检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

37th International Cosmic Ray Conference, ICRC 2021

作者： Seglar-Arroyo, M. Sanchez, D. Esteban Gutierrez, A. Agudo, I. Ciprini, S. Filippenko, A.V. Hovatta, T. Jermak, H. Kopatskaya, E.N. Lähteenmäki, A. Larionov, V.M. Larionova, L.V. Morozova, D.A. Pahljina, M. Tornikoski, M. Troitsky, I. Verrecchia, F. Xiao, H.B. Zheng, W. Acciari, V.A. Ansoldi, S. Antonelli, L.A. Arbet Engels, A. Artero, M. Asano, K. Baack, D. Babić, A. Baquero, A. Barres de Almeida, U. Barrio, J.A. Batković, I. Becerra González, J. Bednarek, W. Bellizzi, L. Bernardini, E. Bernardos, M. Berti, A. Besenrieder, J. Bhattacharyya, W. Bigongiari, C. Biland, A. Blanch, O. Bökenkamp, H. Bonnoli, G. Bošnjak, Ž. Busetto, G. Carosi, R. Ceribella, G. Cerruti, M. Chai, Y. Chilingarian, A. Cikota, S. Colak, S.M. Colombo, E. Contreras, J.L. Cortina, J. Covino, S. D'Amico, G. D'Elia, V. Da Vela, P. Dazzi, F. De Angelis, A. De Lotto, B. Delfino, M. Delgado, J. Delgado Mendez, C. Depaoli, D. Di Pierro, F. Di Venere, L. Do Souto Espiñeira, E. Dominis Prester, D. Donini, A. Dorner, D. Doro, M. Elsaesser, D. Fallah Ramazani, V. Fattorini, A. Fonseca, M.V. Font, L. Fruck, C. Fukami, S. Fukazawa, Y. García López, R.J. Garczarczyk, M. Gasparyan, S. Gaug, M. Giglietto, N. Giordano, F. Gliwny, P. Godinović, N. Green, J.G. Green, D. Hadasch, D. Hahn, A. Heckmann, L. Herrera, J. Hoang, J. Hrupec, D. Hütten, M. Inada, T. Ishio, K. Iwamura, Y. Jiménez Martínez, I. Jormanainen, J. Jouvin, L. Karjalainen, M. Kerszberg, D. Kobayashi, Y. Kubo, H. Kushida, J. Lamastra, A. Lelas, D. Leone, F. Lindfors, E. Linhoff, L. Lombardi, S. Longo, F. López-Coto, R. López-Moya, M. López-Oramas, A. Loporchio, S. Machado de Oliveira Fraga, B. Maggio, C. Majumdar, P. Makariev, M. Mallamaci, M. Maneva, G. Manganaro, M. Mannheim, K. Maraschi, L. Mariotti, M. Martínez, M. Mazin, D. Menchiari, S. Mender, S. Mićanović, S. Miceli, D. Miener, T. Miranda, J.M. Mirzoyan, R. Molina, E. Moralejo, A. Morcuende, D. Moreno, V. Moretti, E. Nakamori, T. Nava, L. Neustroev, V. University of Rijeka Department of Physics Radmile Matejčić 2 Rijeka Croatia IRFU CEA Université Paris-Saclay Gif-sur-YvetteF-91191 France CNRS LAPP France CSIC Granada Spain Roma Tor Vergata Section RomeI-00133 Italy ASI Space Science Data Center RomeI-00133 Italy Department of Astronomy University of California BerkeleyCA94720-3411 United States Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science University of California BerkeleyCA94720 United States Aalto University Tuorla observatory Finland Liverpool John Moores University United Kingdom St. Petersburg State University Russia Aalto University Finland INAF Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma via Frascati 33 Monte Porzio CatoneI-00078 Italy Guangzhou University China Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias Dpto. de Astrofísica Universidad de La Laguna Tenerife La LagunaE-38200 Spain Università di Udine INFN Trieste UdineI-33100 Italy RomeI-00136 Italy ETH Zürich ZürichCH-8093 Switzerland E-08193 Spain The University of Tokyo Chiba Kashiwa277-8582 Japan Technische Universität Dortmund DortmundD-44221 Germany Zagreb10000 Croatia IPARCOS Institute EMFTEL Department Universidad Complutense de Madrid MadridE-28040 Spain URCA RJ Rio de Janeiro22290-180 Brazil Università di Padova INFN PadovaI-35131 Italy University of Lodz Faculty of Physics and Applied Informatics Department of Astrophysics Lodz90-236 Poland Università di Siena INFN Pisa SienaI-53100 Italy ZeuthenD-15738 Germany Max-Planck-Institut für Physik MünchenD-80805 Germany Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía-CSIC Glorieta de la Astronomía s/n Granada18008 Spain Università di Pisa INFN Pisa PisaI-56126 Italy Universitat de Barcelona ICCUB IEEC-UB BarcelonaE-08028 Spain Armenian MAGIC Group A. Alikhanyan National Science Laboratory Yerevan0036 Armenia Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas Medioambientales y Tecnológicas MadridE-28040 Spain INFN MAGIC Group INFN Sezione di Torino Università d

OT 081 is a luminous blazar well known for its variability in many energy bands. The very-high-energy (VHE;E > 100 GeV) gamma-ray emission from the source was discovered by MAGIC and H.E.S.S. during flaring activity in July 2016, after a trigger from the Large Area Telescope (LAT) onboard the Fermi satellite. By analysing the multiwavelength light curves and the broadband spectral energy distribution (SED), we study the activity of the source and investigate four individual states of activity in the window from MJD 57575 to 57602. The intrinsic gamma-ray spectrum can be described by a power law with spectral indices of 3.27 ± 0.44 (MAGIC) and 3.39 ± 0.58 (H.E.S.S.) over energy ranges 60-300 GeV and 120-500 GeV, respectively. The combined contemporaneous high-energy (HE;E > 100 MeV) through VHE SED shows curvature and can be described by a log-parabola shape. A simple one-zone synchrotron self-Compton (SSC) model is not sufficient to describe the broadband SED. The presence of broad emission lines in the optical spectrum of the source challenges the categorisation of OT 081 as a BL Lac and, together with the emission scenarios tested, points to the possibility that the source is transitional in nature between a BL Lac and a flat-spectrum radio quasar. © Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons.

