版权所有:内蒙古大学图书馆 技术提供:维普资讯• 智图
内蒙古自治区呼和浩特市赛罕区大学西街235号 邮编: 010021
T=题名(书名、题名),A=作者(责任者),K=主题词,P=出版物名称,PU=出版社名称,O=机构(作者单位、学位授予单位、专利申请人),L=中图分类号,C=学科分类号,U=全部字段,Y=年(出版发行年、学位年度、标准发布年)
AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
范例一:(K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 AND Y=1982-2016
范例二:P=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT K=Visual AND Y=2011-2016
Induction control methods offer a potential solution to minimizing wake effects that occur in large wind farms. This paper presents an experimental study on multiple induction control methods for wind farm power maximization. Wind tunnel experiments were conducted on two aligned scaled wind turbines. The upstream turbine was operated with static induction control, periodic dynamic induction control with collective pitch actuation, and dynamic individual pitch control (the helix approach). All wind farm control implementations were compared to a baseline case, which optimized the individual power extraction of both turbines. Tomographic particle image velocimetry was used to measure the wake of the upstream turbine. Based on turbine measurements, grid searches were employed to discover the optimal frequency and amplitude of the pitch actuation in the dynamic induction control cases. While static induction control showed increased wake velocities in the near wake, it did not provide an overall increase in power production of the two-turbine array. Dynamic induction control methods, especially the helix approach in the counterclockwise direction, were seen to significantly increase the total power output compared to the baseline control case. However, this improvement came with a larger amount of pitch actuation and increased fatigue loading of structural components in the fore-aft direction.
电话和邮箱必须正确填写,我们会与您联系确认。
版权所有:内蒙古大学图书馆 技术提供:维普资讯• 智图
内蒙古自治区呼和浩特市赛罕区大学西街235号 邮编: 010021
暂无评论