检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

Reporting tumor genomic test results to SEER registries via linkages

Journal of the National Cancer Institute - Monographs 2024年第65期2024卷 168-179页

作者： Petkov, Valentina I. Byun, Jung S. Ward, Kevin C. Schussler, Nicola C. Archer, Natalie P. Bentler, Suzanne Doherty, Jennifer A. Durbin, Eric B. Gershman, Susan T. Cheng, Iona Insaf, Tabassum Gonsalves, Lou Hernandez, Brenda Y. Koch, Lori Liu, Lihua Monnereau, Alain Morawski, Bozena M. Schwartz, Stephen M. Stroup, Antoinette Wiggins, Charles Wu, Xiao-Cheng Bonds, Sarah Negoita, Serban Penberthy, Lynne Surveillance Research Program Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences National Cancer Institute Bethesda MD United States Emory University Atlanta GA United States Information Management Services Inc Calverton MD United States Cancer Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch Texas Department of State Health Services Austin TX United States Iowa Cancer Registry The University of Iowa Iowa City IA United States Hunstman Cancer Institute University of Utah Salt Lake City UT United States Department of Population Health Sciences University of Utah Salt Lake City UT United States Cancer Research Informatics Shared Resource Facility Markey Cancer Center Kentucky Cancer Registry University of Kentucky Lexington KY United States Massachusetts Cancer Registry Boston MA United States Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics University of California San Francisco San Francisco CA United States New York State Department of Health New York State Cancer Registry Albany NY United States Connecticut Department of Public Health Connecticut Tumor Registry Hartford CT United States University of Hawaii Cancer Center Honolulu HI United States Illinois State Cancer Registry Springfield IL United States Department of Population and Public Health Sciences Keck School of Medicine University of Southern California Los Angeles CA United States Public Health Institute Cancer Registry of Greater California Sacramento CA United States Cancer Data Registry of Idaho Boise ID United States Division of Public Health Sciences Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center Seattle WA United States New Jersey State Cancer Registry Trenton NJ United States Department of Internal Medicine University of New Mexico Albuquerque NM United States School of Medicine Louisiana State University New Orleans LA United States

Background: Precision medicine has become a mainstay of cancer care in recent years. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program has been an authoritative source of cancer statistics and data since 1973. However, tumor genomic information has not been adequately captured in the cancer surveillance data, which impedes population-based research on molecular subtypes. To address this, the SEER program has developed and implemented a centralized process to link SEER registries' tumor cases with genomic test results that are provided by molecular laboratories to the registries. Methods: data linkages were carried out following operating procedures for centralized linkages established by the SEER program. The linkages used Match∗Pro, a probabilistic linkage software, and were facilitated by the registries' trusted third party (an honest broker). The SEER registries provide to NCI limited datasets that undergo preliminary evaluation prior to their release to the research community. Results: Recently conducted genomic linkages included OncotypeDX Breast Recurrence Score, OncotypeDX Breast Ductal Carcinoma in Situ, OncotypeDX Genomic Prostate Score, Decipher Prostate Genomic Classifier, DecisionDX Uveal Melanoma, DecisionDX Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma, DecisionDX Melanoma, and germline tests results in Georgia and California SEER registries. Conclusions: The linkages of cancer cases from SEER registries with genomic test results obtained from molecular laboratories offer an effective approach for data collection in cancer surveillance. By providing de-identified data to the research community, the NCI's SEER program enables scientists to investigate numerous research inquiries. © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

