检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

QU-BraTS: MICCAI BraTS 2020 Challenge on Quantifying Uncertainty in Brain Tumor Segmentation - Analysis of Ranking Scores and Benchmarking Results

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2021年

作者： Mehta, Raghav Filos, Angelos Baid, Ujjwal Sako, Chiharu McKinley, Richard Rebsamen, Michael Dätwyler, Katrin Meier, Raphael Radojewski, Piotr Murugesan, Gowtham Krishnan Nalawade, Sahil Ganesh, Chandan Wagner, Ben Yu, Fang F. Fei, Baowei Madhuranthakam, Ananth J. Maldjian, Joseph A. Daza, Laura Gómez, Catalina Arbeláez, Pablo Dai, Chengliang Wang, Shuo Reynaud, Hadrien Mo, Yuanhan Angelini, Elsa Guo, Yike Bai, Wenjia Banerjee, Subhashis Pei, Linmin Murat, A.K. Rosas-González, Sarahi Zemmoura, Ilyess Tauber, Clovis Vu, Minh H. Nyholm, Tufve Löfstedt, Tommy Ballestar, Laura Mora Vilaplana, Veronica McHugh, Hugh Talou, Gonzalo Maso Wang, Alan Patel, Jay Chang, Ken Hoebel, Katharina Gidwani, Mishka Arun, Nishanth Gupta, Sharut Aggarwal, Mehak Singh, Praveer Gerstner, Elizabeth R. Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree Boutry, Nicolas Huard, Alexis Vidyaratne, Lasitha Rahman, Md Monibor Iftekharuddin, Khan M. Chazalon, Joseph Puybareau, Elodie Tochon, Guillaume Ma, Jun Cabezas, Mariano Llado, Xavier Oliver, Arnau Valencia, Liliana Valverde, Sergi Amian, Mehdi Soltaninejad, Mohammadreza Myronenko, Andriy Hatamizadeh, Ali Feng, Xue Dou, Quan Tustison, Nicholas Meyer, Craig Shah, Nisarg A. Talbar, Sanjay Weber, Marc-André Mahajan, Abhishek Jakab, Andras Wiest, Roland Fathallah-Shaykh, Hassan M. Nazeri, Arash Milchenko, Mikhail Marcus, Daniel Kotrotsou, Aikaterini Colen, Rivka Freymann, John Kirby, Justin Davatzikos, Christos Menze, Bjoern Bakas, Spyridon Gal, Yarin Arbel, Tal McGill University MontrealQC Canada Group University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine The University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology University of Bern Inselspital Bern University Hospital Bern Switzerland Department of Radiology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center DallasTX United States Department of Bioengineering University of Texas DallasTX United States Advanced Imaging Research Center University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center DallasTX United States Universidad de los Andes Bogotá Colombia Data Science Institute Imperial College London London United Kingdom NIHR Imperial BRC ITMAT Data Science Group Imperial College London London United Kingdom Department of Brain Sciences Imperial College London London United Kingdom Machine Intelligence Unit Indian Statistical Institute Kolkata India Department of CSE University of Calcutta Kolkata India Department of Information Technology Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden Department of Diagnostic Radiology The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center PittsburghPA United States UMR U1253 iBrain Université de Tours Inserm Tours France Department of Radiation Sciences Umeå University Umeå Sweden Department of Computing Science Umeå University Umeå Sweden Signal Theory and Communications Department Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Barcelona Tech Barcelona Spain Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand Radiology Department Auckland City Hospital Auckland New Zealand Auckland Bioengineering Institute University of Auckland New Zealand Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging Department of Radiology

