检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

arXiv 2025年

作者： Sun, Yingying Jun, A. Liu, Zhiwei Sun, Rui Qian, Liujia Payne, Samuel H. Bittremieux, Wout Ralser, Markus Li, Chen Chen, Yi Dong, Zhen Perez-Riverol, Yasset Khan, Asif Sander, Chris Aebersold, Ruedi Vizcaíno, Juan Antonio Krieger, Jonathan R. Yao, Jianhua Wen, Han Zhang, Linfeng Zhu, Yunping Xuan, Yue Sun, Benjamin Boyang Qiao, Liang Hermjakob, Henning Tang, Haixu Gao, Huanhuan Deng, Yamin Zhong, Qing Chang, Cheng Bandeira, Nuno Li, Ming Weinan, E. Sun, Siqi Yang, Yuedong Omenn, Gilbert S. Zhang, Yue Xu, Ping Fu, Yan Liu, Xiaowen Overall, Christopher M. Wang, Yu Deutsch, Eric W. Chen, Luonan Cox, Jürgen Demichev, Vadim He, Fuchu Huang, Jiaxing Jin, Huilin Liu, Chao Li, Nan Luan, Zhongzhi Song, Jiangning Yu, Kaicheng Wan, Wanggen Wang, Tai Zhang, Kang Zhang, Le Bell, Peter A. Mann, Matthias Zhang, Bing Guo, Tiannan Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital State Key Laboratory of Medical Proteomics School of Medicine Westlake University Zhejiang Province Hangzhou China Westlake Center for Intelligent Proteomics Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine Zhejiang Province Hangzhou China Biology Department Brigham Young University ProvoUT84602 United States Department of Computer Science University of Antwerp Antwerp2020 Belgium Department of Biochemistry CharitéUniversitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany Biomedicine Discovery Institute Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Monash University MelbourneVICVIC 3800 Australia Wellcome Genome Campus Hinxton CambridgeCB10 1SD United Kingdom Harvard Medical School Ludwig Center at Harvard United States Harvard Medical School Broad Institute Ludwig Center at Harvard Dana-Farber Cancer Institute United States Department of Biology Institute of Molecular Systems Biology ETH Zürich Zürich Switzerland Bruker Ltd. MiltonONL9T 6P4 Canada AI for Life Sciences Lab Tencent Shenzhen518057 China State Key Laboratory of Medical Proteomics AI for Science Institute Beijing100080 China Beijing Institute of Lifeomics Beijing102206 China Thermo Fisher Scientific GmbH Hanna-Kunath Str. 11 Bremen28199 Germany Informatics and Predictive Sciences Research Bristol Myers Squibb United States Department of Chemistry Fudan University Songhu Road 2005 Shanghai200438 China Department of Computer Science Luddy School of Informatics Computing and Engineering Indiana University IN47408 United States ProCan® Children’s Medical Research Institute Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney WestmeadNSW Australia La Jolla CA United States Central China Institute of Artificial Intelligence University of Waterloo Canada AI for Science Institute Center for Machine Learning Research School of Mathematical Sciences Peking University China Research Institute of Intelligent Complex Systems Fudan U

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming scientific research, including proteomics. Advances in mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics data quality, diversity, and scale, combined with groundbreaking AI techniques, are unlocking new challenges and opportunities in biological discovery. Here, we highlight key areas where AI is driving innovation, from data analysis to new biological insights. These include developing an AI-friendly ecosystem for proteomics data generation, sharing, and analysis;improving peptide and protein identification and quantification;characterizing protein-protein interactions and protein complexes;advancing spatial and perturbation proteomics;integrating multi-omics data;and ultimately enabling AI-empowered virtual cells. © 2025, CC BY.

关键词： Biotic

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Benchmarking the CoW with the TopCoW Challenge: Topology-Aware Anatomical Segmentation of the Circle of Willis for CTA and MRA

