检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

QU-BraTS: MICCAI BraTS 2020 Challenge on Quantifying Uncertainty in Brain Tumor Segmentation - Analysis of Ranking Scores and Benchmarking Results

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2021年

作者： Mehta, Raghav Filos, Angelos Baid, Ujjwal Sako, Chiharu McKinley, Richard Rebsamen, Michael Dätwyler, Katrin Meier, Raphael Radojewski, Piotr Murugesan, Gowtham Krishnan Nalawade, Sahil Ganesh, Chandan Wagner, Ben Yu, Fang F. Fei, Baowei Madhuranthakam, Ananth J. Maldjian, Joseph A. Daza, Laura Gómez, Catalina Arbeláez, Pablo Dai, Chengliang Wang, Shuo Reynaud, Hadrien Mo, Yuanhan Angelini, Elsa Guo, Yike Bai, Wenjia Banerjee, Subhashis Pei, Linmin Murat, A.K. Rosas-González, Sarahi Zemmoura, Ilyess Tauber, Clovis Vu, Minh H. Nyholm, Tufve Löfstedt, Tommy Ballestar, Laura Mora Vilaplana, Veronica McHugh, Hugh Talou, Gonzalo Maso Wang, Alan Patel, Jay Chang, Ken Hoebel, Katharina Gidwani, Mishka Arun, Nishanth Gupta, Sharut Aggarwal, Mehak Singh, Praveer Gerstner, Elizabeth R. Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree Boutry, Nicolas Huard, Alexis Vidyaratne, Lasitha Rahman, Md Monibor Iftekharuddin, Khan M. Chazalon, Joseph Puybareau, Elodie Tochon, Guillaume Ma, Jun Cabezas, Mariano Llado, Xavier Oliver, Arnau Valencia, Liliana Valverde, Sergi Amian, Mehdi Soltaninejad, Mohammadreza Myronenko, Andriy Hatamizadeh, Ali Feng, Xue Dou, Quan Tustison, Nicholas Meyer, Craig Shah, Nisarg A. Talbar, Sanjay Weber, Marc-André Mahajan, Abhishek Jakab, Andras Wiest, Roland Fathallah-Shaykh, Hassan M. Nazeri, Arash Milchenko, Mikhail Marcus, Daniel Kotrotsou, Aikaterini Colen, Rivka Freymann, John Kirby, Justin Davatzikos, Christos Menze, Bjoern Bakas, Spyridon Gal, Yarin Arbel, Tal McGill University MontrealQC Canada Group University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine The University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology University of Bern Inselspital Bern University Hospital Bern Switzerland Department of Radiology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center DallasTX United States Department of Bioengineering University of Texas DallasTX United States Advanced Imaging Research Center University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center DallasTX United States Universidad de los Andes Bogotá Colombia Data Science Institute Imperial College London London United Kingdom NIHR Imperial BRC ITMAT Data Science Group Imperial College London London United Kingdom Department of Brain Sciences Imperial College London London United Kingdom Machine Intelligence Unit Indian Statistical Institute Kolkata India Department of CSE University of Calcutta Kolkata India Department of Information Technology Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden Department of Diagnostic Radiology The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center PittsburghPA United States UMR U1253 iBrain Université de Tours Inserm Tours France Department of Radiation Sciences Umeå University Umeå Sweden Department of Computing Science Umeå University Umeå Sweden Signal Theory and Communications Department Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Barcelona Tech Barcelona Spain Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand Radiology Department Auckland City Hospital Auckland New Zealand Auckland Bioengineering Institute University of Auckland New Zealand Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging Department of Radiology

