检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

25th Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting CNS-2016, Seogwipo City, South Korea, July 2-7, 2016 Abstracts

BMC NEUROSCIENCE 2016年第1期17卷 1-112页

作者： [Anonymous] Computational Neurobiology Laboratory The Salk Institute for Biological Studies San Diego USA UNIC CNRS Gif sur Yvette France The European Institute for Theoretical Neuroscience (EITN) Paris France ATR Computational Neuroscience Laboratories Kyoto Japan Krembil Research Institute University Health Network Toronto Canada Department of Physiology University of Toronto Toronto Canada Department of Medicine (Neurology) University of Toronto Toronto Canada Department of Physics University of New Hampshire Durham USA Department of Neurophysiology Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology Warsaw Poland Department of Theory Wigner Research Centre for Physics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Budapest Hungary Department of Mathematical Sciences KAIST Daejoen Republic of Korea Department of Mathematics University of Houston Houston USA Department of Biochemistry & Cell Biology and Institute of Biosciences and Bioengineering Rice University Houston USA Department of Biology and Biochemistry University of Houston Houston USA Grupo de Neurocomputación Biológica Dpto. de Ingeniería Informática Escuela Politécnica Superior Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Madrid Spain Department of Biological Sciences University of Southern California Los Angeles USA Center for Neuroscience Korea Institute of Science and Technology Seoul South Korea Department of Neurology Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx USA Center for Neuroscience KIST Seoul South Korea Department of Neuroscience University of Science and Technology Daejon South Korea Systems Neuroscience Group QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute Herston Australia Department of Psychology Yonsei University Seoul South Korea Department of Psychiatry Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong Seoul South Korea Department of Psychiatry Veterans Administration Boston Healthcare System and Harvard Medical School Brockton USA Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering The University of Melbourne Parkvil

A1 Functional advantages of cell-type heterogeneity in neural circuits Tatyana O. Sharpee A2 Mesoscopic modeling of propagating waves in visual cortex Alain Destexhe A3 Dynamics and biomarkers of mental disorders Mitsuo Kawato F1 Precise recruitment of spiking output at theta frequencies requires dendritic h-channels in multi-compartment models of oriens-lacunosum/moleculare hippocampal interneurons Vladislav Sekulić, Frances K. Skinner F2 Kernel methods in reconstruction of current sources from extracellular potentials for single cells and the whole brains Daniel K. Wójcik, Chaitanya Chintaluri, Dorottya Cserpán, Zoltán Somogyvári F3 The synchronized periods depend on intracellular transcriptional repression mechanisms in circadian clocks. Jae Kyoung Kim, Zachary P. Kilpatrick, Matthew R. Bennett, Kresimir Josić O1 Assessing irregularity and coordination of spiking-bursting rhythms in central pattern generators Irene Elices, David Arroyo, Rafael Levi, Francisco B. Rodriguez, Pablo Varona O2 Regulation of top-down processing by cortically-projecting parvalbumin positive neurons in basal forebrain Eunjin Hwang, Bowon Kim, Hio-Been Han, Tae Kim, James T. McKenna, Ritchie E. Brown, Robert W. McCarley, Jee Hyun Choi O3 Modeling auditory stream segregation, build-up and bistability James Rankin, Pamela Osborn Popp, John Rinzel O4 Strong competition between tonotopic neural ensembles explains pitch-related dynamics of auditory cortex evoked fields Alejandro Tabas, André Rupp, Emili Balaguer-Ballester O5 A simple model of retinal response to multi-electrode stimulation Matias I. Maturana, David B. Grayden, Shaun L. Cloherty, Tatiana Kameneva, Michael R. Ibbotson, Hamish Meffin O6 Noise correlations in V4 area correlate with behavioral performance in visual discrimination task Veronika Koren, Timm Lochmann, Valentin Dragoi, Klaus Obermayer O7 Input-location dependent gain modulation in cerebellar nucleus neurons Maria Psarrou, Maria Schilstra, Neil Davey, Benjamin Torben-Ni

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

26th Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting (CNS*2017) of the Organization for Computational Neuroscience Antwerp, Belgium, July 15-20, 2017

