检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

arXiv 2018年

作者： Siddiqui, Jalal K. Baskin, Elizabeth Liu, Mingrui Cantemir-Stone, Carmen Z. Zhang, Bofei Bonneville, Russell McElroy, Joseph P. Coombes, Kevin R. Mathé, Ewy A. Department of Biomedical Informatics College of Medicine Ohio State University ColumbusOH United States Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program Ohio State University ColumbusOH United States Comprehensive Cancer Center Department of Internal Medicine Ohio State University ColumbusOH United States Center for Biostatistics Ohio State University ColumbusOH United States

Background: Integration of transcriptomic and metabolomic data improves functional interpretation of disease-related metabolomic phenotypes, and facilitates discovery of putative metabolite biomarkers and gene targets. For this reason, these data are increasingly collected in large (> 100 participants) cohorts, thereby driving a need for the development of user-friendly and open-source methods/tools for their integration. Of note, clinical/translational studies typically provide snapshot (e.g. one time point) gene and metabolite profiles and, oftentimes, most metabolites measured are not identified. Thus, in these types of studies, pathway/network approaches that take into account the complexity of transcript-metabolite relationships may neither be applicable nor readily uncover novel relationships. With this in mind, we propose a simple linear modeling approach to capture disease-(or other phenotype) specific gene-metabolite associations, with the assumption that co-regulation patterns reflect functionally related genes and metabolites. Results: The proposed linear model, metabolite ~ gene + phenotype + gene:phenotype, specifically evaluates whether gene-metabolite relationships differ by phenotype, by testing whether the relationship in one phenotype is significantly different from the relationship in another phenotype (via a statistical interaction gene:phenotype p-value). Statistical interaction p-values for all possible gene-metabolite pairs are computed and significant pairs are then clustered by the directionality of associations (e.g. strong positive association in one phenotype, strong negative association in another phenotype). We implemented our approach as an R package, IntLIM, which includes a user-friendly R Shiny web interface, thereby making the integrative analyses accessible to non-computational experts. We applied IntLIM to two previously published datasets, collected in the NCI-60 cancer cell lines and in human breast tumor and non-tumor tissue,

关键词： Integration

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

BigNeuron: a resource to benchmark and predict performance of algorithms for automated tracing of neurons in light microscopy datasets

引用

Nature methods 2023年第6期20卷 824-835页

作者： Linus Manubens-Gil Zhi Zhou Hanbo Chen Arvind Ramanathan Xiaoxiao Liu Yufeng Liu Alessandro Bria Todd Gillette Zongcai Ruan Jian Yang Miroslav Radojević Ting Zhao Li Cheng Lei Qu Siqi Liu Kristofer E Bouchard Lin Gu Weidong Cai Shuiwang Ji Badrinath Roysam Ching-Wei Wang Hongchuan Yu Amos Sironi Daniel Maxim Iascone Jie Zhou Erhan Bas Eduardo Conde-Sousa Paulo Aguiar Xiang Li Yujie Li Sumit Nanda Yuan Wang Leila Muresan Pascal Fua Bing Ye Hai-Yan He Jochen F Staiger Manuel Peter Daniel N Cox Michel Simonneau Marcel Oberlaender Gregory Jefferis Kei Ito Paloma Gonzalez-Bellido Jinhyun Kim Edwin Rubel Hollis T Cline Hongkui Zeng Aljoscha Nern Ann-Shyn Chiang Jianhua Yao Jane Roskams Rick Livesey Janine Stevens Tianming Liu Chinh Dang Yike Guo Ning Zhong Georgia Tourassi Sean Hill Michael Hawrylycz Christof Koch Erik Meijering Giorgio A Ascoli Hanchuan Peng Institute for Brain and Intelligence Southeast University Nanjing China. Microsoft Corporation Redmond WA USA. Tencent AI Lab Bellevue WA USA. Computing Environment and Life Sciences Directorate Argonne National Laboratory Lemont IL USA. Kaya Medical Seattle WA USA. University of Cassino and Southern Lazio Cassino Italy. Center for Neural Informatics Structures and Plasticity Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study George Mason University Fairfax VA USA. Faculty of Information Technology Beijing University of Technology Beijing China. Beijing International Collaboration Base on Brain Informatics and Wisdom Services Beijing China. Nuctech Netherlands Rotterdam the Netherlands. Janelia Research Campus Howard Hughes Medical Institute Ashburn VA USA. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada. Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Intelligent Computation and Signal Processing Anhui University Hefei China. Paige AI New York NY USA. Scientific Data Division and Biological Systems and Engineering Division Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Berkeley CA USA. Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute and Redwood Center for Theoretical Neuroscience UC Berkeley Berkeley CA USA. RIKEN AIP Tokyo Japan. Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology (RCAST) The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan. School of Computer Science University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia. Texas A&M University College Station TX USA. Cullen College of Engineering University of Houston Houston TX USA. Graduate Institute of Biomedical Engineering National Taiwan University of Science and Technology Taipei Taiwan. National Centre for Computer Animation Bournemouth University Poole UK. PROPHESEE Paris France. Department of Neuroscience Columbia University New York NY USA. Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute Columbia University New York NY USA. Department of Computer Science Northern Illinois Universit

