检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

arXiv 2019年

作者： Kuijf, Hugo J. Biesbroek, J. Matthijs Bresser, Jeroen de Heinen, Rutger Andermatt, Simon Bento, Mariana Berseth, Matt Belyaev, Mikhail Cardoso, M. Jorge Casamitjana, Adrià Collins, D. Louis Dadar, Mahsa Georgiou, Achilleas Ghafoorian, Mohsen Jin, Dakai Khademi, April Knight, Jesse Li, Hongwei Lladó, Xavier Luna, Miguel Mahmood, Qaiser McKinley, Richard Mehrtash, Alireza Ourselin, Sébastien Park, Bo-yong Park, Hyunjin Park, Sang Hyun Pezold, Simon Puybareau, Elodie Rittner, Leticia Sudre, Carole H. Valverde, Sergi Vilaplana, Verónica Wiest, Roland Xu, Yongchao Xu, Ziyue Zeng, Guodong Zhang, Jianguo Zheng, Guoyan Chen, Christopher Flier, Wiesje van der Barkhof, Frederik Viergever, Max A. Biessels, Geert Jan Image Sciences Institute UMC Utrecht Utrecht University Netherlands Brain Center Rudolf Magnus UMC Utrecht Utrecht University Netherlands Department of Radiology UMC Utrecht Department of Radiology LUMC Leiden Netherlands Department of Biomedical Engineering University of Basel Allschwil Switzerland Radiology and Clinical Neuroscience Hotchkiss Brain Institute University of Calgary AB Canada NLP Logix Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences King’s College London Centre for Medical Image Computing University College London Signal Theory and Communications Department Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya BarcelonaTech Barcelona Spain McGill University Canada Computational Statistics and Machine Learning MSc University College London TomTom Amsterdam Netherlands Department of Radiology and Imaging Science National Institutes of Health United States Ryerson University Canada University of Guelph Canada Sun Yat-sen University University of Dundee Technical University of Munich Research institute of Computer Vision and Robotics University of Girona Spain Department of Robotics Engineering Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology Daegu Korea Republic of Pakistan Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology Support Center for Advanced Neuroimaging Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology Inselspital University of Bern Switzerland Electrical and Computer Engineering Department University of British Columbia Vancouver Department of Radiology Brigham and Women’s Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences King’s College London Suwon Korea Republic of School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering Sungkyunkwan University Suwon Korea Republic of France School of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Campinas SP Brazil School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences King’s College London Centre for Medical I

Quantification of cerebral white matter hyperintensities (WMH) of presumed vascular origin is of key importance in many neurological research studies. Currently, measurements are often still obtained from manual segmentations on brain MR images, which is a laborious procedure. Automatic WMH segmentation methods exist, but a standardized comparison of the performance of such methods is lacking. We organized a scientific challenge, in which developers could evaluate their method on a standardized multi-center/-scanner image dataset, giving an objective comparison: the WMH Segmentation Challenge (https://***/).Sixty T1+FLAIR images from three MR scanners were released with manual WMH segmentations for training. A test set of 110 images from five MR scanners was used for evaluation. Segmentation methods had to be containerized and submitted to the challenge organizers. Five evaluation metrics were used to rank the methods: (1) Dice similarity coefficient, (2) modified Hausdorff distance (95th percentile), (3) absolute log-transformed volume difference, (4) sensitivity for detecting individual lesions, and (5) F1-score for individual lesions. Additionally, methods were ranked on their inter-scanner *** participants submitted their method for evaluation. This paper provides a detailed analysis of the results. In brief, there is a cluster of four methods that rank significantly better than the other methods, with one clear winner. The inter-scanner robustness ranking shows that not all methods generalize to unseen *** challenge remains open for future submissions and provides a public platform for method evaluation. Copyright © 2019, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Magnetic resonance imaging

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：