检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

arXiv 2022年

作者： Jelescu, Ileana O. Grussu, Francesco Ianus, Andrada Hansen, Brian Barrett, Rachel L.C. Aggarwal, Manisha Michielse, Stijn Nasrallah, Fatima Syeda, Warda Wang, Nian Veraart, Jelle Roebroeck, Alard Bagdasarian, Andrew F. Eichner, Cornelius Sepehrband, Farshid Zimmermann, Jan Soustelle, Lucas Bowman, Christien Tendler, Benjamin C. Hertanu, Andreea Jeurissen, Ben Verhoye, Marleen Frydman, Lucio de Looij, Yohan van Hike, David Dunn, Jeff F. Miller, Karla Landman, Bennett A. Shemesh, Noam Anderson, Adam McKinnon, Emilie Farquharson, Shawna Acqua, Flavio Dell Pierpaoli, Carlo Drobnjak, Ivana Leemans, Alexander Harkins, Kevin D. Descoteaux, Maxime Xu, Duan Huang, Hao Santin, Mathieu D. Grant, Samuel C. Obenaus, Andre Kim, Gene S. Wu, Dan Le Bihan, Denis Blackband, Stephen J. Ciobanu, Luisa Fieremans, Els Bai, Ruiliang Leergaard, Trygve B. Zhang, Jiangyang Dyrby, Tim B. Johnson, G. Allan Cohen-Adad, Julien Budde, Matthew D. Schilling, Kurt G. Department of Radiology Lausanne University Hospital University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland Radiomics Group Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus Barcelona Spain Queen Square MS Centre Queen Square Institute of Neurology Faculty of Brain Sciences University College London London United Kingdom Champalimaud Research Champalimaud Foundation Lisbon Portugal Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark Department of Neuroimaging Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London United Kingdom NatBrainLab Department of Forensics and Neurodevelopmental Sciences Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London United Kingdom Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine BaltimoreMD United States Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht Netherlands The Queensland Brain Institute The University of Queensland Queensland Australia Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre The University of Melbourne ParkvilleVIC Australia Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences Indiana University IN United States Stark Neurosciences Research Institute Indiana University School of Medicine IN United States Center for Biomedical Imaging NYU Grossman School of Medicine New YorkNY United States Faculty of psychology and Neuroscience Maastricht University Maastricht Netherlands Department of Chemical & Biomedical Engineering FAMU-FSU College of Engineering Florida State University TallahasseeFL United States Center for Interdisciplinary Magnetic Resonance National HIgh Magnetic Field Laboratory TallahasseeFL United States Department of Neuropsychology Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig Germany USC Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Instit

Small-animal diffusion MRI (dMRI) has been used for methodological development and validation, characterizing the biological basis of diffusion phenomena, and comparative anatomy. The steps from animal setup and monitoring, to acquisition, analysis, and interpretation are complex, with many decisions that may ultimately affect what questions can be answered using the resultant data. This work aims to present selected recommendations and guidelines from the diffusion community, on best practices for preclinical dMRI of in vivo animals. We describe the general considerations and foundational knowledge that must be considered when designing experiments. We briefly describe differences in animal species and disease models and discuss why some may be more or less appropriate for different studies. We then give guidelines for in vivo acquisition protocols, including decisions on hardware, animal preparation, and imaging sequences, followed by advice for data processing including pre-processing, model-fitting, and tractography. Finally, we provide an online resource which lists publicly available preclinical dMRI datasets and software packages, to promote responsible and reproducible research. In each section, we attempt to provide guides and recommendations, but also highlight areas for which no guidelines exist (and why), and where future work should focus. While we mainly cover the central nervous system (on which most preclinical dMRI studies are focused), we also provide, where possible and applicable, recommendations for other organs of interest. An overarching goal herein is to enhance the rigor and reproducibility of small animal dMRI acquisitions and analyses, and thereby advance biomedical knowledge. © 2022, CC BY-NC-ND.

