检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on computer vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, CVPRW 2023

作者： Conde, Marcos V. Zamfir, Eduard Timofte, Radu Motilla, Daniel Liu, Cen Zhang, Zexin Peng, Yunbo Lin, Yue Guo, Jiaming Zou, Xueyi Chen, Yuyi Liu, Yi Hao, Jia Yan, Youliang Zhang, Yuanfan Li, Gen Sun, Lei Kong, Lingshun Bai, Haoran Pan, Jinshan Dong, Jiangxin Tang, Jinhui Ayazoglu, Mustafa Bilecen, Bahri Batuhan Li, Mingxi Zhang, Yuhang Fan, Xianjun Sheng, Yankai Sun, Long Liu, Zibin Gou, Weiran Li, Shaoqing Yi, Ziyao Xiang, Yan Kong, Dehui Xu, Ke Gankhuyag, Ganzorig Yoon, Kihwan Zhang, Jin Yu, Gaocheng Zhang, Feng Wang, Hongbin Zhou, Zhou Chao, Jiahao Gao, Hongfan Gong, Jiali Yang, Zhengfeng Zeng, Zhenbing Chen, Chengpeng Guo, Zichao Park, Anjin Liu, Yuqing Jia, Qi Yu, Hongyuan Yin, Xuanwu Zuo, Kunlong Zhang, Dongyang Fu, Ting Cheng, Zhengxue Zhu, Shiai Zhou, Dajiang Yu, Weichen Ge, Lin Dong, Jiahua Zou, Yajun Wu, Zhuoyuan Han, Binnan Zhang, Xiaolin Zhang, Heng Shao, Ben Zheng, Shaolong Yin, Daheng Chen, Baijun Liu, Mengyang Nistor, Marian-Sergiu Chen, Yi-Chung Huang, Zhi-Kai Chiang, Yuan-Chun Chen, Wei-Ting Yang, Hao-Hsiang Chang, Hua-En Chen, I-Hsiang Hsieh, Chia-Hsuan Kuo, Sy-Yen Vo, Tu Yan, Qingsen Zhu, Yun Su, Jinqiu Zhang, Yanning Zhang, Cheng Luo, Jiaying Cho, Youngsun Lee, Nakyung Computer Vision Lab CAIDAS IFI University of Würzburg Germany Sony Interactive Entertainment CA United States Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. China NetEase Games AI Lab Nanjing University of Science and Technology China Tencent China Attrsense Korea Republic of Sanechips Co Ltd Ant Group China East China Normal University China Shopee Dalian University of Technology Xiaomi Inc. China China Zhejiang Dahua Technology Co. Ltd. China Multimedia Department Xiaomi Inc. China Korea Photonic Technology Institute Korea Republic of School of Computer Science and Engineering Southeast University China University Al. I. Cuza Iasi Romania Graduate Institute of Electronics Engineering National Taiwan University Taiwan Department of Electrical Engineering National Taiwan University Taiwan Graduate Institute of Communication Engineering National Taiwan University Taiwan ServiceNow United States Northwestern Polytechnical University China KC Machine Learning Lab CJ OliveNetworks AI Research

ISBN: (纸本)9798350302493

This paper introduces a novel benchmark for efficient up-scaling as part of the NTIRE 2023 Real-Time Image Super-Resolution (RTSR) Challenge, which aimed to upscale images from 720p and 1080p resolution to native 4K (×2 and ×3 factors) in real-time on commercial GPUs. For this, we use a new test set containing diverse 4K images ranging from digital art to gaming and photography. We assessed the methods devised for 4K SR by measuring their runtime, parameters, and FLOPs, while ensuring a minimum PSNR fidelity over Bicubic interpolation. Out of the 170 participants, 25 teams contributed to this report, making it the most comprehensive benchmark to date and showcasing the latest advancements in real-time SR. © 2023 IEEE.