Deep learning (DL) models have provided state-of-the-art performance in various medical imaging benchmarking challenges, including the Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenges. However, the task of focal pathology multi-compartment segmentation (e.g., tumor and lesion sub-regions) is particularly challenging, and potential errors hinder translating DL models into clinical workflows. Quantifying the reliability of DL model predictions in the form of uncertainties could enable clinical review of the most uncertain regions, thereby building trust and paving the way toward clinical translation. Several uncertainty estimation methods have recently been introduced for DL medical image segmentation tasks. Developing scores to evaluate and compare the performance of uncertainty measures will assist the end-user in making more informed decisions. In this study, we explore and evaluate a score developed during the BraTS 2019 and BraTS 2020 task on uncertainty quantification (QU-BraTS) and designed to assess and rank uncertainty estimates for brain tumor multi-compartment segmentation. This score (1) rewards uncertainty estimates that produce high confidence in correct assertions and those that assign low confidence levels at incorrect assertions, and (2) penalizes uncertainty measures that lead to a higher percentage of under-confident correct assertions. We further benchmark the segmentation uncertainties generated by 14 independent participating teams of QU-BraTS 2020, all of which also participated in the main BraTS segmentation task. Overall, our findings confirm the importance and complementary value that uncertainty estimates provide to segmentation algorithms, highlighting the need for uncertainty quantification in medical image analyses. Finally, in favor of transparency and reproducibility, our evaluation code is made publicly available at https://***/RagMeh11/QU-BraTS. © 2021, CC BY.

关键词： Benchmarking

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Development of smartphone application for evaluation of passenger comfort

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2019年

作者： Machaj, Juraj Brida, Peter Krejcar, Ondrej Petkovic, Milica Shi, Quingjiang University of Zilina Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology Department of Multimedia and Information-Communication Technology Univerzitna 1 Zilina010 26 Slovakia Center for Basic and Applied Research Faculty of Informatics and Management University of Hradec Kralove Rokitanskeho 62 Hradec Kralove500 03 Czech Republic Faculty of Technical Sciences University of Novi Sad Trg Dositeja Obradovića 6 Novi Sad21000 Serbia School of Software Engineering Tongji University 4800 Cao an Road Shanghai201804 China

Nowadays, smartphones are not utilized for communications only. Smartphones are equipped with a lot of sensors that can be utilized for different purposes. For example, inertial sensors have been used extensively in recent years for measuring and monitoring performance in many different applications. Basically, data from the sensors are utilized for estimation of smartphone orientation. There is a lot of applications which can utilize these data. This paper deals with an algorithm developed for inertial sensors data utilization for vehicle passenger comfort assessment. Copyright © 2019, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Smartphones

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

A mobile cloud-based ehealth scheme

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2020年

作者： Liu, Yihe Abbasi, Aaqif Afzaal Aghaei, Atefeh Abbasi, Almas Mosavi, Amir Shamshirband, Shahab Al-qaness, Mohammed A.A. Data Recovery Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province College of Computer Science and AI Neijiang Normal University Neijiang641100 China Department of Software Engineering Foundation University Islamabad44000 Pakistan Department of Communication Faculty of Social Sciences University of Tehran Tehran*** Iran Department of Computer Science International Islamic University Islamabad46000 Pakistan Institute of Research and Development Duy Tan University Da Nang550000 Viet Nam Kalman Kando Faculty of Electrical Engineering Obuda University Budapest1034 Hungary School of the Built Environment Oxford Brookes University OxfordOX3 0BP United Kingdom Department for Management of Science and Technology Development Ton Duc Thang University Ho Chi Minh City Viet Nam Faculty of Information Technology Ton Duc Thang University Ho Chi Minh City Viet Nam School of Computer Science Wuhan University Wuhan430072 China

Mobile cloud computing is an emerging field that is gaining popularity across borders at a rapid pace. Similarly, the field of health informatics is also considered as an extremely important field. This work observes the collaboration between these two fields to solve the traditional problem of extracting Electrocardiogram signals from trace reports and then performing analysis. The developed system has two front ends, the first dedicated for the user to perform the photographing of the trace report. Once the photographing is complete, mobile computing is used to extract the signal. Once the signal is extracted, it is uploaded into the server and further analysis is performed on the signal in the cloud. Once this is done, the second interface, intended for the use of the physician, can download and view the trace from the cloud. The data is securely held using a password-based authentication method. The system presented here is one of the first attempts at delivering the total solution, and after further upgrades, it will be possible to deploy the system in a commercial *** Codes 68T05 Copyright © 2020, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Signal analysis

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

The repertoire of mutational signatures in human cancer (vol 578, pg 94, 2020)