Deep learning (DL) models have provided state-of-the-art performance in various medical imaging benchmarking challenges, including the Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenges. However, the task of focal pathology multi-compartment segmentation (e.g., tumor and lesion sub-regions) is particularly challenging, and potential errors hinder translating DL models into clinical workflows. Quantifying the reliability of DL model predictions in the form of uncertainties could enable clinical review of the most uncertain regions, thereby building trust and paving the way toward clinical translation. Several uncertainty estimation methods have recently been introduced for DL medical image segmentation tasks. Developing scores to evaluate and compare the performance of uncertainty measures will assist the end-user in making more informed decisions. In this study, we explore and evaluate a score developed during the BraTS 2019 and BraTS 2020 task on uncertainty quantification (QU-BraTS) and designed to assess and rank uncertainty estimates for brain tumor multi-compartment segmentation. This score (1) rewards uncertainty estimates that produce high confidence in correct assertions and those that assign low confidence levels at incorrect assertions, and (2) penalizes uncertainty measures that lead to a higher percentage of under-confident correct assertions. We further benchmark the segmentation uncertainties generated by 14 independent participating teams of QU-BraTS 2020, all of which also participated in the main BraTS segmentation task. Overall, our findings confirm the importance and complementary value that uncertainty estimates provide to segmentation algorithms, highlighting the need for uncertainty quantification in medical image analyses. Finally, in favor of transparency and reproducibility, our evaluation code is made publicly available at https://***/RagMeh11/QU-BraTS. © 2021, CC BY.

关键词： Benchmarking

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Reply to chen et al.: Parametric methods for cluster inference perform worse for two-sided t-tests

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2018年

作者： Eklund, Anders Knutsson, Hans Nichols, Thomas E. Department of Biomedical Engineering Division of Medical Informatics Linkoping University Linkoping Sweden Department of Computer and Information Science Division of Statistics and Machine Learning Linkoping University Linkoping Sweden Linkoping University Linkoping Sweden Big Data Institute University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom United Kingdom University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom Department of Statistics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom

One-sided t-tests are commonly used in the neuroimaging field, but two-sided tests should be the default unless a researcher has a strong reason for using a one-sided test. Here we extend our previous work on cluster false positive rates, which used one-sided tests, to two-sided tests. Briey, we found that parametric methods perform worse for two-sided t-tests, and that non-parametric methods perform equally well for one-sided and two-sided tests. Copyright © 2018, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Neuroimaging

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

The Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS-METS) Challenge 2023: Brain Metastasis Segmentation on Pre-treatment MRI