关键词： Germanium alloys

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Multimuons in cosmic-ray events as seen in ALICE at the LHC

引用

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2025年第4期2025卷 009-009页

作者： Acharya, S. Agarwal, A. Aglieri Rinella, G. Aglietta, L. Agnello, M. Agrawal, N. Ahammed, Z. Ahmad, S. Ahn, S.U. Ahuja, I. Akindinov, A. Akishina, V. Al-Turany, M. Aleksandrov, D. Alessandro, B. Alfanda, H.M. Alfaro Molina, R. Ali, B. Alici, A. Alizadehvandchali, N. Alkin, A. Alme, J. Alocco, G. Alt, T. Altamura, A.R. Altsybeev, I. Alvarado, J.R. Alvarez, C.O.R. Anaam, M.N. Andrei, C. Andreou, N. Andronic, A. Andronov, E. Anguelov, V. Antinori, F. Antonioli, P. Apadula, N. Aphecetche, L. Appelshäuser, H. Arata, C. Arcelli, S. Arnaldi, R. Arneiro, J.G.M.C.A. Arsene, I.C. Arslandok, M. Augustinus, A. Averbeck, R. Averyanov, D. Azmi, M.D. Baba, H. Badalà, A. Bae, J. Bae, Y. Baek, Y.W. Bai, X. Bailhache, R. Bailung, Y. Bala, R. Balbino, A. Baldisseri, A. Balis, B. Banoo, Z. Barbasova, V. Barile, F. Barioglio, L. Barlou, M. Barman, B. Barnaföldi, G.G. Barnby, L.S. Barreau, E. Barret, V. Barreto, L. Bartels, C. Barth, K. Bartsch, E. Bastid, N. Basu, S. Batigne, G. Battistini, D. Batyunya, B. Bauri, D. Bazo Alba, J.L. Bearden, I.G. Beattie, C. Becht, P. Behera, D. Belikov, I. Bell Hechavarria, A.D.C. Bellini, F. Bellwied, R. Belokurova, S. Beltran, L.G.E. Beltran, Y.A.V. Bencedi, G. Bensaoula, A. Beole, S. Berdnikov, Y. Berdnikova, A. Bergmann, L. Besoiu, M.G. Betev, L. Bhaduri, P.P. Bhasin, A. Bhattacharjee, B. Bianchi, L. Bielčík, J. Bielčíková, J. Bigot, A.P. Bilandzic, A. Biro, G. Biswas, S. Bize, N. Blair, J.T. Blau, D. Blidaru, M.B. Bluhme, N. Blume, C. Bock, F. Bodova, T. Bok, J. Boldizsár, L. Bombara, M. Bond, P.M. Bonomi, G. Borel, H. Borissov, A. Borquez Carcamo, A.G. Botta, E. Bouziani, Y.E.M. Bratrud, L. Braun-Munzinger, P. Bregant, M. Broz, M. Bruno, G.E. Buchakchiev, V.D. Buckland, M.D. Budnikov, D. Buesching, H. Bufalino, S. Buhler, P. Burmasov, N. Buthelezi, Z. Bylinkin, A. Bysiak, S.A. Cabanillas Noris, J.C. Cabrera, M.F.T. Caines, H. Caliva, A. Calvo Villar, E. Camacho, J.M.M. Camerini, P. Canedo, F.D.M. Cantway, S.L. Carabas, M. Carballo, A.A. Carnesecchi, F. Caron, R. Carvalho, L.A.D. Castillo Castel A.I. Alikhanyan National Science Laboratory (Yerevan Physics Institute) Foundation Yerevan Armenia AGH University of Krakow Cracow Poland Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Kiev Ukraine Bose Institute Department of Physics Centre for Astroparticle Physics and Space Science (CAPSS) Kolkata India California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo CA United States Central China Normal University Wuhan China Centro de Aplicaciones Tecnológicas y Desarrollo Nuclear (CEADEN) Havana Cuba Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados (CINVESTAV) Mérida Mexico City Mexico Chicago State University Chicago IL United States China Institute of Atomic Energy Beijing China China University of Geosciences Wuhan China Chungbuk National University Cheongju South Korea Comenius University Bratislava Faculty of Mathematics Physics and Informatics Bratislava Slovakia Creighton University Omaha NE United States Department of Physics Aligarh Muslim University Aligarh India Department of Physics Pusan National University Pusan South Korea Department of Physics Sejong University Seoul South Korea Department of Physics University of California Berkeley CA United States Department of Physics University of Oslo Oslo Norway Department of Physics and Technology University of Bergen Bergen Norway Dipartimento di Fisica Università di Pavia Pavia Italy Dipartimento di Fisica dell’Università Sezione INFN Cagliari Italy Dipartimento di Fisica dell’Università Sezione INFN Trieste Italy Dipartimento di Fisica dell’Università Sezione INFN Turin Italy Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia dell’Università Sezione INFN Bologna Italy Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia dell’Università Sezione INFN Catania Italy Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia dell’Università Sezione INFN Padova Italy Dipartimento di Fisica ‘E.R. Caianiello’ dell’Università Gruppo Collegato INFN Salerno Italy Dipartimento DISAT del Politecnico Sezione

ALICE is a large experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Located 52 meters underground, its detectors are suitable to measure muons produced by cosmic-ray interactions in the atmosphere. In this paper, the studies of the cosmic muons registered by ALICE during Run 2 (2015–2018) are described. The analysis is limited to multimuon events defined as events with more than four detected muons (N_µ > 4) and in the zenith angle range 0^◦ < θ < 50^◦. The results are compared with Monte Carlo simulations using three of the main hadronic interaction models describing the air shower development in the atmosphere: QGSJET-II-04, EPOS-LHC, and SIBYLL 2.3d. The interval of the primary cosmic-ray energy involved in the measured muon multiplicity distribution is about 4×10¹⁵ < E_prim < 6×10¹⁶ eV. In this interval none of the three models is able to describe precisely the trend of the composition of cosmic rays as the energy increases. However, QGSJET-II-04 is found to be the only model capable of reproducing reasonably well the muon multiplicity distribution, assuming a heavy composition of the primary cosmic rays over the whole energy range, while SIBYLL 2.3d and EPOS-LHC underpredict the number of muons in a large interval of multiplicity by more than 20% and 30%, respectively. The rate of high muon multiplicity events (N_µ > 100) obtained with QGSJET-II-04 and SIBYLL 2.3d is compatible with the data, while EPOS-LHC produces a significantly lower rate (55% of the measured rate). For both QGSJET-II-04 and SIBYLL 2.3d, the rate is close to the data when the composition is assumed to be dominated by heavy elements, an outcome compatible with the average energy E_prim ∼ 10¹⁷ eV of these events. This result places significant constraints on more exotic production mechanisms. © 2025 The Author(s).

