检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1994年第3期106卷 296-308页

作者： CHATTERTON, PA PAQUETTE, RG Paul A. Chatterton:received a BS degree in civil engineering from Northeastern University in 1968 and a MS in naval architecture & marine engineering from the University of Michigan in 1971. He joined what is now the NavSea SEA 03D organization in 1967 in the Submarine Preliminary Design Group. He has held positions on a variety of programs including Trident AO-177 and RSNF PCG and was the head of the Auxiliary Ship Preliminary Design Section. Prior to becoming theSea Shadowdeputy program manager in 1985 he was the ship design manager for the T-AGOS 19. He assumed his current position asSea Shadowprogram manager in 1991. Richard G. Paquette:received a BSE degree in mechanical/electrical engineering from General Motors Institute in 1972 and an MS in naval architecture and marine engineering from the University of Michigan in 1977. From 1967 through 1976 he held a variety of engineering and management positions at General Motors primarily in the plant engineering and noise control areas. After graduate school he spent a year at Ingalls Shipbuilding performing engineering for nuclear submarine overhauls. Since 1978 he has worked for Lockheed Missiles & Space Co. in a variety of technical and management assignments on advanced ship and subsurface programs. He was chief engineer during the original construction and operation of theSea Shadowand returned as the Lockheed Program manager for the current efforts. He is a member of the American Society of Naval Engineers the Naval Institute the American Defense Preparedness Association and is a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of California.

The Sea Shadow (designed, built and tested during the mid-1980s) represents the application of several advanced ship technologies. The Sea Shadow was recently reactivated and has been undergoing additional testing at Santa Cruz Island and in San Francisco Bay. This paper provides a top level description of the ship and ship systems, is supported by photos & sketches, and alludes to the types of data and experience base which exists. The presentation of the paper includes video of the exterior and interior of the ship, the ship systems, and its at-sea operations.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

ADVANCED AVIONICS ARCHITECTURE - THE NAVAIR STUDY

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1994年第6期106卷 31-40页

作者： KATZ, RS JAHNKE, L JEWETT, CE Cdr. Larry Jahnke USN:is presently Head of the Architecture Branch of the Avionics Engineering division AIR-546 of the Naval Air Systems Command. Among his current responsibilities is to lead implementation activities of the NAVAIR Advanced Avionics Architecture study described in this paper. Cdr. Jahnke graduated from the University of Minnesota with a B.S. degree in aeronautical engineering and was commissioned in 1974. After flight training as a Naval flight officer he was assigned to Naval Air Station Barbers Point Hawaii where he served as Tactical Coordinator for P-3B aircraft. He was assigned to the Communications Directorate of the Joint Staff in 1990 where he participated in support of Desert Shield/Desert Storm and was part of the original cadre of officers responsible for the “C41 for the Warrior” concept. Cdr. Jahnke also has a Master of Science degree from the University of Southern California and is a 1990 graduate of the Industrial College of the Armed Forces. Cdr. Charles E. Jewett USN:is currently the Common Avionics Requirements Officer for Naval Aircraft Programs. He has served the Navy as an Aeronautical Engineering Duty Officer since 1982 with previous defense acquisition assignments as the Avionics Architecture and Engineering Branch Head Fighter/Attack Avionics systems Engineering Branch Head and A-12 Avionics Officer and A-6F Deputy Program Manager and the A-6 Avionics Officer. Cdr. Jewett entered the Navy as an Aviation Officer Candidate in 1971 receiving his commission and earning his wings as a Naval Flight Officer the same year. After graduating from the U.S. Naval Test Pilot School in 1976 he was assigned to the Strike Aircraft Test Directorate of the Naval Air Test Center where he participated in various electronic warfare electro-optics and software update evaluations for A-6 EA-6B and OV-10 aircraft. In Cdr. Jewett's previous assignment at NAVAIRSYSCOM he led a major Avionics Architecture Study (the subject of this paper) that surveyed cutting-edge avionics technol