A General-Purpose Self-Supervised Model for Computational Pathology

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2023年

作者： Chen, Richard J. Ding, Tong Lu, Ming Y. Williamson, Drew F.K. Jaume, Guillaume Chen, Bowen Zhang, Andrew Shao, Daniel Song, Andrew H. Shaban, Muhammad Williams, Mane Vaidya, Anurag Sahai, Sharifa Oldenburg, Lukas Weishaupt, Luca L. Wang, Judy J. Williams, Walt Le, Long Phi Gerber, Georg Mahmood, Faisal Department of Pathology Brigham and Women’s Hospital Harvard Medical School BostonMA United States Department of Pathology Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School BostonMA United States Cancer Program Broad Institute of Harvard MIT CambridgeMA United States Cancer Data Science Program Dana-Farber Cancer Institute BostonMA United States Department of Biomedical Informatics Harvard Medical School BostonMA United States CambridgeMA United States Health Sciences and Technology Harvard-MIT CambridgeMA United States Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering And Applied Sciences Harvard University CambridgeMA United States Department of Systems Biology Harvard University CambridgeMA United States Harvard Data Science Initiative Harvard University CambridgeMA United States

Tissue phenotyping is a fundamental computational pathology (CPath) task in learning objective characterizations of histopathologic biomarkers in anatomic pathology. However, whole-slide imaging (WSI) poses a complex computer vision problem in which the large-scale image resolutions of WSIs and the enormous diversity of morphological phenotypes preclude large-scale data annotation. Current efforts have proposed using pretrained image encoders with either transfer learning from natural image datasets or self-supervised pretraining on publicly-available histopathology datasets, but have not been extensively developed and evaluated across diverse tissue types at scale. We introduce UNI, a general-purpose self-supervised model for pathology, pretrained using over 100 million tissue patches from over 100,000 diagnostic haematoxylin and eosin-stained WSIs across 20 major tissue types, and evaluated on 33 representative CPath clinical tasks in CPath of varying diagnostic difficulties. In addition to outperforming previous state-of-the-art models, we demonstrate new modeling capabilities in CPath such as resolution-agnostic tissue classification, slide classification using few-shot class prototypes, and disease subtyping generalization in classifying up to 108 cancer types in the OncoTree code classification system. UNI advances unsupervised representation learning at scale in CPath in terms of both pretraining data and downstream evaluation, enabling data-efficient AI models that can generalize and transfer to a gamut of diagnostically-challenging tasks and clinical workflows in anatomic pathology. Copyright © 2023, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Pathology

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Inter-rater reliability of the infectious disease modeling reproducibility checklist (IDMRC) as applied to COVID-19 computational modeling research

引用

BMC Infectious Diseases 2023年第1期23卷 733-733页

作者： Pokutnaya, Darya Van Panhuis, Willem G Childers, Bruce Hawkins, Marquis S Arcury-Quandt, Alice E Matlack, Meghan Carpio, Kharlya Hochheiser, Harry Department of Epidemiology University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh PA United States Office of Data Science and Emerging Technologies National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Rockville MD United States Department of Computer Science University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh PA United States Department of Environmental and Occupational Health University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh PA United States Department of Biomedical Informatics Intelligent Systems Program and Clinical and Translational Science Institute University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh PA United States

Background: Infectious disease computational modeling studies have been widely published during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, yet they have limited reproducibility. Developed through an iterative testing process with multiple reviewers, the Infectious Disease Modeling Reproducibility Checklist (IDMRC) enumerates the minimal elements necessary to support reproducible infectious disease computational modeling publications. The primary objective of this study was to assess the reliability of the IDMRC and to identify which reproducibility elements were unreported in a sample of COVID-19 computational modeling publications. Methods: Four reviewers used the IDMRC to assess 46 preprint and peer reviewed COVID-19 modeling studies published between March 13th, 2020, and July 30th, 2020. The inter-rater reliability was evaluated by mean percent agreement and Fleiss’ kappa coefficients (κ). Papers were ranked based on the average number of reported reproducibility elements, and average proportion of papers that reported each checklist item were tabulated. Results: Questions related to the computational environment (mean κ = 0.90, range = 0.90–0.90), analytical software (mean κ = 0.74, range = 0.68–0.82), model description (mean κ = 0.71, range = 0.58–0.84), model implementation (mean κ = 0.68, range = 0.39–0.86), and experimental protocol (mean κ = 0.63, range = 0.58–0.69) had moderate or greater (κ > 0.41) inter-rater reliability. Questions related to data had the lowest values (mean κ = 0.37, range = 0.23–0.59). Reviewers ranked similar papers in the upper and lower quartiles based on the proportion of reproducibility elements each paper reported. While over 70% of the publications provided data used in their models, less than 30% provided the model implementation. Conclusions: The IDMRC is the first comprehensive, quality-assessed tool for guiding researchers in reporting reproducible infectious disease computational modeling studies. The inter-rater re

