检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

The Brain Tumor Sequence Registration (BraTS-Reg) Challenge: Establishing Correspondence Between Pre-Operative and Follow-up MRI Scans of Diffuse Glioma Patients

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

arXiv 2021年

作者： Baheti, Bhakti Chakrabarty, Satrajit Akbari, Hamed Bilello, Michel Wiestler, Benedikt Schwarting, Julian Calabrese, Evan Rudie, Jeffrey Abidi, Syed Mousa, Mina Villanueva-Meyer, Javier Fields, Brandon K.K. Kofler, Florian Shinohara, Russell Takeshi Iglesias, Juan Eugenio Mok, Tony C.W. Chung, Albert C.S. Wodzinski, Marek Jurgas, Artur Marini, Niccolò Atzori, Manfredo Müller, Henning Grosbröhmer, Christoph Siebert, Hanna Hansen, Lasse Heinrich, Mattias P. Canalini, Luca Klein, Jan Gerken, Annika Heldmann, Stefan Hering, Alessa Hahn, Horst K. Meng, Mingyuan Bi, Lei Feng, Dagan Kim, Jinman Zeineldinal, Ramy A. Karar, Mohamed E. Mathis-Ullrich, Franziska Burgert, Oliver Abderezaei, Javid Pionteck, Aymeric Chopra, Agamdeep Kurt, Mehmet Yan, Kewei Yan, Yonghong Tang, Zhe Ma, Jianqiang Nasser, Sahar Almahfouz Kurian, Nikhil Cherian Meena, Mohit Shamsi, Saqib Sethi, Amit Tustison, Nicholas J. Avants, Brian B. Cook, Philip Gee, James C. Tian, Lin Greer, Hastings Niethammer, Marc Hoopesar, Andrew Hoffmannas, Malte Dalcaar, Adrian V. Christodoulidis, Stergios Estiene, Théo Vakalopoulou, Maria Paragios, Nikos Marcus, Daniel S. Davatzikos, Christos Sotiras, Aristeidis Menze, Bjoern Bakas, Spyridon Waldmannstetter, Diana Division of Computational Pathology Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine IndianapolisIN United States Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering Washington University in St. Louis St. LouisMO United States GE HealthCare San RamonCA United States University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology Washington University School of Medicine St. LouisMO United States Institute for Informatics Data Science & Biostatistics Washington University School of Medicine St. LouisMO United States Department of Bioengineering Santa Clara University Santa ClaraCA United States Department of Quantitative Biomedicine University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland Department of Computer Science TUM School of Computation Information and Technology Technical University of Munich Munich Germany Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology School of Medicine Klinikum rechts der Isar Technical University of Munich Munich Germany Department of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital Regensburg Regensburg Germany University Hospital Regensburg Regensburg Germany Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging University of California San FranciscoCA United States Department of Radiology Duke University Medical Center DurhamNC United States Department of Radiology University of California San DiegoCA United States Helmholtz AI Helmholtz Munich Neuherberg Germany Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center Department of Biostatistics Epidemiology and Informatics University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia United States Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School United States Centre for Medical Imaging Computing University College London United Kingdom The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Hong Kong University of Applied Sciences West

Registration of longitudinal brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans containing pathologies is challenging due to dramatic changes in tissue appearance. Although there has been considerable progress in developing general-purpose medical image registration techniques, they have not yet attained the requisite precision and reliability for this task, highlighting its inherent complexity. Here we describe the Brain Tumor Sequence Registration (BraTS-Reg) challenge, as the first public benchmark environment for deformable registration algorithms focusing on estimating correspondences between pre-operative and follow-up scans of the same patient diagnosed with a diffuse brain glioma. The challenge was conducted in conjunction with both the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2022 and the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2022. The BraTS-Reg data comprise de-identified multi-institutional multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) scans, curated for size and resolution according to a canonical anatomical template, and divided into training, validation, and testing sets. Clinical experts annotated ground truth (GT) landmark points of anatomical locations distinct across the temporal domain. The training data with their GT annotations, were publicly released to enable the development of registration algorithms. The validation data, without their GT annotations, were also released to allow for algorithmic evaluation prior to the testing phase, which only allowed submission of containerized algorithms for evaluation on hidden hold-out testing data. Quantitative evaluation and ranking was based on the Median Euclidean Error (MEE), Robustness, and the determinant of the Jacobian of the displacement field. The top-ranked methodologies yielded similar performance across all evaluation metrics and shared several methodological commonalities, including pre-alignment, deep neural networks, inverse consistency