关键词： Invertebrates

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Federated Learning Enables Big Data for Rare Cancer Boundary Detection

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2022年

作者： Pati, Sarthak Baid, Ujjwal Edwards, Brandon Sheller, Micah Wang, Shih-Han Reina, G. Anthony Foley, Patrick Gruzdev, Alexey Karkada, Deepthi Davatzikos, Christos Sako, Chiharu Ghodasara, Satyam Bilello, Michel Mohan, Suyash Vollmuth, Philipp Brugnara, Gianluca Preetha, Chandrakanth J. Sahm, Felix Maier-Hein, Klaus Zenk, Maximilian Bendszus, Martin Wick, Wolfgang Calabrese, Evan Rudie, Jeffrey Villanueva-Meyer, Javier Cha, Soonmee Ingalhalikar, Madhura Jadhav, Manali Pandey, Umang Saini, Jitender Garrett, John Larson, Matthew Jeraj, Robert Currie, Stuart Frood, Russell Fatania, Kavi Huang, Raymond Y. Chang, Ken Balana, Carmen Capellades, Jaume Puig, Josep Trenkler, Johannes Pichler, Josef Necker, Georg Haunschmidt, Andreas Meckel, Stephan Shukla, Gaurav Liem, Spencer Alexander, Gregory S. Lombardo, Joseph Palmer, Joshua D. Flanders, Adam E. Dicker, Adam P. Sair, Haris I. Jones, Craig K. Venkataraman, Archana Jiang, Meirui So, Tiffany Y. Chen, Cheng Heng, Pheng Ann Dou, Qi Kozubek, Michal Lux, Filip Michálek, Jan Matula, Petr Keřkovský, Miloš Kopřivová, Tereza Dostál, Marek Vybíhal, Václav Vogelbaum, Michael A. Mitchell, J. Ross Farinhas, Joaquim Maldjian, Joseph A. Yogananda, Chandan Ganesh Bangalore Pinho, Marco C. Reddy, Divya Holcomb, James Wagner, Benjamin C. Ellingson, Benjamin M. Cloughesy, Timothy F. Raymond, Catalina Oughourlian, Talia Hagiwara, Akifumi Wang, Chencai To, Minh-Son Bhardwaj, Sargam Chong, Chee Agzarian, Marc Falcão, Alexandre Xavier Martins, Samuel B. Teixeira, Bernardo C.A. Sprenger, Flávia Menotti, David Lucio, Diego R. LaMontagne, Pamela Marcus, Daniel Wiestler, Benedikt Kofler, Florian Ezhov, Ivan Metz, Marie Jain, Rajan Lee, Matthew Lui, Yvonne W. McKinley, Richard Slotboom, Johannes Radojewski, Piotr Meier, Raphael Wiest, Roland Derrick, Murcia Fu, Eric Haas, Rourke Thompson, John Ormond, David Ryan Badve, Chaitra Sloan, Andrew E. Vadmal, Vachan Waite, Kristin Colen, Rivka R. Pei, Linmin Ak, Murat Srinivasan, Ashok Bapuraj, J. Rajiv Rao, Arvind Wang, Nicholas Yoshiaki, Ota Moritani, Tos University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Pathology Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Informatics Technical University of Munich Bavaria Munich Germany Intel Corporation Santa ClaraCA United States Department of Quantitative Biomedicine University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland Department of Neuroradiology Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany Heidelberg Germany Department of Neuropathology Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany Division of Medical Image Computing German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg Germany Neurology Clinic Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging University of California San Francisco San FranciscoCA United States Symbiosis Center for Medical Image Analysis Symbiosis International University Maharashtra Pune India Department of Neuroimaging and Interventional Radiology National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences Karnataka Bangalore India Department of Radiology School of Medicine and Public Health University of Wisconsin MadisonWI United States Department of Medical Physics School of Medicine and Public Health University of Wisconsin MadisonWI United States Department of Neuroradiology Clinical Neuroscience Center University Hospital Zurich University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust Department of Radiology Leeds United Kingdom Department of Radiology Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School BostonMA United States Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging Massachusetts General Hospital CharlestownMA United States Catalan Institute of Oncology Badalona Spain Consorci MAR Parc de Salut de Barcelona Catalonia Spain Josep Trueta University Hospital Girona Spain