关键词： Program processors

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Corrections to “RespiroDynamics: A Multifaceted Dataset for Enhanced Lung Health Assessment Using Deep learning”

引用

IEEE Access 2024年 12卷 118831-118831页

作者： Ahmed Sharshar Muhammad Sharshar Hosam Elhady Ahmed Aboeitta Youssef Nafea Yasser Ashraf Mohammad Yaqub Mohsen Guizani Department of Computer Vision Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence (MBZUAI) Abu Dhabi United Arab Emirates Cyber-Physical Laboratory Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology (E-JUST) Alexandria Egypt Department of Natural Language Processing MBZUAI Abu Dhabi United Arab Emirates Department of Machine Learning MBZUAI Abu Dhabi United Arab Emirates

Presents corrections to the paper, RespiroDynamics: A Multifaceted Dataset for Enhanced Lung Health Assessment Using Deep learning.

关键词： Deep learning Lung

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline

引用

Behavior research methods 2023年第1期55卷 364-416页

作者： Kenneth Holmqvist Saga Lee Örbom Ignace T C Hooge Diederick C Niehorster Robert G Alexander Richard Andersson Jeroen S Benjamins Pieter Blignaut Anne-Marie Brouwer Lewis L Chuang Kirsten A Dalrymple Denis Drieghe Matt J Dunn Ulrich Ettinger Susann Fiedler Tom Foulsham Jos N van der Geest Dan Witzner Hansen Samuel B Hutton Enkelejda Kasneci Alan Kingstone Paul C Knox Ellen M Kok Helena Lee Joy Yeonjoo Lee Jukka M Leppänen Stephen Macknik Päivi Majaranta Susana Martinez-Conde Antje Nuthmann Marcus Nyström Jacob L Orquin Jorge Otero-Millan Soon Young Park Stanislav Popelka Frank Proudlock Frank Renkewitz Austin Roorda Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck Bonita Sharif Frederick Shic Mark Shovman Mervyn G Thomas Ward Venrooij Raimondas Zemblys Roy S Hessels Department of Psychology Nicolaus Copernicus University Torun Poland. kenneth.holmqvist@ur.de. Department of Computer Science and Informatics University of the Free State Bloemfontein South Africa. kenneth.holmqvist@ur.de. Department of Psychology Regensburg University Regensburg Germany. kenneth.holmqvist@ur.de. Department of Psychology Regensburg University Regensburg Germany. Experimental Psychology Helmholtz Institute Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands. Lund University Humanities Lab and Department of Psychology Lund University Lund Sweden. Department of Ophthalmology SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University Brooklyn NY USA. Tobii Pro AB Danderyd Sweden. Social Health and Organizational Psychology Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands. Department of Computer Science and Informatics University of the Free State Bloemfontein South Africa. TNO Soesterberg The Netherlands. Department of Ergonomics Leibniz Institute for Working Environments and Human Factors Dortmund Germany. Institute of Informatics LMU Munich Munich Germany. Institute of Child Development University of Minnesota Minneapolis USA. School of Psychology University of Southampton Southampton UK. School of Optometry and Vision Sciences Cardiff University Cardiff UK. Department of Psychology University of Bonn Bonn Germany. Vienna University of Economics and Business Vienna Austria. Department of Psychology University of Essex Essex UK. Department of Neuroscience Erasmus MC Rotterdam The Netherlands. Machine Learning Group Department of Computer Science IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark. SR Research Ltd Ottawa Canada. Human-Computer Interaction University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany. University of British Columbia Columbia Canada. Department of Eye and Vision Science Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences University of Liverpool Liverpool UK. Department of Education and Pedagogy Division Education Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences Ut

In this paper, we present a review of how the various aspects of any study using an eye tracker (such as the instrument, methodology, environment, participant, etc.) affect the quality of the recorded eye-tracking data and the obtained eye-movement and gaze measures. We take this review to represent the empirical foundation for reporting guidelines of any study involving an eye tracker. We compare this empirical foundation to five existing reporting guidelines and to a database of 207 published eye-tracking studies. We find that reporting guidelines vary substantially and do not match with actual reporting practices. We end by deriving a minimal, flexible reporting guideline based on empirical research (Section "An empirically based minimal reporting guideline").