关键词： Coronavirus Disease 2019 COVID-19 Epidemiology Infectious Disease Modeling Reproducibility

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas

引用

Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition) 2021年第9期74卷 790-799页

作者： Matthew J. Page Joanne E. McKenzie Patrick M. Bossuyt Isabelle Boutron Tammy C. Hoffmann Cynthia D. Mulrow Larissa Shamseer Jennifer M. Tetzlaff Elie A. Akl Sue E. Brennan Roger Chou Julie Glanville Jeremy M. Grimshaw Asbjørn Hróbjartsson Manoj M. Lalu Tianjing Li Elizabeth W. Loder Evan Mayo-Wilson David Moher School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Monash University Melbourne Australia Department of Clinical Epidemiology Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Amsterdam University Medical Centres University of Amsterdam Amsterdam Países Bajos Université de Paris Centre of Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS) Inserm F 75004 Paris Francia Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine Bond University Gold Coast Australia University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio San Antonio Texas Estados Unidos Annals of Internal Medicine Knowledge Translation Program Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute Toronto Canadá School of Epidemiology and Public Health Faculty of Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa Canada Evidence Partners Ottawa Canadá Clinical Research Institute American University of Beirut Beirut Líbano Department of Health Research Methods Evidence and Impact McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canadá Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregón Estados Unidos York Health Economics Consortium (YHEC Ltd) University of York York Reino Unido Clinical Epidemiology Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Canadá School of Epidemiology and Public Health University of Ottawa Ottawa Canadá Department of Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa Canadá Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Odense Odense University Hospital Odense Dinamarca Department of Clinical Research University of Southern Denmark Odense Dinamarca Open Patient data Explorative Network Odense University Hospital Odense Dinamarca Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine The Ottawa Hospital Ottawa Canadá Clinical Epidemiology Program Blueprint Translational Research Group Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Canadá Regenerative Medicine Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Canadá Department of Ophthalmology School of Medicine University of Colorado Denver Den

La declaración PRISMA ( Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses ), publicada en 2009, se diseñó para ayudar a los autores de revisiones sistemáticas a documentar de manera transparente el porqué de la revisión, qué hicieron los autores y qué encontraron. Durante la última década, ha habido muchos avances en la metodología y terminología de las revisiones sistemáticas, lo que ha requerido una actualización de esta guía. La declaración prisma 2020 sustituye a la declaración de 2009 e incluye una nueva guía de presentación de las publicaciones que refleja los avances en los métodos para identificar, seleccionar, evaluar y sintetizar estudios. La estructura y la presentación de los ítems ha sido modificada para facilitar su implementación. En este artículo, presentamos la lista de verificación PRISMA 2020 con 27 ítems, y una lista de verificación ampliada que detalla las recomendaciones en la publicación de cada ítem, la lista de verificación del resumen estructurado PRISMA 2020 y el diagrama de flujo revisado para revisiones sistemáticas. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews. Full English text available from : ***

关键词： Guía de publicación Revisión sistemática Metanálisis Escritura médica Publishing guide Systematic review Meta-analysis Medical writing

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

The All of Us data and Research Center: Creating a Secure, Scalable, and Sustainable Ecosystem for Biomedical Research