To establish a planning basis for future avionics systems, the Naval Air systems Command (NAVAIR) conducted an avionics architecture investigation during 1992-1993, culminating in a final report published in August 1993. In the course of the study, U.S. Industry provided significant information to a NAVAIR avionics database for both technologies and systems integration methods. From the study emerged an implementation strategy to allow NAVAIR to develop effective avionics systems in the future that use commercial products and standards where applicable but also allow the ready use of new and emerging technologies. Recommended strategies concentrate on the development process, especially the use of sound systems engineering techniques and the maximum practical use of commercial standards and products. This paper reviews the methodology employed during the NAVAIR investigation, and presents the key findings and resulting implementation strategies. The paper concludes with a brief summary of current implementation plans at NAVAIR.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

LIVE FIRE TEST AND EVALUATION FOR SHIPS

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1994年第3期106卷 228-245页

作者： BLOOM, JB REESE, RM HOPKINS, TM Joel B. Bloom:is a staff specialist in the Office of the Deputy Director Land and Maritime Programs Test and Evaluation Directorate of the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD). He is the OSD action officer for developmental testing including live fire testing for ships submarines underwater weapons and Army direct fire weapons. He is responsible for day-to-day OSD oversight of Navy ship vulnerability and is a member of the crew casualty working group of the Joint Technical Coordinating Group for Munitions Effectiveness. Previously he worked at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard the Marine Division of the Army Corps of Engineers the David Taylor Model Basin and the Office of Naval Intelligence and on the staff of the Navy's Ship Characteristics and Improvement Board. Mr. Bloom graduated from Virginia Polytechnic Institute with a BS in mechanical engineering (naval architecture and marine engineering). His graduate work was in oceanography and in engineering administration. He is a member of ASNE SNAME the International Test and Evaluation Association the U.S. Naval Institute and the Naval Submarine League and is listed inWho's Who in the East.He is a recent recipient of the Secretary of Defense Meritorious Civilian Service Medal. Dr. Ronald M. Reese:has headed the live fire test and evaluation sea systems team in the operational evaluation division of the Institute for Defense Analyses (IDA) for the past three years. From 1980–1990 he worked at NKF Engineering Inc. in various areas of ship survivability and ship design specializing in ship signature reduction. From 1960–1980 he served in the U.S. Navy as a surface line officer and in various capacities as an Engineering Duty Officer including Naval Ship Engineering Center Ship Design Manager for PHM and Continuing CV Conceptual Design NavSea PMS 378 Program Manager/SUPSHIP Newport News Project Officer forVirginia(CGN-38) class construction and Force Maintenance Officer Commander Naval Surface Force U.S. Atlantic Fleet. He retired from t

Live Fire Test and Evaluation (LFT&E) is a relatively recent addition to the requirements for ship acquisition programs. Ship LFT&E requires a combination of testing and analysis in order to evaluate the vulnerability of a new acquisition ship class to the threat weapons it is likely to encounter in combat. LFT&E supports the ship acquisition process by identifying vulnerability weaknesses early in a development program and enabling timely, well informed decisions regarding ship vulnerability reduction features. This paper discusses the various aspects of ship LFT&E and how they relate to make a positive impact on a ship acquisition program in a timely fashion. It describes a four-element approach to ship LFT&E consisting of (1) component, system, and full-scale ship tests, (2) surrogate tests, (3) damage scenario-based engineering analyses, and (4) a Total Ship Survivability Trial demonstrating the ability of the full-up ship to combat damage and ''fight hurt.''

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

NUCLEAR VS NONNUCLEAR ATTACK SUBMARINE POWERPLANTS

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1993年第3期105卷 224-231页

作者： RAINS, DA MITCHELL, KA Dr. Dean A. Rains:is president of Decision Engineering Pascagoula Miss. He has been an active member of ASNE since 1970 a frequent contributor to the Naval Engineers Journal and a participant at ASNE Day as an author and a discusser. He was either chairman or paper chairman for several Cruiser Destroyer and Frigate Technology Symposiums held in Biloxi Miss. He is past chairman of the Pascagoula Section of ASNE. He is currently the program chairman for the Pascagoula Section. He has forty-two years engineering experience and is a graduate of the California Institute of Technology from which he received his B.S. M.S. and Ph.D. all in mechanical engineering. Kenneth A. Mitchell Jr.:is an engineer with U.S. Marine New Orleans La. He was formerly an engineer at Decision Engineering Pascagoula Miss. and has three years of engineering experience. He is an active member of ASNE. Mr. Mitchell received his B.S. in naval architecture and marine engineering from the University of New Orleans.

