检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

Network and Systems Medicine 2021年第1期4卷 2-50页

作者： Zanin, Massimiliano Aitya, Nadim A.A. Basilio, José Baumbach, Jan Benis, Arriel Behera, Chandan K. Bucholc, Magda Castiglione, Filippo Chouvarda, Ioanna Comte, Blandine Dao, Tien-Tuan Ding, Xuemei Pujos-Guillot, Estelle Filipovic, Nenad Finn, David P. Glass, David H. Harel, Nissim Iesmantas, Tomas Ivanoska, Ilinka Joshi, Alok Boudjeltia, Karim Zouaoui Kaoui, Badr Kaur, Daman Maguire, Liam P. McClean, Paula L. McCombe, Niamh De Miranda, João Luís Moisescu, Mihnea Alexandru Pappalardo, Francesco Polster, Annikka Prasad, Girijesh Rozman, Damjana Sacala, Ioan Sanchez-Bornot, Jose M. Schmid, Johannes A. Sharp, Trevor Solé-Casals, Jordi Spiwok, Vojtěch Spyrou, George M. Stalidzans, Egils Stres, Blaa Sustersic, Tijana Symeonidis, Ioannis Tieri, Paolo Todd, Stephen Van Steen, Kristel Veneva, Milena Wang, Da-Hui Wang, Haiying Wang, Hui Watterson, Steven Wong-Lin, Kongfatt Yang, Su Zou, Xin Schmidt, Harald H.H.W. Centro de Tecnología Biomédica Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Madrid Spain Intelligent Systems Research Centre School of Computing Engineering and Intelligent Systems Ulster University Ulster United Kingdom Center for Physiology and Pharmacology Institute of Vascular Biology and Thrombosis Research Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan Technical University of Munich Freising Germany Holon Israel CNR National Research Council IAC Institute for Applied Computing Rome Italy Lab of Computing Medical Informatics and Biomedical Imaging Technologies School of Medicine Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Thessaloniki Greece Université Clermont Auvergne INRAE UNH Plateforme d'Exploration du Métabolisme MetaboHUB Clermont Clermont-Ferrand France Université de Technologie de Compiègne Compiègne France Labex MS2T Control of Technological Systems-of-Systems CNRS and Université de Technologie de Compiègne Compiègne France Faculty of Engineering University of Kragujevac Kragujevac Serbia Kragujevac Serbia Steinbeis Advanced Risk Technologies Institute Doo Kragujevac Kragujevac Serbia Pharmacology and Therapeutics School of Medicine Galway Neuroscience Centre National University of Ireland Galway Ireland School of Computing Ulster University Ulster United Kingdom Holon Israel Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Kaunas University of Technology Kaunas Lithuania Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering Ss. Cyril and Methodius University Skopje Macedonia Medicine Faculty Université Libre de Bruxelles CHU de Charleroi Charleroi Belgium Northern Ireland Centre for Stratified Medicine Biomedical Sciences Research Institute Ulster University Ulster United Kingdom Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão Instituto Politécnico de Portalegre Portalegre Portugal Instituto Superior Técnico Universidade de Lisboa Lisboa Portugal Faculty of Automatic Control and Computers University Politehnica of B

Background: Systems Medicine is a novel approach to medicine, that is, an interdisciplinary field that considers the human body as a system, composed of multiple parts and of complex relationships at multiple levels, and further integrated into an environment. Exploring Systems Medicine implies understanding and combining concepts coming from diametral different fields, including medicine, biology, statistics, modeling and simulation, and data science. Such heterogeneity leads to semantic issues, which may slow down implementation and fruitful interaction between these highly diverse fields. Methods: In this review, we collect and explain more than100 terms related to Systems Medicine. These include both modeling and data science terms and basic systems medicine terms, along with some synthetic definitions, examples of applications, and lists of relevant references. Results: This glossary aims at being a first aid kit for the Systems Medicine researcher facing an unfamiliar term, where he/she can get a first understanding of them, and, more importantly, examples and references for digging into the topic. © Massimiliano Zanin et al., 2021;Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2021.

关键词： Semantics

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Why is the Winner the Best?

Why is the Winner the Best?

