检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

arXiv 2023年

作者： Callahan, Tiffany J. Tripodi, Ignacio J. Stefanski, Adrianne L. Cappelletti, Luca Taneja, Sanya B. Wyrwa, Jordan M. Casiraghi, Elena Matentzoglu, Nicolas A. Reese, Justin Silverstein, Jonathan C. Hoyt, Charles Tapley Boyce, Richard D. Malec, Scott A. Unni, Deepak R. Joachimiak, Marcin P. Robinson, Peter N. Mungall, Christopher J. Cavalleri, Emanuele Fontana, Tommaso Valentini, Giorgio Mesiti, Marco Gillenwater, Lucas A. Santangelo, Brook Vasilevsky, Nicole A. Hoehndorf, Robert Bennett, Tellen D. Ryan, Patrick B. Hripcsak, George Kahn, Michael G. Bada, Michael Baumgartner, William A. Hunter, Lawrence E. Computational Bioscience Program University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus AuroraCO80045 United States Department of Biomedical Informatics Columbia University Irving Medical Center New YorkNY10032 United States Computer Science Department Interdisciplinary Quantitative Biology University of Colorado Boulder BoulderCO80301 United States AnacletoLab Computer Science Department University of Milan 20122 Italy Intelligent Systems Program University of Pittsburgh PittsburghPA15260 United States Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation School of Medicine University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus AuroraCO80045 United States Division of Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory BerkeleyCA94720 United States Semanticly Ltd Athens Greece Department of Biomedical Informatics University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine PittsburghPA15206 United States Laboratory of Systems Pharmacology Harvard Medical School BostonMA02115 United States Division of Translational Informatics University of New Mexico School of Medicine AlbuquerqueNM87131 United States SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics Basel Switzerland Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitatsmedizin Berlin10117 Germany ELLIS European Laboratory for Learning and Intelligent Systems Germany Department of Biomedical Informatics University of Colorado School of Medicine AuroraCO80045 United States Data Collaboration Center Critical Path Institute 1840 E River Rd. Suite 100 TucsonAZ85718 United States Computer Electrical and Mathematical Sciences & Engineering Division Computational Bioscience Research Center King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Thuwal23955-6900 Saudi Arabia Department of Pediatrics University of Colorado School of Medicine AuroraCO80045 United States Janssen Research and Development RaritanNJ08869 United States Division of General Internal Medicine University of Colorado School of Medicine A

Translational research requires data at multiple scales of biological organization. Advancements in sequencing and multi-omics technologies have increased the availability of these data, but researchers face significant integration challenges. Knowledge graphs (KGs) are used to model complex phenomena, and methods exist to construct them automatically. However, tackling complex biomedical integration problems requires flexibility in the way knowledge is modeled. Moreover, existing KG construction methods provide robust tooling at the cost of fixed or limited choices among knowledge representation models. PheKnowLator (Phenotype Knowledge Translator) is a semantic ecosystem for automating the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) construction of ontologically grounded KGs with fully customizable knowledge representation. The ecosystem includes KG construction resources (e.g., data preparation APIs), analysis tools (e.g., SPARQL endpoints and abstraction algorithms), and benchmarks (e.g., prebuilt KGs and embeddings). We evaluated the ecosystem by systematically comparing it to existing open-source KG construction methods and by analyzing its computational performance when used to construct 12 large-scale KGs. With flexible knowledge representation, PheKnowLator enables fully customizable KGs without compromising performance or usability. © 2023, CC BY.