BigNeuron is an open community bench-testing platform with the goal of setting open standards for accurate and fast automatic neuron tracing. We gathered a diverse set of image volumes across several species that is representative of the data obtained in many neuroscience laboratories interested in neuron tracing. Here, we report generated gold standard manual annotations for a subset of the available imaging datasets and quantified tracing quality for 35 automatic tracing algorithms. The goal of generating such a hand-curated diverse dataset is to advance the development of tracing algorithms and enable generalizable benchmarking. Together with image quality features, we pooled the data in an interactive web application that enables users and developers to perform principal component analysis, t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding, correlation and clustering, visualization of imaging and tracing data, and benchmarking of automatic tracing algorithms in user-defined data subsets. The image quality metrics explain most of the variance in the data, followed by neuromorphological features related to neuron size. We observed that diverse algorithms can provide complementary information to obtain accurate results and developed a method to iteratively combine methods and generate consensus reconstructions. The consensus trees obtained provide estimates of the neuron structure ground truth that typically outperform single algorithms in noisy datasets. However, specific algorithms may outperform the consensus tree strategy in specific imaging conditions. Finally, to aid users in predicting the most accurate automatic tracing results without manual annotations for comparison, we used support vector machine regression to predict reconstruction quality given an image volume and a set of automatic tracings.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Chemical-Induced Disease Detection Using Invariance-based Pattern Learning Model 1

Chemical-Induced Disease Detection Using Invariance-based Pa...

引用

1st International Workshop on Digital Disease Detection using Social Media, DDDSM 2017, co-located with the 8th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, IJCNLP 2017

作者： Warikoo, Neha Chang, Yung-Chun Hsu, Wen-Lian Institute of Biomedical Informatics National Yang-Ming University Taipei112 Taiwan Bioinformatics Program Taiwan International Graduate Program Institute of Information Science Academia Sinica Taipei115 Taiwan Institute of Information Science Academia Sinica Taipei115 Taiwan Graduate Institute of Data Science Taipei Medical University Taipei106 Taiwan

ISBN: (纸本)9781948087070

In this work, we introduce a novel feature engineering approach named "algebraic invariance" to identify discriminative patterns for learning relation pair features for the chemical-disease relation (CDR) task of BioCreative V. Our method exploits the existing structural similarity of the key concepts of relation descriptions from the CDR corpus to generate robust linguistic patterns for SVM tree kernel-based learning. Preprocessing of the training data classifies the entity pairs as either related or unrelated to build instance types for both inter-sentential and intra-sentential scenarios. An invariant function is proposed to process and optimally cluster similar patterns for both positive and negative instances. The learning model for CDR pairs is based on the SVM tree kernel approach, which generates feature trees and vectors and is modeled on suitable invariance based patterns, bringing brevity, precision and context to the identifier features. Results demonstrate that our method outperformed compared approaches, achieved a high recall rate of 85.08%, and averaged an F1-score of 54.34% without the use of any additional knowledge bases. © 2017 AFNLP