引用

Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

作者： M. Eisenmann A. Reinke V. Weru M. D. Tizabi F. Isensee T. J. Adler S. Ali V. Andrearczyk M. Aubreville U. Baid S. Bakas N. Balu S. Bano J. Bernal S. Bodenstedt A. Casella V. Cheplygina M. Daum M. De Bruijne A. Depeursinge R. Dorent J. Egger D. G. Ellis S. Engelhardt M. Ganz N. Ghatwary G. Girard P. Godau A. Gupta L. Hansen K. Harada M. Heinrich N. Heller A. Hering A. Huaulmé P. Jannin A. E. Kavur O. Kodym M. Kozubek J. Li H. Li J. Ma C. Martín-Isla B. Menze A. Noble V. Oreiller N. Padoy S. Pati K. Payette T. Rädsch J. Rafael-Patiño V. Singh Bawa S. Speidel C. H. Sudre K. Van Wijnen M. Wagner D. Wei A. Yamlahi M. H. Yap C. Yuan M. Zenk A. Zia D. Zimmerer D. Aydogan B. Bhattarai L. Bloch R. Brüngel J. Cho C. Choi Q. Dou I. Ezhov C. M. Friedrich C. Fuller R. R. Gaire A. Galdran Á. García Faura M. Grammatikopoulou S. Hong M. Jahanifar I. Jang A. Kadkhodamohammadi I. Kang F. Kofler S. Kondo H. Kuijf M. Li M. Luu T. Martinčič P. Morais M. A. Naser B. Oliveira D. Owen S. Pang J. Park S. Park S. Płotka E. Puybareau N. Rajpoot K. Ryu N. Saeed A. Shephard P. Shi D. Štepec R. Subedi G. Tochon H. R. Torres H. Urien J. L. Vilaça K. A. Wahid H. Wang J. Wang L. Wang X. Wang B. Wiestler M. Wodzinski F. Xia J. Xie Z. Xiong S. Yang Y. Yang Z. Zhao K. Maier-Hein P. F. Jäger A. Kopp-Schneider L. Maier-Hein Division of Intelligent Medical Systems German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Helmholtz Imaging German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Division of Biostatistics German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Division of Medical Image Computing German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences School of Computing University of Leeds Leeds UK Institute of Informatics School of Management HES-SO Valais-Wallis University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland Sierre Switzerland Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Lausanne University Hospital Lausanne Switzerland Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt Ingolstadt Germany Center for Artificial Intelligence and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D) and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA) University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Radiology University of Washington Seattle WA USA Department of Computer Science Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS) University College London London UK Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona & Computer Vision Center Barcelona Spain Division of Translational Surgical Oncology National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC) Dresden Dresden Germany Department of Advanced Robotics Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia Italy Department of Electronics Information and Bioengineering Politecnico di Milano Milan Italy IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Department of General Visceral and Transplantation Surgery Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany Department of Radiology and Nuc

International benchmarking competitions have become fundamental for the comparative performance assessment of image analysis methods. However, little attention has been given to investigating what can be learnt from these competitions. Do they really generate scientific progress? What are common and successful participation strategies? What makes a solution superior to a competing method? To address this gap in the literature, we performed a multicenter study with all 80 competitions that were conducted in the scope of IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021. Statistical analyses performed based on comprehensive descriptions of the submitted algorithms linked to their rank as well as the underlying participation strategies revealed common characteristics of winning solutions. These typically include the use of multi-task learning (63%) and/or multi-stage pipelines (61%), and a focus on augmentation (100%), image preprocessing (97%), data curation (79%), and post-processing (66%). The “typical” lead of a winning team is a computer scientist with a doctoral degree, five years of experience in biomedical image analysis, and four years of experience in deep learning. Two core general development strategies stood out for highly-ranked teams: the reflection of the metrics in the method design and the focus on analyzing and handling failure cases. According to the organizers, 43% of the winning algorithms exceeded the state of the art but only 11% completely solved the respective domain problem. The insights of our study could help researchers (1) improve algorithm development strategies when approaching new problems, and (2) focus on open research questions revealed by this work.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

FUTURE-AI: International consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcare

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2023年

作者： Lekadir, Karim Feragen, Aasa Fofanah, Abdul Joseph Frangi, Alejandro F. Buyx, Alena Emelie, Anais Lara, Andrea Porras, Antonio R. Chan, An-Wen Navarro, Arcadi Glocker, Ben Botwe, Benard O. Khanal, Bishesh Beger, Brigit Wu, Carol C. Cintas, Celia Langlotz, Curtis P. Rueckert, Daniel Mzurikwao, Deogratias Fotiadis, Dimitrios I. Zhussupov, Doszhan Ferrante, Enzo Meijering, Erik Weicken, Eva González, Fabio A. Asselbergs, Folkert W. Prior, Fred Krestin, Gabriel P. Collins, Gary S. Tegenaw, Geletaw S. Kaissis, Georgios Misuraca, Gianluca Tsakou, Gianna Dwivedi, Girish Kondylakis, Haridimos Jayakody, Harsha Woodruf, Henry C. Mayer, Horst Joachim Aerts, Hugo JWL Walsh, Ian Chouvarda, Ioanna Buvat, Irène Tributsch, Isabell Rekik, Islem Duncan, James Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree Zahir, Jihad Park, Jinah Mongan, John Gichoya, Judy W. Schnabel, Julia A. Kushibar, Kaisar Riklund, Katrine Mori, Kensaku Marias, Kostas Amugongo, Lameck M. Fromont, Lauren A. Maier-Hein, Lena Alberich, Leonor Cerdá Rittner, Leticia Phiri, Lighton Marrakchi-Kacem, Linda Donoso-Bach, Lluís Martí-Bonmatí, Luis Cardoso, M. Jorge Bobowicz, Maciej Shabani, Mahsa Tsiknakis, Manolis Zuluaga, Maria A. Bielikova, Maria Fritzsche, Marie-Christine Camacho, Marina Linguraru, Marius George Wenzel, Markus De Bruijne, Marleen Tolsgaard, Martin G. Ghassemi, Marzyeh Ashrafuzzaman, Md Goisauf, Melanie Yaqub, Mohammad Abadía, Mónica Cano Mahmoud, Mukhtar M.E. Elattar, Mustafa Rieke, Nicola Papanikolaou, Nikolaos Lazrak, Noussair Díaz, Oliver Salvado, Olivier Pujol, Oriol Sall, Ousmane Guevara, Pamela Gordebeke, Peter Lambin, Philippe Brown, Pieta Abolmaesumi, Purang Dou, Qi Lu, Qinghua Osuala, Richard Nakasi, Rose Zhou, S. Kevin Napel, Sandy Colantonio, Sara Albarqouni, Shadi Joshi, Smriti Carter, Stacy Klein, Stefan Petersen, Steffen E. Aussó, Susanna Awate, Suyash Raviv, Tammy Riklin Cook, Tessa Mutsvangwa, Tinashe E.M. Rogers, Wendy A. Niessen, Wiro J. Puig-Bosch, Xènia Zeng, Yi Mohammed, Yunusa G. Aquino, Yves Saint James Salahuddin, Zohaib Starmans, Martijn P.A. Department de Matemàtiques i Informàtica Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain Barcelona Spain DTU Compute Technical University of Denmark Kgs Lyngby Denmark Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Faculty of Science and Technology Milton Margai Technical University Freetown Sierra Leone Center for Computational Imaging & Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine Schools of Computing and Medicine University of Leeds Leeds United Kingdom Cardiovascular Science and Electronic Engineering Departments KU Leuven Leuven Belgium Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine Technical University of Munich Munich Germany Faculty of Engineering of Systems Informatics and Sciences of Computing Galileo University Guatemala City Guatemala Department of Biostatistics and Informatics Colorado School of Public Health University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus AuroraCO United States Department of Medicine Women’s College Research Institute University of Toronto Toronto Canada Universitat Pompeu Fabra BarcelonaBeta Brain Research Center Barcelona Spain Department of Computing Imperial College London London United Kingdom School of Biomedical & Allied Health Sciences University of Ghana Accra Ghana Department of Midwifery & Radiography School of Health & Psychological Sciences City University of London United Kingdom Kathmandu Nepal European Heart Network Brussels Belgium Department of Thoracic Imaging University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston United States IBM Research Africa Nairobi Kenya Departments of Radiology Medicine and Biomedical Data Science Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford United States Institute for AI and Informatics in Medicine Klinikum rechts der Isar Technical University Munich Munich Germany Department of Computing Imperial College London London United Kingdom Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences Dar es Salaam Tanzania United Republic of Ioannina Greece Almaty AI Lab Almaty Kazakhstan

Background: Despite major advances in artificial intelligence (AI) research for healthcare, the deployment and adoption of AI technologies remain limited in clinical practice. In recent years, concerns have been raised about the clinical, technical, ethical and legal risks associated with healthcare AI. To increase adoption in the real world, it is essential that AI technologies are trusted and accepted by patients, clinicians, health organisations and authorities. This paper describes the FUTURE-AI framework as the first international consensus guideline for trustworthy AI in healthcare. Methods: The FUTURE-AI consortium was founded in 2021 and now comprises 117 interdisciplinary experts from 50 countries representing all continents, including AI scientists, clinical researchers, biomedical ethicists, and social scientists. Over a two-year period, the consortium established guiding principles and best practices for trustworthy and deployable AI through an iterative process comprising an in-depth literature review, a modified Delphi survey, and online consensus meetings. Findings: The FUTURE-AI framework was established based on six guiding principles for trustworthy AI in healthcare, i.e. Fairness, Universality, Traceability, Usability, Robustness and Explainability. Through consensus, a set of 30 best practices were defined, addressing technical, clinical, socio-ethical and legal dimensions of trustworthy AI. The recommendations cover the entire lifecycle of healthcare AI, from design, development and validation to regulation, deployment, and monitoring. Interpretation: FUTURE-AI is a structured, risk-informed framework which provides guidance for constructing healthcare AI tools that will be trusted, deployed and adopted in real-world clinical practice. Researchers are encouraged to take the recommendations into account in proof-of-concept stages to facilitate future translation towards clinical practice of healthcare AI. Copyright © 2023, The Authors. All rights

关键词： Clinical research

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Generating Synthetic Computed Tomography for Radiotherapy: SynthRAD2023 Challenge Report