关键词： Data quality Eye movements Eye tracking Replicability Reporting guidelines Reporting practices Reporting standards Reproducibility

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Lessons Learned from Assessing Trustworthy AI in Practice

引用

Digital Society 2023年第3期2卷 1-25页

作者： Vetter, Dennis Amann, Julia Bruneault, Frédérick Coffee, Megan Düdder, Boris Gallucci, Alessio Gilbert, Thomas Krendl Hagendorff, Thilo van Halem, Irmhild Hickman, Eleanore Hildt, Elisabeth Holm, Sune Kararigas, Georgios Kringen, Pedro Madai, Vince I. Wiinblad Mathez, Emilie Tithi, Jesmin Jahan Westerlund, Magnus Wurth, Renee Zicari, Roberto V. Computational Vision and Artificial Intelligence Lab Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt Am Main Germany Z-Inspection® Initiative Venice Italy Health Ethics and Policy Lab ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland Strategy and Innovation Careum Foundation Zurich Switzerland Philosophie Departement Collège André-Laurendeau Montréal Canada École Des Médias Université du Québec À Montréal Montréal Canada Department of Medicine Division of Infectious Diseases and Immunology New York University Grossman School of Medicine New York City USA Department of Computer Science University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Digital Life Initiative Cornell Tech New York City USA Cluster of Excellence “Machine Learning: New Perspectives for Science” University of Tuebingen Tuebingen Germany School of Law University of Bristol Bristol UK Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions Illinois Institute of Technology Chicago USA Department of Business Management and Analytics Arcada University of Applied Sciences Helsinki Finland Department of Food & Resource Economics University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Department of Physiology Faculty of Medicine University of Iceland Reykjavik Iceland QUEST Centre for Responsible Research Berlin Institute of Health Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany Faculty of Computing Engineering and the Built Environment School of Computing and Digital Technology Birmingham City University Birmingham UK Parallel Computing Labs Intel Santa Clara USA School of Economics Innovation and Technology Kristiania University College Oslo Norway Data Science Graduate School Seoul National University Seoul South Korea

Building artificial intelligence (AI) systems that adhere to ethical standards is a complex problem. Even though a multitude of guidelines for the design and development of such trustworthy AI systems exist, these guidelines focus on high-level and abstract requirements for AI systems, and it is often very difficult to assess if a specific system fulfills these requirements. The Z-Inspection® process provides a holistic and dynamic framework to evaluate the trustworthiness of specific AI systems at different stages of the AI lifecycle, including intended use, design, and development. It focuses, in particular, on the discussion and identification of ethical issues and tensions through the analysis of socio-technical scenarios and a requirement-based framework for ethical and trustworthy AI. This article is a methodological reflection on the Z-Inspection® process. We illustrate how high-level guidelines for ethical and trustworthy AI can be applied in practice and provide insights for both AI researchers and AI practitioners. We share the lessons learned from conducting a series of independent assessments to evaluate the trustworthiness of real-world AI systems, as well as key recommendations and practical suggestions on how to ensure a rigorous trustworthiness assessment throughout the lifecycle of an AI system. The results presented in this article are based on our assessments of AI systems in the healthcare sector and environmental monitoring, where we used the framework for trustworthy AI proposed in the Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI by the European Commission’s High-Level Expert Group on AI. However, the assessment process and the lessons learned can be adapted to other domains and include additional frameworks.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Braix Risk Score: An Automated Mammogram-Based Biomarker for Breast Cancer Created by Applying Artificial Intelligence

