检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

arXiv 2024年

作者： Kazerooni, Anahita Fathi Khalili, Nastaran Liu, Xinyang Gandhi, Deep Jiang, Zhifan Anwar, Syed Muhammed Albrecht, Jake Adewole, Maruf Anazodo, Udunna Anderson, Hannah Baid, Ujjwal Bergquist, Timothy Borja, Austin J. Calabrese, Evan Chung, Verena Conte, Gian-Marco Dako, Farouk Eddy, James Ezhov, Ivan Familiar, Ariana Farahani, Keyvan Franson, Andrea Gottipati, Anurag Haldar, Shuvanjan Iglesias, Juan Eugenio Janas, Anastasia Johansen, Elaine Jones, Blaise V. Khalili, Neda Kofler, Florian labella, Dominic Lai, Hollie Anne Van Leemput, Koen Li, Hongwei Bran Maleki, Nazanin McAllister, Aaron S. Meier, Zeke Menze, Bjoern Moawad, Ahmed W. Nandolia, Khanak K. Pavaine, Julija Piraud, Marie Poussaint, Tina Prabhu, Sanjay P. Reitman, Zachary Rudie, Jeffrey D. Sanchez-Montano, Mariana Shaikh, Ibraheem Salman Sheth, Nakul Tu, Wenxin Wang, Chunhao Ware, Jeffrey B. Wiestler, Benedikt Zapaishchykova, Anna Bornhorst, Miriam Deutsch, Michelle Fouladi, Maryam Lazow, Margot Mikael, Leonie Hummel, Trent Kann, Benjamin de Blank, Peter Hoffman, Lindsey Aboian, Mariam Nabavizadeh, Ali Packer, Roger Bakas, Spyridon Resnick, Adam Rood, Brian Vossough, Arastoo Linguraru, Marius George Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Neurosurgery University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Sheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation Children’s National Hospital WashingtonDC United States Sage Bionetworks United States Lab Crestview Radiology Lagos Nigeria McGill University MontrealQC Canada Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Division of Computational Pathology Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine IndianapolisIN United States Department of Neurosurgery The University of Southern California CA United States Department of Radiology Duke University Medical Center DurhamNC United States Mayo Clinic MN United States Center for Global Health Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Informatics Technical University Munich Germany TranslaTUM - Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research Technical University of Munich Germany Cancer Imaging Program National Cancer Institute National Institutes of Health BethesdaMD United States C. S. Mott Children’s Hospital University of Michigan MI United States Biomedical Engineering Rutgers University New BrunswickNJ United States Athinoula A Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging Massachusetts General Hospital BostonMA United States Yale University New HavenCT United States PrecisionFDA U.S. Food and Drug Administration Silver SpringMD United States Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center OH United States Helmholtz AI Helmholtz Munich Germany Department of Radiation Oncology Duke University Medical Center DurhamNC United States Department of Radiology Children’s Health Orange County CA United States Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science Technical University of De

关键词： Deep learning

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Considerations and recommendations from the ISMRM Diffusion Study Group for preclinical diffusion MRI: Part 2 — Ex vivo imaging: added value and acquisition