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2023年

作者： Moawad, Ahmed W. Janas, Anastasia Baid, Ujjwal Ramakrishnan, Divya Saluja, Rachit Ashraf, Nader Jekel, Leon Amiruddin, Raisa Adewole, Maruf Albrecht, Jake Anazodo, Udunna Aneja, Sanjay Anwar, Syed Muhammad Bergquist, Timothy Calabrese, Evan Chiang, Veronica Chung, Verena Conte, Gian Marco Marco Dako, Farouk Eddy, James Ezhov, Ivan Familiar, Ariana Farahani, Keyvan Iglesias, Juan Eugenio Jiang, Zhifan Johanson, Elaine Kazerooni, Anahita Fathi Kofler, Florian Krantchev, Kiril LaBella, Dominic Van Leemput, Koen Li, Hongwei Bran Linguraru, Marius George Link, Katherine E. Liu, Xinyang Maleki, Nazanin Meier, Zeke Menze, Bjoern H. Moy, Harrison Osenberg, Klara Piraud, Marie Reitman, Zachary Shinohara, Russel Takeshi Tahon, Nourel hoda Nada, Ayman Velichko, Yuri S. Wang, Chunhao Wiestler, Benedikt Wiggins, Walter Shafique, Umber Willms, Klara Avesta, Arman Bousabarah, Khaled Chakrabarty, Satrajit Gennaro, Nicolo Holler, Wolfgang Kaur, Manpreet LaMontagne, Pamela Lin, MingDe Lost, Jan Marcus, Daniel S. Maresca, Ryan Merkaj, Sarah Nada, Ayaman Pedersen, Gabriel Cassinelli von Reppert, Marc Sotiras, Aristeidis Teytelboym, Oleg Tillmans, Niklas Westerhoff, Malte Youssef, Ayda Godfrey, Devon Floyd, Scott Rauschecker, Andreas Villanueva-Meyer, Javier Pflüger, Irada Cho, Jaeyoung Bendszus, Martin Brugnara, Gianluca Cramer, Justin Perez-Carillo, Gloria Guzman J. Johnson, Derek R. Kam, Anthony Kwan, Benjamin Yin Ming Lai, Lillian Lall, Neil U. Memon, Fatima Patro, Satya Narayana Petrovic, Bojan So, Tiffany Y. Thompson, Gerard Wu, Lei Schrickel, E. Brooke Bansal, Anu Barkhof, Frederik Besada, Cristina Chu, Sammy Druzgal, Jason Dusoi, Alexandru Farage, Luciano Feltrin, Fabricio Fong, Amy Fung, Steve H. Gray, R. Ian Ikuta, Ichiro Iv, Michael Postma, Alida A. Mahajan, Amit Joyner, David Krumpelman, Chase Letourneau-Guillon, Laurent Lincoln, Christie M. Maros, Mate E. Miller, Elka Morón, Fanny Nimchinsky, Esther A. Ozsarlak, Ozkan Patel, Uresh Rohatgi, Saurabh Saha, Atin Sayah, Anousheh Schwartz, Eric D. Shih, Robert Shiroishi, Mark Trinity health Mid Atlantic Hosiptals DarbyPA United States Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging Yale School of Medicine New HavenCT United States Division of Computational Pathology Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine School of Medicine Indiana University IndianapolisIN United States Department of Electical and Computer Engineering Cornell University Cornell Tech New YorkNY United States Department of Radiology Weill Cornell Medicine New YorkNY United States ImagineQuant Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia PhiladelphiaPA United States College of Medicine Alfaisal University Riyadh Saudi Arabia DKFZ Division of Translational Neurooncology The WTZ German Cancer Consortium DKTK Partner Site University Hospital Essen Essen Germany Medical Artificial Intelligence Lab Crestview Radiology Lagos Nigeria Sage Bionetworks SeattleWA United States Montreal Neurological Institute McGill University Montreal Canada lab Crestview Radiology Lagos Nigeria Department of Therapeutic Radiology Yale School of Medicine New HavenCT United States Sheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation Children’s National Hospital WashingtonDC United States Department of Radiology Mayo Clinic RochesterMN United States Department of Radiology Duke University Medical Center DurhamNC United States Department of Neurosurgery Yale School of Medicine New HavenCT United States Center for Global Health Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PA United States Department of Informatics Technical University Munich Germany Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Cancer Imaging Program National Cancer Institute National Institutes of Health BethesdaMD United States Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging Massachusetts General Hospital BostonMA United States Children’s National Hospital WashingtonDC United States PrecisionFDA U.S. Food and Drug Administration S

The translation of AI-generated brain metastases (BM) segmentation into clinical practice relies heavily on diverse, high-quality annotated medical imaging datasets. The BraTS-METS 2023 challenge has gained momentum for testing and benchmarking algorithms using rigorously annotated internationally compiled real-world datasets. This study presents the results of the segmentation challenge and characterizes the challenging cases that impacted the performance of the winning algorithms. Untreated brain metastases on standard anatomic MRI sequences (T1, T2, FLAIR, T1PG) from eight contributed international datasets were annotated in stepwise method: published UNET algorithms, student, neuroradiologist, final approver neuroradiologist. Segmentations were ranked based on lesion-wise Dice and Hausdorff distance (HD95) scores. False positives (FP) and false negatives (FN) were rigorously penalized, receiving a score of 0 for Dice and a fixed penalty of 374 for HD95. The mean scores for the teams were calculated. Eight datasets comprising 1303 studies were annotated, with 402 studies (3076 lesions) released on Synapse as publicly available datasets to challenge competitors. Additionally, 31 studies (139 lesions) were held out for validation, and 59 studies (218 lesions) were used for testing. Segmentation accuracy was measured as rank across subjects, with the winning team achieving a LesionWise mean score of 7.9. The Dice score for the winning team was 0.65 ± 0.25. Common errors among the leading teams included false negatives for small lesions and misregistration of masks in space. The Dice scores and lesion detection rates of all algorithms diminished with decreasing tumor size, particularly for tumors smaller than 100 mm3. In conclusion, algorithms for BM segmentation require further refinement to balance high sensitivity in lesion detection with the minimization of false positives and negatives. The BraTS-METS 2023 challenge successfully curated well-annotated, diverse d