SSRN

引用

SSRN 2024年

作者： Hopper, John L. Nguyen, Tuong Linh Elliott, Michael S. Al-Qershi, Osamah Schmidt, Daniel F. Makalic, Enes Li, Shuai Fox, Samantha K. Dowty, James G. Peña-Solorzano, Carlos Andres Kwok, Chun Fung Chen, Yuanhong Wang, Chong Lippey, Jocelyn F. Brotchie, Peter Carneiro, Gustavo McCarthy, Davis J. Frazer, Helen M.L. Centre for Epidemiology & Biostatistics Melbourne School of Population and Global Health University of Melbourne Victoria Australia Bioinformatics and Cellular Genomics Unit St Vincent’s Institute of Medical Research Victoria Australia Melbourne Integrative Genomics School of Mathematics and Statistics School of BioSciences Faculty of Science University of Melbourne Victoria Australia Faculty of Information Technology Monash University ClaytonVIC Australia Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology Department of Public Health and Primary Care University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom Precision Medicine School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health Monash University ClaytonVIC Australia Murdoch Children’s Research Institute Royal Children’s Hospital ParkvilleVIC Australia School of Computer Science Australian Institute for Machine Learning University of Adelaide SA Australia Department of Surgery St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne VIC Australia Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences University of Melbourne Victoria Australia St Vincent’s BreastScreen St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne VIC Australia Department of Radiology St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne VIC Australia Centre for Vision Speech and Signal Processing University of Surrey United Kingdom BreastScreen Victoria VIC Australia

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to detect breast cancers from mammographic images are being developed. We evaluated the performance of an algorithm across all stages of the screening process and beyond. Methods: We used an image-specific AI-based breast cancer detection measure learnt from images of women attending BreastScreen Victoria (BRAIx cancer detection measure) to create a woman-specific standard normal mammography-based risk score (BRAIx risk score). Applying logistic regression to a random independent prospective testing cohort of 96,348 women, we estimated risk of invasive breast cancers: (i) detected at cohort entry (525);and (ii) for women given an all-clear, diagnosed during the next 4 years either at future screens (790) or during intervals between screens (308), as a function of the BRAIx risk score and other measures. We estimated the odds ratio per standard deviation (OR) and a greater risk in an upper ***: The BRAIx risk score predicted reader outcomes, recall, cancer detection and future risk. For 4-years risk, OR=2.70 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.52 to 2.88) overall with evidence for a greater OR in the upper tail (P=10-18). The predicted absolute risk was >10% for 1% of all-clear women. BRAIx risk score was greater for women with a family history and explained 23% (95% CI 21-25%) of familial aspects of risk. Mammographic density was weakly associated with risk before (OR=1.27;95% CI 1.20 to 1.35), but not after, fitting ***: The BRAIx risk score is a strong biomarker for breast cancer that could be used to inform risk-based recall for further assessment, detection and future screening. Its use would automatically identify all-clear women at similar risk to BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. BRAIx could also reveal insights into both familial and non-familial causes. Funding: Medical Research Future Fund, the Ramaciotti Foundation, National Breast Cancer Foundation, Cancer *** o

关键词： Mammography

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

222P Artificial intelligence (AI) based prognostication from baseline computed tomography (CT) scans in a phase III advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) trial

引用

Annals of Oncology 2024年 35卷 S304-S304页

作者： O.F. Khan J. Montalt-Tordera J. Riskas S.A. Haider V. Sivan O. Samorodova J. Hennessy A. Mitchell S.S. Mohammadi E. Di Tomaso T. Banerji F. Baldauf-Lenschen C. Glaus Oncology Department Cumming School of Medicine Tom Baker Cancer Centre Calgary AB Canada Computer Vision & Sound Analysis Bayer Hispania S.L. Sant Joan Despí Spain Machine Learning Altis Labs Inc. Toronto ON Canada Radiology Altis Labs Inc. Toronto ON Canada Data Altis Labs Inc. Toronto ON Canada Biostatistics Altis Labs Inc. Toronto ON Canada Computer Vision & Sound Analysis Bayer AG Leverkusen Germany Translational Sciences Oncology Bayer U.S. LLC Cambridge MA USA Digital Lead Global Brands Bayer U.S. LLC Whippany NJ USA Executive Altis Labs Inc. Toronto ON Canada

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Standardized Assessment of Automatic Segmentation of White Matter Hyperintensities and Results of the WMH Segmentation Challenge

