检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

arXiv 2024年

作者： Wang, Meng Lin, Tian Lin, Aidi Yu, Kai Peng, Yuanyuan Wang, Lianyu Chen, Cheng Zou, Ke Liang, Huiyu Chen, Man Yao, Xue Zhang, Meiqin Huang, Binwei Zheng, Chaoxin Zhang, Peixin Chen, Wei Luo, Yilong Chen, Yifan Xia, Honghe Shi, Tingkun Zhang, Qi Guo, Jinming Chen, Xiaolin Wang, Jingcheng Chung Tham, Yih Liu, Dianbo Wong, Wendy Thakur, Sahil Fenner, Beau Fang, Danqi Liu, Siying Liu, Qingyun Huang, Yuqiang Zeng, Hongqiang Meng, Yanda Zhou, Yukun Jiang, Zehua Qiu, Minghui Zhang, Changqing Chen, Xinjian Wang, Sophia Y. Lee, Cecilia S. Sobrin, Lucia Cheung, Carol Y. Pang, Chi Pui Keane, Pearse A. Cheng, Ching-Yu Chen, Haoyu Fu, Huazhu Centre for Innovation & Precision Eye Health Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine National University of Singapore Singapore117549 Singapore Department of Ophthalmology Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine National University of Singapore Singapore117549 Singapore Joint Shantou International Eye Center Shantou University Chinese University of Hong Kong Guangdong Shantou515041 China Department of Radiology University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA19104 United States School of Biomedical Engineering Anhui Medical University Anhui Hefei230032 China College of Computer Science and Technology Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Jiangsu Nanjing211100 China Center of Advanced Medical Computing and Analysis Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School BostonMA02114 United States National Key Laboratory of Fundamental Science on Synthetic Vision College of Computer Science Sichuan University Sichuan Chengdu610065 China Big Vision Medical Technology Ltd. Suzhou China Singapore Eye Research Institute Singapore National Eye Centre Singapore Duke-NUS Medical School Singapore Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences The Chinese University of Hong Kong 999077 Hong Kong Shenzhen Longgang E.N.T Hospital Guangdong Shenzhen518172 China Dongguan Songshan Lake Central Hospital Guangdong Dongguan523326 China Department of Computer Science University of Exeter ExeterEX4 4RN United Kingdom Centre for Medical Image Computing University College London London United Kingdom NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust London United Kingdom Institute of Ophthalmology University College London London United Kingdom Tsinghua Medicine of Tsinghua University Beijing100084 China School of Clinical Medicine Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital Beijing102218 China Foshan Aier Eye Hospital Guangdong Foshan528000 China College of Intelligence and Computing Tianjin University Tianjin300350 China School of Electr

Previous foundation models for retinal images were pre-trained with limited disease categories and knowledge base. Here we introduce RetiZero, a vision-language foundation model that leverages knowledge from over 400 fundus diseases. For RetiZero's pre-training, we compiled 341,896 fundus images paired with text descriptions, sourced from public datasets, ophthalmic literature, and online resources, encompassing a diverse range of diseases across multiple ethnicities and countries. RetiZero exhibits superior performance in several downstream tasks, including zero-shot disease recognition, image-to-image retrieval, and internal- and cross-domain disease identification. In zero-shot scenarios, RetiZero achieves Top5 accuracy scores of 0.8430 for 15 fundus diseases and 0.7561 for 52 fundus diseases. For image retrieval, it achieves Top5 scores of 0.9500 and 0.8860 for the same disease sets, respectively. Clinical evaluations show that RetiZero's Top3 zero-shot performance surpasses the average of 19 ophthalmologists from Singapore, China, and the United States. Furthermore, RetiZero significantly enhances clinicians' accuracy in diagnosing fundus disease. These findings underscore the value of integrating the RetiZero foundation model into clinical settings, where a variety of fundus diseases are encountered. © 2024, CC0.