关键词： Forestry

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Polygenic risk modeling for prediction of epithelial ovarian cancer risk (vol 30, pg 349, 2021)

引用

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS 2022年第5期30卷 630-631页

作者： Dareng, Eileen O. Tyrer, Jonathan P. Barnes, Daniel R. Jones, Michelle R. Yang, Xin Aben, Katja K. H. Adank, Muriel A. Agata, Simona Andrulis, Irene L. Anton-Culver, Hoda Antonenkova, Natalia N. Aravantinos, Gerasimos Arun, Banu K. Augustinsson, Annelie Balmana, Judith Bandera, Elisa V. Barkardottir, Rosa B. Barrowdale, Daniel Beckmann, Matthias W. Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia Benitez, Javier Bermisheva, Marina Bernardini, Marcus Q. Bjorge, Line Black, Amanda Bogdanova, Natalia V. Bonanni, Bernardo Borg, Ake Brenton, James D. Budzilowska, Agnieszka Butzow, Ralf Buys, Saundra S. Cai, Hui Caligo, Maria A. Campbell, Ian Cannioto, Rikki Cassingham, Hayley Chang-Claude, Jenny Chanock, Stephen J. Chen, Kexin Chiew, Yoke-Eng Chung, Wendy K. Claes, Kathleen B. M. Colonna, Sarah Cook, Linda S. Couch, Fergus J. Daly, Mary B. Dao, Fanny Davies, Eleanor de la Hoya, Miguel de Putter, Robin Dennis, Joe DePersia, Allison Devilee, Peter Diez, Orland Ding, Yuan Chun Doherty, Jennifer A. Domchek, Susan M. Dork, Thilo du Bois, Andreas Durst, Matthias Eccles, Diana M. Eliassen, Heather A. Engel, Christoph Evans, Gareth D. Fasching, Peter A. Flanagan, James M. Fortner, Renee T. Machackova, Eva Friedman, Eitan Ganz, Patricia A. Garber, Judy Gensini, Francesca Giles, Graham G. Glendon, Gord Godwin, Andrew K. Goodman, Marc T. Greene, Mark H. Gronwald, Jacek Hahnen, Eric Haiman, Christopher A. Hakansson, Niclas Hamann, Ute Hansen, Thomas V. O. Harris, Holly R. Hartman, Mikael Heitz, Florian Hildebrandt, Michelle A. T. Hogdall, Estrid Hogdall, Claus K. Hopper, John L. Huang, Ruea-Yea Huff, Chad Hulick, Peter J. Huntsman, David G. Imyanitov, Evgeny N. Isaacs, Claudine Jakubowska, Anna James, Paul A. Janavicius, Ramunas Jensen, Allan Johannsson, Oskar Th. John, Esther M. Jones, Michael E. Kang, Daehee Karlan, Beth Y. Karnezis, Anthony Kelemen, Linda E. Khusnutdinova, Elza Kiemeney, Lambertus A. Kim, Byoung-Gie Kjaer, Susanne K. Komenaka, Ian Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta Kurian, Allison W. Kwong, Ava Lambrechts, Diether Larson, Melissa C. Lazaro, Conxi L University of Cambridge Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology Department of Public Health and Primary Care Cambridge UK University of Cambridge Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology Department of Oncology Cambridge UK Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles CA USA Radboud University Medical Center Radboud Institute for Health Sciences Nijmegen The Netherlands Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation Utrecht The Netherlands The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital Family Cancer Clinic Amsterdam The Netherlands Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV—IRCCS Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit Padua Italy Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer Genetics Toronto ON Canada University of Toronto Department of Molecular Genetics Toronto ON Canada University of California Irvine Department of Epidemiology Genetic Epidemiology Research Institute Irvine CA USA N.N. Alexandrov Research Institute of Oncology and Medical Radiology Minsk Belarus ‘Agii Anargiri’ Cancer Hospital Athens Greece University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Department of Breast Medical Oncology Houston TX USA Lund University Department of Cancer Epidemiology Clinical Sciences Lund Sweden Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology Hereditary cancer Genetics Group Barcelona Spain University Hospital of Vall d’Hebron Department of Medical Oncology Barcelona Spain Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey Cancer Prevention and Control Program New Brunswick NJ USA Landspitali University Hospital Department of Pathology Reykjavik Iceland University of Iceland BMC (Biomedical Centre) Faculty of Medicine Reykjavik Iceland University Hospital Erlangen Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Comprehensive Cancer Center ER-EMN Erlangen Germany Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Division of Epidemiology Department