关键词： cosmic ray experiments cosmic rays detectors

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Proton emission in ultraperipheral Pb-Pb collisions at sNN=5.02 TeV

引用

Physical Review C 2025年第5期111卷 054906-054906页

作者： S. Acharya A. Agarwal G. Aglieri Rinella L. Aglietta M. Agnello N. Agrawal Z. Ahammed S. Ahmad S. U. Ahn I. Ahuja A. Akindinov V. Akishina M. Al-Turany D. Aleksandrov B. Alessandro H. M. Alfanda R. Alfaro Molina B. Ali A. Alici N. Alizadehvandchali A. Alkin J. Alme G. Alocco T. Alt A. R. Altamura I. Altsybeev J. R. Alvarado C. O. R. Alvarez M. N. Anaam C. Andrei N. Andreou A. Andronic E. Andronov V. Anguelov F. Antinori P. Antonioli N. Apadula L. Aphecetche H. Appelshäuser C. Arata S. Arcelli R. Arnaldi J. G. M. C. A. Arneiro I. C. Arsene M. Arslandok A. Augustinus R. Averbeck D. Averyanov M. D. Azmi H. Baba A. Badalà J. Bae Y. Bae Y. W. Baek X. Bai R. Bailhache Y. Bailung R. Bala A. Baldisseri B. Balis Z. Banoo V. Barbasova F. Barile L. Barioglio M. Barlou B. Barman G. G. Barnaföldi L. S. Barnby E. Barreau V. Barret L. Barreto C. Bartels K. Barth E. Bartsch N. Bastid S. Basu G. Batigne D. Battistini B. Batyunya D. Bauri J. L. Bazo Alba I. G. Bearden C. Beattie P. Becht D. Behera I. Belikov A. D. C. Bell Hechavarria F. Bellini R. Bellwied S. Belokurova L. G. E. Beltran Y. A. V. Beltran G. Bencedi A. Bensaoula S. Beole Y. Berdnikov A. Berdnikova L. Bergmann M. G. Besoiu L. Betev P. P. Bhaduri A. Bhasin B. Bhattacharjee L. Bianchi J. Bielčík J. Bielčíková A. P. Bigot A. Bilandzic A. Binoy G. Biro S. Biswas N. Bize J. T. Blair D. Blau M. B. Blidaru N. Bluhme C. Blume F. Bock T. Bodova J. Bok L. Boldizsár M. Bombara P. M. Bond G. Bonomi H. Borel A. Borissov A. G. Borquez Carcamo E. Botta Y. E. M. Bouziani D. C. Brandibur L. Bratrud P. Braun-Munzinger M. Bregant M. Broz G. E. Bruno V. D. Buchakchiev M. D. Buckland D. Budnikov H. Buesching S. Bufalino P. Buhler N. Burmasov Z. Buthelezi A. Bylinkin S. A. Bysiak J. C. Cabanillas Noris M. F. T. Cabrera H. Caines A. Caliva E. Calvo Villar J. M. M. Camacho P. Camerini F. D. M. Canedo S. L. Cantway M. Carabas A. A. Carballo F. Carnesecchi R. Caron L. A. D. Carvalho J. Castillo Castellanos M. Castoldi F. Catalano S. Cattaruzzi R. Cerri I. Chakaberia P. Chakraborty S. Chandra Université Clermont Auvergne CNRS/IN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre Homi Bhabha National Institute Kolkata India European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland Dipartimento di Fisica dell'Università and Sezione INFN Turin Italy Dipartimento DISAT del Politecnico and Sezione INFN Turin Italy Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia dell'Università and Sezione INFN Bologna Italy Department of Physics Aligarh Muslim University Aligarh India Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information Daejeon Republic of Korea Faculty of Science P.J. Šafárik University Košice Slovak Republic Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Frankfurt Germany Research Division and ExtreMe Matter Institute EMMI GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH Darmstadt Germany INFN Sezione di Torino Turin Italy Central China Normal University Wuhan China Instituto de Física Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Mexico City Mexico University of Houston Houston Texas USA Sungkyunkwan University Suwon City Republic of Korea Department of Physics and Technology University of Bergen Bergen Norway INFN Sezione di Cagliari Cagliari Italy Institut für Kernphysik Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Frankfurt Germany INFN Sezione di Bari Bari Italy Physik Department Technische Universität München Munich Germany High Energy Physics Group Universidad Autónoma de Puebla Puebla Mexico Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering Bucharest Romania University of Derby Derby United Kingdom Universität Münster Institut für Kernphysik Münster Germany Physikalisches Institut Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany INFN Sezione di Padova Padova Italy INFN Sezione di Bologna Bologna Italy Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley California USA SUBATECH I

The first measurements of proton emission accompanied by neutron emission in the electromagnetic dissociation (EMD) of Pb208 nuclei in the ALICE experiment at the Large Hadron Collider are presented. The EMD protons and neutrons emitted at very forward rapidities are detected by the proton and neutron zero degree calorimeters of the ALICE experiment. The emission cross sections of zero, one, two, and three protons accompanied by at least one neutron were measured in ultraperipheral Pb208−Pb208 collisions at a center-of-mass energy per nucleon pair sNN=5.02TeV. The 0p and 3p cross sections are described by the RELDIS model within their measurement uncertainties, while the 1p and 2p cross sections are underestimated by the model by 17–25%. According to this model, these 0p, 1p, 2p, and 3p cross sections are associated, respectively, with the production of various isotopes of Pb, Tl, Hg, and Au in the EMD of Pb208. The cross sections of the emission of a single proton accompanied by the emission of one, two, or three neutrons in EMD were also measured. The data are significantly overestimated by the RELDIS model, which predicts that the (1p,1n), (1p,2n), and (1p,3n) cross sections are very similar to the cross sections for the production of the thallium isotopes Tl206,205,204.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Why is the Winner the Best?

