检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

NAVAL ENGINEERs JOURNAL 1991年第2期103卷 29-49页

作者： sCHAFFER, RL KLOEHN, HG Roger L. Schaffer is currently the manager of preliminary design for Advanced Marine Enterprises in Arlington Virginia. Mr. Schaffer received bachelor degrees in naval architecture and marine engineering and aerospace engineering from the University of Michigan in 1971. In 1974 he received his master's degree in naval architecture from MIT. Mr. Schaffer started his career with the Naval Ship Engineering Center and has worked for Boeing Marine Systems Hydronautics and Designers & Planners. He was associated with various phases of the NFR-90 program from 1982 until. 1990. His last NFR-90 assignment was design integration manager for the International Ship Studies Company (ISS) in Hamburg West Germany where he was responsible for all naval architectural work as well as combat system installation and marine engineering integration with the platform. He is a registered professional engineer. Harvey G. Kloehn received his B.S. degree in electrical engineering from Marquette University in 1951. He went to work in the Bureau of Ships and spent 32 years in naval combat systems engineering. Mr. Kloehn also served on active duty in the U.S. Navy from 1955 to 1958. Mr. Kloehn retired from the Naval Sea Systems Command in 1985 as technical director to the deputy commander for AAW/surface warfare. He is a charter member of the Senior Executive Service. After a brief retirement he went to work for NKF Engineering and then for Westinghouse as ship design manager and later chief engineer of the NA TO Frigate Program assigned to Hamburg West Germany. Mr. Kloehn received the ASNE Jimmie Hamilton award for the best paper published in the Journal in 1972. He is a registered professional engineer.

The NATO Frigate Replacement for the 1990s (NFR-90) Project was a unique approach to naval ship design and acquisition. It would have been the first U.s. Navy surface combatant primarily designed by an international organization. As a planning scenario, up to 60 ships, including 18 for the U.s. Navy, were to be acquired by the eight participating nations, making it potentially the largest NATO project ever attempted. Approximately 1,000 man years over a 10-year period were invested in the project. The project was prematurely terminated in January 1990. Nevertheless, a significant amount of work had been completed;the basic design of the ship was firmly established by a preliminary design, the combat system was thoroughly studied, and the economics of the program were well established. This paper describes the project, the technical aspects of the ship and combat system design, its innovative features and significant economic advantages. The conclusions relative to Aegis vs. NFR-90 or NFR-90/ Aegis mix (Table 14) are the opinions of the authors and the estimates of associated costs have not been validated by the Naval sea systems Command.

关键词： Naval Vessels

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

THE NAVY DIsTILLATE FUEL CONVERsION program

引用

Naval Engineers Journal 1971年第6期83卷 51-58页

作者： sIGAL, EDWARD B. The authoris the Assistant for Special Projects in the Steam Generator Branch at the Philadelphia Division of the Naval Ship Engineering Center. He graduated from Penn State University in 1961 with a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering and attended the University of Pennsylvania. Upon graduation he was employed at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard's Design Division where he conducted Propulsion System Evaluation Trials on new construction ships. For the last seven years he has been a member of the Naval Ship Engineering Center's engineering staff during which time he has conducted and been responsible for research development testing and evaluation of Naval Steam Generators and their appurtenances and has been coordinating the Distillate Fuel Conversion Program since 1967. He is a member of Pi Tau Sigma and Tau Beta Pi.

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

sHIP sERVICE ELECTRICAL systems - designING FOR sURVIVABILITY

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERs JOURNAL 1990年第5期102卷 32-36页

