检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1988年第3期100卷 154-165页

作者： LI, ST LOGAN, JC ROCKWAY, JW Shing Ted Li:is a project manager in the Antenna and RF Systems Integration Branch Shipboard Systems Division Naval Ocean Systems Center San Diego Calif. Majoring in electrical engineering he graduated from Taipei Institute of Technology in Taiwan in 1958. He received the M.S. degree from the University of Tennessee in 1965 and the Ph.D. degree from Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta Ga. in 1974 both in electrical engineering. Dr. Li was employed by the Taiwan Power Company from 1958 to 1959 and again from 1961 to 1964. In the period of September 1959 to February 1961 he served as a second lieutenant in the Nationalist Chinese Army. From 1965 to 1969 he was a design engineer at the Eastern Engineering Company in Atlanta Ga. Since July 1974 he has been employed at the Naval Ocean Systems Center. His present interests include the areas of electromagnetic compatibility and advanced communication systems. Dr. Li is a member of Pi Mu Epsilon and Sigma Xi and is a registered professional engineer in Georgia. James C. Logan:is a project engineer in the Antenna and RF Systems Integration Branch Shipboard Systems Division Naval Ocean Systems Center San Diego Calif. He received the B.S. degree in 1967 and the M.S. degree in 1973 in electrical engineering from Syracuse University Syracuse N. Y. In the period 1967–1971 he served as a lieutenant in the U.S. Navy. He has been employed at the Naval Ocean Systems Center since 1973. During this period of time he has been active in the development of numerical modeling techniques applicable to Cosite HF VHF and UHF antennas. John W. Rockway:is a senior technical staff member in the Communications Department Naval Ocean Systems Center San Diego Calif. He received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering from Washington State University Pullman Wash in 1966 and 1968 respectively. He received the Ph.D. degree in engineering science in 1971. Currently he is employed in the Communications Department of the Naval Ocean Systems Center. His prese

This paper describes the design procedure and engineering design tools used for Navy shipboard exterior RF communication system design. The approach is an iterative process by which candidate RF system designs can be analyzed to determine their relative desirability. Several computer codes have been developed for designing the exterior RF communication systems for Navy ships. The software design aids consist of two packages, one for antenna modeling (such as the NEC-Method of Moments, NEC-Basic Scattering, and NEC-Reflector antenna codes), and another for communication systems analysis (such as DECAL, PECAL, LINCAL, and COSAM II). These codes have been well documented, validated, and applied successfully to design and integrate a number of shipboard exterior communication and topside antenna systems. However, there exist two shortcomings: (1) lack of a user friendly interface, and (2) lack of the ability to enforce design discipline and completeness. The Naval Ocean System Center recognized these shortcomings and has initiated the development of engineering workstations such as the Interactive Graphic Utility Automated for Numerical Electromagnetic Code (NEC) Analysis (IGUANA), the Numerical Electromagnetics engineering Design System (NEEDS), and the Communication engineering Design System (COEDS).

关键词： NAVAL VESSELS

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

SIMPLIFICATION OF GAS-TURBINE INTAKE ANTI-ICE SYSTEMS

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1988年第1期100卷 45-52页

作者： EXELL, JR KILLINGER, A LCdr. John R. Excell: USN received a bachelor of architecture from the University of Michigan and a master of science degree in mechanical engineering from the U. S. Navy Postgraduate School. He was commissioned in 1973 serving first as damage control assistant aboard USSGuadalcanal(LPH-7) and later as commissioning main propulsion assistant on USSMerrill(DD-976). He became an engineering duty officer in 1979 and served at Norfolk Naval Shipyard as senior ship superintendent for six ships and later within the shipyard Design Department. In May 1984 LCdr. Exell was assigned to the DD-963 Class Special Projects Office as program manager for air system improvements including the bleed air and anti-ice systems. He recently completed the Defense Systems Management College Ft. Belvoir VA and returned to NavSea PMS 377 as deputy for strategic sealift programs. Arthur Killinger:graduated from the University of Maryland in 1968 with a bachelor of science degree in mechanical engineering. He joined MPR Associates Inc. working on submarine safety design reviews following the loss of USSScorpion(SSN 589). After two years in the U.S. Army Nuclear Reactor Program and a year as U.S. Army engineer maintenance advisor in the Republic of Vietnam he returned to MPR Associates Inc. in 1972. Since then he has worked on nuclear power plant projects for several electric utilities as well as submarine and surface ship overhaul and maintenance improvement programs for the U.S. Navy. Mr. Killinger is a member of the American Society of Naval Engineers and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