Why is the Winner the Best?

引用

Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

作者： M. Eisenmann A. Reinke V. Weru M. D. Tizabi F. Isensee T. J. Adler S. Ali V. Andrearczyk M. Aubreville U. Baid S. Bakas N. Balu S. Bano J. Bernal S. Bodenstedt A. Casella V. Cheplygina M. Daum M. De Bruijne A. Depeursinge R. Dorent J. Egger D. G. Ellis S. Engelhardt M. Ganz N. Ghatwary G. Girard P. Godau A. Gupta L. Hansen K. Harada M. Heinrich N. Heller A. Hering A. Huaulmé P. Jannin A. E. Kavur O. Kodym M. Kozubek J. Li H. Li J. Ma C. Martín-Isla B. Menze A. Noble V. Oreiller N. Padoy S. Pati K. Payette T. Rädsch J. Rafael-Patiño V. Singh Bawa S. Speidel C. H. Sudre K. Van Wijnen M. Wagner D. Wei A. Yamlahi M. H. Yap C. Yuan M. Zenk A. Zia D. Zimmerer D. Aydogan B. Bhattarai L. Bloch R. Brüngel J. Cho C. Choi Q. Dou I. Ezhov C. M. Friedrich C. Fuller R. R. Gaire A. Galdran Á. García Faura M. Grammatikopoulou S. Hong M. Jahanifar I. Jang A. Kadkhodamohammadi I. Kang F. Kofler S. Kondo H. Kuijf M. Li M. Luu T. Martinčič P. Morais M. A. Naser B. Oliveira D. Owen S. Pang J. Park S. Park S. Płotka E. Puybareau N. Rajpoot K. Ryu N. Saeed A. Shephard P. Shi D. Štepec R. Subedi G. Tochon H. R. Torres H. Urien J. L. Vilaça K. A. Wahid H. Wang J. Wang L. Wang X. Wang B. Wiestler M. Wodzinski F. Xia J. Xie Z. Xiong S. Yang Y. Yang Z. Zhao K. Maier-Hein P. F. Jäger A. Kopp-Schneider L. Maier-Hein Division of Intelligent Medical Systems German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Helmholtz Imaging German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Division of Biostatistics German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Division of Medical Image Computing German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences School of Computing University of Leeds Leeds UK Institute of Informatics School of Management HES-SO Valais-Wallis University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland Sierre Switzerland Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Lausanne University Hospital Lausanne Switzerland Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt Ingolstadt Germany Center for Artificial Intelligence and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D) and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA) University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Radiology University of Washington Seattle WA USA Department of Computer Science Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS) University College London London UK Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona & Computer Vision Center Barcelona Spain Division of Translational Surgical Oncology National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC) Dresden Dresden Germany Department of Advanced Robotics Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia Italy Department of Electronics Information and Bioengineering Politecnico di Milano Milan Italy IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Department of General Visceral and Transplantation Surgery Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany Department of Radiology and Nuc

International benchmarking competitions have become fundamental for the comparative performance assessment of image analysis methods. However, little attention has been given to investigating what can be learnt from these competitions. Do they really generate scientific progress? What are common and successful participation strategies? What makes a solution superior to a competing method? To address this gap in the literature, we performed a multicenter study with all 80 competitions that were conducted in the scope of IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021. Statistical analyses performed based on comprehensive descriptions of the submitted algorithms linked to their rank as well as the underlying participation strategies revealed common characteristics of winning solutions. These typically include the use of multi-task learning (63%) and/or multi-stage pipelines (61%), and a focus on augmentation (100%), image preprocessing (97%), data curation (79%), and post-processing (66%). The “typical” lead of a winning team is a computer scientist with a doctoral degree, five years of experience in biomedical image analysis, and four years of experience in deep learning. Two core general development strategies stood out for highly-ranked teams: the reflection of the metrics in the method design and the focus on analyzing and handling failure cases. According to the organizers, 43% of the winning algorithms exceeded the state of the art but only 11% completely solved the respective domain problem. The insights of our study could help researchers (1) improve algorithm development strategies when approaching new problems, and (2) focus on open research questions revealed by this work.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

BraTS-Path Challenge: Assessing Heterogeneous Histopathologic Brain Tumor Sub-regions

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2024年

作者： Bakas, Spyridon Thakur, Siddhesh P. Faghani, Shahriar Moassefi, Mana Baid, Ujjwal Chung, Verena Pati, Sarthak Innani, Shubham Baheti, Bhakti Albrecht, Jake Karargyris, Alexandros Kassem, Hasan Nasrallah, MacLean P. Ahrendsen, Jared T. Barresi, Valeria Gubbiotti, Maria A. Lpez, Giselle Y. Lucas, Calixto-Hope G. Miller, Michael L. Cooper, Lee A.D. Huse, Jason T. Bell, William R. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine IndianapolisIN United States Department of Neurological Surgery Indiana University School of Medicine IndianapolisIN United States Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences Indiana University School of Medicine IndianapolisIN United States Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science Indiana University School of Medicine IndianapolisIN United States Department of Computer Science Luddy School of Informatics Computing and Engineering Indiana University IndianapolisIN United States Medical Research Group MLCommons San FranciscoCA United States Department of Radiology Mayo Clinic MN United States Sage Bionetworks United States Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Pathology Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University ChicagoIL United States Department of Diagnostics and Public Health University of Verona Verona Italy Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Department of Anatomical Pathology University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center TX United States The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke DurhamNC United States Department of Pathology Duke University School of Medicine DurhamNC United States Department of Neurosurgery Duke University Medical School DurhamNC United States Division of Neuropathology Department of Pathology Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine BaltimoreMD United States Department of Pathology and Cell Biology Columbia University Irving Medical Center New YorkNY United States Department of Translational Molecular Pathology University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center TX United States

