检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

U. S. NAVAL ACADEMY'S NEW YARD PATROL CRAFT: FROM CONCEPT TO DELIVERY.

Naval Engineers Journal 1987年第1期99卷 37-58页

作者： Compton, Roger H. Chatterton, Howard A. Hatchell, Gordon McGrath, Frank K. Roger H:. Compton is a Webb graduate who since 1966 has been a part of the naval architecture faculty at the U.S. Naval Academy. Since accepting the appointment to the Academy he has been instrumental in establishing the ABET accredited major program in naval architecture in the conceptual design and operation of the Naval Academy Hydromechanics Laboratory and in the conceptual design of the 108-ft yard patrol craft. Besides his Naval Academy involvement he serves as an adjunct professor with Virginia Polytechnic Institute in its NAVSEA Institute graduate program at Crystal City. He is an active member of both ASNE and SNAME and has published technical papers with both societies. Howard A. Chatterton:began his career as a Navy coop student at the Boston Naval Shipyard in 1960. He received his bachelor's degree in naval architecture and marine engineering from Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1966 and his master's degree in 1968. He was employed by the Preliminary Design Division of BuShips in the submarine design and hydrofoil design groups until 1972 when he joined the Coast Guard's Naval Engineering Division. He remained with the Design Branch until 1981 when he accepted a faculty position at the U.S. Naval Academy as the research director for the Academy's hydromechanics laboratory. He has recently returned to Coast Guard Headquarters as the assistant chief Naval Architecture Branch Office of Merchant Marine Safety. Gordon Hatchell:is a naval architect at the Naval Sea Combat Systems Engineering Station Norfolk Virginia in the Combatant Craft Engineering Department. He served as lead-ship YP project engineer from its inception to delivery and continues to serve as project coordinator on follow-up ship procurements. He has worked on other boat procurements as well as serving as weight and stability coordinator. Mr. Hatchell began his engineering career in the Design Division at the Norfolk Naval Shipyard in Portsmouth Virginia after receiving a BS in civil engineering from Virginia Polytec

The design of the new 108-ft yard patrol craft (YPs) for the U. S. Naval Academy is described from its beginnings as a senior midshipman design project, through its preliminary and contract design development at the U. S. Navy's small craft design team headquarters, Naval Sea Combat Systems engineering Station, Norfolk, Virginia (NAVSEACOMBAT-SYSENGSTA-Norfolk). During preliminary and contract design the Naval Academy Hydromechanics Laboratory (NAHL) provided experimental data to support NAVSEA-COMBATSYSENGSTA-Norfolk's design analyses in powering, seakeeping, and maneuvering. Several tradeoff studies of interest to patrol craft designers are presented. Major events in the detail design and construction of the first boat are described from both the designer's and the shipbuilder's points of view. The launching, builder's and sea trials of the first boat are described.

关键词： NAVAL VESSELS

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

CE AND CET GRADUATES.

CE AND CET GRADUATES.

引用

Challenges to civil engineering Educators and Practitioners - Where Should We Be Going?

作者： Keating, James L. Univ of Alabama Civil Engineering Technology Program University AL USA Univ of Alabama Civil Engineering Technology Program University AL USA

ISBN: (纸本)0872624365

A questionnaire has been sent to civil engineering (CE) and civil engineering technology (CET) graduates across the country. This questionnaire was designed to obtain information about the employment patterns, salary patterns and job progression patterns of CE and CET graduates. It has long been a contention that CET graduates are filling positions that have traditionally been filled by CE graduates. Indications from this survey point to a lack of job titles as a possible reason explaining this career pattern. The career progression of both groups seems to be similar.