关键词： Image segmentation

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Cluster failure revisited: Impact of first level design and data quality on cluster false positive rates

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2018年

作者： Eklund, Anders Knutsson, Hans Nichols, Thomas E. Division of Medical Informatics Department of Biomedical Engineering Linköping University Linköping Sweden Division of Statistics & Machine Learning Department of Computer and Information Science Linköping University Linköping Sweden Linköping University Linköping Sweden Big Data Institute University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom Department of Statistics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom

Methodological research rarely generates a broad interest, yet our work on the validity of cluster inference methods for functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) created intense discussion on both the minutia of our approach and its implications for the discipline. In the present work, we take on various critiques of our work and further explore the limitations of our original work. We address issues about the particular event-related designs we used, considering multiple event types and randomisation of events between subjects. We consider the lack of validity found with one-sample permutation (sign flipping) tests, investigating a number of approaches to improve the false positive control of this widely used procedure. We found that the combination of a two-sided test and cleaning the data using ICA FIX resulted in nominal false positive rates for all datasets, meaning that data cleaning is not only important for resting state fMRI, but also for task fMRI. Finally, we discuss the implications of our work on the fMRI literature as a whole, estimating that at least 10% of the fMRI studies have used the most problematic cluster inference method (P = 0.01 cluster defining threshold), and how individual studies can be interpreted in light of our findings. These additional results underscore our original conclusions, on the importance of data sharing and thorough evaluation of statistical methods on realistic null data. Copyright © 2018, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Magnetic resonance imaging

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Correction to: Development and clinical validation of inertial sensor-based gait-clustering methods in Parkinson's disease

引用

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation 2019年第1期16卷 98页

作者： An Nguyen Nils Roth Nooshin Haji Ghassemi Julius Hannink Thomas Seel Jochen Klucken Heiko Gassner Bjoern M Eskofier Machine Learning and Data Analytics Lab Department of Computer Science Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) Carl-Thiersch-Straße 2b 91052 Erlangen Germany. an.nguyen@fau.de. Machine Learning and Data Analytics Lab Department of Computer Science Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) Carl-Thiersch-Straße 2b 91052 Erlangen Germany. Control Systems Group Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Technische Universität Berlin (TUB) Einsteinufer 17 10587 Berlin Germany. Department of Molecular Neurology University Hospital Erlangen Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) Schwabachanlage 6 91054 Erlangen Germany.

The original article [1] contained an error whereby Fig. 6 contained a minor shading glitch affecting its presentation. This has now been corrected.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Scholarly Influence of the Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum eHealth Initiative: Review and Bibliometric Study of the 2012 to 2017 Outcomes

引用

JMIR Research Protocols 2018年第7期7卷 e10961页

作者： Suominen, Hanna Kelly, Liadh Goeuriot, Lorraine Research School of Computer Science College of Engineering and Computer Science The Australian National University Canberra ACT Australia Machine Learning Research Group Data61 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Canberra ACT Australia Faculty of Science and Technology University of Canberra Canberra ACT Australia Department of Future Technologies Faculty of Science and Engineering University of Turku Turku Finland Department of Computer Science Maynooth University Maynooth Co Kildare Ireland Grenoble Informatics Laboratory Université Grenoble Alpes Grenoble France