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) have the potential to improve risk stratification. Joint estimation of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) effects in models could improve predictive performance over standard approaches of PRS construction. Here, we implemented computationally efficient, penalized, logistic regression models (lasso, elastic net, stepwise) to individual level genotype data and a Bayesian framework with continuous shrinkage, “select and shrink for summary statistics” (S4), to summary level data for epithelial non-mucinous ovarian cancer risk prediction. We developed the models in a dataset consisting of 23,564 non-mucinous EOC cases and 40,138 controls participating in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC) and validated the best models in three populations of different ancestries: prospective data from 198,101 women of European ancestries; 7,669 women of East Asian ancestries; 1,072 women of African ancestries, and in 18,915 BRCA1 and 12,337 BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers of European ancestries. In the external validation data, the model with the strongest association for non-mucinous EOC risk derived from the OCAC model development data was the S4 model (27,240 SNPs) with odds ratios (OR) of 1.38 (95% CI: 1.28–1.48, AUC: 0.588) per unit standard deviation, in women of European ancestries; 1.14 (95% CI: 1.08–1.19, AUC: 0.538) in women of East Asian ancestries; 1.38 (95% CI: 1.21–1.58, AUC: 0.593) in women of African ancestries; hazard ratios of 1.36 (95% CI: 1.29–1.43, AUC: 0.592) in BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers and 1.49 (95% CI: 1.35–1.64, AUC: 0.624) in BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers. Incorporation of the S4 PRS in risk prediction models for ovarian cancer may have clinical utility in ovarian cancer prevention programs.

关键词： Clinical genetics Genetic markers Risk factors Biomedicine general Human Genetics Bioinformatics Gene Expression Cytogenetics

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Comparative cellular analysis of motor cortex in human, marmoset and mouse (vol 598, pg 111, 2021)

