检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

QU-BraTS: MICCAI BraTS 2020 Challenge on Quantifying Uncertainty in Brain Tumor Segmentation - Analysis of Ranking Scores and Benchmarking Results

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2021年

作者： Mehta, Raghav Filos, Angelos Baid, Ujjwal Sako, Chiharu McKinley, Richard Rebsamen, Michael Dätwyler, Katrin Meier, Raphael Radojewski, Piotr Murugesan, Gowtham Krishnan Nalawade, Sahil Ganesh, Chandan Wagner, Ben Yu, Fang F. Fei, Baowei Madhuranthakam, Ananth J. Maldjian, Joseph A. Daza, Laura Gómez, Catalina Arbeláez, Pablo Dai, Chengliang Wang, Shuo Reynaud, Hadrien Mo, Yuanhan Angelini, Elsa Guo, Yike Bai, Wenjia Banerjee, Subhashis Pei, Linmin Murat, A.K. Rosas-González, Sarahi Zemmoura, Ilyess Tauber, Clovis Vu, Minh H. Nyholm, Tufve Löfstedt, Tommy Ballestar, Laura Mora Vilaplana, Veronica McHugh, Hugh Talou, Gonzalo Maso Wang, Alan Patel, Jay Chang, Ken Hoebel, Katharina Gidwani, Mishka Arun, Nishanth Gupta, Sharut Aggarwal, Mehak Singh, Praveer Gerstner, Elizabeth R. Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree Boutry, Nicolas Huard, Alexis Vidyaratne, Lasitha Rahman, Md Monibor Iftekharuddin, Khan M. Chazalon, Joseph Puybareau, Elodie Tochon, Guillaume Ma, Jun Cabezas, Mariano Llado, Xavier Oliver, Arnau Valencia, Liliana Valverde, Sergi Amian, Mehdi Soltaninejad, Mohammadreza Myronenko, Andriy Hatamizadeh, Ali Feng, Xue Dou, Quan Tustison, Nicholas Meyer, Craig Shah, Nisarg A. Talbar, Sanjay Weber, Marc-André Mahajan, Abhishek Jakab, Andras Wiest, Roland Fathallah-Shaykh, Hassan M. Nazeri, Arash Milchenko, Mikhail Marcus, Daniel Kotrotsou, Aikaterini Colen, Rivka Freymann, John Kirby, Justin Davatzikos, Christos Menze, Bjoern Bakas, Spyridon Gal, Yarin Arbel, Tal McGill University MontrealQC Canada Group University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine The University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology University of Bern Inselspital Bern University Hospital Bern Switzerland Department of Radiology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center DallasTX United States Department of Bioengineering University of Texas DallasTX United States Advanced Imaging Research Center University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center DallasTX United States Universidad de los Andes Bogotá Colombia Data Science Institute Imperial College London London United Kingdom NIHR Imperial BRC ITMAT Data Science Group Imperial College London London United Kingdom Department of Brain Sciences Imperial College London London United Kingdom Machine Intelligence Unit Indian Statistical Institute Kolkata India Department of CSE University of Calcutta Kolkata India Department of Information Technology Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden Department of Diagnostic Radiology The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center PittsburghPA United States UMR U1253 iBrain Université de Tours Inserm Tours France Department of Radiation Sciences Umeå University Umeå Sweden Department of Computing Science Umeå University Umeå Sweden Signal Theory and Communications Department Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Barcelona Tech Barcelona Spain Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand Radiology Department Auckland City Hospital Auckland New Zealand Auckland Bioengineering Institute University of Auckland New Zealand Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging Department of Radiology

Deep learning (DL) models have provided state-of-the-art performance in various medical imaging benchmarking challenges, including the Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenges. However, the task of focal pathology multi-compartment segmentation (e.g., tumor and lesion sub-regions) is particularly challenging, and potential errors hinder translating DL models into clinical workflows. Quantifying the reliability of DL model predictions in the form of uncertainties could enable clinical review of the most uncertain regions, thereby building trust and paving the way toward clinical translation. Several uncertainty estimation methods have recently been introduced for DL medical image segmentation tasks. Developing scores to evaluate and compare the performance of uncertainty measures will assist the end-user in making more informed decisions. In this study, we explore and evaluate a score developed during the BraTS 2019 and BraTS 2020 task on uncertainty quantification (QU-BraTS) and designed to assess and rank uncertainty estimates for brain tumor multi-compartment segmentation. This score (1) rewards uncertainty estimates that produce high confidence in correct assertions and those that assign low confidence levels at incorrect assertions, and (2) penalizes uncertainty measures that lead to a higher percentage of under-confident correct assertions. We further benchmark the segmentation uncertainties generated by 14 independent participating teams of QU-BraTS 2020, all of which also participated in the main BraTS segmentation task. Overall, our findings confirm the importance and complementary value that uncertainty estimates provide to segmentation algorithms, highlighting the need for uncertainty quantification in medical image analyses. Finally, in favor of transparency and reproducibility, our evaluation code is made publicly available at https://***/RagMeh11/QU-BraTS. © 2021, CC BY.