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2024年

作者： Huijben, Evi M.C. Terpstra, Maarten L. Galapon, Arthur Pai, Suraj Thummerer, Adrian Koopmans, Peter Afonso, Manya van Eijnatten, Maureen Gurney-Champion, Oliver Chen, Zeli Zhang, Yiwen Zheng, Kaiyi Li, Chuanpu Pang, Haowen Ye, Chuyang Wang, Runqi Song, Tao Fan, Fuxin Qiu, Jingna Huang, Yixing Ha, Juhyung Park, Jong Sung Alain-Beaudoin, Alexandra Bériault, Silvain Yu, Pengxin Guo, Hongbin Huang, Zhanyao Li, Gengwan Zhang, Xueru Fan, Yubo Liu, Han Xin, Bowen Nicolson, Aaron Zhong, Lujia Deng, Zhiwei Müller-Franzes, Gustav Khader, Firas Li, Xia Zhang, Ye Hémon, Cédric Boussot, Valentin Zhang, Zhihao Wang, Long Bai, Lu Wang, Shaobin Mus, Derk Kooiman, Bram Sargeant, Chelsea A.H. Henderson, Edward G.A. Kondo, Satoshi Kasai, Satoshi Karimzadeh, Reza Ibragimov, Bulat Helfer, Thomas Dafflon, Jessica Chen, Zijie Wang, Enpei Perko, Zoltan Maspero, Matteo Department of Biomedical Engineering Eindhoven University of Technology Eindhoven Netherlands Radiotherapy Department University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht Netherlands Computational Imaging Group for MR Diagnostics & Therapy University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht Netherlands Department of Radiation Oncology University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen Groningen Netherlands GROW School for Oncology Maastricht University Medical Centre Maastricht Netherlands Department of Radiation Oncology LMU University Hospital LMU Munich Munich Germany Department of Radiation Oncology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen Netherlands Wageningen University & Research Wageningen Plant Research Wageningen Netherlands Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam Amsterdam Netherlands Cancer Center Amsterdam Imaging and Biomarkers Amsterdam Netherlands School of Biomedical Engineering Southern Medical University Guangzhou China School of Integrated Circuits and Electronics Beijing Institute of Technology Beijing China School of Biomedical Engineering ShanghaiTech University Shanghai China Fudan University Shanghai China Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Erlangen Germany Indiana University Bloomington United States Advanced Development Engineering Elekta Ltd Montreal Canada Infervision Medical Technology Co. Ltd. Beijing China Department of Biomedical Engineering Shantou University China Independent researchers Department of Computer Science Vanderbilt University Nashville United States Australian e-Health Research Centre CSIRO HerstonQLD Australia Los AngelesCA United States University Hospital Aachen Aachen Germany Center for Proton Therapy Paul Scherrer Institut Villigen Switzerland Department of Computer Science ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland University Rennes 1 CLCC Eugène Marquis INSERM LTSI Rennes France Subtle Medical Shanghai China MedMind Technology Co.

Radiation therapy plays a crucial role in cancer treatment, necessitating precise delivery of radiation to tumors while sparing healthy tissues over multiple days. Computed tomography (CT) is integral for treatment planning, offering electron density data crucial for accurate dose calculations. However, accurately representing patient anatomy is challenging, especially in adaptive radiotherapy, where CT is not acquired daily. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides superior soft-tissue contrast. Still, it lacks electron density information, while cone beam CT (CBCT) lacks direct electron density calibration and is mainly used for patient positioning. Adopting MRI-only or CBCT-based adaptive radiotherapy eliminates the need for CT planning but presents challenges. Synthetic CT (sCT) generation techniques aim to address these challenges by using image synthesis to bridge the gap between MRI, CBCT, and CT. The SynthRAD2023 challenge was organized to compare synthetic CT generation methods using multi-center ground truth data from 1080 patients, divided into two tasks: 1) MRI-to-CT and 2) CBCT-to-CT. The evaluation included image similarity and dose-based metrics from proton and photon plans. The challenge attracted significant participation, with 617 registrations and 22/17 valid submissions for tasks 1/2. Top-performing teams achieved high structural similarity indices (≥ 0.87/0.90) and gamma pass rates for photon (≥ 98.1%/99.0%) and proton (≥ 97.3%/97.0%) plans. However, no significant correlation was found between image similarity metrics and dose accuracy, emphasizing the need for dose evaluation when assessing the clinical applicability of sCT. SynthRAD2023 facilitated the investigation and benchmarking of sCT generation techniques, providing insights for developing MRI-only and CBCT-based adaptive radiotherapy. It showcased the growing capacity of deep learning to produce high-quality sCT, reducing reliance on conventional CT for treatment planning. © 2024, CC

关键词： Radiotherapy

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Optimal Neural Summarisation for Full-Field Weak Lensing Cosmological Implicit Inference

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2024年

作者： Lanzieri, Denise Zeghal, Justine Makinen, T. Lucas Boucaud, Alexandre Starck, Jean-Luc Lanusse, François Université Paris Cité Université Paris-Saclay CEA CNRS AIM Gif-sur-YvetteF-91191 France Université Paris Cité CNRS Astroparticule et Cosmologie ParisF-75013 France Astrophysics Group Imperial College London Blackett Laboratory Prince Consort Road LondonSW7 2AZ United Kingdom Université Paris-Saclay Université Paris Cité CEA CNRS AIM Gif-sur-Yvette91191 France Sony Computer Science Laboratories - Rome Joint Initiative CREF-SONY Centro Ricerche Enrico Fermi Via Panisperna 89/A Rome00184 Italy Greece Center for Computational Astrophysics Flatiron Institute 162 5th Ave New YorkNY10010 United States Department of Physics Université de Montréal MontréalH2V 0B3 Canada Mila – Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute MontréalH2S 3H1 Canada Ciela – Montreal Institute for Astrophysical Data Analysis and Machine Learning MontréalH2V 0B3 Canada

