检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

Comparison of online group discussion and class discussion learning for a soil mechanics class

IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2020年第3期830卷

作者： T S N Rachmawati C R Priadi F H Sagitaningrum B Swantika A Q Mairizal A Abdillah H B Santoso K Junus Civil Engineering Program Department of Civil Engineering Universitas Indonesia Depok 16424 Indonesia Engineering Education Working Group Faculty of Engineering Universitas Indonesia Depok 16424 Indonesia Environmental Engineering Program Department of Civil Engineering Universitas Indonesia Depok 16424 Indonesia Digital Library and Distance Learning Lab Faculty of Computer Science Universitas Indonesia Depok 16424 Indonesia

Soil Mechanics had been a fundamental science material that needs a great understanding of the concept. Many attempts had been done in varying the study method for this course. An attempt to utilize online discussion learning will be discussed in this paper. To analyze the online learning experience, the Community of Inquiry (CoI) model was utilized. The CoI model divides the dynamic online learning process as social presence, teaching presence, and cognitive presence. This study aims to compare the application of CoI in the Soil Mechanics course between two different types of discussion under the Civil Engineering Department at a large public university in Indonesia. The students of the Soil Mechanics course were given two types of problem-based online discussions for two learning topics. The first one was a case study of Consolidation Settlement in a Group Discussion, while the second one was a case study of Seepage in a Class Discussion, which was done in one single discussion forum. Through quantitative analysis of the students' discussion transcripts, it was found that cognitive presence was dominantly higher than teaching presence and social presence in both types of discussion. Finally, through an interview with students, it was found that students with active participation gain several benefits, among others, the better ability of systematic and critical thinking of interpreting a problem and growing sense of engineering compare to passive students.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：