引用

NATURE 2023年第7948期614卷 E41-E41页

作者： Alexandrov, Ludmil B. Kim, Jaegil Haradhvala, Nicholas J. Huang, Mi Ni Ng, Alvin Wei Tian Wu, Yang Boot, Arnoud Covington, Kyle R. Gordenin, Dmitry A. Bergstrom, Erik N. Islam, S. M. Ashiqul Lopez-Bigas, Nuria Klimczak, Leszek J. McPherson, John R. Morganella, Sandro Sabarinathan, Radhakrishnan Wheeler, David A. Mustonen, Ville Getz, Gad Rozen, Steven G. Stratton, Michael R. Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine Department of Bioengineering Moores Cancer Center University of California San Diego CA USA Wellcome Sanger Institute Wellcome Genome Campus Hinxton UK Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and Department of Bioengineering University of California San Diego La Jolla CA USA UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center San Diego CA USA University of California San Diego San Diego CA USA Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard Cambridge MA USA Center for Cancer Research Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA Department of Pathology Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA Laboratory for Medical Science Mathematics RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences Yokohama Japan Computational Biology Program Ontario Institute for Cancer Research Toronto ON Canada Programme in Cancer & Stem Cell Biology Duke-NUS Medical School Singapore Singapore Centre for Computational Biology Duke-NUS Medical School Singapore Singapore Programme in Cancer and Stem Cell Biology Duke-NUS Medical School Singapore Singapore Programme in Cancer and Stem Cell Biology Centre for Computational Biology Duke-NUS Medical School Singapore Singapore SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute of Precision Medicine National Heart Centre Singapore Singapore Singapore Cancer Science Institute of Singapore National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology Singapore Singapore Laboratory of Cancer Epigenome Division of Medical Science National Cancer Centre Singapore Singapore Singapore Duke-NUS Medical School Singapore Singapore Human Genome Sequencing Center Baylor College of Medicine Houston TX USA Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center Baylor College of Medicine Houston TX USA Department of Molecular and Human Genetics Baylor College of Medicine Houston TX USA Genome Integrity and Structural Biology Laboratory National Ins

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Patterns of somatic structural variation in human cancer genomes (vol 578, pg 112, 2020)

引用

NATURE 2023年第7948期614卷 E38-E38页

作者： Li, Yilong Roberts, Nicola D. Wala, Jeremiah A. Shapira, Ofer Schumacher, Steven E. Kumar, Kiran Khurana, Ekta Waszak, Sebastian Korbel, Jan O. Haber, James E. Imielinski, Marcin Weischenfeldt, Joachim Beroukhim, Rameen Campbell, Peter J. Cancer Genome Project Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute Hinxton UK Totient Inc Cambridge MA USA Wellcome Sanger Institute Wellcome Genome Campus Hinxton UK Department of Haematology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Cambridge UK Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology Daejeon South Korea Department of Zoology Genetics and Physical Anthropology University of Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain Centre for Research in Molecular Medicine and Chronic Diseases (CIMUS) University of Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain The Biomedical Research Centre (CINBIO) University of Vigo Vigo Spain Centre for Research in Molecular Medicine and Chronic Diseases (CiMUS) Universidade de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain Department of Zoology Genetics and Physical Anthropology (CiMUS) Universidade de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain The Biomedical Research Centre (CINBIO) Universidade de Vigo Vigo Spain The Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT Cambridge MA USA Bioinformatics and Integrative Genomics Harvard University Cambridge MA USA Department of Cancer Biology Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA USA Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard Cambridge MA USA Department of Medical Oncology Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA USA Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Cancer Research Charlestown MA USA Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA USA Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA Department of Physiology and Biophysics Weill Cornell Medicine New York NY USA Institute for Computational Biomedicine Weill Cornell Medicine New York NY USA Controlled Department and Institution New York NY USA Englander Institute for Precision Medicine Weill Cornell Medicine Ne

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

The evolutionary history of 2,658 cancers (vol 578, pg 122, 2020)