The budget cuts of the 1990s have placed the Navy in a difficult position when trying to maintain neet levels capable of meeting a more dispersed and less defined threat. The cancellation of Seawolf initiated a large effort to define a suhmarine that is capable and affordable with today's shrinking budget. Manv European countries have turned to air independent (AIP), non-nuclear propulsion systems as a way of increasing the effectiveness of their fleets when compared to their current diesel/electric bouts. Bv evaluating and comparing two AIP and one hybrid propulsion systems to current nuclear capabilities, we can help define options for the next generation submarine. This paper attempts to provide design and cost information which can be used in conjunction with mission profiles to determine the best system for the desired job. Tomorrow's submarine will perform a variety of missions. Most all can be handled well bv nuclear submarines, but at what cost? These performance/cost tradeoffs are the subject of this paper.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

UNDERWATER INSPECTION FOR WELDING AND OVERHAUL

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1993年第5期105卷 37-42页

作者： MITTLEMAN, J SWAN, L John Mittleman:is a mechanical engineer at the Naval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren Division Coastal Systems Station in Panama City Florida. His Primary Responsibilities are in the development of underwater nondestructive testing equipment for use by fleet divers and inspectors. He also performs research in the characterization of metal microstructure through ultrasonic scattering measurements. Mr. Mittleman received his BS from Cornell University in 1969 and science master's in ocean engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1970. His research currently supports doctoral studies with Iowa State University. Mr. Mittleman received the American Society of Naval Engineer's Solberg Award in 1981 for his contributions to underwater ship hull inspection. Mr. Mittleman is a member of ASNE ASNT ASTM IoD Sigma Xi Tau Beta Pi and Phi Kappa Phi. Lisa Swan:is a mechanical engineer at the Naval Surface Warfare Center in Panama City Florida. She is involved in nondestructive testing engineering primarily in the underwater arena. Ms. Swan holds a bachelor of science in materials engineering from North Carolina State University. She is a graduate of the Federal Women's Executive Leadership Program. Ms. Swan is a member of ASNT.

Significant progress has been made in making underwater ultrasonic thickness gauging and magnetic particle inspections available to the fleet. Under sponsorship from the Naval Sea systems Command, Director of Ocean engineering, Underwater Ship Husbandry Division (NavSea 00C5), the Coastal systems Station has developed complete hardware packages supporting these two nondestructive test methods, and has introduced them to military inspectors at a shore intermediate maintenance activity, a destroyer tender, and a naval shipyard. Performance trials conducted prior to taking the systems to the field have been accepted by NavSea, Ships' Concepts Group, Materials Subgroup, Metals Division (NavSea 5142) as evidence that these inspections can reliably be performed underwater. Avenues for certifying specially trained divers and inspectors are being developed;for the first time the Navy will have all of the elements in place for underwater inspections satisfying the requirements of Mil-Std-271 (Requirements for Nondestructive Testing Methods) and the Naval Ships' Technical Manual Chapter 074. Underwater ultrasonic thickness gauging has also been slated for use in the fleet, as data from laboratory and field trials have consistently shown that reliable results can be obtained by a team comprising a certified topside inspector and a diver. In tests performed at the Ship Repair Facility (SRF), Yokosuka, underwater readings were compared to those taken in dry dock by SRF inspectors, and independently by contract inspectors. On the basis of approximately 800 locations, differences between the data sets were found to be randomly distributed, with a standard deviation on the order of 0.02''. This level of accuracy is largely sufficient to distinguish plate which will need replacement during overhaul, or plate which is thick enough to weld on.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