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2023年

作者： Yang, Kaiyuan Musio, Fabio Ma, Yihui Juchler, Norman Paetzold, Johannes C. Al-Maskari, Rami Höher, Luciano Li, Hongwei Bran Hamamci, Ibrahim Ethem Sekuboyina, Anjany Shit, Suprosanna Huang, Houjing Prabhakar, Chinmay de la Rosa, Ezequiel Waldmannstetter, Diana Kofler, Florian Navarro, Fernando Menten, Martin Ezhov, Ivan Rueckert, Daniel Vos, Iris Ruigrok, Ynte Velthuis, Birgitta Kuijf, Hugo Hämmerli, Julien Wurster, Catherine Bijlenga, Philippe Westphal, Laura Bisschop, Jeroen Colombo, Elisa Baazaoui, Hakim Makmur, Andrew Hallinan, James Wiestler, Bene Kirschke, Jan S. Wiest, Roland Montagnon, Emmanuel Letourneau-Guillon, Laurent Galdran, Adrian Galati, Francesco Falcetta, Daniele Zuluaga, Maria A. Lin, Chaolong Zhao, Haoran Zhang, Zehan Ra, Sinyoung Hwang, Jongyun Park, Hyunjin Chen, Junqiang Wodzinski, Marek Müller, Henning Shi, Pengcheng Liu, Wei Ma, Ting Yalçin, Cansu Hamadache, Rachika E. Salvi, Joaquim Llado, Xavier Estrada, Uma Maria Lal-Trehan Abramova, Valeriia Giancardo, Luca Oliver, Arnau Liu, Jialu Huang, Haibin Cui, Yue Lin, Zehang Liu, Yusheng Zhu, Shunzhi Patel, Tatsat R. Tutino, Vincent M. Orouskhani, Maysam Wang, Huayu Mossa-Basha, Mahmud Zhu, Chengcheng Rokuss, Maximilian R. Kirchhoff, Yannick Disch, Nico Holzschuh, Julius Isensee, Fabian Maier-Hein, Klaus Sato, Yuki Hirsch, Sven Wegener, Susanne Menze, Bjoern Department of Quantitative Biomedicine University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland Center for Computational Health Zurich University of Applied Sciences Zurich Switzerland Department of Neuroradiology University Hospital of Zurich Zurich Switzerland Department of Neurosurgery Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Wuhan China Department of Computing Imperial College London London United Kingdom Helmholtz Center Munich Germany Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging Harvard Medical School Boston United States School of Medicine Technical University of Munich Munich Germany Department of Informatics Technical University of Munich Munich Germany Helmholtz AI Helmholtz Munich Munich Germany Image Sciences Institute UMC Utrecht Utrecht Netherlands Department of Neurology UMC Utrecht Utrecht Netherlands Department of Radiology UMC Utrecht Utrecht Netherlands Department of Clinical Neurosciences Division of Neurosurgery Geneva University Hospitals Geneva Switzerland Department of Neurology University Hospital of Zurich Zurich Switzerland Department of Physiology University of Toronto Toronto Canada Department of Neurosurgery University Hospital of Zurich Zurich Switzerland Department of Diagnostic Imaging National University Hospital Singapore Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology University Hospital Berne University of Berne Berne Switzerland Montreal Canada Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona Spain EURECOM Biot France Institute of Medical Technology Peking University Health Science Center Beijing China Hangzhou Genlight Medtech Co. Ltd. Hangzhou China Department of Artificial Intelligence Sungkyunkwan University Seoul Korea Republic of Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Sungkyunkwan University Seoul Korea Republic of Shanghai MediWorks Precision Instruments Co. Ltd. Shanghai China Institute of Informatics HES-SO Valais-Wallis Switzerland Department of Measurement and Electronics AGH University

The Circle of Willis (CoW) is an important network of arteries connecting major circulations of the brain. Its vascular architecture is believed to affect the risk, severity, and clinical outcome of serious neuro-vascular diseases. However, characterizing the highly variable CoW anatomy is still a manual and time-consuming expert task. The CoW is usually imaged by two angiographic imaging modalities, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and computed tomography angiography (CTA), but there exist limited public datasets with annotations on CoW anatomy, especially for CTA. Therefore we organized the TopCoW Challenge in 2023 with the release of an annotated CoW dataset. The TopCoW dataset was the first public dataset with voxel-level annotations for thirteen possible CoW vessel components, enabled by virtual-reality (VR) technology. It was also the first large dataset with paired MRA and CTA from the same patients. TopCoW challenge formalized the CoW characterization problem as a multiclass anatomical segmentation task with an emphasis on topological metrics. We invited submissions worldwide for the CoW segmentation task, which attracted over 140 registered participants from four continents. The top performing teams managed to segment many CoW components to Dice scores around 90%, but with lower scores for communicating arteries and rare variants. There were also topological mistakes for predictions with high Dice scores. Additional topological analysis revealed further areas for improvement in detecting certain CoW components and matching CoW variant topology accurately. TopCoW represented a first attempt at benchmarking the CoW anatomical segmentation task for MRA and CTA, both morphologically and topologically. © 2023, CC BY-NC-ND.

关键词： Large datasets

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge 2024: Meningioma Radiotherapy Planning Automated Segmentation