引用

BMC NEUROSCIENCE 2017年第SUPPL 1期18卷 59-59页

作者： [Anonymous] Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Indianapolis IN 46032 USA Stark Neurosciences Research Institute Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis IN 46032 USA Department of Mathematics East Carolina University Greenville NC 27858 USA Jülich Supercomputing Centre Forschungszentrum Jülich 52425 Jülich Germany Future Systems Swiss National Supercomputing Centre 8092 Zurich Switzerland User Engagement and Support Swiss National Supercomputing Centre 6900 Lugano Switzerland Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Aix Marseille Univ 13005 Marseille France Simulation Lab Neuroscience Forschungszentrum Jülich Jülich Germany Department of Experimental Psychology Ghent University 9000 Ghent Belgium Donders Center for Cognitive Neuroimaging Radboud University 6525HR Nijmegen The Netherlands Department of Electrical Computer and Energy Engineering University of Colorado Boulder CO 80309 USA Department of Neurosurgery Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Baltimore MD 21287 USA Department of Neurology Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Baltimore MD 21287 USA Department of Otolaryngology Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Baltimore MD 21287 USA INSERM U968 Paris France Sorbonne Universités UPMC University Paris 06 UMR_S 968 Institut de la Vision Paris France CNRS UMR_7210 Paris France Department of Computer Architecture and Technology University of Granada (CITIC) Granada Spain Sorbonne Universités UPMC Univ Paris 06 INSERM CNRS Institut de la Vision Paris France Department of Adaptive Machine Systems Osaka University Osaka Japan Department of Computer Science University of Cergy-Pontoise Cergy-Pontoise France Department of Physics and Astronomy College of Charleston Charleston SC 29424 USA School of Physics Faculty of Science University of Sydney Sydney NSW 2006 Australia Center of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function Australian Research Council Sydney Australia Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Saxony Lei

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Why is the Winner the Best?

Why is the Winner the Best?

引用

Conference on computer vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

作者： M. Eisenmann A. Reinke V. Weru M. D. Tizabi F. Isensee T. J. Adler S. Ali V. Andrearczyk M. Aubreville U. Baid S. Bakas N. Balu S. Bano J. Bernal S. Bodenstedt A. Casella V. Cheplygina M. Daum M. De Bruijne A. Depeursinge R. Dorent J. Egger D. G. Ellis S. Engelhardt M. Ganz N. Ghatwary G. Girard P. Godau A. Gupta L. Hansen K. Harada M. Heinrich N. Heller A. Hering A. Huaulmé P. Jannin A. E. Kavur O. Kodym M. Kozubek J. Li H. Li J. Ma C. Martín-Isla B. Menze A. Noble V. Oreiller N. Padoy S. Pati K. Payette T. Rädsch J. Rafael-Patiño V. Singh Bawa S. Speidel C. H. Sudre K. Van Wijnen M. Wagner D. Wei A. Yamlahi M. H. Yap C. Yuan M. Zenk A. Zia D. Zimmerer D. Aydogan B. Bhattarai L. Bloch R. Brüngel J. Cho C. Choi Q. Dou I. Ezhov C. M. Friedrich C. Fuller R. R. Gaire A. Galdran Á. García Faura M. Grammatikopoulou S. Hong M. Jahanifar I. Jang A. Kadkhodamohammadi I. Kang F. Kofler S. Kondo H. Kuijf M. Li M. Luu T. Martinčič P. Morais M. A. Naser B. Oliveira D. Owen S. Pang J. Park S. Park S. Płotka E. Puybareau N. Rajpoot K. Ryu N. Saeed A. Shephard P. Shi D. Štepec R. Subedi G. Tochon H. R. Torres H. Urien J. L. Vilaça K. A. Wahid H. Wang J. Wang L. Wang X. Wang B. Wiestler M. Wodzinski F. Xia J. Xie Z. Xiong S. Yang Y. Yang Z. Zhao K. Maier-Hein P. F. Jäger A. Kopp-Schneider L. Maier-Hein Division of Intelligent Medical Systems German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Helmholtz Imaging German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Division of Biostatistics German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Division of Medical Image Computing German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences School of Computing University of Leeds Leeds UK Institute of Informatics School of Management HES-SO Valais-Wallis University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland Sierre Switzerland Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Lausanne University Hospital Lausanne Switzerland Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt Ingolstadt Germany Center for Artificial Intelligence and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D) and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA) University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Radiology University of Washington Seattle WA USA Department of Computer Science Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS) University College London London UK Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona & Computer Vision Center Barcelona Spain Division of Translational Surgical Oncology National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC) Dresden Dresden Germany Department of Advanced Robotics Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia Italy Department of Electronics Information and Bioengineering Politecnico di Milano Milan Italy IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Department of General Visceral and Transplantation Surgery Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany Department of Radiology and Nuc