关键词： Ecosystems

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

NTIRE 2022 Challenge on Stereo Image Super-Resolution: Methods and Results

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2022年

作者： Guo, Yulan Wang, Longguang Wang, Yingqian Li, Juncheng Gu, Shuhang Timofte, Radu Chen, Liangyu Chu, Xiaojie Yu, Wenqing Jin, Kai Wei, Zeqiang Guo, Sha Yang, Angulia Zhou, Xiuzhuang Guo, Guodong Xiao, Huaxin Yan, Shen Liu, Yuxiang Cai, Hanxiao Dai, Bin Peng, Feiyue Cao, Pu Nie, Yang Yang, Lu Song, Qing Hu, Xiaotao Xu, Jun Xu, Mai Jing, Junpeng Deng, Xin Xing, Qunliang Qiao, Minglang Guan, Zhenyu Guo, Wenlong Peng, Chenxu Chen, Zan Chen, Junyang Li, Hao Chen, Junbin Li, Weijie Yang, Zhijing Li, Gen Li, Aijin Sun, Lei Zhang, Dafeng Liu, Shizhuo Zhang, Jiangtao Qu, Yanyun Yang, Hao-Hsiang Huang, Zhi-Kai Chen, Wei-Ting Chang, Hua-En Kuo, Sy-Yen Liang, Qiaohui Lin, Jianxin Wang, Yijun Yin, Lianying Zhang, Rongju Zhao, Wei Xiao, Peng Xu, Rongjian Zhang, Zhilu Zuo, Wangmeng Guo, Hansheng Gao, Guangwei Zeng, Tieyong Kim, Joohyeok Kim, HyeonA Park, Eunpil Sim, Jae-Young Pi, Huicheng Zhang, Shunli Zhai, Jucai Zeng, Pengcheng Liu, Yang Ma, Chihao Huang, Yulin Chen, Junying National University of Defense Technology China The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong The University of Sydney Australia University of Würzburg ETH Zürich Switzerland MEGVII Technology China Peking University China Bigo Technology Pte. Ltd Singapore Smart Healthcare Innovation Lab Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications China School of Artificial Intelligence Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications China Head of Institute of Deep Learning Baidu Research College of Systems Engineering National University of Defense Technology China College of Liberal Arts and Sciences National University of Defense Technology China Pattern Recognition and Intelligent Vision Lab Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications China College of Computer Science Nankai University Tianjin China School of Statistics and Data Science Nankai University Tianjin Singapore Beihang University China Zhejiang University of Technology China Guangdong University of Technology China Tencent OVBU SRC-B Xiamen University China Department of Electrical Engineering National Taiwan University Taiwan Graduate Institute of Electronics Engineering National Taiwan University Taiwan College of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering Hunan University China Harbin Institude of Technology China The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications China Department of Electrical Engineering Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology Korea Republic of Graduate School of Artificial Intelligence Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology Korea Republic of Beijing Jiaotong University China City University of Hong Kong Hong Kong South China University of Technology China

In this paper, we summarize the 1st NTIRE challenge on stereo image super-resolution (restoration of rich details in a pair of low-resolution stereo images) with a focus on new solutions and results. This challenge has 1 track aiming at the stereo image super-resolution problem under a standard bicubic degradation. In total, 238 participants were successfully registered, and 21 teams competed in the final testing phase. Among those participants, 20 teams successfully submitted results with PSNR (RGB) scores better than the baseline. This challenge establishes a new benchmark for stereo image SR. Copyright © 2022, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Stereo image processing

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

MammoFL: Mammographic Breast Density Estimation using Federated learning

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2022年

作者： Muthukrishnan, Ramya Heyler, Angelina Katti, Keshava Pati, Sarthak Mankowski, Walter Alahari, Aprupa Sanborn, Michael Conant, Emily F. Scott, Christopher Winham, Stacey Vachon, Celine Chaudhari, Pratik Kontos, Despina Bakas, Spyridon Department of Computer and Information Science University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Massachusetts Institute of Technology CambridgeMA United States Research and Development GSK CambridgeMA United States Division of Computational Pathology Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine Indiana IN United States Research Center for Federated Learning in Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine Indiana IN United States University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Health Sciences Research Mayo Clinic RochesterMN United States

