检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

arXiv 2021年

作者： Wang, Qizhou Yao, Jiangchao Gong, Chen Liu, Tongliang Gong, Mingming Yang, Hongxia Han, Bo Department of Computer Science Hong Kong Baptist University Hong Kong Key Laboratory of Intelligent Perception and Systems for High-Dimensional Information of MoE School of Computer Science and Engineering Nanjing University of Science and Technology China Data Analytics and Intelligence Lab Alibaba Group China Department of Computing Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong Trustworthy Machine Learning Lab School of Computer Science University of Sydney Australia School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Melbourne Australia

machine learning in the context of noise is a challenging but practical setting to plenty of real-world applications. Most of the previous approaches in this area focus on the pairwise relation (casual or correlational relationship) with noise, such as learning with noisy labels. However, the group noise, which is parasitic on the coarse-grained accurate relation with the fine-grained uncertainty, is also universal and has not been well investigated. The challenge under this setting is how to discover true pairwise connections concealed by the group relation with its fine-grained noise. To overcome this issue, we propose a novel Max-Matching method for learning with group noise. Specifically, it utilizes a matching mechanism to evaluate the relation confidence of each object (cf. Figure 1) w.r.t. the target, meanwhile considering the Non-IID characteristics among objects in the group. Only the most confident object is considered to learn the model, so that the fine-grained noise is mostly dropped. The performance on a range of real-world datasets in the area of several learning paradigms demonstrates the effectiveness of Max-Matching. Copyright © 2021, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： machine learning

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Strategic priorities for transformative progress in advancing biology with proteomics and artificial intelligence

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2025年

作者： Sun, Yingying Jun, A. Liu, Zhiwei Sun, Rui Qian, Liujia Payne, Samuel H. Bittremieux, Wout Ralser, Markus Li, Chen Chen, Yi Dong, Zhen Perez-Riverol, Yasset Khan, Asif Sander, Chris Aebersold, Ruedi Vizcaíno, Juan Antonio Krieger, Jonathan R. Yao, Jianhua Wen, Han Zhang, Linfeng Zhu, Yunping Xuan, Yue Sun, Benjamin Boyang Qiao, Liang Hermjakob, Henning Tang, Haixu Gao, Huanhuan Deng, Yamin Zhong, Qing Chang, Cheng Bandeira, Nuno Li, Ming Weinan, E. Sun, Siqi Yang, Yuedong Omenn, Gilbert S. Zhang, Yue Xu, Ping Fu, Yan Liu, Xiaowen Overall, Christopher M. Wang, Yu Deutsch, Eric W. Chen, Luonan Cox, Jürgen Demichev, Vadim He, Fuchu Huang, Jiaxing Jin, Huilin Liu, Chao Li, Nan Luan, Zhongzhi Song, Jiangning Yu, Kaicheng Wan, Wanggen Wang, Tai Zhang, Kang Zhang, Le Bell, Peter A. Mann, Matthias Zhang, Bing Guo, Tiannan Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital State Key Laboratory of Medical Proteomics School of Medicine Westlake University Zhejiang Province Hangzhou China Westlake Center for Intelligent Proteomics Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine Zhejiang Province Hangzhou China Biology Department Brigham Young University ProvoUT84602 United States Department of Computer Science University of Antwerp Antwerp2020 Belgium Department of Biochemistry CharitéUniversitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany Biomedicine Discovery Institute Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Monash University MelbourneVICVIC 3800 Australia Wellcome Genome Campus Hinxton CambridgeCB10 1SD United Kingdom Harvard Medical School Ludwig Center at Harvard United States Harvard Medical School Broad Institute Ludwig Center at Harvard Dana-Farber Cancer Institute United States Department of Biology Institute of Molecular Systems Biology ETH Zürich Zürich Switzerland Bruker Ltd. MiltonONL9T 6P4 Canada AI for Life Sciences Lab Tencent Shenzhen518057 China State Key Laboratory of Medical Proteomics AI for Science Institute Beijing100080 China Beijing Institute of Lifeomics Beijing102206 China Thermo Fisher Scientific GmbH Hanna-Kunath Str. 11 Bremen28199 Germany Informatics and Predictive Sciences Research Bristol Myers Squibb United States Department of Chemistry Fudan University Songhu Road 2005 Shanghai200438 China Department of Computer Science Luddy School of Informatics Computing and Engineering Indiana University IN47408 United States ProCan® Children’s Medical Research Institute Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney WestmeadNSW Australia La Jolla CA United States Central China Institute of Artificial Intelligence University of Waterloo Canada AI for Science Institute Center for Machine Learning Research School of Mathematical Sciences Peking University China Research Institute of Intelligent Complex Systems Fudan U

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming scientific research, including proteomics. Advances in mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics data quality, diversity, and scale, combined with groundbreaking AI techniques, are unlocking new challenges and opportunities in biological discovery. Here, we highlight key areas where AI is driving innovation, from data analysis to new biological insights. These include developing an AI-friendly ecosystem for proteomics data generation, sharing, and analysis;improving peptide and protein identification and quantification;characterizing protein-protein interactions and protein complexes;advancing spatial and perturbation proteomics;integrating multi-omics data;and ultimately enabling AI-empowered virtual cells. © 2025, CC BY.