Glioblastoma is the most common primary adult brain tumor, with a grim prognosis - median survival of 12-18 months following treatment, and 4 months otherwise. Glioblastoma is widely infiltrative in the cerebral hemispheres and well-defined by heterogeneous molecular and micro-environmental histopathologic profiles, which pose a major obstacle in treatment. Correctly diagnosing these tumors and assessing their heterogeneity is crucial for choosing the precise treatment and potentially enhancing patient survival rates. In the gold-standard histopathology-based approach to tumor diagnosis, detecting various morpho-pathological features of distinct histology throughout digitized tissue sections is crucial. Such "features" include the presence of cellular tumor, geographic necrosis, pseudopalisading necrosis, areas abundant in microvascular proliferation, infiltration into the cortex, wide extension in subcortical white matter, leptomeningeal infiltration, regions dense with macrophages, and the presence of perivascular or scattered lymphocytes. With these features in mind and building upon the main aim of the BraTS Cluster of Challenges https://***/brats2024, the goal of the BraTS-Path challenge is to provide a systematically prepared comprehensive dataset and a benchmarking environment to develop and fairly compare deep-learning models capable of identifying tumor sub-regions of distinct histologic profile. These models aim to further our understanding of the disease and assist in the diagnosis and grading of conditions in a consistent manner. © 2024, CC BY.

关键词： Tumors

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Search for high-mass resonances in a final state comprising a gluon and two hadronically decaying W bosons in proton-proton collisions at = 13 TeV

引用

Journal of High Energy Physics 2025年第2期2025卷 1-46页

作者： Hayrapetyan, A. Tumasyan, A. Adam, W. Andrejkovic, J. W. Benato, L. Bergauer, T. Chatterjee, S. Damanakis, K. Dragicevic, M. Hussain, P. S. Jeitler, M. Krammer, N. Li, A. Liko, D. Mikulec, I. Schieck, J. Schöfbeck, R. Schwarz, D. Sonawane, M. Waltenberger, W. Wulz, C.-E. Janssen, T. Van Laer, T. Van Mechelen, P. Breugelmans, N. D’Hondt, J. Dansana, S. De Moor, A. Delcourt, M. Heyen, F. Lowette, S. Makarenko, I. Müller, D. Tavernier, S. Tytgat, M. Van Onsem, G. P. Van Putte, S. Vannerom, D. Bilin, B. Clerbaux, B. Das, A. K. De Bruyn, I. De Lentdecker, G. Evard, H. Favart, L. Gianneios, P. Jaramillo, J. Khalilzadeh, A. Khan, F. A. Lee, K. Malara, A. Paredes, S. Shahzad, M. A. Thomas, L. Vanden Bemden, M. Vander Velde, C. Vanlaer, P. De Coen, M. Dobur, D. Gokbulut, G. Hong, Y. Knolle, J. Lambrecht, L. Marckx, D. Mota Amarilo, K. Skovpen, K. Van Den Bossche, N. van der Linden, J. Wezenbeek, L. Benecke, A. Bethani, A. Bruno, G. Caputo, C. De Favereau De Jeneret, J. Delaere, C. Donertas, I. S. Giammanco, A. Guzel, A. O. Jain, Sa. Lemaitre, V. Lidrych, J. Mastrapasqua, P. Tran, T. T. Alves, G. A. Coelho, E. Correia Silva, G. Hensel, C. Menezes De Oliveira, T. Mora Herrera, C. Rebello Teles, P. Soeiro, M. Vilela Pereira, A. Aldá Júnior, W. L. Barroso Ferreira Filho, M. Brandao Malbouisson, H. Carvalho, W. Chinellato, J. Da Costa, E. M. Da Silveira, G. G. De Jesus Damiao, D. Fonseca De Souza, S. Gomes De Souza, R. Laux Kuhn, T. Macedo, M. Martins, J. Mundim, L. Nogima, H. Pinheiro, J. P. Santoro, A. Sznajder, A. Thiel, M. Bernardes, C. A. Calligaris, L. Fernandez Perez Tomei, T. R. Gregores, E. M. Maietto Silverio, I. Mercadante, P. G. Novaes, S. F. Orzari, B. Padula, Sandra S. Aleksandrov, A. Antchev, G. Hadjiiska, R. Iaydjiev, P. Misheva, M. Shopova, M. Sultanov, G. Dimitrov, A. Litov, L. Pavlov, B. Petkov, P. Petrov, A. Shumka, E. Keshri, S. Laroze, D. Thakur, S. Cheng, T. Javaid, T. Yuan, L. Hu, Z. Liang, Z. Liu, J. Chen, G. M. Chen, H. S. Chen, M. Iemmi, F. Jiang, C. H. Kapoor, A. Liao, H. Liu, Z.-A. Sharma, R. Song, Yerevan Physics Institute Yerevan Armenia Yerevan State University Yerevan Armenia Institut für Hochenergiephysik Vienna Austria TU Wien Vienna Austria Universiteit Antwerpen Antwerpen Belgium Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussel Belgium Ghent University Ghent Belgium Université Libre de Bruxelles Bruxelles Belgium Université Catholique de Louvain Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade Estadual de Campinas Campinas Brazil Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre Brazil Universidade Estadual Paulista Universidade Federal do ABC São Paulo Brazil Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Sofia Bulgaria University of Sofia Sofia Bulgaria Instituto De Alta Investigación Universidad de Tarapacá Arica Chile Beihang University Beijing China Department of Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China China Center of Advanced Science and Technology Beijing China China Spallation Neutron Source Guangdong China State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology Peking University Beijing China Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Science and Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory of Quantum Matter South China Normal University Guangzhou China Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou China University of Science and Technology of China Hefei China Nanjing Normal University Nanjing China Henan Normal University Xinxiang China University of Shanghai for Science and Technology Shanghai China The University of Iowa Iowa City U.S.A. Institute of Modern Physics and Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-beam Application (MOE) — Fudan University Shanghai China Zhejiang University Hangzhou China Universidad de Los Andes Bogota Colombia Universidad de Antioquia Medellin Colombia University