关键词： Magnetic resonance imaging

Biomedical image analysis competitions: The state of current participation practice

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

arXiv 2022年

作者： Eisenmann, Matthias Reinke, Annika Weru, Vivienn Tizabi, Minu Dietlinde Isensee, Fabian Adler, Tim J. Godau, Patrick Cheplygina, Veronika Kozubek, Michal Maier-Hein, Klaus Jäger, Paul F. Kopp-Schneider, Annette Maier-Hein, Lena Ali, Sharib Gupta, Anubha Kybic, Jan Noble, Alison de Solórzano, Carlos Ortiz Pachade, Samiksha Petitjean, Caroline Sage, Daniel Wei, Donglai Wilden, Elizabeth Alapatt, Deepak Andrearczyk, Vincent Baid, Ujjwal Bakas, Spyridon Balu, Niranjan Bano, Sophia Bawa, Vivek Singh Bernal, Jorge Bodenstedt, Sebastian Casella, Alessandro Choi, Jinwook Commowick, Olivier Daum, Marie Depeursinge, Adrien Dorent, Reuben Egger, Jan Eichhorn, Hannah Engelhardt, Sandy Ganz, Melanie Girard, Gabriel Hansen, Lasse Heinrich, Mattias Heller, Nicholas Hering, Alessa Huaulmé, Arnaud Kim, Hyunjeong Li, Hongwei Bran Landman, Bennett Li, Jianning Ma, Jun Martel, Anne Martín-Isla, Carlos Menze, Bjoern Nwoye, Chinedu Innocent Oreiller, Valentin Padoy, Nicolas Pati, Sarthak Payette, Kelly Sudre, Carole van Wijnen, Kimberlin Vardazaryan, Armine Vercauteren, Tom Wagner, Martin Wang, Chuanbo Yap, Moi Hoon Yu, Zeyun Yuan, Chun Zenk, Maximilian Zia, Aneeq Zimmerer, David Bao, Rina Choi, Chanyeol Cohen, Andrew Dzyubachyk, Oleh Galdran, Adrian Gan, Tianyuan Guo, Tianqi Gupta, Pradyumna Haithami, Mahmood Ho, Edward Jang, Ikbeom Li, Zhili Luo, Zhengbo Lux, Filip Makrogiannis, Sokratis Müller, Dominik Oh, Young-Tack Pang, Subeen Pape, Constantin Polat, Gorkem Reed, Charlotte Rosalie Ryu, Kanghyun Scherr, Tim Thambawita, Vajira Wang, Haoyu Wang, Xinliang Xu, Kele Yeh, Hung Yeo, Doyeob Yuan, Yixuan Zeng, Yan Zhao, Xin Abbing, Julian Adam, Jannes Adluru, Nagesh Agethen, Niklas Ahmed, Salman Al Khalil, Yasmina Alenyà, Mireia Alhoniemi, Esa An, Chengyang Arega, Tewodros Weldebirhan Avisdris, Netanell Aydogan, Dogu Baran Bai, Yingbin Calisto, Maria Baldeon Basaran, Berke Doga Beetz, Marcel Bian, Hao Blansit, Kevin Bloch, Louise Bohnsack, Robert Bosticardo, Sara Breen, Jack Brudfors, Mikael Brüngel, Raphael Cabezas, Mariano Cacciola, Alb Heidelberg Division of Intelligent Medical Systems Germany Heidelberg HI Helmholtz Imaging Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Heidelberg Division of Biostatistics Germany Heidelberg Division of Medical Image Computing Germany Heidelberg HI Applied Vision Lab Germany IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic Heidelberg Interactive Machine Learning Group Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science and Medical Faculty Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany NCT Heidelberg DKFZ University Hospital Heidelberg Germany School of Computing University of Leeds Leeds United Kingdom SBILab Department of ECE IIIT-Delhi India Faculty of Electrical Engineering Czech Technical University Prague Czech Republic Institute of Biomedical Engineering University of Oxford United Kingdom Center for Applied Medical Research Pamplona Spain Shri Guru Gobind Singhji Institute of Engineering and Technology Maharashtra Nanded India Université de Rouen Normandie France Lausanne Switzerland School of Engineering and Applied Science Harvard University United States ICube University of Strasbourg CNRS France Institute of Informatics School of Management HES-SO Valais-Wallis University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland Techno-Pôle 3 Sierre3960 Switzerland Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Lausanne University Hospital Rue du Bugnon 46 LausanneCH-1011 Switzerland University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology University of Washington United States Wellcome EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences University College London London United Kingdom Visual Artificial Intelligence Lab Oxford Brookes University Oxford United Kingdom Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona & Computer Vision Center Spain Dresden Fetscherstraße 74 PF 64 Dresden01307 Germany