关键词： Biotic

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Overview of the Tenth Dialog System Technology Challenge: DSTC10

引用

IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing 2024年 32卷 765-778页

作者： Yoshino, Koichiro Chen, Yun-Nung Crook, Paul Kottur, Satwik Li, Jinchao Hedayatnia, Behnam Moon, Seungwhan Fei, Zhengcong Li, Zekang Zhang, Jinchao Feng, Yang Zhou, Jie Kim, Seokhwan Liu, Yang Jin, Di Papangelis, Alexandros Gopalakrishnan, Karthik Hakkani-Tur, Dilek Damavandi, Babak Geramifard, Alborz Hori, Chiori Shah, Ankit Zhang, Chen Li, Haizhou Sedoc, Joao D'haro, Luis F. Banchs, Rafael Rudnicky, Alexander Guardian Robot Project R-IH RIKEN 2-2-2 Hikaridai Seika Shoraku619-0288 Japan Information Science Nara Institute of Science and Technology Ikoma630-0101 Japan Computer Science and Information Engineering National Taiwan University Taipei10617 Taiwan Inc. Palo AltoCA95054 United States Alexa AI *** Inc. SunnyvaleCA94089 United States Meta Seattle RedmondWA98052 United States Institute of Computing Technology Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing100190 China Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing Institute of Computing Technology Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing100190 China Tencent AI Lab Beijing Beijing China Kexueyuan South Road Zhongguancun Beijing100190 China Beijing 100190 China Alexa AI *** Inc. SunnyvaleCA United States 1120 Enterprise way Sunnyvale94089 United States *** Inc. SeattleWA United States Menlo Park CA United States Audio and Speech Group Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories CambridgeMA02139-1955 United States Carnegie Mellon University Department of Language and Information Technologies or just Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh United States National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore Shenzhen Research Institute of Big Data School of Data Science Chinese University of Hong Kong Shenzhen518172 China New York University New YorkNY United States ETSI de Telecomunicacion - Speech Technology and Machine Learning Group Universidad Politecnica de Madrid Ciudad Universitaria Madrid28040 Spain Nanyang Technological University Singapore Singapore Carnegie Mellon University PittsburghPA United States

This article introduces the Tenth Dialog System Technology Challenge (DSTC-10). This edition of the DSTC focuses on applying end-to-end dialog technologies for five distinct tasks in dialog systems, namely 1. Incorporation of Meme images into open domain dialogs, 2. Knowledge-grounded Task-oriented Dialogue Modeling on Spoken Conversations, 3. Situated Interactive Multimodal dialogs, 4. Reasoning for Audio Visual Scene-Aware Dialog, and 5. Automatic Evaluation and Moderation of Open-domainDialogue Systems. This article describes the task definition, provided datasets, baselines, and evaluation setup for each track. We also summarize the results of the submitted systems to highlight the general trends of the state-of-the-art technologies for the tasks. © 2023 The Authors.

关键词： Job analysis

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Why is the Winner the Best?

Why is the Winner the Best?