International benchmarking competitions have become fundamental for the comparative performance assessment of image analysis methods. However, little attention has been given to investigating what can be learnt from these competitions. Do they really generate scientific progress? What are common and successful participation strategies? What makes a solution superior to a competing method? To address this gap in the literature, we performed a multicenter study with all 80 competitions that were conducted in the scope of IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021. Statistical analyses performed based on comprehensive descriptions of the submitted algorithms linked to their rank as well as the underlying participation strategies revealed common characteristics of winning solutions. These typically include the use of multi-task learning (63%) and/or multi-stage pipelines (61%), and a focus on augmentation (100%), image preprocessing (97%), data curation (79%), and post-processing (66%). The “typical” lead of a winning team is a computer scientist with a doctoral degree, five years of experience in biomedical image analysis, and four years of experience in deep learning. Two core general development strategies stood out for highly-ranked teams: the reflection of the metrics in the method design and the focus on analyzing and handling failure cases. According to the organizers, 43% of the winning algorithms exceeded the state of the art but only 11% completely solved the respective domain problem. The insights of our study could help researchers (1) improve algorithm development strategies when approaching new problems, and (2) focus on open research questions revealed by this work.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Music, Computing, and Health: A Roadmap for the Current and Future Roles of Music Technology for Health Care and Well-Being

引用

Music and Science 2021年 4卷

作者： Agres, Kat R. Schaefer, Rebecca S. Volk, Anja van Hooren, Susan Holzapfel, Andre Dalla Bella, Simone Müller, Meinard de Witte, Martina Herremans, Dorien Ramirez Melendez, Rafael Neerincx, Mark Ruiz, Sebastian Meredith, David Dimitriadis, Theo Magee, Wendy L. Yong Siew Toh Conservatory of Music National University of Singapore Singapore Social and Cognitive Computing Department Institute of High Performance Computing A*STAR Singapore Institute for Psychology Health Medical Neuropsychology Unit Leiden University Leiden Netherlands Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition Leiden University Leiden Netherlands Academy of Creative and Performing Arts Leiden University Leiden Netherlands Department of Information and Computing Sciences Utrecht University Utrecht Netherlands Faculty of Health care Department of Arts Therapies Zuyd University of Applied Sciences Heerlen Netherlands KenVaK Research Centre for the Arts Therapies and Psychomotricity Heerlen Netherlands Faculty of Psychology Open University of The Netherlands Heerlen Netherlands Division of Media Technology and Interaction Design KTH Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm Sweden International Laboratory for Brain Music and Sound Research (BRAMS) Outremont QC Canada Department of Psychology University of Montreal Montreal QC Canada Centre for Research on Brain Language and Music (CRBLM) Montreal QC Canada University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw Warsaw Poland International Audio Laboratories Erlangen Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Erlangen Germany HAN University of Applied Sciences Department of Arts Therapies and Psychological Studies Nijmegen Netherlands University of Amsterdam Research Institute of Child Development and Education Amsterdam Netherlands Treatment Centre for People with Mild Intellectual Disabilities and Psychiatric and Behavioral Disorders Gennep Netherlands Information Systems Technology and Design Singapore University of Technology and Design Singapore Music and Machine Learning Lab Music Technology Group Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona Spain Faculty of EEMCS Interactive Intelligence Group Delft University of Technology Delft Netherlands Centre for Digital Music School of Electronic Engineerin

The fields of music, health, and technology have seen significant interactions in recent years in developing music technology for health care and well-being. In an effort to strengthen the collaboration between the involved disciplines, the workshop “Music, Computing, and Health” was held to discuss best practices and state-of-the-art at the intersection of these areas with researchers from music psychology and neuroscience, music therapy, music information retrieval, music technology, medical technology (medtech), and robotics. Following the discussions at the workshop, this article provides an overview of the different methods of the involved disciplines and their potential contributions to developing music technology for health and well-being. Furthermore, the article summarizes the state of the art in music technology that can be applied in various health scenarios and provides a perspective on challenges and opportunities for developing music technology that (1) supports person-centered care and evidence-based treatments, and (2) contributes to developing standardized, large-scale research on music-based interventions in an interdisciplinary manner. The article provides a resource for those seeking to engage in interdisciplinary research using music-based computational methods to develop technology for health care, and aims to inspire future research directions by evaluating the state of the art with respect to the challenges facing each field. © The Author(s) 2021.