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2022年

作者： Schilling, Kurt G. Grussu, Francesco Ianus, Andrada Hansen, Brian Howard, Amy F.D. Barrett, Rachel L.C. Aggarwal, Manisha Michielse, Stijn Nasrallah, Fatima Syeda, Warda Wang, Nian Veraart, Jelle Roebroeck, Alard Bagdasarian, Andrew F. Eichner, Cornelius Sepehrband, Farshid Zimmermann, Jan Soustelle, Lucas Bowman, Christien Tendler, Benjamin C. Hertanu, Andreea Jeurissen, Ben Verhoye, Marleen Frydman, Lucio de Looij, Yohan van Hike, David Dunn, Jeff F. Miller, Karla Landman, Bennett A. Shemesh, Noam Anderson, Adam McKinnon, Emilie Farquharson, Shawna Acqua, Flavio Dell Pierpaoli, Carlo Drobnjak, Ivana Leemans, Alexander Harkins, Kevin D. Descoteaux, Maxime Xu, Duan Huang, Hao Santin, Mathieu D. Grant, Samuel C. Obenaus, Andre Kim, Gene S. Wu, Dan Le Bihan, Denis Blackband, Stephen J. Ciobanu, Luisa Fieremans, Els Bai, Ruiliang Leergaard, Trygve B. Zhang, Jiangyang Dyrby, Tim B. Allan Johnson, G. Cohen-Adad, Julien Budde, Matthew D. Jelescu, Ileana O. Radiology and Radiological Sciences Vanderbilt University Medical Center NashvilleTN United States Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science Vanderbilt University NashvilleTN United States Radiomics Group Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus Barcelona Spain Queen Square MS Centre Queen Square Institute of Neurology Faculty of Brain Sciences University College London London United Kingdom Champalimaud Research Champalimaud Foundation Lisbon Portugal Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark Department of Bioengineering Imperial College London London United Kingdom FMRIB Centre Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom Department of Neuroimaging Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London United Kingdom NatBrainLab Department of Forensics and Neurodevelopmental Sciences Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London United Kingdom Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine BaltimoreMD United States Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht Netherlands The Queensland Brain Institute The University of Queensland Queensland Australia Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre The University of Melbourne ParkvilleVIC Australia Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences Indiana University IN United States Stark Neurosciences Research Institute Indiana University School of Medicine IN United States Center for Biomedical Imaging NYU Grossman School of Medicine New YorkNY United States Faculty of psychology and Neuroscience Maastricht University Maastricht Netherlands Department of Chemical & Biomedical Engineering FAMU-FSU College of Engineering Florida State University TallahasseeFL United States Center for Interdisciplinary Magnetic Re

The value of preclinical diffusion MRI (dMRI) is substantial. While dMRI enables in vivo non-invasive characterization of tissue, ex vivo dMRI is increasingly being used to probe tissue microstructure and brain connectivity. Ex vivo dMRI has several experimental advantages including higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and spatial resolution compared to in vivo studies, and enabling more advanced diffusion contrasts for improved microstructure and connectivity characterization. Another major advantage of ex vivo dMRI is the direct comparison with histological data, as a crucial methodological validation. However, there are a number of considerations that must be made when performing ex vivo experiments. The steps from tissue preparation, image acquisition and processing, and interpretation of results are complex, with many decisions that not only differ dramatically from in vivo imaging of small animals, but ultimately affect what questions can be answered using the data. This work represents "Part 2" of a 3-part series of recommendations and considerations for preclinical dMRI. We describe best practices for dMRI of ex vivo tissue, with a focus on the value that ex vivo imaging adds to the field of dMRI and considerations in ex vivo image acquisition. We first give general considerations and foundational knowledge that must be considered when designing experiments. We briefly describe differences in specimens and models and discuss why some may be more or less appropriate for different studies. We then give guidelines for ex vivo protocols, including tissue fixation, sample preparation, and MR scanning. In each section, we attempt to provide guidelines and recommendations, but also highlight areas for which no guidelines exist (and why), and where future work should lie. An overarching goal herein is to enhance the rigor and reproducibility of ex vivo dMRI acquisitions and analyses, and thereby advance biomedical knowledge. © 2022, CC BY.

关键词： Image acquisition

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Corrigendum to “DeepQSP: Identification of Quorum Sensing Peptides Through Neural Network Model” [Results in Engineering 24 (2024) 102878]

引用

Results in Engineering 2024年 24卷

作者： Md. Ashikur Rahman Md. Mamun Ali Kawsar Ahmed Imran Mahmud Francis M. Bui Li Chen Santosh Kumar Mohammad Ali Moni Department of Software Engineering Daffodil International University Daffodil Smart City Birulia Dhaka 1216 Bangladesh Division of Biomedical Engineering University of Saskatchewan 57 Campus Drive Saskatoon SK S7N 5A9 Canada Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Saskatchewan 57 Campus Drive Saskatoon SK S7N 5A9 Canada Bio-photomatiχ Information and Communication Technology Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University Santosh Tangail 1902 Bangladesh Health Informatics Research Lab Department of Computer Science and Engineering Daffodil International University Daffodil Smart City Birulia Dhaka 1216 Bangladesh Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation Vaddeswaram Andhra Pradesh 522302 India AI & Digital Health Technology Artificial Intelligence & Cyber Future Institute Charles Sturt University Bathurst NSW 2795 Australia AI & Digital Health Technology Rural Health Research Institute Charles Sturt University Orange NSW 2800 Australia