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2024年

作者： LaBella, Dominic Schumacher, Katherine Mix, Michael Leu, Kevin McBurney-Lin, Shan Nedelec, Pierre Villanueva-Meyer, Javier Shapey, Jonathan Vercauteren, Tom Chia, Kazumi Ivory, Marina Barfoot, Theodore Al-Salihi, Omar Leu, Justin Halasz, Lia Velichko, Yury Wang, Chunhao Kirkpatrick, John Floyd, Scott Reitman, Zachary J. Mullikin, Trey Bagci, Ulas Sachdev, Sean Hattangadi-Gluth, Jona A. Seibert, Tyler M. Farid, Nikdokht Puett, Connor Pease, Matthew W. Shiue, Kevin Anwar, Syed Muhammad Faghani, Shahriar Taylor, Peter Haider, Muhammad Ammar Warman, Pranav Albrecht, Jake Jakab, András Moassefi, Mana Chung, Verena Aristizabal, Alejandro Karargyris, Alexandros Kassem, Hasan Pati, Sarthak Sheller, Micah Coley, Aaron Huang, Christina Ghanta, Siddharth Schneider, Alex Sharp, Conrad Saluja, Rachit Kofler, Florian Lohmann, Philipp Vollmuth, Phillipp Gagnon, Louis Adewole, Maruf Li, Hongwei Bran Kazerooni, Anahita Fathi Tahon, Nourel Hoda Anazodo, Udunna Moawad, Ahmed W. Menze, Bjoern Linguraru, Marius George Aboian, Mariam Wiestler, Benedikt Baid, Ujjwal Conte, Gian-Marco Rauschecker, Andreas M. Nada, Ayman Abayazeed, Aly H. Huang, Raymond de Verdier, Maria Correia Rudie, Jeffrey D. Bakas, Spyridon Calabrese, Evan Department of Radiation Oncology Duke University Medical Center DurhamNC United States Department of Radiation Oncology SUNY Upstate Medical University SyracuseNY United States San FranciscoCA United States Department of Neurosurgery King’s College Hospital London United Kingdom School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences King’s College London London United Kingdom Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust United Kingdom Department of Radiation Oncology University of Washington SeattleWA United States Department of Radiology Northwestern University EvanstonIL United States Department of Radiation Oncology Northwestern University EvanstonIL United States Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences University of California San Diego La Jolla CA United States Department of Radiology University of California San Diego La Jolla CA United States Department of Bioengineering University of California San Diego La Jolla CA United States Department of Neurological Surgery Indiana University School of Medicine IndianapolisIN United States Department of Radiation Oncology Indiana University IndianapolisIN United States Children’s National Hospital WashingtonDC United States George Washington University WashingtonDC United States Mayo Clinic RochesterMN United States CMH Lahore Medical College Lahore Pakistan Duke University Medical Center School of Medicine DurhamNC United States Sage Bionetworks United States University of Zürich Zürich Switzerland Artificial Intelligence Lab Department of Radiology Mayo Clinic RochesterMN United States MLCommons United States Factored AI United States Center For Federated Learning in Medicine Indiana University IndianapolisIN United States Division of Computational Pathology Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine IndianapolisIN United States Medical Working Group MLCommons San FranciscoCA United States Intel United States Duke Universi

The 2024 Brain Tumor Segmentation Meningioma Radiotherapy (BraTS-MEN-RT) challenge aims to advance automated segmentation algorithms using the largest known multi-institutional dataset of 750 radiotherapy planning brain MRIs with expert-annotated target labels for patients with intact or postoperative meningioma that underwent either conventional external beam radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery. Each case includes a defaced 3D post-contrast T1-weighted radiotherapy planning MRI in its native acquisition space, accompanied by a single-label "target volume" representing the gross tumor volume (GTV) and any at-risk postoperative site. Target volume annotations adhere to established radiotherapy planning protocols, ensuring consistency across cases and institutions. For preoperative meningiomas, the target volume encompasses the entire GTV and associated nodular dural tail, while for postoperative cases, it includes at-risk resection cavity margins as determined by the treating institution. Case annotations were reviewed and approved by expert neuroradiologists and radiation oncologists. Participating teams will develop, containerize, and evaluate automated segmentation models using this comprehensive dataset. Model performance will be assessed using an adapted lesion-wise Dice Similarity Coefficient and the 95% Hausdorff distance. The top-performing teams will be recognized at the Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention Conference in October 2024. BraTS-MEN-RT is expected to significantly advance automated radiotherapy planning by enabling precise tumor segmentation and facilitating tailored treatment, ultimately improving patient outcomes. © 2024, CC BY.

关键词： Radiotherapy

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

An Early Stage Researcher's Primer on Systems Medicine Terminology

Network and Systems Medicine

引用

Network and Systems Medicine 2021年第1期4卷 2-50页

作者： Zanin, Massimiliano Aitya, Nadim A.A. Basilio, José Baumbach, Jan Benis, Arriel Behera, Chandan K. Bucholc, Magda Castiglione, Filippo Chouvarda, Ioanna Comte, Blandine Dao, Tien-Tuan Ding, Xuemei Pujos-Guillot, Estelle Filipovic, Nenad Finn, David P. Glass, David H. Harel, Nissim Iesmantas, Tomas Ivanoska, Ilinka Joshi, Alok Boudjeltia, Karim Zouaoui Kaoui, Badr Kaur, Daman Maguire, Liam P. McClean, Paula L. McCombe, Niamh De Miranda, João Luís Moisescu, Mihnea Alexandru Pappalardo, Francesco Polster, Annikka Prasad, Girijesh Rozman, Damjana Sacala, Ioan Sanchez-Bornot, Jose M. Schmid, Johannes A. Sharp, Trevor Solé-Casals, Jordi Spiwok, Vojtěch Spyrou, George M. Stalidzans, Egils Stres, Blaa Sustersic, Tijana Symeonidis, Ioannis Tieri, Paolo Todd, Stephen Van Steen, Kristel Veneva, Milena Wang, Da-Hui Wang, Haiying Wang, Hui Watterson, Steven Wong-Lin, Kongfatt Yang, Su Zou, Xin Schmidt, Harald H.H.W. Centro de Tecnología Biomédica Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Madrid Spain Intelligent Systems Research Centre School of Computing Engineering and Intelligent Systems Ulster University Ulster United Kingdom Center for Physiology and Pharmacology Institute of Vascular Biology and Thrombosis Research Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan Technical University of Munich Freising Germany Holon Israel CNR National Research Council IAC Institute for Applied Computing Rome Italy Lab of Computing Medical Informatics and Biomedical Imaging Technologies School of Medicine Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Thessaloniki Greece Université Clermont Auvergne INRAE UNH Plateforme d'Exploration du Métabolisme MetaboHUB Clermont Clermont-Ferrand France Université de Technologie de Compiègne Compiègne France Labex MS2T Control of Technological Systems-of-Systems CNRS and Université de Technologie de Compiègne Compiègne France Faculty of Engineering University of Kragujevac Kragujevac Serbia Kragujevac Serbia Steinbeis Advanced Risk Technologies Institute Doo Kragujevac Kragujevac Serbia Pharmacology and Therapeutics School of Medicine Galway Neuroscience Centre National University of Ireland Galway Ireland School of Computing Ulster University Ulster United Kingdom Holon Israel Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Kaunas University of Technology Kaunas Lithuania Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering Ss. Cyril and Methodius University Skopje Macedonia Medicine Faculty Université Libre de Bruxelles CHU de Charleroi Charleroi Belgium Northern Ireland Centre for Stratified Medicine Biomedical Sciences Research Institute Ulster University Ulster United Kingdom Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão Instituto Politécnico de Portalegre Portalegre Portugal Instituto Superior Técnico Universidade de Lisboa Lisboa Portugal Faculty of Automatic Control and Computers University Politehnica of B