关键词： health care interdisciplinarity MedTech music information retrieval (MIR) music neuroscience Music psychology music technology music therapy well-being

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

QU-BraTS: MICCAI BraTS 2020 Challenge on Quantifying Uncertainty in Brain Tumor Segmentation - Analysis of Ranking Scores and Benchmarking Results

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2021年

作者： Mehta, Raghav Filos, Angelos Baid, Ujjwal Sako, Chiharu McKinley, Richard Rebsamen, Michael Dätwyler, Katrin Meier, Raphael Radojewski, Piotr Murugesan, Gowtham Krishnan Nalawade, Sahil Ganesh, Chandan Wagner, Ben Yu, Fang F. Fei, Baowei Madhuranthakam, Ananth J. Maldjian, Joseph A. Daza, Laura Gómez, Catalina Arbeláez, Pablo Dai, Chengliang Wang, Shuo Reynaud, Hadrien Mo, Yuanhan Angelini, Elsa Guo, Yike Bai, Wenjia Banerjee, Subhashis Pei, Linmin Murat, A.K. Rosas-González, Sarahi Zemmoura, Ilyess Tauber, Clovis Vu, Minh H. Nyholm, Tufve Löfstedt, Tommy Ballestar, Laura Mora Vilaplana, Veronica McHugh, Hugh Talou, Gonzalo Maso Wang, Alan Patel, Jay Chang, Ken Hoebel, Katharina Gidwani, Mishka Arun, Nishanth Gupta, Sharut Aggarwal, Mehak Singh, Praveer Gerstner, Elizabeth R. Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree Boutry, Nicolas Huard, Alexis Vidyaratne, Lasitha Rahman, Md Monibor Iftekharuddin, Khan M. Chazalon, Joseph Puybareau, Elodie Tochon, Guillaume Ma, Jun Cabezas, Mariano Llado, Xavier Oliver, Arnau Valencia, Liliana Valverde, Sergi Amian, Mehdi Soltaninejad, Mohammadreza Myronenko, Andriy Hatamizadeh, Ali Feng, Xue Dou, Quan Tustison, Nicholas Meyer, Craig Shah, Nisarg A. Talbar, Sanjay Weber, Marc-André Mahajan, Abhishek Jakab, Andras Wiest, Roland Fathallah-Shaykh, Hassan M. Nazeri, Arash Milchenko, Mikhail Marcus, Daniel Kotrotsou, Aikaterini Colen, Rivka Freymann, John Kirby, Justin Davatzikos, Christos Menze, Bjoern Bakas, Spyridon Gal, Yarin Arbel, Tal McGill University MontrealQC Canada Group University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine The University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology University of Bern Inselspital Bern University Hospital Bern Switzerland Department of Radiology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center DallasTX United States Department of Bioengineering University of Texas DallasTX United States Advanced Imaging Research Center University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center DallasTX United States Universidad de los Andes Bogotá Colombia Data Science Institute Imperial College London London United Kingdom NIHR Imperial BRC ITMAT Data Science Group Imperial College London London United Kingdom Department of Brain Sciences Imperial College London London United Kingdom Machine Intelligence Unit Indian Statistical Institute Kolkata India Department of CSE University of Calcutta Kolkata India Department of Information Technology Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden Department of Diagnostic Radiology The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center PittsburghPA United States UMR U1253 iBrain Université de Tours Inserm Tours France Department of Radiation Sciences Umeå University Umeå Sweden Department of Computing Science Umeå University Umeå Sweden Signal Theory and Communications Department Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Barcelona Tech Barcelona Spain Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand Radiology Department Auckland City Hospital Auckland New Zealand Auckland Bioengineering Institute University of Auckland New Zealand Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging Department of Radiology

Deep learning (DL) models have provided state-of-the-art performance in various medical imaging benchmarking challenges, including the Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenges. However, the task of focal pathology multi-compartment segmentation (e.g., tumor and lesion sub-regions) is particularly challenging, and potential errors hinder translating DL models into clinical workflows. Quantifying the reliability of DL model predictions in the form of uncertainties could enable clinical review of the most uncertain regions, thereby building trust and paving the way toward clinical translation. Several uncertainty estimation methods have recently been introduced for DL medical image segmentation tasks. Developing scores to evaluate and compare the performance of uncertainty measures will assist the end-user in making more informed decisions. In this study, we explore and evaluate a score developed during the BraTS 2019 and BraTS 2020 task on uncertainty quantification (QU-BraTS) and designed to assess and rank uncertainty estimates for brain tumor multi-compartment segmentation. This score (1) rewards uncertainty estimates that produce high confidence in correct assertions and those that assign low confidence levels at incorrect assertions, and (2) penalizes uncertainty measures that lead to a higher percentage of under-confident correct assertions. We further benchmark the segmentation uncertainties generated by 14 independent participating teams of QU-BraTS 2020, all of which also participated in the main BraTS segmentation task. Overall, our findings confirm the importance and complementary value that uncertainty estimates provide to segmentation algorithms, highlighting the need for uncertainty quantification in medical image analyses. Finally, in favor of transparency and reproducibility, our evaluation code is made publicly available at https://***/RagMeh11/QU-BraTS. © 2021, CC BY.