作者： CERMINARA, J KOTACKA, RO John Cerminara:is a principal engineer with Westinghouse Machinery Technology Division Electrical Systems Department. He holds a B.S. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Pittsburgh. He is a registered professional engineer and a member of IEEE ASNE and the Ship Steering Group of the Combat Survivability Division of ADPA. Mr. Cerminara has had over 30 years of multidiscipline experience ranging from engineering and construction in heavy industry to standards and publications. Past assignments include DOE/ NASA wind turbine project manager for Westinghouse and task leader of MTD electrical systems. Most recent assignments have included hull mechanical and electrical (HM&E) distributive system survivability analyses of the LSD-41 mobility mission area and application and validation of NavSea computer-aided design of Survivable Distributive System (CADSDiS) Program. Rolf O. Kotacka:is presently a ship systems engineer in the Ship Systems Engineering Branch of the Naval Sea Systems Command Engineering Directorate where his primary responsibility is ship system survivability. He is a 1977 graduate of SUNY Maritime College where he received his bachelor of engineering degree in marine electrical engineering as well as a U.S. Coast Guard Third Assistant Engineer License and a commission in the U. S. Naval Reserve. Upon graduation Mr. Kotacka was employed by Charleston Naval Shipyard as a field engineer until 1981 where he gained his background in surface ship HM&E systems and equipment. He then transferred to the Supervisor of Shipbuilding Conversion and Repair Groton where he served as a senior electrical engineer monitoring the design and construction of Trident and 688 class submarines and received the Meritorious Unit Citation. Prior to his present position Mr. Kotacka was the life cycle manager for diesel generator sets in the Naval Sea Systems Command's Generators Branch. He has coauthored several papers dealing with power generation for ASE and SNAME. Mr. Kotacka is also a lieutena

This paper highlights the survivability concerns in the design of ship service power systems. The paper gives a brief description of what constitutes a typical ship service electric power system and concentrates on electric power generation and associated controls. Established survivability design principles and guidelines are highlighted and the application of those guidelines are discussed. General specifications (Gen specs) for ships of the U.s. Navy are cited as the cornerstone for design. specific design criteria are cited as well as the rationale associated with the survivability design guidelines pertaining to power generation and distribution. The application of these survivability design guidelines plus the use of the deactivation diagram/damage tolerance analysis cited in the Gen spec section 072e will enhance overall design and help ensure survivable electric power systems for surface combatants.

关键词： Warships

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

A COMPUTER-MODEL FOR sHIPBOARD ENERGY ANALYsIs

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERs JOURNAL 1984年第5期96卷 33-45页

作者： DETOLLA, JP FLEMING, JR Joseph DeTolla:is a ship systems engineer in the Ship Systems Engineering Division SEA 56D5 at the Naval Sea Systems Command. His career with the Navy started in 1965 at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard Design Division. In 1971 he transferred to the Naval Ship Engineering Center. He has held positions as a fluid systems design engineer and auxiliary systems design integration engineer. Mr. DeTolla has worked extensively in the synthesis and analysis of total energy systems notably the design development of the FFG-7 class waste heat recovery system. He is NA VSEA's machinery group computer supported design project coordinator and is managing the development of a machinery systems data base load forecasting algorithms and design analysis computer programs. Mr. DeTolla has a bachelor of science degree in mechanical engineering from Drexel University and a master of engineering administration degree from George Washington University. He is a registered professional engineer in the District of Columbia and has written several technical papers on waste heat recovery and energy conservation. Jeffrey Fleming:is a senior project engineer in the Energy R&D Office at the David Taylor Naval Ship R&D Center. In his current position as group leader for the future fleet energy conservation portion of the Navy's energy R&D program he is responsible for the identification and development of advanced components and subsystems which will lead to reductions in the fossil fuel consumption of future ships. Over the past several years he has also directed the development and application of total energy computer analysis techniques for the assessment of conventional and advanced shipboard machinery concepts. Mr. Fleming is a 1971 graduate electrical engineer of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and received his MS in electrical engineering from Johns Hopkins University in 1975. Mr. Fleming has authored various technical publications and was the recipient of the Severn Technical Society's “Best Technical Paper of the Year” award in 1