In this study, we automate quantitative mammographic breast density estimation with neural networks and show that this tool is a strong use case for federated learning on multi-institutional datasets. Our dataset included bilateral CC-view and MLO-view mammographic images from two separate institutions. Two U-Nets were separately trained on algorithm-generated labels to perform segmentation of the breast and dense tissue from these images and subsequently calculate breast percent density (PD). The networks were trained with federated learning and compared to three non-federated baselines, one trained on each single-institution dataset and one trained on the aggregated multi-institution dataset. We demonstrate that training on multi-institution datasets is critical to algorithm generalizability. We further show that federated learning on multi-institutional datasets improves model generalization to unseen data at nearly the same level as centralized training on multi-institutional datasets, indicating that federated learning can be applied to our method to improve algorithm generalizability while maintaining patient privacy. Copyright © 2022, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Image segmentation

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Why is the Winner the Best?

Why is the Winner the Best?

引用

Conference on computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

作者： M. Eisenmann A. Reinke V. Weru M. D. Tizabi F. Isensee T. J. Adler S. Ali V. Andrearczyk M. Aubreville U. Baid S. Bakas N. Balu S. Bano J. Bernal S. Bodenstedt A. Casella V. Cheplygina M. Daum M. De Bruijne A. Depeursinge R. Dorent J. Egger D. G. Ellis S. Engelhardt M. Ganz N. Ghatwary G. Girard P. Godau A. Gupta L. Hansen K. Harada M. Heinrich N. Heller A. Hering A. Huaulmé P. Jannin A. E. Kavur O. Kodym M. Kozubek J. Li H. Li J. Ma C. Martín-Isla B. Menze A. Noble V. Oreiller N. Padoy S. Pati K. Payette T. Rädsch J. Rafael-Patiño V. Singh Bawa S. Speidel C. H. Sudre K. Van Wijnen M. Wagner D. Wei A. Yamlahi M. H. Yap C. Yuan M. Zenk A. Zia D. Zimmerer D. Aydogan B. Bhattarai L. Bloch R. Brüngel J. Cho C. Choi Q. Dou I. Ezhov C. M. Friedrich C. Fuller R. R. Gaire A. Galdran Á. García Faura M. Grammatikopoulou S. Hong M. Jahanifar I. Jang A. Kadkhodamohammadi I. Kang F. Kofler S. Kondo H. Kuijf M. Li M. Luu T. Martinčič P. Morais M. A. Naser B. Oliveira D. Owen S. Pang J. Park S. Park S. Płotka E. Puybareau N. Rajpoot K. Ryu N. Saeed A. Shephard P. Shi D. Štepec R. Subedi G. Tochon H. R. Torres H. Urien J. L. Vilaça K. A. Wahid H. Wang J. Wang L. Wang X. Wang B. Wiestler M. Wodzinski F. Xia J. Xie Z. Xiong S. Yang Y. Yang Z. Zhao K. Maier-Hein P. F. Jäger A. Kopp-Schneider L. Maier-Hein Division of Intelligent Medical Systems German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Helmholtz Imaging German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Division of Biostatistics German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Division of Medical Image Computing German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences School of Computing University of Leeds Leeds UK Institute of Informatics School of Management HES-SO Valais-Wallis University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland Sierre Switzerland Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Lausanne University Hospital Lausanne Switzerland Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt Ingolstadt Germany Center for Artificial Intelligence and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D) and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA) University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Radiology University of Washington Seattle WA USA Department of Computer Science Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS) University College London London UK Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona & Computer Vision Center Barcelona Spain Division of Translational Surgical Oncology National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC) Dresden Dresden Germany Department of Advanced Robotics Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia Italy Department of Electronics Information and Bioengineering Politecnico di Milano Milan Italy IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Department of General Visceral and Transplantation Surgery Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany Department of Radiology and Nuc