The number of international benchmarking competitions is steadily increasing in various fields of machine learning (ML) research and practice. So far, however, little is known about the common practice as well as bottlenecks faced by the community in tackling the research questions posed. To shed light on the status quo of algorithm development in the specific field of biomedical imaging analysis, we designed an international survey that was issued to all participants of challenges conducted in conjunction with the IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021 conferences (80 competitions in total). The survey covered participants' expertise and working environments, their chosen strategies, as well as algorithm characteristics. A median of 72% challenge participants took part in the survey. According to our results, knowledge exchange was the primary incentive (70%) for participation, while the reception of prize money played only a minor role (16%). While a median of 80 working hours was spent on method development, a large portion of participants stated that they did not have enough time for method development (32%). 25% perceived the infrastructure to be a bottleneck. Overall, 94% of all solutions were deep learning-based. Of these, 84% were based on standard architectures. 43% of the respondents reported that the data samples (e.g., images) were too large to be processed at once. This was most commonly addressed by patch-based training (69%), downsampling (37%), and solving 3D analysis tasks as a series of 2D tasks. K-fold cross-validation on the training set was performed by only 37% of the participants and only 50% of the participants performed ensembling based on multiple identical models (61%) or heterogeneous models (39%). 48% of the respondents applied postprocessing steps. © 2022, CC BY.

关键词： Benchmarking

A survey on dragonfly algorithm and its applications in engineering

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

arXiv 2020年

作者： Rahman, Chnoor M. Rashid, Tarik A. Alsadoon, Abeer Bacanin, Nebojsa Fattah, Polla Mirjalili, Seyedali Applied Computer Department College of Health and Applied Sciences Charmo University Sulaimany Iraq Science and Engineering Department University of Kurdistan Hewler Erbil Iraq School of Computing and Mathematics Charles Sturt University Sydney Australia School of Computing Engineering and Mathematics Western Sydney University Sydney City Campus Australia Information Technology Department Sydney Australia Kent Institute Australia Information Technology Department Sydney Australia Singidunum University Belgrade Serbia Software and Informatics Engineering Salahaddin University-Erbil Erbil Iraq Centre for Artificial Intelligence Research and Optimisation Torrens University Australia Yonsei Frontier Lab Yonsei University Seoul Korea Republic of

The dragonfly algorithm was developed in 2016. It is one of the algorithms used by researchers to optimize an extensive series of uses and applications in various areas. At times, it offers superior performance compared to the most well-known optimization techniques. However, this algorithm faces several difficulties when it is utilized to enhance complex optimization problems. This work addressed the robustness of the method to solve real-world optimization issues, and its deficiency to improve complex optimization problems. This review paper shows a comprehensive investigation of the dragonfly algorithm in the engineering area. First, an overview of the algorithm is discussed. Besides, we also examined the modifications of the algorithm. The merged forms of this algorithm with different techniques and the modifications that have been done to make the algorithm perform better are addressed. Additionally, a survey on applications in the engineering area that used the dragonfly algorithm is offered. The utilized engineering applications are the applications in the field of mechanical engineering problems, electrical engineering problems, optimal parameters, economic load dispatch, and loss reduction. The algorithm is tested and evaluated against particle swarm optimization algorithm and firefly algorithm. To evaluate the ability of the dragonfly algorithm and other participated algorithms a set of traditional benchmarks (TF1-TF23) were utilized. Moreover, to examine the ability of the algorithm to optimize large-scale optimization problems CEC-C2019 benchmarks were utilized. A comparison is made between the algorithm and other metaheuristic techniques to show its ability to enhance various problems. The outcomes of the algorithm from the works that utilized the dragonfly algorithm previously and the outcomes of the benchmark test functions proved that in comparison with participated algorithms (GWO, PSO, and GA), the dragonfly algorithm owns an excellent performance,