Context. Traditionally, weak lensing cosmological surveys have been analyzed using summary statistics that were either motivated by their analytically tractable likelihoods (e.g. power spectrum), or by their ability to access some higher-order information (e.g. peak counts) but in that case at the cost of requiring a Simulation-Based Inference approach. In both cases, even if these statistics can be very informative, they are not designed nor guaranteed to be statistically sufficient (i.e. to capture all of the cosmological information content of the data). With the rise of deep learning, however, it becomes possible to create summary statistics that are specifically optimized to extract the full cosmological information content of the data. However, a fairly wide range of loss functions have been used in practice in the weak lensing literature to train such neural networks, leading to the natural question of whether a given loss should be preferred and whether sufficient statistics can be achieved in theory and in practice under these different choices. Aims. We compare different neural summarization strategies that have been proposed in the literature, to answer the question of what loss function leads to theoretically optimal summary statistics for performing full-field cosmological inference. In doing so, we aim to provide guidelines and insights to the community to help guide future neural network-based cosmological inference analyses. Methods. We design an experimental setup which allows us to isolate the specific impact of the loss function used to train neural summary statistics on weak lensing data, at fixed neural architecture and Simulation-Based Inference pipeline. To achieve this, we have developed the sbi_lens JAX package, which implements an automatically differentiable lognormal weak lensing simulator and the tools needed to perform explicit full-field inference with a Hamiltonian-Monte Carlo (HMC) sampler over this model. Using sbi_lens, we simulate

关键词： Cosmology

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

REFUGE Challenge: A unified framework for evaluating automated methods for glaucoma assessment from fundus photographs

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2019年

作者： Orlando, Jose Ignacio Fu, Huazhu Breda, Jo-Ao Barbossa Keer, Karelvan Bathula, Deepti R. Diaz-Pinto, Andres Fang, Ruogu Heng, Pheng-Ann Kim, Jeyoung Lee, JoonHo Lee, Joonseok Li, Xiaoxiao Liu, Peng Lu, Shuai Murugesan, Balamurali Naranjo, Valery Phaye, Sai Samarth R. Shankaranarayana, Sharath M. Sikka, Apoorva Son, Jaemin Hengel, Antonvanden Wang, Shujun Wu, Junyan Wu, Zifeng Xu, Guanghui Xu, Yongli Yin, Pengshuai Li, Fei Zhang, Xiulan Xu, Yanwu Bogunovic, Hrvoje Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry Medical University of Vienna Spitalgasse 23 Vienna1090 Australia Inception Institute of Artificial Intelligence Abu Dhabi United Arab Emirates Surgery and Physiology Department Ophthalmology Unit Faculty of Medicine University of Porto Porto Research Group Ophthalmology KU Leuven Leuven Belgium Ropar Rupnagar140001 India Instituto de Investigacione Innovacion en Bioingeniera Universitat Politecnica de Valencia Valencia46022 Spain J. Crayton Pruitt Family Dept. of Biomedical Engineering University of Florida 32611 United States Department of Computer Science and Engineering Chinese University of Hong Kong 999077 Hong Kong Gachon University Gyeonggi-Do461-701 Korea Republic of Samsung SDS AI Research Center Seoul06765 Korea Republic of Yale University New HavenCT06510 United States Faculty of Science Beijing University of Chemical Technology Beijing100029 China Healthcare Technology Innovation Centre IIT Madras India Department of Electrical Engineering IIT Madras India VUNO Inc Seoul137-810 Korea Republic of Australian Institute for Machine Learning Australia Cleerly Inc New YorkNY10022 United States South China University of Technology Guangzhou510006 China Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou Shi China Articial Intelligence Innovation Business Baidu Inc China and Cixi Institute of Bio Medical Engineering Chinese Academy of Sciences China

Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of irreversible but preventable blindness in working age populations. Color fundus photography (CFP) is the most cost-effective imaging modality to screen for retinal disorders. However, its application to glaucoma has been limited to the computation of a few related biomarkers such as the vertical cup-to-disc ratio. Deep learning approaches, although widely applied for medical image analysis, have not been extensively used for glaucoma assessment due to the limited size of the available data sets. Furthermore, the lack of a standardize benchmark strategy makes dificult to compare existing methods in a uniform way. In order to overcome these issues we set up the Retinal Fundus Glaucoma Challenge, REFUGE (http://***), held in conjunction with MICCAI 2018. The challenge consistedof two primary tasks, namely optic disc/cup segmentation and glaucoma classification. As part of REFUGE, we have publicly released a data set of 1200 fundus images with ground truth segmentations and clinical glaucoma labels, currently the largest existing one. We have also built an evaluation framework to ease and ensure fairness in the comparison of different models, encouraging the development of novel techniques in the field. 12 teams qualified and participated in the online challenge. This paper summarizes their methods and analyzes their corresponding results. In particular, we observed that two of the top-ranked teams outperformed two human experts in the glaucoma classification task. Furthermore, the segmentation results were in general consistent with the ground truth annotations, with complementary outcomes that can be further exploited by ensembling the results. Copyright © 2019, arXiv, All rights reserved.