This paper describes the steps taken to simplify the gas turbine intake anti-ice systems on DD-963 and DDG-993 class ships. The anti-ice system was designed and built as fully-automatic protection against intake duct icing on main propulsion turbines and electric generator turbines. Operating experience with the system indicated that it was nonfunctional more than 60% of the time. The system's poor availability was caused by its complexity, lack of use, lack of spare parts, poor training and documentation, and design and material problems. A Navy Independent Design Review Team (IDRT) reexamined the technical bases for installing an automatic anti-ice system and demonstrated that automatic control was not necessary for gas turbine intake duct anti-icing. A series of design review calculations and shipboard tests confirmed that anti-icing protection could be provided by manual control of installed butterfly valves feeding hot air to each turbine intake. The time from the IDRT design simplification recommendations to the first modification of the anti-ice system was less than one year. To date, half of the 30 of the 35 ships in the two classes have been modified. This system simplification will result in life cycle maintenance cost savings in excess of 13 million dollars. Future CG-47 class and DDG-51 class ships will include this simplified approach to anti-ice system design for gas turbine intakes.

关键词： GAS TURBINES

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

NTDS - A PAGE IN NAVAL HISTORY

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1988年第3期100卷 53-61页

作者： SWENSON, EN MAHINSKE, EB STOUTENBURGH, JS Capt. Erick N. Swenson USNR (Ret.):is a project manager for special projects in the Surface Ship Systems Division Hughes Aircraft Company Fullerton Calif where he has been employed since his retirement from the U.S. Navy in 1975. Originally trained as an electronics technician during WWII in the Captain Eddy program he later received a BS degree in electrical engineering from the University of Rochester Rochester N. Y. in 1950. Subsequent engineering education was received at the University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Penn. and the Naval Postgraduate School Monterey Calif. After commissioning he was ordered to duty as the electronics division officer on the USSMissouri(BB-63) and electronics ships superintendent at Hunters Point Naval Shipyard San Francisco Calif. When the design of the Naval Tactical Data System began in the mid-1950s Lt. (j.g.) Swenson was ordered to the Bureau of Ships Navy Department Washington D.C. as the junior engineering duty only officer assigned to the project. From 1962 to 1965 LCdr. Swenson was assigned as the BuShips technical representative on the program at Remington Rand Univac St. Paul Minn. For the next ten years he returned to BuShips/NavSea/NAVSEC as the NTDS project officer. During this time the project expanded considerably foreign military sales were heavily involved and interoperability with other services and countries were established. His final effort on active duty was to instigate the redesign of the previousSpruanceclass destroyers into the newerAdmiral Kiddclass improvement program. He is a registered professional electrical engineer in the State of California listed inWho's Who in the Worldis a life member of ASNE and chairman of the Long Beach/Greater LA Section. Capt. Edmund B. Mahinske USN (Ret.):is an alumnus of the U.S. Naval Academy the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Harvard Business School. His technical background is in electronics and he specialized in the management of programs involving the application of comp

