Computer Science University of Toronto TorontoON Canada Ontario Institute for Cancer Research TorontoON Canada Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence TorontoON Canada Program Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School BostonMA United States Radiation Oncology and Radiology Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Brigham and Women's Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy New YorkNY United States Peter Munk Cardiac Centre University Health Network TorontoON Canada Hospital Harvard Medical School BostonMA United States Department of Genetics Stanford University School of Medicine StanfordCA United States Dept. of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Childhood Cancer Data Lab Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Biostatistics Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health BaltimoreMD United States European Molecular Biology Laboratory Genome Biology Unit Heidelberg Germany European Molecular Biology Laboratory European Bioinformatics Institute EMBL-EBI Hinxton United Kingdom McGill University MontrealQC Canada Montreal Institute for Learning Algorithms QC Canada StanfordCA United States Department of Biomedical Data Science Stanford University School of Medicine StanfordCA United States Departments of Medicine of Health Research and Policy and of Biomedical Data Science Stanford University School of Medicine StanfordCA United States Department of Statistics Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences StanfordCA United States Department of Biostatistics Harvard T.H Chan School of Public Health BostonMA Un

In their study, McKinney et al. showed the high potential of artificial intelligence for breast cancer screening. However, the lack of detailed methods and computer code undermines its scientific value. We identify obstacles hindering transparent and reproducible AI research as faced by McKinney et al and provide solutions with implications for the broader field. Copyright © 2020, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： artificial intelligence

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Analysis of the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2024年

作者： LaBella, Dominic Baid, Ujjwal Khanna, Omaditya McBurney-Lin, Shan McLean, Ryan Nedelec, Pierre Rashid, Arif Tahon, Nourel Hoda Altes, Talissa Bhalerao, Radhika Dhemesh, Yaseen Godfrey, Devon Hilal, Fathi Floyd, Scott Janas, Anastasia Kazerooni, Anahita Fathi Kirkpatrick, John Kent, Collin Kofler, Florian Leu, Kevin Maleki, Nazanin Menze, Bjoern Pajot, Maxence Reitman, Zachary J. Rudie, Jeffrey D. Saluja, Rachit Velichko, Yury Wang, Chunhao Warman, Pranav Adewole, Maruf Albrecht, Jake Anazodo, Udunna Anwar, Syed Muhammad Bergquist, Timothy Chen, Sully Francis Chung, Verena Conte, Gian-Marco Dako, Farouk Eddy, James Ezhov, Ivan Khalili, Nastaran Iglesias, Juan Eugenio Jiang, Zhifan Johanson, Elaine Van Leemput, Koen Li, Hongwei Bran Linguraru, Marius George Liu, Xinyang Mahtabfar, Aria Meier, Zeke Moawad, Ahmed W. Mongan, John Piraud, Marie Shinohara, Russell Takeshi Wiggins, Walter F. Abayazeed, Aly H. Akinola, Rachel Jakab, András Bilello, Michel de Verdier, Maria Correia Crivellaro, Priscila Davatzikos, Christos Farahani, Keyvan Freymann, John Hess, Christopher Huang, Raymond Lohmann, Philipp Moassefi, Mana Pease, Matthew W. Vollmuth, Phillipp Sollmann, Nico Diffley, David Nandolia, Khanak K. Warren, Daniel I. Hussain, Ali Fehringer, Pascal Bronstein, Yulia Deptula, Lisa Stein, Evan G. Taherzadeh, Mahsa de Oliveira, Eduardo Portela Haughey, Aoife Kontzialis, Marinos Saba, Luca Turner, Benjamin Brüßeler, Melanie M.T. Ansari, Shehbaz Gkampenis, Athanasios Weiss, David Maximilian Mansour, Aya Shawali, Islam H. Yordanov, Nikolay Stein, Joel M. Hourani, Roula Moshebah, Mohammed Yahya Abouelatta, Ahmed Magdy Rizvi, Tanvir Willms, Klara Martin, Dann C. Okar, Abdullah D'Anna, Gennaro Taha, Ahmed Sharifi, Yasaman Faghani, Shahriar Kite, Dominic Pinho, Marco Haider, Muhammad Ammar Aristizabal, Alejandro Karargyris, Alexandros Kassem, Hasan Pati, Sarthak Sheller, Micah Alonso-Basanta, Michelle Villanueva-Meyer, Javier Rauschecker, Andreas M. Nada, Ayman Aboian, Mariam Flanders, Adam E. Wiestler, Benedikt Bakas, Spyridon Ca Duke University Medical Center Department of Radiation Oncology DurhamNC United States Division of Computational Pathology Department of Pathology Laboratory Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine IndianapolisIN United States Center for Federated Learning in Medicine Indiana University IndianapolisIN United States Department of Neurosurgery Thomas Jefferson University PhiladelphiaPA United States University of California San FranciscoCA United States Yale University New HavenCT United States Department of Radiation Oncology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States University of Missouri ColumbiaMO United States Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science Indiana University School of Medicine IndianapolisIN United States Children's Hospital of Philadelphia University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Helmholtz AI Helmholtz Munich Germany Department of Informatics Technical University Munich Germany TranslaTUM - Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research Technical University of Munich Germany Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology School of Medicine Klinikum rechts der Isar Technical University of Munich Germany San FranciscoCA United States Biomedical Image Analysis and Machine Learning Department of Quantitative Biomedicine University of Zurich Switzerland Department of Neuroradiology Technical University of Munich Munich Germany University of San Diego CA United States Cornell University IthacaNY United States Department of Radiology Northwestern University EvanstonIL United States Duke University Medical Center School of Medicine DurhamNC United States Lab Crestview Radiology Lagos Nigeria Sage Bionetworks United States McGill University MontrealQC Canada Children's National Hospital WashingtonDC United States George Washington University WashingtonDC United State