关键词： civil engineering

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

DESIGN FOR NEW-JERSEY, IOWA, AND DES-MOINES MODERNIZATION

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1984年第3期96卷 25-38页

作者： SIMS, PJ EDWARDS, JR DICKEY, RL SHULL, HS Philip J. Sims:graduated from Webb Institute in 1971 and went to work for the Advance Design Branch of the Naval Ship Engineering Center. He was part of the FFG-7 design team in 1972. The 1973–75 years were spent developing automated early-stage aircraft carrier design procedures and performing carrier design trade-off work in support of the CVV design. He returned to school in 1976 for a masters at M.I. T. The 1977–80 period was spent updating the Navy's destroyer-cruiser early-stage design procedures and performing studies for the CGN-42 reserve FFX and DDX (later DDG 51) projects. Also during this period he was team leader on concept formulation (CONFORM) studies of new ships such as a heavy combatant and a low detectability ship. From 1981 to early 1983 Mr. Sims was Design Integration Manager for the BB-62 and Ship Design Manager for the BB-61 and CA-134. He is presently principal naval architect for the FFX study and also works on the NA TO frigate effort. James F. Edwards Sr:.is the Technical Director Ship Analytics Inc. Washington D.C. Operations and was the Ship Design Manager for the battleship USSNew Jerseyprior to his departure from NAVSEA in August 1983. He joined the U.S. Navy Reserves in 1954 and served on active duty from 1957 to 1960. From 1961 to 1963 he worked for McLaughlin Research Corporation as a section head in the drafting department. From 1963 to 1966 he worked for the Vitro Corporation of America in the Terrier (surface missile systems) Department. In 1966 he participated in the contract design of the first shipboard integrated digital ASW Command and Control system while working for the Stanwick Corporation. In 1967 Mr. Edwards accepted a position at NAVSHIPS in the Combat System Integration Division. In 1974 he transferred to what is currently NAVSEA's Hull Design Division. In 1980 Mr. Edwards was designated as the Battleship and Heavy Cruiser General Arrangements Task Leader and subsequently served as the Hull Task Group Manager the Ship Configuration Control Manager and fina

In reactivating the battleship New Jersey , the Navy faced three major problems. The baseline data on the ship was not readily available or reliable, a new generation cruise missile armament was proposed, and the ship delivery schedule was very tight. After doing a feasibility study, system design engineers were taken onboard the mothballed ship to resolve the design problems. Being on the ship allowed an intensive effort and immediate reference to the actual ship configuration. The tools used to control this effort were a ship check plan, a ship check form and the master arrangement drawing. Simultaneously with the design effort, a repair scoping effort was conducted. The design evolution and solutions to the major problems are described. The results of the New Jersey effort are shown with sample documentation, the ship characteristics and the downstream design effort. The Iowa was the next ship to be modernized. The top level requirements were the same as New Jersey's but new problems were encountered. More options were investigated which diverted attention from the basic effort. A fundamental difference was the Iowa had not had a 1968 reactivation as the New Jersey had, so items that were repair and reactivation on the New Jersey in 1968 had to be part of the Iowa modernization. A major influence on the Iowa design process was that a complete set of specifications for a private yard bid had to be developed. The next effort was to install the same New Jersey modernization payload on a Des Moines class heavy cruiser. Heavy cruisers are large ships but significantly smaller than battleships and much closer to their naval architectural limits of weight and center of gravity. They have much less topside area than the battleships, and the new payload was very topside space consuming. The cruisers are also much more restricted in internal volume. Two feasibility studies were conducted. One resolved volume problems but approached the weight and center of gravity limits.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