关键词： Benchmarking

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

26th Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting (CNS*2017): Part 3 Antwerp, Belgium. 15-20 July 2017 Abstracts

引用

BMC NEUROSCIENCE 2017年第SUPPL 1期18卷 95-176页

作者： [Anonymous] Department of Neuroscience Yale University New Haven CT 06520 USA Department Physiology & Pharmacology SUNY Downstate Brooklyn NY 11203 USA NYU School of Engineering 6 MetroTech Center Brooklyn NY 11201 USA Departament de Matemàtica Aplicada Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Barcelona 08028 Spain Institut de Neurobiologie de la Méditerrannée (INMED) INSERM UMR901 Aix-Marseille Univ Marseille France Center of Neural Science New York University New York NY USA Aix-Marseille Univ INSERM INS Inst Neurosci Syst Marseille France Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Modélisation CNRS UMR 8089 Université de Cergy-Pontoise 95300 Cergy-Pontoise Cedex France Department of Mathematics and Computer Science ENSAT Abdelmalek Essaadi’s University Tangier Morocco Laboratory of Natural Computation Department of Information and Electrical Engineering and Applied Mathematics University of Salerno 84084 Fisciano SA Italy Department of Medicine University of Salerno 84083 Lancusi SA Italy Dipartimento di Fisica Università degli Studi Aldo Moro Bari and INFN Sezione Di Bari Italy Data Analysis Department Ghent University Ghent Belgium Coma Science Group University of Liège Liège Belgium Cruces Hospital and Ikerbasque Research Center Bilbao Spain BIOtech Department of Industrial Engineering University of Trento and IRCS-PAT FBK 38010 Trento Italy Department of Data Analysis Ghent University Ghent 9000 Belgium The Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London London WC1N 3BG UK Department of Electronic Engineering NED University of Engineering and Technology Karachi Pakistan Blue Brain Project École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland Departement of Mathematics Swansea University Swansea Wales UK Laboratory for Topology and Neuroscience at the Brain Mind Institute École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland Institute of Mathematics University of Aberdeen Aberdeen Scotland UK Department of Integrativ

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Mapping geographical inequalities in childhood diarrhoeal morbidity and mortality in low-income and middle-income countries, 2000-17: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 (vol 395, pg 1779, 2020)

引用

LANCET 2020年第10239期395卷 1762-1762页

作者： Reiner, R. C., Jr. Hay, S., I Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation University of Washington Seattle WA United States Department of Global Health School of Medicine University of Washington Seattle WA United States Department of Health Metrics Sciences School of Medicine University of Washington Seattle WA United States College of Health and Medical Sciences Haramaya University Harar Ethiopia Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Haramaya University Harar Ethiopia Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences Haramaya University Harar Ethiopia School of Nursing and Midwifery Haramaya University Harar Ethiopia School of Pharmacy Haramaya University Harar Ethiopia School of Public Health Haramaya University Harar Ethiopia Haramaya University Harar Ethiopia Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Cancer Biology Research Center Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Cancer Research Institute Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Department of Economics and Management Sciences for Health Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Department of Environmental Health Engineering Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Department of Health Management and Economics Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Department of Microbiology Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Department of Pharmacology Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Digestive Diseases Research Institute Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Iran National Institute of Health Research Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Metabolomics and

