检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

SWATH—THE VSTOL AIRCRAFT CARRIER FOR THE POST‐1990's

Naval Engineers Journal 1977年第1期89卷 47-54页

作者： CHILDERS, RADM.K.C. GLOECKLER, FREDERICK M. STEVENS, ROBERT M. USN (RET.) RAdm. K.C. Childers USN (Ret.):graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy in 1939. and later completed his graduate studies at California Institute of Technology from which he received his MS and AE degrees. He was a fighter pilot in the aircraft carriers USS Ranger and USS Essex during World War II and an instructor at the Guided Missile School. Ft. Bliss Texas from 1947 until 1949 at which time he came to Washington. D.C. as an Assistant Division Director Ships Installation Division Bureau of Aeronautics. In addition his active duty career included assignments as Naval Air Systems Command Representative Atlantic Assistant Commander for Material Acquisition Naval Air Systems Command and Deputy Project Manager for the FlllB/Phoenix Program. Bureau of Naval Weapons. During the first five years of the Polaris Program he was responsible for all testing at the Atlantic Missile Range. He also served as Commander of the Naval Missile Center where he directed the test and evaluation of Airborne Weapon Systems and had been on an earlier assignment the Missile Test Officer. His military decorations include the Silver Star the Legion of Merit two Air Medals the Navy Commendation Medal and a Presidential Unit Citation. Currently he is employed as the Manager of the Analysis and Evaluation Department at CERBERONICS. Inc. Falls Church. Va. Mr. Frederick M. Gloeckler: currently a Consultant to CERBERONICS Inc. graduated from New York University from which he received his BS degree. He began his career with the Department of the Navy in 1938. and culminated it with his retirement in 1972 at which time he was engaged in VSTOL aircraft analysis and was the Director Advanced Systems Division Naval Air Systems Command (and its predecessor organizations). During this period he made major contributions to the Fleet Ballistic Missile Program the F-14 A-7 and S-3 Aircraft Programs and the Phoenix Condor and Harpoon Missile Programs. In 1951 Mr. Gloeckler organized‘ and directed the Systems Engineering Divis

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OF OCEANS

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1976年第1期88卷 21-26页

作者： SONENSHEIN, N USN (RET.) The Author graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy in the Class of 1938. His work has included instruction in Naval Construction and Marine Engineering at Massachusetts Institute of Technology which lead to his MS degree in 1944 and in the Advanced Management Program at Harvard Graduate School in 1964. As an Engineering Duty Officer (ED) he has served in various Navy commands including Mare Island and New York Naval Shipyards USS Philippine Sea (CVA-47) during the Korean conflict as Chief Engineer and on the Staffs of both the Commander-in-Chief and the Commander Service Force U.S. Pacific Fleet as Fleet and Force Maintenance Officer. Within the Naval Ship Systems Command and its predecessor Bureau of Ships his duties included those of Director Facilities Division Head Hull Design Branch Director Ship Design Division Assistant Chief for Design Shipbuilding and Fleet Maintenance and from 1969 to 1972 as Commander Naval Ship Systems Command. Other assignments have included Project Manager for the Navy's Fast Deployment Logistic Ship Project from 1965 to 1967 Deputy Chief of Naval Material for Logistic Support from 1967 to 1969 and Chairman Naval Material Command Shipbuilding Council which commenced upon completion of his tour as Commander Naval Ships Systems Command in 1972. On 4 September 1973 he was appointed Director of the Defense Energy Task Group (DETG) and subsequently on 15 November 1973 as Director of Energy for the Department of Defense. Upon his retirement from the naval service in November 1974 he became Assistant to the President Global Marine Development Inc. based in Newport Beach Calif. A former President of ASNE from 1970 to 1971 he is currently the Vice-President of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers. In addition he is a member of the honorary engineering society Sigma Xi and listed among those named in “Who's Who in America.”