Background: Systems Medicine is a novel approach to medicine, that is, an interdisciplinary field that considers the human body as a system, composed of multiple parts and of complex relationships at multiple levels, and further integrated into an environment. Exploring Systems Medicine implies understanding and combining concepts coming from diametral different fields, including medicine, biology, statistics, modeling and simulation, and data science. Such heterogeneity leads to semantic issues, which may slow down implementation and fruitful interaction between these highly diverse fields. Methods: In this review, we collect and explain more than100 terms related to Systems Medicine. These include both modeling and data science terms and basic systems medicine terms, along with some synthetic definitions, examples of applications, and lists of relevant references. Results: This glossary aims at being a first aid kit for the Systems Medicine researcher facing an unfamiliar term, where he/she can get a first understanding of them, and, more importantly, examples and references for digging into the topic. © Massimiliano Zanin et al., 2021;Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2021.

关键词： Semantics

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

biomedical image analysis competitions: The state of current participation practice

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2022年

作者： Eisenmann, Matthias Reinke, Annika Weru, Vivienn Tizabi, Minu Dietlinde Isensee, Fabian Adler, Tim J. Godau, Patrick Cheplygina, Veronika Kozubek, Michal Maier-Hein, Klaus Jäger, Paul F. Kopp-Schneider, Annette Maier-Hein, Lena Ali, Sharib Gupta, Anubha Kybic, Jan Noble, Alison de Solórzano, Carlos Ortiz Pachade, Samiksha Petitjean, Caroline Sage, Daniel Wei, Donglai Wilden, Elizabeth Alapatt, Deepak Andrearczyk, Vincent Baid, Ujjwal Bakas, Spyridon Balu, Niranjan Bano, Sophia Bawa, Vivek Singh Bernal, Jorge Bodenstedt, Sebastian Casella, Alessandro Choi, Jinwook Commowick, Olivier Daum, Marie Depeursinge, Adrien Dorent, Reuben Egger, Jan Eichhorn, Hannah Engelhardt, Sandy Ganz, Melanie Girard, Gabriel Hansen, Lasse Heinrich, Mattias Heller, Nicholas Hering, Alessa Huaulmé, Arnaud Kim, Hyunjeong Li, Hongwei Bran Landman, Bennett Li, Jianning Ma, Jun Martel, Anne Martín-Isla, Carlos Menze, Bjoern Nwoye, Chinedu Innocent Oreiller, Valentin Padoy, Nicolas Pati, Sarthak Payette, Kelly Sudre, Carole van Wijnen, Kimberlin Vardazaryan, Armine Vercauteren, Tom Wagner, Martin Wang, Chuanbo Yap, Moi Hoon Yu, Zeyun Yuan, Chun Zenk, Maximilian Zia, Aneeq Zimmerer, David Bao, Rina Choi, Chanyeol Cohen, Andrew Dzyubachyk, Oleh Galdran, Adrian Gan, Tianyuan Guo, Tianqi Gupta, Pradyumna Haithami, Mahmood Ho, Edward Jang, Ikbeom Li, Zhili Luo, Zhengbo Lux, Filip Makrogiannis, Sokratis Müller, Dominik Oh, Young-Tack Pang, Subeen Pape, Constantin Polat, Gorkem Reed, Charlotte Rosalie Ryu, Kanghyun Scherr, Tim Thambawita, Vajira Wang, Haoyu Wang, Xinliang Xu, Kele Yeh, Hung Yeo, Doyeob Yuan, Yixuan Zeng, Yan Zhao, Xin Abbing, Julian Adam, Jannes Adluru, Nagesh Agethen, Niklas Ahmed, Salman Al Khalil, Yasmina Alenyà, Mireia Alhoniemi, Esa An, Chengyang Arega, Tewodros Weldebirhan Avisdris, Netanell Aydogan, Dogu Baran Bai, Yingbin Calisto, Maria Baldeon Basaran, Berke Doga Beetz, Marcel Bian, Hao Blansit, Kevin Bloch, Louise Bohnsack, Robert Bosticardo, Sara Breen, Jack Brudfors, Mikael Brüngel, Raphael Cabezas, Mariano Cacciola, Alb Heidelberg Division of Intelligent Medical Systems Germany Heidelberg HI Helmholtz Imaging Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Heidelberg Division of Biostatistics Germany Heidelberg Division of Medical Image Computing Germany Heidelberg HI Applied Vision Lab Germany IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic Heidelberg Interactive Machine Learning Group Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science and Medical Faculty Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany NCT Heidelberg DKFZ University Hospital Heidelberg Germany School of Computing University of Leeds Leeds United Kingdom SBILab Department of ECE IIIT-Delhi India Faculty of Electrical Engineering Czech Technical University Prague Czech Republic Institute of Biomedical Engineering University of Oxford United Kingdom Center for Applied Medical Research Pamplona Spain Shri Guru Gobind Singhji Institute of Engineering and Technology Maharashtra Nanded India Université de Rouen Normandie France Lausanne Switzerland School of Engineering and Applied Science Harvard University United States ICube University of Strasbourg CNRS France Institute of Informatics School of Management HES-SO Valais-Wallis University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland Techno-Pôle 3 Sierre3960 Switzerland Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Lausanne University Hospital Rue du Bugnon 46 LausanneCH-1011 Switzerland University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology University of Washington United States Wellcome EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences University College London London United Kingdom Visual Artificial Intelligence Lab Oxford Brookes University Oxford United Kingdom Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona & Computer Vision Center Spain Dresden Fetscherstraße 74 PF 64 Dresden01307 Germany