Although machine learning (ML) has shown promise in numerous domains, there are concerns about generalizability to out-of-sample data. This is currently addressed by centrally sharing ample, and importantly diverse, data from multiple sites. However, such centralization is challenging to scale (or even not feasible) due to various limitations. Federated ML (FL) provides an alternative to train accurate and generalizable ML models, by only sharing numerical model updates. Here we present findings from the largest FL study to-date, involving data from 71 healthcare institutions across 6 continents, to generate an automatic tumor boundary detector for the rare disease of glioblastoma, utilizing the largest dataset of such patients ever used in the literature (25,256 MRI scans from 6,314 patients). We demonstrate a 33% improvement over a publicly trained model to delineate the surgically targetable tumor, and 23% improvement over the tumor's entire extent. We anticipate our study to: 1) enable more studies in healthcare informed by large and diverse data, ensuring meaningful results for rare diseases and underrepresented populations, 2) facilitate further quantitative analyses for glioblastoma via performance optimization of our consensus model for eventual public release, and 3) demonstrate the effectiveness of FL at such scale and task complexity as a paradigm shift for multi-site collaborations, alleviating the need for data sharing. © 2022, CC BY.

关键词： Tumors

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Author Correction: BigNeuron: a resource to benchmark and predict performance of algorithms for automated tracing of neurons in light microscopy datasets

引用

Nature methods 2024年第10期21卷 1959页

作者： Linus Manubens-Gil Zhi Zhou Hanbo Chen Arvind Ramanathan Xiaoxiao Liu Yufeng Liu Alessandro Bria Todd Gillette Zongcai Ruan Jian Yang Miroslav Radojević Ting Zhao Li Cheng Lei Qu Siqi Liu Kristofer E Bouchard Lin Gu Weidong Cai Shuiwang Ji Badrinath Roysam Ching-Wei Wang Hongchuan Yu Amos Sironi Daniel Maxim Iascone Jie Zhou Erhan Bas Eduardo Conde-Sousa Paulo Aguiar Xiang Li Yujie Li Sumit Nanda Yuan Wang Leila Muresan Pascal Fua Bing Ye Hai-Yan He Jochen F Staiger Manuel Peter Daniel N Cox Michel Simonneau Marcel Oberlaender Gregory Jefferis Kei Ito Paloma Gonzalez-Bellido Jinhyun Kim Edwin Rubel Hollis T Cline Hongkui Zeng Aljoscha Nern Ann-Shyn Chiang Jianhua Yao Jane Roskams Rick Livesey Janine Stevens Tianming Liu Chinh Dang Yike Guo Ning Zhong Georgia Tourassi Sean Hill Michael Hawrylycz Christof Koch Erik Meijering Giorgio A Ascoli Hanchuan Peng Institute for Brain and Intelligence Southeast University Nanjing China. Microsoft Corporation Redmond WA USA. Tencent AI Lab Bellevue WA USA. Computing Environment and Life Sciences Directorate Argonne National Laboratory Lemont IL USA. Kaya Medical Seattle WA USA. University of Cassino and Southern Lazio Cassino Italy. Center for Neural Informatics Structures and Plasticity Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study George Mason University Fairfax VA USA. Faculty of Information Technology Beijing University of Technology Beijing China. Beijing International Collaboration Base on Brain Informatics and Wisdom Services Beijing China. Nuctech Netherlands Rotterdam the Netherlands. Janelia Research Campus Howard Hughes Medical Institute Ashburn VA USA. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada. Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Intelligent Computation and Signal Processing Anhui University Hefei China. Paige AI New York NY USA. Scientific Data Division and Biological Systems and Engineering Division Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Berkeley CA USA. Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute and Redwood Center for Theoretical Neuroscience UC Berkeley Berkeley CA USA. RIKEN AIP Tokyo Japan. Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology (RCAST) The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan. School of Computer Science University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia. Texas A&M University College Station TX USA. Cullen College of Engineering University of Houston Houston TX USA. Graduate Institute of Biomedical Engineering National Taiwan University of Science and Technology Taipei Taiwan. National Centre for Computer Animation Bournemouth University Poole UK. PROPHESEE Paris France. Department of Neuroscience Columbia University New York NY USA. Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute Columbia University New York NY USA. Department of Computer Science Northern Illinois Universit

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

VPx error resilient video coding using duplicated prediction information 7

VPx error resilient video coding using duplicated prediction...