关键词： Benchmarking

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

BigNeuron: a resource to benchmark and predict performance of algorithms for automated tracing of neurons in light microscopy datasets

引用

Nature methods 2023年第6期20卷 824-835页

作者： Linus Manubens-Gil Zhi Zhou Hanbo Chen Arvind Ramanathan Xiaoxiao Liu Yufeng Liu Alessandro Bria Todd Gillette Zongcai Ruan Jian Yang Miroslav Radojević Ting Zhao Li Cheng Lei Qu Siqi Liu Kristofer E Bouchard Lin Gu Weidong Cai Shuiwang Ji Badrinath Roysam Ching-Wei Wang Hongchuan Yu Amos Sironi Daniel Maxim Iascone Jie Zhou Erhan Bas Eduardo Conde-Sousa Paulo Aguiar Xiang Li Yujie Li Sumit Nanda Yuan Wang Leila Muresan Pascal Fua Bing Ye Hai-Yan He Jochen F Staiger Manuel Peter Daniel N Cox Michel Simonneau Marcel Oberlaender Gregory Jefferis Kei Ito Paloma Gonzalez-Bellido Jinhyun Kim Edwin Rubel Hollis T Cline Hongkui Zeng Aljoscha Nern Ann-Shyn Chiang Jianhua Yao Jane Roskams Rick Livesey Janine Stevens Tianming Liu Chinh Dang Yike Guo Ning Zhong Georgia Tourassi Sean Hill Michael Hawrylycz Christof Koch Erik Meijering Giorgio A Ascoli Hanchuan Peng Institute for Brain and Intelligence Southeast University Nanjing China. Microsoft Corporation Redmond WA USA. Tencent AI Lab Bellevue WA USA. Computing Environment and Life Sciences Directorate Argonne National Laboratory Lemont IL USA. Kaya Medical Seattle WA USA. University of Cassino and Southern Lazio Cassino Italy. Center for Neural Informatics Structures and Plasticity Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study George Mason University Fairfax VA USA. Faculty of Information Technology Beijing University of Technology Beijing China. Beijing International Collaboration Base on Brain Informatics and Wisdom Services Beijing China. Nuctech Netherlands Rotterdam the Netherlands. Janelia Research Campus Howard Hughes Medical Institute Ashburn VA USA. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada. Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Intelligent Computation and Signal Processing Anhui University Hefei China. Paige AI New York NY USA. Scientific Data Division and Biological Systems and Engineering Division Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Berkeley CA USA. Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute and Redwood Center for Theoretical Neuroscience UC Berkeley Berkeley CA USA. RIKEN AIP Tokyo Japan. Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology (RCAST) The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan. School of Computer Science University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia. Texas A&M University College Station TX USA. Cullen College of Engineering University of Houston Houston TX USA. Graduate Institute of Biomedical Engineering National Taiwan University of Science and Technology Taipei Taiwan. National Centre for Computer Animation Bournemouth University Poole UK. PROPHESEE Paris France. Department of Neuroscience Columbia University New York NY USA. Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute Columbia University New York NY USA. Department of Computer Science Northern Illinois Universit

BigNeuron is an open community bench-testing platform with the goal of setting open standards for accurate and fast automatic neuron tracing. We gathered a diverse set of image volumes across several species that is representative of the data obtained in many neuroscience laboratories interested in neuron tracing. Here, we report generated gold standard manual annotations for a subset of the available imaging datasets and quantified tracing quality for 35 automatic tracing algorithms. The goal of generating such a hand-curated diverse dataset is to advance the development of tracing algorithms and enable generalizable benchmarking. Together with image quality features, we pooled the data in an interactive web application that enables users and developers to perform principal component analysis, t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding, correlation and clustering, visualization of imaging and tracing data, and benchmarking of automatic tracing algorithms in user-defined data subsets. The image quality metrics explain most of the variance in the data, followed by neuromorphological features related to neuron size. We observed that diverse algorithms can provide complementary information to obtain accurate results and developed a method to iteratively combine methods and generate consensus reconstructions. The consensus trees obtained provide estimates of the neuron structure ground truth that typically outperform single algorithms in noisy datasets. However, specific algorithms may outperform the consensus tree strategy in specific imaging conditions. Finally, to aid users in predicting the most accurate automatic tracing results without manual annotations for comparison, we used support vector machine regression to predict reconstruction quality given an image volume and a set of automatic tracings.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Biomedical image analysis competitions: The state of current participation practice