关键词： Ophthalmology

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Considerations and recommendations from the ISMRM Diffusion Study Group for preclinical diffusion MRI: Part 2 — Ex vivo imaging: added value and acquisition

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2022年

作者： Schilling, Kurt G. Grussu, Francesco Ianus, Andrada Hansen, Brian Howard, Amy F.D. Barrett, Rachel L.C. Aggarwal, Manisha Michielse, Stijn Nasrallah, Fatima Syeda, Warda Wang, Nian Veraart, Jelle Roebroeck, Alard Bagdasarian, Andrew F. Eichner, Cornelius Sepehrband, Farshid Zimmermann, Jan Soustelle, Lucas Bowman, Christien Tendler, Benjamin C. Hertanu, Andreea Jeurissen, Ben Verhoye, Marleen Frydman, Lucio de Looij, Yohan van Hike, David Dunn, Jeff F. Miller, Karla Landman, Bennett A. Shemesh, Noam Anderson, Adam McKinnon, Emilie Farquharson, Shawna Acqua, Flavio Dell Pierpaoli, Carlo Drobnjak, Ivana Leemans, Alexander Harkins, Kevin D. Descoteaux, Maxime Xu, Duan Huang, Hao Santin, Mathieu D. Grant, Samuel C. Obenaus, Andre Kim, Gene S. Wu, Dan Le Bihan, Denis Blackband, Stephen J. Ciobanu, Luisa Fieremans, Els Bai, Ruiliang Leergaard, Trygve B. Zhang, Jiangyang Dyrby, Tim B. Allan Johnson, G. Cohen-Adad, Julien Budde, Matthew D. Jelescu, Ileana O. Radiology and Radiological Sciences Vanderbilt University Medical Center NashvilleTN United States Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science Vanderbilt University NashvilleTN United States Radiomics Group Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus Barcelona Spain Queen Square MS Centre Queen Square Institute of Neurology Faculty of Brain Sciences University College London London United Kingdom Champalimaud Research Champalimaud Foundation Lisbon Portugal Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark Department of Bioengineering Imperial College London London United Kingdom FMRIB Centre Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom Department of Neuroimaging Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London United Kingdom NatBrainLab Department of Forensics and Neurodevelopmental Sciences Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London United Kingdom Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine BaltimoreMD United States Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht Netherlands The Queensland Brain Institute The University of Queensland Queensland Australia Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre The University of Melbourne ParkvilleVIC Australia Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences Indiana University IN United States Stark Neurosciences Research Institute Indiana University School of Medicine IN United States Center for Biomedical Imaging NYU Grossman School of Medicine New YorkNY United States Faculty of psychology and Neuroscience Maastricht University Maastricht Netherlands Department of Chemical & Biomedical Engineering FAMU-FSU College of Engineering Florida State University TallahasseeFL United States Center for Interdisciplinary Magnetic Re

The value of preclinical diffusion MRI (dMRI) is substantial. While dMRI enables in vivo non-invasive characterization of tissue, ex vivo dMRI is increasingly being used to probe tissue microstructure and brain connectivity. Ex vivo dMRI has several experimental advantages including higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and spatial resolution compared to in vivo studies, and enabling more advanced diffusion contrasts for improved microstructure and connectivity characterization. Another major advantage of ex vivo dMRI is the direct comparison with histological data, as a crucial methodological validation. However, there are a number of considerations that must be made when performing ex vivo experiments. The steps from tissue preparation, image acquisition and processing, and interpretation of results are complex, with many decisions that not only differ dramatically from in vivo imaging of small animals, but ultimately affect what questions can be answered using the data. This work represents "Part 2" of a 3-part series of recommendations and considerations for preclinical dMRI. We describe best practices for dMRI of ex vivo tissue, with a focus on the value that ex vivo imaging adds to the field of dMRI and considerations in ex vivo image acquisition. We first give general considerations and foundational knowledge that must be considered when designing experiments. We briefly describe differences in specimens and models and discuss why some may be more or less appropriate for different studies. We then give guidelines for ex vivo protocols, including tissue fixation, sample preparation, and MR scanning. In each section, we attempt to provide guidelines and recommendations, but also highlight areas for which no guidelines exist (and why), and where future work should lie. An overarching goal herein is to enhance the rigor and reproducibility of ex vivo dMRI acquisitions and analyses, and thereby advance biomedical knowledge. © 2022, CC BY.