A little over thirty years ago, a group of naval engineers were assembled by the Bureau of Ships to develop a new system approach to the combat information center (CIC). The CIC of World War II, with its “grease pencil” plots and voice telling of tactical information from sensors and other ships, could no longer provide the timely, coordinated reaction to postwar threats. This project group led the Navy into the new world of large-scale, high-speed digital electronics and into a new mode of conducting naval warfare as well. There were no off-the-shelf computers of the requisite capability, size and reliability; what were available were monstrous vacuum tube computers. There were no display equipments that were “conversant” in both the digital language of the computer and the analog language of the sensors and the weapon systems. Who ever heard, at that time, of a computer running a tactical communication net automatically? It was hard enough to find sufficient numbers of engineers who knew what a digital computer was. This paper, by three naval engineers in the implementing engineering office, depicts the evolvement of the Naval Tactical Data Systems (NTDS) as they saw it. It discusses the problems that stemmed from the transition from the old world of analog into the new digital world, the system concepts that steered the development; the key decisions that were made; new electronic equipment and processes that became necessary; and the need of the mangagement to face the real world of deadlines, ship schedules and operational requirements.

关键词： NAVAL WARFARE

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

MASTER ORDNANCE REPAIR APPLIED - STANDARD ITEM 009-67

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1986年第3期98卷 35-42页

作者： STIMSON, WA MARSH, MT UTTICH, RM William A. Stimsonreceived his B.S. degree in mathematics from the University of Texas at El Paso in 1964 and his M.S. degree in engineering from the University of Santa Clara in 1971. He served in the U.S. Army Artillery during the Korean Conflict and subsequently was employed at IBM Huntsville Alabama until 1968 where he worked in the design of automatic control systems of the Saturn vehicle. From 1968 until 1971 he was employed at Ames Research Center Moffett Field in the design of nonlinear control systems for sounding rockets and pencil-shaped spacecraft. Following this Mr. Stimson worked at Hewlett Packard Sunnyvale California as a test engineer in automatic test systems. Since 1973 Mr. Stimson has been employed at the Naval Ship Weapon Systems Engineering Station Port Hueneme. He was a ship qualification trials project supervisor for many years and is now serving as master ordnance repair deputy program manager. Mr. Stimson is a member of the American Society of Naval Engineers and is program chairman of the Channel Islands Section. Cdr. Michael T. Marsh USNreceived a B.S. in mathematics from the University of Nebraska and was commissioned via the NESEP program in 1970. He holds an M.S. in computer science from the U.S. Navy Postgraduate School and an MBA from the State University of New York. Cdr. Marsh has served in the weapons department of USSFrancis Hammond (FF-1067) and of USSJohn S. McCain (DDG-36). He was weapons officer aboard USSSampson (DDG-10). As an engineering duty officer Cdr. Marsh was the technical design officer for PMS-399 at the FFG-7 Class Combat System Test Center from 1978 to 1982. He is presently combat system officer at SupShip Jacksonville and has been active in the MOR program since its inception. Cdr. Marsh is also the vice chairman of the Jacksonville Section of ASNE. LCdr. Richard M. Uttich USNholds B.S. and M.S. degrees in mechanical engineering from Stanford University. He enlisted in the Navy in 1965 serving as an electronics technician aboard USSNereus (A

The 600-ship United States Navy offers private shipyards an unprecedented opportunity for overhaul of surface combatants with complex combat systems. Recognizing the new challenge associated with the overhaul of high technology combat systems in the private sector, the Navy in 1983 established the master ordnance repair (MOR) program. This program, a joint effort of the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) and the Shipbuilders Council of America (SCA), was designed to identify and qualify those companies and private shipyards technically capable of managing combat systems work and conducting combat system testing. Standard Item 009–67 describes the role of the MOR company in combat system overhaul. It defines terms that are important to understanding the item itself, and imposes upon the prime contractor an obligation to utilize the MOR subcontractor in a managerial capacity. Specific tasks are assigned to the MOR company in planning, production, and testing. Finally, this standard item describes to the Navy planner how to estimate the size of the MOR team appropriate to the work package, a feature that will ensure that combat system bids are tailored to a specific availability.