引用

Visual Information processing and Communication VII 2016

作者： Gadgil, Neeraj Delp, Edward J. Video and Image Processing Laboratory School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Purdue University West LafayetteIN United States

Most real-Time video applications typically demand low endto- end latency and faithful reconstruction of the video sequence. Many popular video coding standards (e.g. VP8, VP9, H.264 and HEVC) aim at achieving high compression efficiencies by exploiting spatial and temporal redundancies. This makes the encoded bitstream vulnerable to errors. Thus, applications especially on mobile phones, tablet PCs and other portable devices that use WiFi or 3G/4G/LTE networks typically suffer from low quality of service typically characterized by frequent delays, jitter, frozen picture, partial/no picture and total loss of connection. Similar scenarios are also often observed while watching live streaming accompanied by service interruptions and a blank screen. Our approach is to investigate error resilient coding control for the VPx encoder to make the bitstream more error resilient for streaming applications under lossy channel conditions. In this paper, we describe an error resilient coding system that uses duplication of frame prediction information. Our "error resilience packet" consists of this prediction information of several frames, that can be used for error concealment in the case of packet loss ©2016 Society for Imaging Science and Technology.

关键词： Forecasting

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Nuclei segmentation of fluorescence microscopy images using convolutional neural networks

Nuclei segmentation of fluorescence microscopy images using ...

引用

IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging

作者： Chichen Fu David Joon Ho Shuo Han Paul Salama Kenneth W. Dunn Edward J. Delp Video and Image Processing Laboratory University West Lafayette Indiana Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Indiana Division of Nephrology University Indianapolis Indiana

ISBN: (纸本)9781509011735

Fluorescence microscopy has emerged as a powerful tool for studying cell biology because it enables the acquisition of 3D image volumes deeper into tissue and the imaging of complex subcellular structures. Quantitative analysis of these structures, which is needed to characterize the structure and constitution of tissue volumes, is facilitated by nuclei segmentation. However, manual segmentation is a laborious and intractable process due to the size and complexity of the data. In this paper, we describe a nuclei segmentation method using a deep convolutional neural network, data augmentation to generate training images of different shapes and contrasts, a refinement process combining segmentation results of horizontal, frontal, and sagittal planes in a volume, and a watershed technique to count the number of nuclei. Our results indicate that compared to 3D ground truth data, our method is able to successfully segment and count 3D nuclei.

关键词： image segmentation Three-dimensional displays Microscopy Convolutional codes Shape Two dimensional displays Neural networks

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Is the winner really the best? A critical analysis of common research practice in biomedical image analysis competitions

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2018年

作者： Maier-Hein, Lena Eisenmann, Matthias Reinke, Annika Onogur, Sinan Stankovic, Marko Scholz, Patrick Arbel, Tal Bogunovic, Hrvoje Bradley, Andrew P. Carass, Aaron Carolin Feldmann Frangi, Alejandro F. Ful, Peter M. van Ginneken, Bram Hanbury, Allan Honauer, Katrin Kozubek, Michal Landman, Bennett A. Marz, Keno Maier, Oskar Maier-Hein, Klaus Menze, Bjoern H. Müller, Henning Neher, Peter F. Niessen, Wiro Rajpoot, Nasir Sharp, Gregory C. Sirinukunwattana, Korsuk Speidel, Stefanie Stock, Christian Stoyanov, Danail Taha, Abdel Aziz van der Sommen, Fons Wang, Ching-Wei Weber, Marc-André Zheng, Guoyan Jannin, Pierre Kopp-Schneider, Annette Heidelberg Germany Centre for Intelligent Machines McGill University MontrealQC Canada Christian Doppler Laboratory for Ophthalmic Image Analysis Department of Ophthalmology Medical University Vienna Vienna Austria Science and Engineering Faculty Queensland University of Technology BrisbaneQLD Australia Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Department of Computer Science Johns Hopkins University Baltimore United States CISTIB Centre for Computational Imaging and Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine University of Sheffield Sheffield United Kingdom Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Medical Image Analysis Radboud University Center Nijmegen Netherlands Institute of Information Systems Engineering TU Wien Vienna Austria Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic Electrical Engineering Vanderbilt University NashvilleTN United States Institute of Medical Informatics Universität zu Lübeck Lübeck Germany Heidelberg Germany Institute for Advanced Studies Department of Informatics Technical University of Munich Munich Germany Information System Institute HES-SO Sierre Switzerland Departments of Radiology Nuclear Medicine and Medical Informatics Erasmus MC Rotterdam Netherlands Department of Computer Science University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom Department of Radiation Oncology Massachusetts General Hospital BostonMA United States Institute of Biomedical Engineering University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden Dresden Germany Heidelberg Germany Department of Computer Science University College London London United Kingdom Data Science Studio Research Studios Austria FG Vienna Austria Department of Electrical Engineering Eindhoven University of Technology Eindhoven Netherlands AIExplore NTUST Center of Computer Vision and Medical Imaging Graduate Institute of Biomedical Engineering National Ta