引用

NATURE 2023年第7948期614卷 E42-E42页

作者： Gerstung, Moritz Jolly, Clemency Leshchiner, Ignaty Dentro, Stefan C. Gonzalez, Santiago Rosebrock, Daniel Mitchell, Thomas J. Rubanova, Yulia Anur, Pavana Yu, Kaixian Tarabichi, Maxime Deshwar, Amit Wintersinger, Jeff Kleinheinz, Kortine Vazquez-Garcia, Ignacio Haase, Kerstin Jerman, Lara Sengupta, Subhajit Macintyre, Geoff Malikic, Salem Donmez, Nilgun Livitz, Dimitri G. Cmero, Marek Demeulemeester, Jonas Schumacher, Steven Fan, Yu Yao, Xiaotong Lee, Juhee Schlesner, Matthias Boutros, Paul C. Bowtell, David D. Zhu, Hongtu Getz, Gad Imielinski, Marcin Beroukhim, Rameen Sahinalp, S. Cenk Ji, Yuan Peifer, Martin Markowetz, Florian Mustonen, Ville Yuan, Ke Wang, Wenyi Morris, Quaid D. Spellman, Paul T. Wedge, David C. Van Loo, Peter European Molecular Biology Laboratory European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI) Cambridge UK European Molecular Biology Laboratory Genome Biology Unit Heidelberg Germany Wellcome Sanger Institute Cambridge UK Genome Biology Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) Heidelberg Germany University of Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia The Francis Crick Institute London UK Big Data Institute University of Oxford Oxford UK Wellcome Sanger Institute Wellcome Genome Campus Hinxton UK Big Data Institute Li Ka Shing Centre University of Oxford Oxford UK University of Cambridge Cambridge UK Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Cambridge UK Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics Centre for Mathematical Sciences University of Cambridge Cambridge UK Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA Department of Statistics Columbia University New York NY USA Department of Haematology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK University of Leuven Leuven Belgium Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard Cambridge MA USA Center for Cancer Research Massachusetts General Hospital Charlestown MA USA Department of Pathology Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA Center for Cancer Research Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA USA Department of Medical Oncology Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA USA Department of Cancer Biology Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA USA Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Oxford UK Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre University of Oxford Oxford UK University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada Vector Institute Toronto Ontario Canada Vector Institute Toronto ON Canada Department of Computer Science University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada Ontario Institute for Cancer Research Toronto Ontario Canada University of California Los Angeles

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Considerations and recommendations from the ISMRM Diffusion Study group for preclinical diffusion MRI: Part 2 — Ex vivo imaging: added value and acquisition

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2022年

作者： Schilling, Kurt G. Grussu, Francesco Ianus, Andrada Hansen, Brian Howard, Amy F.D. Barrett, Rachel L.C. Aggarwal, Manisha Michielse, Stijn Nasrallah, Fatima Syeda, Warda Wang, Nian Veraart, Jelle Roebroeck, Alard Bagdasarian, Andrew F. Eichner, Cornelius Sepehrband, Farshid Zimmermann, Jan Soustelle, Lucas Bowman, Christien Tendler, Benjamin C. Hertanu, Andreea Jeurissen, Ben Verhoye, Marleen Frydman, Lucio de Looij, Yohan van Hike, David Dunn, Jeff F. Miller, Karla Landman, Bennett A. Shemesh, Noam Anderson, Adam McKinnon, Emilie Farquharson, Shawna Acqua, Flavio Dell Pierpaoli, Carlo Drobnjak, Ivana Leemans, Alexander Harkins, Kevin D. Descoteaux, Maxime Xu, Duan Huang, Hao Santin, Mathieu D. Grant, Samuel C. Obenaus, Andre Kim, Gene S. Wu, Dan Le Bihan, Denis Blackband, Stephen J. Ciobanu, Luisa Fieremans, Els Bai, Ruiliang Leergaard, Trygve B. Zhang, Jiangyang Dyrby, Tim B. Allan Johnson, G. Cohen-Adad, Julien Budde, Matthew D. Jelescu, Ileana O. Radiology and Radiological Sciences Vanderbilt University Medical Center NashvilleTN United States Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science Vanderbilt University NashvilleTN United States Radiomics Group Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus Barcelona Spain Queen Square MS Centre Queen Square Institute of Neurology Faculty of Brain Sciences University College London London United Kingdom Champalimaud Research Champalimaud Foundation Lisbon Portugal Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark Department of Bioengineering Imperial College London London United Kingdom FMRIB Centre Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom Department of Neuroimaging Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London United Kingdom NatBrainLab Department of Forensics and Neurodevelopmental Sciences Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London United Kingdom Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine BaltimoreMD United States Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht Netherlands The Queensland Brain Institute The University of Queensland Queensland Australia Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre The University of Melbourne ParkvilleVIC Australia Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences Indiana University IN United States Stark Neurosciences Research Institute Indiana University School of Medicine IN United States Center for Biomedical Imaging NYU Grossman School of Medicine New YorkNY United States Faculty of psychology and Neuroscience Maastricht University Maastricht Netherlands Department of Chemical & Biomedical Engineering FAMU-FSU College of Engineering Florida State University TallahasseeFL United States Center for Interdisciplinary Magnetic Re