Summary Background Across low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), one in ten deaths in children younger than 5 years is attributable to diarrhoea. The substantial between-country variation in both diarrhoea incidence and mortality is attributable to interventions that protect children, prevent infection, and treat disease. Identifying subnational regions with the highest burden and mapping associated risk factors can aid in reducing preventable childhood *** We used Bayesian model-based geostatistics and a geolocated dataset comprising 15 072 746 children younger than 5 years from 466 surveys in 94 LMICs, in combination with findings of the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2017, to estimate posterior distributions of diarrhoea prevalence, incidence, and mortality from 2000 to 2017. From these data, we estimated the burden of diarrhoea at varying subnational levels (termed units) by spatially aggregating draws, and we investigated the drivers of subnational patterns by creating aggregated risk factor *** The greatest declines in diarrhoeal mortality were seen in south and southeast Asia and South America, where 54·0% (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 38·1-65·8), 17·4% (7·7-28·4), and 59·5% (34·2-86·9) of units, respectively, recorded decreases in deaths from diarrhoea greater than 10%. Although children in much of Africa remain at high risk of death due to diarrhoea, regions with the most deaths were outside Africa, with the highest mortality units located in Pakistan. Indonesia showed the greatest within-country geographical inequality; some regions had mortality rates nearly four times the average country rate. Reductions in mortality were correlated to improvements in water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) or reductions in child growth failure (CGF). Similarly, most high-risk areas had poor WASH, high CGF, or low oral rehydration therapy *** By co-analysing geospatial trends in d

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

26th Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting (CNS*2017): Part 1

引用

BMC Neurosci 2017年第SUPPL 1期18卷 58-58页

作者： Sue Denham Panayiota Poirazi Erik De Schutter Karl Friston Ho Ka Chan Thomas Nowotny Dongqi Han Sungho Hong Sophie Rosay Tanja Wernle Alessandro Treves Sarah Goethals Romain Brette Tomas Van Pottelbergh Rodolphe Sepulchre Alex D. Bird Hermann Cuntz Pedro J. Gonçalves Jan-Matthis Lueckmann Giacomo Bassetto Marcel Nonnenmacher Jakob H. Macke Audrey J. Sederberg Jason N. MacLean Stephanie E. Palmer Ulisse Ferrari Christophe Gardella Olivier Marre Thierry Mora Emina Ibrahimovic Martin Müller Jean-Pascal Pfister Tushar Chauhan Timothée Masquelier Alexandre Montlibert Benoit R. Cottereau Moritz Helias Jannis Schuecker David Dahmen Sven Goedeke Alexandre Hyafil Ainhoa Hermoso-Mendizabal Pavel E. Rueda-Orozco Santiago Jaramillo David Robbe Jaime de la Rocha Marie Rooy Fani Koukouli David DiGregorio Uwe Maskos Boris Gutkin Andrey Yu Verisokin Darya V. Verveyko Dmitry E. Postnov Willy Wong Omid Talakoub Robert Chen Milos Popovic Dmitriy Lisitsyn Eric Drebitz Iris Grothe Sunita Mandon Andreas Kreiter Udo Ernst Peter A. Robinson Xuelong Zhao Kevin M. Aquino John D. Griffiths Grishma Mehta-Pandejee Natasha Gabay James MacLaurin Somwrita Sarkar Tim Kunze Jens Haueisen Thomas R. Knösche Subutai Ahmad Yuwei Cui Marcus Lewis Jeff Hawkins Simona Olmi Spase Petkoski Fabrice Bartolomei Maxime Guye Viktor Jirsa Hazem Toutounji Daniel Durstewitz Matteo Cantarelli Adrian Quintana Boris Marin Matt Earnshaw Padraig Gleeson Robert Court Robert McDougal R. Angus Silver Salvador Dura-Bernal Stephen Larson William W. Lytton Giovanni Idili Lorenzo Posani Simona Cocco Karel Ježek Rémi Monasson School of Psychology Faculty of Health & Human Sciences Plymouth University Plymouth Devon PL4 8AA UK Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology (IMBB) Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas (FORTH) Heraklion Crete Greece Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University Okinawa Japan Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging Institute of Neurology UCL London WC1N 3BG UK School of Engineering and Informatics University of Sussex Brighton BN1 9QJ UK Graduate School Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Okinawa 904-0495 Japan Computational Neuroscience Unit Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Okinawa 904-0495 Japan Cognitive Neuroscience Area Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati Trieste 34136 Italy Kavli Institute for Systems Neuroscience NTNU Trondheim 7030 Norway Institut de la Vision Sorbonne Universités UPMC Univ Paris 06 INSERM CNRS Paris 75012 France Department of Engineering University of Cambridge Cambridge Cambridgeshire CB2 1PZ UK Ernst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience Max Planck Society Frankfurt Germany Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies Frankfurt Germany Neural Systems Analysis Research Center Caesar An Associate of the Max Planck Society Bonn Germany Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics Tübingen Germany Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Tübingen Germany Present Address: Biomedical Engineering Department Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta GA 30306 USA Department of Neurobiology University of Chicago Chicago IL 60637 USA Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy University of Chicago Chicago IL 60637 USA Committee on Computational Neuroscience University of Chicago Chicago IL 60637 USA Institut de la Vision Sorbonne Universités INSERM Paris France Laboratoire de Physique Statistique Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris France Institute of Molecular Life Sciences University of Zürich 8057 Zürich Switzerland Institute of Neuroinformatics Univer

