检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

Why is the Winner the Best?

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Why is the Winner the Best?

Conference on computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

作者： M. Eisenmann A. Reinke V. Weru M. D. Tizabi F. Isensee T. J. Adler S. Ali V. Andrearczyk M. Aubreville U. Baid S. Bakas N. Balu S. Bano J. Bernal S. Bodenstedt A. Casella V. Cheplygina M. Daum M. De Bruijne A. Depeursinge R. Dorent J. Egger D. G. Ellis S. Engelhardt M. Ganz N. Ghatwary G. Girard P. Godau A. Gupta L. Hansen K. Harada M. Heinrich N. Heller A. Hering A. Huaulmé P. Jannin A. E. Kavur O. Kodym M. Kozubek J. Li H. Li J. Ma C. Martín-Isla B. Menze A. Noble V. Oreiller N. Padoy S. Pati K. Payette T. Rädsch J. Rafael-Patiño V. Singh Bawa S. Speidel C. H. Sudre K. Van Wijnen M. Wagner D. Wei A. Yamlahi M. H. Yap C. Yuan M. Zenk A. Zia D. Zimmerer D. Aydogan B. Bhattarai L. Bloch R. Brüngel J. Cho C. Choi Q. Dou I. Ezhov C. M. Friedrich C. Fuller R. R. Gaire A. Galdran Á. García Faura M. Grammatikopoulou S. Hong M. Jahanifar I. Jang A. Kadkhodamohammadi I. Kang F. Kofler S. Kondo H. Kuijf M. Li M. Luu T. Martinčič P. Morais M. A. Naser B. Oliveira D. Owen S. Pang J. Park S. Park S. Płotka E. Puybareau N. Rajpoot K. Ryu N. Saeed A. Shephard P. Shi D. Štepec R. Subedi G. Tochon H. R. Torres H. Urien J. L. Vilaça K. A. Wahid H. Wang J. Wang L. Wang X. Wang B. Wiestler M. Wodzinski F. Xia J. Xie Z. Xiong S. Yang Y. Yang Z. Zhao K. Maier-Hein P. F. Jäger A. Kopp-Schneider L. Maier-Hein Division of Intelligent Medical Systems German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Helmholtz Imaging German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Division of Biostatistics German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Division of Medical Image Computing German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences School of Computing University of Leeds Leeds UK Institute of Informatics School of Management HES-SO Valais-Wallis University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland Sierre Switzerland Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Lausanne University Hospital Lausanne Switzerland Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt Ingolstadt Germany Center for Artificial Intelligence and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D) and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA) University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Radiology University of Washington Seattle WA USA Department of Computer Science Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS) University College London London UK Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona & Computer Vision Center Barcelona Spain Division of Translational Surgical Oncology National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC) Dresden Dresden Germany Department of Advanced Robotics Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia Italy Department of Electronics Information and Bioengineering Politecnico di Milano Milan Italy IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Department of General Visceral and Transplantation Surgery Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany Department of Radiology and Nuc

International benchmarking competitions have become fundamental for the comparative performance assessment of image analysis methods. However, little attention has been given to investigating what can be learnt from these competitions. Do they really generate scientific progress? What are common and successful participation strategies? What makes a solution superior to a competing method? To address this gap in the literature, we performed a multicenter study with all 80 competitions that were conducted in the scope of IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021. Statistical analyses performed based on comprehensive descriptions of the submitted algorithms linked to their rank as well as the underlying participation strategies revealed common characteristics of winning solutions. These typically include the use of multi-task learning (63%) and/or multi-stage pipelines (61%), and a focus on augmentation (100%), image preprocessing (97%), data curation (79%), and post-processing (66%). The “typical” lead of a winning team is a computer scientist with a doctoral degree, five years of experience in biomedical image analysis, and four years of experience in deep learning. Two core general development strategies stood out for highly-ranked teams: the reflection of the metrics in the method design and the focus on analyzing and handling failure cases. According to the organizers, 43% of the winning algorithms exceeded the state of the art but only 11% completely solved the respective domain problem. The insights of our study could help researchers (1) improve algorithm development strategies when approaching new problems, and (2) focus on open research questions revealed by this work.