International challenges have become the standard for validation of biomedical image analysis methods. Given their scientific impact, it is surprising that a critical analysis of common practices related to the organization of challenges has not yet been performed. In this paper, we present a comprehensive analysis of biomedical image analysis challenges conducted up to now. We demonstrate the importance of challenges and show that the lack of quality control has critical consequences. First, reproducibility and interpretation of the results is often hampered as only a fraction of relevant information is typically provided. Second, the rank of an algorithm is generally not robust to a number of variables such as the test data used for validation, the ranking scheme applied and the observers that make the reference annotations. To overcome these problems, we recommend best practice guidelines and define open research questions to be addressed in the future. Copyright © 2018, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Quality control

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

SHAPE MATCHING USING A SELF SIMILAR AFFINE INVARIANT DESCRIPTOR

SHAPE MATCHING USING A SELF SIMILAR AFFINE INVARIANT DESCRIP...

引用

IEEE International Conference on image processing

作者： Joonsoo Kim He Li Jiaju Yue Edward J. Delp Video and Image Processing Laboratory (VIPER) School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Purdue University

ISBN: (纸本)9781467399623

In this paper we introduce a shape descriptor known as Self Similar Affine Invariant (SSAI) descriptor for shape retrieval. The SSAI descriptor is based on the property that two sets of points are transformed by an affine transform, then subsets of each set of points are also related by the same affine transformation. Also, the SSAI descriptor is insensitive to local shape distortions. We use multiple SSAI descriptors based on different sets of neighbor points to improve shape recognition accuracy. We also describe an efficient image matching method for the multiple SSAI descriptors. Experimental results show that our approach achieves very good performance on two publicly available shape datasets.

关键词： Shape retrieval SSAI descriptor Multiple SSAI descriptors Descriptors Affine transformation Set of points Neighbor In-law Shape Subject Headings shape distortion

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Optimization Techniques in computer vision 1

引用

丛书名： Advances in computer vision and Pattern Recognition

2016年

作者： Mongi A. Abidi Andrei V. Gribok Joonki Paik

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Author Correction: Federated learning enables big data for rare cancer boundary detection