关键词： Multiobjective optimization

Learning from learning machines: A new generation of AI technology to meet the needs of science

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

arXiv 2021年

作者： Pion-Tonachini, Luca Bouchard, Kristofer Martin, Hector Garcia Peisert, Sean Holtz, W. Bradley Aswani, Anil Dwivedi, Dipankar Wainwright, Haruko Pilania, Ghanshyam Nachman, Benjamin Marrone, Babetta L. Falco, Nicola Prabhat Arnold, Daniel Wolf-Yadlin, Alejandro Powers, Sarah Climer, Sharlee Jackson, Quinn Carlson, Ty Sohn, Michael Zwart, Petrus Kumar, Neeraj Justice, Amy Tomlin, Claire Jacobson, Daniel Micklem, Gos Gkoutos, Georgios V. Bickel, Peter J. Cazier, Jean-Baptiste Müller, Juliane Webb-Robertson, Bobbie-Jo Stevens, Rick Anderson, Mark Kreutz-Delgado, Ken Mahoney, Michael W. Brown, James B. Pattern Computer Inc. Friday HarborWA98250 United States Biosciences Area Lawrence Berkeley National Lab BerkeleyCA94803 United States Computational Research Division Lawrence Berkeley National Lab BerkeleyCA94720 United States Helen Wils Neuroscience Institute Redwood Center for Theoretical Neuroscience Uc Berkeley BerkeleyCA94720 United States Doe Agile BioFoundry Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory BerkeleyCA94803 United States Joint BioEnergy Institute Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory BerkeleyCA94803 United States Bcam Basque Center for Applied Mathematics Bilbao48009 Spain Computer Science University of California Davis DavisCA95616 United States Cenic La MiradaCA90638 United States Health Informatics University of California Davis School of Medicine SacramentoCA95817 United States Berkeley Institute for Data Science University of California Berkeley BerkeleyCA94720 United States Industrial Engineering and Operations Research University of California Berkeley BerkeleyCA94720 United States Environmental & Earth Sciences Area Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory BerkeleyCA94803 United States Nuclear Engineering University of California Berkeley BerkeleyCA94720 United States Materials Science and Technology Division Los Alamos National Laboratory Los AlamosNM87545 United States Physics Division Lawrence Berkeley National Lab BerkeleyCA94720 United States Bioscience Division Los Alamos National Laboratory Los AlamosNM87545 United States Earth and Environmental Sciences Area Lawrence Berkeley National Lab BerkeleyCA94803 United States Energy Technologies Area Lawrence Berkeley National Lab BerkeleyCA94803 United States Computing and Computational Sciences Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak RidgeTN37831 United States Industrial & Systems Engineering The University of Tennessee KnoxvilleTN37996 United States Department of Computer Science University of Missouri-Saint Louis St. LouisMO63121 United

We outline emerging opportunities and challenges to enhance the utility of AI for scientific discovery. The distinct goals of AI for industry versus the goals of AI for science create tension between identifying patterns in data versus discovering patterns in the world from data. If we address the fundamental challenges associated with "bridging the gap" between domain-driven scientific models and data-driven AI learning machines, then we expect that these AI models can transform hypothesis generation, scientific discovery, and the scientific process itself. © 2021, CC BY.