The value of preclinical diffusion MRI (dMRI) is substantial. While dMRI enables in vivo non-invasive characterization of tissue, ex vivo dMRI is increasingly being used to probe tissue microstructure and brain connectivity. Ex vivo dMRI has several experimental advantages including higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and spatial resolution compared to in vivo studies, and enabling more advanced diffusion contrasts for improved microstructure and connectivity characterization. Another major advantage of ex vivo dMRI is the direct comparison with histological data, as a crucial methodological validation. However, there are a number of considerations that must be made when performing ex vivo experiments. The steps from tissue preparation, image acquisition and processing, and interpretation of results are complex, with many decisions that not only differ dramatically from in vivo imaging of small animals, but ultimately affect what questions can be answered using the data. This work represents "Part 2" of a 3-part series of recommendations and considerations for preclinical dMRI. We describe best practices for dMRI of ex vivo tissue, with a focus on the value that ex vivo imaging adds to the field of dMRI and considerations in ex vivo image acquisition. We first give general considerations and foundational knowledge that must be considered when designing experiments. We briefly describe differences in specimens and models and discuss why some may be more or less appropriate for different studies. We then give guidelines for ex vivo protocols, including tissue fixation, sample preparation, and MR scanning. In each section, we attempt to provide guidelines and recommendations, but also highlight areas for which no guidelines exist (and why), and where future work should lie. An overarching goal herein is to enhance the rigor and reproducibility of ex vivo dMRI acquisitions and analyses, and thereby advance biomedical knowledge. © 2022, CC BY.

关键词： Image acquisition

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

From FAIR to CURE: Guidelines for Computational Models of Biological Systems

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2025年

作者： Sauro, Herbert M. Agmon, Eran Blinov, Michael L. Gennari, John H. Hellerstein, Joe Heydarabadipour, Adel Hunter, Peter Jardine, Bartholomew E. May, Elebeoba Nickerson, David P. Smith, Lucian P. Bader, Gary D. Bergmann, Frank Boyle, Patrick M. Dräger, Andreas Faeder, James R. Feng, Song Freire, Juliana Fröhlich, Fabian Glazier, James A. Gorochowski, Thomas E. Helikar, Tomas Hoops, Stefan Imoukhuede, Princess Keating, Sarah M. Konig, Matthias Laubenbacher, Reinhard Loew, Leslie M. Lopez, Carlos F. Lytton, William W. McCulloch, Andrew Mendes, Pedro Myers, Chris J. Myers, Jerry G. Mulugeta, Lealem Niarakis, Anna van Niekerk, David D. Olivier, Brett G. Patrie, Alexander A. Quardokus, Ellen M. Radde, Nicole Rohwer, Johann M. Sahle, Sven Schaff, James C. Sego, T.J. Shin, Janis Snoep, Jacky L. Vadigepalli, Rajanikanth Wiley, H. Steve Waltemath, Dagmar Moraru, Ion Department of Bioengineering University of Washington SeattleWA98195-5061 United States Intelligent Systems Engineering and Biocomplexity Institute Indiana University Street BloomingtonIN47408 United States Center for Cardiovascular Biology University of Washington SeattleWA98195-5061 United States eScience Institute University of Washington SeattleWA98195-5061 United States Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine University of Washington SeattleWA98195-5061 United States School of Biological Sciences University of Bristol 24 Tyndall Avenue BristolBS8 1TQ United Kingdom Departments of Physiology & Pharmacology Neurology Downstate Health Science University BrooklynNY11203 United States Department of Neurology Kings County Hospital BrooklynNY11203 United States NASA-John H. Glenn Research Center MS 110-3 21000 Brookpark Road ClevelandOH44135 United States Center for Cell Analysis and Modeling UConn Health 263 Farmington Avenue FarmingtonCT06030-6406 United States Amsterdam Institute for Life and Environment Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam De Boelelaan 1108 Amsterdam1081 HZ Netherlands Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine Thomas Jefferson University 1020 Locust St PhiladelphiaPA19107 United States Biological Sciences Division Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 902 Battelle Blvd RichlandWA99354 United States Auckland Bioengineering Institute University of Auckland Auckland1010 New Zealand Center of Integrative Biology University of Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier 165 Rue Marianne Grunberg-Manago Toulouse31400 France Lifeware Group Inria Building Alan Turing 1 Rue Honoré d’Estienne d’Orves Palaiseau91120 France Multiscale Modeling Group Altos Labs Redwood CityCA94065 United States partner site Tübingen Tübingen Germany Ottfried-Müller-Str. 37 Tübingen72076 Germany 06120 Germany Department of Computer Science Center for Data Science New York University New YorkNY11201 United States Department of Bi