关键词：

Fetal Brain Tissue Annotation and Segmentation Challenge Results

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

arXiv 2022年

作者： Payette, Kelly Li, Hongwei De Dumast, Priscille Licandro, Roxane Ji, Hui Siddiquee, Md Mahfuzur Rahman Xu, Daguang Myronenko, Andriy Liu, Hao Pei, Yuchen Wang, Lisheng Peng, Ying Xie, Juanying Zhang, Huiquan Dong, Guiming Fu, Hao Wang, Guotai Rieu, ZunHyan Kim, Donghyeon Kim, Hyun Gi Karimi, Davood Gholipour, Ali Torres, Helena R. Oliveira, Bruno Vilaça, João L. Lin, Yang Avisdris, Netanell Ben-Zvi, Ori Bashat, Dafna Ben Fidon, Lucas Aertsen, Michael Vercauteren, Tom Sobotka, Daniel Langs, Georg Alenyà, Mireia Villanueva, Maria Inmaculada Camara, Oscar Fadida, Bella Specktor Joskowicz, Leo Weibin, Liao Yi, Lv Xuesong, Li Mazher, Moona Qayyum, Abdul Puig, Domenec Kebiri, Hamza Zhang, Zelin Xu, Xinyi Wu, Dan Liao, KuanLun Wu, YiXuan Chen, JinTai Xu, Yunzhi Zhao, Li Vasung, Lana Menze, Bjoern Cuadra, Meritxell Bach Jakab, Andras Center for MR Research University Children's Hospital Zurich University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland Neuroscience Center Zurich University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland Department of Quantitative Biomedicine University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland Department of Informatics Technical University of Munich Munich Germany Medical Image Analysis Laboratory Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Lausanne University Hospital University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging Lausanne Switzerland Laboratory for Computational Neuroimaging Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School CharlestownMA United States Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria Arizona State University United States NVIDIA United States Shanghai Jiaotong University China School of Computer Science Shaanxi Normal University Xi'An710119 China Research Institute NEUROPHET Inc. Seoul06247 Korea Republic of Department of Radiology The Catholic University of Korea Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital Seoul06247 Korea Republic of Boston Children's Hospital Harvard Medical School BostonMA United States 2Ai - School of Technology IPCA Barcelos Portugal Algoritmi Center School of Engineering University of Minho Guimarães Portugal School of Medicine University of Minho Braga Portugal ICVS 3B's - PT Government Associate Laboratory Guimarães Braga Portugal School of Computer Science and Engineering The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Israel Sagol Brain Institute Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center Israel Sagol School of Neuroscience Tel Aviv University Israel Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University Israel School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences King's College London LondonSE1 7EU United Kingdom Department of Radiology University Hospitals Leuven Leuven3000 Belgium Computational Imaging Research Lab Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy Medical

In-utero fetal MRI is emerging as an important tool in the diagnosis and analysis of the developing human brain. Automatic segmentation of the developing fetal brain is a vital step in the quantitative analysis of prenatal neurodevelopment both in the research and clinical context. However, manual segmentation of cerebral structures is time-consuming and prone to error and inter-observer variability. Therefore, we organized the Fetal Tissue Annotation (FeTA) Challenge in 2021 in order to encourage the development of automatic segmentation algorithms on an international level. The challenge utilized FeTA Dataset, an open dataset of fetal brain MRI reconstructions segmented into seven different tissues (external cerebrospinal fluid, grey matter, white matter, ventricles, cerebellum, brainstem, deep grey matter). 20 international teams participated in this challenge, submitting a total of 21 algorithms for evaluation. In this paper, we provide a detailed analysis of the results from both a technical and clinical perspective. All participants relied on deep learning methods, mainly U-Nets, with some variability present in the network architecture, optimization, and image pre- and post-processing. The majority of teams used existing medical imaging deep learning frameworks. The main differences between the submissions were the fine tuning done during training, and the specific pre- and post-processing steps performed. The challenge results showed that almost all submissions performed similarly. Four of the top five teams used ensemble learning methods. However, one team's algorithm performed significantly superior to the other submissions, and consisted of an asymmetrical U-Net network architecture. This paper provides a first of its kind benchmark for future automatic multi-tissue segmentation algorithms for the developing human brain in utero. © 2022, CC BY.