Background: The eHealth initiative of the Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum (CLEF) has aimed since 2012 to provide researchers working on health text analytics with annual workshops, shared development challenges and tasks, benchmark datasets, and software for processing and evaluation. In 2012, it ran as a scientific workshop with the aim of establishing an evaluation lab, and since 2013, this annual workshop has been supplemented with 3 or more preceding labs each year. An evaluation lab is an activity where the participating individuals or teams’ goal is to solve the same problem, typically using the same dataset in a given time frame. The overall purpose of this initiative is to support patients, their next of kin, clinical staff, health scientists, and health care policy makers in accessing, understanding, using, and authoring health information in a multilingual setting. In the CLEF eHealth 2013 to 2017 installations, the aim was to address patient-centric text processing. From 2015, the scope was also extended to aid both patients’ understanding and clinicians’ authoring of various types of medical content. CLEF eHealth 2017 introduced a new pilot task on technology-assisted reviews (TARs) in empirical medicine in order to support health scientists and health care policymakers’ information access. Objectives: This original research paper reports on the outcomes of the first 6 installations of CLEF eHealth from 2012 to 2017. The focus is on measuring and analyzing the scholarly influence by reviewing CLEF eHealth papers and their citations. Methods: A review and bibliometric study of the CLEF eHealth proceedings, working notes, and author-declared paper extensions were conducted. Citation content analysis was used for the publications and their citations collected from Google Scholar. Results: As many as 718 teams registered their interest in the tasks, leading to 130 teams submitting to the 15 tasks. A total of 184 papers using CLEF eHealth data gen

关键词： Evaluation studies as topic Health records Information extraction Information storage and retrieval Information visualization Patient education as topic Speech recognition Systematic reviews Test-set generation Text classification

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Correction for Rando et al., "Pathogenesis, Symptomatology, and Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 through Analysis of Viral Genomics and Structure"

引用

mSystems 2022年第1期7卷 e0144721页

作者： Halie M Rando Adam L MacLean Alexandra J Lee Ronan Lordan Sandipan Ray Vikas Bansal Ashwin N Skelly Elizabeth Sell John J Dziak Lamonica Shinholster Lucy D'Agostino McGowan Marouen Ben Guebila Nils Wellhausen Sergey Knyazev Simina M Boca Stephen Capone Yanjun Qi YoSon Park David Mai Yuchen Sun Joel D Boerckel Christian Brueffer James Brian Byrd Jeremy P Kamil Jinhui Wang Ryan Velazquez Gregory L Szeto John P Barton Rishi Raj Goel Serghei Mangul Tiago Lubiana Anthony Gitter Casey S Greene Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora Colorado USA. Center for Health AI University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora Colorado USA. Department of Quantitative and Computational Biology University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA. Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA. Department of Biotechnology Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad Sangareddy Telangana India. Biomedical Data Science and Machine Learning Group German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases Tübingen Germany. Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA. Institute for Immunology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA. Edna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center The Pennsylvania State University University Park Pennsylvania USA. Mercer University Macon Georgia USA. Department of Mathematics and Statistics Wake Forest University Winston-Salem North Carolina USA. Department of Biostatistics Harvard School of Public Health Boston Massachusetts USA. Georgia State University Atlanta Georgia USA. Innovation Center for Biomedical Informatics Georgetown University Medical Center Washington DC USA. St. George's University School of Medicine St. George's Grenada. Department of Computer Science University of Virginiagrid.27755.32 Charlottesville Virginia USA. Department of Bioengineering University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA. Department of Clinical Sciences Lund University Lund Sweden. University of Michigan School of Medicine Ann Arbor Michigan USA. Depar