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Exascale Deep Learning to Accelerate Cancer Research

Exascale Deep Learning to Accelerate Cancer Research

引用

IEEE International Conference on Big Data

作者： Robert M. Patton J. Travis Johnston Steven R. Young Catherine D. Schuman Thomas E. Potok Derek C. Rose Seung-Hwan Lim Junghoon Chae Le Hou Shahira Abousamra Dimitris Samaras Joel Saltz Oak Ridge National Lab Oak Ridge TN United States Department of Computer Science Stony Brook University Stony Brook NY United States Department of Biomedical Informatics Stony Brook University Stony Brook NY United States

ISBN: (数字)9781728108582

ISBN: (纸本)9781728108599

Deep learning, through the use of neural networks, has demonstrated remarkable ability to automate many routine tasks when presented with sufficient data for training. The neural network architecture (e.g. number of layers, types of layers, connections between layers, etc.) plays a critical role in determining what, if anything, the neural network is able to learn from the training data. The trend for neural network architectures, especially those trained on ImageNet, has been to grow ever deeper and more complex. The result has been ever increasing accuracy on benchmark datasets with the cost of increased computational demands. In this paper we demonstrate that neural network architectures can be automatically generated, tailored for a specific application, with dual objectives: accuracy of prediction and speed of prediction. Using MENNDL- an HPC-enabled software stack for neural architecture search-we generate a neural network with comparable accuracy to state-of-the-art networks on a cancer pathology dataset that is also 16× faster at inference. The speedup in inference is necessary because of the volume and velocity of cancer pathology data; specifically, the previous state-of-the-art networks are too slow for individual researchers without access to HPC systems to keep pace with the rate of data generation. Our new model enables researchers with modest computational resources to analyze newly generated data faster than it is collected.

关键词： Machine learning Cancer Pathology Neural networks Optimization computer architecture Tumors

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Exascale deep learning to accelerate cancer research

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2019年

作者： Patton, Robert M. Johnston, J. Travis Young, Steven R. Schuman, Catherine D. Potok, Thomas E. Rose, Derek C. Lim, Seung-Hwan Chae, Junghoon Hou, Le Abousamra, Shahira Samaras, Dimitris Saltz, Joel Oak Ridge National Lab Oak RidgeTN United States Department of Computer Science Stony Brook University Stony BrookNY United States Department of Biomedical Informatics Stony Brook University Stony BrookNY United States

Deep learning, through the use of neural networks, has demonstrated remarkable ability to automate many routine tasks when presented with sufficient data for training. The neural network architecture (e.g. number of layers, types of layers, connections between layers, etc.) plays a critical role in determining what, if anything, the neural network is able to learn from the training data. The trend for neural network architectures, especially those trained on ImageNet, has been to grow ever deeper and more complex. The result has been ever increasing accuracy on benchmark datasets with the cost of increased computational demands. In this paper we demonstrate that neural network architectures can be automatically generated, tailored for a specific application, with dual objectives: accuracy of prediction and speed of prediction. Using MENNDL–an HPC-enabled software stack for neural architecture search–we generate a neural network with comparable accuracy to state-of-the-art networks on a cancer pathology dataset that is also 16× faster at inference. The speedup in inference is necessary because of the volume and velocity of cancer pathology data;specifically, the previous state-of-the-art networks are too slow for individual researchers without access to HPC systems to keep pace with the rate of data generation. Our new model enables researchers with modest computational resources to analyze newly generated data faster than it is collected. Copyright © 2019, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Multiobjective optimization

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

biomedical image analysis competitions: The state of current participation practice