关键词： Learning systems

Identification and development of therapeutics for COVID-19

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

arXiv 2021年

作者： Rando, Halie M. Wellhausen, Nils Ghosh, Soumita Lee, Alexandra J. Dattoli, Anna Ada Hu, Fengling Byrd, James Brian Rafizadeh, Diane N. Lordan, Ronan Qi, Yanjun Sun, Yuchen Brueffer, Christian Field, Jeffrey M. Guebila, Marouen Ben Jadavji, Nafisa M. Skelly, Ashwin N. Ramsundar, Bharath Wang, Jinhui Goel, Rishi Raj Park, YoSon Boca, Simina M. Gitter, Anthony Greene, Casey S. Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics University of Colorado School of Medicine AuroraCO United States Center for Health AI University of Colorado School of Medicine AuroraCO United States Institute of Translational Medicine and Therapeutics Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Biostatistics Epidemiology and Informatics University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States University of Michigan School of Medicine Ann ArborMI United States Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Chemistry University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Computer Science University of Virginia CharlottesvilleVA United States Department of Clinical Sciences Lund University Lund Sweden Department of Biostatistics Harvard School of Public Health BostonMA United States Biomedical Science Midwestern University GlendaleAZ United States Department of Neuroscience Carleton University OttawaON Canada Institute for Immunology University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine Philadelphia United States The DeepChem Project Institute for Immunology University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States SiminaB Innovation Center for BiomedicalInformatics Georgetown University Medical Center WashingtonDC United States Early Biometrics & Statistical Innovation Data Science & Artificial Intelligence R & D AstraZeneca GaithersburgMD United States Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics University of Wisconsin-Madison MadisonWI United States Morgridge Institute for Research MadisonWI United States Childhood Cancer Data Lab Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation PhiladelphiaPA United States

After emerging in China in late 2019, the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 spread worldwide and as of mid-2021 remains a significant threat globally. Only a few coronaviruses are known to infect humans, and only two cause infections similar in severity to SARS-CoV-2: Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus, a closely related species of SARS-CoV-2 that emerged in 2002, and Middle East respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus, which emerged in 2012. Unlike the current pandemic, previous epidemics were controlled rapidly through public health measures, but the body of research investigating severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome has proven valuable for identifying approaches to treating and preventing novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Building on this research, the medical and scientific communities have responded rapidly to the COVID-19 crisis to identify many candidate therapeutics. The approaches used to identify candidates fall into four main categories: adaptation of clinical approaches to diseases with related pathologies, adaptation based on virological properties, adaptation based on host response, and data-driven identification of candidates based on physical properties or on pharmacological compendia. To date, a small number of therapeutics have already been authorized by regulatory agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), while most remain under investigation. The scale of the COVID-19 crisis offers a rare opportunity to collect data on the effects of candidate therapeutics. This information provides insight not only into the management of coronavirus diseases, but also into the relative success of different approaches to identifying candidate therapeutics against an emerging disease. © 2021, CC BY.

关键词： Coronavirus

Learn2Reg: comprehensive multi-task medical image registration challenge, dataset and evaluation in the era of deep learning

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

arXiv 2021年

作者： Hering, Alessa Hansen, Lasse Mok, Tony C.W. Chung, Albert C.S. Siebert, Hanna Häger, Stephanie Lange, Annkristin Kuckertz, Sven Heldmann, Stefan Shao, Wei Vesal, Sulaiman Rusu, Mirabela Sonn, Geoffrey Estienne, Théo Vakalopoulou, Maria Han, Luyi Huang, Yunzhi Yap, Pew-Thian Brudfors, Mikael Balbastre, Yaël Joutard, Samuel Modat, Marc Lifshitz, Gal Raviv, Dan Lv, Jinxin Li, Qiang Jaouen, Vincent Visvikis, Dimitris Fourcade, Constance Rubeaux, Mathieu Pan, Wentao Xu, Zhe Jian, Bailiang De Benetti, Francesca Wodzinski, Marek Gunnarsson, Niklas Sjölund, Jens Grzech, Daniel Qiu, Huaqi Li, Zeju Thorley, Alexander Duan, Jinming Großbröhmer, Christoph Hoopes, Andrew Reinertsen, Ingerid Xiao, Yiming Landman, Bennett Huo, Yuankai Murphy, Keelin Lessmann, Nikolas van Ginneken, Bram Dalca, Adrian V. Heinrich, Mattias P. Institute of Medical Informatics Universität zu Lübeck Ratzeburger Allee 160 Lübeck23562 Germany Fraunhofer MEVIS Institute for Digital Medicine Lübeck23562 Germany Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Radboud University Medical Center GA Nijmegen6525 Netherlands The Institute of Medical Informatics Universität zu Lübeck Lübeck23562 Germany The Department of Computer Science and Engineering The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Hong Kong The Fraunhofer MEVIS Institute for Digital Medicine Lübeck23562 Germany The Department of Radiology Stanford University StanfordCA94305 United States The Department of Urology Stanford University StanfordCA94305 United States The Université Paris-Saclay CentraleSupélec Mathématiques et Informatique pour la Complexité et les Systèmes Inria Saclay Gif-sur-Yvette 91190 France Université Paris-Saclay Institut Gustave Roussy Inserm Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique Villejuif94800 France The Université Paris-Saclay CentraleSupélec Mathématiques et Informatique pour la Complexité et les Systèmes Inria Saclay Gif-sur-Yvette91190 France The Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen6525 GA Netherlands The School of Automation Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology Nanjing210044 China The School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences King’s College London London United Kingdom The Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging Massachusetts General Hospital United States Harvard Medical School Boston United States The King’s College London United Kingdom The Tel Aviv University The Britton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics-Huazhong University of Science and Technology Hubei Wuhan430074 China MoE Key Laboratory for Biomedical Photonics Collaborative Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering School of Engineering Sciences Huazhong University of Sci