引用

Biomedical data Science 1000年第1期6卷 443-464页

作者： Kelsey R. Mayo Melissa A. Basford Robert J. Carroll Moira Dillon Heather Fullen Jesse Leung Hiral Master Shimon Rura Lina Sulieman Nan Kennedy Eric Banks David Bernick Asmita Gauchan Lee Lichtenstein Brandy M. Mapes Kayla Marginean Steve L. Nyemba Andrea Ramirez Charissa Rotundo Keri Wolfe Weiyi Xia Romuladus E. Azuine Robert M. Cronin Joshua C. Denny Abel Kho Christopher Lunt Bradley Malin Karthik Natarajan Consuelo H. Wilkins Hua Xu George Hripcsak Dan M. Roden Anthony A. Philippakis David Glazer Paul A. Harris 1Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA 2Deparment of Biomedical Informatics Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA email: paul.a.harris@*** 3Verily Life Sciences South San Francisco California USA 4Data Sciences Platform Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT Cambridge Massachusetts USA 5Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT Cambridge Massachusetts USA 6The All of Us Research Program National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland USA 7Vanderbilt University Medical Center Enterprise Cybersecurity Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA 8Department of Internal Medicine The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA 9Department of Medicine and Institute for Augmented Intelligence in Medicine Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA 10Department of Biomedical Informatics Columbia University New York NY USA 11Department of Medicine Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA 12Section of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science School of Medicine Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA 13Department of Pharmacology Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA

The All of Us Research program's data and Research Center (DRC) was established to help acquire, curate, and provide access to one of the world's largest and most diverse datasets for precision medicine research. Already, over 500,000 participants are enrolled in All of Us, 80% of whom are underrepresented in biomedical research, and data are being analyzed by a community of over 2,300 researchers. The DRC created this thriving data ecosystem by collaborating with engaged participants, innovative program partners, and empowered researchers. In this review, we first describe how the DRC is organized to meet the needs of this broad group of stakeholders. We then outline guiding principles, common challenges, and innovative approaches used to build the All of Us data ecosystem. Finally, we share lessons learned to help others navigate important decisions and trade-offs in building a modern biomedical data platform.

关键词： precision medicine data ecosystem diversity data privacy data integration electronic health records

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Towards a Visual-Language Foundation Model for Computational Pathology

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2023年

作者： Lu, Ming Y. Chen, Bowen Williamson, Drew F.K. Chen, Richard J. Liang, Ivy Ding, Tong Jaume, Guillaume Odintsov, Igor Zhang, Andrew Le, Long Phi Gerber, Georg Parwani, Anil V. Mahmood, Faisal Department of Pathology Brigham and Women’s Hospital Harvard Medical School BostonMA United States Department of Pathology Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School BostonMA United States Cancer Program Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT CambridgeMA United States Cancer Data Science Program Dana-Farber Cancer Institute BostonMA United States Department of Biomedical Informatics Harvard Medical School BostonMA United States CambridgeMA United States Health Sciences and Technology Harvard-MIT CambridgeMA United States Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering And Applied Sciences Harvard University CambridgeMA United States Department of Pathology Wexner Medical Center Ohio State University ColumbusOH United States Harvard Data Science Initiative Harvard University CambridgeMA United States

The accelerated adoption of digital pathology and advances in deep learning have enabled the development of powerful models for various pathology tasks across a diverse array of diseases and patient cohorts1–13. However, model training is often difficult due to label scarcity in the medical domain and the model’s usage is limited by the specific task and disease for which it is trained1–3, 14, 15. Additionally, most models in histopathology leverage only image data, a stark contrast to how humans teach each other and reason about histopathologic entities. We introduce CONtrastive learning from Captions for Histopathology (CONCH), a visual-language foundation model developed using diverse sources of histopathology images, biomedical text, and notably over 1.17 million image-caption pairs via task-agnostic pretraining. Evaluated on a suite of 13 diverse benchmarks, CONCH can be transferred to a wide range of downstream tasks involving either or both histopathology images and text, achieving state-of-the-art performance on histology image classification, segmentation, captioning, text-to-image and image-to-text retrieval. CONCH represents a substantial leap over concurrent visual-language pretrained systems for histopathology, with the potential to directly facilitate a wide array of machine learning-based workflows requiring minimal or no further supervised fine-tuning. © 2023, CC BY-NC-ND.