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2022年

作者： Eisenmann, Matthias Reinke, Annika Weru, Vivienn Tizabi, Minu Dietlinde Isensee, Fabian Adler, Tim J. Godau, Patrick Cheplygina, Veronika Kozubek, Michal Maier-Hein, Klaus Jäger, Paul F. Kopp-Schneider, Annette Maier-Hein, Lena Ali, Sharib Gupta, Anubha Kybic, Jan Noble, Alison de Solórzano, Carlos Ortiz Pachade, Samiksha Petitjean, Caroline Sage, Daniel Wei, Donglai Wilden, Elizabeth Alapatt, Deepak Andrearczyk, Vincent Baid, Ujjwal Bakas, Spyridon Balu, Niranjan Bano, Sophia Bawa, Vivek Singh Bernal, Jorge Bodenstedt, Sebastian Casella, Alessandro Choi, Jinwook Commowick, Olivier Daum, Marie Depeursinge, Adrien Dorent, Reuben Egger, Jan Eichhorn, Hannah Engelhardt, Sandy Ganz, Melanie Girard, Gabriel Hansen, Lasse Heinrich, Mattias Heller, Nicholas Hering, Alessa Huaulmé, Arnaud Kim, Hyunjeong Li, Hongwei Bran Landman, Bennett Li, Jianning Ma, Jun Martel, Anne Martín-Isla, Carlos Menze, Bjoern Nwoye, Chinedu Innocent Oreiller, Valentin Padoy, Nicolas Pati, Sarthak Payette, Kelly Sudre, Carole van Wijnen, Kimberlin Vardazaryan, Armine Vercauteren, Tom Wagner, Martin Wang, Chuanbo Yap, Moi Hoon Yu, Zeyun Yuan, Chun Zenk, Maximilian Zia, Aneeq Zimmerer, David Bao, Rina Choi, Chanyeol Cohen, Andrew Dzyubachyk, Oleh Galdran, Adrian Gan, Tianyuan Guo, Tianqi Gupta, Pradyumna Haithami, Mahmood Ho, Edward Jang, Ikbeom Li, Zhili Luo, Zhengbo Lux, Filip Makrogiannis, Sokratis Müller, Dominik Oh, Young-Tack Pang, Subeen Pape, Constantin Polat, Gorkem Reed, Charlotte Rosalie Ryu, Kanghyun Scherr, Tim Thambawita, Vajira Wang, Haoyu Wang, Xinliang Xu, Kele Yeh, Hung Yeo, Doyeob Yuan, Yixuan Zeng, Yan Zhao, Xin Abbing, Julian Adam, Jannes Adluru, Nagesh Agethen, Niklas Ahmed, Salman Al Khalil, Yasmina Alenyà, Mireia Alhoniemi, Esa An, Chengyang Arega, Tewodros Weldebirhan Avisdris, Netanell Aydogan, Dogu Baran Bai, Yingbin Calisto, Maria Baldeon Basaran, Berke Doga Beetz, Marcel Bian, Hao Blansit, Kevin Bloch, Louise Bohnsack, Robert Bosticardo, Sara Breen, Jack Brudfors, Mikael Brüngel, Raphael Cabezas, Mariano Cacciola, Alb Heidelberg Division of Intelligent Medical Systems Germany Heidelberg HI Helmholtz Imaging Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Heidelberg Division of Biostatistics Germany Heidelberg Division of Medical Image Computing Germany Heidelberg HI Applied Vision Lab Germany IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic Heidelberg Interactive Machine Learning Group Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science and Medical Faculty Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany NCT Heidelberg DKFZ University Hospital Heidelberg Germany School of Computing University of Leeds Leeds United Kingdom SBILab Department of ECE IIIT-Delhi India Faculty of Electrical Engineering Czech Technical University Prague Czech Republic Institute of Biomedical Engineering University of Oxford United Kingdom Center for Applied Medical Research Pamplona Spain Shri Guru Gobind Singhji Institute of Engineering and Technology Maharashtra Nanded India Université de Rouen Normandie France Lausanne Switzerland School of Engineering and Applied Science Harvard University United States ICube University of Strasbourg CNRS France Institute of Informatics School of Management HES-SO Valais-Wallis University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland Techno-Pôle 3 Sierre3960 Switzerland Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Lausanne University Hospital Rue du Bugnon 46 LausanneCH-1011 Switzerland University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology University of Washington United States Wellcome EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences University College London London United Kingdom Visual Artificial Intelligence Lab Oxford Brookes University Oxford United Kingdom Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona & Computer Vision Center Spain Dresden Fetscherstraße 74 PF 64 Dresden01307 Germany