THE NO FRAME CONCEPT - ITS IMPACT ON SHIPYARD COST

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1984年第3期96卷 218-232页

作者： NAPPI, NS WALZ, RW WIERNICKI, CJ Natale S. Nappi:graduated from City College of New York in 1954 with a B.S. degree in civil engineering and received his M.S. in civil engineering from the Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn in 1959. He began his professional career in 1954 at the New York Naval Shipyard as a naval architect (structures) performing detail structural design and fabrication studies for CVAs LPDs DDs and CGs and eventually became a supervisory naval architect (structures). From 1965 to 1973 he was a member of the staff of the Computer-Aided Design Division at the David Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center (DTNSRDC). As such he was involved in the development of the computer structural design tool the SSDP (in association with Frank M. Lev) and automated detail design programs (CASDOS). His current position is Senior Naval Architect Consultant in the structural integrity group of the Ship Structures Division Structures Department DTNSRDC. Mr. Nappi is the author and co-author of numerous technical papers and reports covering a wide spectrum of topics such as automated structural design process design for producibility and survivability material weight and cost trade-off studies and structural weight determination for high performance ships (i.e. SES SWATH HYSWAS). He has lectured on the subjects of design for survivability and ship structures at the Naval Post Graduate School and MIT. He is a member of ASNE ASCE U.S. Naval Institute Sigma Xi and is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of New York. Mr. Nappi was a member of the NAVSEA working commitee for the computer supported design planning effort and is currently a member of the DTNSRDC ASSET Advisory Committee. Ronald W. Walz:graduated in 1974 from Pennsylvania State University with a B.S. degree in civil engineering. He began his professional career in 1974 at the David Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center as a structural engineer in the structural design concepts group of the Ship Structures Division Structures Department.

A proposed cost effective alternative to current U.S. Navy structurally configured hulls is presented in this paper. This proposed design for producibility concept involves the elimination of structural stanchions and transverse web frames. The potential impact of this “no frame” concept on structural design, weight and construction and material costs for naval surface frigates and destroyers is reflected in 1) reduced costs for the installation of distributive systems and 2) a reduced number and complexity of structural details providing a more reliable and less costly structure. This study was performed in three parts: 1) Determine the most feasible length between bulkheads without frames; 2) Using this length perform detail weight studies and construction and material costs analysis comparison on a 72-foot long hull module, with and without frames, for a FFG-7, and 3) Estimate the saving in man hours of labor on the installation of distributive systems and shipfitting for an FFG-7. For the feasible length studies on the “no frame” structural configuration, thirty-seven strength, weight and vertical center of gravity studies were performed on two ship classes; twenty-two on the FFG-7 class and fifteen on the DD-963 class. The detailed weight studies and construction and material cost analyses were conducted for FFG-7 “no frame” and “as built” modules. Results indicating the “no frame” concept module was 6.8% heavier and 14.8% less costly than the “as built” module. For the impact of an FFG-7 “no frame” structurally configured hull on the cost of labor required for the installation of distributive systems and for other functional work such as ship fitting, welding, and electrical, this study indicated a reduction of 169,206 labor hours per ship, representing 7.12% of the total required man hours to fabricate an FFG-7 class ship. With the employment of the “no frame” concept, certain areas of significant concern and potential risk were addressed. These include: 1) t

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

PUTTING AN OIL-SPILL CLEANUP COMPUTER-MODEL TO WORK FOR THE NAVY

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1983年第3期95卷 165-172页

作者： NYHART, JD PSARAFTIS, HN YAROSCHAK, PJ Mr. J. D. Nyhart:is professor of management at the Sloan School of Management and the Department of Ocean Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. His current research and writing focus on the use of scientific and technical material in formal judicial and administrative proceedings as well as the development of economic and regulatory models appropriate for deep ocean mining and oil-spill control. Harilaos N. Psaraftis:is Assistant Professor of Marine Systems at the Department of Ocean Engineering at the Operations Research Center at M.I.T. Professor Psaraftis received two M.Sc. degrees in 1977 (in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering and in Shipping and Shipbuilding Management) and a Ph.D. in 1979 (in Ocean Systems Operations Research) all from M.I.T. Professor Psaraftis has been conducting research in problem areas such as the probabilistic modeling of underwater detection and optimal sensor allocation (project sponsored by ONR) the optimization of oil spill cleanup operations (project sponsored by a consortium of government and industry organizations) the development of routing and scheduling algorithms in transportation problems (project sponsored by DOT) and the analysis and solution algorithms of sealift routing and scheduling problems (project sponsored by ONR and the Military Sealift Command). Professor Psaraftis has published in various journals and is currently the Chairman of the Ocean Systems Management Program at M.I.T. Mr. Paul J. Yaroschak:received his Bachelors Degree in Civil Engineering from Villanova University and his Masters Degree in Environmental Engineering from Northeastern University. He has served in the Civil Engineer Corps U.S. Navy in Public Works and Construction Management and as a Project Engineer for Navy-wide Water and Wastewater Treatment Projects for the Naval Facilities Engineering Command. He is currently Head of the Environmental Engineering Branch of the Naval Facilities Engineering Command. Mr. Yaroschak is a Registered Professional Engineer i