关键词： Magnetic resonance imaging

Common Limitations of image processing Metrics: A Picture Story

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

arXiv 2021年

作者： Reinke, Annika Tizabi, Minu D. Sudre, Carole H. Eisenmann, Matthias Rädsch, Tim Baumgartner, Michael Acion, Laura Antonelli, Michela Arbel, Tal Bakas, Spyridon Bankhead, Peter Benis, Arriel Blaschko, Matthew Buettner, Florian Cardoso, M. Jorge Chen, Jianxu Cheplygina, Veronika Christodoulou, Evangelia Cimini, Beth A. Collins, Gary S. Engelhardt, Sandy Farahani, Keyvan Ferrer, Luciana Galdran, Adrian van Ginneken, Bram Glocker, Ben Godau, Patrick Haase, Robert Hamprecht, Fred Hashimoto, Daniel A. Heckmann-Nötzel, Doreen Hirsch, Peter Hoffman, Michael M. Huisman, Merel Isensee, Fabian Jannin, Pierre Kahn, Charles E. Kainmueller, Dagmar Kainz, Bernhard Karargyris, Alexandros Karthikesalingam, Alan Kavur, A. Emre Kenngott, Hannes Kleesiek, Jens Kleppe, Andreas Koehler, Sven Kofler, Florian Kopp-Schneider, Annette Kooi, Thijs Kozubek, Michal Kreshuk, Anna Kurc, Tahsin Landman, Bennett A. Litjens, Geert Madani, Amin Maier-Hein, Klaus Martel, Anne L. Mattson, Peter Meijering, Erik Menze, Bjoern Moher, David Moons, Karel G.M. Müller, Henning Nichyporuk, Brennan Nickel, Felix Noyan, M. Alican Petersen, Jens Polat, Gorkem Rafelski, Susanne M. Rajpoot, Nasir Reyes, Mauricio Rieke, Nicola Riegler, Michael A. Rivaz, Hassan Saez-Rodriguez, Julio Sánchez, Clara I. Schroeter, Julien Saha, Anindo Selver, M. Alper Sharan, Lalith Shetty, Shravya Smeden, Maarten V.A.N. Stieltjes, Bram Summers, Ronald M. Taha, Abdel A. Tiulpin, Aleksei Tsaftaris, Sotirios A. Calster, Ben V.A.N. Varoquaux, Gaël Wiesenfarth, Manuel Yaniv, Ziv R. Jäger, Paul Maier-Hein, Lena Division of Intelligent Medical Systems and HI Helmholtz Imaging Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Division of Intelligent Medical Systems Heidelberg Germany NCT Heidelberg DKFZ University Medical Center Heidelberg Germany MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing Department of Computer Science University College London London United Kingdom School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Science King’s College London London United Kingdom Division of Medical Image Computing Heidelberg Germany Instituto de Cálculo CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina Centre for Medical Image Computing University College London London United Kingdom McGill University Montréal Canada Division of Computational Pathology Dept of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine IU Health Information and Translational Sciences Building Indianapolis United States University of Pennsylvania Richards Medical Research Laboratories FL7 PhiladelphiaPA United States Institute of Genetics and Cancer University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom Department of Digital Medical Technologies Holon Institute of Technology Holon Israel European Federation for Medical Informatics Le Mont-sur-Lausanne Switzerland Center for Processing Speech and Images Department of Electrical Engineering KU Leuven Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - box 2441 Leuven3001 Belgium Frankfurt/Mainz DKFZ UCT Frankfurt-Marburg Germany Heidelberg Germany Goethe University Frankfurt Department of Medicine Germany Goethe University Frankfurt Department of Informatics Germany Frankfurt Cancer Insititute Germany Leibniz-Institut für Analytische Wissenschaften – ISAS – e.V. Dortmund Germany Department of Computer Science IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Imaging Platform Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard CambridgeMA United States Centre for St

While the importance of automatic image analysis is continuously increasing, recent meta-research revealed major flaws with respect to algorithm validation. Performance metrics are particularly key for meaningful, objective, and transparent performance assessment and validation of the used automatic algorithms, but relatively little attention has been given to the practical pitfalls when using specific metrics for a given image analysis task. These are typically related to (1) the disregard of inherent metric properties, such as the behaviour in the presence of class imbalance or small target structures, (2) the disregard of inherent data set properties, such as the non-independence of the test cases, and (3) the disregard of the actual biomedical domain interest that the metrics should reflect. This living dynamically document has the purpose to illustrate important limitations of performance metrics commonly applied in the field of image analysis. In this context, it focuses on biomedical image analysis problems that can be phrased as image-level classification, semantic segmentation, instance segmentation, or object detection task. The current version is based on a Delphi process on metrics conducted by an international consortium of image analysis experts from more than 60 institutions worldwide. © 2021, CC BY.

关键词： Medical imaging

The medical segmentation decathlon

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

arXiv 2021年

作者： Antonelli, Michela Reinke, Annika Bakas, Spyridon Farahani, Keyvan Kopp-Schneider, Annette Landman, Bennett A. Litjens, Geert Menze, Bjoern Ronneberger, Olaf Summers, Ronald M. van Ginneken, Bram Bilello, Michel Bilic, Patrick Christ, Patrick F. Do, Richard K.G. Gollub, Marc J. Heckers, Stephan H. Huisman, Henkjan Jarnagin, William R. McHugo, Maureen K. Napel, Sandy Golia Pernicka, Jennifer S. Rhode, Kawal Tobon-Gomez, Catalina Vorontsov, Eugene Hulsmon, Hankan Meakin, James A. Ourselin, Sebastien Wiesenfarth, Manuel Arbeláez, Pablo Bae, Byeonguk Chen, Sihong Daza, Laura Feng, Jianjiang He, Baochun Isensee, Fabian Ji, Yuanfeng Jia, Fucang Kim, Namkug Kim, Ildoo Merhof, Dorit Pai, Akshay Park, Beomhee Perslev, Mathias Rezaiifar, Ramin Rippel, Oliver Sarasua, Ignacio Shen, Wei Son, Jaemin Wachinger, Christian Wang, Liansheng Wang, Yan Xia, Yingda Xu, Daguang Xu, Zhanwei Zheng, Yefeng Simpson, Amber L. Maier-Hein, Lena Cardoso, M. Jorge School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences King’s College London London United Kingdom Heidelberg Germany Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science University of Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States BethesdaMD United States Heidelberg Germany Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Vanderbilt University NashvilleTN United States Radboud University Medical Center Radboud Institute for Health Sciences Nijmegen Netherlands Quantitative Biomedicine University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland DeepMind London United Kingdom School of Computing Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences Queen’s University KingstonON Canada Department of Surgery Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New YorkNY United States BethesdaMD United States Department of Informatics Technische Universität München Germany Department of Radiology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New YorkNY United States Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences Vanderbilt University Medical Center NashvilleTN United States Department of Radiology Stanford University StanfordCA United States Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering École Polytechnique de Montréal Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Medical Faculty University of Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany VUNO Inc. Seoul Korea Republic of Universidad de los Andes Colombia Department of Automation Tsinghua University Beijing China Heidelberg Germany Department of Computer Science Xiamen University Xiamen361005 China Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology Chinese Academy of Sciences Shenzhen China Kakao Brain Korea Republic of Institute of Imaging & Computer Vision RWTH Aachen University Aachen Germany Cere