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

MANAGEMENT OF SHIP design AT NAVAL SHIP ENGINEERING CENTER

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1976年第1期88卷 27-44页

作者： SPAULDING, KB JOHNSON, AF Mr. Ken B. Spaulding Jr.:following graduation from Webb Institute was Fiberglass Hull Shipbuilding Inspector from 1954 to 1956 with RESUPSHIP Bay City Michigan (Defoe Shipbuilding) where he monitored the construction of a 57 ft. fiberglass MSB then as of 1956 the largest fiberglass hull in the world. In 1956 he left Michigan to join the Boats and Small Craft Branch in BUSHIPS working initially in fiberglass hull structures and advancing gradually to Head Boat Contract Design Section in 1956. In 1967 he shifted to the position of Head Boat Preliminary Design Section and then for two and one-half years following the transfer fo the Boat Design function to NAVSEC NORDIV was the Headquarters Coordinator for all boat work and for the PG's Hydrofoil Craft and the Advanced Landing Craft Programs until January 1970 when he became Assistant for Management and Planning of the TRIDENT Project. This was followed by a two year assignment as Deputy Ship Design Manager on the PF Design Project one year as Assistant for Design Planning and Control Procedures and currently as NAVSEC Design Manager for the Amphibious Assault Landing Craft Program. Mr. Spaulding who has had papers on fiberglass and other hull materials published by SNAME Society of the Plastics Industry FAO Naval Engineers Journal and Naval Institute Proceedings as well as a small craft construction text prepared for a University of Michigan Seminar received his Masters degree in R&D Management and M.I.S. from the American University in the Spring of 1974. His principal affiliation is with the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers where he served six years on the FRP and Planing Boat Task Groups. Mr. Anthony F. Johnson:joined the Bureau of Ships in 1958 as a Gas Turbine Project Engineer. In 1963 he transferred to the Propulsion Systems Analysis Branch as a Project Engineer in the Combatant Ships Section where he served until his assignment as Head of the Mine Service Patrol & Craft Section in 1967: In December 1970 he became

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

THE UNITED STATES NAVY'S “design WORK STUDY” APPROACH TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF SHIPBOARD CONTROL SYSTEMS

引用

Naval Engineers Journal 1976年第6期88卷 62-74页

作者： PLATO, ARTIS I. GAMBREL, WILLIAM DAVID Artis I. Plato:is Head of the Design Work Study/ Shipboard Manning/Human Factors Engineering Section Systems Engineering and Analysis Branch Naval Ship Engineering Center (NAVSEC). He graduated from the City College of New York in 1956 receiving his Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering degree. Following this he started work at the New York Naval Shipyard in the Internal Combustion Engine and Cargo Elevator Section. During 1957 and 1958 he was called up for active duty with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and served in Europe with a Construction Engineer Battalion. After release from active duty he returned to the shipyard where he remained until 1961 when he transferred to the Naval Supply Research and Development Facility Bayonne New Jersey. Initially he was in charge of an Engineering Support Test Group and the drafting services for the whole Facility. Later he became a Project Engineer in the Food Services Facilities Branch with duties that included planning and designing new afloat and ashore messing facilities for the Navy. In 1966 he transferred to NAVSEC as a Project Engineer in the Design Work Study Section and in this capacity worked on selected projects and manning problems for new construction and also developed a computer program (Manpower Determination Model) that makes accurate crew predictions for feasibility studies. In 1969 he became Head of the Section. He has been active in the U.S. Army Reserve since his release from active duty and his duties have included command of an Engineer Company various Staff positions and his present assignment as Operations Officer for a Civil Affairs Group. He has completed the U. S. A rmy Corps of Engineers Career Course and the Civil Affairs Career Course and is presently enrolled in the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College non-resident course. Additionally he completed graduate studies at American University Washington D.C in 1972 receiving his MSTM degree in Technology of Management and is a member of ASE ASME CAA U. S. Naval Instit

The purpose of this paper is to discuss a system analysis technique called “design Work Study”, that is used by the U.S. Navy for the development of improved ship control systems. The design Work Study approach is one which brings about the most efficient and cost effective man‐machine combination for the ship control functions. Adherence to this process insures that the advantages of automation are balanced against incurred operational and maintenance expense. At present, U.S. Navy doctrine requires that certain ship operating stations, such as steering and propulsion control, be manned at specified ship conditions of readiness. Therefore, if personnel are needed to fulfill these combat environment obligations, excessive automation may only result in unnecessary additional acquisition costs and increased personnel skill requirements. The design Work Study process can be applied to establish the required fine balance between the degree of built‐in automation and the shipboard manpower levels. In order to explain the techniques that are used for this process, the Authors will present a brief summary of the design Work Study approach for optimizing shipboard control systems, including an explanation of the formal procedural tools that are applicable. In addition, a practical case study of ship control system design for one of the latest classes of Navy destroyers will be presented. This example will illustrate the resultant savings and benefits that can be realized by a judicious application of this technique. © 1976 American Society of Naval Engineers