CIRCULAR OVERMODED WAVE-GUIDE FOR SHIPBOARD USE

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1993年第2期105卷 39-52页

作者： HUTING, WA WARREN, JW GARNER, PN KRILL, JA William A. Huting:received the B.S.E. degree in electrical engineering from Duke University in 1981 the M.S.E.E. degree from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1982 and the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering (electrophysics) from the University of Maryland in 1989. From September 1981 to December 1983 he was a graduate teaching assistant with Georgia Tech. Since January 1984 he has been with The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory where he has principally been involved with the development of circular overmoded waveguides and tapered waveguide transitions for use in naval radar systems. Dr. Huting is a member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Jeffery W. Warren:received a B.S. degree in 1982 and an M.S. degree in 1984 both in electrical engineering from the University of South Carolina. His thesis research evaluated electro-optical measurements of surface charging of insulators in low-frequency fields. He joined The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory in 1984. Mr. Warren's activities include development and testing of electro-optical systems and the development of high-power low-loss overmoded waveguides. Mr. Warren is a member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Paul N. Garner: Jr. received the B.S. degree in mathematics and the B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Maryland in 1973 and 1980 respectively and the M.B.A. degree from the Florida Institute of Technology in 1984. Since 1987 he has been involved with the Cooperative Engagement Capability Program as the lead mechanical engineer and since 1990 he has been with The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory where he is now a member of the Senior Professional Staff. Jerry A. Krill:received the B.S.E.E. and M.S.E.E. degrees from Michigan State University in 1973 and 1974 respectively and a Ph.D. in electrical engineering (electrophysics) from the University of Maryland in 1978. From 1973 to the present he has been with The Johns

Several future Navy combat systems under development require efficient delivery of high power microwave energy from remote transmitters to array antennas. To achieve this requirement, a family of microwave components has been developed and tested. Progress is described in the design and testing of an overmoded circular TE01 mode waveguide applicable to special shipboard needs. Because such a waveguide had originally been developed for low power millimeter band trunkline communications between cities, new theoretical, design, and fabrication techniques had to be developed to meet our specific performance requirements. Moreover, in order to fulfill the combat system requirements, the waveguide would have to withstand harsh military requirements. Over several years the obstacles to the application of overmoded technology to Navy combat systems have been systematically eliminated. The effort has resulted in the invention of several new components, the development and validation of a new computer aided design package, and the implementation of new microwave measurement techniques. The first application of an overmoded waveguide to a combat system element was recently achieved in the successful demonstration of the prototype Cooperative Engagement Capability, and steps toward a production military version of the waveguide have been initiated.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

WHY ENGINEERS DONT UNDERSTAND LOGISTICS

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1992年第5期104卷 57-63页

作者： LIGHT, SP The Authoris currently the director Logistics and Material Division Security Assistance Program Management Office (PMS 380) in the Surface Combatants Directorate (SEA 91) Naval Sea Systems Command. He received his BS degree in mechanical engineering from West Virginia Institute of Technology his MS degree in systems management from the University of Southern California and he is a graduate of the Defense Systems Management College. He is also certified as a member of the NavSea's Civilian Material Professional Career Program. Among his previous employments Mr. Light has held engineering and logistics management positions with the U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters in the Naval Engineering Division the Naval Ship Systems Command Engineering Interface Management Office and the Naval Ship Engineering Center where he served as manager of integrated logistics support for the FFG-7 Ship Design Project Office. He also served as the ILS manager for the CG-47 and DDG-51 ship programs during the design phases of these programs. Mr. Light was also the director of the Acquisition and Logistics Office for Surface Combatants (SEA 91) between 1984 to 1991. Mr. Light has twenty-eight years of experience in surface ship design acquisition maintenance and logistics.

The author describes his observations during twenty-eight years of naval ship design, acquisition and logistics support experience that engineers do not understand logistics or even consider logistics as part of their engineering responsibilities. This paper will explore the reasons why. The paper will also provide reasons why the engineer should understand logistics and why it should become a part of the engineer's responsibilities and lexicon. The paper presents the position that an engineer armed with a knowledge of logistics can do the best job in producing a good supportability design. Recommendations are provided to the naval engineering and logistics communities to increase the logistics knowledge of engineers. Also, the author advocates the development of design techniques to be used by the engineer to produce good supportability designs. The increased role of the engineer in applying supportability design techniques will be required in the future if we are to do more with the planned reductions in the acquisition workforce.