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2022年

作者： Eisenmann, Matthias Reinke, Annika Weru, Vivienn Tizabi, Minu Dietlinde Isensee, Fabian Adler, Tim J. Godau, Patrick Cheplygina, Veronika Kozubek, Michal Maier-Hein, Klaus Jäger, Paul F. Kopp-Schneider, Annette Maier-Hein, Lena Ali, Sharib Gupta, Anubha Kybic, Jan Noble, Alison de Solórzano, Carlos Ortiz Pachade, Samiksha Petitjean, Caroline Sage, Daniel Wei, Donglai Wilden, Elizabeth Alapatt, Deepak Andrearczyk, Vincent Baid, Ujjwal Bakas, Spyridon Balu, Niranjan Bano, Sophia Bawa, Vivek Singh Bernal, Jorge Bodenstedt, Sebastian Casella, Alessandro Choi, Jinwook Commowick, Olivier Daum, Marie Depeursinge, Adrien Dorent, Reuben Egger, Jan Eichhorn, Hannah Engelhardt, Sandy Ganz, Melanie Girard, Gabriel Hansen, Lasse Heinrich, Mattias Heller, Nicholas Hering, Alessa Huaulmé, Arnaud Kim, Hyunjeong Li, Hongwei Bran Landman, Bennett Li, Jianning Ma, Jun Martel, Anne Martín-Isla, Carlos Menze, Bjoern Nwoye, Chinedu Innocent Oreiller, Valentin Padoy, Nicolas Pati, Sarthak Payette, Kelly Sudre, Carole van Wijnen, Kimberlin Vardazaryan, Armine Vercauteren, Tom Wagner, Martin Wang, Chuanbo Yap, Moi Hoon Yu, Zeyun Yuan, Chun Zenk, Maximilian Zia, Aneeq Zimmerer, David Bao, Rina Choi, Chanyeol Cohen, Andrew Dzyubachyk, Oleh Galdran, Adrian Gan, Tianyuan Guo, Tianqi Gupta, Pradyumna Haithami, Mahmood Ho, Edward Jang, Ikbeom Li, Zhili Luo, Zhengbo Lux, Filip Makrogiannis, Sokratis Müller, Dominik Oh, Young-Tack Pang, Subeen Pape, Constantin Polat, Gorkem Reed, Charlotte Rosalie Ryu, Kanghyun Scherr, Tim Thambawita, Vajira Wang, Haoyu Wang, Xinliang Xu, Kele Yeh, Hung Yeo, Doyeob Yuan, Yixuan Zeng, Yan Zhao, Xin Abbing, Julian Adam, Jannes Adluru, Nagesh Agethen, Niklas Ahmed, Salman Al Khalil, Yasmina Alenyà, Mireia Alhoniemi, Esa An, Chengyang Arega, Tewodros Weldebirhan Avisdris, Netanell Aydogan, Dogu Baran Bai, Yingbin Calisto, Maria Baldeon Basaran, Berke Doga Beetz, Marcel Bian, Hao Blansit, Kevin Bloch, Louise Bohnsack, Robert Bosticardo, Sara Breen, Jack Brudfors, Mikael Brüngel, Raphael Cabezas, Mariano Cacciola, Alb Heidelberg Division of Intelligent Medical Systems Germany Heidelberg HI Helmholtz Imaging Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Heidelberg Division of Biostatistics Germany Heidelberg Division of Medical Image Computing Germany Heidelberg HI Applied Vision Lab Germany IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic Heidelberg Interactive Machine Learning Group Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science and Medical Faculty Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany NCT Heidelberg DKFZ University Hospital Heidelberg Germany School of Computing University of Leeds Leeds United Kingdom SBILab Department of ECE IIIT-Delhi India Faculty of Electrical Engineering Czech Technical University Prague Czech Republic Institute of Biomedical Engineering University of Oxford United Kingdom Center for Applied Medical Research Pamplona Spain Shri Guru Gobind Singhji Institute of Engineering and Technology Maharashtra Nanded India Université de Rouen Normandie France Lausanne Switzerland School of Engineering and Applied Science Harvard University United States ICube University of Strasbourg CNRS France Institute of Informatics School of Management HES-SO Valais-Wallis University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland Techno-Pôle 3 Sierre3960 Switzerland Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Lausanne University Hospital Rue du Bugnon 46 LausanneCH-1011 Switzerland University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology University of Washington United States Wellcome EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences University College London London United Kingdom Visual Artificial Intelligence Lab Oxford Brookes University Oxford United Kingdom Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona & Computer Vision Center Spain Dresden Fetscherstraße 74 PF 64 Dresden01307 Germany