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Considerations and recommendations from the ISMRM Diffusion Study group for preclinical diffusion MRI: Part 2 — Ex vivo imaging: added value and acquisition

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2022年

作者： Schilling, Kurt G. Grussu, Francesco Ianus, Andrada Hansen, Brian Howard, Amy F.D. Barrett, Rachel L.C. Aggarwal, Manisha Michielse, Stijn Nasrallah, Fatima Syeda, Warda Wang, Nian Veraart, Jelle Roebroeck, Alard Bagdasarian, Andrew F. Eichner, Cornelius Sepehrband, Farshid Zimmermann, Jan Soustelle, Lucas Bowman, Christien Tendler, Benjamin C. Hertanu, Andreea Jeurissen, Ben Verhoye, Marleen Frydman, Lucio de Looij, Yohan van Hike, David Dunn, Jeff F. Miller, Karla Landman, Bennett A. Shemesh, Noam Anderson, Adam McKinnon, Emilie Farquharson, Shawna Acqua, Flavio Dell Pierpaoli, Carlo Drobnjak, Ivana Leemans, Alexander Harkins, Kevin D. Descoteaux, Maxime Xu, Duan Huang, Hao Santin, Mathieu D. Grant, Samuel C. Obenaus, Andre Kim, Gene S. Wu, Dan Le Bihan, Denis Blackband, Stephen J. Ciobanu, Luisa Fieremans, Els Bai, Ruiliang Leergaard, Trygve B. Zhang, Jiangyang Dyrby, Tim B. Allan Johnson, G. Cohen-Adad, Julien Budde, Matthew D. Jelescu, Ileana O. Radiology and Radiological Sciences Vanderbilt University Medical Center NashvilleTN United States Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science Vanderbilt University NashvilleTN United States Radiomics Group Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus Barcelona Spain Queen Square MS Centre Queen Square Institute of Neurology Faculty of Brain Sciences University College London London United Kingdom Champalimaud Research Champalimaud Foundation Lisbon Portugal Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark Department of Bioengineering Imperial College London London United Kingdom FMRIB Centre Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom Department of Neuroimaging Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London United Kingdom NatBrainLab Department of Forensics and Neurodevelopmental Sciences Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London United Kingdom Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine BaltimoreMD United States Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht Netherlands The Queensland Brain Institute The University of Queensland Queensland Australia Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre The University of Melbourne ParkvilleVIC Australia Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences Indiana University IN United States Stark Neurosciences Research Institute Indiana University School of Medicine IN United States Center for Biomedical Imaging NYU Grossman School of Medicine New YorkNY United States Faculty of psychology and Neuroscience Maastricht University Maastricht Netherlands Department of Chemical & Biomedical Engineering FAMU-FSU College of Engineering Florida State University TallahasseeFL United States Center for Interdisciplinary Magnetic Re

The value of preclinical diffusion MRI (dMRI) is substantial. While dMRI enables in vivo non-invasive characterization of tissue, ex vivo dMRI is increasingly being used to probe tissue microstructure and brain connectivity. Ex vivo dMRI has several experimental advantages including higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and spatial resolution compared to in vivo studies, and enabling more advanced diffusion contrasts for improved microstructure and connectivity characterization. Another major advantage of ex vivo dMRI is the direct comparison with histological data, as a crucial methodological validation. However, there are a number of considerations that must be made when performing ex vivo experiments. The steps from tissue preparation, image acquisition and processing, and interpretation of results are complex, with many decisions that not only differ dramatically from in vivo imaging of small animals, but ultimately affect what questions can be answered using the data. This work represents "Part 2" of a 3-part series of recommendations and considerations for preclinical dMRI. We describe best practices for dMRI of ex vivo tissue, with a focus on the value that ex vivo imaging adds to the field of dMRI and considerations in ex vivo image acquisition. We first give general considerations and foundational knowledge that must be considered when designing experiments. We briefly describe differences in specimens and models and discuss why some may be more or less appropriate for different studies. We then give guidelines for ex vivo protocols, including tissue fixation, sample preparation, and MR scanning. In each section, we attempt to provide guidelines and recommendations, but also highlight areas for which no guidelines exist (and why), and where future work should lie. An overarching goal herein is to enhance the rigor and reproducibility of ex vivo dMRI acquisitions and analyses, and thereby advance biomedical knowledge. © 2022, CC BY.