In support of the Navy's efforts to improve the energy usage of future ships and thereby to reduce fleet operating costs, a large scale computer model has been developed by the David Taylor Naval ship Research and Development Center (DTNsRDC) to analyze the performance of shipboard energy systems for applications other than nuclear or oil-fired steam propulsion plants. This paper discusses the applications and utility of this computer program as a performance analysis tool for design of ship machinery systems. The program is a simulation model that performs a complete thermodynamic analysis of a user-specified energy system. It offers considerable flexibility in analyzing a variety of propulsion, electrical, and auxiliary plant configurations through a component building block structure. Component subroutines that model the performance of shipboard equipment such as engines, boilers, generators, and compressors are available from the program library. Component subroutines are selected and linked in the program to model the desired machinery plant functional configurations. The operation of the defined shipboard energy system may then be simulated over a user-specified scenario of temperature, time, and load profiles. The program output furnishes information on component operating characteristics and fuel demands, which allows evaluation of the total system performance.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

design Joins the Battle Against sickle-cell Disease

引用

design management review 2013年第2期24卷 48-53页

作者： Lori E Crosby Naomi E Joffe Linda A Dunseath Rachel Lee Pediatric psychologist at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. She is also co‐director of Innovations in Community Research and Program Evaluation and the director of training for the Community Engagement Core of the Cincinnati Center for Clinical and Translational Science and Training. As a director and collaborator on more than 15 federal grants Crosby has emerged as a leader in conducting research to transform the healthcare system for adolescents and young adults with sickle cell disease. In 2012 she was elected as Fellow of the American Psychological Association Division 54 for her work with individuals affected by sickle cell disease. She holds a doctorate from Wright State University School of Professional Psychology (Dayton Ohio). Doctorate in clinical psychology and completed her residency and fellowship in pediatric psychology at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC). Joffe stayed on at CCHMC and is now clinical faculty within the Division of Behavioral Medicine serving hematology patients within the Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute. Her research focuses on diverse pediatric populations within the context of chronic illness and she has examined factors related to adherence self‐management pain and coping. She earned her bachelor's degree from Indiana University and her doctorate from Georgia State University. Executive director of the Live Well Collaborative (LWC) an innovation incubator that partners with the University of Cincinnati (UC) and member organizations to develop products and services to meet the growing needs of the 50+ population. Since joining LWC in 2007 she has worked with industry partners and UC to plan 37 projects that have exposed more than 500 students and 30 faculty to multidisciplinary teamwork using design‐thinking tools. She holds a BS in business (marketing) from Miami University. Graphic communication design student at the College of Design Architecture Art and Planning at the University of Cincinnati. She has participated in two cooper

A design‐thinking approach at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center helps kids with sickle‐cell disease transition into managing their disease as adults.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

MK-92 FIRE-CONTROL system

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERs JOURNAL 1979年第4期91卷 69-76页

作者： RYAN, FN BERLIN, J Mr. Floyd N. Ryan graduated from Frostburg State College and has performed graduate studies in Technology of Management at American University and University of Southern California. He is presently Executive Director of the Surface Missile Systems Sub-Group in the Naval Sea Systems Command. He was previously Deputy Project Manager of the MK-92 FCS/MK-75 Gun Project Deputy Systems Engineering Manager in the AEGIS Project and Surface Missile Systems Branch Head in the Naval Ordnance Systems Command. His earlier experience with the Department of the Navy included the Engineering Interface Management Office in the Bureau of Ships the Foreign Ship Systems Engineering Office and Switching Systems Design Office at RCA Service Company and he served for four years in the U.S. Navy as an Electronic Technician Petty Officer. In addition to ASNE he is a member of the Association of Scientists and Engineers and is the Executive Director (NAVSEA) for the 1978-79 term. In addition to several outstanding performance awards and citations for achievement Mr. Ryan received the Navy Meritorious Civilian Service Award for exceptional contribution to the development of the AEGIS Weapon System. Mr. Jack Berlin received his Bachelor's degree in Electrical Engineering from the City College of New York and his M.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Columbia University. He spent eight years in the Radar and Microwave Electronics Section of the Naval Material Laboratory. Subsequently. he has had extensive experience in Radar and Fire Control Systems. This has included responsibility for the design and field evaluation of the GFCS MK 87 Radar. From 1972 to 1973 he was the Sperry Program Manager for the Fire Control System (FCS) MK 92. His current assignment is Assistant Manager for New Developments of Missile and Gun Fire Control Systems for the U.S. Navy. He is a member of the Tau Beta Pi and Eta Kappa Nu Honorary Societies.