A search for high-mass resonances decaying into a gluon, g, and two W bosons is presented. A Kaluza-Klein gluon, gKK, decaying in cascade via a scalar radion R, gKK → gR → gWW, is considered. The final state studied consists of three large-radius jets, two of which contain the products of hadronically decaying W bosons, and the third one the hadronization products of the gluon. The analysis is performed using proton-proton collision data at $$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 13 TeV collected by the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC during 2016–2018, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb−1. The masses of the gKK and R candidates are reconstructed as trijet and dijet masses, respectively. These are used for event categorization and signal extraction. No excess of data events above the standard model background expectation is observed. Upper limits are set on the product of the gKK production cross section and its branching fraction via a radion R to gWW. This is the first analysis examining the resonant WW+jet signature and setting limits on the two resonance masses in an extended warped extra-dimensional model.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Measurements of the Higgs boson production cross section in the four-lepton final state in proton-proton collisions at = 13.6 TeV

引用

Journal of High Energy Physics 2025年第5期2025卷 1-46页

作者： Chekhovsky, V. Hayrapetyan, A. Makarenko, V. Tumasyan, A. Adam, W. Andrejkovic, J. W. Benato, L. Bergauer, T. Chatterjee, S. Damanakis, K. Dragicevic, M. Hussain, P. S. Jeitler, M. Krammer, N. Li, A. Liko, D. Mikulec, I. Schieck, J. Schöfbeck, R. Schwarz, D. Sonawane, M. Waltenberger, W. Wulz, C.-E. Janssen, T. Kwon, H. Van Laer, T. Van Mechelen, P. Breugelmans, N. D’Hondt, J. Dansana, S. De Moor, A. Delcourt, M. Heyen, F. Hong, Y. Lowette, S. Makarenko, I. Müller, D. Tavernier, S. Tytgat, M. Van Onsem, G. P. Van Putte, S. Vannerom, D. Bilin, B. Clerbaux, B. Das, A. K. De Bruyn, I. De Lentdecker, G. Evard, H. Favart, L. Gianneios, P. Khalilzadeh, A. Khan, F. A. Malara, A. Shahzad, M. A. Thomas, L. Vanden Bemden, M. Vander Velde, C. Vanlaer, P. De Coen, M. Dobur, D. Gokbulut, G. Knolle, J. Lambrecht, L. Marckx, D. Skovpen, K. Van Den Bossche, N. van der Linden, J. Vandenbroeck, J. Wezenbeek, L. Bein, S. Benecke, A. Bethani, A. Bruno, G. Caputo, C. De Favereau De Jeneret, J. Delaere, C. Donertas, I. S. Giammanco, A. Guzel, A. O. Jain, Sa. Lemaitre, V. Lidrych, J. Mastrapasqua, P. Tran, T. T. Turkcapar, S. Alves, G. A. Coelho, E. Correia Silva, G. Hensel, C. Menezes De Oliveira, T. Mora Herrera, C. Rebello Teles, P. Soeiro, M. Tonelli Manganote, E. J. Vilela Pereira, A. Aldá Júnior, W. L. Barroso Ferreira Filho, M. Brandao Malbouisson, H. Carvalho, W. Chinellato, J. Da Costa, E. M. Da Silveira, G. G. De Jesus Damiao, D. Fonseca De Souza, S. Gomes De Souza, R. Laux Kuhn, T. Macedo, M. Martins, J. Mota Amarilo, K. Mundim, L. Nogima, H. Pinheiro, J. P. Santoro, A. Sznajder, A. Thiel, M. Bernardes, C. A. Calligaris, L. Fernandez Perez Tomei, T. R. Gregores, E. M. Maietto Silverio, I. Mercadante, P. G. Novaes, S. F. Orzari, B. Padula, Sandra S. Scheurer, V. Aleksandrov, A. Antchev, G. Hadjiiska, R. Iaydjiev, P. Misheva, M. Shopova, M. Sultanov, G. Dimitrov, A. Litov, L. Pavlov, B. Petkov, P. Petrov, A. Shumka, E. Keshri, S. Laroze, D. Thakur, S. Cheng, T. Javaid, T. Yuan, L. Hu, Z. Liang, Z. Liu, J. Chen, G. M. Chen, H. Yerevan Physics Institute Yerevan Armenia Yerevan State University Yerevan Armenia Institut für Hochenergiephysik Vienna Austria TU Wien Vienna Austria Universiteit Antwerpen Antwerpen Belgium Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussel Belgium Ghent University Ghent Belgium Université Libre de Bruxelles Bruxelles Belgium Université Catholique de Louvain Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil FACAMP — Faculdades de Campinas Sao Paulo Brazil Universidade Estadual de Campinas Campinas Brazil Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre Brazil Universidade Estadual Paulista Universidade Federal do ABC São Paulo Brazil Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Sofia Bulgaria University of Sofia Sofia Bulgaria Instituto De Alta Investigación Universidad de Tarapacá Arica Chile Beihang University Beijing China Department of Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China Center of Advanced Science and Technology Beijing China Spallation Neutron Source Guangdong China State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology Peking University Beijing China Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Science and Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory of Quantum Matter South China Normal University Guangzhou China Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou China University of Science and Technology of China Hefei China Nanjing Normal University Nanjing China Henan Normal University Xinxiang China University of Shanghai for Science and Technology Shanghai China The University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa U.S.A. Institute of Modern Physics and Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-beam Application (MOE) — Fudan University Shanghai China Zhejiang University Hangzhou China Universidad de Los Andes Bogota Colombia Universidad

The measurements of the Higgs boson (H) production cross sections performed by the CMS Collaboration in the four-lepton (4ℓ, ℓ = e, μ) final state at a center-of-mass energy $$\sqrt{s}$$ = 13.6 TeV are presented. These measurements are based on data collected with the CMS detector at the CERN LHC in 2022, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 34.7 fb−1. Cross sections are measured in a fiducial region closely matching the experimental acceptance, both inclusively and differentially, as a function of the transverse momentum and the absolute value of the rapidity of the four-lepton system. The H → ZZ → 4ℓ inclusive fiducial cross section is measured to be $${2.89}_{-0.49}^{+0.53}{\left({\text{stat}}\right)}_{-0.21}^{+0.29}\left({\text{syst}}\right)$$ fb, in agreement with the standard model expectation of $${3.09}_{-0.24}^{+0.27}$$ fb.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Reweighting simulated events using machine-learning techniques in the CMS experiment