International challenges have become the de facto standard for comparative assessment of image analysis algorithms given a specific task. Segmentation is so far the most widely investigated medical image processing task, but the various segmentation challenges have typically been organized in isolation, such that algorithm development was driven by the need to tackle a single specific clinical problem. We hypothesized that a method capable of performing well on multiple tasks will generalize well to a previously unseen task and potentially outperform a custom-designed solution. To investigate the hypothesis, we organized the Medical Segmentation Decathlon (MSD)—a biomedical image analysis challenge, in which algorithms compete in a multitude of both tasks and modalities. The underlying data set was designed to explore the axis of difficulties typically encountered when dealing with medical images, such as small data sets, unbalanced labels, multi-site data and small objects. The MSD challenge confirmed that algorithms with a consistent good performance on a set of tasks preserved their good average performance on a different set of previously unseen tasks. Moreover, by monitoring the MSD winner for two years, we found that this algorithm continued generalizing well to a wide range of other clinical problems, further confirming our hypothesis. Three main conclusions can be drawn from this study: (1) state-of-the-art image segmentation algorithms are mature, accurate, and generalize well when retrained on unseen tasks;(2) consistent algorithmic performance across multiple tasks is a strong surrogate of algorithmic generalizability;(3) the training of accurate AI segmentation models is now commoditized to non AI *** Codes 68T07. © 2021, CC BY-NC-SA.

关键词： image segmentation

BigNeuron: a resource to benchmark and predict performance of algorithms for automated tracing of neurons in light microscopy datasets

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Nature methods 2023年第6期20卷 824-835页

作者： Linus Manubens-Gil Zhi Zhou Hanbo Chen Arvind Ramanathan Xiaoxiao Liu Yufeng Liu Alessandro Bria Todd Gillette Zongcai Ruan Jian Yang Miroslav Radojević Ting Zhao Li Cheng Lei Qu Siqi Liu Kristofer E Bouchard Lin Gu Weidong Cai Shuiwang Ji Badrinath Roysam Ching-Wei Wang Hongchuan Yu Amos Sironi Daniel Maxim Iascone Jie Zhou Erhan Bas Eduardo Conde-Sousa Paulo Aguiar Xiang Li Yujie Li Sumit Nanda Yuan Wang Leila Muresan Pascal Fua Bing Ye Hai-Yan He Jochen F Staiger Manuel Peter Daniel N Cox Michel Simonneau Marcel Oberlaender Gregory Jefferis Kei Ito Paloma Gonzalez-Bellido Jinhyun Kim Edwin Rubel Hollis T Cline Hongkui Zeng Aljoscha Nern Ann-Shyn Chiang Jianhua Yao Jane Roskams Rick Livesey Janine Stevens Tianming Liu Chinh Dang Yike Guo Ning Zhong Georgia Tourassi Sean Hill Michael Hawrylycz Christof Koch Erik Meijering Giorgio A Ascoli Hanchuan Peng Institute for Brain and Intelligence Southeast University Nanjing China. Microsoft Corporation Redmond WA USA. Tencent AI Lab Bellevue WA USA. Computing Environment and Life Sciences Directorate Argonne National Laboratory Lemont IL USA. Kaya Medical Seattle WA USA. University of Cassino and Southern Lazio Cassino Italy. Center for Neural Informatics Structures and Plasticity Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study George Mason University Fairfax VA USA. Faculty of Information Technology Beijing University of Technology Beijing China. Beijing International Collaboration Base on Brain Informatics and Wisdom Services Beijing China. Nuctech Netherlands Rotterdam the Netherlands. Janelia Research Campus Howard Hughes Medical Institute Ashburn VA USA. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada. Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Intelligent Computation and Signal Processing Anhui University Hefei China. Paige AI New York NY USA. Scientific Data Division and Biological Systems and Engineering Division Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Berkeley CA USA. Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute and Redwood Center for Theoretical Neuroscience UC Berkeley Berkeley CA USA. RIKEN AIP Tokyo Japan. Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology (RCAST) The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan. School of Computer Science University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia. Texas A&M University College Station TX USA. Cullen College of Engineering University of Houston Houston TX USA. Graduate Institute of Biomedical Engineering National Taiwan University of Science and Technology Taipei Taiwan. National Centre for Computer Animation Bournemouth University Poole UK. PROPHESEE Paris France. Department of Neuroscience Columbia University New York NY USA. Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute Columbia University New York NY USA. Department of Computer Science Northern Illinois Universit