The number of international benchmarking competitions is steadily increasing in various fields of machine learning (ML) research and practice. So far, however, little is known about the common practice as well as bottlenecks faced by the community in tackling the research questions posed. To shed light on the status quo of algorithm development in the specific field of biomedical imaging analysis, we designed an international survey that was issued to all participants of challenges conducted in conjunction with the IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021 conferences (80 competitions in total). The survey covered participants' expertise and working environments, their chosen strategies, as well as algorithm characteristics. A median of 72% challenge participants took part in the survey. According to our results, knowledge exchange was the primary incentive (70%) for participation, while the reception of prize money played only a minor role (16%). While a median of 80 working hours was spent on method development, a large portion of participants stated that they did not have enough time for method development (32%). 25% perceived the infrastructure to be a bottleneck. Overall, 94% of all solutions were deep learning-based. Of these, 84% were based on standard architectures. 43% of the respondents reported that the data samples (e.g., images) were too large to be processed at once. This was most commonly addressed by patch-based training (69%), downsampling (37%), and solving 3D analysis tasks as a series of 2D tasks. K-fold cross-validation on the training set was performed by only 37% of the participants and only 50% of the participants performed ensembling based on multiple identical models (61%) or heterogeneous models (39%). 48% of the respondents applied postprocessing steps. © 2022, CC BY.

关键词： Benchmarking

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Forecasting intracranial hypertension using multi-scale waveform metrics

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2019年

作者： Hüser, Matthias Kündig, Adrian Karlen, Walter De Luca, Valeria Jaggi, Martin Biomedical Informatics Group Department of Computer Science ETH Zürich Universitätstrasse 6 Zürich8092 Switzerland Mobile Health Systems Lab Institute of Robotics and Intelligent Systems Department of Health Sciences and Technology ETH Zürich Zürich8008 Switzerland Department of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering ETH Zürich Zürich8092 Switzerland Machine Learning & Optimization Lab EPFL Lausanne1015 Switzerland

Objective: Acute intracranial hypertension is an important risk factor of secondary brain damage after traumatic brain injury. Hypertensive episodes are often diagnosed reactively, leading to late detection and lost time for intervention planning. A pro-active approach that predicts critical events several hours ahead of time could assist in directing attention to patients at risk. Approach: We developed a prediction framework that forecasts onsets of acute intracranial hypertension in the next 8 hours. It jointly uses cerebral auto-regulation indices, spectral energies and morphological pulse metrics to describe the neurological state of the patient. One-minute base windows were compressed by computing signal metrics, and then stored in a multi-scale history, from which physiological features were derived. Main results: Our model predicted events up to 8 hours in advance with alarm recall rates of 90% at a precision of 30.3% in the MIMIC-III waveform database, improving upon two baselines from the literature. We found that features derived from high-frequency waveforms substantially improved the prediction performance over simple statistical summaries of low-frequency time serie1s, and each of the three feature classes contributed to the performance gain. The inclusion of long-term history up to 8 hours was especially important. Significance: Our results highlight the importance of information contained in high-frequency waveforms in the neurological intensive care unit. They could motivate future studies on pre-hypertensive patterns and the design of new alarm algorithms for critical events in the injured brain. Copyright © 2019, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Morphology

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Modern applications of machine learning in quantum sciences