关键词： engineering

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

COMPARISON OF SHOCK TEST METHODS OF MIL-S-901 DERIVED FROM TESTS ON A CIRCUIT-BREAKER AND SWITCHBOARD

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1992年第3期104卷 178-190页

作者： BRADLEY, TL DAVES, TM MCCAMPBELL, SL YKEMA, JI Thomas L. Bradley Jr:. is director of program management of SPD Technologies research and development group in Philadelphia Pa. He has twenty years of experience on Navy shipboard electrical power protective systems and electrical switchgear. Mr. Bradley received a B.S. degree in electrical engineering from Villanova University. He is a member of ASNE SNAME and IEEE. Ted M. Daves:is president of Hi-Test Laboratories Inc. Mr. Daves has devoted his professional career to Navy shock survivability testing programs to support shock qualification research on hull mechanical electrical and combat systems for both surface ships and submarines. He has twenty years of experience in lightweight medium weight and heavyweight shock qualification programs and has conducted shock survivability inspections at the component and systems level on almost all types of machinery and equipment that require MIL-S-901 shock qualification. He received his B.S. degree in industrial technology from Western Carolina University in 1970 and is a member of ASNE IES Shock and Vibration Information Center and ADPA. Steven L. McCampbell P.E:. is the engineering supervisor and senior technical officer at Hi-Test Laboratories Inc. where he has worked in direct support of Navy shock and vibration testing programs since 1978. His work includes test program management testing machine design and solution of design problems encountered by machinery and equipment undergoing shock and vibration qualification. He is familiar with instrumentation systems and methods data reduction and data interpretation. He received his B.S. in civil engineering from the University of Virginia in 1985. John I. Ykema P.E:. is vice president and chief technical officer at SPD Technologies Philadelphia Pa. He has served in various capacities within SPD (formerly I-T-E) since 1955. He served for three years (1951–1954) with NavSea (formerly BuShips) engineering electrical power systems for aircraft carriers and cruisers. Mr. Ykema received his M.S. degree

For shipboard equipment to qualify as shock-hardened, it must pass a shock test in accordance with the military shock test specification, MIL-S-901 [1]. The test methods prescribed by MIL-S-901 have gone essentially unchanged since 1963. All equipment is divided into three test categories, depending on weight, and a different shock test machine is specified for each weight category. The heavy weight category is further sub-divided depending on the method of mounting within the ship, namely deck mounted or hull mounted. The authors have observed cases when equipment passing MIL-S-901 shock qualification testing using one method (e.g., the medium weight) failed when tested on another method (e.g., the floating shock platform). Concern about this difference in shock phenomena between the approved equipment performance stimulated the authors to perform the testing and analysis presented in this paper. The thirty year old test methods which have contributed significantly to shock survivability may not always simulate adequately the actual shipboard installation during shock qualification testing, thus leading to a false confidence level that all qualified equipment will perform well in combat. To explore the possible variations in shock phenomena from the different methods, an extensive testing program was conducted whereby a 100 ampere circuit breaker was subjected to shock testing under the four methods outlined in MIL-S-901D, namely, lightweight, medium weight, heavy weight deck, and heavy weight hull. The data gathered during the testing, and the performance of the equipment under test, were both evaluated and analyzed to observe differences in shock phenomena from each of the four different test methods. The shock testing methods, the equipment which was subjected to test, the test procedures, and the results of the investigation are described in this paper. The recommendations suggest improvements to the Navy shock testing methods and procedures.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

STRUCTURAL-ANALYSIS METHODS FOR LIGHTWEIGHT METALLIC CORRUGATED CORE SANDWICH PANELS SUBJECTED TO BLAST LOADS

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1991年第4期103卷 134-136页

作者： WIERNICKI, CJ LIEM, F WOODS, GD FURIO, A WHIDDON, WD SMITH, MA PACKARD, WT Christopher J. Wiernickiis the director of the Structures and Materials Division of Designers and Planners Inc. He has over 10 years of experience in marine structural design and advanced material product development. He received a B.S. degree in civil engineering from Vanderbilt University and M.S. degrees from both George Washington University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He is a registered professional engineer and is a member of ASNE SNAME and SAMPE. Franz Liemis a senior structural engineer of ASTECH. He has over 18 years of experience in structural engineering. He received M.S. degrees in civil/structural engineering from Carollo Wilhelmina University in West Germany. He is a registered professional engineer. Gregory D. Woodsis the Naval Sea Systems Command's lightweight metallic structures program manager. Until recently a naval architect in the Structural Integrity Application Division he currently works in the Amphibious Auxiliary and Support Ship Branch. He received a B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Tennessee State University with additional graduate level course work at the NavSea Institute. Anthony J. Furiois the program manager for lightweight metallic structures in the Ship Structure Division of the David Taylor Research Center. He has over 19 years of experience in ship structure research and light weight metallic development for U.S. Navy fleet applications. He received a B.S. in civil engineering from Long Island University and a M.S. in ocean engineering from Stevens Institute of Technology.