BigNeuron is an open community bench-testing platform with the goal of setting open standards for accurate and fast automatic neuron tracing. We gathered a diverse set of image volumes across several species that is representative of the data obtained in many neuroscience laboratories interested in neuron tracing. Here, we report generated gold standard manual annotations for a subset of the available imaging datasets and quantified tracing quality for 35 automatic tracing algorithms. The goal of generating such a hand-curated diverse dataset is to advance the development of tracing algorithms and enable generalizable benchmarking. Together with image quality features, we pooled the data in an interactive web application that enables users and developers to perform principal component analysis, t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding, correlation and clustering, visualization of imaging and tracing data, and benchmarking of automatic tracing algorithms in user-defined data subsets. The image quality metrics explain most of the variance in the data, followed by neuromorphological features related to neuron size. We observed that diverse algorithms can provide complementary information to obtain accurate results and developed a method to iteratively combine methods and generate consensus reconstructions. The consensus trees obtained provide estimates of the neuron structure ground truth that typically outperform single algorithms in noisy datasets. However, specific algorithms may outperform the consensus tree strategy in specific imaging conditions. Finally, to aid users in predicting the most accurate automatic tracing results without manual annotations for comparison, we used support vector machine regression to predict reconstruction quality given an image volume and a set of automatic tracings.

关键词：

The Brain Tumor Sequence Registration (BraTS-Reg) Challenge: Establishing Correspondence Between Pre-Operative and Follow-up MRI Scans of Diffuse Glioma Patients

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

arXiv 2021年

作者： Baheti, Bhakti Chakrabarty, Satrajit Akbari, Hamed Bilello, Michel Wiestler, Benedikt Schwarting, Julian Calabrese, Evan Rudie, Jeffrey Abidi, Syed Mousa, Mina Villanueva-Meyer, Javier Fields, Brandon K.K. Kofler, Florian Shinohara, Russell Takeshi Iglesias, Juan Eugenio Mok, Tony C.W. Chung, Albert C.S. Wodzinski, Marek Jurgas, Artur Marini, Niccolò Atzori, Manfredo Müller, Henning Grosbröhmer, Christoph Siebert, Hanna Hansen, Lasse Heinrich, Mattias P. Canalini, Luca Klein, Jan Gerken, Annika Heldmann, Stefan Hering, Alessa Hahn, Horst K. Meng, Mingyuan Bi, Lei Feng, Dagan Kim, Jinman Zeineldinal, Ramy A. Karar, Mohamed E. Mathis-Ullrich, Franziska Burgert, Oliver Abderezaei, Javid Pionteck, Aymeric Chopra, Agamdeep Kurt, Mehmet Yan, Kewei Yan, Yonghong Tang, Zhe Ma, Jianqiang Nasser, Sahar Almahfouz Kurian, Nikhil Cherian Meena, Mohit Shamsi, Saqib Sethi, Amit Tustison, Nicholas J. Avants, Brian B. Cook, Philip Gee, James C. Tian, Lin Greer, Hastings Niethammer, Marc Hoopesar, Andrew Hoffmannas, Malte Dalcaar, Adrian V. Christodoulidis, Stergios Estiene, Théo Vakalopoulou, Maria Paragios, Nikos Marcus, Daniel S. Davatzikos, Christos Sotiras, Aristeidis Menze, Bjoern Bakas, Spyridon Waldmannstetter, Diana Division of Computational Pathology Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine IndianapolisIN United States Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering Washington University in St. Louis St. LouisMO United States GE HealthCare San RamonCA United States University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology Washington University School of Medicine St. LouisMO United States Institute for Informatics Data Science & Biostatistics Washington University School of Medicine St. LouisMO United States Department of Bioengineering Santa Clara University Santa ClaraCA United States Department of Quantitative Biomedicine University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland Department of Computer Science TUM School of Computation Information and Technology Technical University of Munich Munich Germany Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology School of Medicine Klinikum rechts der Isar Technical University of Munich Munich Germany Department of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital Regensburg Regensburg Germany University Hospital Regensburg Regensburg Germany Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging University of California San FranciscoCA United States Department of Radiology Duke University Medical Center DurhamNC United States Department of Radiology University of California San DiegoCA United States Helmholtz AI Helmholtz Munich Neuherberg Germany Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center Department of Biostatistics Epidemiology and Informatics University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia United States Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School United States Centre for Medical Imaging Computing University College London United Kingdom The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Hong Kong University of Applied Sciences West