引用

NATURE 2022年第7904期604卷 E8-E8页

作者： Bakken, Trygve E. Jorstad, Nikolas L. Hu, Qiwen Lake, Blue B. Tian, Wei Kalmbach, Brian E. Crow, Megan Hodge, Rebecca D. Krienen, Fenna M. Sorensen, Staci A. Eggermont, Jeroen Yao, Zizhen Aevermann, Brian D. Aldridge, Andrew I. Bartlett, Anna Bertagnolli, Darren Casper, Tamara Castanon, Rosa G. Crichton, Kirsten Daigle, Tanya L. Dalley, Rachel Dee, Nick Dembrow, Nikolai Diep, Dinh Ding, Song-Lin Dong, Weixiu Fang, Rongxin Fischer, Stephan Goldman, Melissa Goldy, Jeff Graybuck, Lucas T. Herb, Brian R. Hou, Xiaomeng Kancherla, Jayaram Kroll, Matthew Lathia, Kanan van Lew, Baldur Li, Yang Eric Liu, Christine S. Liu, Hanqing Lucero, Jacinta D. Mahurkar, Anup McMillen, Delissa Miller, Jeremy A. Moussa, Marmar Nery, Joseph R. Nicovich, Philip R. Niu, Sheng-Yong Orvis, Joshua Osteen, Julia K. Owen, Scott Palmer, Carter R. Pham, Thanh Plongthongkum, Nongluk Poirion, Olivier Reed, Nora M. Rimorin, Christine Rivkin, Angeline Romanow, William J. Sedeno-Cortes, Adriana E. Siletti, Kimberly Somasundaram, Saroja Sulc, Josef Tieu, Michael Torkelson, Amy Tung, Herman Wang, Xinxin Xie, Fangming Yanny, Anna Marie Zhang, Renee Ament, Seth A. Behrens, M. Margarita Bravo, Hector Corrada Chun, Jerold Dobin, Alexander Gillis, Jesse Hertzano, Ronna Hof, Patrick R. Hollt, Thomas Horwitz, Gregory D. Keene, C. Dirk Kharchenko, Peter V. Ko, Andrew L. Lelieveldt, Boudewijn P. Luo, Chongyuan Mukamel, Eran A. Pinto-Duarte, Antonio Preiss, Sebastian Regev, Aviv Ren, Bing Scheuermann, Richard H. Smith, Kimberly Spain, William J. White, Owen R. Koch, Christof Hawrylycz, Michael Tasic, Bosiljka Macosko, Evan Z. McCarroll, Steven A. Ting, Jonathan T. Zeng, Hongkui Zhang, Kun Feng, Guoping Ecker, Joseph R. Linnarsson, Sten Lein, Ed S. Allen Institute for Brain Science Seattle WA USA Department of Physiology and Biophysics University of Washington Seattle WA USA Department of Biomedical Informatics Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA Department of Bioengineering University of California San Diego La Jolla CA USA The Salk Institute for Biological Studies La Jolla CA USA Epilepsy Center of Excellence Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center Seattle WA USA Stanley Institute for Cognitive Genomics Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cold Spring Harbor NY USA Department of Genetics Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard Cambridge MA USA LKEB Department of Radiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands Pattern Recognition and Bioinformatics group Delft University of Technology Delft The Netherlands J. Craig Venter Institute La Jolla CA USA Department of Pathology University of California San Diego CA USA Division of Vaccine Discovery La Jolla Institute for Immunology La Jolla CA USA Genomic Analysis Laboratory The Salk Institute for Biological Studies La Jolla CA USA Computer Science and Engineering Program University of California San Diego La Jolla CA USA Howard Hughes Medical Institute The Salk Institute for Biological Studies La Jolla CA USA Bioinformatics and Systems Biology Graduate Program University of California San Diego La Jolla CA USA Institute for Genomes Sciences University of Maryland School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA Center for Epigenomics Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine University of California San Diego La Jolla CA USA Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research La Jolla CA USA Department of Computer Science University of Maryland College Park College Park MD USA Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute La Jolla CA USA Biomedical Sciences Program School of Medicine University of California San Diego La Jolla CA USA University of Connecticut Storrs CT USA Department

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

No increased risk of dementia in patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer： a 5-year follow-up study

引用

Asian Journal of Andrology 2017年第4期19卷 414-417页

作者： Li-Ting Kao Herng-Ching Lin Shiu-Dong Chung Chao-Yuan Huang Graduate Institute of Life Science National Defense Medical Center Taipei 110 Taiwan China Sleep Research Center Taipei Medical University Hospital Taipei 110 Taiwan China Division of Urology Department of Surgery Far Eastern Memorial Hospital Taipei 110 Taiwan China Graduate Program in Biomedical Informatics College of Informatics Yuan Ze University Chung Li 320 Taiwan China Department of Urology National Taiwan University Hospital College of Medicine National Taiwan University Taipei 110 Taiwan China School of Public Health Taipei Medical University Taipei 110 Taiwan China