The number of international benchmarking competitions is steadily increasing in various fields of machine learning (ML) research and practice. So far, however, little is known about the common practice as well as bottlenecks faced by the community in tackling the research questions posed. To shed light on the status quo of algorithm development in the specific field of biomedical imaging analysis, we designed an international survey that was issued to all participants of challenges conducted in conjunction with the IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021 conferences (80 competitions in total). The survey covered participants' expertise and working environments, their chosen strategies, as well as algorithm characteristics. A median of 72% challenge participants took part in the survey. According to our results, knowledge exchange was the primary incentive (70%) for participation, while the reception of prize money played only a minor role (16%). While a median of 80 working hours was spent on method development, a large portion of participants stated that they did not have enough time for method development (32%). 25% perceived the infrastructure to be a bottleneck. Overall, 94% of all solutions were deep learning-based. Of these, 84% were based on standard architectures. 43% of the respondents reported that the data samples (e.g., images) were too large to be processed at once. This was most commonly addressed by patch-based training (69%), downsampling (37%), and solving 3D analysis tasks as a series of 2D tasks. K-fold cross-validation on the training set was performed by only 37% of the participants and only 50% of the participants performed ensembling based on multiple identical models (61%) or heterogeneous models (39%). 48% of the respondents applied postprocessing steps. © 2022, CC BY.

关键词： Benchmarking

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Sustainable computational science: The Rescience initiative

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2017年

作者： Rougier, Nicolas P. Hinsen, Konrad Alexandre, Frédéric Arildsen, Thomas Barba, Lorena Benureau, Fabien C.Y. Titus Brown, C. de Buyl, Pierre Caglayan, Ozan Davison, Andrew P. Delsuc, Marc André Detorakis, Georgios Diem, Alexandra K. Drix, Damien Enel, Pierre Girard, Benoît Guest, Olivia Hall, Matt G. Henriques, Rafael Neto Hinaut, Xavier Jaron, Kamil S. Khamassi, Mehdi Klein, Almar Manninen, Tiina Marchesi, Pietro McGlinn, Dan Metzner, Christoph Petchey, Owen L. Plesser, Hans Ekkehard Poisot, Timothée Ram, Karthik Ram, Yoav Roesch, Etienne Rossant, Cyrille Rostami, Vahid Shifman, Aaron Stimberg, Marcel Stachelek, Joseph Stollmeier, Frank Vaggi, Federico Viejo, Guillaume Vitay, Julien Vostinar, Anya Yurchak, Roman Zito, Tiziano INRIA Bordeaux Sud-Ouest Talence France Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives Université de Bordeaux CNRS UMR 5293 Bordeaux France LaBRI Université de Bordeaux Bordeaux INP CNRS UMR 5800 Talence France Centre de Biophysique Moléculaire CNRS UPR4301 Orléans France Synchrotron SOLEIL Division Expériences Gif sur Yvette France Department of Electronic Systems Technical Faculty of IT and Design Aalborg University Denmark Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering George Washington University WashingtonDC United States Department of Population Health and Reproduction University of California Davis DavisCA United States Instituut voor Theoretische Fysica KU Leuven Belgium Le Mans France Unité de Neurosciences Information et Complexité CNRS FRE 3693 Gif sur Yvette France Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire INSERM U964 CNRS UMR 7104 Université de Strasbourg Illkirch France Department of Cognitive Sciences University of California Irvine United States Computational Engineering and Design Faculty of Engineering and the Environment University of Southampton United Kingdom Department of Computer Science Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Friedman Brain Institute Icahn School of Medicine Mount SinaiNY United States Institut des Systèmes Intelligent et de Robotique Sorbonne Universités UPMC Univ Paris 06 CNRS Paris France Experimental Psychology University College London United Kingdom UCL Great Ormond St Institute of Child Health University College London London United Kingdom MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit Cambridge United Kingdom Department of Ecology and Evolution University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland Independent scholar Enschede Netherlands BioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering Tampere University of Technology Tampere Finland Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences Center for Neuroscience Faculty of Science University of Amsterdam Amsterdam Netherlands Depart

computer science offers a large set of tools for prototyping, writing, running, testing, validating, sharing and reproducing results, however computational science lags behind. In the best case, authors may provide their source code as a compressed archive and they may feel confident their research is reproducible. But this is not exactly true. Jonathan Buckheit and David Donoho proposed more than two decades ago that an article about computational results is advertising, not scholarship. The actual scholarship is the full software environment, code, and data that produced the result. This implies new workflows, in particular in peer-reviews. Existing journals have been slow to adapt: source codes are rarely requested, hardly ever actually executed to check that they produce the results advertised in the article. Rescience is a peer-reviewed journal that targets computational research and encourages the explicit replication of already published research, promoting new and open-source implementations in order to ensure that the original research can be replicated from its description. To achieve this goal, the whole publishing chain is radically different from other traditional scientific journals. Rescience resides on GitHub where each new implementation of a computational study is made available together with comments, explanations, and software tests. Copyright © 2017, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Open source software

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

A Robust Ensemble Algorithm for Ischemic Stroke Lesion Segmentation: Generalizability and Clinical Utility Beyond the ISLES Challenge