关键词： WARSHIPS

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

WARSHIPS AND COST CONSTRAINTS

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1986年第2期98卷 41-52页

作者： HOPE, JP STORTZ, VE Jan Paul Hope a native of Northern Virginia received his bachelor of science degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Virginia in 1969. Upon graduation he began his career in the Department of the Navy with the Naval Ship Systems Command in the acquisition of patrol craft mine sweepers and submarine rescue ships. In January 1971 he transferred to the ship arrangements branch of the Naval Ship Engineering Center. He was selected for the long-term training program at George Washington University in 1974 and completed the program in February 1976 with the degree of master of engineering administration. While at the Naval Ship Engineering Center Mr. Hope was general arrangement task leader on the AO-177 CG-47 CSGN CSGN (VSTOL) CGN-9 (Aegis) and CGN-42 and he also assisted in the landmark Naval Sea Systems Command civilian professional community study. In 1978 he was selected as acting head of the damage control section and subsequently was selected as acting head of the surface ship hydrodynamic section. In February 1980 he was promoted to head of the surface combatant arrangements design section. Mr. Hope was selected for the first class of the NA VSEA commander's development program. While on the program he served in the DDGX combat systems engineering division and the DDGX project office of NA VSEA was the assistant director for ship design in the office of the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for shipbuilding and logistics and was the director of weight engineering and the director of systems engineering for the DDG-51 project in NA VSEA. Upon completion of the program Mr. Hope was assigned as the deputy director of the boiler engineering division to create a new division as a major fleet support initiative by NA VSEA. In June 1985 he joined the staff of the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for shipbuilding and logistics. Mr. Hope was presented the Department of the Navy meritorious civilian service medal in June 1983 for his service with the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the

This paper discusses the need and processes for designing warships to meet cost constraints and for managing warship acquisition programs during the design phase to assure effective adherence to production cost constraints by the design team. The resource control methodology used during the contract design of the Arleigh Burke class destroyer, DDG-51, is examined as a potential model for controlling the cost while maintaining the combat effectiveness of warships. The paper begins with a summary of the basic issue — the relationship among unit cost, unit capability, force level numbers, and force capability — showing recent trends in destroyer costs and force levels. This introduction also includes a discussion of the cost constraint for the DDG-51 in relation to historical trends and ship construction funding allocation. The resource control methodology used to reduce and control costs of the DDG-51 is discussed with a summary of the approach, key concepts and tools, chronology of key events, examples, and results achieved. A number of observations on this methodology are then made which are followed by comments on life cycle costs. The paper concludes with remarks on the future application of the resource control methodology and areas for further work to improve future resource control efforts.

关键词： WARSHIPS

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

AQUIFER-PARAMETER EVALUATION from VARIABLE-RATE PUMPING TESTS USING CONVOLUTION AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

引用

GROUND WATER 1985年第2期23卷 212-219页

作者： BUTT, MA MCELWEE, CD Munir A. Butt received a B.E. degree in Civil Engineering in 1969 from Regional Engineering College Naseem Bagh Srinagar Kashmir. He graduated in 1973 from Roorkee University India with an M.E. degree in Water Resources Development. In 1977 he received his M.S. degree in Water Resources Engineering from the University of Kansas. From 1969 to 1975 he worked as an Assistant Engineer in Kashmir Irrigation Flood Control and Power Development departments. Presently he is a Research Associate and Hydrologic Data Manager for the Kansas Geological Survey in the Geohydrology Section. Areas of special interest are numerical ground-water models and the inverse problem. Kansas Geological Survey The University of Kansas 1930 Constant Avenue–Campus West Lawrence Kansas 66044–3896. Carl D. McElwee graduated in 1965 from William Jewell College with a B.A. in Physics. He received the M.A. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Kansas in 1967 and 1971 respectively. His research area was solid state physics. From 1971 to 1974 he worked for Texaco Inc. in Houston Texas as a Research Geophysicist. Since 1974 he has worked for the Kansas Geological Survey in the Geohydrology and Geophysics and Geochemistry Sections His area of special interest is ground-water models