关键词： Pathology

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021

引用

The Lancet 2023年第10397期402卷 203-234页

作者： Ong, Kanyin Liane Stafford, Lauryn K. McLaughlin, Susan A. Boyko, Edward J. Vollset, Stein Emil Smith, Amanda E. Dalton, Bronte E. Duprey, Joe Cruz, Jessica A. Hagins, Hailey Lindstedt, Paulina A. Aali, Amirali Abate, Yohannes Habtegiorgis Abate, Melsew Dagne Abbasian, Mohammadreza Abbasi-Kangevari, Zeinab Abbasi-Kangevari, Mohsen ElHafeez, Samar Abd Abd-Rabu, Rami Abdulah, Deldar Morad Abdullah, Abu Yousuf Md Abedi, Vida Abidi, Hassan Aboagye, Richard Gyan Abolhassani, Hassan Abu-Gharbieh, Eman Abu-Zaid, Ahmed Adane, Tigist Demssew Adane, Denberu Eshetie Addo, Isaac Yeboah Adegboye, Oyelola A. Adekanmbi, Victor Adepoju, Abiola Victor Adnani, Qorinah Estiningtyas Sakilah Afolabi, Rotimi Felix Agarwal, Gina Aghdam, Zahra Babaei Agudelo-Botero, Marcela Arriagada, Constanza Elizabeth Aguilera Agyemang-Duah, Williams Ahinkorah, Bright Opoku Ahmad, Danish Ahmad, Rizwan Ahmad, Sajjad Ahmad, Aqeel Ahmadi, Ali Ahmadi, Keivan Ahmed, Ali Ahmed, Luai A. Ahmed, Syed Anees Ajami, Marjan Akinyemi, Rufus Olusola Al Hamad, Hanadi Al Hasan, Syed Mahfuz AL-Ahdal, Tareq Mohammed Ali Alalwan, Tariq A. Al-Aly, Ziyad AlBataineh, Mohammad T. Alcalde-Rabanal, Jacqueline Elizabeth Alemi, Sharifullah Ali, Hassam Alinia, Tahereh Aljunid, Syed Mohamed Almustanyir, Sami Al-Raddadi, Rajaa M. Alvis-Guzman, Nelson Amare, Firehiwot Ameyaw, Edward Kwabena Amiri, Sohrab Amusa, Ganiyu Adeniyi Andrei, Catalina Liliana Anjana, Ranjit Mohan Ansar, Adnan Ansari, Golnoosh Ansari-Moghaddam, Alireza Anyasodor, Anayochukwu Edward Arabloo, Jalal Aravkin, Aleksandr Y. Areda, Demelash Arifin, Hidayat Arkew, Mesay Armocida, Benedetta Arnlov, Johan Artamonov, Anton A. Arulappan, Judie Aruleba, Raphael Taiwo Arumugam, Ashokan Aryan, Zahra Asemu, Mulu Tiruneh Asghari-Jafarabadi, Mohammad Askari, Elaheh Asmelash, Daniel Astell-Burt, Thomas Athar, Mohammad Athari, Seyyed Shamsadin Atout, Maha Moh'd Wahbi Avila-Burgos, Leticia Awaisu, Ahmed Azadnajafabad, Sina Darshan, B.B. Babamohamadi, Hassan Badar, Muhammad Badawi, Alaa Badiye, Ashish D. Baghcheghi, Nayereh Baghe Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation School of Medicine General Medicine Service Department of Veterans Affairs Seattle WA United States Department of Health Metrics Sciences School of Medicine Faculty of Medicine France Department of Clinical Governance and Quality Improvement Aleta Wondo Hospital Aleta Wondo Ethiopia Department of Nursing Woldia University Woldia Ethiopia Department of Nursing Department of Orthopedic Surgery Orthopaedic Surgery Social Determinants of Health Research Center Non-communicable Diseases Research Center Epidemiology Department Evidence-Based Practice Center Community and Maternity Nursing Unit University of Duhok Duhok Iraq School of Planning Faculty of Environment Department of Public Health Sciences Penn State College of Medicine Pennsylvania State University Hershey PA United States Biocomplexity Institute Virginia Tech Blacksburg VA United States College of Medicine Department of Public Health Laboratory Technology Sciences Department Department of Family and Community Health University of Health and Allied Sciences Ho Ghana Research Center for Immunodeficiencies Department of Biosciences and Nutrition Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge Sweden Clinical Sciences Department Department of Surgery Department of Surgery Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology College of Graduate Health Sciences University of Tennessee Memphis TN United States Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Department of Clinical and Psychosocial Epidemiology Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Centre for Social Research in Health Quality and Systems Performance Unit Cancer Institute NSW Sydney NSW Australia Department of Public Health and Tropical Medicine HIV and Infectious Diseases Department Jhpiego Abuja Nigeria Adolescent Research and Care Department Adolescent Friendly Research Initiative and Care Ado Ekiti Nigeria Department of Epidemiology Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics Department of Family Medicine McMaster University