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2019年

作者： Kuijf, Hugo J. Biesbroek, J. Matthijs Bresser, Jeroen de Heinen, Rutger Andermatt, Simon Bento, Mariana Berseth, Matt Belyaev, Mikhail Cardoso, M. Jorge Casamitjana, Adrià Collins, D. Louis Dadar, Mahsa Georgiou, Achilleas Ghafoorian, Mohsen Jin, Dakai Khademi, April Knight, Jesse Li, Hongwei Lladó, Xavier Luna, Miguel Mahmood, Qaiser McKinley, Richard Mehrtash, Alireza Ourselin, Sébastien Park, Bo-yong Park, Hyunjin Park, Sang Hyun Pezold, Simon Puybareau, Elodie Rittner, Leticia Sudre, Carole H. Valverde, Sergi Vilaplana, Verónica Wiest, Roland Xu, Yongchao Xu, Ziyue Zeng, Guodong Zhang, Jianguo Zheng, Guoyan Chen, Christopher Flier, Wiesje van der Barkhof, Frederik Viergever, Max A. Biessels, Geert Jan Image Sciences Institute UMC Utrecht Utrecht University Netherlands Brain Center Rudolf Magnus UMC Utrecht Utrecht University Netherlands Department of Radiology UMC Utrecht Department of Radiology LUMC Leiden Netherlands Department of Biomedical Engineering University of Basel Allschwil Switzerland Radiology and Clinical Neuroscience Hotchkiss Brain Institute University of Calgary AB Canada NLP Logix Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences King’s College London Centre for Medical Image Computing University College London Signal Theory and Communications Department Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya BarcelonaTech Barcelona Spain McGill University Canada Computational Statistics and Machine Learning MSc University College London TomTom Amsterdam Netherlands Department of Radiology and Imaging Science National Institutes of Health United States Ryerson University Canada University of Guelph Canada Sun Yat-sen University University of Dundee Technical University of Munich Research institute of Computer Vision and Robotics University of Girona Spain Department of Robotics Engineering Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology Daegu Korea Republic of Pakistan Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology Support Center for Advanced Neuroimaging Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology Inselspital University of Bern Switzerland Electrical and Computer Engineering Department University of British Columbia Vancouver Department of Radiology Brigham and Women’s Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences King’s College London Suwon Korea Republic of School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering Sungkyunkwan University Suwon Korea Republic of France School of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Campinas SP Brazil School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences King’s College London Centre for Medical I

Quantification of cerebral white matter hyperintensities (WMH) of presumed vascular origin is of key importance in many neurological research studies. Currently, measurements are often still obtained from manual segmentations on brain MR images, which is a laborious procedure. Automatic WMH segmentation methods exist, but a standardized comparison of the performance of such methods is lacking. We organized a scientific challenge, in which developers could evaluate their method on a standardized multi-center/-scanner image dataset, giving an objective comparison: the WMH Segmentation Challenge (https://***/).Sixty T1+FLAIR images from three MR scanners were released with manual WMH segmentations for training. A test set of 110 images from five MR scanners was used for evaluation. Segmentation methods had to be containerized and submitted to the challenge organizers. Five evaluation metrics were used to rank the methods: (1) Dice similarity coefficient, (2) modified Hausdorff distance (95th percentile), (3) absolute log-transformed volume difference, (4) sensitivity for detecting individual lesions, and (5) F1-score for individual lesions. Additionally, methods were ranked on their inter-scanner *** participants submitted their method for evaluation. This paper provides a detailed analysis of the results. In brief, there is a cluster of four methods that rank significantly better than the other methods, with one clear winner. The inter-scanner robustness ranking shows that not all methods generalize to unseen *** challenge remains open for future submissions and provides a public platform for method evaluation. Copyright © 2019, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Magnetic resonance imaging