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2024年

作者： de la Rosa, Ezequiel Reyes, Mauricio Liew, Sook-Lei Hutton, Alexandre Wiest, Roland Kaesmacher, Johannes Hanning, Uta Hakim, Arsany Zubal, Richard Valenzuela, Waldo Robben, David Sima, Diana M. Anania, Vincenzo Brys, Arne Meakin, James A. Mickan, Anne Broocks, Gabriel Heitkamp, Christian Gao, Shengbo Liang, Kongming Zhang, Ziji Siddiquee, Md Mahfuzur Rahman Myronenko, Andriy Ashtari, Pooya Van Huffel, Sabine Jeong, Hyun-Su Yoon, Chi-Ho Kim, Chulhong Huo, Jiayu Ourselin, Sebastien Sparks, Rachel Clèrigues, Albert Oliver, Arnau Lladó, Xavier Chalcroft, Liam Pappas, Ioannis Bertels, Jeroen Heylen, Ewout Moreau, Juliette Hatami, Nima Frindel, Carole Qayyum, Abdul Mazher, Moona Puig, Domenec Lin, Shao-Chieh Juan, Chun-Jung Hu, Tianxi Boone, Lyndon Goubran, Maged Liu, Yi-Jui Wegener, Susanne Kofler, Florian Ezhov, Ivan Shit, Suprosanna Hernandez Petzsche, Moritz R. Menze, Bjoern Kirschke, Jan S. Wiestler, Benedikt Department of Quantitative Biomedicine University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland Department of Informatics Technical University Munich Germany Icometrix Leuven Belgium ARTORG Center for Biomedical Research University of Bern Bern Switzerland Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Bern University of Bern Switzerland University of Bern Bern Switzerland Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy University of Southern California Los AngelesCA United States Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute Department of Neurology Keck School of Medicine University of Southern California United States University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology Inselspital Bern Switzerland University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology University Hospital Bern Inselspital University of Bern Bern Switzerland Department of Diagnostic and Interventional neuroradiology University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Hamburg Germany Department of Medical Imaging Radboud University Medical Center Institute for Health Sciences Nijmegen Netherlands Deepwise AI Lab Beijing China Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications Bejing China School of Computing and Augmented Intelligence Arizona State University TempeAZ United States NVIDIA Santa ClaraCA United States STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems Signal Processing and Data Analytics KU Leuven Leuven Belgium Pohang Korea Republic of School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences King’s College London United Kingdom Institute of Computer Vision and Robotics University of Girona Spain Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging University College London London United Kingdom Laboratory of Neuro Imaging Stevens Institute for Neuroimaging and Informatics Keck School of Medicine University of Southern California Los Angeles United States KU Leuven Leuven Belgium CREATIS Université Lyon1 CNRS UMR5220 INSERM U1206 INSA-Lyon Villeurbanne696

Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) is essential for stroke diagnosis, treatment decisions, and prognosis. However, image and disease variability hinder the development of generalizable AI algorithms with clinical value. We address this gap by presenting a novel ensemble algorithm derived from the 2022 Ischemic Stroke Lesion Segmentation (ISLES) challenge. ISLES’22 provided 400 patient scans with ischemic stroke from various medical centers, facilitating the development of a wide range of cutting-edge segmentation algorithms by the research community. By assessing them against a hidden test set, we identified strengths, weaknesses, and potential biases. Through collaboration with leading teams, we combined top-performing algorithms into an ensemble model that overcomes the limitations of individual solutions. Our ensemble model combines the individual algorithms’ strengths and achieved superior ischemic lesion detection and segmentation accuracy (median Dice score: 0.82, median lesion-wise F1 score: 0.86) on our internal test set compared to individual algorithms. This accuracy generalized well across diverse image and disease variables. Furthermore, the model excelled in extracting clinical biomarkers like lesion types and affected vascular territories. Notably, in a Turing-like test, neuroradiologists consistently preferred the algorithm’s segmentations over manual expert efforts, highlighting increased comprehensiveness and precision. Validation using a real-world external dataset (N=1686) confirmed the model’s generalizability (median Dice score: 0.82, median lesion-wise F1 score: 0.86). The algorithm’s outputs also demonstrated strong correlations with clinical scores (admission NIHSS and 90-day mRS) on par with or exceeding expert-derived results, underlining its clinical relevance. This study offers two key findings. First, we present an ensemble algorithm that detects and segments ischemic stroke lesions on DWI across diverse scenarios on par with expert (neuro)rad

关键词： Diagnosis

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Correction to: Integrating Social Assistive Robots, IoT, Virtual Communities and Smart Objects to Assist at-Home Independently Living Elders: the MoveCare Project