Image registration is a fundamental medical image analysis task, and a wide variety of approaches have been proposed. However, only a few studies have comprehensively compared medical image registration approaches on a wide range of clinically relevant tasks. This limits the development of registration methods, the adoption of research advances into practice, and a fair benchmark across competing approaches. The Learn2Reg challenge addresses these limitations by providing a multi-task medical image registration data set for comprehensive characterisation of deformable registration algorithms. A continuous evaluation will be possible at https://***. Learn2Reg covers a wide range of anatomies (brain, abdomen, and thorax), modalities (ultrasound, CT, MR), availability of annotations, as well as intra- and inter-patient registration evaluation. We established an easily accessible framework for training and validation of 3D registration methods, which enabled the compilation of results of over 65 individual method submissions from more than 20 unique teams. We used a complementary set of metrics, including robustness, accuracy, plausibility, and runtime, enabling unique insight into the current state-of-the-art of medical image registration. This paper describes datasets, tasks, evaluation methods and results of the challenge, as well as results of further analysis of transferability to new datasets, the importance of label supervision, and resulting bias. While no single approach worked best across all tasks, many methodological aspects could be identified that push the performance of medical image registration to new state-of-the-art performance. Furthermore, we demystified the common belief that conventional registration methods have to be much slower than deep-learning-based methods. © 2021, CC BY.

关键词： Image registration

Depression and self-harm risk assessment in online forums

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Depression and self-harm risk assessment in online forums

2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2017

作者： Yates, Andrew Cohan, Arman Goharian, Nazli Max Planck Institute for Informatics Saarland Informatics Campus Saarbruecken Germany Information Retrieval Lab Department of Computer Science Georgetown University WashingtonDC United States

ISBN: (纸本)9781945626838

Users suffering from mental health conditions often turn to online resources for support, including specialized online support communities or general communities such as Twitter and Reddit. In this work, we present a framework for supporting and studying users in both types of communities. We propose methods for identifying posts in support communities that may indicate a risk of self-harm, and demonstrate that our approach outperforms strong previously proposed methods for identifying such posts. Self-harm is closely related to depression, which makes identifying depressed users on general forums a crucial related task. We introduce a large-scale general forum dataset consisting of users with self-reported depression diagnoses matched with control users. We show how our method can be applied to effectively identify depressed users from their use of language alone. We demonstrate that our method outperforms strong baselines on this general forum dataset. © 2017 Association for Computational Linguistics.

关键词： Risk assessment

Forecasting intracranial hypertension using multi-scale waveform metrics

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

arXiv 2019年

作者： Hüser, Matthias Kündig, Adrian Karlen, Walter De Luca, Valeria Jaggi, Martin Biomedical Informatics Group Department of Computer Science ETH Zürich Universitätstrasse 6 Zürich8092 Switzerland Mobile Health Systems Lab Institute of Robotics and Intelligent Systems Department of Health Sciences and Technology ETH Zürich Zürich8008 Switzerland Department of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering ETH Zürich Zürich8092 Switzerland Machine Learning & Optimization Lab EPFL Lausanne1015 Switzerland