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

AIROGS: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR ROBUST GLAUCOMA SCREENING CHALLENGE

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2023年

作者： De Vente, Coen Vermeer, Koenraad A. Jaccard, Nicolas Wang, He Sun, Hongyi Khader, Firas Truhn, Daniel Aimyshev, Temirgali Zhanibekuly, Yerkebulan Le, Tien-Dung Galdran, Adrian Ballester, Miguel Ángel González Carneiro, Gustavo Devika, R.G. Hrishikesh, P.S. Puthussery, Densen Liu, Hong Yang, Zekang Kondo, Satoshi Kasai, Satoshi Wang, Edward Durvasula, Ashritha Heras, Jónathan Zapata, Miguel Ángel Araújo, Teresa Aresta, Guilherme Bogunović, Hrvoje Arikan, Mustafa Lee, Yeong Chan Cho, Hyun Bin Choi, Yoon Ho Qayyum, Abdul Razzak, Imran Van Ginneken, Bram Lemij, Hans G. Sánchez, Clara I. Group Informatics Institute Universiteit Van Amsterdam Noord-Holland Amsterdam Netherlands The Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics Amsterdam Umc Locatie Amc Noord-Holland Amsterdam Netherlands Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Radboudumc Gelderland Nijmegen Netherlands The Rotterdam Ophthalmic Institute Rotterdam Eye Hospital Rotterdam Netherlands Project Orbis International Inc. New York United States The Peking Union Medical College Hospital Beijing China The Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing100053 China The Tsinghua University Beijing China The Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology University Hospital Aachen Aachen Germany Cmc Technologies Llp Nur-Sultan Kazakhstan Kbc Belgium Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona Spain The Australian Institute for Machine Learning Aiml University of Adelaide Australia Icrea Barcelona Spain The Centre for Vision Speech and Signal Processing University of Surrey United Kingdom The College of Engineering Trivandrum India Founding Minds Software India The Institute of Computing Technology Chinese Academy of Sciences China The Muroran Institute of Technology Japan The Niigata University of Health and Welfare Japan The Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry University of Western Ontario London Canada The Department of Mathematics and Computer Science University of la Rioja Spain Hospital Vall Hebron Passeig Roser 126 Sant Cugat del Vallès Barcelona08195 Spain UPRetina Barcelona Spain The Christian Doppler Laboratory for Artificial Intelligence in Retina Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria The Institute of Ophthalmology University College London London United Kingdom The Research Institute for Future Medicine Samsung Medical Center Seoul Korea Republic of Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center Seoul Korea Republic of The Department of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics Mayo Clinic Jacks

The early detection of glaucoma is essential in preventing visual impairment. Artificial intelligence (AI) can be used to analyze color fundus photographs (CFPs) in a cost-effective manner, making glaucoma screening more accessible. While AI models for glaucoma screening from CFPs have shown promising results in laboratory settings, their performance decreases significantly in realworld scenarios due to the presence of out-of-distribution and low-quality images. To address this issue, we propose the Artificial Intelligence for Robust Glaucoma Screening (AIROGS) challenge. This challenge includes a large dataset of around 113,000 images from about 60,000 patients and 500 different screening centers, and encourages the development of algorithms that are robust to ungradable and unexpected input data. We evaluated solutions from 14 teams in this paper, and found that the best teams performed similarly to a set of 20 expert ophthalmologists and optometrists. The highest-scoring team achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-0.99) for detecting ungradable images on-the-fly. Additionally, many of the algorithms showed robust performance when tested on three other publicly available datasets. These results demonstrate the feasibility of robust AI-enabled glaucoma screening. Copyright © 2023, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Diagnosis

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Why is the Winner the Best?

Why is the Winner the Best?