引用

International Journal of Social robotics 2022年第9期14卷 2045-2045页

作者： Luperto, Matteo Monroy, Javier Renoux, Jennifer Lunardini, Francesca Basilico, Nicola Bulgheroni, Maria Cangelosi, Angelo Cesari, Matteo Cid, Manuel Ianes, Aladar Gonzalez-Jimenez, Javier Kounoudes, Anastasis Mari, David Prisacariu, Victor Savanovic, Arso Ferrante, Simona Borghese, N. Alberto Applied Intelligent System Lab Department of Computer Science University of Milan Milano Italy Machine Perception and Intelligent Robotics Group (MAPIR) Department of System Engineering and Automation University of Malaga and Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga–IBIMA Malaga Spain Machine Perception and Interaction Lab Örebro University Örebro Sweden NearLab Department of Electronics Information and Bioengineering Politecnico di Milano Milano Italy AB.Acus SRL Milan Italy University of Manchester Manchester UK IRCCS Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri University of Milan Milan Italy Junta de Extremadura Merida Spain Korian Milan Italy SignalGeneriX Limassol Cyprus EURECAT Barcelona Spain University of Oxford Oxford UK Smart Com Ljubjana Slovenia

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

PB 13 Errors elicit high-gamma responses in the human cerebral cortex

引用

Clinical Neurophysiology 2017年第10期128卷 e320-e320页

作者： M. Völker S. Berberich L.D.J. Fiederer J. Hammer P. Kršek M. Tomášek P. Marusic P.C. Reinacher V.A. Coenen A. Schulze-Bonhage W. Burgard T. Ball University Medical Center Freiburg iEEG and Brain Imaging Group Freiburg Germany University of Freiburg Graduate School of Robotics Freiburg Germany University of Freiburg Department of Computer Science Freiburg Germany University of Freiburg BrainLinks-BrainTools Freiburg Germany University of Freiburg Faculty of Medicine Freiburg Germany University of Freiburg Faculty of Biology Freiburg Germany Motol University Hospital Department of Neurology Prague Czech Republic University Medical Center Freiburg Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery Freiburg Germany University Medical Center Epilepsy Center Freiburg Germany University of Freiburg Autonomous Intelligent Systems Freiburg Germany

The nature of human error processing and the underlying cerebral mechanisms are of great interest in neuroscience, and error-related brain responses may provide information useful to improve the accuracy of brain-machine interfaces (BMIs). So far, many studies focused on error-related responses below 30 Hz. We were interested in error-related effects in the high-gamma band (HGB, 50–150 Hz), as this frequency range is thought to reflect local cortical information processing more directly than lower frequencies. 30 healthy subjects performed a flanker task as classically used to study error processing ( Gehring et al., 1993 ). Under time pressure, the subjects had to use the left or right index finger to respond to the respective flanker. Recordings of 128-channel EEG were acquired within an optimized setting for non-invasive EEG high-gamma mapping in an electromagnetically shielded cabin with full optical decoupling of all devices and high-resolution binocular eye tracking. Additionally, 9 patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy and implanted stereo-EEG (SEEG) electrodes performed the identical task. As our main result, we show for the first time error-related HGB spectral power modulations up to 120 Hz in non-invasive EEG ( Fig. 1 A), which could also be used for decoding on a single-trial basis. Additional SEEG data ( Fig. 1 B) revealed possible sources of these effects, including the premotor cortex. Additional responses were seen in areas not reflected in the non-invasive EEG, such as hippocampus and insula. Importantly, based on the eye-tracking data, we show that the error-related effects in the gamma range cannot be explained by differences in eye movements including micro-saccades, which had a different spatial distribution compared to the error-related effects. Our findings open a new window for investigation of the complex neuronal processes related to error perception and ensuing behavioral adaptation. The similarity of intracranial and non-invasive

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Heidelberg colorectal data set for surgical data science in the sensor operating room

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2020年

作者： Maier-Hein, Lena Wagner, Martin Ross, Tobias Reinke, Annika Bodenstedt, Sebastian Full, Peter M. Hempe, Hellena Mindroc-Filimon, Diana Scholz, Patrick Tran, Thuy Nuong Bruno, Pierangela Kisilenko, Anna Müller, Benjamin Davitashvili, Tornike Capek, Manuela Tizabi, Minu Eisenmann, Matthias Adler, Tim J. Gröhl, Janek Schellenberg, Melanie Seidlitz, Silvia Lai, T.Y. Emmy Pekdemir, Bünyamin Roethlingshoefer, Veith Both, Fabian Bittel, Sebastian Mengler, Marc Mündermann, Lars Apitz, Martin Kopp-Schneider, Annette Speidel, Stefanie Kenngott, Hannes G. Müller-Stich, Beat P. Im Neuenheimer Feld 223 Heidelberg69120 Germany Department for General Visceral and Transplantation Surgery Heidelberg University Hospital Im Neuenheimer Feld 110 Heidelberg69120 Germany University of Heidelberg Seminarstraße 2 Heidelberg69117 Germany Division of Translational Surgical Oncology National Center for Tumor Diseases Partner Site Dresden Fetscherstraße 74 Dresden01307 Germany Im Neuenheimer Feld 223 Heidelberg69120 Germany HIDSS4Health - Helmholtz Information and Data Science School for Health Im Neuenheimer Feld 223 Heidelberg69120 Germany Department of Mathematics and Computer Science University of Calabria Via Pietro Bucci Arcavacata Rende CS87036 Italy understandAI GmbH An der RaumFabrik 34 Karlsruhe76227 Germany International Max Planck Research School for Intelligent Systems Tübingen University of Tübingen Geschwister-Scholl-Platz Tübingen72074 Germany BMW Group Heidemannstraße 164 Munich80939 Germany Corporate Research and Technology Data-Assisted Solutions KARL STORZ SE & Co. KG Dr.-Karl-Storz-Strasse 34 Tuttlingen78532 Germany Im Neuenheimer Feld 581 Heidelberg69120 Germany TU Dresden Dresden01307 Germany