关键词： image acquisition

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Considerations and Recommendations from the ISMRM Diffusion Study Group for preclinical diffusion MRI: Part 1 — In vivo small-animal imaging

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2022年

作者： Jelescu, Ileana O. Grussu, Francesco Ianus, Andrada Hansen, Brian Barrett, Rachel L.C. Aggarwal, Manisha Michielse, Stijn Nasrallah, Fatima Syeda, Warda Wang, Nian Veraart, Jelle Roebroeck, Alard Bagdasarian, Andrew F. Eichner, Cornelius Sepehrband, Farshid Zimmermann, Jan Soustelle, Lucas Bowman, Christien Tendler, Benjamin C. Hertanu, Andreea Jeurissen, Ben Verhoye, Marleen Frydman, Lucio de Looij, Yohan van Hike, David Dunn, Jeff F. Miller, Karla Landman, Bennett A. Shemesh, Noam Anderson, Adam McKinnon, Emilie Farquharson, Shawna Acqua, Flavio Dell Pierpaoli, Carlo Drobnjak, Ivana Leemans, Alexander Harkins, Kevin D. Descoteaux, Maxime Xu, Duan Huang, Hao Santin, Mathieu D. Grant, Samuel C. Obenaus, Andre Kim, Gene S. Wu, Dan Le Bihan, Denis Blackband, Stephen J. Ciobanu, Luisa Fieremans, Els Bai, Ruiliang Leergaard, Trygve B. Zhang, Jiangyang Dyrby, Tim B. Johnson, G. Allan Cohen-Adad, Julien Budde, Matthew D. Schilling, Kurt G. Department of Radiology Lausanne University Hospital University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland Radiomics Group Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus Barcelona Spain Queen Square MS Centre Queen Square Institute of Neurology Faculty of Brain Sciences University College London London United Kingdom Champalimaud Research Champalimaud Foundation Lisbon Portugal Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark Department of Neuroimaging Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London United Kingdom NatBrainLab Department of Forensics and Neurodevelopmental Sciences Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London United Kingdom Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine BaltimoreMD United States Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht Netherlands The Queensland Brain Institute The University of Queensland Queensland Australia Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre The University of Melbourne ParkvilleVIC Australia Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences Indiana University IN United States Stark Neurosciences Research Institute Indiana University School of Medicine IN United States Center for Biomedical Imaging NYU Grossman School of Medicine New YorkNY United States Faculty of psychology and Neuroscience Maastricht University Maastricht Netherlands Department of Chemical & Biomedical Engineering FAMU-FSU College of Engineering Florida State University TallahasseeFL United States Center for Interdisciplinary Magnetic Resonance National HIgh Magnetic Field Laboratory TallahasseeFL United States Department of Neuropsychology Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig Germany USC Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Instit

Small-animal diffusion MRI (dMRI) has been used for methodological development and validation, characterizing the biological basis of diffusion phenomena, and comparative anatomy. The steps from animal setup and monitoring, to acquisition, analysis, and interpretation are complex, with many decisions that may ultimately affect what questions can be answered using the resultant data. This work aims to present selected recommendations and guidelines from the diffusion community, on best practices for preclinical dMRI of in vivo animals. We describe the general considerations and foundational knowledge that must be considered when designing experiments. We briefly describe differences in animal species and disease models and discuss why some may be more or less appropriate for different studies. We then give guidelines for in vivo acquisition protocols, including decisions on hardware, animal preparation, and imaging sequences, followed by advice for data processing including pre-processing, model-fitting, and tractography. Finally, we provide an online resource which lists publicly available preclinical dMRI datasets and software packages, to promote responsible and reproducible research. In each section, we attempt to provide guides and recommendations, but also highlight areas for which no guidelines exist (and why), and where future work should focus. While we mainly cover the central nervous system (on which most preclinical dMRI studies are focused), we also provide, where possible and applicable, recommendations for other organs of interest. An overarching goal herein is to enhance the rigor and reproducibility of small animal dMRI acquisitions and analyses, and thereby advance biomedical knowledge. © 2022, CC BY-NC-ND.