关键词： Image acquisition

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Considerations and Recommendations from the ISMRM Diffusion Study group for preclinical diffusion MRI: Part 1 — In vivo small-animal imaging

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2022年

作者： Jelescu, Ileana O. Grussu, Francesco Ianus, Andrada Hansen, Brian Barrett, Rachel L.C. Aggarwal, Manisha Michielse, Stijn Nasrallah, Fatima Syeda, Warda Wang, Nian Veraart, Jelle Roebroeck, Alard Bagdasarian, Andrew F. Eichner, Cornelius Sepehrband, Farshid Zimmermann, Jan Soustelle, Lucas Bowman, Christien Tendler, Benjamin C. Hertanu, Andreea Jeurissen, Ben Verhoye, Marleen Frydman, Lucio de Looij, Yohan van Hike, David Dunn, Jeff F. Miller, Karla Landman, Bennett A. Shemesh, Noam Anderson, Adam McKinnon, Emilie Farquharson, Shawna Acqua, Flavio Dell Pierpaoli, Carlo Drobnjak, Ivana Leemans, Alexander Harkins, Kevin D. Descoteaux, Maxime Xu, Duan Huang, Hao Santin, Mathieu D. Grant, Samuel C. Obenaus, Andre Kim, Gene S. Wu, Dan Le Bihan, Denis Blackband, Stephen J. Ciobanu, Luisa Fieremans, Els Bai, Ruiliang Leergaard, Trygve B. Zhang, Jiangyang Dyrby, Tim B. Johnson, G. Allan Cohen-Adad, Julien Budde, Matthew D. Schilling, Kurt G. Department of Radiology Lausanne University Hospital University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland Radiomics Group Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus Barcelona Spain Queen Square MS Centre Queen Square Institute of Neurology Faculty of Brain Sciences University College London London United Kingdom Champalimaud Research Champalimaud Foundation Lisbon Portugal Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark Department of Neuroimaging Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London United Kingdom NatBrainLab Department of Forensics and Neurodevelopmental Sciences Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London United Kingdom Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine BaltimoreMD United States Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht Netherlands The Queensland Brain Institute The University of Queensland Queensland Australia Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre The University of Melbourne ParkvilleVIC Australia Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences Indiana University IN United States Stark Neurosciences Research Institute Indiana University School of Medicine IN United States Center for Biomedical Imaging NYU Grossman School of Medicine New YorkNY United States Faculty of psychology and Neuroscience Maastricht University Maastricht Netherlands Department of Chemical & Biomedical Engineering FAMU-FSU College of Engineering Florida State University TallahasseeFL United States Center for Interdisciplinary Magnetic Resonance National HIgh Magnetic Field Laboratory TallahasseeFL United States Department of Neuropsychology Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig Germany USC Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Instit

Small-animal diffusion MRI (dMRI) has been used for methodological development and validation, characterizing the biological basis of diffusion phenomena, and comparative anatomy. The steps from animal setup and monitoring, to acquisition, analysis, and interpretation are complex, with many decisions that may ultimately affect what questions can be answered using the resultant data. This work aims to present selected recommendations and guidelines from the diffusion community, on best practices for preclinical dMRI of in vivo animals. We describe the general considerations and foundational knowledge that must be considered when designing experiments. We briefly describe differences in animal species and disease models and discuss why some may be more or less appropriate for different studies. We then give guidelines for in vivo acquisition protocols, including decisions on hardware, animal preparation, and imaging sequences, followed by advice for data processing including pre-processing, model-fitting, and tractography. Finally, we provide an online resource which lists publicly available preclinical dMRI datasets and software packages, to promote responsible and reproducible research. In each section, we attempt to provide guides and recommendations, but also highlight areas for which no guidelines exist (and why), and where future work should focus. While we mainly cover the central nervous system (on which most preclinical dMRI studies are focused), we also provide, where possible and applicable, recommendations for other organs of interest. An overarching goal herein is to enhance the rigor and reproducibility of small animal dMRI acquisitions and analyses, and thereby advance biomedical knowledge. © 2022, CC BY-NC-ND.

关键词： Invertebrates

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：