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021

引用

The Lancet 2023年第10397期402卷 203-234页

作者： Ong, Kanyin Liane Stafford, Lauryn K. McLaughlin, Susan A. Boyko, Edward J. Vollset, Stein Emil Smith, Amanda E. Dalton, Bronte E. Duprey, Joe Cruz, Jessica A. Hagins, Hailey Lindstedt, Paulina A. Aali, Amirali Abate, Yohannes Habtegiorgis Abate, Melsew Dagne Abbasian, Mohammadreza Abbasi-Kangevari, Zeinab Abbasi-Kangevari, Mohsen ElHafeez, Samar Abd Abd-Rabu, Rami Abdulah, Deldar Morad Abdullah, Abu Yousuf Md Abedi, Vida Abidi, Hassan Aboagye, Richard Gyan Abolhassani, Hassan Abu-Gharbieh, Eman Abu-Zaid, Ahmed Adane, Tigist Demssew Adane, Denberu Eshetie Addo, Isaac Yeboah Adegboye, Oyelola A. Adekanmbi, Victor Adepoju, Abiola Victor Adnani, Qorinah Estiningtyas Sakilah Afolabi, Rotimi Felix Agarwal, Gina Aghdam, Zahra Babaei Agudelo-Botero, Marcela Arriagada, Constanza Elizabeth Aguilera Agyemang-Duah, Williams Ahinkorah, Bright Opoku Ahmad, Danish Ahmad, Rizwan Ahmad, Sajjad Ahmad, Aqeel Ahmadi, Ali Ahmadi, Keivan Ahmed, Ali Ahmed, Luai A. Ahmed, Syed Anees Ajami, Marjan Akinyemi, Rufus Olusola Al Hamad, Hanadi Al Hasan, Syed Mahfuz AL-Ahdal, Tareq Mohammed Ali Alalwan, Tariq A. Al-Aly, Ziyad AlBataineh, Mohammad T. Alcalde-Rabanal, Jacqueline Elizabeth Alemi, Sharifullah Ali, Hassam Alinia, Tahereh Aljunid, Syed Mohamed Almustanyir, Sami Al-Raddadi, Rajaa M. Alvis-Guzman, Nelson Amare, Firehiwot Ameyaw, Edward Kwabena Amiri, Sohrab Amusa, Ganiyu Adeniyi Andrei, Catalina Liliana Anjana, Ranjit Mohan Ansar, Adnan Ansari, Golnoosh Ansari-Moghaddam, Alireza Anyasodor, Anayochukwu Edward Arabloo, Jalal Aravkin, Aleksandr Y. Areda, Demelash Arifin, Hidayat Arkew, Mesay Armocida, Benedetta Arnlov, Johan Artamonov, Anton A. Arulappan, Judie Aruleba, Raphael Taiwo Arumugam, Ashokan Aryan, Zahra Asemu, Mulu Tiruneh Asghari-Jafarabadi, Mohammad Askari, Elaheh Asmelash, Daniel Astell-Burt, Thomas Athar, Mohammad Athari, Seyyed Shamsadin Atout, Maha Moh'd Wahbi Avila-Burgos, Leticia Awaisu, Ahmed Azadnajafabad, Sina Darshan, B.B. Babamohamadi, Hassan Badar, Muhammad Badawi, Alaa Badiye, Ashish D. Baghcheghi, Nayereh Baghe Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation School of Medicine General Medicine Service Department of Veterans Affairs Seattle WA United States Department of Health Metrics Sciences School of Medicine Faculty of Medicine France Department of Clinical Governance and Quality Improvement Aleta Wondo Hospital Aleta Wondo Ethiopia Department of Nursing Woldia University Woldia Ethiopia Department of Nursing Department of Orthopedic Surgery Orthopaedic Surgery Social Determinants of Health Research Center Non-communicable Diseases Research Center Epidemiology Department Evidence-Based Practice Center Community and Maternity Nursing Unit University of Duhok Duhok Iraq School of Planning Faculty of Environment Department of Public Health Sciences Penn State College of Medicine Pennsylvania State University Hershey PA United States Biocomplexity Institute Virginia Tech Blacksburg VA United States College of Medicine Department of Public Health Laboratory Technology Sciences Department Department of Family and Community Health University of Health and Allied Sciences Ho Ghana Research Center for Immunodeficiencies Department of Biosciences and Nutrition Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge Sweden Clinical Sciences Department Department of Surgery Department of Surgery Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology College of Graduate Health Sciences University of Tennessee Memphis TN United States Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Department of Clinical and Psychosocial Epidemiology Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Centre for Social Research in Health Quality and Systems Performance Unit Cancer Institute NSW Sydney NSW Australia Department of Public Health and Tropical Medicine HIV and Infectious Diseases Department Jhpiego Abuja Nigeria Adolescent Research and Care Department Adolescent Friendly Research Initiative and Care Ado Ekiti Nigeria Department of Epidemiology Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics Department of Family Medicine McMaster University