The reliability of predictive and management models for ground water would be improved by better aquifer-parameter estimation. As progress continues in the use of computers to simulate ground-water systems, parallel progress must occur in data collection and analysis. Among the various methods available for the determination of aquifer parameters, pumping tests occupy a prominent position. The maximum advantage is gained from a pumping test when geological knowledge of the aquifer and the analysis of aquifer test data complement each other. This paper presents a technique involving the use of convolution and sensitivity analysis to obtain the “best fit” of aquifer parameters in a least-squares sense from a pumping test with variable pumping rate. The method also can be used to analyze the residual drawdown data obtained during the recovery period. In addition, this method can also analyze drawdown and recovery data conjunctively. Constant drawdown and variable discharge data of artesian flowing wells also can be analyzed by this method. The method is straightforward, quick, inexpensive, and is always objective. No graphical plots or graphical interpretations are needed. As a measure of error, the rms (root-mean-square) error in drawdown is calculated along with the correlation coefficient between pumping-test data and the theoretically generated data, using the converged values of transmissivity and storage coefficient.

关键词： AQUIFERS

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

DESIGN FOR NEW-JERSEY, IOWA, AND DES-MOINES MODERNIZATION

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1984年第3期96卷 25-38页

作者： SIMS, PJ EDWARDS, JR DICKEY, RL SHULL, HS Philip J. Sims:graduated from Webb Institute in 1971 and went to work for the Advance Design Branch of the Naval Ship Engineering Center. He was part of the FFG-7 design team in 1972. The 1973–75 years were spent developing automated early-stage aircraft carrier design procedures and performing carrier design trade-off work in support of the CVV design. He returned to school in 1976 for a masters at M.I. T. The 1977–80 period was spent updating the Navy's destroyer-cruiser early-stage design procedures and performing studies for the CGN-42 reserve FFX and DDX (later DDG 51) projects. Also during this period he was team leader on concept formulation (CONFORM) studies of new ships such as a heavy combatant and a low detectability ship. From 1981 to early 1983 Mr. Sims was Design Integration Manager for the BB-62 and Ship Design Manager for the BB-61 and CA-134. He is presently principal naval architect for the FFX study and also works on the NA TO frigate effort. James F. Edwards Sr:.is the Technical Director Ship Analytics Inc. Washington D.C. Operations and was the Ship Design Manager for the battleship USSNew Jerseyprior to his departure from NAVSEA in August 1983. He joined the U.S. Navy Reserves in 1954 and served on active duty from 1957 to 1960. From 1961 to 1963 he worked for McLaughlin Research Corporation as a section head in the drafting department. From 1963 to 1966 he worked for the Vitro Corporation of America in the Terrier (surface missile systems) Department. In 1966 he participated in the contract design of the first shipboard integrated digital ASW Command and Control system while working for the Stanwick Corporation. In 1967 Mr. Edwards accepted a position at NAVSHIPS in the Combat System Integration Division. In 1974 he transferred to what is currently NAVSEA's Hull Design Division. In 1980 Mr. Edwards was designated as the Battleship and Heavy Cruiser General Arrangements Task Leader and subsequently served as the Hull Task Group Manager the Ship Configuration Control Manager and fina

In reactivating the battleship New Jersey , the Navy faced three major problems. The baseline data on the ship was not readily available or reliable, a new generation cruise missile armament was proposed, and the ship delivery schedule was very tight. After doing a feasibility study, system design engineers were taken onboard the mothballed ship to resolve the design problems. Being on the ship allowed an intensive effort and immediate reference to the actual ship configuration. The tools used to control this effort were a ship check plan, a ship check form and the master arrangement drawing. Simultaneously with the design effort, a repair scoping effort was conducted. The design evolution and solutions to the major problems are described. The results of the New Jersey effort are shown with sample documentation, the ship characteristics and the downstream design effort. The Iowa was the next ship to be modernized. The top level requirements were the same as New Jersey's but new problems were encountered. More options were investigated which diverted attention from the basic effort. A fundamental difference was the Iowa had not had a 1968 reactivation as the New Jersey had, so items that were repair and reactivation on the New Jersey in 1968 had to be part of the Iowa modernization. A major influence on the Iowa design process was that a complete set of specifications for a private yard bid had to be developed. The next effort was to install the same New Jersey modernization payload on a Des Moines class heavy cruiser. Heavy cruisers are large ships but significantly smaller than battleships and much closer to their naval architectural limits of weight and center of gravity. They have much less topside area than the battleships, and the new payload was very topside space consuming. The cruisers are also much more restricted in internal volume. Two feasibility studies were conducted. One resolved volume problems but approached the weight and center of gravity limits.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