Since the early 1980s, the U.S. Navy, in conjunction with industry, has continued to develop and test innovative lightweight structural concepts with the purpose of seeking alternative replacements for conventional plate beam metallic structures. One commercially available concept currently under investigation is lightweight metallic corrugated core sandwich panels. This paper presents both elastic and plastic design methods for lightweight metallic corrugated core sandwich panels subjected to air blast loading. The equations presented in this paper, while not a complete solution to the complicated dynamic, elastic plastic phenomena of blast wave-rigid body interaction, are offered as a set of relatively simple analytical expressions that can be used in preliminary design. Because of the closed form nature of the equations the designer has the capability to quickly identify the most important parameters effecting the response of lightweight metallic corrugated core sandwich panels to air blast loads.

关键词： Shipbuilding Materials

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

AN AFFORDABLE APPROACH FOR QUALITY-ASSURED SHIPBOARD MAINTENANCE INFORMATION - REPLY

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1991年第4期103卷 155-155页

作者： KNACHEL, RE MAGROGAN, WF Robert E. Knachelreceived his B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Ohio State University in 1959 a B.S. in business administration from the University of Texas in 1963 and his M.B.A. degree from the Harvard Graduate School of Business in 1971. He served as a Navy line and Supply Corps officer for over twenty years. Prior to his retirement he served as the first U.S. Navy Supply Corps program manager for the Saudi Naval Expansion Program. Following retirement in 1981 he managed a series of U.S. Navy and foreign military sales logistics support programs for CACI Inc. Since 1988 he has been employed as a logistics program manager by Systems Engineering Associates (SEACOR) a division of Day and Zimmermann Inc. He currently serves as Washington area operations manager for SEACOR. Mr. Knachel is a member of ASNE and SOLE. William F. Magroganreceived his B.S. degree in economics from the University of Pennsylvania in 1964 an M.B.A. degree from Stanford University in 1972 and his master's degree in American studies from the California State University at Fullerton in 1987. He served on active duty as a U.S. Navy Supply Corps officer from 1964 to 1977 and continues to serve in the Naval Reserves where he has achieved the rank of captain. He has been employed as a financial/logistics analyst and program manager for EG&G Inc. Rockwell International and Unisys Corporation. Mr. Magrogan is currently associated with ELS Inc. as a principal analyst.

Acquisition and logistics professionals recognize the challenges in synchronizing maintenance and supply support information over the life cycle of shipboard systems and equipment. Decisions and judgments made during full-scale development, then described in maintenance documents and allowance lists, may become outdated for any number of reasons once the ship deploys. Thus, the fleet faces the possibility of out-of-sync maintenance support information at virtually any time. Initiatives during the 1980s which reconcile shipboard maintenance and support data include Integrated Logistics Overhauls (ILOs) and Ships Configuration and Logistics Support Information System (SCLSIS). These initiatives aim to ensure all shipboard equipments have current maintenance documents and up-to-date allowance lists, but they are expensive, time consuming, and scheduled every 4 to 5 years. Shipboard officers care about today's problem, particularly the next deployment. ILO and SCLSIS products are not always timed to the next deployment, nor is it practical or cost-effective to do so. Adopting the perspective of shipboard maintenance and supply officers, the authors identify three fundamental maintenance support information needs which quality assure readiness to perform a ship's mission: Technically complete, accurate, and up-to-date maintenance documents for all mission critical equipments. One-to-one correlation between authorized maintenance parts required and authorized allowance/ordering data for mission critical equipments. Assurances that all allowed mission critical parts needed for shipboard maintenance are on board or will be delivered prior to deployment. The authors maintain that the most affordable solution to shipboard maintenance support information quality assurance is to select mission critical equipments with significant CasRep or shipboard “trouble” histories and resolve any maintenance support information discrepancies prior to deployment “real-time.” This approach s

关键词： Ships

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：