引用

Conference on computer vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

作者： M. Eisenmann A. Reinke V. Weru M. D. Tizabi F. Isensee T. J. Adler S. Ali V. Andrearczyk M. Aubreville U. Baid S. Bakas N. Balu S. Bano J. Bernal S. Bodenstedt A. Casella V. Cheplygina M. Daum M. De Bruijne A. Depeursinge R. Dorent J. Egger D. G. Ellis S. Engelhardt M. Ganz N. Ghatwary G. Girard P. Godau A. Gupta L. Hansen K. Harada M. Heinrich N. Heller A. Hering A. Huaulmé P. Jannin A. E. Kavur O. Kodym M. Kozubek J. Li H. Li J. Ma C. Martín-Isla B. Menze A. Noble V. Oreiller N. Padoy S. Pati K. Payette T. Rädsch J. Rafael-Patiño V. Singh Bawa S. Speidel C. H. Sudre K. Van Wijnen M. Wagner D. Wei A. Yamlahi M. H. Yap C. Yuan M. Zenk A. Zia D. Zimmerer D. Aydogan B. Bhattarai L. Bloch R. Brüngel J. Cho C. Choi Q. Dou I. Ezhov C. M. Friedrich C. Fuller R. R. Gaire A. Galdran Á. García Faura M. Grammatikopoulou S. Hong M. Jahanifar I. Jang A. Kadkhodamohammadi I. Kang F. Kofler S. Kondo H. Kuijf M. Li M. Luu T. Martinčič P. Morais M. A. Naser B. Oliveira D. Owen S. Pang J. Park S. Park S. Płotka E. Puybareau N. Rajpoot K. Ryu N. Saeed A. Shephard P. Shi D. Štepec R. Subedi G. Tochon H. R. Torres H. Urien J. L. Vilaça K. A. Wahid H. Wang J. Wang L. Wang X. Wang B. Wiestler M. Wodzinski F. Xia J. Xie Z. Xiong S. Yang Y. Yang Z. Zhao K. Maier-Hein P. F. Jäger A. Kopp-Schneider L. Maier-Hein Division of Intelligent Medical Systems German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Helmholtz Imaging German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Division of Biostatistics German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Division of Medical Image Computing German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences School of Computing University of Leeds Leeds UK Institute of Informatics School of Management HES-SO Valais-Wallis University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland Sierre Switzerland Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Lausanne University Hospital Lausanne Switzerland Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt Ingolstadt Germany Center for Artificial Intelligence and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D) and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA) University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Radiology University of Washington Seattle WA USA Department of Computer Science Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS) University College London London UK Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona & Computer Vision Center Barcelona Spain Division of Translational Surgical Oncology National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC) Dresden Dresden Germany Department of Advanced Robotics Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia Italy Department of Electronics Information and Bioengineering Politecnico di Milano Milan Italy IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Department of General Visceral and Transplantation Surgery Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany Department of Radiology and Nuc

International benchmarking competitions have become fundamental for the comparative performance assessment of image analysis methods. However, little attention has been given to investigating what can be learnt from these competitions. Do they really generate scientific progress? What are common and successful participation strategies? What makes a solution superior to a competing method? To address this gap in the literature, we performed a multicenter study with all 80 competitions that were conducted in the scope of IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021. Statistical analyses performed based on comprehensive descriptions of the submitted algorithms linked to their rank as well as the underlying participation strategies revealed common characteristics of winning solutions. These typically include the use of multi-task learning (63%) and/or multi-stage pipelines (61%), and a focus on augmentation (100%), image preprocessing (97%), data curation (79%), and post-processing (66%). The “typical” lead of a winning team is a computer scientist with a doctoral degree, five years of experience in biomedical image analysis, and four years of experience in deep learning. Two core general development strategies stood out for highly-ranked teams: the reflection of the metrics in the method design and the focus on analyzing and handling failure cases. According to the organizers, 43% of the winning algorithms exceeded the state of the art but only 11% completely solved the respective domain problem. The insights of our study could help researchers (1) improve algorithm development strategies when approaching new problems, and (2) focus on open research questions revealed by this work.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Why is the winner the best?