A research group at the Massachusetts Institute of technology has completed the first phase of the development of a computer assisted model for analyzing complex decisions and policies regarding oil spill cleanup. The model is the product of an ongoing MIT Sea Grant project, sponsored by a consortium of government and industry organizations, including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the U.S. C oast G uard , the U.S. N avy , the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the Spill Control Association of America, JFB Scientific Corporation, the Doherty Foundation, Petro-Canada and Texaco. The model can be used, among other things, in strategic planning for the long-term oil spill response needs of a region, in assisting On Scene Coordinators in responding to a specific spill (tactical/operational setting), in evaluating the environmental and economic damages of a spill versus the cost of cleanup, in simulation and training, and in the analysis of various policy and regulatory issues such as the effects of delays, the use of dispersants and the investigation of liability and compensation issues. The paper describes the model in detail, focuses on its potential uses and presents experience with its application in conjunction with pollution control efforts of the U.S. Navy. Specifically, we outline the application of the model in the Port of Charleston, South Carolina, an ongoing project sponsored by the Naval Facilities engineering Command. The difficulty of gathering data for such an application is discussed.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

THE STRUCTURAL SYNTHESIS DESIGN program - ITS IMPACT ON THE FLEET

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1983年第3期95卷 87-99页

作者： WIERNICKI, CJ GOODING, TG NAPPI, NS Mr. Christopher J. Wiernicki:graduated from Vanderbilt University in 1980 with a B.E. degree in Structural Engineering. Upon graduation he began his professional career at the David Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center. As a structural engineer in the Surface Ship Structures Division Mr. Wiernicki was responsible for developing improved methods and procedures for designing and evaluating structural systems for surf ace combatants. Specific projects included design for producibility development and evaluation of automated ship structural design methods and participation in the structural design of the CG 49 Cruiser and the current DDG 51 Destroyer. In 1982 Mr. Wiernicki received his M.S. degree in Ocean Engineering from George Washington University. Mr. Wiernicki is a recipient of the SNAME 1982-82 Graduate Scholarship and is currently doing post graduate work in Naval Architecture at Massachusetts Institute of Technology he is a member of ASNE SNAME ASCE and Chi Epsilon. Mr. Thomas G. Gooding:graduated in 1975 from the University of Michigan with B.S. degrees in Oceanography and Naval Architecture. After graduation he began his professional career at the Naval Ship Engineering Center (NA VSEC) as a structural engineer. From 1975 till 1978 Mr. Gooding worked in the area of ship dry docking and was the structural task leader on the complex overhaul ofUSS Long Beach (CGN-9). Mr. Gooding returned to the University of Michigan to receive a M.S. in Naval Architecture in 1979. Currently Mr. Gooding is the structural task leader on the DDGX/DDG 51 program at the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA). Mr. Gooding is a member of SNAME and the Naval Institute. Mr. Natale S. Nappi:graduated from City College of New York in 1954 with a Bachelor of Civil Engineering and received his M.S. in Civil Engineering from Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn in 1959. He began his professional career in 1964 at the New York Naval Shipyard as a Naval Architect (Structure) performing detail structural design and fabrication s