International benchmarking competitions have become fundamental for the comparative performance assessment of image analysis methods. However, little attention has been given to investigating what can be learnt from these competitions. Do they really generate scientific progress? What are common and successful participation strategies? What makes a solution superior to a competing method? To address this gap in the literature, we performed a multicenter study with all 80 competitions that were conducted in the scope of IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021. Statistical analyses performed based on comprehensive descriptions of the submitted algorithms linked to their rank as well as the underlying participation strategies revealed common characteristics of winning solutions. These typically include the use of multi-task learning (63%) and/or multi-stage pipelines (61%), and a focus on augmentation (100%), image preprocessing (97%), data curation (79%), and post-processing (66%). The “typical” lead of a winning team is a computer scientist with a doctoral degree, five years of experience in biomedical image analysis, and four years of experience in deep learning. Two core general development strategies stood out for highly-ranked teams: the reflection of the metrics in the method design and the focus on analyzing and handling failure cases. According to the organizers, 43% of the winning algorithms exceeded the state of the art but only 11% completely solved the respective domain problem. The insights of our study could help researchers (1) improve algorithm development strategies when approaching new problems, and (2) focus on open research questions revealed by this work.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

FUTURE-AI: International consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcare

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2023年

作者： Lekadir, Karim Feragen, Aasa Fofanah, Abdul Joseph Frangi, Alejandro F. Buyx, Alena Emelie, Anais Lara, Andrea Porras, Antonio R. Chan, An-Wen Navarro, Arcadi Glocker, Ben Botwe, Benard O. Khanal, Bishesh Beger, Brigit Wu, Carol C. Cintas, Celia Langlotz, Curtis P. Rueckert, Daniel Mzurikwao, Deogratias Fotiadis, Dimitrios I. Zhussupov, Doszhan Ferrante, Enzo Meijering, Erik Weicken, Eva González, Fabio A. Asselbergs, Folkert W. Prior, Fred Krestin, Gabriel P. Collins, Gary S. Tegenaw, Geletaw S. Kaissis, Georgios Misuraca, Gianluca Tsakou, Gianna Dwivedi, Girish Kondylakis, Haridimos Jayakody, Harsha Woodruf, Henry C. Mayer, Horst Joachim Aerts, Hugo JWL Walsh, Ian Chouvarda, Ioanna Buvat, Irène Tributsch, Isabell Rekik, Islem Duncan, James Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree Zahir, Jihad Park, Jinah Mongan, John Gichoya, Judy W. Schnabel, Julia A. Kushibar, Kaisar Riklund, Katrine Mori, Kensaku Marias, Kostas Amugongo, Lameck M. Fromont, Lauren A. Maier-Hein, Lena Alberich, Leonor Cerdá Rittner, Leticia Phiri, Lighton Marrakchi-Kacem, Linda Donoso-Bach, Lluís Martí-Bonmatí, Luis Cardoso, M. Jorge Bobowicz, Maciej Shabani, Mahsa Tsiknakis, Manolis Zuluaga, Maria A. Bielikova, Maria Fritzsche, Marie-Christine Camacho, Marina Linguraru, Marius George Wenzel, Markus De Bruijne, Marleen Tolsgaard, Martin G. Ghassemi, Marzyeh Ashrafuzzaman, Md Goisauf, Melanie Yaqub, Mohammad Abadía, Mónica Cano Mahmoud, Mukhtar M.E. Elattar, Mustafa Rieke, Nicola Papanikolaou, Nikolaos Lazrak, Noussair Díaz, Oliver Salvado, Olivier Pujol, Oriol Sall, Ousmane Guevara, Pamela Gordebeke, Peter Lambin, Philippe Brown, Pieta Abolmaesumi, Purang Dou, Qi Lu, Qinghua Osuala, Richard Nakasi, Rose Zhou, S. Kevin Napel, Sandy Colantonio, Sara Albarqouni, Shadi Joshi, Smriti Carter, Stacy Klein, Stefan Petersen, Steffen E. Aussó, Susanna Awate, Suyash Raviv, Tammy Riklin Cook, Tessa Mutsvangwa, Tinashe E.M. Rogers, Wendy A. Niessen, Wiro J. Puig-Bosch, Xènia Zeng, Yi Mohammed, Yunusa G. Aquino, Yves Saint James Salahuddin, Zohaib Starmans, Martijn P.A. Department de Matemàtiques i Informàtica Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain Barcelona Spain DTU Compute Technical University of Denmark Kgs Lyngby Denmark Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Faculty of Science and Technology Milton Margai Technical University Freetown Sierra Leone Center for Computational Imaging & Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine Schools of Computing and Medicine University of Leeds Leeds United Kingdom Cardiovascular Science and Electronic Engineering Departments KU Leuven Leuven Belgium Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine Technical University of Munich Munich Germany Faculty of Engineering of Systems Informatics and Sciences of Computing Galileo University Guatemala City Guatemala Department of Biostatistics and Informatics Colorado School of Public Health University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus AuroraCO United States Department of Medicine Women’s College Research Institute University of Toronto Toronto Canada Universitat Pompeu Fabra BarcelonaBeta Brain Research Center Barcelona Spain Department of Computing Imperial College London London United Kingdom School of Biomedical & Allied Health Sciences University of Ghana Accra Ghana Department of Midwifery & Radiography School of Health & Psychological Sciences City University of London United Kingdom Kathmandu Nepal European Heart Network Brussels Belgium Department of Thoracic Imaging University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston United States IBM Research Africa Nairobi Kenya Departments of Radiology Medicine and Biomedical Data Science Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford United States Institute for AI and Informatics in Medicine Klinikum rechts der Isar Technical University Munich Munich Germany Department of Computing Imperial College London London United Kingdom Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences Dar es Salaam Tanzania United Republic of Ioannina Greece Almaty AI Lab Almaty Kazakhstan