Registration of longitudinal brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans containing pathologies is challenging due to dramatic changes in tissue appearance. Although there has been considerable progress in developing general-purpose medical image registration techniques, they have not yet attained the requisite precision and reliability for this task, highlighting its inherent complexity. Here we describe the Brain Tumor Sequence Registration (BraTS-Reg) challenge, as the first public benchmark environment for deformable registration algorithms focusing on estimating correspondences between pre-operative and follow-up scans of the same patient diagnosed with a diffuse brain glioma. The challenge was conducted in conjunction with both the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2022 and the International Conference on Medical image Computing and computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2022. The BraTS-Reg data comprise de-identified multi-institutional multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) scans, curated for size and resolution according to a canonical anatomical template, and divided into training, validation, and testing sets. Clinical experts annotated ground truth (GT) landmark points of anatomical locations distinct across the temporal domain. The training data with their GT annotations, were publicly released to enable the development of registration algorithms. The validation data, without their GT annotations, were also released to allow for algorithmic evaluation prior to the testing phase, which only allowed submission of containerized algorithms for evaluation on hidden hold-out testing data. Quantitative evaluation and ranking was based on the Median Euclidean Error (MEE), Robustness, and the determinant of the Jacobian of the displacement field. The top-ranked methodologies yielded similar performance across all evaluation metrics and shared several methodological commonalities, including pre-alignment, deep neural networks, inverse consistency

关键词： Magnetic resonance imaging

QU-BraTS: MICCAI BraTS 2020 Challenge on Quantifying Uncertainty in Brain Tumor Segmentation - analysis of Ranking Scores and Benchmarking Results

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

arXiv 2021年

作者： Mehta, Raghav Filos, Angelos Baid, Ujjwal Sako, Chiharu McKinley, Richard Rebsamen, Michael Dätwyler, Katrin Meier, Raphael Radojewski, Piotr Murugesan, Gowtham Krishnan Nalawade, Sahil Ganesh, Chandan Wagner, Ben Yu, Fang F. Fei, Baowei Madhuranthakam, Ananth J. Maldjian, Joseph A. Daza, Laura Gómez, Catalina Arbeláez, Pablo Dai, Chengliang Wang, Shuo Reynaud, Hadrien Mo, Yuanhan Angelini, Elsa Guo, Yike Bai, Wenjia Banerjee, Subhashis Pei, Linmin Murat, A.K. Rosas-González, Sarahi Zemmoura, Ilyess Tauber, Clovis Vu, Minh H. Nyholm, Tufve Löfstedt, Tommy Ballestar, Laura Mora Vilaplana, Veronica McHugh, Hugh Talou, Gonzalo Maso Wang, Alan Patel, Jay Chang, Ken Hoebel, Katharina Gidwani, Mishka Arun, Nishanth Gupta, Sharut Aggarwal, Mehak Singh, Praveer Gerstner, Elizabeth R. Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree Boutry, Nicolas Huard, Alexis Vidyaratne, Lasitha Rahman, Md Monibor Iftekharuddin, Khan M. Chazalon, Joseph Puybareau, Elodie Tochon, Guillaume Ma, Jun Cabezas, Mariano Llado, Xavier Oliver, Arnau Valencia, Liliana Valverde, Sergi Amian, Mehdi Soltaninejad, Mohammadreza Myronenko, Andriy Hatamizadeh, Ali Feng, Xue Dou, Quan Tustison, Nicholas Meyer, Craig Shah, Nisarg A. Talbar, Sanjay Weber, Marc-André Mahajan, Abhishek Jakab, Andras Wiest, Roland Fathallah-Shaykh, Hassan M. Nazeri, Arash Milchenko, Mikhail Marcus, Daniel Kotrotsou, Aikaterini Colen, Rivka Freymann, John Kirby, Justin Davatzikos, Christos Menze, Bjoern Bakas, Spyridon Gal, Yarin Arbel, Tal McGill University MontrealQC Canada Group University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine The University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology University of Bern Inselspital Bern University Hospital Bern Switzerland Department of Radiology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center DallasTX United States Department of Bioengineering University of Texas DallasTX United States Advanced Imaging Research Center University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center DallasTX United States Universidad de los Andes Bogotá Colombia Data Science Institute Imperial College London London United Kingdom NIHR Imperial BRC ITMAT Data Science Group Imperial College London London United Kingdom Department of Brain Sciences Imperial College London London United Kingdom Machine Intelligence Unit Indian Statistical Institute Kolkata India Department of CSE University of Calcutta Kolkata India Department of Information Technology Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden Department of Diagnostic Radiology The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center PittsburghPA United States UMR U1253 iBrain Université de Tours Inserm Tours France Department of Radiation Sciences Umeå University Umeå Sweden Department of Computing Science Umeå University Umeå Sweden Signal Theory and Communications Department Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Barcelona Tech Barcelona Spain Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand Radiology Department Auckland City Hospital Auckland New Zealand Auckland Bioengineering Institute University of Auckland New Zealand Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging Department of Radiology