The structural design of a ship's section is a complicated, repetitive and time consuming task. With the advent of new technology, high speed computers have enabled the ship designer to accomplish in a matter of seconds what would formerly take days to accomplish by hand. The Structural Synthesis Design program (SSDP) is a N avy developed computer-aided design tool which is used to design (or to analyze) the longitudinal scantlings for a variety of ship cross sections, consisting of any practical combinations of decks, platforms, bulkheads and materials, i.e., various steel and aluminum alloys. The final hull section design will have the lowest practical weight for the chosen geometric configuration, structural arrangements, and imposed loadings. The scantling developed by the program will satisfy all U.S. N avy ship structural design criteria. An explanation of the objective and design elements of N avy ship structures is included. The rationale behind the SSDP design philosophy is developed along with the significant program capabilities. In an attempt to highlight the influence of automated design procedures on the current naval ship design process, the effect of the SSDP on the DDG 51 destroyer structural development is addressed.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS OF ADVANCED MARINE VEHICLES FOR EXPRESS SHIPPING

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1983年第3期95卷 283-300页

作者： LUEDEKE, G FARNHAM, RB JR. George Luedeke Jr.: received his BS degree in Mechanical Engineering from Massachusetts Institute of Technology and his MS degree in Product Design from Illinois Institute of Technology. Early in his career Mr. Luedeke joined General Motors Corporation as a designer responsible for development of people mover and rail rapid transit systems. From 1964 to 1974 he was with Hughes Aircraft Company. At Hughes he performed analyses and developed designs for a wide variety of program and proposal efforts such as: High Speed Ground Transportation (DOT) Task Force Command Center (NAVY) Panama Canal Marine Traffic Control Center (Panama Canal Co.) Royal Iranian Navy Command Center (Iran) Tactical Information Processing and Interpretation Center (Air Force) and WALLEYE CONDOR and PHOENIX Missile Systems (NAVY). He also had marketing development responsibilities related to the diversification of Hughes resources in civil business areas such as: Automatic train control (WMATA BARTD SCRTD) water/sewage treatment plant automation (Santa Clara County) Aqueduct Control (SWR) Hydrometeorological data collection (BPA WMO) and Salton Sea basin systems analysis (Dept. of the Interior). He was responsible for combat system integration for the Hughes 2000T Surface Effect Ship (SES) proposal. He also conducted detailed studies concerning ship flexure for the Improved Point Defense Target Acquisition System Program and for the definition of operational High Energy Laser weapon installations on a series of conventional monohulls (DLG DD and CVN). Since 1974 Mr. Luedeke has been employed at RMI Inc. (formerly Rohr Marine Inc.). During this time he has held several positions. His responsibilities have included directing a number of studies on advanced SES concepts managing activities defining mission/cost effectiveness of military and commercial SES's including defining the operational benefits and enhanced survivability characteristics of cargo SES's for high speed military sealiftfor NA TO and Southeast Asia

This paper will present the results of a marketing, engineering, and economic analysis of advanced marine vehicles done by IMA Resources, Inc. and RMI, Inc., in support of a Maritime Administration project to study “Multimode Express Shipping”. The study was conducted in 1981 and examined the economic benefits of using advanced marine vehicles as express cargo vessels in domestic and international service. Commodity characteristics, desirable express carrier rates, and potential high payoff service and route alternatives were identified. Advanced marine vehicles were surveyed and sized to meet desirable deadweight and block speed objectives. The costs of operating these craft on a variety of trade routes were calculated using an advanced marine vehicle economic analysis program. Revenues, expenses, break-even, profit and loss, cash flow requirements, tax summary and economic indicators (i.e., cost/ton – mile, etc.) were projected over the expected life of the vehicles as was return on investment. Traffic density and market penetration considerations narrowed the field of choice to smaller sized advanced marine vehicle carriers (i.e., 50 and 250 ton deadweight) and to three international and five domestic routes.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