关键词： Ophthalmology

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Reading race: AI recognizes patient's racial identity in medical images

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2021年

作者： Banerjee, I. Bhimireddy, A.R. Burns, J.L. Celi, L.A. Chen, L. Correa, R. Dullerud, N. Ghassemi, M. Gichoya, J.W. Huang, S. Kuo, P. Lungren, M.P. Price, B.J. Purkayastha, S. Pyrros, A.A. Oakden-Rayner, L. Okechukwu, C. Seyyed-Kalantari, L. Trivedi, H. Wang, R. Zaiman, Z. Zhang, H. Department of Biomedical Informatics Emory University 100 Woodruff Circle AtlantaGA30322 United States School of Informatics and Computing Indiana University Purdue University 535 W Michigan St. IT 475E IndianapolisIN46202 United States Institute for Medical Engineering and Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology 45 Carleton Street E25- 330 CambridgeMA02142 United States Department of Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center 330 Brookline Avenue BostonMA02215 United States Department of Computer Science National Tsing Hua University No. 101 Section 2 Kuang-Fu Road Hsinchu30013 Taiwan Department of Computer Science Emory University 201 Dowman Drive AtlantaGA30322 United States Department of Computer Science University of Toronto 214 College St TorontoONM5T 3A1 Canada Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue CambridgeMA02139 United States Department of Radiology Emory University 1364 Clifton Rd AtlantaGA30322 United States Stanford University School of Medicine 291 Campus Drive Palo AltoCA94305 United States Florida State University College of Medicine 1115 W Call St TallahasseeFL32304 United States Australian Institute for Machine Learning University of Adelaide AIML Building Lot Fourteen Cnr North Terrace and Frome Road AdelaideSA5000 Australia Department of Computer Science Georgia Institute of Technology 266 Ferst Drive AtlantaGA30332 United States Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute Sinai Health 600 University Ave TorontoONM5G 1X5 Canada Dupage Medical Group 40 S Clay St HinsdaleIL60521 United States

Background: In medical imaging, prior studies have demonstrated disparate AI performance by race, yet there is no known correlation for race on medical imaging that would be obvious to the human expert interpreting the images. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation of AI's ability to recognize patient's racial identity from medical images. Methods: Using private and public datasets we evaluate: A) performance quantification of deep learning models to detect race from medical images, including the ability of these models to generalize to external environments and across multiple imaging modalities, B) assessment of possible confounding anatomic and phenotype population features, such as disease distribution and body habitus as predictors of race, and C) investigation into the underlying mechanism by which AI models can recognize race. Findings: Standard deep learning models can be trained to predict race from medical images with high performance across multiple imaging modalities. Our findings hold under external validation conditions, as well as when models are optimized to perform clinically motivated tasks. We demonstrate this detection is not due to trivial proxies or imaging-related surrogate covariates for race, such as underlying disease distribution. Finally, we show that performance persists over all anatomical regions and frequency spectrum of the images suggesting that mitigation efforts will be challenging and demand further study. Interpretation: We emphasize that model ability to predict self-reported race is itself not the issue of importance. However, our findings that AI can trivially predict self-reported race - even from corrupted, cropped, and noised medical images - in a setting where clinical experts cannot, creates an enormous risk for all model deployments in medical imaging: if an AI model secretly used its knowledge of self-reported race to misclassify all Black patients, radiologists would not be able to tell using the same data the model ha

关键词： Medical imaging

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

DOME Registry: Implementing community-wide recommendations for reporting supervised machine learning in biology

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2024年

作者： Attafi, Omar Abdelghani Clementel, Damiano Kyritsis, Konstantinos Capriotti, Emidio Farrell, Gavin Fragkouli, Styliani-Christina Castro, Leyla Jael Hatos, András Lenaerts, Tom Mazurenko, Stanislav Mozaffari, Soroush Pradelli, Franco Ruch, Patrick Savojardo, Castrense Turina, Paola Zambelli, Federico Piovesan, Damiano Monzon, Alexander Miguel Psomopoulos, Fotis Tosatto, Silvio C.E. Department of Biomedical Sciences University of Padova Italy Institute of Applied Biosciences Centre for Research and Technology Hellas Thessaloniki Greece Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology University of Bologna Bologna Italy ELIXIR Hub Hinxton Cambridge United Kingdom Department of Biology National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece ZB Med Information Centre for Life Sciences Cologne Germany Department of Oncology Geneva University Hospitals Geneva Switzerland Department of Computational Biology University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics Lausanne Switzerland Swiss Cancer Center Léman Lausanne Switzerland Interuniversity Institute of Bioinformatics in Brussels Université Libre de Bruxelles Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussels1050 Belgium Machine Learning Group Université Libre de Bruxelles Street Belgium Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Vrije Universiteit Brussels Brussels Belgium Loschmidt Laboratories Department of Experimental Biology and RECETOX Faculty of Science Czech Republic Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic International Clinical Research Centre St. Anne's Hospital Brno Czech Republic HES-SO - HEG Geneva Geneva Switzerland SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics Geneva Switzerland Dept. of Biosciences University of Milan Italy Bari Italy Department of Information Engineering University of Padova Italy Bari Italy