The number of international benchmarking competitions is steadily increasing in various fields of machine learning (ML) research and practice. So far, however, little is known about the common practice as well as bottlenecks faced by the community in tackling the research questions posed. To shed light on the status quo of algorithm development in the specific field of biomedical imaging analysis, we designed an international survey that was issued to all participants of challenges conducted in conjunction with the IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021 conferences (80 competitions in total). The survey covered participants' expertise and working environments, their chosen strategies, as well as algorithm characteristics. A median of 72% challenge participants took part in the survey. According to our results, knowledge exchange was the primary incentive (70%) for participation, while the reception of prize money played only a minor role (16%). While a median of 80 working hours was spent on method development, a large portion of participants stated that they did not have enough time for method development (32%). 25% perceived the infrastructure to be a bottleneck. Overall, 94% of all solutions were deep learning-based. Of these, 84% were based on standard architectures. 43% of the respondents reported that the data samples (e.g., images) were too large to be processed at once. This was most commonly addressed by patch-based training (69%), downsampling (37%), and solving 3D analysis tasks as a series of 2D tasks. K-fold cross-validation on the training set was performed by only 37% of the participants and only 50% of the participants performed ensembling based on multiple identical models (61%) or heterogeneous models (39%). 48% of the respondents applied postprocessing steps. © 2022, CC BY.

关键词： Benchmarking

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Time Series Forecasting of New Cases and New Deaths Rate for COVID-19 using Deep Learning Methods

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2021年

作者： Ayoobi, Nooshin Sharifrazi, Danial Alizadehsani, Roohallah Shoeibi, Afshin Gorriz, Juan M. Moosaei, Hossein Khosravi, Abbas Nahavandi, Saeid Chofreh, Abdoulmohammad Gholamzadeh Goni, Feybi Ariani Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír Mosavi, Amir Department of Mathematics Savitribai Phule Pune University Pune411007 India Department of Computer Engineering School of Technical and Engineering Shiraz Branch Islamic Azad University Shiraz Iran Institute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation Deakin University GeelongVIC3216 Australia Computer Engineering Department Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Mashhad Iran Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering Biomedical Data Acquisition Lab K. N. Toosi University of Technology Tehran Iran Department of Signal Theory Networking and Communications Universidad de Granada Spain Department of Mathematics Faculty of Science University of Bojnord Iran Sustainable Process Integration Laboratory - SPIL NETME Centre Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Brno University of Technology - VUT Brno Technická 2896/2 Brno616 69 Czech Republic Department of Management Faculty of Business and Management Brno University of Technology VUT Brno Kolejní 2906/4 Brno612 00 Czech Republic Faculty of Civil Engineering Technische Universität Dresden Dresden01069 Germany John von Neumann Faculty of Informatics Obuda University Budapest1034 Hungary School of Economics and Business Norwegian University of Life Sciences 1430 Norway

The first known case of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was identified in December 2019. It has spread worldwide, leading to an ongoing pandemic, imposed restrictions and costs to many countries. Predicting the number of new cases and deaths during this period can be a useful step in predicting the costs and facilities required in the future. The purpose of this study is to predict new cases and deaths rate one, three and seven-day ahead during the next 100 days. The motivation for predicting every n days (instead of just every day) is the investigation of the possibility of computational cost reduction and still achieving reasonable performance. Such a scenario may be encountered real-time forecasting of time series. Six different deep learning methods are examined on the data adopted from the WHO website. Three methods are LSTM, Convolutional LSTM, and GRU. The bidirectional extension is then considered for each method to forecast the rate of new cases and new deaths in Australia and Iran countries. This study is novel as it carries out a comprehensive evaluation of the aforementioned three deep learning methods and their bidirectional extensions to perform prediction on COVID-19 new cases and new death rate time series. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that Bi-GRU and Bi-Conv-LSTM models are used for prediction on COVID-19 new cases and new deaths time series. The evaluation of the methods is presented in the form of graphs and Friedman statistical test. The results show that the bidirectional models have lower errors than other models. Several error evaluation metrics are presented to compare all models, and finally, the superiority of bidirectional methods is determined. This research could be useful for organizations working against COVID-19 and determining their long-term plans. Copyright © 2021, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Coronavirus