引用

Nature communications 2023年第1期14卷 436页

作者： Sarthak Pati Ujjwal Baid Brandon Edwards Micah Sheller Shih-Han Wang G Anthony Reina Patrick Foley Alexey Gruzdev Deepthi Karkada Christos Davatzikos Chiharu Sako Satyam Ghodasara Michel Bilello Suyash Mohan Philipp Vollmuth Gianluca Brugnara Chandrakanth J Preetha Felix Sahm Klaus Maier-Hein Maximilian Zenk Martin Bendszus Wolfgang Wick Evan Calabrese Jeffrey Rudie Javier Villanueva-Meyer Soonmee Cha Madhura Ingalhalikar Manali Jadhav Umang Pandey Jitender Saini John Garrett Matthew Larson Robert Jeraj Stuart Currie Russell Frood Kavi Fatania Raymond Y Huang Ken Chang Carmen Balaña Jaume Capellades Josep Puig Johannes Trenkler Josef Pichler Georg Necker Andreas Haunschmidt Stephan Meckel Gaurav Shukla Spencer Liem Gregory S Alexander Joseph Lombardo Joshua D Palmer Adam E Flanders Adam P Dicker Haris I Sair Craig K Jones Archana Venkataraman Meirui Jiang Tiffany Y So Cheng Chen Pheng Ann Heng Qi Dou Michal Kozubek Filip Lux Jan Michálek Petr Matula Miloš Keřkovský Tereza Kopřivová Marek Dostál Václav Vybíhal Michael A Vogelbaum J Ross Mitchell Joaquim Farinhas Joseph A Maldjian Chandan Ganesh Bangalore Yogananda Marco C Pinho Divya Reddy James Holcomb Benjamin C Wagner Benjamin M Ellingson Timothy F Cloughesy Catalina Raymond Talia Oughourlian Akifumi Hagiwara Chencai Wang Minh-Son To Sargam Bhardwaj Chee Chong Marc Agzarian Alexandre Xavier Falcão Samuel B Martins Bernardo C A Teixeira Flávia Sprenger David Menotti Diego R Lucio Pamela LaMontagne Daniel Marcus Benedikt Wiestler Florian Kofler Ivan Ezhov Marie Metz Rajan Jain Matthew Lee Yvonne W Lui Richard McKinley Johannes Slotboom Piotr Radojewski Raphael Meier Roland Wiest Derrick Murcia Eric Fu Rourke Haas John Thompson David Ryan Ormond Chaitra Badve Andrew E Sloan Vachan Vadmal Kristin Waite Rivka R Colen Linmin Pei Murat Ak Ashok Srinivasan J Rajiv Bapuraj Arvind Rao Nicholas Wang Ota Yoshiaki Toshio Moritani Sevcan Turk Joonsang Lee Snehal Prabhudesai Fanny Morón Jacob Mandel Konstantinos Kamnitsas Ben Glocker Luke V M Dixon Matthew Williams Peter Zamp Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA) University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA. Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA. Department of Informatics Technical University of Munich Munich Bavaria Germany. Intel Corporation Santa Clara CA USA. Department of Neuroradiology Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany. Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) within the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany. Department of Neuropathology Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany. Division of Medical Image Computing German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg Germany. Pattern Analysis and Learning Group Department of Radiation Oncology Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany. Neurology Clinic Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany. Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging University of California San Francisco San Francisco CA USA. Symbiosis Center for Medical Image Analysis Symbiosis International University Pune Maharashtra India. Department of Neuroimaging and Interventional Radiology National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences Bangalore Karnataka India. Department of Radiology School of Medicine and Public Health University of Wisconsin Madison WI USA. Department of Medical Physics School of Medicine and Public Health University of Wisconsin Madison WI USA. Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust Department of Radiology Leeds UK. Department of Radiology Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging Massachusetts General Hospital Charlestown MA USA. Catalan Institute of Oncology Badalona Spain. Consorci MAR Parc de Salut de Barcelona Catalonia Spain. Department of Radiology (IDI