Background: Diabetes is one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide, and affects people regardless of country, age group, or sex. Using the most recent evidentiary and analytical framework from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD), we produced location-specific, age-specific, and sex-specific estimates of diabetes prevalence and burden from 1990 to 2021, the proportion of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in 2021, the proportion of the type 2 diabetes burden attributable to selected risk factors, and projections of diabetes prevalence through 2050. Methods: Estimates of diabetes prevalence and burden were computed in 204 countries and territories, across 25 age groups, for males and females separately and combined;these estimates comprised lost years of healthy life, measured in disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs;defined as the sum of years of life lost [YLLs] and years lived with disability [YLDs]). We used the Cause of Death Ensemble model (CODEm) approach to estimate deaths due to diabetes, incorporating 25 666 location-years of data from vital registration and verbal autopsy reports in separate total (including both type 1 and type 2 diabetes) and type-specific models. Other forms of diabetes, including gestational and monogenic diabetes, were not explicitly modelled. Total and type 1 diabetes prevalence was estimated by use of a Bayesian meta-regression modelling tool, DisMod-MR 2.1, to analyse 1527 location-years of data from the scientific literature, survey microdata, and insurance claims;type 2 diabetes estimates were computed by subtracting type 1 diabetes from total estimates. Mortality and prevalence estimates, along with standard life expectancy and disability weights, were used to calculate YLLs, YLDs, and DALYs. When appropriate, we extrapolated estimates to a hypothetical population with a standardised age structure to allow comparison in populations with different age structures. We used the comparative r

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Author Correction: Inferring structural variant cancer cell fraction

引用

Nature communications 2022年第1期13卷 7568页

作者： Marek Cmero Ke Yuan Cheng Soon Ong Jan Schröder Niall M Corcoran Tony Papenfuss Christopher M Hovens Florian Markowetz Geoff Macintyre Department of Surgery Division of Urology Royal Melbourne Hospital and University of Melbourne Parkville VIC 3050 Australia. cmerom@unimelb.edu.au. The Epworth Prostate Centre Epworth Hospital Richmond VIC 3121 Australia. cmerom@unimelb.edu.au. Department of Computing and Information Systems University of Melbourne Parkville VIC 3010 Australia. cmerom@unimelb.edu.au. Bioinformatics Division The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research Parkville VIC Australia. cmerom@unimelb.edu.au. Murdoch Children's Research Institute Parkville VIC 3052 Australia. cmerom@unimelb.edu.au. School of Computing Science University of Glasgow Sir Alwyn Williams Building Glasgow G12 8RZ UK. Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute University of Cambridge Cambridge CB2 0RE UK. Electrical and Electronic Engineering University of Melbourne Parkville VIC 3010 Australia. Machine Learning Research Group Data61 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia. Research School of Computer Science Australian National University Canberra ACT 2601 Australia. Bioinformatics Division The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research Parkville VIC Australia. Department of Surgery Division of Urology Royal Melbourne Hospital and University of Melbourne Parkville VIC 3050 Australia. The Epworth Prostate Centre Epworth Hospital Richmond VIC 3121 Australia. Department of Computing and Information Systems University of Melbourne Parkville VIC 3010 Australia. geoff.macintyre@cruk.cam.ac.uk. Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute University of Cambridge Cambridge CB2 0RE UK. geoff.macintyre@cruk.cam.ac.uk.