关键词： Invertebrates

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Considerations and recommendations from the ISMRM Diffusion Study Group for preclinical diffusion MRI: Part 3 — Ex vivo imaging: data processing, comparisons with microscopy, and tractography

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2024年

作者： Schilling, Kurt G. Howard, Amy F.D. Grussu, Francesco Ianus, Andrada Hansen, Brian Barrett, Rachel L.C. Aggarwal, Manisha Michielse, Stijn Nasrallah, Fatima Syeda, Warda Wang, Nian Veraart, Jelle Roebroeck, Alard Bagdasarian, Andrew F. Eichner, Cornelius Sepehrband, Farshid Zimmermann, Jan Soustelle, Lucas Bowman, Christien Tendler, Benjamin C. Hertanu, Andreea Jeurissen, Ben Verhoye, Marleen Frydman, Lucio van de Looij, Yohan Hike, David Dunn, Jeff F. Miller, Karla Landman, Bennett A. Shemesh, Noam Anderson, Adam McKinnon, Emilie Farquharson, Shawna Dell' Acqua, Flavio Pierpaoli, Carlo Drobnjak, Ivana Leemans, Alexander Harkins, Kevin D. Descoteaux, Maxime Xu, Duan Huang, Hao Santin, Mathieu D. Grant, Samuel C. Obenaus, Andre Kim, Gene S. Wu, Dan Le Bihan, Denis Blackband, Stephen J. Ciobanu, Luisa Fieremans, Els Bai, Ruiliang Leergaard, Trygve B. Zhang, Jiangyang Dyrby, Tim B. Johnson, G. Allan Cohen-Adad, Julien Budde, Matthew D. Jelescu, Ileana O. Radiology and Radiological Sciences Vanderbilt University Medical Center NashvilleTN United States Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science Vanderbilt University NashvilleTN United States Department of Bioengineering Imperial College London London United Kingdom FMRIB Centre Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom Radiomics Group Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus Barcelona Spain Queen Square MS Centre Queen Square Institute of Neurology Faculty of Brain Sciences University College London London United Kingdom Champalimaud Research Champalimaud Foundation Lisbon Portugal Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark Department of Neuroimaging Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London United Kingdom NatBrainLab Department of Forensics and Neurodevelopmental Sciences Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London United Kingdom Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine BaltimoreMD United States Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht Netherlands The Queensland Brain Institute The University of Queensland Queensland Australia Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre The University of Melbourne ParkvilleVIC Australia Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences Indiana University IN United States Stark Neurosciences Research Institute Indiana University School of Medicine IN United States Center for Biomedical Imaging NYU Grossman School of Medicine New YorkNY United States Faculty of psychology and Neuroscience Maastricht University Maastricht Netherlands Department of Chemical & Biomedical Engineering FAMU-FSU College of Engineering Florida State University TallahasseeFL United States Center for Interdisciplinary Magnetic Res

Preclinical diffusion MRI (dMRI) has proven value in methods development and validation, characterizing the biological basis of diffusion phenomena, and comparative anatomy. While dMRI enables in vivo non-invasive characterization of tissue, ex vivo dMRI is increasingly being used to probe tissue microstructure and brain connectivity. Ex vivo dMRI has several experimental advantages that facilitate high spatial resolution and high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) images, cutting-edge diffusion contrasts, and direct comparison with histological data as a methodological validation. However, there are a number of considerations that must be made when performing ex vivo experiments. The steps from tissue preparation, image acquisition and processing, and interpretation of results are complex, with many decisions that not only differ dramatically from in vivo imaging of small animals, but ultimately affect what questions can be answered using the data. This work concludes a 3-part series of recommendations and considerations for preclinical dMRI. Herein, we describe best practices for dMRI of ex vivo tissue, with a focus on image pre-processing, data processing and model fitting, and tractography. In each section, we attempt to provide guidelines and recommendations, but also highlight areas for which no guidelines exist (and why), and where future work should lie. We end by providing guidelines on code sharing and data sharing, and point towards open-source software and databases specific to small animal and ex vivo imaging. © 2024, CC BY.

关键词： Data Sharing

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：