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

ARGE SHALLOW DRAFT BULK CARRIER TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

引用

Naval Engineers Journal 1976年第5期88卷 35-42页

作者： BAKI, AMOS CHRISTENSEN, ROBERT G. Mr. Amos Baki:Manager of Ship Design and Marine Economics. Washington D.C. Branch M. Rosenblatt & Son Inc. since 1973 graduated from the University of Stratclyde Glasgow Scotland in 1966 receiving his BS degree in Naval Architecture and subsequent thereto took graduate studies in Business Administration (Finance & Economics) at Temple University in 1971. In his present position he is responsible for the technical and administrative supervision of conceptual feasibility contract and detail design tasks including direct liaison with clients and subcontractors preparation of proposals cost estimates and research work in ship and shipping economics. In this capacity one of his many technical assignments has been as Assistant Project Manager and Leading Research Engineer on the Maritime Administration's “Large Shallow Draft Bulk Carrier Technology Assessment.” Prior to joining M. Rosenblatt & Son Inc. he was employed at Litton Ship Systems (1971–73) as Chief of the Ship System Economic Section at Sun Shipbuilding & Drydock Co. (1968–71) as Senior Research Engineer and at Furness Shipbuilding Co. Ltd. in England (1966–68) as a Computer Section Leader. In addition to ASNE he is a member of SNAME and an associate member of the Royal Institute of Naval Architecture. Mr. Robert G. Christensen:Program Manager for Market Analysis Office of Marine Technology U.S. Maritime Administration was born in New Orleans La. in 1941. He graduated from Louisiana State University in 1964 receiving his BS degree as a major in Mathematics and Business and later attended American University from which he received his MS degree in Operations Research and R&D Management in 1973. A licensed Purser in the Merchant Marine Service he has been employed by the Maritime Administration since 1967 and in his present position is responsible for assisting U.S. shipbuilders and ship operators in the definition of market requirements and the assessment of market opportunities. In this his principal efforts have been concentra

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

THE FT9 MARINE GAS TURBINE ENGINE DEVELOPMENT program

引用

Naval Engineers Journal 1975年第6期87卷 79-96页

作者： FAIRBANKS, JOHN W. The author is a graduate of the Maine Maritime Academy Stanford University and the University of Santa Clara. His undergraduate degrees were in Marine and Mechanical Engineering and his Masters Degree Specialization was in Heat-Mass-Momentum Transfer within the Mechanical Engineering Department He has taught Gas Dynamics Thermodynamics and Direct Energy Conversion at Texas A&M and the University of Maryland and has sailed as a licensed Marine Engineer for two and a half years with the American Export Lines currently holding active First Assistant Steam Unlimited and Third Assistant Diesel Unlimited licenses. From 1954 to 1957 he was on active duty in the U.S. Navy serving in the USS Montrose (APA-212) as both Main Propulsion Assistant and Chief Engineer. While employed at Hiller Aircraft Company he was in the Advanced Research Group and worked on the Detached Coanda Effect for VTOL and ground effect machines as well as designing high-speed bearings and high-speed shaft test stands for the SC-142A an experimental tilt wing aircraft program. In 1963 he went to Philco-Ford to design a Brayton Cycle Power System for a solar probe spacecraft and also worked on the Thermal and Power System Design of the IDCSP (DOD's Communication Satellite). At NASA's Goddard Space Center for six years his responsibilities included design fabrication integration test launch and flight operation of solar arrays on two spacecraft and also as Power Systems Engineer for the Orbiting Astronomical Observatory the largest unmanned spacecraft flown. In 1971 he joined NAVSEC where he is currently the Program Engineer on the FT9 Gas Turbine Development Program and Coordinator of the Navy's Materials Programs for advanced gas turbines. Having organized the first two Navy Gas Turbine Materials Conferences he is presently organizing U.S. participation in a joint U.S. Navy Royal Navy Gas Turbine Materials Conference to be held in ‘the United Kingdom in September 1976. Mr. Fairbanks has authored or coauthored 21 technical papers and i