THE DESIGN OF VARIABLE PAYLOAD SHIPS

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1982年第2期94卷 147-178页

作者： BROOME, GW NELSON, DW TOOTLE, WD Granville W. Broome Jr.:received his BS degree in Civil Engineering from the North Carolina State University in 1967 and MS degree in Naval Architecture from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1970. He started his career at the former Naval Ship Engineering Center working on preliminary structural designs for FFG-7 CVAN-71 and PHM. Subsequently he participated in design integration of FFG-7 DG (AEGIS) CSGN and CG-47 Class ships. Later he served as the Lead Naval Architect for feasibility studies of LSD-41 T-AGOS and T-AO and feasibility studies as well as concept design of ARS-50. Mr. Broome is currently the Head of the Surface Combatant Section (SEA 33112) in the Advanced Design Division of the Naval Sea Systems Command. He is also serving as the Assistant Program Manager for Ship Design Concepts on the Ship Systems Engineering Standards (SSES) Program. In this capacity he is responsible for feasibility studies of the Variable Payload Ships. Mr. Broome is a member of ASNE and ASE. David W. Nelson:graduated from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with a BA degree in History prior to joining the Navy in 1963. He served inUSS Conyngham (DDG-17)and at the Naval Communication Station Greece. Upon release from active duty he entered North Carolina State University where he earned a BS degree in Civil Engineering. He joined the Naval Ship Engineering Center Hyattsville Maryland in 1973. He was the General Arrangements Task Leader for the DD-993 Contract Design the CG-26 Modernization and the DDG-2 Class Conversion. He is currently the Manager for Destroyer Design in the Ship Arrangements (SEA 3211) Group of the Naval Sea Systems Command where his primary responsibility is the general arrangements of DDG-51. He is also the Assistant Program Manager for Ship Design on the Ship Systems Engineering Standards Program. Mr. Nelson is a member of ASNE ASE and SNAME. William D. Tootle:received his BSEE degree from the North Carolina A&T State University in 1960. Between 1960 and 1964 h

This paper presents the issues involved and the approach taken in the design of Variable Payload Ships. The objectives in Variable Payload Ship design are: first, to permit concurrent design and development of the ship and its initial combat system; and second, to simplify the testing, installation, and upgrading of the combat system over a ship's life cycle. In order to accomplish these objectives, Ship Systems engineering Standards and Design Criteria are being developed for the VPS platform and payload. Based on the Mid-Size Combatant design conducted so far, indications are that the abovementioned objectives can be met — giving the Navy maximum flexibility to choose the latest and most appropriate combat suite for each of its surface combatants during both initial acquisition and entire life cycle.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

SHIP DESIGN AND THE NAVY LABORATORY

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1981年第2期93卷 33-46页

作者： ELLSWORTH, WM CLARK, DJ Mr. William M. Ellsworth:is graduate of the State University of Iowa from which he received B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering majoring in Fluid Mechanics. Upon graduation in 1948 he joined the Staff of the David Taylor Model Basin (DTMB) and during the following ten years held various positions in the Hydromechanics Laboratory. In 1958 he left his position as Head of the Towing Problems Branch and joined Cleveland Pneumatic Industries which later became Pneumo Dynamics Corporation (PDC). He was General Manager of PDC's Systems Engineering Division and in 1961 became a corporate Vice President. In 1964 he returned to DTMB where he became the Technical Manager of the Hydrofoil Development Program Office. In October 1969 he was appointed to his present position of Associate Technical Director for Systems Development and Head Systems Development Department David W. Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center. He is a licensed Professional Engineer in the state of Maryland an Honorary Life Member of ASNE and a Fellow of ASME. He also has been the author of a number of papers and reports in the field of Naval Engineering and has served as a member of the ASNE Council from 1972 to 1974 was a member of the ASNE Flagship Section Council (1977-80) and is currently a member of the ASNE Honors and Awards Committee. He became a member of ASNE in 1960 and received his Honorary Life Membership when he was awarded the ASNE Gold Medal for 1973 at ASNE Day 1974. Dennis J. Clark:received his Bachelor's degree in Civil Engineering from City College of New York in 1963. Upon graduating he joined DTMB's Structural Mechanics Laboratory where he worked on a number of full-scale trials of surface ships evaluating the structural integrity of icebreakers sonar domes and Hydrofoils. He eventually was responsible for the entire structural research program in support of the Hydrofoil Advanced Development Office and in 1971 joined the Hydrofoil Program Office as the Manager of Systems Integration. In that capacity he