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2022年

作者： Dawid, Anna Arnold, Julian Requena, Borja Gresch, Alexander Plodzien, Marcin Donatella, Kaelan Nicoli, Kim A. Stornati, Paolo Koch, Rouven Büttner, Miriam Okula, Robert Muñoz–Gil, Gorka Vargas–Hernández, Rodrigo A. Cervera-Lierta, Alba Carrasquilla, Juan Dunjko, Vedran Gabrié, Marylou Huembeli, Patrick van Nieuwenburg, Evert Vicentini, Filippo Wang, Lei Wetzel, Sebastian J. Carleo, Giuseppe Greplová, Eliška Krems, Roman Marquardt, Florian Tomza, Michal Lewenstein, Maciej Dauphin, Alexandre Faculty of Physics University of Warsaw Poland ICFO - Institut de Ciències Fotòniques The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology Castelldefels Barcelona08860 Spain Center for Computational Quantum Physics Flatiron Institute New York United States Department of Physics University of Basel Switzerland Institute for Theoretical Physics Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf Germany Institute for Quantum Inspired and Quantum Optimization Hamburg University of Technology Germany Université de Paris CNRS Laboratoire Matériaux et Phénomènes Quantiques France Machine Learning Group Technische Universität Berlin Germany BIFOLD Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data Berlin10587 Germany Department of Applied Physics Aalto University Espoo Finland Institute of Physics Albert-Ludwig University of Freiburg Germany International Centre for Theory of Quantum Technologies University of Gdańsk Poland Department of Algorithms and System Modeling Faculty of Electronics Faculty of Electronics Telecommunications and Informatics Gdańsk University of Technology Poland Institute for Theoretical Physics University of Innsbruck Austria Department of Chemistry University of Toronto Canada Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence MaRS Centre Toronto Canada Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology McMaster University Hamilton Canada Barcelona Supercomputing Center Spain LIACS Leiden University Netherlands CMAP École Polytechnique France Switzerland Menten AI Inc. Palo AltoCA United States Niels Bohr Institute Copenhagen Denmark CPHT CNRS École Polytechnique Institut Polytechnique de Paris PalaiseauF-91128 France Beijing National Lab for Condensed Matter Physics Institute of Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory Dongguan China Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics Waterloo Canada Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft University of Technology DelftNL-2600 GA Netherlands Department of

In this book, we provide a comprehensive introduction to the most recentadvances in the application of machine learning methods in quantum sciences. Wecover the use of deep learning and kernel methods in supervised, unsupervised,and reinforcement learning algorithms for phase classification, representationof many-body quantum states, quantum feedback control, and quantum circuitsoptimization. Moreover, we introduce and discuss more specialized topics suchas differentiable programming, generative models, statistical approach tomachine learning, and quantum machine learning. © 2022, CC BY.

关键词： Deep learning

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Towards collaborative data science in mental health research: The ECNP neuroimaging network accessible data repository

Neuroscience Applied

引用

Neuroscience Applied 2025年 4卷

作者： Khuntia, Adyasha Buciuman, Madalina-Octavia Fanning, John Stolicyn, Aleks Vetter, Clara Armio, Reetta-Liina From, Tiina Goffi, Federica Hahn, Lisa Kaufmann, Tobias Laurikainen, Heikki Maggioni, Eleonora Martinez-Zalacain, Ignacio Ruef, Anne Dong, Mark Sen Schwarz, Emanuel Squarcina, Letizia Andreassen, Ole Bellani, Marcella Brambilla, Paolo Haren, Neeltje van Hietala, Jarmo Lawrie, Stephen M. Soriano-Mas, Carles Whalley, Heather Taquet, Maxime Meisenzahl, Eva Falkai, Peter Wiegand, Ariane Koutsouleris, Nikolaos Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy University Hospital Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich Germany International Max-Planck School for Translational Psychiatry Germany Max-Planck Institute of Psychiatry Munich Munich Germany Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry Munich Germany German Center for Mental Health Partner Site Munich Augsburg Germany Division of Psychiatry Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences University of Edinburgh Scotland Edinburgh United Kingdom Munich Center of Machine Learning Munich Germany Helmholtz Association - Munich School for Data Science Munich Germany Department of Psychiatry University of Turku Turku Finland Turku PET Centre University of Turku Turku Finland Turku University Hospital Turku Finland Department of Electronics Information and Bioengineering Politecnico di Milano Milan Italy Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico University of Milan Milan Italy NORMENT Centre Division of Mental Health and Addiction Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy University of Tübingen Germany German Center for Mental Health Partner Site Tübingen Germany Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute-IDIBELL Psychiatry Department Bellvitge University Hospital CIBERSAM and Department of Psychobiology and Methodology of Health Sciences Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Spain Department of Radiology Bellvitge University Hospital Barcelona Spain Hector Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry Central Institute of Mental Health Medical Faculty Mannheim Heidelberg University Mannheim Germany Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Central Institute of Mental Health Medical Faculty Mannheim Heidelberg University Mannheim Germany German Center for Mental Health Partner Site Mannheim-Heidelberg-Ulm Germany Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation University of Milan Milan Italy Section of Psychiatry Dept of Neuroscience