Background: Despite major advances in artificial intelligence (AI) research for healthcare, the deployment and adoption of AI technologies remain limited in clinical practice. In recent years, concerns have been raised about the clinical, technical, ethical and legal risks associated with healthcare AI. To increase adoption in the real world, it is essential that AI technologies are trusted and accepted by patients, clinicians, health organisations and authorities. This paper describes the FUTURE-AI framework as the first international consensus guideline for trustworthy AI in healthcare. Methods: The FUTURE-AI consortium was founded in 2021 and now comprises 117 interdisciplinary experts from 50 countries representing all continents, including AI scientists, clinical researchers, biomedical ethicists, and social scientists. Over a two-year period, the consortium established guiding principles and best practices for trustworthy and deployable AI through an iterative process comprising an in-depth literature review, a modified Delphi survey, and online consensus meetings. Findings: The FUTURE-AI framework was established based on six guiding principles for trustworthy AI in healthcare, i.e. Fairness, Universality, Traceability, Usability, Robustness and Explainability. Through consensus, a set of 30 best practices were defined, addressing technical, clinical, socio-ethical and legal dimensions of trustworthy AI. The recommendations cover the entire lifecycle of healthcare AI, from design, development and validation to regulation, deployment, and monitoring. Interpretation: FUTURE-AI is a structured, risk-informed framework which provides guidance for constructing healthcare AI tools that will be trusted, deployed and adopted in real-world clinical practice. Researchers are encouraged to take the recommendations into account in proof-of-concept stages to facilitate future translation towards clinical practice of healthcare AI. Copyright © 2023, The Authors. All rights

关键词： Clinical research

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

FAIR for AI: An interdisciplinary and international community building perspective