The MK 92 Fire Control system (FCs) & a new, integrated, highly reliable and light-weight U.s. Navy Fire Control system for missile and gun control. This system, which is in production for the FFG, PCG, PGG and PHM ship Classes, provides the detection and automation required for modern naval warfare. search radar data & presented at a very high rate at the operator's console, a highly integrated man-machine interface. Utilization of monopulse and “track-while-scan” techniques result in multiple target tracking capability. The system console(s) offer a self-contained command and control capability and, in addition, standard digital computer channels provide the versatile interface with the ship's command and control, integrating the complete engagement process. Error cancellation techniques are employed to obtain high performance accuracy even under severe environmental conditions. The low manning requirement for both operation and maintenance is a key system attribute for all applications. Comprehensive “at-sea” evaluations, performed by the U.s. Navy, demonstrated successful system operation in all modes of surveillance, multi-target tracking and simultaneous missile and gun engagements. The “at-sea” performance record of the FCs MK 92 was cited by the Chief of Naval Operations to have established new standards for Naval surface Weapons systems.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Challenge - Naval force development

引用

Naval Engineers Journal 2004年第3期116卷 57-62页

作者： Hamilton, Charles s. Program Executive Officer for Ships REAR ADMIRAL HAMILTON is a native of Amityville New York. He attended Duke University graduating in May 1974 with a bachelor of science in zoology. He was commissioned in the Navy in May 1974 through the NROTC Program at Duke. Rear Adm. Hamilton's sea tours include electronics material officer and combat information center officer in USS Hawkins (DD 873) (1974 to 1976) fire control officer and missile officer in USS Coontz (DDG 40) (1976 to1978) operations officer in USS Callaghan (DDG 994) (1981 to 1984) executive officer USS Fox (CG 33) (1986 to 1988) and commanding officer USS O'Brien (DD 975) (1991 to 1993). Rear Adm. Hamilton's shore tours include anti-submarine warfare program analyst and administrative assistant to director Program Resource Appraisal Division (OP-91) Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (1984 to 1986) head Aegis Destroyer Section (OP-355F) and financial coordinator Aegis Cruiser Destroyer Branch Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (1988 to 1990) and military staff specialist for naval war-fare in the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Technology) (1994 to 1996). In May 1996 Rear Adm. Hamilton became program manager for the arsenal ship which was designed to provide massed precision fires in support of Fleet commander's warfighting requirements. After completing the first two design phases and passing significant acquisition reform lessons learned to the DD 21 Program Office Rear Adm. Hamilton closed down the Arsenal Ship Program in March 1998. From April 1998 to February 2000 Rear Adm. Hamilton served as deputy for Fleet in the Program Executive Office Theater Surface Combatants (PEO TSC-F). In this position he was responsible for Fleet Introduction and Lifetime Support of 120 surface combatants (DDG 51 CG 47 DDG 993 DD 963 FFG 7). Rear Adm. Hamilton served as program executive officer for Surface Strike (PEO (S)) from February 2000 until November 2002. As PEO (S) he managed the Zumwalt-class DD 21/DD (X) N

The challenges which stood as an obstacle to the naval force development are discussed. The main challenge in the national security environment is to be virtually available anywhere in the world at the behest of the national command. It is observed that in surface warefare coast guard has the most applicability and expansion of their surveillance area will help in engaging other vessels away from the manned platform. It is also observed that the relationship with mission modularity and the growth between the coast guard and the navy has attracted interest among the international community.