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2023年

作者： Eisenmann, M. Reinke, A. Weru, V. Tizabi, M.D. Isensee, F. Adler, T.J. Ali, S. Andrearczyk, V. Aubreville, M. Baid, U. Bakas, S. Balu, N. Bano, S. Bernal, J. Bodenstedt, S. Casella, A. Cheplygina, V. Daum, M. de Bruijne, M. Depeursinge, A. Dorent, R. Egger, J. Ellis, D.G. Engelhardt, S. Ganz, M. Ghatwary, N. Girard, G. Godau, P. Gupta, A. Hansen, L. Harada, K. Heinrich, M. Heller, N. Hering, A. Huaulmé, A. Jannin, P. Kavur, A.E. Kodym, O. Kozubek, M. Li, J. Li, H. Ma, J. Martín-Isla, C. Menze, B. Noble, A. Oreiller, V. Padoy, N. Pati, S. Payette, K. Rädsch, T. Rafael-Patiño, J. Bawa, V. Singh Speidel, S. Sudre, C.H. van Wijnen, K. Wagner, M. Wei, D. Yamlahi, A. Yap, M.H. Yuan, C. Zenk, M. Zia, A. Zimmerer, D. Aydogan, D. Bhattarai, B. Bloch, L. Brüngel, R. Cho, J. Choi, C. Dou, Q. Ezhov, I. Friedrich, C.M. Fuller, C. Gaire, R.R. Galdran, A. Faura, Á. García Grammatikopoulou, M. Hong, S. Jahanifar, M. Jang, I. Kadkhodamohammadi, A. Kang, I. Kofler, F. Kondo, S. Kuijf, H. Li, M. Luu, M. Martinčič, T. Morais, P. Naser, M.A. Oliveira, B. Owen, D. Pang, S. Park, J. Park, S. Plotka, S. Puybareau, E. Rajpoot, N. Ryu, K. Saeed, N. Shephard, A. Shi, P. Štepec, D. Subedi, R. Tochon, G. Torres, H.R. Urien, H. Vilaça, J.L. Wahid, K.A. Wang, H. Wang, J. Wang, L. Wang, X. Wiestler, B. Wodzinski, M. Xia, F. Xie, J. Xiong, Z. Yang, S. Yang, Y. Zhao, Z. Maier-Hein, K. Jäger, P.F. Kopp-Schneider, A. Maier-Hein, L. Heidelberg Germany Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Heidelberg Germany Heidelberg Germany School of Computing Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences University of Leeds Leeds United Kingdom Institute of Informatics School of Management HES-SO Valais-Wallis University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland Sierre Switzerland Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Lausanne University Hospital Lausanne Switzerland Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt Ingolstadt Germany University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology University of Washington SeattleWA United States Department of Computer Science University College London London United Kingdom Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona & Computer Vision Center Barcelona Spain Dresden Dresden Germany Department of Advanced Robotics Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia Italy IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Department of General Visceral and Transplantation Surgery Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Erasmus MC Rotterdam Netherlands Department of Computer Science University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Sierre Switzerland Harvard Medical School Brigham and Women’s Hospital BostonMA United States School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences King’s College London London United Kingdom Essen Germany University of Nebraska Medical Center OmahaNE United States Department of Internal Medicine III Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany Neurobiology Research Unit Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet C

International benchmarking competitions have become fundamental for the comparative performance assessment of image analysis methods. However, little attention has been given to investigating what can be learnt from these competitions. Do they really generate scientific progress? What are common and successful participation strategies? What makes a solution superior to a competing method? To address this gap in the literature, we performed a multicenter study with all 80 competitions that were conducted in the scope of IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021. Statistical analyses performed based on comprehensive descriptions of the submitted algorithms linked to their rank as well as the underlying participation strategies revealed common characteristics of winning solutions. These typically include the use of multi-task learning (63%) and/or multi-stage pipelines (61%), and a focus on augmentation (100%), image preprocessing (97%), data curation (79%), and postprocessing (66%). The "typical" lead of a winning team is a computer scientist with a doctoral degree, five years of experience in biomedical image analysis, and four years of experience in deep learning. Two core general development strategies stood out for highly-ranked teams: the reflection of the metrics in the method design and the focus on analyzing and handling failure cases. According to the organizers, 43% of the winning algorithms exceeded the state of the art but only 11% completely solved the respective domain problem. The insights of our study could help researchers (1) improve algorithm development strategies when approaching new problems, and (2) focus on open research questions revealed by this work. © 2023, CC BY.

关键词： Benchmarking

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：