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2022年

作者： Huerta, E.A. Blaiszik, Ben Brinson, L. Catherine Bouchard, Kristofer E. Diaz, Daniel Doglioni, Caterina Duarte, Javier M. Emani, Murali Foster, Ian Fox, Geoffrey Harris, Philip Heinrich, Lukas Jha, Shantenu Katz, Daniel S. Kindratenko, Volodymyr Kirkpatrick, Christine R. Lassila-Perini, Kati Madduri, Ravi K. Neubauer, Mark S. Psomopoulos, Fotis E. Roy, Avik Rübel, Oliver Zhao, Zhizhen Zhu, Ruike Data Science and Learning Division Argonne National Laboratory LemontIL60439 United States Department of Computer Science University of Chicago ChicagoIL60637 United States Globus University of Chicago ChicagoIL60637 United States Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science Duke University DurhamNC27708 United States Scientific Data Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory BerkeleyCA94720 United States Biological Systems & Engineering Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory BerkeleyCA94720 United States Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute University of California Berkeley BerkeleyCA94720 United States Department of Physics University of California La Jolla San DiegoCA92093 United States Lund University Department of Physics Box 118 Lund221 00 Sweden School of Physics & Astronomy The University of Manchester ManchesterM13 9PL United Kingdom Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory LemontIL60439 United States Biocomplexity Institute Department of Computer Science University of Virginia CharlottesvilleVA22904 United States Department of Physics Massachusetts Institute of Technology CambridgeMA02139 United States Technical University Munich Arcisstraße 21 München80333 Germany Computational Science Initiative Brookhaven National Laboratory UptonNY11973 United States Electrical and Computer Engineering Rutgers The State University of New Jersey PiscatawayNJ08854 United States National Center for Supercomputing Applications University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign UrbanaIL61801 United States Department of Computer Science University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign UrbanaIL61801 United States Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign UrbanaIL61801 United States School of Information Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign UrbanaIL61801 United States San Diego Supercomputer Center University of California La Jolla San DiegoCA

A foundational set of findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR) principles were proposed in 2016 as prerequisites for proper data management and stewardship, with the goal of enabling the reusability of scholarly data. The principles were also meant to apply to other digital assets, at a high level, and over time, the FAIR guiding principles have been reinterpreted or extended to include the software, tools, algorithms, and workflows that produce data. FAIR principles are now being adapted in the context of AI models and datasets. Here, we present the perspectives, vision, and experiences of researchers from different countries, disciplines, and backgrounds who are leading the definition and adoption of FAIR principles in their communities of practice, and discuss outcomes that may result from pursuing and incentivizing FAIR AI research. The material for this report builds on the FAIR for AI Workshop held at Argonne National Laboratory on June 7, 2022. Copyright © 2022, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Information management

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

A neuromorphic proto-object based dynamic visual saliency model with an FPGA implementation

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2020年

作者： Molin, Jamal Lottier Thakur, Chetan Singh Niebur, Ernst Etienne-Cummings, Ralph Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Lab Riverside Research 2640 Hibiscus Way BeavercreekOH45431 United States Department of Electronic Systems Engineering Indian Institute of Science Bangalore560012 India Department of Neuroscience Johns Hopkins University BaltimoreMD21218 United States Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Johns Hopkins University BaltimoreMD21218 United States

The ability to attend to salient regions of a visual scene is an innate and necessary preprocessing step for both biological and engineered systems performing high-level visual tasks (e.g. object detection, tracking, and classification). Computational efficiency, in regard to processing bandwidth and speed, is improved by only devoting computational resources to salient regions of the visual stimuli. In this paper, we first present a neuromorphic, bottom-up, dynamic visual saliency model based on the notion of proto-objects. This is achieved by incorporating the temporal characteristics of the visual stimulus into the model, similarly to the manner in which early stages of the human visual system extracts temporal information. This neuromorphic model outperforms state-of-the-art dynamic visual saliency models in predicting human eye fixations on a commonly-used video dataset with associated eye tracking data. Secondly, for this model to have practical applications, it must be capable of performing its computations in real-time under low-power, small-size, and lightweight constraints. To address this, we introduce a Field-Programmable Gate Array implementation of the model on an Opal Kelly 7350 Kintex-7 board. This novel hardware implementation allows for processing of up to 23.35 frames per second running on a 100 MHz clock – better than 26× speedup from the software implementation. Copyright © 2020, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Field programmable gate arrays (FPGA)