关键词： Marine engineering

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

sHIP ENERGY-CONsERVATION AssIsT TEAM (sECAT)

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERs JOURNAL 1984年第2期96卷 47-58页

作者： DANGEL, R BRICE, AE The Authors A. Edward Brice was born and educated in Scotland where he graduated from the James Watt Memorial College and Paisley Technical College. His earliest marine engineering experience was obtained at Scotts's Shipbuilding and Engineering Company Limited from 1952 to 1959 where he was involved in the production and design of steam and diesel machinery plants for both Naval and commercial ships. During a five year stay in Canada Mr. Brice gained diversified experience in industries other than marine such as petrochemical plants and steel mills. He moved to the U.S. in 1964 where he was the design supervisor in charge of marine engineering at NASSCO covering new construction for American President Lines AFS type ships for the U.S. Navy Project Mohole Car Ferries for the State of Washington and 17 LST's for the U.S. Navy. During the contract definition phase of the DD-963 Mr. Brice authored several portions of the technical proposal while employed by Litton industries. He was also responsible for the system and detail design including the technical management of sub-contracts for the steam propulsion plant for the LHA 1 Class ships. Mr. Brice has been active in the Washington area for the last ten years performing marine engineering projects for the U.S. Navy. His principal interest since 1974 has been in shipboard energy conservation. He assisted in the development of the NavySTMSYS program and later in the operational verification aboard FF-1074. Mr. Brice has conducted four SECA T visits aboard ships with 1200 PSI steam plants and has recently completed an at-sea visit aboard on AOR with a 600 PSI steam plant. Richard Dangel was bom in New York City. He received his Bachelor's degree from the Sloan School of Industrial Management of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1955. He has also completed graduate work for a Masters in Engineering Administration at George Washington University. Since graduation he has spent 11 years in private industry with companies in the DOD engineering research

The ship Energy Conservation Assist Team (sECAT) program was initiated in Fiscal Year (FY) 82 by the Naval sea systems Command (NAVsEA) to demonstrate and introduce individual ship Commands to known energy conserving techniques without adding equipment complexity or additional maintenance burden. The principal objective is to provide each ship with an energy consumption, coupled with recommended energy conservation strategies. The technique involves both in-port and underway monitoring and introduction of energy efficient machinery plant alignments, fuel consumption curve generation, and most efficient speed curves. The program has completed visits on six combatants and enjoys the support of both the Commander, Naval surface Forces, U.s. Atlantic Fleet (COMNAVsURFLANT) and the Commander-in-Chief, U.s. Atlantic Fleet (CINCLANT). Plans are to perform sECAT on additional DDG 2 and FF 1052/1078 Class ships and initiate sECAT on additional ship types in FY 83.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

HIsTORY OF COAsT-GUARD sURFACE EFFECT sHIP PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENTs

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERs JOURNAL 1988年第3期100卷 237-250页

作者： LARIMER, G MCCOLLUM, J sCHAUB, B VANLIEW, D WHIPPLE, C Gary Larimer:received his B.S. (1974) and M.S. (1975) degrees in naval architecture and marine engineering from the University of Michigan. He has worked with the Bechtel Professional Corporation the David Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center and the United States Coast Guard. He is a member of SNAME ASNE ABYC and IMTI. He is the author of “Reaction Fin Applications In Marine Propulsion” which documented the use of asymmetric pre-swirl vanes to increase propulsion efficiency aboard a 41-ft Coast Guard utility boat. It was presented on 5 March 1987 at the Hampton Roads section of SNAME and was nominated for the section paper of the year award. CWO3 Joe Bobby McCollum USCG: iscurrently engineering officer of the Surface Effect Ship Division Seventh Coast Guard District Key West Florida. Prior to this assignment he was assistant engineering officer on the USCGCUte.His other duty tours included engineering assignments on theCape Currenta 95-foot patrol boat on the USCGCUnimak a 311-foot cutter CG Loran Station Upolo Point Hawaii and CG Station Sabine Pass Texas. CWO McCollum was responsible for modifying and repairing the SESs and contributed many unique problem solving ideas which resulted in much improved operation of the Coast Guard Surface Effect Ship Division. Benton H. Schaub:is a senior engineer with Maritime Dynamics Inc. He has a bachelor of science degree in naval architecture and marine engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Mr. Schaub has fifteen years of experience working as a test engineer project engineer and design engineer on advanced marine vehicle projects and is a recognized authority in the areas of hull structure seal system and machinery design for surface effect ships. He has participated in virtually every USN SES design development and test evaluation program including: XR-5 XR-10 SES-100A SES-100A1 and the SES-200. He is currently responsible for performing detailed design and analysis in support of the seal system for the Germa