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Neuropsychiatric Disease Classification Using Functional Connectomics - Results of the Connectomics in NeuroImaging Transfer Learning Challenge

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2020年

作者： Schirmer, Markus D. Venkataraman, Archana Rekik, Islem Kim, Minjeong Mostofsky, Stewart Beth Nebel, Mary Rosch, Keri Seymour, Karen Crocetti, Deana Irzan, Hassna Hütel, Michael Ourselin, Sebastien Marlow, Neil Melbourne, Andrew Levchenko, Egor Zhou, Shuo Kunda, Mwiza Lu, Haiping Dvornek, Nicha C. Zhuang, Juntang Pinto, Gideon Samal, Sandip Bernal-Rusiel, Jorge L. Pienaar, Rudolph Chung, Ai Wern Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston United States German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases Bonn Germany Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Johns Hopkins University Baltimore United States BASIRA lab Faculty of Computer and Informatics Istanbul Technical University Istanbul Turkey School of Science and Engineering Computing University of Dundee United Kingdom Department of Computer Science University of North Carolina at Greensboro United States Center for Neurodevelopmental and Imaging Research Kennedy Krieger Institute Baltimore United States Department of Neurology Johns Hopkins School of Medicine United States Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Baltimore United States Department of Neuropsychology Kennedy Krieger Institute Baltimore United States Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering University College London United Kingdom School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences Kings College London United Kingdom Institute for Womens Health University College London United Kingdom Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience Higher School of Economics Moscow Russia Department of Computer Science University of Sheffield SheffieldS1 4DP United Kingdom Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging Yale University New HavenCT United States Department of Biomedical Engineering Yale University New HavenCT United States Teradyte LLC Coral GablesFL United States Fetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging and Developmental Science Center Division of Newborn Medicine Boston Children’s Hospital Harvard Medical School BostonMA United States

Large, open-source datasets, such as the Human Connectome Project and the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange, have spurred the development of new and increasingly powerful machine learning approaches for brain connectomics. However, one key question remains: are we capturing biologically relevant and generalizable information about the brain, or are we simply overfitting to the data? To answer this, we organized a scientific challenge, the Connectomics in NeuroImaging Transfer Learning Challenge (CNI-TLC), held in conjunction with MICCAI 2019. CNI-TLC included two classification tasks: (1) diagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) within a pre-adolescent cohort;and (2) transference of the ADHD model to a related cohort of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) patients with an ADHD comorbidity. In total, 240 resting-state fMRI (rsfMRI) time series averaged according to three standard parcellation atlases, along with clinical diagnosis, were released for training and validation (120 neurotypical controls and 120 ADHD). We also provided Challenge participants with demographic information of age, sex, IQ, and handedness. The second set of 100 subjects (50 neurotypical controls, 25 ADHD, and 25 ASD with ADHD comorbidity) was used for testing. Classification methodologies were submitted in a standardized format as containerized Docker images through ChRIS, an open-source image analysis platform. Utilizing an inclusive approach, we ranked the methods based on 16 metrics: accuracy, area under the curve, F1-score, false discovery rate, false negative rate, false omission rate, false positive rate, geometric mean, informedness, markedness, Matthews correlation coefficient, negative predictive value, optimized precision, precision, sensitivity, and specificity. The final rank was calculated using the rank product for each participant across all measures. Furthermore, we assessed the calibration curves of each methodology. Five participants submitted their method fo

关键词： Diseases

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

The Brain Tumor Sequence Registration (BraTS-Reg) Challenge: Establishing Correspondence Between Pre-Operative and Follow-up MRI Scans of Diffuse Glioma Patients