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Understanding metric-related pitfalls in image analysis validation

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2023年

作者： Reinke, Annika Tizabi, Minu D. Baumgartner, Michael Eisenmann, Matthias Heckmann-Nötzel, Doreen Kavur, A. Emre Rädsch, Tim Sudre, Carole H. Acion, Laura Antonelli, Michela Arbel, Tal Bakas, Spyridon Benis, Arriel Blaschko, Matthew B. Buettner, Florian Cardoso, M. Jorge Cheplygina, Veronika Chen, Jianxu Christodoulou, Evangelia Cimini, Beth A. Collins, Gary S. Farahani, Keyvan Ferrer, Luciana Galdran, Adrian van Ginneken, Bram Glocker, Ben Godau, Patrick Haase, Robert Hashimoto, Daniel A. Hoffman, Michael M. Huisman, Merel Isensee, Fabian Jannin, Pierre Kahn, Charles E. Kainmueller, Dagmar Kainz, Bernhard Karargyris, Alexandros Karthikesalingam, Alan Kenngott, Hannes Kleesiek, Jens Kofler, Florian Kooi, Thijs Kopp-Schneider, Annette Kozubek, Michal Kreshuk, Anna Kurc, Tahsin Landman, Bennett A. Litjens, Geert Madani, Amin Maier-Hein, Klaus Martel, Anne L. Mattson, Peter Meijering, Erik Menze, Bjoern Moons, Karel G.M. Müller, Henning Nichyporuk, Brennan Nickel, Felix Petersen, Jens Rafelski, Susanne M. Rajpoot, Nasir Reyes, Mauricio Riegler, Michael A. Rieke, Nicola Saez-Rodriguez, Julio Sánchez, Clara I. Shetty, Shravya Summers, Ronald M. Taha, Abdel A. Tiulpin, Aleksei Tsaftaris, Sotirios A. van Calster, Ben Varoquaux, Gaël Yaniv, Ziv R. Jäger, Paul F. Maier-Hein, Lena Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Heidelberg Division of Intelligent Medical Systems Germany NCT Heidelberg A Partnership Between DKFZ University Medical Center Heidelberg Germany Heidelberg Division of Medical Image Computing Germany Heidelberg Division of Intelligent Medical Systems Germany MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing Department of Computer Science University College London London United Kingdom School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Science King’s College London London United Kingdom Instituto de Cálculo CONICET – Universidad de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina Centre for Medical Image Computing University College London London United Kingdom McGill University Montreal Canada Division of Computational Pathology Dept of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine IU Health Information and Translational Sciences Building Indianapolis United States University of Pennsylvania Richards Medical Research Laboratories FL7 PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Digital Medical Technologies Holon Institute of Technology Holon Israel European Federation for Medical Informatics Le Mont-sur-Lausanne Switzerland Center for Processing Speech and Images Department of Electrical Engineering KU Leuven Leuven Belgium partner site Frankfurt/Mainz a partnership between DKFZ and UCT Frankfurt Marburg Germany Heidelberg Germany Goethe University Frankfurt Department of Medicine Germany Goethe University Frankfurt Department of Informatics Germany and Frankfurt Cancer Insititute Germany Department of Computer Science IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Leibniz-Institut für Analytische Wissenschaften – ISAS – e.V. Dortmund Germany Imaging Platform Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard CambridgeMA United States Centre for Statistics in Medicine University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom Center for Biomedical In

Validation metrics are key for tracking scientific progress and bridging the current chasm between artificial intelligence (AI) research and its translation into practice. However, increasing evidence shows that particularly in image analysis, metrics are often chosen inadequately. While taking into account the individual strengths, weaknesses, and limitations of validation metrics is a critical prerequisite to making educated choices, the relevant knowledge is currently scattered and poorly accessible to individual researchers. Based on a multi-stage Delphi process conducted by a multidisciplinary expert consortium as well as extensive community feedback, the present work provides the first reliable and comprehensive common point of access to information on pitfalls related to validation metrics in image analysis. While focused on biomedical image analysis, the addressed pitfalls generalize across application domains and are categorized according to a newly created, domain-agnostic taxonomy. The work serves to enhance global comprehension of a key topic in image analysis validation. © 2023, CC BY.