Background: Diabetes is one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide, and affects people regardless of country, age group, or sex. Using the most recent evidentiary and analytical framework from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD), we produced location-specific, age-specific, and sex-specific estimates of diabetes prevalence and burden from 1990 to 2021, the proportion of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in 2021, the proportion of the type 2 diabetes burden attributable to selected risk factors, and projections of diabetes prevalence through 2050. Methods: Estimates of diabetes prevalence and burden were computed in 204 countries and territories, across 25 age groups, for males and females separately and combined;these estimates comprised lost years of healthy life, measured in disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs;defined as the sum of years of life lost [YLLs] and years lived with disability [YLDs]). We used the Cause of Death Ensemble model (CODEm) approach to estimate deaths due to diabetes, incorporating 25 666 location-years of data from vital registration and verbal autopsy reports in separate total (including both type 1 and type 2 diabetes) and type-specific models. Other forms of diabetes, including gestational and monogenic diabetes, were not explicitly modelled. Total and type 1 diabetes prevalence was estimated by use of a Bayesian meta-regression modelling tool, DisMod-MR 2.1, to analyse 1527 location-years of data from the scientific literature, survey microdata, and insurance claims;type 2 diabetes estimates were computed by subtracting type 1 diabetes from total estimates. Mortality and prevalence estimates, along with standard life expectancy and disability weights, were used to calculate YLLs, YLDs, and DALYs. When appropriate, we extrapolated estimates to a hypothetical population with a standardised age structure to allow comparison in populations with different age structures. We used the comparative r

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Emotion recognition in doctor-patient interactions from real-world clinical video database: Initial development of artificial empathy

引用

Computer Methods and programs in Biomedicine 2023年 233卷 107480-107480页

作者： Huang, Chih-Wei Wu, Bethany C.Y. Nguyen, Phung Anh Wang, Hsiao-Han Kao, Chih-Chung Lee, Pei-Chen Rahmanti, Annisa Ristya Hsu, Jason C. Yang, Hsuan-Chia Li, Yu-Chuan Jack Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan Taipei Medical University Ringgold standard institution - Center for Simulation in Medical Education Taipei 116 Taiwan National Taiwan University Children and Family Research Center Sponsored by CTBC Charity Foundation Taipei Taiwan Clinical Data Center Office of Data Science Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan Clinical Big Data Research Center Taipei Medical University Hospital Taipei Taiwan Graduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics College of Medical Science and Technology Taipei Medical University TMU Da'an Campus 15 F No. 172-1 Kee lung Road Section 2 Da-an District Taipei Taiwan Research Center of Big Data and Meta-analysis Wanfang Hospital Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan Department of Dermatology Wanfang Hospital Taipei Medical University Taiwan Department of Dermatology School of Medicine College of Medicine Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan Delta Research Center Taipei Taiwan Department of Health Policy and Management Faculty of Medicine Public Health and Nursing Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta Indonesia International PhD Program in Biotech and Healthcare Management College of Management Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan Research Center of Data Science on Healthcare Industry College of Management Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan

Background and objective: The promising use of artificial intelligence (AI) to emulate human empathy may help a physician engage with a more empathic doctor-patient relationship. This study demonstrates the application of artificial empathy based on facial emotion recognition to evaluate doctor-patient relationships in clinical practice. Methods: A prospective study used recorded video data of doctor-patient clinical encounters in dermatology outpatient clinics, Taipei Municipal Wanfang Hospital, and Taipei Medical University Hospital collected from March to December 2019. Two cameras recorded the facial expressions of four doctors and 348 adult patients during regular clinical practice. Facial emotion recognition was used to analyze the basic emotions of doctors and patients with a temporal resolution of 1 second. In addition, a physician-patient satisfaction questionnaire was administered after each clinical session, and two standard patients gave impartial feedback to avoid bias. Results: data from 326 clinical session videos showed that (1) Doctors expressed more emotions than patients (t [326] > = 2.998, p © 2023

关键词： Emotion Recognition

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Genetic analysis of over 1 million people identifies 535 new loci associated with blood pressure traits (vol 50, pg 1412, 2018)

引用

NATURE GENETICS 2018年第12期50卷 1755-1755页

作者： Evangelou, Evangelos Warren, Helen R. Mosen-Ansorena, David Mifsud, Borbala Pazoki, Raha Gao, He Ntritsos, Georgios Dimou, Niki Cabrera, Claudia P. Karaman, Ibrahim Fu Liang Ng Evangelou, Marina Witkowska, Katarzyna Tzanis, Evan Hellwege, Jacklyn N. Giri, Ayush Edwards, Digna R. Velez Sun, Yan V. Cho, Kelly Gaziano, J. Michael Wilson, Peter W. F. Tsao, Philip S. Kovesdy, Csaba P. Esko, Tonu Magi, Reedik Milani, Lili Almgren, Peter Boutin, Thibaud Debette, Stephanie Ding, Jun Giulianini, Franco Holliday, Elizabeth G. Jackson, Anne U. Li-Gao, Ruifang Lin, Wei-Yu Luan, Jian'an Mangino, Massimo Oldmeadow, Christopher Prins, Bram Peter Qian, Yong Sargurupremraj, Muralidharan Shah, Nabi Surendran, Praveen Theriault, Sebastien Verweij, Niek Willems, Sara M. Zhao, Jing-Hua Amouyel, Philippe Connell, John de Mutsert, Renee Doney, Alex S. F. Farrall, Martin Menni, Cristina Morris, Andrew D. Noordam, Raymond Pare, Guillaume Poulter, Neil R. Shields, Denis C. Stanton, Alice Thom, Simon Abecasis, Goncalo Amin, Najaf Arking, Dan E. Ayers, Kristin L. Barbieri, Caterina M. Batini, Chiara Bis, Joshua C. Blake, Tineka Bochud, Murielle Boehnke, Michael Boerwinkle, Eric Boomsma, Dorret I. Bottinger, Erwin P. Braund, Peter S. Brumat, Marco Campbell, Archie Campbell, Harry Chakravarti, Aravinda Chambers, John C. Chauhan, Ganesh Ciullo, Marina Cocca, Massimiliano Collins, Francis Cordell, Heather J. Davies, Gail de Borst, Martin H. de Geus, Eco J. Deary, Ian J. Deelen, Joris Del Greco, Fabiola M. Demirkale, Cumhur Yusuf Dorr, Marcus Ehret, Georg B. Elosua, Roberto Enroth, Stefan Erzurumluoglu, A. Mesut Ferreira, Teresa Franberg, Mattias Franco, Oscar H. Gandin, Ilaria Gasparini, Paolo Giedraitis, Vilmantas Gieger, Christian Girotto, Giorgia Goel, Anuj Gow, Alan J. Gudnason, Vilmundur Guo, Xiuqing Gyllensten, Ulf Hamsten, Anders Harris, Tamara B. Harris, Sarah E. Hartman, Catharina A. Havulinna, Aki S. Hicks, Andrew A. Hofer, Edith Hofman, Albert Hottenga, Jouke-Jan Huffman, Jennifer E. Hwang, Shih-Jen Ingelsson, Erik James, Alan Jansen Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Imperial College London London UK Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology University of Ioannina Medical School Ioannina Greece William Harvey Research Institute Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry Queen Mary University of London London UK National Institute for Health Research Barts Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Center Queen Mary University of London London UK MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health Imperial College London London UK Department of Mathematics Imperial College London London UK Division of Epidemiology Department of Medicine Institute for Medicine and Public Health Vanderbilt Genetics Institute Vanderbilt University Medical Center Tennessee Valley Healthcare System (626)/Vanderbilt University Nashville TN USA Vanderbilt Genetics Institute Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Vanderbilt University Medical Center Tennessee Valley Health Systems VA Nashville TN USA Department of Epidemiology Emory University Rollins School of Public Health Atlanta GA USA Department of Biomedical Informatics Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta GA USA Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC) VA Boston Healthcare System Boston MA USA Division of Aging Department of Medicine Brigham and Women’s Hospital Department of Medicine Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA Atlanta VAMC and Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute Atlanta GA USA VA Palo Alto Health Care System Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA USA Nephrology Section Memphis VA Medical Center and University of Tennessee Health Science Center Memphis TN USA Estonian Genome Center University of Tartu Tartu Estonia Program in Medical and Population Genetics Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT Cambridge MA USA Department Clinical Sciences Malmö Lund University Malmö Sweden MRC Human Genetics Un