We describe the design and results from the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge. The BraTS Meningioma Challenge differed from prior BraTS Glioma challenges in that it focused on meningiomas, which are typically benign extra-axial tumors with diverse radiologic and anatomical presentation and a propensity for multiplicity. Nine participating teams each developed deep-learning automated segmentation models using image data from the largest multi-institutional systematically expert annotated multilabel multi-sequence meningioma MRI dataset to date, which included 1000 training set cases, 141 validation set cases, and 283 hidden test set cases. Each case included T2, T2/FLAIR, T1, and T1Gd brain MRI sequences with associated tumor compartment labels delineating enhancing tumor, non-enhancing tumor, and surrounding non-enhancing T2/FLAIR hyperintensity. Participant automated segmentation models were evaluated and ranked based on a scoring system evaluating lesion-wise metrics including dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff Distance. The top ranked team had a lesion-wise median dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.976, 0.976, and 0.964 for enhancing tumor, tumor core, and whole tumor, respectively and a corresponding average DSC of 0.899, 0.904, and 0.871, respectively. These results serve as state-of-the-art benchmarks for future pre-operative meningioma automated segmentation algorithms. Additionally, we found that 1286 of 1424 cases (90.3%) had at least 1 compartment voxel abutting the edge of the skull-stripped image edge, which requires further investigation into optimal pre-processing face anonymization steps. © 2024, CC BY.

关键词： Tumors

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Correction: A COVID-19 Pandemic artificial intelligence-Based System With Deep Learning Forecasting and Automatic Statistical data Acquisition: Development and Implementation Study

引用

Journal of medical Internet research 2021年第7期23卷 e31085页

作者： Cheng-Sheng Yu Shy-Shin Chang Tzu-Hao Chang Jenny L Wu Yu-Jiun Lin Hsiung-Fei Chien Ray-Jade Chen Department of Family Medicine School of Medicine College of Medicine Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan. Department of Family Medicine Taipei Medical University Hospital Taipei Taiwan. Graduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics College of Medical Science and Technology Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan. Professional Master Program in Artificial Intelligence in Medicine College of Medicine Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan. Clinical Big Data Research Center Taipei Medical University Hospital Taipei Taiwan. Division of Plastic Surgery Department of Surgery Taipei Medical University Hospital and School of Medicine College of Medicine Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan. Department of Surgery School of Medicine College of Medicine Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan. Division of General Surgery Department of Surgery Taipei Medical University Hospital Taipei Taiwan.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.2196/27806.].