The current Navy philosophy for marine gas turbine engine development is to marinize an existing aircraft turbo jet engine. The FT9 Marine Gas Turbine Engine is a 33,000 horsepower version of the Pratt and Whitney JT9D engine, which powers the 747 aircraft. Marinization of the JT9D basically involves removal of the fan section, addition of a power turbine, structural modification to several components, and material changes to provide corrosion‐resistance in the marine environment. Characteristics and ratings of the individual engine components are discussed as well as the assembled engine. The FT9 design incorporates the modular replacement concept. Modular replacement permits replacement of short‐life components such as the hot‐section without removing the engine from its mounts. The FT9 specification requires development of a condition monitoring system as an integral part of the engine development. Thus, provisions for sensor installations are incorporated in the design. Accelerometers are installed on the internal engine bearing housings to provide improved vibration signals. These accelerometers are mounted on rods such that they are removable without engine disassembly. Extensive borescope provisions are included to provide capability to inspect all hot‐section components without disassembling the engine. The engine life‐limiting component is the hot‐section because of the susceptibility of the blade and vane materials to sulphidation/oxidation at the temperatures encountered with the advanced engines. Sophisticated Made and vane cooling is used to allow high turbine inlet temperatures while keeping blade metal temperatures in a region where sulphidation/oxidation is only moderately active. Coatings are added to blades and vanes to extend engine life. Three FT9 engines will be delivered to the Navy. The target date for provisional Service Approval of FT9 is mid‐1978. FT9 will provide the U.S. Navy with the most advanced marine gas turbine with the highest powe

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

THE ENERGY PROBLEM AND DEFENSE

引用

Naval Engineers Journal 1974年第1期86卷 19-27页

作者： SONENSHEIN, RADM. NATHAN USN The author graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy in the Class of 1938. His work has included instruction in Naval Construction and Marine Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology leading to a Master of Science degree in 1944 and the Advanced Management Program at Harvard Graduate School of Business in 1964. As an Engineering Duty Officer (EDO) he has served in various Navy commands including the Mare Island Naval Shipyard the former New York Naval Shipyard the USS Philippine Sea (CVA-47) during the Korean War as Chief Engineer and CINCPACFLT and COMSERVPAC Staffs as Fleet and Force Maintenance Officer. Within the Naval Ship Systems Command and its predecessor BUSHIPS his duties have included Director of the Facilities Division Head of the Hull Design Branch Director of the Ship Design Division Assistant Chief for Design Shipbuilding and Fleet Maintenance and as Commander Naval Ship Systems Command from 1969 until 1972. Other duties have included an assignment as the Project Manager for the Navy's Fast Deployment Logistic Ship Project from 1965 to 1967 Deputy Chief of Naval Material for Logistic Support from 1967 to 1969 and Chairman of the Naval Material Command Shipbuilding Council which commenced upon completion of his tour as Commander NAVSHIPS in 1972. On 4 September 1973 he was appointed Director of the Defense Energy Task Group (DETG) and subsequently on 15 November 1973 as Director of Energy for the Department of Defense. A former President of ASNE from 1970 to 1971 he is currently Vice-President of the American Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers. In addition he is a member of the honorary engineering society Sigma Xi and listed among those in Who's Who in America.

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

OPERATOR AND ENGINEER - PARTNERS IN NAVAL SHIP design

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1973年第3期85卷 33-48页

作者： GRAHAM, C THE AUTHOR is presently serving as the Engineering Officer of the USS Gridley (DLG-21). He reported to this billet in November 1971 and has made a deployment operating in the Gulf of Tonkin with the Seventh Fleet and has managed a distillate fuel conversion and a complex overhaul. Previous to this assignment he spent two years at the Naval Ship Engineering Center Hyattsville Md. serving as Assistant Design Manager for the DLGN 38 Project Design Manager for the PCE design NAVSEC Project Coordinator for the DD 963 Program and Director of a Comparative Naval Architecture Study. As an Ensign he served on two destroyers the USS Charles R. Ware (DD-865) and the USS Richard E. Byrd (DDG-23). He is a graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology where he received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering. He is an active member in ASNE and a frequent contributor to the Journal.