引用

Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

作者： M. Eisenmann A. Reinke V. Weru M. D. Tizabi F. Isensee T. J. Adler S. Ali V. Andrearczyk M. Aubreville U. Baid S. Bakas N. Balu S. Bano J. Bernal S. Bodenstedt A. Casella V. Cheplygina M. Daum M. De Bruijne A. Depeursinge R. Dorent J. Egger D. G. Ellis S. Engelhardt M. Ganz N. Ghatwary G. Girard P. Godau A. Gupta L. Hansen K. Harada M. Heinrich N. Heller A. Hering A. Huaulmé P. Jannin A. E. Kavur O. Kodym M. Kozubek J. Li H. Li J. Ma C. Martín-Isla B. Menze A. Noble V. Oreiller N. Padoy S. Pati K. Payette T. Rädsch J. Rafael-Patiño V. Singh Bawa S. Speidel C. H. Sudre K. Van Wijnen M. Wagner D. Wei A. Yamlahi M. H. Yap C. Yuan M. Zenk A. Zia D. Zimmerer D. Aydogan B. Bhattarai L. Bloch R. Brüngel J. Cho C. Choi Q. Dou I. Ezhov C. M. Friedrich C. Fuller R. R. Gaire A. Galdran Á. García Faura M. Grammatikopoulou S. Hong M. Jahanifar I. Jang A. Kadkhodamohammadi I. Kang F. Kofler S. Kondo H. Kuijf M. Li M. Luu T. Martinčič P. Morais M. A. Naser B. Oliveira D. Owen S. Pang J. Park S. Park S. Płotka E. Puybareau N. Rajpoot K. Ryu N. Saeed A. Shephard P. Shi D. Štepec R. Subedi G. Tochon H. R. Torres H. Urien J. L. Vilaça K. A. Wahid H. Wang J. Wang L. Wang X. Wang B. Wiestler M. Wodzinski F. Xia J. Xie Z. Xiong S. Yang Y. Yang Z. Zhao K. Maier-Hein P. F. Jäger A. Kopp-Schneider L. Maier-Hein Division of Intelligent Medical Systems German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Helmholtz Imaging German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Division of Biostatistics German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Division of Medical Image Computing German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences School of Computing University of Leeds Leeds UK Institute of Informatics School of Management HES-SO Valais-Wallis University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland Sierre Switzerland Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Lausanne University Hospital Lausanne Switzerland Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt Ingolstadt Germany Center for Artificial Intelligence and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D) and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA) University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Radiology University of Washington Seattle WA USA Department of Computer Science Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS) University College London London UK Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona & Computer Vision Center Barcelona Spain Division of Translational Surgical Oncology National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC) Dresden Dresden Germany Department of Advanced Robotics Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia Italy Department of Electronics Information and Bioengineering Politecnico di Milano Milan Italy IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Department of General Visceral and Transplantation Surgery Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany Department of Radiology and Nuc

International benchmarking competitions have become fundamental for the comparative performance assessment of image analysis methods. However, little attention has been given to investigating what can be learnt from these competitions. Do they really generate scientific progress? What are common and successful participation strategies? What makes a solution superior to a competing method? To address this gap in the literature, we performed a multicenter study with all 80 competitions that were conducted in the scope of IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021. Statistical analyses performed based on comprehensive descriptions of the submitted algorithms linked to their rank as well as the underlying participation strategies revealed common characteristics of winning solutions. These typically include the use of multi-task learning (63%) and/or multi-stage pipelines (61%), and a focus on augmentation (100%), image preprocessing (97%), data curation (79%), and post-processing (66%). The “typical” lead of a winning team is a computer scientist with a doctoral degree, five years of experience in biomedical image analysis, and four years of experience in deep learning. Two core general development strategies stood out for highly-ranked teams: the reflection of the metrics in the method design and the focus on analyzing and handling failure cases. According to the organizers, 43% of the winning algorithms exceeded the state of the art but only 11% completely solved the respective domain problem. The insights of our study could help researchers (1) improve algorithm development strategies when approaching new problems, and (2) focus on open research questions revealed by this work.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Biomedical image analysis competitions: The state of current participation practice