THE NO FRAME CONCEPT - ITS IMPACT ON SHIPYARD COST

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1984年第3期96卷 218-232页

作者： NAPPI, NS WALZ, RW WIERNICKI, CJ Natale S. Nappi:graduated from City College of New York in 1954 with a B.S. degree in civil engineering and received his M.S. in civil engineering from the Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn in 1959. He began his professional career in 1954 at the New York Naval Shipyard as a naval architect (structures) performing detail structural design and fabrication studies for CVAs LPDs DDs and CGs and eventually became a supervisory naval architect (structures). From 1965 to 1973 he was a member of the staff of the Computer-Aided Design Division at the David Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center (DTNSRDC). As such he was involved in the development of the computer structural design tool the SSDP (in association with Frank M. Lev) and automated detail design programs (CASDOS). His current position is Senior Naval Architect Consultant in the structural integrity group of the Ship Structures Division Structures Department DTNSRDC. Mr. Nappi is the author and co-author of numerous technical papers and reports covering a wide spectrum of topics such as automated structural design process design for producibility and survivability material weight and cost trade-off studies and structural weight determination for high performance ships (i.e. SES SWATH HYSWAS). He has lectured on the subjects of design for survivability and ship structures at the Naval Post Graduate School and MIT. He is a member of ASNE ASCE U.S. Naval Institute Sigma Xi and is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of New York. Mr. Nappi was a member of the NAVSEA working commitee for the computer supported design planning effort and is currently a member of the DTNSRDC ASSET Advisory Committee. Ronald W. Walz:graduated in 1974 from Pennsylvania State University with a B.S. degree in civil engineering. He began his professional career in 1974 at the David Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center as a structural engineer in the structural design concepts group of the Ship Structures Division Structures Department.

A proposed cost effective alternative to current U.S. Navy structurally configured hulls is presented in this paper. This proposed design for producibility concept involves the elimination of structural stanchions and transverse web frames. The potential impact of this “no frame” concept on structural design, weight and construction and material costs for naval surface frigates and destroyers is reflected in 1) reduced costs for the installation of distributive systems and 2) a reduced number and complexity of structural details providing a more reliable and less costly structure. This study was performed in three parts: 1) Determine the most feasible length between bulkheads without frames; 2) Using this length perform detail weight studies and construction and material costs analysis comparison on a 72-foot long hull module, with and without frames, for a FFG-7, and 3) Estimate the saving in man hours of labor on the installation of distributive systems and shipfitting for an FFG-7. For the feasible length studies on the “no frame” structural configuration, thirty-seven strength, weight and vertical center of gravity studies were performed on two ship classes; twenty-two on the FFG-7 class and fifteen on the DD-963 class. The detailed weight studies and construction and material cost analyses were conducted for FFG-7 “no frame” and “as built” modules. Results indicating the “no frame” concept module was 6.8% heavier and 14.8% less costly than the “as built” module. For the impact of an FFG-7 “no frame” structurally configured hull on the cost of labor required for the installation of distributive systems and for other functional work such as ship fitting, welding, and electrical, this study indicated a reduction of 169,206 labor hours per ship, representing 7.12% of the total required man hours to fabricate an FFG-7 class ship. With the employment of the “no frame” concept, certain areas of significant concern and potential risk were addressed. These include: 1) t