High blood pressure is a highly heritable and modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease. We report the largest genetic association study of blood pressure traits (systolic, diastolic and pulse pressure) to date in over 1 million people of European ancestry. We identify 535 novel blood pressure loci that not only offer new biological insights into blood pressure regulation but also highlight shared genetic architecture between blood pressure and lifestyle exposures. Our findings identify new biological pathways for blood pressure regulation with potential for improved cardiovascular disease prevention in the future.

关键词： Cardiovascular diseases Genome informatics Genome-wide association studies

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

What we should learn from pandemic publishing

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2024年

作者： Sikdar, Satyaki Venturini, Sara Charpignon, Marie-Laure Kumar, Sagar Rinaldi, Francesco Tudisco, Francesco Fortunato, Santo Majumder, Maimuna S. Luddy School of Informatics Computing and Engineering Indiana University BloomingtonIN United States Department of Computer Science Loyola University Chicago ChicagoIL United States Senseable City Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology CambridgeMA United States Department of Mathematics "Tullio Levi-Civita" University of Padova Padova Italy Institute for Data Systems and Society Massachusetts Institute of Technology CambridgeMA United States Network Science Institute Northeastern University BostonMA United States School of Mathematics The University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom School of Mathematics Gran Sasso Science Institute L’Aquila Italy Department of Pediatrics Harvard Medical School BostonMA United States Computational Health Informatics Program Boston Children’s Hospital BostonMA United States

Since the emergence of COVID-19, discussions of ongoing pandemic-related research have accounted for an unprecedented share of media coverage and debate in the public sphere1. The urgency of the pandemic forced researchers to operate on an accelerated timeline, as both policymakers and the public relied on the most current evidence to guide their decisions and behaviors. With high demand for rapid pandemic-related insights and lower barriers to entry via preprint servers, the volume of COVID-19 articles skyrocketed2. The pressing need for research triggered the participation of many researchers with expertise in the science of infectious disease outbreaks (‘outbreak scientists’), who were joined by researchers from other disciplines (‘bellwethers’) and more junior researchers still in training (‘newcomers’) with the common goal of advancing the frontiers of pandemic science and informing policy decisions3. Please see Box 1 for details of this taxonomy. © 2024, CC BY-NC-ND.

关键词： COVID-19

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：