引用

The European Physical Journal C 2025年第5期85卷 1-35页

作者： Hayrapetyan, A. Tumasyan, A. Adam, W. Andrejkovic, J. W. Benato, L. Bergauer, T. Chatterjee, S. Damanakis, K. Dragicevic, M. Hussain, P. S. Jeitler, M. Krammer, N. Li, A. Liko, D. Mikulec, I. Schieck, J. Schöfbeck, R. Schwarz, D. Sonawane, M. Waltenberger, W. Wulz, C.-E. Janssen, T. Van Laer, T. Van Mechelen, P. Breugelmans, N. D’Hondt, J. Dansana, S. De Moor, A. Delcourt, M. Heyen, F. Lowette, S. Makarenko, I. Müller, D. Tavernier, S. Tytgat, M. Van Onsem, G. P. Van Putte, S. Vannerom, D. Bilin, B. Clerbaux, B. Das, A. K. De Bruyn, I. De Lentdecker, G. Evard, H. Favart, L. Gianneios, P. Jaramillo, J. Khalilzadeh, A. Khan, F. A. Lee, K. Malara, A. Paredes, S. Shahzad, M. A. Thomas, L. Vanden Bemden, M. Vander Velde, C. Vanlaer, P. De Coen, M. Dobur, D. Gokbulut, G. Hong, Y. Knolle, J. Lambrecht, L. Marckx, D. Mota Amarilo, K. Skovpen, K. Van Den Bossche, N. van der Linden, J. Wezenbeek, L. Benecke, A. Bethani, A. Bruno, G. Caputo, C. De Favereau De Jeneret, J. Delaere, C. Donertas, I. S. Giammanco, A. Guzel, A. O. Jain, Sa. Lemaitre, V. Lidrych, J. Mastrapasqua, P. Tran, T. T. Turkcapar, S. Alves, G. A. Coelho, E. Correia Silva, G. Hensel, C. Menezes De Oliveira, T. Mora Herrera, C. Rebello Teles, P. Soeiro, M. Tonelli Manganote, E. J. Vilela Pereira, A. Aldá Júnior, W. L. Barroso Ferreira Filho, M. Brandao Malbouisson, H. Carvalho, W. Chinellato, J. Da Costa, E. M. Da Silveira, G. G. De Jesus Damiao, D. Fonseca De Souza, S. Gomes De Souza, R. Laux Kuhn, T. Macedo, M. Martins, J. Mundim, L. Nogima, H. Pinheiro, J. P. Santoro, A. Sznajder, A. Thiel, M. Bernardes, C. A. Calligaris, L. Fernandez Perez Tomei, T. R. Gregores, E. M. Maietto Silverio, I. Mercadante, P. G. Novaes, S. F. Orzari, B. Padula, Sandra S. Aleksandrov, A. Antchev, G. Hadjiiska, R. Iaydjiev, P. Misheva, M. Shopova, M. Sultanov, G. Dimitrov, A. Litov, L. Pavlov, B. Petkov, P. Petrov, A. Shumka, E. Keshri, S. Laroze, D. Thakur, S. Cheng, T. Javaid, T. Yuan, L. Hu, Z. Liang, Z. Liu, J. Chen, G. M. Chen, H. S. Chen, M. Iemmi, F. Jiang, C. H. Kapoor, Yerevan Physics Institute Yerevan Armenia Yerevan State University Yerevan Armenia Institut für Hochenergiephysik Vienna Austria TU Wien Vienna Austria Universiteit Antwerpen Antwerp Belgium Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussels Belgium Ghent University Ghent Belgium Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium Université Catholique de Louvain Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil FACAMP-Faculdades de Campinas São Paulo Brazil Universidade Estadual de Campinas Campinas Brazil Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre Brazil Universidade Estadual Paulista Universidade Federal do ABC São Paulo Brazil Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Sofia Bulgaria University of Sofia Sofia Bulgaria Instituto De Alta Investigación Universidad de Tarapacá Arica Chile Beihang University Beijing China Department of Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China China Center of Advanced Science and Technology Beijing China China Spallation Neutron Source Dongguan China State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology Peking University Beijing China Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Science and Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory of Quantum Matter South China Normal University Guangzhou China Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou China University of Science and Technology of China Hefei China Nanjing Normal University Nanjing China Henan Normal University Xinxiang China University of Shanghai for Science and Technology Shanghai China The University of Iowa Iowa City USA Institute of Modern Physics and Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-beam Application (MOE) Fudan University Shanghai China Zhejiang University Hangzhou China Universidad de Los Andes Bogotá Colombia Universidad de

data analyses in particle physics rely on an accurate simulation of particle collisions and a detailed simulation of detector effects to extract physics knowledge from the recorded data. Event generators together with a geant-based simulation of the detectors are used to produce large samples of simulated events for analysis by the LHC experiments. These simulations come at a high computational cost, where the detector simulation and reconstruction algorithms have the largest CPU demands. This article describes how machine-learning (ML) techniques are used to reweight simulated samples obtained with a given set of parameters to samples with different parameters or samples obtained from entirely different simulation programs. The ML reweighting method avoids the need for simulating the detector response multiple times by incorporating the relevant information in a single sample through event weights. Results are presented for reweighting to model variations and higher-order calculations in simulated top quark pair production at the LHC. This ML-based reweighting is an important element of the future computing model of the CMS experiment and will facilitate precision measurements at the High-Luminosity LHC.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Search for heavy long-lived charged particles with large ionization energy loss in proton-proton collisions at = 13 TeV