Objective: Acute intracranial hypertension is an important risk factor of secondary brain damage after traumatic brain injury. Hypertensive episodes are often diagnosed reactively, leading to late detection and lost time for intervention planning. A pro-active approach that predicts critical events several hours ahead of time could assist in directing attention to patients at risk. Approach: We developed a prediction framework that forecasts onsets of acute intracranial hypertension in the next 8 hours. It jointly uses cerebral auto-regulation indices, spectral energies and morphological pulse metrics to describe the neurological state of the patient. One-minute base windows were compressed by computing signal metrics, and then stored in a multi-scale history, from which physiological features were derived. Main results: Our model predicted events up to 8 hours in advance with alarm recall rates of 90% at a precision of 30.3% in the MIMIC-III waveform database, improving upon two baselines from the literature. We found that features derived from high-frequency waveforms substantially improved the prediction performance over simple statistical summaries of low-frequency time serie1s, and each of the three feature classes contributed to the performance gain. The inclusion of long-term history up to 8 hours was especially important. Significance: Our results highlight the importance of information contained in high-frequency waveforms in the neurological intensive care unit. They could motivate future studies on pre-hypertensive patterns and the design of new alarm algorithms for critical events in the injured brain. Copyright © 2019, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Morphology

Neuropsychiatric Disease Classification Using Functional Connectomics - Results of the Connectomics in NeuroImaging Transfer Learning Challenge

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

arXiv 2020年

作者： Schirmer, Markus D. Venkataraman, Archana Rekik, Islem Kim, Minjeong Mostofsky, Stewart Beth Nebel, Mary Rosch, Keri Seymour, Karen Crocetti, Deana Irzan, Hassna Hütel, Michael Ourselin, Sebastien Marlow, Neil Melbourne, Andrew Levchenko, Egor Zhou, Shuo Kunda, Mwiza Lu, Haiping Dvornek, Nicha C. Zhuang, Juntang Pinto, Gideon Samal, Sandip Bernal-Rusiel, Jorge L. Pienaar, Rudolph Chung, Ai Wern Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston United States German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases Bonn Germany Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Johns Hopkins University Baltimore United States BASIRA lab Faculty of Computer and Informatics Istanbul Technical University Istanbul Turkey School of Science and Engineering Computing University of Dundee United Kingdom Department of Computer Science University of North Carolina at Greensboro United States Center for Neurodevelopmental and Imaging Research Kennedy Krieger Institute Baltimore United States Department of Neurology Johns Hopkins School of Medicine United States Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Baltimore United States Department of Neuropsychology Kennedy Krieger Institute Baltimore United States Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering University College London United Kingdom School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences Kings College London United Kingdom Institute for Womens Health University College London United Kingdom Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience Higher School of Economics Moscow Russia Department of Computer Science University of Sheffield SheffieldS1 4DP United Kingdom Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging Yale University New HavenCT United States Department of Biomedical Engineering Yale University New HavenCT United States Teradyte LLC Coral GablesFL United States Fetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging and Developmental Science Center Division of Newborn Medicine Boston Children’s Hospital Harvard Medical School BostonMA United States

Large, open-source datasets, such as the Human Connectome Project and the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange, have spurred the development of new and increasingly powerful machine learning approaches for brain connectomics. However, one key question remains: are we capturing biologically relevant and generalizable information about the brain, or are we simply overfitting to the data? To answer this, we organized a scientific challenge, the Connectomics in NeuroImaging Transfer Learning Challenge (CNI-TLC), held in conjunction with MICCAI 2019. CNI-TLC included two classification tasks: (1) diagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) within a pre-adolescent cohort;and (2) transference of the ADHD model to a related cohort of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) patients with an ADHD comorbidity. In total, 240 resting-state fMRI (rsfMRI) time series averaged according to three standard parcellation atlases, along with clinical diagnosis, were released for training and validation (120 neurotypical controls and 120 ADHD). We also provided Challenge participants with demographic information of age, sex, IQ, and handedness. The second set of 100 subjects (50 neurotypical controls, 25 ADHD, and 25 ASD with ADHD comorbidity) was used for testing. Classification methodologies were submitted in a standardized format as containerized Docker images through ChRIS, an open-source image analysis platform. Utilizing an inclusive approach, we ranked the methods based on 16 metrics: accuracy, area under the curve, F1-score, false discovery rate, false negative rate, false omission rate, false positive rate, geometric mean, informedness, markedness, Matthews correlation coefficient, negative predictive value, optimized precision, precision, sensitivity, and specificity. The final rank was calculated using the rank product for each participant across all measures. Furthermore, we assessed the calibration curves of each methodology. Five participants submitted their method fo

关键词： Diseases