Supervised machine learning (ML) is used extensively in biology and deserves closer scrutiny. The DOME recommendations aim to enhance the validation and reproducibility of ML research by establishing standards for key aspects such as data handling and processing, optimization, evaluation, and model interpretability. The recommendations help to ensure that key details are reported transparently by providing a structured set of questions. Here, we introduce the DOME Registry, a database that allows scientists to manage and access comprehensive DOME-related information on published ML studies. The registry uses external resources like ORCID, APICURON and the data Stewardship Wizard to streamline the annotation process and ensure comprehensive documentation. By assigning unique identifiers and DOME scores to publications, the registry fosters a standardized evaluation of ML methods. Future plans include continuing to grow the registry through community curation, improving the DOME score definition and encouraging publishers to adopt DOME standards, promoting transparency and reproducibility of ML in the life sciences. The DOME Registry can be freely accessed from URL: ***. © 2024, CC BY-NC-ND.

关键词： Domes

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Why is the winner the best?

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2023年

作者： Eisenmann, M. Reinke, A. Weru, V. Tizabi, M.D. Isensee, F. Adler, T.J. Ali, S. Andrearczyk, V. Aubreville, M. Baid, U. Bakas, S. Balu, N. Bano, S. Bernal, J. Bodenstedt, S. Casella, A. Cheplygina, V. Daum, M. de Bruijne, M. Depeursinge, A. Dorent, R. Egger, J. Ellis, D.G. Engelhardt, S. Ganz, M. Ghatwary, N. Girard, G. Godau, P. Gupta, A. Hansen, L. Harada, K. Heinrich, M. Heller, N. Hering, A. Huaulmé, A. Jannin, P. Kavur, A.E. Kodym, O. Kozubek, M. Li, J. Li, H. Ma, J. Martín-Isla, C. Menze, B. Noble, A. Oreiller, V. Padoy, N. Pati, S. Payette, K. Rädsch, T. Rafael-Patiño, J. Bawa, V. Singh Speidel, S. Sudre, C.H. van Wijnen, K. Wagner, M. Wei, D. Yamlahi, A. Yap, M.H. Yuan, C. Zenk, M. Zia, A. Zimmerer, D. Aydogan, D. Bhattarai, B. Bloch, L. Brüngel, R. Cho, J. Choi, C. Dou, Q. Ezhov, I. Friedrich, C.M. Fuller, C. Gaire, R.R. Galdran, A. Faura, Á. García Grammatikopoulou, M. Hong, S. Jahanifar, M. Jang, I. Kadkhodamohammadi, A. Kang, I. Kofler, F. Kondo, S. Kuijf, H. Li, M. Luu, M. Martinčič, T. Morais, P. Naser, M.A. Oliveira, B. Owen, D. Pang, S. Park, J. Park, S. Plotka, S. Puybareau, E. Rajpoot, N. Ryu, K. Saeed, N. Shephard, A. Shi, P. Štepec, D. Subedi, R. Tochon, G. Torres, H.R. Urien, H. Vilaça, J.L. Wahid, K.A. Wang, H. Wang, J. Wang, L. Wang, X. Wiestler, B. Wodzinski, M. Xia, F. Xie, J. Xiong, Z. Yang, S. Yang, Y. Zhao, Z. Maier-Hein, K. Jäger, P.F. Kopp-Schneider, A. Maier-Hein, L. Heidelberg Germany Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Heidelberg Germany Heidelberg Germany School of Computing Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences University of Leeds Leeds United Kingdom Institute of Informatics School of Management HES-SO Valais-Wallis University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland Sierre Switzerland Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Lausanne University Hospital Lausanne Switzerland Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt Ingolstadt Germany University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology University of Washington SeattleWA United States Department of Computer Science University College London London United Kingdom Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona & Computer Vision Center Barcelona Spain Dresden Dresden Germany Department of Advanced Robotics Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia Italy IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Department of General Visceral and Transplantation Surgery Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Erasmus MC Rotterdam Netherlands Department of Computer Science University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Sierre Switzerland Harvard Medical School Brigham and Women’s Hospital BostonMA United States School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences King’s College London London United Kingdom Essen Germany University of Nebraska Medical Center OmahaNE United States Department of Internal Medicine III Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany Neurobiology Research Unit Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet C