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

QU-BraTS: MICCAI BraTS 2020 Challenge on Quantifying Uncertainty in Brain Tumor Segmentation - Analysis of Ranking Scores and Benchmarking Results

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2021年

作者： Mehta, Raghav Filos, Angelos Baid, Ujjwal Sako, Chiharu McKinley, Richard Rebsamen, Michael Dätwyler, Katrin Meier, Raphael Radojewski, Piotr Murugesan, Gowtham Krishnan Nalawade, Sahil Ganesh, Chandan Wagner, Ben Yu, Fang F. Fei, Baowei Madhuranthakam, Ananth J. Maldjian, Joseph A. Daza, Laura Gómez, Catalina Arbeláez, Pablo Dai, Chengliang Wang, Shuo Reynaud, Hadrien Mo, Yuanhan Angelini, Elsa Guo, Yike Bai, Wenjia Banerjee, Subhashis Pei, Linmin Murat, A.K. Rosas-González, Sarahi Zemmoura, Ilyess Tauber, Clovis Vu, Minh H. Nyholm, Tufve Löfstedt, Tommy Ballestar, Laura Mora Vilaplana, Veronica McHugh, Hugh Talou, Gonzalo Maso Wang, Alan Patel, Jay Chang, Ken Hoebel, Katharina Gidwani, Mishka Arun, Nishanth Gupta, Sharut Aggarwal, Mehak Singh, Praveer Gerstner, Elizabeth R. Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree Boutry, Nicolas Huard, Alexis Vidyaratne, Lasitha Rahman, Md Monibor Iftekharuddin, Khan M. Chazalon, Joseph Puybareau, Elodie Tochon, Guillaume Ma, Jun Cabezas, Mariano Llado, Xavier Oliver, Arnau Valencia, Liliana Valverde, Sergi Amian, Mehdi Soltaninejad, Mohammadreza Myronenko, Andriy Hatamizadeh, Ali Feng, Xue Dou, Quan Tustison, Nicholas Meyer, Craig Shah, Nisarg A. Talbar, Sanjay Weber, Marc-André Mahajan, Abhishek Jakab, Andras Wiest, Roland Fathallah-Shaykh, Hassan M. Nazeri, Arash Milchenko, Mikhail Marcus, Daniel Kotrotsou, Aikaterini Colen, Rivka Freymann, John Kirby, Justin Davatzikos, Christos Menze, Bjoern Bakas, Spyridon Gal, Yarin Arbel, Tal McGill University MontrealQC Canada Group University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine The University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology University of Bern Inselspital Bern University Hospital Bern Switzerland Department of Radiology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center DallasTX United States Department of Bioengineering University of Texas DallasTX United States Advanced Imaging Research Center University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center DallasTX United States Universidad de los Andes Bogotá Colombia Data Science Institute Imperial College London London United Kingdom NIHR Imperial BRC ITMAT Data Science Group Imperial College London London United Kingdom Department of Brain Sciences Imperial College London London United Kingdom Machine Intelligence Unit Indian Statistical Institute Kolkata India Department of CSE University of Calcutta Kolkata India Department of Information Technology Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden Department of Diagnostic Radiology The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center PittsburghPA United States UMR U1253 iBrain Université de Tours Inserm Tours France Department of Radiation Sciences Umeå University Umeå Sweden Department of Computing Science Umeå University Umeå Sweden Signal Theory and Communications Department Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Barcelona Tech Barcelona Spain Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand Radiology Department Auckland City Hospital Auckland New Zealand Auckland Bioengineering Institute University of Auckland New Zealand Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging Department of Radiology