In today's environment of rapidly escalating costs, increasing technological complexity, and growing threat, we must actively seek ways to improve our effectiveness in applying limited resources to the design of Navy ships. One important aspect of this process involves the development and application of new technology to ship design. An exhaustive treatment of this subject is clearly beyond the scope of a single technical paper. It is the Authors' objective, however, to acquaint the reader with the nature and role of the Navy's Laboratory Community in general and DTNSRDC in particular; to examine some recent initiatives taken at DTNSRDC and some key issues; and, hopefully, to contribute in some small way to the building of a stronger constructive partnership between ship development and design activities. The view is that from the perspective of a Navy Laboratory and pertains to the design of the ship itself as opposed to the weapons system.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Abstracts

引用

Environmental Management 1978年第5期2卷 459-472页

作者： Wilson, M. P. Crockett, P. W. Davidson, M. Grether, D. Wilcox, K. Brown, L. R. Botts, R. P. Grooms, D. W. Roesijadi, G. Anderson, J. W. Giam, S. S. Nicol, J. A. C. Donohue, W. H. Wang, R. T. Winters, K. Haliburton, T. A. Durham, G. N. Brown, K. W. Peters, R. E. Delaney, T. B. Griffin, L. F. Calder, J. A. Harrison, E. A. Owens, E. H. Whitmore, F. C. Hundemann, A. S. Lager, J. A. Smith, W. G. Tchobanoglous, G. Cavagnaro, D. M. Brown, R. J. Kugler, B. A. Rentz, P. E. Pope, L. D. Anderson, G. S. Commins, D. E. Frazier, N. A. Maase, D. L. Clark, R. Baker, J. Bowlin, M. Hansberger, C. Hanson, P. Colwell, R. R. Sayler, G. S. Olivieri, V. P. Kruse, C. W. Kawata, K. Biggs, R. B. Carvey, K. Farrar, D. R. Glenn-Lewin, D. C. Sanborn, J. R. Francis, B. Magnus Metcalf, R. L. Vigon, B. W. Armstrong, D. E. Phillips, R. A. Lynch, C. S. Carlile, B. L. Stewart, J. M. Hamdy, M. K. Dept. of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics Rhode Island Univ. Kingston National Technical Information Service Springfield Lawrence Berkeley Lab. Energy Research and Development Administration California Univ. Berkeley Mississippi State Univ USA Corvallis Environmental Research Lab. Oregon Texas A and M Univ. College Station National Science Foundation Washington D.C. Office for the International Decade of Ocean Exploration USA Marine Science Inst. Texas Univ. at Austin Port Arnasas 0ffice for the International Decade of Ocean Exploration USA Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station Vicksburg Miss Florida State Univ. Tallahassee Dept. of Oceanography National Science Foundation Washington D.C. Coastal Studies Inst. Louisiana State Univ Baton Rouge USA Versar Inc. Springfield Office of Toxic Substances Environmental Protection Agency Washington D.C. Wetcalf and Eddy Inc. Palo Alto Hydro Research Science Santa Clara Municipal Environmental Research Lab. Cincinnati Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc. Canoga Park American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Washington D.C. Transportation Research Board Washington D.C. Battelle Columbus Labs. Industrial Environmental Research Lab. Cincinnati Resource Extraction and Handling Div. USA Boise Ctr. for Urban Research Idaho League of Cities-Conference of Mayors Inc. Washington D.C. Department of Housing & Urban Dev. Asst. Sec. for Policy Dev. & Research Washington D.C. Dept. of Biology Maryland Univ. College Park Environmental Research Lab. Gulf Breeze Johns Hopkins Univ. Baltimore School of Hygiene & Public Health Mun. Env. Res. Lab. Cincinnati Coll. of Marine Studies Delaware Univ. Newark Office of Sea Grant National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Rockville Energy and Mineral Resources Research Inst. Iowa State Univ. of Science and Technology Ames Illinois Natural History Survey Urbana Solid and Hazardous Waste Research Div. Municipal Environmental Research Lab. Cincinnati Wiscon

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：