During the early 1980s the United states Coast Guard took delivery of three surface effect ships (sEs) from Bell Halter, Inc. These 136-ton, 30-knot plus, aluminum hulled cutters were to be used primarily for drug interdiction in the southeastern United states. By early 1985, however, the full load weight of these cutters had grown to 150 long tons, and their top speed had dropped to below 23 knots in calm water. By mid-1985, operation of all three sEss was suspended to prevent possible catastrophic failure of their main engines. At this point, the UsCG joined ranks with Textron Marine systems (then Bell Aerospace), and Detroit Diesel to analyze what had gone wrong, and to propose solutions to the problems encountered. From that beginning, the performance of the Coast Guard's sEss has steadily and dramatically improved until at present all three cutters are able to exceed their original performance specifications. This paper discusses the problems experienced with the sEss, including engine overloading, vibration, ride quality, seal wear, poor lift system performance, and metal cracking, along with the corrective actions taken to solve them. The cooperation between government and private industry, which made this dramatic turn-around in performance possible, is also explored. Lessons learned about sEs technology are viewed in relation to the general experience of the Coast Guard with other types of high performance hull forms.

关键词： NAVAL VEssELs

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

CENTML CONTROL system TRAINING THROUGH sTA TIC AND DYNAMIC sIMULATION

引用

Naval Engineers Journal 1980年第2期92卷 196-206页

作者： HALL, EDWIN E. MOss, DONALD G. NORRIs, CLIFFORD s. PETERsON, HAROLD D. Mr. Edwin E. Hall received his Bachelor's degree in Electronics from Oklahoma City University. He also is a certified College-Level Instructor in the state of Florida and has done graduate work in Computer Science at the University of Florida. As the Technical Publications and Training Manager Simulation and Control Systems Department. General Electric Company Daytona Beach Fla. he currently is responsible for the costing. planning performance scheduling and timely completion of the Department's Technical Manuals and Technical Training Programs. These Training and Manual contracts cover Ship Systems Programs. Simulation Programs. and Communications Programs for the Armed Services and commercial customers. Mr. Hall has over twenty-years experience as a Technical Writer and Instructor and for the past seventeen years has been at the General Electric Company's Daytona Beach Facility. His experience ranges from teaching Basic Electronics and Radar Circuitry as a civilian instructor for the U.S. Army to writing Manuals Proposals Reports Specifications and Brochures for General Electric's product lines. Mr. Donald G. MOSS is a graduate of Kansas State University from which he received both his B.S. degree in Business Administration and his M.S. degree in Electrical Engineering. He is presently a Senior Systems Engineer for Control Systems in the Simulation and Control Systems Department at the General Electric Company's Daytona Beach Facility. He has been employed by General Electric for 23 years — the first seven as an Engineer and Program Manager on the Fire Control Systems for the Fleet Ballistics Missile Program the next six managing the design of control and checkout equipment on the APOLLO Program and the last ten years working on control equipment for the machinery plants of new Navy ships. Over the span of years at General Electric he has worked on propulsion control for the DD-963 propulsion electric plant and auxiliary control for the FFG-7: propulsion boiler burner electric auxiliary and car

Dynamic simulation is defined as the hardware and software required to present to the student operator visual and audible cues and responses that are the same as those encountered when operating the Control Consoles aborad ship. This type of simulation is considered essential to the development of operator skills for critical tasks. Less critical tasks can be practiced using static simulation devices. This paper discusses the utilization of these types of training devices to train Navy crews. An overview of the Machinery Control systems of the FFG 7 and AO 177 Class ships is discussed to provide an understanding of state‐of‐the‐art equipment development. The training programs for these two ship Classes are then reviewed to show how simulation devices are currently used by the Training Community, and this is followed by a brief discussion of the additional benefits that also are derived. © 1980 by the American society of Naval Engineers, Inc.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：