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

EDITOR'S CLIPBOARD: RELIABILITY, MAINTAINABILITY, AVAILABILITY ‐ THE REAL QUESTION

引用

Naval Engineers Journal 1983年第5期95卷 76-82页

作者： Richardson, James C. Berman, Paul I. Capt. James C. Richardson Jr. a surface warfare officer was graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy U.S. Naval Postgraduate School and the American University. With proven subspecialities in Material Management and Computer Systems Technology he has served as Commanding Officer USS Hepburn (FF-IOSS) Program Manager of the Mk 86 Gun Fire Control System at the Naval Sea Systems Command and is currently Commanding Officer of the Navy Regional Data Automation Center Washington D. C. Paul Berman is manager of Product Support Engineering for Lockheed Electronics Company Plain field New Jersey. His department is responsible for logistics planning and analysk supply support field engineering training and technical documentation in support of the division as products. His 30 years of experience in product support include preparation of logistics plans engineering data technical publications and training materials. He is also an adjunct instructor at Rutgers University. Mr. Berman received a BA from Queens College in 1951 and an MA from Hunter College in 1957. He attended the U.S. Army Signal Corps radar school and was a field radio and radar repairman during the Korean War. He is currently a member of the Society of Logistics Engineers and the National Management Association.

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

THE SURFACE EFFECT CATAMARAN - PROGRESS IN CONCEPT ASSESSMENT

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1983年第3期95卷 301-311页

作者： WILSON, FW VIARS, PR ADAMS, JD Fred W. Wilson:received his B.A. degree from the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in 1967 and his M.A. degree from the University of Tennessee in 1971. Mr. Wilson has been involved with air-supported vehicle technology at the Aviation and Surface Effects Department of the David Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center since 1967. Until 1979 Mr. Wilson was with the Surface Effect Ship Division and participated in early SES development the SES-100A and -100B trials and in the 3000-ton SES program. Since 1979 Mr. Wilson has been in the Program Development Office participating in aircraft programs as well as the current twin-cushion surface effect ship (Surface Effect Catamaran) program. Philip R. Viars:graduated from the University of Cincinnati with a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering in 1974. He received his M.S. in Ocean and Marine Engineering from George Washington University in 1980. Since 1972 Mr. Viars has worked in the Aviation and Surface Effects Department at the David Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center (DTNSRDC). While at DTNSRDC Mr. Viars has participated in model and full-scale experimental programs focused on simulation. Mr. Viars is recognized as the Center expert in SES stability and performance having participated in most of the manned Navy SES testcraft evaluations. Since 1981 Mr. Viars has been in the Program Development Office where he has worked on the twin-cushion surface effect ship (SECAT) and other programs. John D. Adams:received his B.S.E. in 1972 from the University of Michigan School of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering. He has spent seven years in Marine engineering research Marine systems design and development and dynamic tow tank testing and data analysis. Mr. Adams is currently responsible for the Maritime Dynamics Inc. field operation at the U.S. NavySES Test Facility (SESTF) Patuxent River Maryland. On-site responsibility has been the design development and manned testing of active ride control systems for the U.S. NavyXR-

The surface effect catamaran incorporates twin high length-to-beam cushions to support a low length-to-beam platform. The performance characteristics of the resulting vehicle, i.e., the resistance and head sea motions, are equivalent to a higher length-to-beam surface effect ship. The high lateral stability which results from the widely spaced hulls and cushions of the surface effect catamaran provides several advantages not inherent in conventional surface effect ship configurations. These advantages are manifested by high cross-structure height and reduced structural loads without reduction in static or dynamic roll stability. For an 800-ton ship the widely spaced cushions provide a capability of controlling off-head sea types of motions and the virtual elimination of green water over the deck up through Sea State 6. Model tests have validated cushionborne and hullborne resistance computer prediction programs. Head sea motions tests have justified the use of high cross-structure height to minimize high slam types of structural loads. Preliminary design and model tests indicate the potential for the surface effect catamaran to operate as an open ocean ship in smaller sizes than heretofore thought possible. In addition, its planform and large volume provides pay-load capabilities of much larger ships.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：