Guidelines for managing scientific data have been established under the FAIR principles requiring that data be Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable. In many scientific disciplines, especially computational biology, both data and models are key to progress. For this reason, and recognizing that such models are a very special type of "data", we argue that computational models, especially mechanistic models prevalent in medicine, physiology and systems biology, deserve a complementary set of guidelines. We propose the CURE principles, emphasizing that models should be Credible, Understandable, Reproducible, and Extensible. We delve into each principle, discussing verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification for model credibility;the clarity of model descriptions and annotations for understandability;adherence to standards and open science practices for reproducibility;and the use of open standards and modular code for extensibility and reuse. We outline recommended and baseline requirements for each aspect of CURE, aiming to enhance the impact and trustworthiness of computational models, particularly in biomedical applications where credibility is paramount. Our perspective underscores the need for a more disciplined approach to modeling, aligning with emerging trends such as Digital Twins and emphasizing the importance of data and modeling standards for interoperability and reuse. Finally, we emphasize that given the non-trivial effort required to implement the guidelines, the community moves to automate as many of the guidelines as possible. © 2025, CC BY.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Genomic basis for RNA alterations in cancer (vol 578, pg 129, 2020)

引用

NATURE 2023年第7948期614卷 E37-E37页

作者： Calabrese, Claudia Davidson, Natalie R. Demircioglu, Deniz Fonseca, Nuno A. He, Yao Lehmann, Kjong-Van Liu, Fenglin Shiraishi, Yuichi Soulette, Cameron M. Urban, Lara Greger, Liliana Li, Siliang Liu, Dongbing Perry, Marc D. Xiang, Qian Zhang, Fan Zhang, Junjun Bailey, Peter Erkek, Serap Hoadley, Katherine A. Hou, Yong Huska, Matthew R. Kilpinen, Helena Korbel, Jan O. Marin, Maximillian G. Markowski, Julia Nandi, Tannistha Pan-Hammarstrom, Qiang Pedamallu, Chandra Sekhar Siebert, Reiner Stark, Stefan G. Su, Hong Tan, Patrick Waszak, Sebastian M. Yung, Christina Zhu, Shida Awadalla, Philip Creighton, Chad J. Meyerson, Matthew Ouellette, B. F. Francis Wu, Kui Yang, Huanming Brazma, Alvis Brooks, Angela N. Goke, Jonathan Ratsch, Gunnar Schwarz, Roland F. Stegle, Oliver Zhang, Zemin European Molecular Biology Laboratory European Bioinformatics Institute Hinxton UK European Molecular Biology Laboratory European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI) Cambridge UK Genome Biology Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) Heidelberg Germany CIBIO/InBIO - Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources Universidade do Porto Vairão Portugal Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology Max Delbruck Center for Molecular Medicine Berlin Germany German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Berlin Germany German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine Berlin Germany German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner site Berlin Berlin Germany European Molecular Biology Laboratory Genome Biology Unit Heidelberg Germany Division of Computational Genomics and Systems Genetics German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics Lausanne Switzerland University Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland Computational Biology Center Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA Department of Biology ETH Zurich Zürich Switzerland Department of Computer Science ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland Korea University Seoul South Korea Computational and Systems Biology Program Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA Department of Physiology and Biophysics Weill Cornell Medicine New York NY USA Institute for Computational Biomedicine Weill Cornell Medicine New York NY USA Controlled Department and Institution New York NY USA Englander Institute for Precision Medicine Weill Cornell Medicine New York NY USA National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore Genome Institute of Singapore Singapore Singapore Computational and Systems Biology Genome Institute of Singap