Image-based tracking of medical instruments is an integral part of surgical data science applications. Previous research has addressed the tasks of detecting, segmenting and tracking medical instruments based on laparoscopic video data. However, the proposed methods still tend to fail when applied to challenging images and do not generalize well to data they have not been trained on. This paper introduces the Heidelberg Colorectal (HeiCo) data set - the first publicly available data set enabling comprehensive benchmarking of medical instrument detection and segmentation algorithms with a specific emphasis on method robustness and generalization capabilities. Our data set comprises 30 laparoscopic videos and corresponding sensor data from medical devices in the operating room for three different types of laparoscopic surgery. Annotations include surgical phase labels for all video frames as well as information on instrument presence and corresponding instance-wise segmentation masks for surgical instruments (if any) in more than 10,000 individual frames. The data has successfully been used to organize international competitions within the Endoscopic vision Challenges 2017 and 2019. Copyright © 2020, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Laparoscopy

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

PitVis-2023 Challenge: Workflow Recognition in videos of Endoscopic Pituitary Surgery

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2024年

作者： Das, Adrito Khan, Danyal Z. Psychogyios, Dimitrios Zhang, Yitong Hanrahan, John G. Vasconcelos, Francisco Pang, You Chen, Zhen Wu, Jinlin Zou, Xiaoyang Zheng, Guoyan Qayyum, Abdul Mazher, Moona Razzak, Imran Li, Tianbin Ye, Jin He, Junjun Plotka, Szymon Kaleta, Joanna Yamlahi, Amine Jund, Antoine Godau, Patrick Kondo, Satoshi Kasai, Satoshi Hirasawa, Kousuke Rivoir, Dominik Pérez, Alejandra Rodriguez, Santiago Arbeláez, Pablo Stoyanov, Danail Marcus, Hani J. Bano, Sophia Wellcome EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences University College London London United Kingdom Department of Neurosurgery National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery London United Kingdom HKISI CAS China Institute of Medical Robotics School of Biomedical Engineering Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai China National Heart and Lung Institute Faculty of Medicine Imperial College London United Kingdom Centre for Medical Image Computing University College London London United Kingdom University of New South Wales Sydney Australia Shanghai AI Lab Shanghai China Informatics Institute University of Amsterdam Amsterdam Netherlands Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics Amsterdam University Medical Center University of Amsterdam Amsterdam Netherlands Sano Center for Computational Medicine Krakow Poland Heidelberg Division of Intelligent Medical Systems Germany NCT Heidelberg a partnership between DKFZ University Hospital Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Muroran Institute of Technology Hokkaido Japan Niigata University of Health and Welfare Niigata Japan Konica Minolta Inc. Osaka Japan National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden Germany Centre for Tactile Internet TUD Dresden Germany Universidad de los Andes Bogota Colombia DKFZ UKDD TUD Germany

The field of computer vision applied to videos of minimally invasive surgery is ever-growing. Workflow recognition pertains to the automated recognition of various aspects of a surgery: including which surgical steps are performed;and which surgical instruments are used. This information can later be used to assist clinicians when learning the surgery;during live surgery;and when writing operation notes. The Pituitary vision (PitVis) 2023 Challenge tasks the community to step and instrument recognition in videos of endoscopic pituitary surgery. This is a unique task when compared to other minimally invasive surgeries due to the smaller working space, which limits and distorts vision;and higher frequency of instrument and step switching, which requires more precise model predictions. Participants were provided with 25-videos, with results presented at the MICCAI-2023 conference as part of the Endoscopic vision 2023 Challenge in Vancouver, Canada, on 08-Oct-2023. There were 18-submissions from 9-teams across 6-countries, using a variety of deep learning models. A commonality between the top performing models was incorporating spatio-temporal and multi-task methods, with greater than 50% and 10% macro-F1-score improvement over purely spacial single-task models in step and instrument recognition respectively. The PitVis-2023 Challenge therefore demonstrates state-of-the-art computer vision models in minimally invasive surgery are transferable to a new dataset, with surgery specific techniques used to enhance performance, progressing the field further. Benchmark results are provided in the paper, and the dataset is publicly available at: https://***/10.5522/04/26531686. Copyright © 2024, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Endoscopy