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2019年

作者： Bilic, Patrick Christ, Patrick Li, Hongwei Bran Vorontsov, Eugene Ben-Cohen, Avi Kaissis, Georgios Szeskin, Adi Jacobs, Colin Mamani, Gabriel Efrain Humpire Chartrand, Gabriel Lohöfer, Fabian Holch, Julian Walter Sommer, Wieland Hofmann, Felix Hostettler, Alexandre Lev-Cohain, Naama Drozdzal, Michal Amitai, Michal Marianne Vivanti, Refael Sosna, Jacob Ezhov, Ivan Sekuboyina, Anjany Navarro, Fernando Kofler, Florian Paetzold, Johannes C. Shit, Suprosanna Hu, Xiaobin Lipková, Jana Rempfler, Markus Piraud, Marie Kirschke, Jan Wiestler, Benedikt Zhang, Zhiheng Hülsemeyer, Christian Beetz, Marcel Ettlinger, Florian Antonelli, Michela Bae, Woong Bellver, Míriam Bi, Lei Chen, Hao Chlebus, Grzegorz Dam, Erik B. Dou, Qi Fu, Chi-Wing Georgescu, Bogdan Giró-I-Nieto, Xavier Gruen, Felix Han, Xu Heng, Pheng-Ann Hesser, Jürgen Moltz, Jan Hendrik Igel, Christian Isensee, Fabian Jäger, Paul Jia, Fucang Kaluva, Krishna Chaitanya Khened, Mahendra Kim, Ildoo Kim, Jae-Hun Kim, Sungwoong Kohl, Simon Konopczynski, Tomasz Kori, Avinash Krishnamurthi, Ganapathy Li, Fan Li, Hongchao Li, Junbo Li, Xiaomeng Lowengrub, John Ma, Jun Maier-Hein, Klaus Maninis, Kevis-Kokitsi Meine, Hans Merhof, Dorit Pai, Akshay Perslev, Mathias Petersen, Jens Pont-Tuset, Jordi Qi, Jin Qi, Xiaojuan Rippel, Oliver Roth, Karsten Sarasua, Ignacio Schenk, Andrea Shen, Zengming Torres, Jordi Wachinger, Christian Wang, Chunliang Weninger, Leon Wu, Jianrong Xu, Daguang Yang, Xiaoping Yu, Simon Chun-Ho Yuan, Yading Yue, Miao Zhang, Liping Cardoso, Jorge Bakas, Spyridon Braren, Rickmer Heinemann, Volker Pal, Christopher Tang, An Kadoury, Samuel Soler, Luc van Ginneken, Bram Greenspan, Hayit Joskowicz, Leo Menze, Bjoern Department of Informatics Technical University of Munich Germany Department of Quantitative Biomedicine University of Zurich Switzerland Ecole Polytechnique de Montréal Canada Department of Medical Imaging Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen Netherlands Department of Biomedical Engineering Tel-Aviv University Israel Germany Pattern Analysis and Learning Group Department of Radiation Oncology Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany Philips Research China Philips China Innovation Campus Shanghai China School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences King0s College London London United Kingdom Institute for AI in Medicine Technical University of Munich Germany Department of Computer Science Guangdong University of Foreign Studies China Institute for diagnostic and interventional radiology Klinikum rechts der Isar Technical University of Munich Germany Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology Klinikum Rechts der Isar Technical University of Munich Germany Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital Nanjing University Medical School China Department of Computing Imperial College London London United Kingdom Institute for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Helmholtz Zentrum München Neuherberg Germany Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School United States School of Computer Science and Engineering The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Israel University of Pennsylvania PA United States Pte. Ltd. Singapore Medical Imaging and Reconstruction Lab Department of Engineering Design Indian Institute of Technology Madras India Sensetime Shanghai China Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania United States Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PA United States Co. Ltd China MontréalQC Canada Department of Radiology Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine University of Montréal

In this work, we report the set-up and results of the Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS), which was organized in conjunction with the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2017 and the International Conferences on Medical image Computing and computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2017 and 2018. The image dataset is diverse and contains primary and secondary tumors with varied sizes and appearances with various lesion-to-background levels (hyper-/hypo-dense), created in collaboration with seven hospitals and research institutions. Seventy-five submitted liver and liver tumor segmentation algorithms were trained on a set of 131 computed tomography (CT) volumes and were tested on 70 unseen test images acquired from different patients. We found that not a single algorithm performed best for both liver and liver tumors in the three events. The best liver segmentation algorithm achieved a Dice score of 0.963, whereas, for tumor segmentation, the best algorithms achieved Dices scores of 0.674 (ISBI 2017), 0.702 (MICCAI 2017), and 0.739 (MICCAI 2018). Retrospectively, we performed additional analysis on liver tumor detection and revealed that not all top-performing segmentation algorithms worked well for tumor detection. The best liver tumor detection method achieved a lesion-wise recall of 0.458 (ISBI 2017), 0.515 (MICCAI 2017), and 0.554 (MICCAI 2018), indicating the need for further research. LiTS remains an active benchmark and resource for research, e.g., contributing the liver-related segmentation tasks in http://***/. In addition, both data and online evaluation are accessible via ***. © 2019, CC BY-NC-ND.

关键词： Deep learning

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：