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2021年

作者： Baheti, Bhakti Chakrabarty, Satrajit Akbari, Hamed Bilello, Michel Wiestler, Benedikt Schwarting, Julian Calabrese, Evan Rudie, Jeffrey Abidi, Syed Mousa, Mina Villanueva-Meyer, Javier Fields, Brandon K.K. Kofler, Florian Shinohara, Russell Takeshi Iglesias, Juan Eugenio Mok, Tony C.W. Chung, Albert C.S. Wodzinski, Marek Jurgas, Artur Marini, Niccolò Atzori, Manfredo Müller, Henning Grosbröhmer, Christoph Siebert, Hanna Hansen, Lasse Heinrich, Mattias P. Canalini, Luca Klein, Jan Gerken, Annika Heldmann, Stefan Hering, Alessa Hahn, Horst K. Meng, Mingyuan Bi, Lei Feng, Dagan Kim, Jinman Zeineldinal, Ramy A. Karar, Mohamed E. Mathis-Ullrich, Franziska Burgert, Oliver Abderezaei, Javid Pionteck, Aymeric Chopra, Agamdeep Kurt, Mehmet Yan, Kewei Yan, Yonghong Tang, Zhe Ma, Jianqiang Nasser, Sahar Almahfouz Kurian, Nikhil Cherian Meena, Mohit Shamsi, Saqib Sethi, Amit Tustison, Nicholas J. Avants, Brian B. Cook, Philip Gee, James C. Tian, Lin Greer, Hastings Niethammer, Marc Hoopesar, Andrew Hoffmannas, Malte Dalcaar, Adrian V. Christodoulidis, Stergios Estiene, Théo Vakalopoulou, Maria Paragios, Nikos Marcus, Daniel S. Davatzikos, Christos Sotiras, Aristeidis Menze, Bjoern Bakas, Spyridon Waldmannstetter, diana Division of Computational Pathology Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine IndianapolisIN United States Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering Washington University in St. Louis St. LouisMO United States GE HealthCare San RamonCA United States University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology Washington University School of Medicine St. LouisMO United States Institute for Informatics Data Science & Biostatistics Washington University School of Medicine St. LouisMO United States Department of Bioengineering Santa Clara University Santa ClaraCA United States Department of Quantitative Biomedicine University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland Department of Computer Science TUM School of Computation Information and Technology Technical University of Munich Munich Germany Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology School of Medicine Klinikum rechts der Isar Technical University of Munich Munich Germany Department of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital Regensburg Regensburg Germany University Hospital Regensburg Regensburg Germany Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging University of California San FranciscoCA United States Department of Radiology Duke University Medical Center DurhamNC United States Department of Radiology University of California San DiegoCA United States Helmholtz AI Helmholtz Munich Neuherberg Germany Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center Department of Biostatistics Epidemiology and Informatics University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia United States Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School United States Centre for Medical Imaging Computing University College London United Kingdom The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Hong Kong University of Applied Sciences West

Registration of longitudinal brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans containing pathologies is challenging due to dramatic changes in tissue appearance. Although there has been considerable progress in developing general-purpose medical image registration techniques, they have not yet attained the requisite precision and reliability for this task, highlighting its inherent complexity. Here we describe the Brain Tumor Sequence Registration (BraTS-Reg) challenge, as the first public benchmark environment for deformable registration algorithms focusing on estimating correspondences between pre-operative and follow-up scans of the same patient diagnosed with a diffuse brain glioma. The challenge was conducted in conjunction with both the IEEE International Symposium on biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2022 and the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2022. The BraTS-Reg data comprise de-identified multi-institutional multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) scans, curated for size and resolution according to a canonical anatomical template, and divided into training, validation, and testing sets. Clinical experts annotated ground truth (GT) landmark points of anatomical locations distinct across the temporal domain. The training data with their GT annotations, were publicly released to enable the development of registration algorithms. The validation data, without their GT annotations, were also released to allow for algorithmic evaluation prior to the testing phase, which only allowed submission of containerized algorithms for evaluation on hidden hold-out testing data. Quantitative evaluation and ranking was based on the Median Euclidean Error (MEE), Robustness, and the determinant of the Jacobian of the displacement field. The top-ranked methodologies yielded similar performance across all evaluation metrics and shared several methodological commonalities, including pre-alignment, deep neural networks, inverse consistency

关键词： Magnetic resonance imaging

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

The Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge 2023: Focus on Pediatrics (CBTN-CONNECT-DIPGR-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS-PEDs)