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

REFUGE Challenge: A unified framework for evaluating automated methods for glaucoma assessment from fundus photographs

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2019年

作者： Orlando, Jose Ignacio Fu, Huazhu Breda, Jo-Ao Barbossa Keer, Karelvan Bathula, Deepti R. Diaz-Pinto, Andres Fang, Ruogu Heng, Pheng-Ann Kim, Jeyoung Lee, JoonHo Lee, Joonseok Li, Xiaoxiao Liu, Peng Lu, Shuai Murugesan, Balamurali Naranjo, Valery Phaye, Sai Samarth R. Shankaranarayana, Sharath M. Sikka, Apoorva Son, Jaemin Hengel, Antonvanden Wang, Shujun Wu, Junyan Wu, Zifeng Xu, Guanghui Xu, Yongli Yin, Pengshuai Li, Fei Zhang, Xiulan Xu, Yanwu Bogunovic, Hrvoje Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry Medical University of Vienna Spitalgasse 23 Vienna1090 Australia Inception Institute of Artificial Intelligence Abu Dhabi United Arab Emirates Surgery and Physiology Department Ophthalmology Unit Faculty of Medicine University of Porto Porto Research Group Ophthalmology KU Leuven Leuven Belgium Ropar Rupnagar140001 India Instituto de Investigacione Innovacion en Bioingeniera Universitat Politecnica de Valencia Valencia46022 Spain J. Crayton Pruitt Family Dept. of Biomedical Engineering University of Florida 32611 United States Department of Computer Science and Engineering Chinese University of Hong Kong 999077 Hong Kong Gachon University Gyeonggi-Do461-701 Korea Republic of Samsung SDS AI Research Center Seoul06765 Korea Republic of Yale University New HavenCT06510 United States Faculty of Science Beijing University of Chemical Technology Beijing100029 China Healthcare Technology Innovation Centre IIT Madras India Department of Electrical Engineering IIT Madras India VUNO Inc Seoul137-810 Korea Republic of Australian Institute for Machine Learning Australia Cleerly Inc New YorkNY10022 United States South China University of Technology Guangzhou510006 China Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou Shi China Articial Intelligence Innovation Business Baidu Inc China and Cixi Institute of Bio Medical Engineering Chinese Academy of Sciences China

Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of irreversible but preventable blindness in working age populations. Color fundus photography (CFP) is the most cost-effective imaging modality to screen for retinal disorders. However, its application to glaucoma has been limited to the computation of a few related biomarkers such as the vertical cup-to-disc ratio. Deep learning approaches, although widely applied for medical image analysis, have not been extensively used for glaucoma assessment due to the limited size of the available data sets. Furthermore, the lack of a standardize benchmark strategy makes dificult to compare existing methods in a uniform way. In order to overcome these issues we set up the Retinal Fundus Glaucoma Challenge, REFUGE (http://***), held in conjunction with MICCAI 2018. The challenge consistedof two primary tasks, namely optic disc/cup segmentation and glaucoma classification. As part of REFUGE, we have publicly released a data set of 1200 fundus images with ground truth segmentations and clinical glaucoma labels, currently the largest existing one. We have also built an evaluation framework to ease and ensure fairness in the comparison of different models, encouraging the development of novel techniques in the field. 12 teams qualified and participated in the online challenge. This paper summarizes their methods and analyzes their corresponding results. In particular, we observed that two of the top-ranked teams outperformed two human experts in the glaucoma classification task. Furthermore, the segmentation results were in general consistent with the ground truth annotations, with complementary outcomes that can be further exploited by ensembling the results. Copyright © 2019, arXiv, All rights reserved.

关键词： Ophthalmology

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：