Prior studies suggested that the use of androgen deprivation therapy （ADT） in patients with prostate cancer （PC） might cause the impairment of cognitive function which is one of the common symptoms of dementia; however, the association between ADT and cognitive impairment still remains controversial. This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the relationship between ADT and subsequent risk of dementia using a population-based dataset, Data for this study were taken from the Taiwan （China） Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2005. We included 755 PC patients who received ADT in the study cohort and 559 PC patients who did not receive ADT in the comparison cohort. Each patient was individually tracked for a 5-year period to define those who subsequently received a diagnosis of dementia. Results show that the incidence rates of dementia per 100 person-years were 2.35 （95% confidence interval [95% CI]： 1.82-2.98） and 1.85 （95% Ch 1.35-2.48） for PC patients who received ADT and those who did not receive ADT, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio （HR） for dementia for PC patients who received ADT was 1.21 （95% Ch 0.82-1.78, P = 0,333） compared to those who did not receive ADT. In addition, the adjusted HRs for dementia for PC patients receiving ADT with gonadotropin-releasing hormone （GnRH） agonists and without GnRH agonists were 1.39 （95% Ch 0.80-2.40, P = 0.240） and 1.13 （95% CI： 0.75-1.71, P = 0.564）, respectively, compared to PC patients not receiving ADT. We concluded that there was no difference in the risk of subsequent dementia between PC patients who did and those who did not receive ADT.

关键词： androgen deprivation therapy dementia epidemiology prostate cancer

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Considering discrepancy when calibrating a mechanistic electrophysiology model

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2020年

作者： Lei, Chon Lok Ghosh, Sanmitra Whittaker, Dominic G. Aboelkassem, Yasser Beattie, Kylie A. Cantwell, Chris D. Delhaas, Tammo Houston, Charles Novaes, Gustavo Montes Panfilov, Alexander V. Pathmanathan, Pras Riabiz, Marina Weber dos Santos, Rodrigo Worden, Keith Mirams, Gary R. Wilkinson, Richard D. Computational Biology & Health Informatics Dept. of Computer Science University of Oxford United Kingdom MRC Biostatistics Unit University of Cambridge United Kingdom Centre for Mathematical Medicine & Biology School of Mathematical Sciences University of Nottingham United Kingdom Department of Bioengineering University of California San Diego United States Systems Modeling and Translational Biology GlaxoSmithKline R&D Stevenage United Kingdom ElectroCardioMaths Programme Centre for Cardiac Engineering Imperial College London United Kingdom CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases Maastricht University Netherlands Graduate Program in Computational Modeling Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora Brazil Department of Physics and Astronomy Ghent University Belgium Laboratory of Computational Biology and Medicine Ural Federal University Ekaterinburg Russia U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories United States Department of Biomedical Engineering King’s College London Alan Turing Institute United Kingdom Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield United Kingdom School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sheffield United Kingdom

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is a vital step in using mathematical models and simulations to take decisions. The field of cardiac simulation has begun to explore and adopt UQ methods to characterise uncertainty in model inputs and how that propagates through to outputs or predictions. In this perspective piece we draw attention to an important and under-addressed source of uncertainty in our predictions — that of uncertainty in the model structure or the equations themselves. The difference between imperfect models and reality is termed model discrepancy, and we are often uncertain as to the size and consequences of this discrepancy. Here we provide two examples of the consequences of discrepancy when calibrating models at the ion channel and action potential scales. Furthermore, we attempt to account for this discrepancy when calibrating and validating an ion channel model using different methods, based on modelling the discrepancy using Gaussian processes (GPs) and autoregressive-moving-average (ARMA) models, then highlight the advantages and shortcomings of each approach. Finally, suggestions and lines of enquiry for future work are provided. Copyright © 2020, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Uncertainty analysis

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Correction: How Can Artificial Intelligence Make Medicine More Preemptive?