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Comparative validation of machine learning algorithms for surgical workflow and skill analysis with the heichole benchmark

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2021年

作者： Wagner, Martin Müller-Stich, Beat-Peter Kisilenko, Anna Tran, Duc Heger, Patrick Mündermann, Lars Lubotsky, David M. Müller, Benjamin Davitashvili, Tornike Capek, Manuela Reinke, Annika Yu, Tong Vardazaryan, Armine Innocent Nwoye, Chinedu Padoy, Nicolas Liu, Xinyang Lee, Eung-Joo Disch, Constantin Meine, Hans Xia, Tong Jia, Fucang Kondo, Satoshi Reiter, Wolfgang Jin, Yueming Long, Yonghao Jiang, Meirui Dou, Qi Heng, Pheng Ann Twick, Isabell Kirtac, Kadir Hosgor, Enes Bolmgren, Jon Lindström Stenzel, Michael von Siemens, Björn Kenngott, Hannes G. Nickel, Felix von Frankenberg, Moritz Mathis-Ullrich, Franziska Maier-Hein, Lena Speidel, Stefanie Bodenstedt, Sebastian Department for General Visceral and Transplantation Surgery Heidelberg University Hospital Im Neuenheimer Feld 420 Heidelberg69120 Germany Heidelberg Im Neuenheimer Feld 460 Heidelberg69120 Germany Data Assisted Solutions Corporate Research & Technology KARL STORZ SE & Co. KG Dr. Karl-Storz-Str. 34 Tuttlingen78332 Germany Im Neuenheimer Feld 223 Heidelberg69120 Germany Im Neuenheimer Feld 223 Heidelberg69120 Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Im Neuenheimer Feld 205 Heidelberg69120 Germany ICube University of Strasbourg CNRS France 300 bd Sébastien Brant - CS 10413 Illkirch CedexF-67412 France IHU Strasbourg France 1 Place de l'hôpital Strasbourg67000 France Sheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation Children's National Hospital 111 Michigan Ave NW WashingtonDC20010 United States University of Maryland College Park 2405 A V Williams Building College ParkMD20742 United States Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS Max-von-Laue-Str. 2 Bremen28359 Germany University of Bremen FB3 Medical Image Computing Group ℅ Fraunhofer MEVIS Am Fallturm 1 Bremen28359 Germany Lab for Medical Imaging and Digital Surgery Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology Chinese Academy of Sciences Shenzhen518055 China Konika Minolta Inc. JP TOWER 2-7-2 Marunouchi Chiyoda-ku Tokyo100-7015 Japan Wintegral GmbH Ehrenbreitsteiner Str. 36 München80993 Germany Department of Computer Science and Engineering Ho Sin-Hang Engineering Building The Chinese University of Hong Kong Sha Tin NT Hong Kong Caresyntax GmbH Komturstr. 18A Berlin12099 Germany Department of Surgery Salem Hospital of the Evangelische Stadtmission Heidelberg Zeppelinstrasse 11-33 Heidelberg69121 Germany Health Robotics and Automation Laboratory Institute for Anthropomatics and Robotics Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Geb. 40.28 KIT Campus Süd Engler-Bunte-Ring 8 Karlsruhe76131 Germany Medical Faculty Heidelberg Uni

PURPOSE: Surgical workflow and skill analysis are key technologies for the next generation of cognitive surgical assistance systems. These systems could increase the safety of the operation through context-sensitive warnings and semi-autonomous robotic assistance or improve training of surgeons via data-driven feedback. In surgical workflow analysis up to 91% average precision has been reported for phase recognition on an open data single-center video dataset. In this work we investigated the generalizability of phase recognition algorithms in a multi-center setting including more difficult recognition tasks such as surgical action and surgical skill. METHODS: To achieve this goal, a dataset with 33 laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos from three surgical centers with a total operation time of 22 hours was created. Labels included framewise annotation of seven surgical phases with 250 phase transitions, 5514 occurences of four surgical actions, 6980 occurences of 21 surgical instruments from seven instrument categories and 495 skill classifications in five skill dimensions. The dataset was used in the 2019 international Endoscopic vision challenge, sub-challenge for surgical workflow and skill analysis. Here, 12 research teams trained and submitted their machine learning algorithms for recognition of phase, action, instrument and/or skill assessment. RESULTS: F1-scores were achieved for phase recognition between 23.9% and 67.7% (n=9 teams), for instrument presence detection between 38.5% and 63.8% (n=8 teams), but for action recognition only between 21.8% and 23.3% (n=5 teams). The average absolute error for skill assessment was 0.78 (n=1 team). CONCLUSION: Surgical workflow and skill analysis are promising technologies to support the surgical team, but are not solved yet, as shown by our comparison of machine learning algorithms. This novel HeiChole benchmark can be used for comparable evaluation and validation of future work. In future studies, it is of utmost impo

关键词： Learning algorithms

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：