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Considerations and Recommendations from the ISMRM Diffusion Study group for preclinical diffusion MRI: Part 1 — In vivo small-animal imaging

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2022年

作者： Jelescu, Ileana O. Grussu, Francesco Ianus, Andrada Hansen, Brian Barrett, Rachel L.C. Aggarwal, Manisha Michielse, Stijn Nasrallah, Fatima Syeda, Warda Wang, Nian Veraart, Jelle Roebroeck, Alard Bagdasarian, Andrew F. Eichner, Cornelius Sepehrband, Farshid Zimmermann, Jan Soustelle, Lucas Bowman, Christien Tendler, Benjamin C. Hertanu, Andreea Jeurissen, Ben Verhoye, Marleen Frydman, Lucio de Looij, Yohan van Hike, David Dunn, Jeff F. Miller, Karla Landman, Bennett A. Shemesh, Noam Anderson, Adam McKinnon, Emilie Farquharson, Shawna Acqua, Flavio Dell Pierpaoli, Carlo Drobnjak, Ivana Leemans, Alexander Harkins, Kevin D. Descoteaux, Maxime Xu, Duan Huang, Hao Santin, Mathieu D. Grant, Samuel C. Obenaus, Andre Kim, Gene S. Wu, Dan Le Bihan, Denis Blackband, Stephen J. Ciobanu, Luisa Fieremans, Els Bai, Ruiliang Leergaard, Trygve B. Zhang, Jiangyang Dyrby, Tim B. Johnson, G. Allan Cohen-Adad, Julien Budde, Matthew D. Schilling, Kurt G. Department of Radiology Lausanne University Hospital University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland Radiomics Group Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus Barcelona Spain Queen Square MS Centre Queen Square Institute of Neurology Faculty of Brain Sciences University College London London United Kingdom Champalimaud Research Champalimaud Foundation Lisbon Portugal Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark Department of Neuroimaging Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London United Kingdom NatBrainLab Department of Forensics and Neurodevelopmental Sciences Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London United Kingdom Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine BaltimoreMD United States Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht Netherlands The Queensland Brain Institute The University of Queensland Queensland Australia Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre The University of Melbourne ParkvilleVIC Australia Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences Indiana University IN United States Stark Neurosciences Research Institute Indiana University School of Medicine IN United States Center for Biomedical Imaging NYU Grossman School of Medicine New YorkNY United States Faculty of psychology and Neuroscience Maastricht University Maastricht Netherlands Department of Chemical & Biomedical Engineering FAMU-FSU College of Engineering Florida State University TallahasseeFL United States Center for Interdisciplinary Magnetic Resonance National HIgh Magnetic Field Laboratory TallahasseeFL United States Department of Neuropsychology Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig Germany USC Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Instit

Small-animal diffusion MRI (dMRI) has been used for methodological development and validation, characterizing the biological basis of diffusion phenomena, and comparative anatomy. The steps from animal setup and monitoring, to acquisition, analysis, and interpretation are complex, with many decisions that may ultimately affect what questions can be answered using the resultant data. This work aims to present selected recommendations and guidelines from the diffusion community, on best practices for preclinical dMRI of in vivo animals. We describe the general considerations and foundational knowledge that must be considered when designing experiments. We briefly describe differences in animal species and disease models and discuss why some may be more or less appropriate for different studies. We then give guidelines for in vivo acquisition protocols, including decisions on hardware, animal preparation, and imaging sequences, followed by advice for data processing including pre-processing, model-fitting, and tractography. Finally, we provide an online resource which lists publicly available preclinical dMRI datasets and software packages, to promote responsible and reproducible research. In each section, we attempt to provide guides and recommendations, but also highlight areas for which no guidelines exist (and why), and where future work should focus. While we mainly cover the central nervous system (on which most preclinical dMRI studies are focused), we also provide, where possible and applicable, recommendations for other organs of interest. An overarching goal herein is to enhance the rigor and reproducibility of small animal dMRI acquisitions and analyses, and thereby advance biomedical knowledge. © 2022, CC BY-NC-ND.

关键词： Invertebrates

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：