Deep learning (DL) models have provided state-of-the-art performance in various medical imaging benchmarking challenges, including the Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenges. However, the task of focal pathology multi-compartment segmentation (e.g., tumor and lesion sub-regions) is particularly challenging, and potential errors hinder translating DL models into clinical workflows. Quantifying the reliability of DL model predictions in the form of uncertainties could enable clinical review of the most uncertain regions, thereby building trust and paving the way toward clinical translation. Several uncertainty estimation methods have recently been introduced for DL medical image segmentation tasks. Developing scores to evaluate and compare the performance of uncertainty measures will assist the end-user in making more informed decisions. In this study, we explore and evaluate a score developed during the BraTS 2019 and BraTS 2020 task on uncertainty quantification (QU-BraTS) and designed to assess and rank uncertainty estimates for brain tumor multi-compartment segmentation. This score (1) rewards uncertainty estimates that produce high confidence in correct assertions and those that assign low confidence levels at incorrect assertions, and (2) penalizes uncertainty measures that lead to a higher percentage of under-confident correct assertions. We further benchmark the segmentation uncertainties generated by 14 independent participating teams of QU-BraTS 2020, all of which also participated in the main BraTS segmentation task. Overall, our findings confirm the importance and complementary value that uncertainty estimates provide to segmentation algorithms, highlighting the need for uncertainty quantification in medical image analyses. Finally, in favor of transparency and reproducibility, our evaluation code is made publicly available at https://***/RagMeh11/QU-BraTS. © 2021, CC BY.

关键词： Benchmarking

Author Correction: Why rankings of biomedical image analysis competitions should be interpreted with care

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Nature communications 2019年第1期10卷 588页

作者： Lena Maier-Hein Matthias Eisenmann Annika Reinke Sinan Onogur Marko Stankovic Patrick Scholz Tal Arbel Hrvoje Bogunovic Andrew P Bradley Aaron Carass Carolin Feldmann Alejandro F Frangi Peter M Full Bram van Ginneken Allan Hanbury Katrin Honauer Michal Kozubek Bennett A Landman Keno März Oskar Maier Klaus Maier-Hein Bjoern H Menze Henning Müller Peter F Neher Wiro Niessen Nasir Rajpoot Gregory C Sharp Korsuk Sirinukunwattana Stefanie Speidel Christian Stock Danail Stoyanov Abdel Aziz Taha Fons van der Sommen Ching-Wei Wang Marc-André Weber Guoyan Zheng Pierre Jannin Annette Kopp-Schneider Division of Computer Assisted Medical Interventions (CAMI) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) 69120 Heidelberg Germany. l.maier-hein@dkfz.de. Division of Computer Assisted Medical Interventions (CAMI) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) 69120 Heidelberg Germany. Centre for Intelligent Machines McGill University Montreal QC H3A0G4 Canada. Christian Doppler Laboratory for Ophthalmic Image Analysis Department of Ophthalmology Medical University Vienna 1090 Vienna Austria. Science and Engineering Faculty Queensland University of Technology Brisbane QLD 4001 Australia. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Department of Computer Science Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD 21218 USA. CISTIB - Center for Computational Imaging & Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine The University of Leeds Leeds Yorkshire LS2 9JT UK. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Medical Image Analysis Radboud University Center 6525 GA Nijmegen The Netherlands. Institute of Information Systems Engineering TU Wien 1040 Vienna Austria. Complexity Science Hub Vienna 1080 Vienna Austria. Heidelberg Collaboratory for Image Processing (HCI Heidelberg University 69120 Heidelberg Germany. Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis Masaryk University 60200 Brno Czech Republic. Electrical Engineering Vanderbilt University Nashville TN 37235-1679 USA. Institute of Medical Informatics Universität zu Lübeck 23562 Lübeck Germany. Division of Medical Image Computing (MIC) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) 69120 Heidelberg Germany. Institute for Advanced Studies Department of Informatics Technical University of Munich 80333 Munich Germany. Information System Institute HES-SO Sierre 3960 Switzerland. Departments of Radiology Nuclear Medicine and Medical Informatics Erasmus MC 3015 GD Rotterdam The Netherlands. Department of Computer Science University of Warwick Coventry CV4 7AL UK. Department of Radiation Oncology Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA

In the original version of this Article the values in the rightmost column of Table 1 were inadvertently shifted relative to the other columns. This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.

关键词：

Identifying the best machine learning algorithms for brain tumor segmentation, progression assessment, and overall survival prediction in the BRATS challenge