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2022年

作者： Eisenmann, Matthias Reinke, Annika Weru, Vivienn Tizabi, Minu Dietlinde Isensee, Fabian Adler, Tim J. Godau, Patrick Cheplygina, Veronika Kozubek, Michal Maier-Hein, Klaus Jäger, Paul F. Kopp-Schneider, Annette Maier-Hein, Lena Ali, Sharib Gupta, Anubha Kybic, Jan Noble, Alison de Solórzano, Carlos Ortiz Pachade, Samiksha Petitjean, Caroline Sage, Daniel Wei, Donglai Wilden, Elizabeth Alapatt, Deepak Andrearczyk, Vincent Baid, Ujjwal Bakas, Spyridon Balu, Niranjan Bano, Sophia Bawa, Vivek Singh Bernal, Jorge Bodenstedt, Sebastian Casella, Alessandro Choi, Jinwook Commowick, Olivier Daum, Marie Depeursinge, Adrien Dorent, Reuben Egger, Jan Eichhorn, Hannah Engelhardt, Sandy Ganz, Melanie Girard, Gabriel Hansen, Lasse Heinrich, Mattias Heller, Nicholas Hering, Alessa Huaulmé, Arnaud Kim, Hyunjeong Li, Hongwei Bran Landman, Bennett Li, Jianning Ma, Jun Martel, Anne Martín-Isla, Carlos Menze, Bjoern Nwoye, Chinedu Innocent Oreiller, Valentin Padoy, Nicolas Pati, Sarthak Payette, Kelly Sudre, Carole van Wijnen, Kimberlin Vardazaryan, Armine Vercauteren, Tom Wagner, Martin Wang, Chuanbo Yap, Moi Hoon Yu, Zeyun Yuan, Chun Zenk, Maximilian Zia, Aneeq Zimmerer, David Bao, Rina Choi, Chanyeol Cohen, Andrew Dzyubachyk, Oleh Galdran, Adrian Gan, Tianyuan Guo, Tianqi Gupta, Pradyumna Haithami, Mahmood Ho, Edward Jang, Ikbeom Li, Zhili Luo, Zhengbo Lux, Filip Makrogiannis, Sokratis Müller, Dominik Oh, Young-Tack Pang, Subeen Pape, Constantin Polat, Gorkem Reed, Charlotte Rosalie Ryu, Kanghyun Scherr, Tim Thambawita, Vajira Wang, Haoyu Wang, Xinliang Xu, Kele Yeh, Hung Yeo, Doyeob Yuan, Yixuan Zeng, Yan Zhao, Xin Abbing, Julian Adam, Jannes Adluru, Nagesh Agethen, Niklas Ahmed, Salman Al Khalil, Yasmina Alenyà, Mireia Alhoniemi, Esa An, Chengyang Arega, Tewodros Weldebirhan Avisdris, Netanell Aydogan, Dogu Baran Bai, Yingbin Calisto, Maria Baldeon Basaran, Berke Doga Beetz, Marcel Bian, Hao Blansit, Kevin Bloch, Louise Bohnsack, Robert Bosticardo, Sara Breen, Jack Brudfors, Mikael Brüngel, Raphael Cabezas, Mariano Cacciola, Alb Heidelberg Division of Intelligent Medical Systems Germany Heidelberg HI Helmholtz Imaging Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Heidelberg Division of Biostatistics Germany Heidelberg Division of Medical Image Computing Germany Heidelberg HI Applied Vision Lab Germany IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic Heidelberg Interactive Machine Learning Group Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science and Medical Faculty Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany NCT Heidelberg DKFZ University Hospital Heidelberg Germany School of Computing University of Leeds Leeds United Kingdom SBILab Department of ECE IIIT-Delhi India Faculty of Electrical Engineering Czech Technical University Prague Czech Republic Institute of Biomedical Engineering University of Oxford United Kingdom Center for Applied Medical Research Pamplona Spain Shri Guru Gobind Singhji Institute of Engineering and Technology Maharashtra Nanded India Université de Rouen Normandie France Lausanne Switzerland School of Engineering and Applied Science Harvard University United States ICube University of Strasbourg CNRS France Institute of Informatics School of Management HES-SO Valais-Wallis University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland Techno-Pôle 3 Sierre3960 Switzerland Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Lausanne University Hospital Rue du Bugnon 46 LausanneCH-1011 Switzerland University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology University of Washington United States Wellcome EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences University College London London United Kingdom Visual Artificial Intelligence Lab Oxford Brookes University Oxford United Kingdom Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona & Computer Vision Center Spain Dresden Fetscherstraße 74 PF 64 Dresden01307 Germany

The number of international benchmarking competitions is steadily increasing in various fields of machine learning (ML) research and practice. So far, however, little is known about the common practice as well as bottlenecks faced by the community in tackling the research questions posed. To shed light on the status quo of algorithm development in the specific field of biomedical imaging analysis, we designed an international survey that was issued to all participants of challenges conducted in conjunction with the IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021 conferences (80 competitions in total). The survey covered participants' expertise and working environments, their chosen strategies, as well as algorithm characteristics. A median of 72% challenge participants took part in the survey. According to our results, knowledge exchange was the primary incentive (70%) for participation, while the reception of prize money played only a minor role (16%). While a median of 80 working hours was spent on method development, a large portion of participants stated that they did not have enough time for method development (32%). 25% perceived the infrastructure to be a bottleneck. Overall, 94% of all solutions were deep learning-based. Of these, 84% were based on standard architectures. 43% of the respondents reported that the data samples (e.g., images) were too large to be processed at once. This was most commonly addressed by patch-based training (69%), downsampling (37%), and solving 3D analysis tasks as a series of 2D tasks. K-fold cross-validation on the training set was performed by only 37% of the participants and only 50% of the participants performed ensembling based on multiple identical models (61%) or heterogeneous models (39%). 48% of the respondents applied postprocessing steps. © 2022, CC BY.

关键词： Benchmarking

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：