Deep learning (DL) models have provided state-of-the-art performance in various medical imaging benchmarking challenges, including the Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenges. However, the task of focal pathology multi-compartment segmentation (e.g., tumor and lesion sub-regions) is particularly challenging, and potential errors hinder translating DL models into clinical workflows. Quantifying the reliability of DL model predictions in the form of uncertainties could enable clinical review of the most uncertain regions, thereby building trust and paving the way toward clinical translation. Several uncertainty estimation methods have recently been introduced for DL medical image segmentation tasks. Developing scores to evaluate and compare the performance of uncertainty measures will assist the end-user in making more informed decisions. In this study, we explore and evaluate a score developed during the BraTS 2019 and BraTS 2020 task on uncertainty quantification (QU-BraTS) and designed to assess and rank uncertainty estimates for brain tumor multi-compartment segmentation. This score (1) rewards uncertainty estimates that produce high confidence in correct assertions and those that assign low confidence levels at incorrect assertions, and (2) penalizes uncertainty measures that lead to a higher percentage of under-confident correct assertions. We further benchmark the segmentation uncertainties generated by 14 independent participating teams of QU-BraTS 2020, all of which also participated in the main BraTS segmentation task. Overall, our findings confirm the importance and complementary value that uncertainty estimates provide to segmentation algorithms, highlighting the need for uncertainty quantification in medical image analyses. Finally, in favor of transparency and reproducibility, our evaluation code is made publicly available at https://***/RagMeh11/QU-BraTS. © 2021, CC BY.

关键词： Benchmarking

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

The repertoire of mutational signatures in human cancer (vol 578, pg 94, 2020)

引用

NATURE 2023年第7948期614卷 E41-E41页

作者： Alexandrov, Ludmil B. Kim, Jaegil Haradhvala, Nicholas J. Huang, Mi Ni Ng, Alvin Wei Tian Wu, Yang Boot, Arnoud Covington, Kyle R. Gordenin, Dmitry A. Bergstrom, Erik N. Islam, S. M. Ashiqul Lopez-Bigas, Nuria Klimczak, Leszek J. McPherson, John R. Morganella, Sandro Sabarinathan, Radhakrishnan Wheeler, David A. Mustonen, Ville Getz, Gad Rozen, Steven G. Stratton, Michael R. Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine Department of Bioengineering Moores Cancer Center University of California San Diego CA USA Wellcome Sanger Institute Wellcome Genome Campus Hinxton UK Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and Department of Bioengineering University of California San Diego La Jolla CA USA UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center San Diego CA USA University of California San Diego San Diego CA USA Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard Cambridge MA USA Center for Cancer Research Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA Department of Pathology Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA Laboratory for Medical Science Mathematics RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences Yokohama Japan Computational Biology Program Ontario Institute for Cancer Research Toronto ON Canada Programme in Cancer & Stem Cell Biology Duke-NUS Medical School Singapore Singapore Centre for Computational Biology Duke-NUS Medical School Singapore Singapore Programme in Cancer and Stem Cell Biology Duke-NUS Medical School Singapore Singapore Programme in Cancer and Stem Cell Biology Centre for Computational Biology Duke-NUS Medical School Singapore Singapore SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute of Precision Medicine National Heart Centre Singapore Singapore Singapore Cancer Science Institute of Singapore National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology Singapore Singapore Laboratory of Cancer Epigenome Division of Medical Science National Cancer Centre Singapore Singapore Singapore Duke-NUS Medical School Singapore Singapore Human Genome Sequencing Center Baylor College of Medicine Houston TX USA Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center Baylor College of Medicine Houston TX USA Department of Molecular and Human Genetics Baylor College of Medicine Houston TX USA Genome Integrity and Structural Biology Laboratory National Ins

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：