引用

Journal of High Energy Physics 2025年第4期2025卷 1-46页

A search for heavy, long-lived, charged particles with large ionization energy loss within the silicon tracker of the CMS experiment is presented. A data set of proton-proton collisions at a center of mass energy at $$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 13 TeV, collected in 2017 and 2018 at the CERN LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 101 fb−1, is used in this analysis. Two different approaches for the search are taken. A new method exploits the independence of the silicon pixel and strips measurements, while the second method improves on previous techniques using ionization to determine a mass selection. No significant excess of events above the background expectation is observed. The results are interpreted in the context of the pair production of supersymmetric particles, namely gluinos, top squarks, and tau sleptons, and of the Drell-Yan pair production of fourth generation (τ′) leptons with an electric charge equal to or twice the absolute value of the electron charge (e). An interpretation of a Z’ boson decaying to two τ′ leptons with an electric charge equal to 2e is presented for the first time. The 95% confidence upper limits on the production cross section are extracted for each of these hypothetical particles.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Constraints on standard model effective field theory for a Higgs boson produced in association with W or Z bosons in the H → decay channel in proton-proton collisions at = 13 TeV

引用

Journal of High Energy Physics 2025年第3期2025卷 1-66页

作者： Chekhovsky, V. Hayrapetyan, A. Makarenko, V. Tumasyan, A. Adam, W. Andrejkovic, J. W. Benato, L. Bergauer, T. Chatterjee, S. Damanakis, K. Dragicevic, M. Hussain, P. S. Jeitler, M. Krammer, N. Li, A. Liko, D. Mikulec, I. Schieck, J. Schöfbeck, R. Schwarz, D. Sonawane, M. Waltenberger, W. Wulz, C.-E. Janssen, T. Kwon, H. Van Laer, T. Van Mechelen, P. Breugelmans, N. D’Hondt, J. Dansana, S. De Moor, A. Delcourt, M. Heyen, F. Hong, Y. Lowette, S. Makarenko, I. Müller, D. Tavernier, S. Tytgat, M. Van Onsem, G. P. Van Putte, S. Vannerom, D. Bilin, B. Clerbaux, B. Das, A. K. De Bruyn, I. De Lentdecker, G. Evard, H. Favart, L. Gianneios, P. Khalilzadeh, A. Khan, F. A. Malara, A. Shahzad, M. A. Thomas, L. Vanden Bemden, M. Vander Velde, C. Vanlaer, P. De Coen, M. Dobur, D. Gokbulut, G. Knolle, J. Lambrecht, L. Marckx, D. Skovpen, K. Van Den Bossche, N. van der Linden, J. Vandenbroeck, J. Wezenbeek, L. Bein, S. Benecke, A. Bethani, A. Bruno, G. Caputo, C. De Favereau De Jeneret, J. Delaere, C. Donertas, I. S. Giammanco, A. Guzel, A. O. Jain, Sa. Lemaitre, V. Lidrych, J. Mastrapasqua, P. Tran, T. T. Turkcapar, S. Alves, G. A. Coelho, E. Correia Silva, G. Hensel, C. Menezes De Oliveira, T. Mora Herrera, C. Rebello Teles, P. Soeiro, M. Tonelli Manganote, E. J. Vilela Pereira, A. Aldá Júnior, W. L. Barroso Ferreira Filho, M. Brandao Malbouisson, H. Carvalho, W. Chinellato, J. Da Costa, E. M. Da Silveira, G. G. De Jesus Damiao, D. Fonseca De Souza, S. Gomes De Souza, R. Laux Kuhn, T. Macedo, M. Martins, J. Mota Amarilo, K. Mundim, L. Nogima, H. Pinheiro, J. P. Santoro, A. Sznajder, A. Thiel, M. Bernardes, C. A. Calligaris, L. Fernandez Perez Tomei, T. R. Gregores, E. M. Maietto Silverio, I. Mercadante, P. G. Novaes, S. F. Orzari, B. Padula, Sandra S. Scheurer, V. Aleksandrov, A. Antchev, G. Hadjiiska, R. Iaydjiev, P. Misheva, M. Shopova, M. Sultanov, G. Dimitrov, A. Litov, L. Pavlov, B. Petkov, P. Petrov, A. Shumka, E. Keshri, S. Laroze, D. Thakur, S. Cheng, T. Javaid, T. Yuan, L. Hu, Z. Liang, Z. Liu, J. Chen, G. M. Chen, H. Yerevan Physics Institute Yerevan Armenia Yerevan State University Yerevan Armenia Institut für Hochenergiephysik Vienna Austria TU Wien Vienna Austria Universiteit Antwerpen Antwerpen Belgium Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussel Belgium Ghent University Ghent Belgium Université Libre de Bruxelles Bruxelles Belgium Université Catholique de Louvain Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas Rio de Janeiro Brazil Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil FACAMP — Faculdades de Campinas Sao Paulo Brazil Universidade Estadual de Campinas Campinas Brazil Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre Brazil Universidade Estadual Paulista Universidade Federal do ABC São Paulo Brazil Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Sofia Bulgaria University of Sofia Sofia Bulgaria Instituto De Alta Investigación Universidad de Tarapacá Arica Chile Beihang University Beijing China Department of Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China China Center of Advanced Science and Technology Beijing China China Spallation Neutron Source Guangdong China State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology Peking University Beijing China Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Science and Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory of Quantum Matter South China Normal University Guangzhou China Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou China University of Science and Technology of China Hefei China Nanjing Normal University Nanjing China Henan Normal University Xinxiang China University of Shanghai for Science and Technology Shanghai China The University of Iowa Iowa City U.S.A. Institute of Modern Physics and Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-beam Application (MOE) — Fudan University Shanghai China Zhejiang University Hangzhou China Universidad de Los Andes Bogota Colombia Unive

A standard model effective field theory (SMEFT) analysis with dimension-six operators probing nonresonant new physics effects is performed in the Higgs-strahlung process, where the Higgs boson is produced in association with a W or Z boson, in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The final states in which the W or Z boson decays leptonically and the Higgs boson decays to a pair of bottom quarks are considered. The analyzed data were collected by the CMS experiment between 2016 and 2018 and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb−1. An approach designed to simultaneously optimize the sensitivity to Wilson coefficients of multiple SMEFT operators is employed. Likelihood scans as functions of the Wilson coefficients that carry SMEFT sensitivity in this final state are performed for different expansions in SMEFT. The results are consistent with the predictions of the standard model.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：