The current biologically uninformed psychiatric taxonomy complicates optimal diagnosis and treatment. Neuroimaging-based machine learning methods hold promise for tackling these issues, but large-scale, representative cohorts are required for building robust and generalizable models. The European College of Neuropsychopharmacology Neuroimaging Network Accessible data Repository (ECNP-NNADR) addresses this need by collating multi-site, multi-modal, multi-diagnosis datasets that enable collaborative research. The newly established ECNP-NNADR includes 4829 participants across 21 cohorts and 11 distinct psychiatric diagnoses, available via the Virtual Pooling and Analysis of Research data (ViPAR) software. The repository includes demographic and clinical information, including diagnosis and questionnaires evaluating psychiatric symptomatology, as well as multi-atlas grey matter volume regions of interest (ROI). To illustrate the opportunities offered by the repository, two proof-of-concept analyses were performed: (1) multivariate classification of 498 patients with schizophrenia (SZ) and 498 matched healthy control (HC) individuals, and (2) normative age prediction using 1170 HC individuals with subsequent application of this model to study abnormal brain maturational processes in patients with SZ. In the SZ classification task, we observed varying balanced accuracies, reaching a maximum of 71.13% across sites and atlases. The normative-age model demonstrated a mean absolute error (MAE) of 6.95 years [coefficient of determination (R²) = 0.77, P < .001] across sites and atlases. The model demonstrated robust generalization on a separate HC left-out sample achieving a MAE of 7.16 years [R² = 0.74,P < .001]. When applied to the SZ group, the model exhibited a MAE of 7.79 years [R² = 0.79, P < .001], with patients displaying accelerated brain-aging with a brain age gap (BrainAGE) of 4.49 (8.90) years. Conclusively, this novel multi-site, mu

关键词： data repository machine learning Multi-site data Neuroimaging Psychiatry Structural MRI Transdiagnostic

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Reading race: AI recognizes patient's racial identity in medical images

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2021年

作者： Banerjee, I. Bhimireddy, A.R. Burns, J.L. Celi, L.A. Chen, L. Correa, R. Dullerud, N. Ghassemi, M. Gichoya, J.W. Huang, S. Kuo, P. Lungren, M.P. Price, B.J. Purkayastha, S. Pyrros, A.A. Oakden-Rayner, L. Okechukwu, C. Seyyed-Kalantari, L. Trivedi, H. Wang, R. Zaiman, Z. Zhang, H. Department of Biomedical Informatics Emory University 100 Woodruff Circle AtlantaGA30322 United States School of Informatics and Computing Indiana University Purdue University 535 W Michigan St. IT 475E IndianapolisIN46202 United States Institute for Medical Engineering and Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology 45 Carleton Street E25- 330 CambridgeMA02142 United States Department of Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center 330 Brookline Avenue BostonMA02215 United States Department of Computer Science National Tsing Hua University No. 101 Section 2 Kuang-Fu Road Hsinchu30013 Taiwan Department of Computer Science Emory University 201 Dowman Drive AtlantaGA30322 United States Department of Computer Science University of Toronto 214 College St TorontoONM5T 3A1 Canada Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue CambridgeMA02139 United States Department of Radiology Emory University 1364 Clifton Rd AtlantaGA30322 United States Stanford University School of Medicine 291 Campus Drive Palo AltoCA94305 United States Florida State University College of Medicine 1115 W Call St TallahasseeFL32304 United States Australian Institute for Machine Learning University of Adelaide AIML Building Lot Fourteen Cnr North Terrace and Frome Road AdelaideSA5000 Australia Department of Computer Science Georgia Institute of Technology 266 Ferst Drive AtlantaGA30332 United States Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute Sinai Health 600 University Ave TorontoONM5G 1X5 Canada Dupage Medical Group 40 S Clay St HinsdaleIL60521 United States

Background: In medical imaging, prior studies have demonstrated disparate AI performance by race, yet there is no known correlation for race on medical imaging that would be obvious to the human expert interpreting the images. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation of AI's ability to recognize patient's racial identity from medical images. Methods: Using private and public datasets we evaluate: A) performance quantification of deep learning models to detect race from medical images, including the ability of these models to generalize to external environments and across multiple imaging modalities, B) assessment of possible confounding anatomic and phenotype population features, such as disease distribution and body habitus as predictors of race, and C) investigation into the underlying mechanism by which AI models can recognize race. Findings: Standard deep learning models can be trained to predict race from medical images with high performance across multiple imaging modalities. Our findings hold under external validation conditions, as well as when models are optimized to perform clinically motivated tasks. We demonstrate this detection is not due to trivial proxies or imaging-related surrogate covariates for race, such as underlying disease distribution. Finally, we show that performance persists over all anatomical regions and frequency spectrum of the images suggesting that mitigation efforts will be challenging and demand further study. Interpretation: We emphasize that model ability to predict self-reported race is itself not the issue of importance. However, our findings that AI can trivially predict self-reported race - even from corrupted, cropped, and noised medical images - in a setting where clinical experts cannot, creates an enormous risk for all model deployments in medical imaging: if an AI model secretly used its knowledge of self-reported race to misclassify all Black patients, radiologists would not be able to tell using the same data the model ha

关键词： Medical imaging

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Analysis of the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2024年