International benchmarking competitions have become fundamental for the comparative performance assessment of image analysis methods. However, little attention has been given to investigating what can be learnt from these competitions. Do they really generate scientific progress? What are common and successful participation strategies? What makes a solution superior to a competing method? To address this gap in the literature, we performed a multicenter study with all 80 competitions that were conducted in the scope of IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021. Statistical analyses performed based on comprehensive descriptions of the submitted algorithms linked to their rank as well as the underlying participation strategies revealed common characteristics of winning solutions. These typically include the use of multi-task learning (63%) and/or multi-stage pipelines (61%), and a focus on augmentation (100%), image preprocessing (97%), data curation (79%), and postprocessing (66%). The "typical" lead of a winning team is a computer scientist with a doctoral degree, five years of experience in biomedical image analysis, and four years of experience in deep learning. Two core general development strategies stood out for highly-ranked teams: the reflection of the metrics in the method design and the focus on analyzing and handling failure cases. According to the organizers, 43% of the winning algorithms exceeded the state of the art but only 11% completely solved the respective domain problem. The insights of our study could help researchers (1) improve algorithm development strategies when approaching new problems, and (2) focus on open research questions revealed by this work. © 2023, CC BY.

关键词： Benchmarking

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

The state-of-the-art in Cardiac MRI Reconstruction: Results of the CMRxRecon Challenge in MICCAI 2023

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2024年

作者： Lyu, Jun Qin, Chen Wang, Shuo Wang, Fanwen Li, Yan Wang, Zi Guo, Kunyuan Ouyang, Cheng Tänzer, Michael Liu, Meng Sun, Longyu Sun, Mengting Li, Qin Shi, Zhang Hua, Sha Li, Hao Chen, Zhensen Zhang, Zhenlin Xin, Bingyu Metaxas, Dimitris N. Yiasemis, George Teuwen, Jonas Zhang, Liping Chen, Weitian Pang, Yanwei Liu, Xiaohan Razumov, Artem Dylov, Dmitry V. Dou, Quan Yan, Kang Xue, Yuyang Du, Yuning Dietlmeier, Julia Garcia-Cabrera, Carles Hemidi, Ziad Al-Haj Vogt, Nora Xu, Ziqiang Zhang, Yajing Chu, Ying-Hua Chen, Weibo Bai, Wenjia Zhuang, Xiahai Qin, Jing Wu, Lianmin Yang, Guang Qu, Xiaobo Wang, He Wang, Chengyan Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory Brigham and Women’s Hospital Harvard Medical School 399 Revolution Drive BostonMA02215 United States Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering & I-X Imperial College London United Kingdom Digital Medical Research Center School of Basic Medical Sciences Fudan University Shanghai China Department of Bioengineering & I-X Imperial College London LondonW12 7SL United Kingdom Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit Royal Brompton Hospital Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust LondonSW3 6NP United Kingdom Department of Radiology Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China Department of Electronic Science Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plasma and Magnetic Resonance National Institute for Data Science in Health and Medicine Institute of Artificial Intelligence Xiamen University Xiamen361102 China Department of Computing Department of Brain Sciences Imperial College London LondonSW7 2AZ United Kingdom Human Phenome Institute Fudan University 825 Zhangheng Road Pudong New District Shanghai201203 China Department of Radiology Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University Shanghai China Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Ruijin Hospital Lu Wan Branch Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence Fudan University Shanghai200433 China Department of Computer Science Rutgers University PiscatawayNJ08854 United States AI for Oncology Netherlands Cancer Institute Plesmanlaan 121 Amsterdam1066 CX Netherlands Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong TJK-BIIT Lab School of Electrical and Information Engineering Tianjin University Tianjin300072 China Skolkovo Institute Of Science And Technology Center for Artificial Intelligence Technology 30/1 Bolshoy blvd. Moscow121205 Russia Department of Biomedical Engineering University of Virginia

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides detailed and quantitative evaluation of the heart’s structure, function, and tissue characteristics with high-resolution spatial-temporal imaging. However, its slow imaging speed and motion artifacts are notable limitations. Undersampling reconstruction, especially data-driven algorithms, has emerged as a promising solution to accelerate scans and enhance imaging performance using highly under-sampled data. Nevertheless, the scarcity of publicly available cardiac k-space datasets and evaluation platform hinder the development of data-driven reconstruction algorithms. To address this issue, we organized the Cardiac MRI Reconstruction Challenge (CMRxRecon) in 2023, in collaboration with the 26th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI). CMRxRecon presented an extensive k-space dataset comprising cine and mapping raw data, accompanied by detailed annotations of cardiac anatomical structures. With overwhelming participation, the challenge attracted more than 285 teams and over 600 participants. Among them, 22 teams successfully submitted Docker containers for the testing phase, with 7 teams submitted for both cine and mapping tasks. All teams use deep learning based approaches, indicating that deep learning has predominately become a promising solution for the problem. The first-place winner of both tasks utilizes the E2E-VarNet architecture as backbones. In contrast, U-Net is still the most popular backbone for both multi-coil and single-coil reconstructions. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the challenge design, presents a summary of the submitted results, reviews the employed methods, and offers an in-depth discussion that aims to inspire future advancements in cardiac MRI reconstruction models. The summary emphasizes the effective strategies observed in Cardiac MRI reconstruction, including backbone architecture, loss function, pre-processing techn

关键词： Mapping

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：