Today, due to the extreme complexity of modern naval ships, there is a need for the Ship designer and Ship Operator to work together as partners in designing combatant ships. The ship design process consists of a continual series of “trade off” decisions where one feature is balanced against another. The Ship designer (PRODUCER) and the Operator (CUSTOMER) must make these decisions together. This paper addresses a number of important design factors which the Engineer and Operator should keep in mind; namely, the meaning and cost of ship performance, the importance of life cycle cost, and the effect of the design spiral. Specific examples are cited explaining the impact that compromises between several performance features can have on a ship design. The message emphasized is that ship performance never comes cheaply and that the Engineer and Operator are in the best positions to make the difficult decisions necessary to produce a balanced ship design.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND design OF A CATAMARAN CROSS‐STRUCTURE BY THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD

引用

Naval Engineers Journal 1973年第1期85卷 33-42页

作者： MANSOUR, DR.A. FENTON, LCDR. PAUL H. Dr. A. Mansour an Associate Professor in the Department of Ocean Engineering at Massachusetts Institute of Technology received his Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Cairo in 1958 and his M.E. and Ph.D. degrees in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering from the University of California at Berkeley in 1962 and 1966 respectively. He has had field experience and design responsibilities for about six years in the Suez Canal Authority John J. McMullen Associates Inc. and M. Rosenblatt and Son Inc. and has been with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology for the past four years. During this period he contributed several technical papers and reports in the areas of structural mechanics sea loads finite element analysis of marine structures and probabilistic structural mechanics. He has been a consultant for several companies and organizations is a member of Sigma Xi and SNAME currently serving as a member of the latter's Stress Analysis and Strength of Structural Elements Panel. USN Lieutenant Commander Paul H. Fenton USN a 1964 graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy recently completed a graduate education program at M.I.T. in the field of Naval Construction and Engineering earning two degrees: Ocean Engineer and Master of Science in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering. He is presently assigned to the Charleston Naval Shipyard Charleston South Carolina and has had previous duty in the U.S.S. STICKELL (DD 888) and with the Naval Support Activity Saigon.

One of the problems encountered during the design of the ASR‐21 Catamaran is the determination of the effectiveness of the cross‐structure deck plating. In this paper, this problem is examined using the Finite Element Method. The behavior of a multicell box girder representing a catamaran cross‐structure is studied. Because of the relatively low length‐to‐breadth ratio of a typical catamaran cross‐structure, the deck plating effectiveness is found to be rather small. Parametric studies are performed, and curves of the effectiveness as a function of the relevant geometric and loading parameters are presented. These curves may be helpful in the early stages of new designs. © 1973 by the American Society of Naval Engineers

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

SYSTEMS EFFECTIVENESS IN THE UNITED STATES NAVY

引用

Naval Engineers Journal 1967年第6期79卷 961-971页

作者： AZIZ, ABDUL THE AUTHOR was born in East Pakistan on January 31 1932 received the Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Dacca University in Pakistan in 1952 and the Master of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Michigan State University in 1953. He did further graduate work at MIT Columbia and Johns Hopkins Universities and is now a candidate for the doctoral degree at the University of Maryland. He joined the Department of Navy in March 1966 with the Naval Ship Research and Development Center Annapolis Division where he worked on the MESA (Machinery Effectiveness Systems Analysis) Program sponsored by the Navy Ship Systems Command. The present paper is largely based on a 138-page report entitled “Systems Effectiveness in the United States Navy” on the works of the MESA Program. Currently he is assigned to the Naval Research Laboratory to provide inhouse engineering support in the development and analysis of systems and their components for the conduct of fundamental research in Astronomy and Astrophysics by the Laboratory. Prior to joining the Department of Navy he worked for General Electric Cdmpany in the analysis and development of large steam turbine components and for Burns & Roe Corporation in systems design and analysis for power plants both fossil powered and nuclear. With Burns & Roe he participated in the systems effectiveness analysis of the Army PM-3A nuclear power plant in the Antarctica. He received the United States citizenship in January 1966 is a member of the ASME and the U.S. Naval Institute.

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：