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2023年

作者： Kazerooni, Anahita Fathi Khalili, Nastaran Liu, Xinyang Haldar, Debanjan Jiang, Zhifan Anwar, Syed Muhammed Albrecht, Jake Adewole, Maruf Anazodo, Udunna Anderson, Hannah Bagheri, Sina Baid, Ujjwal Bergquist, Timothy Borja, Austin J. Calabrese, Evan Chung, Verena Conte, Gian-Marco Dako, Farouk Eddy, James Ezhov, Ivan Familiar, Ariana Farahani, Keyvan Haldar, Shuvanjan Iglesias, Juan Eugenio Janas, Anastasia Johansen, Elaine Jones, Blaise V. Kofler, Florian labella, Dominic Lai, Hollie Anne Van Leemput, Koen Li, Hongwei Bran Maleki, Nazanin McAllister, Aaron S. Meier, Zeke Menze, Bjoern Moawad, Ahmed W. Nandolia, Khanak K. Pavaine, Julija Piraud, Marie Poussaint, Tina Prabhu, Sanjay P. Reitman, Zachary Rodriguez, Andres Rudie, Jeffrey D. Sanchez-Montano, Mariana Shaikh, Ibraheem Salman Shah, Lubdha M. Sheth, Nakul Shinohara, Russel Taki Tu, Wenxin Viswanathan, Karthik Wang, Chunhao Ware, Jeffrey B. Wiestler, Benedikt Wiggins, Walter Zapaishchykova, Anna Aboian, Mariam Bornhorst, Miriam de Blank, Peter Deutsch, Michelle Fouladi, Maryam Hoffman, Lindsey Kann, Benjamin Lazow, Margot Mikael, Leonie Nabavizadeh, Ali Packer, Roger Resnick, Adam Rood, Brian Vossough, Arastoo Bakas, Spyridon Linguraru, Marius George Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Neurosurgery University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Sheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation Children’s National Hospital WashingtonDC United States Department of Neurosurgery Thomas Jefferson University Hospital PA United States Sage Bionetworks United States Lab Crestview Radiology Lagos Nigeria McGill University MontrealQC Canada Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Neurosurgery The University of Southern California CA United States Department of Radiology Duke University Medical Center United States Mayo Clinic MN United States Center for Global Health Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Informatics Technical University Munich Germany TranslaTUM - Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research Technical University of Munich Germany Cancer Imaging Program National Cancer Institute National Institutes of Health BethesdaMD United States Biomedical Engineering Rutgers University New BrunswickNJ United States Athinoula A Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging Massachusetts General Hospital BostonMA United States Yale University New HavenCT United States PrecisionFDA U.S. Food and Drug Administration Silver SpringMD United States Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center United States Helmholtz AI Helmholtz Munich Germany Department of Radiation Oncology Duke University Medical Center United States Department of Radiology Children’s Health Orange County CA United States Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science Technical University of Denmark Denmark Department of Radiol

Pediatric tumors of the central nervous system are the most common cause of cancer-related death in children. The five-year survival rate for high-grade gliomas in children is less than 20%. Due to their rarity, the diagnosis of these entities is often delayed, their treatment is mainly based on historic treatment concepts, and clinical trials require multi-institutional collaborations. The MICCAI Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge is a landmark community benchmark event with a successful history of 12 years of resource creation for the segmentation and analysis of adult glioma. Here we present the CBTN-CONNECT-DIPGR-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS-PEDs 2023 challenge, which represents the first BraTS challenge focused on pediatric brain tumors with data acquired across multiple international consortia dedicated to pediatric neuro-oncology and clinical trials. The BraTS-PEDs 2023 challenge focuses on benchmarking the development of volumentric segmentation algorithms for pediatric brain glioma through standardized quantitative performance evaluation metrics utilized across the BraTS 2023 cluster of challenges. Models gaining knowledge from the BraTS-PEDs multi-parametric structural MRI (mpMRI) training data will be evaluated on separate validation and unseen test mpMRI dataof high-grade pediatric glioma. The CBTN-CONNECT-DIPGR-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS-PEDs 2023 challenge brings together clinicians and AI/imaging scientists to lead to faster development of automated segmentation techniques that could benefit clinical trials, and ultimately the care of children with brain tumors. © 2023, CC BY.

关键词： Tumors

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：