作者： LaBella, Dominic Baid, Ujjwal Khanna, Omaditya McBurney-Lin, Shan McLean, Ryan Nedelec, Pierre Rashid, Arif Tahon, Nourel Hoda Altes, Talissa Bhalerao, Radhika Dhemesh, Yaseen Godfrey, Devon Hilal, Fathi Floyd, Scott Janas, Anastasia Kazerooni, Anahita Fathi Kirkpatrick, John Kent, Collin Kofler, Florian Leu, Kevin Maleki, Nazanin Menze, Bjoern Pajot, Maxence Reitman, Zachary J. Rudie, Jeffrey D. Saluja, Rachit Velichko, Yury Wang, Chunhao Warman, Pranav Adewole, Maruf Albrecht, Jake Anazodo, Udunna Anwar, Syed Muhammad Bergquist, Timothy Chen, Sully Francis Chung, Verena Conte, Gian-Marco Dako, Farouk Eddy, James Ezhov, Ivan Khalili, Nastaran Iglesias, Juan Eugenio Jiang, Zhifan Johanson, Elaine Van Leemput, Koen Li, Hongwei Bran Linguraru, Marius George Liu, Xinyang Mahtabfar, Aria Meier, Zeke Moawad, Ahmed W. Mongan, John Piraud, Marie Shinohara, Russell Takeshi Wiggins, Walter F. Abayazeed, Aly H. Akinola, Rachel Jakab, András Bilello, Michel de Verdier, Maria Correia Crivellaro, Priscila Davatzikos, Christos Farahani, Keyvan Freymann, John Hess, Christopher Huang, Raymond Lohmann, Philipp Moassefi, Mana Pease, Matthew W. Vollmuth, Phillipp Sollmann, Nico Diffley, David Nandolia, Khanak K. Warren, Daniel I. Hussain, Ali Fehringer, Pascal Bronstein, Yulia Deptula, Lisa Stein, Evan G. Taherzadeh, Mahsa de Oliveira, Eduardo Portela Haughey, Aoife Kontzialis, Marinos Saba, Luca Turner, Benjamin Brüßeler, Melanie M.T. Ansari, Shehbaz Gkampenis, Athanasios Weiss, David Maximilian Mansour, Aya Shawali, Islam H. Yordanov, Nikolay Stein, Joel M. Hourani, Roula Moshebah, Mohammed Yahya Abouelatta, Ahmed Magdy Rizvi, Tanvir Willms, Klara Martin, Dann C. Okar, Abdullah D'Anna, Gennaro Taha, Ahmed Sharifi, Yasaman Faghani, Shahriar Kite, Dominic Pinho, Marco Haider, Muhammad Ammar Aristizabal, Alejandro Karargyris, Alexandros Kassem, Hasan Pati, Sarthak Sheller, Micah Alonso-Basanta, Michelle Villanueva-Meyer, Javier Rauschecker, Andreas M. Nada, Ayman Aboian, Mariam Flanders, Adam E. Wiestler, Benedikt Bakas, Spyridon Ca Duke University Medical Center Department of Radiation Oncology DurhamNC United States Division of Computational Pathology Department of Pathology Laboratory Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine IndianapolisIN United States Center for Federated Learning in Medicine Indiana University IndianapolisIN United States Department of Neurosurgery Thomas Jefferson University PhiladelphiaPA United States University of California San FranciscoCA United States Yale University New HavenCT United States Department of Radiation Oncology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States University of Missouri ColumbiaMO United States Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science Indiana University School of Medicine IndianapolisIN United States Children's Hospital of Philadelphia University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Helmholtz AI Helmholtz Munich Germany Department of Informatics Technical University Munich Germany TranslaTUM - Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research Technical University of Munich Germany Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology School of Medicine Klinikum rechts der Isar Technical University of Munich Germany San FranciscoCA United States Biomedical Image Analysis and Machine Learning Department of Quantitative Biomedicine University of Zurich Switzerland Department of Neuroradiology Technical University of Munich Munich Germany University of San Diego CA United States Cornell University IthacaNY United States Department of Radiology Northwestern University EvanstonIL United States Duke University Medical Center School of Medicine DurhamNC United States Lab Crestview Radiology Lagos Nigeria Sage Bionetworks United States McGill University MontrealQC Canada Children's National Hospital WashingtonDC United States George Washington University WashingtonDC United State

We describe the design and results from the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge. The BraTS Meningioma Challenge differed from prior BraTS Glioma challenges in that it focused on meningiomas, which are typically benign extra-axial tumors with diverse radiologic and anatomical presentation and a propensity for multiplicity. Nine participating teams each developed deep-learning automated segmentation models using image data from the largest multi-institutional systematically expert annotated multilabel multi-sequence meningioma MRI dataset to date, which included 1000 training set cases, 141 validation set cases, and 283 hidden test set cases. Each case included T2, T2/FLAIR, T1, and T1Gd brain MRI sequences with associated tumor compartment labels delineating enhancing tumor, non-enhancing tumor, and surrounding non-enhancing T2/FLAIR hyperintensity. Participant automated segmentation models were evaluated and ranked based on a scoring system evaluating lesion-wise metrics including dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff Distance. The top ranked team had a lesion-wise median dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.976, 0.976, and 0.964 for enhancing tumor, tumor core, and whole tumor, respectively and a corresponding average DSC of 0.899, 0.904, and 0.871, respectively. These results serve as state-of-the-art benchmarks for future pre-operative meningioma automated segmentation algorithms. Additionally, we found that 1286 of 1424 cases (90.3%) had at least 1 compartment voxel abutting the edge of the skull-stripped image edge, which requires further investigation into optimal pre-processing face anonymization steps. © 2024, CC BY.

关键词： Tumors

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：