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

arXiv 2018年

作者： Bakas, Spyridon Reyes, Mauricio Jakab, Andras Bauer, Stefan Rempfler, Markus Crimi, Alessandro Shinohara, Russell Takeshi Berger, Christoph Ha, Sung Min Rozycki, Martin Prastawa, Marcel Alberts, Esther Lipkova, Jana Freymann, John Kirby, Justin Bilello, Michel Fathallah-Shaykh, Hassan M. Wiest, Roland Kirschke, Jan Wiestler, Benedikt Colen, Rivka Kotrotsou, Aikaterini Lamontagne, Pamela Marcus, Daniel Milchenko, Mikhail Nazeri, Arash Weber, Marc-Andr Mahajan, Abhishek Baid, Ujjwal Gerstner, Elizabeth Kwon, Dongjin Acharya, Gagan Agarwal, Manu Alam, Mahbubul Albiol, Alberto Albiol, Antonio Albiol, Francisco J. Alex, Varghese Allinson, Nigel Amorim, Pedro H.A. Amrutkar, Abhijit Anand, Ganesh Andermatt, Simon Arbel, Tal Arbelaez, Pablo Avery, Aaron Azmat, Muneeza Pranjal, B. Bai, Wenjia Banerjee, Subhashis Barth, Bill Batchelder, Thomas Batmanghelich, Kayhan Battistella, Enzo Beers, Andrew Belyaev, Mikhail Bendszus, Martin Benson, Eze Bernal, Jose Bharath, Halandur Nagaraja Biros, George Bisdas, Sotirios Brown, James Cabezas, Mariano Cao, Shilei Cardoso, Jorge M. Carver, Eric N. Casamitjana, Adri Castillo, Laura Silvana Cat, Marcel Cattin, Philippe Cérigues, Albert Chagas, Vinicius S. Chandra, Siddhartha Chang, Yi-Ju Chang, Shiyu Chang, Ken Chazalon, Joseph Chen, Shengcong Chen, Wei Chen, Jefferson W. Chen, Zhaolin Cheng, Kun Choudhury, Ahana Roy Chylla, Roger Clrigues, Albert Colleman, Steven Colmeiro, Ramiro German Rodriguez Combalia, Marc Costa, Anthony Cui, Xiaomeng Dai, Zhenzhen Dai, Lutao Daza, Laura Alexandra Deutsch, Eric Ding, Changxing Dong, Chao Dong, Shidu Dudzik, Wojciech Eaton-Rosen, Zach Egan, Gary Escudero, Guilherme Estienne, Tho Everson, Richard Fabrizio, Jonathan Fan, Yong Fang, Longwei Feng, Xue Ferrante, Enzo Fidon, Lucas Fischer, Martin French, Andrew P. Fridman, Naomi Fu, Huan Fuentes, David Gao, Yaozong Gates, Evan Gering, David Gholami, Amir Gierke, Willi Glocker, Ben Gong, Mingming Gonzlez-Vill, Sandra Grosges, T. Guan, Yuanfang Guo, Sheng Gupta, Sudeep Han, Woo-Sup Han, Il Song Harmuth, Ko Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics University of Bern Bern Switzerland Center for MR-Research University Children's Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland Support Centre for Advanced Neuroimaging Inselspital Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology Bern University Hospital Bern Switzerland University Hospital of Zurich Zurich Switzerland Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia United States Image-Based Biomedical Modeling Group Technical University of Munich Munich Germany Icahn School of Medicine Mount Sinai Health System New YorkNY United States Leidos Biomedical Research Inc. Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research FrederickMD21701 United States Cancer Imaging Program National Cancer Institute National Institutes of Health BethesdaMD20814 United States Department of Neurology University of Alabama at Birmingham BirminghamAL United States Department of Diagnostic Radiology University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center HoustonTX United States Department of Psychology Washington University St. LouisMO United States Neuroimaging Informatics and Analysis Center Washington University St. LouisMO United States Department of Radiology Washington University St. LouisMO United States Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Pediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology University Medical Center Rostock Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 6 Rostock18057 Germany Tata Memorial Centre Homi Bhabha National Institute Mumbai India Shri Guru Gobind Singhji Institute of Engineering and Technology Nanded India NVIDIA Santa Clara

Gliomas are the most common primary brain malignancies, with different degrees of aggressiveness, variable prognosis and various heterogeneous histologic sub-regions, i.e., peritumoral edematous/invaded tissue, necrotic core, active and non-enhancing core. This intrinsic heterogeneity is also portrayed in their radio-phenotype, as their sub-regions are depicted by varying intensity profiles disseminated across multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) scans, reflecting varying biological properties. Their heterogeneous shape, extent, and location are some of the factors that make these tumors difficult to resect, and in some cases inoperable. The amount of resected tumor is a factor also considered in longitudinal scans, when evaluating the apparent tumor for potential diagnosis of progression. Furthermore, there is mounting evidence that accurate segmentation of the various tumor sub-regions can offer the basis for quantitative image analysis towards prediction of patient overall survival. This study assesses the state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) methods used for brain tumor image analysis in mpMRI scans, during the last seven instances of the International Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge, i.e., 2012-2018. Specifically, we focus on i) evaluating segmentations of the various glioma sub-regions in pre-operative mpMRI scans, ii) assessing potential tumor progression by virtue of longitudinal growth of tumor sub-regions, beyond use of the RECIST/RANO criteria, and iii) predicting the overall survival from pre-operative mpMRI scans of patients that underwent gross total resection. Finally, we investigate the challenge of identifying the best ML algorithms for each of these tasks, considering that apart from being diverse on each instance of the challenge, the multi-institutional mpMRI BraTS dataset has also been a continuously evolving/growing dataset. Copyright © 2018, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Tumors