关键词： computer vision

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Optimal Client Sampling for Federated learning

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2020年

作者： Chen, Wenlin Horváth, Samuel Richtárik, Peter Department of Engineering University of Cambridge CambridgeCB2 1PZ United Kingdom Department of Empirical Inference Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems Tübingen72076 Germany Department of Machine Learning Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence Masdar City Abu Dhabi United Arab Emirates Computer Electrical and Mathematical Science and Engineering Division King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Thuwal23955-6900 Saudi Arabia

It is well understood that client-master communication can be a primary bottleneck in federated learning (FL). In this work, we address this issue with a novel client subsampling scheme, where we restrict the number of clients allowed to communicate their updates back to the master node. In each communication round, all participating clients compute their updates, but only the ones with "important" updates communicate back to the master. We show that importance can be measured using only the norm of the update and give a formula for optimal client participation. This formula minimizes the distance between the full update, where all clients participate, and our limited update, where the number of participating clients is restricted. In addition, we provide a simple algorithm that approximates the optimal formula for client participation, which allows for secure aggregation and stateless clients, and thus does not compromise client privacy. We show both theoretically and empirically that for Distributed SGD (DSGD) and Federated Averaging (FedAvg), the performance of our approach can be close to full participation and superior to the baseline where participating clients are sampled uniformly. Moreover, our approach is orthogonal to and compatible with existing methods for reducing communication overhead, such as local methods and communication compression methods. Copyright © 2020, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Machine learning

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Uplink-downlink duality between multiple-access and broadcast channels with compressing relays

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2020年

作者： Liu, Liang Liu, Ya-Feng Patil, Pratik Yu, Wei the Department of Electronic and Information Engineering The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong the State Key Laboratory of Scientific and Engineering Computing Institute of Computational Mathematics and Scientific/Engineering Computing Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing100190 China The Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering the University of Toronto the Department of Statistics and Data Science and the Machine Learning Department Carnegie Mellon University PittsburghPA15213 United States The Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Toronto 10 King’s College Road TorontoONM5S3G4 Canada

—Uplink-downlink duality refers to the fact that under a sum-power constraint, the capacity regions of a Gaussian multiple-access channel and a Gaussian broadcast channel with Hermitian transposed channel matrices are identical. This paper generalizes this result to a cooperative cellular network, in which remote access-points are deployed as relays in serving the users under the coordination of a central processor (CP). In this model, the users and the relays are connected over noisy wireless links, while the relays and the CP are connected over noiseless but rate-limited fronthaul links. Based on a Lagrangian technique, this paper establishes a duality relationship between such a multiple-access relay channel and broadcast relay channel, under the assumption that the relays use compression-based strategies. Specifically, we show that under the same total transmit power constraint and individual fronthaul rate constraints, the achievable rate regions of the Gaussian multiple-access and broadcast relay channels are identical, when either independent compression or Wyner-Ziv and multivariate compression strategies are used. The key observations are that if the beamforming vectors at the relays are fixed, the sum-power minimization problems under the achievable rate and fronthaul constraints in both the uplink and the downlink can be transformed into either a linear programming or a semidefinite programming problem depending on the compression technique, and that the uplink and downlink problems are Lagrangian duals of each other. Moreover, the dual variables corresponding to the downlink rate constraints become the uplink powers;the dual variables corresponding to the downlink fronthaul constraints become the uplink quantization noises. This duality relationship enables an efficient algorithm for optimizing the downlink transmission and relaying strategies based on the uplink. Copyright © 2020, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Linear programming

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：