引用

Journal of medical Internet research 2020年第8期22卷 e23645页

作者： Usman Iqbal Leo Anthony Celi Yu-Chuan Jack Li Master Program in Global Health & Development PhD Program in Global Health & Health Security College of Public Health Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan. International Center for Health Information Technology Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan. Laboratory for Computational Physiology Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA United States. Division of Pulmonary Critical Care and Sleep Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston MA United States. Department of Biostatistics Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health Harvard University Boston MA United States. Graduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics College of Medical Science and Technology Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan. Department of Dermatology Taipei Municipal Wan-Fang Hospital Taipei Taiwan. International Medical Informatics Association Geneva Switzerland.

[This corrects the article DOI: .].

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Correction: A COVID-19 Pandemic Artificial Intelligence-Based System With Deep Learning Forecasting and Automatic Statistical Data Acquisition: Development and Implementation Study

引用

Journal of medical Internet research 2021年第7期23卷 e31085页

作者： Cheng-Sheng Yu Shy-Shin Chang Tzu-Hao Chang Jenny L Wu Yu-Jiun Lin Hsiung-Fei Chien Ray-Jade Chen Department of Family Medicine School of Medicine College of Medicine Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan. Department of Family Medicine Taipei Medical University Hospital Taipei Taiwan. Graduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics College of Medical Science and Technology Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan. Professional Master Program in Artificial Intelligence in Medicine College of Medicine Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan. Clinical Big Data Research Center Taipei Medical University Hospital Taipei Taiwan. Division of Plastic Surgery Department of Surgery Taipei Medical University Hospital and School of Medicine College of Medicine Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan. Department of Surgery School of Medicine College of Medicine Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan. Division of General Surgery Department of Surgery Taipei Medical University Hospital Taipei Taiwan.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.2196/27806.].

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Correction to: binomialRF: interpretable combinatoric efficiency of random forests to identify biomarker interactions

引用

BMC bioinformatics 2020年第1期21卷 495页

作者： Samir Rachid Zaim Colleen Kenost Joanne Berghout Wesley Chiu Liam Wilson Hao Helen Zhang Yves A Lussier Center for Biomedical Informatics and Biostatistics University of Arizona Health Sciences 1230 N. Cherry Ave Tucson AZ 85721 USA. The Graduate Interdisciplinary Program in Statistics The University of Arizona 617 N. Santa Rita Ave Tucson AZ 85721 USA. College of Medicine Tucson 1501 N. Campbell Ave Tucson AZ 85721 USA. Center for Biomedical Informatics and Biostatistics University of Arizona Health Sciences 1230 N. Cherry Ave Tucson AZ 85721 USA. hzhang@math.arizona.edu. The Graduate Interdisciplinary Program in Statistics The University of Arizona 617 N. Santa Rita Ave Tucson AZ 85721 USA. hzhang@math.arizona.edu. Department of Mathematics College of Sciences The University of Arizona 617 N. Santa Rita Ave Tucson AZ 85721 USA. hzhang@math.arizona.edu. Center for Biomedical Informatics and Biostatistics University of Arizona Health Sciences 1230 N. Cherry Ave Tucson AZ 85721 USA. Lussier.Y@***. The Graduate Interdisciplinary Program in Statistics The University of Arizona 617 N. Santa Rita Ave Tucson AZ 85721 USA. Lussier.Y@***. College of Medicine Tucson 1501 N. Campbell Ave Tucson AZ 85721 USA. Lussier.Y@***. The Center for Applied Genetic and Genomic Medicine 1295 N. Martin Tucson AZ 85721 USA. Lussier.Y@***. The University of Arizona Cancer Center 3838 N. Campbell Ave Tucson AZ 85721 USA. Lussier.Y@***. The University of Arizona BIO5 Institute 1657 E. Helen Street Tucson AZ 85721 USA. Lussier.Y@***.

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：