检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

Erratum to: Helicity amplitude analysis of χcJ → ϕϕ

Journal of High Energy Physics 2024年第12期2024卷 1-5页

作者： Ablikim, M. Achasov, M. N. Adlarson, P. Albrecht, M. Aliberti, R. Amoroso, A. An, M. R. An, Q. Bai, X. H. Bai, Y. Bakina, O. Baldini Ferroli, R. Balossino, I. Ban, Y. Batozskaya, V. Becker, D. Begzsuren, K. Berger, N. Bertani, M. Bettoni, D. Bianchi, F. Bloms, J. Bortone, A. Boyko, I. Briere, R. A. Brueggemann, A. Cai, H. Cai, X. Calcaterra, A. Cao, G. F. Cao, N. Cetin, S. A. Chang, J. F. Chang, W. L. Chelkov, G. Chen, C. Chen, Chao Chen, G. Chen, H. S. Chen, M. L. Chen, S. J. Chen, S. M. Chen, T. Chen, X. R. Chen, X. T. Chen, Y. B. Chen, Z. J. Cheng, W. S. Choi, S. K. Chu, X. Cibinetto, G. Cossio, F. Cui, J. J. Dai, H. L. Dai, J. P. Dbeyssi, A. de Boer, R. E. Dedovich, D. Deng, Z. Y. Denig, A. Denysenko, I. Destefanis, M. De Mori, F. Ding, Y. Dong, J. Dong, L. Y. Dong, M. Y. Dong, X. Du, S. X. Egorov, P. Fan, Y. L. Fang, J. Fang, S. S. Fang, W. X. Fang, Y. Farinelli, R. Fava, L. Feldbauer, F. Felici, G. Feng, C. Q. Feng, J. H. Fischer, K Fritsch, M. Fritzsch, C. Fu, C. D. Gao, H. Gao, Y. N. Gao, Yang Garbolino, S. Garzia, I. Ge, P. T. Ge, Z. W. Geng, C. Gersabeck, E. M. Gilman, A Goetzen, K. Gong, L. Gong, W. X. Gradl, W. Greco, M. Gu, L. M. Gu, M. H. Gu, Y. T. Guan, C. Y Guo, A. Q. Guo, L. B. Guo, R. P. Guo, Y. P. Guskov, A. Han, T. T. Han, W. Y. Hao, X. Q. Harris, F. A. He, K. K. He, K. L. Heinsius, F. H. Heinz, C. H. Heng, Y. K. Herold, C. Himmelreich, M. Hou, G. Y. Hou, Y. R. Hou, Z. L. Hu, H. M. Hu, J. F. Hu, T. Hu, Y. Huang, G. S. Huang, K. X. Huang, L. Q. Huang, X. T. Huang, Y. P. Huang, Z. Hussain, T. Hüsken, N Imoehl, W. Irshad, M. Jackson, J. Jaeger, S. Janchiv, S. Jang, E. Jeong, J. H. Ji, Q. Ji, Q. P. Ji, X. B. Ji, X. L. Ji, Y. Y. Jia, Z. K. Jiang, H. B. Jiang, S. S. Jiang, X. S. Jiang, Y. Jiao, J. B. Jiao, Z. Jin, S. Jin, Y. Jing, M. Q. Johansson, T. Kalantar-Nayestanaki, N. Kang, X. S. Kappert, R. Kavatsyuk, M. Ke, B. C. Keshk, I. K. Khoukaz, A. Kiuchi, R. Kliemt, R. Koch, L. Kolcu, O. B. Kopf, B. Kuemmel, M. Kuessner, M. Kupsc, A. Kühn, W. Lane, J. J. Lange, J. S. Larin, P. Lavania, A. Lavezzi, L. Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing People’s Republic of China G.I. Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS (BINP) Novosibirsk Russia Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden Bochum Ruhr-University Bochum Germany Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz Mainz Germany University of Turin Turin Italy INFN Turin Italy Liaoning Normal University Dalian People’s Republic of China University of Science and Technology of China Hefei People’s Republic of China State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics Beijing People’s Republic of China University of Jinan Jinan People’s Republic of China Southeast University Nanjing People’s Republic of China Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna Russia INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati Frascati Italy INFN Sezione di Ferrara Ferrara Italy Peking University Beijing People’s Republic of China State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology Peking University Beijing People’s Republic of China National Centre for Nuclear Research Warsaw Poland Institute of Physics and Technology Ulaanbaatar Mongolia University of Muenster Muenster Germany Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh U.S.A. Wuhan University Wuhan People’s Republic of China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing People’s Republic of China Turkish Accelerator Center Particle Factory Group Istinye University Istanbul Turkey Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology Moscow Russia Nankai University Tianjin People’s Republic of China Soochow University Suzhou People’s Republic of China Nanjing University Nanjing People’s Republic of China Tsinghua University Beijing People’s Republic of China Institute of Modern Physics Lanzhou People’s Republic of China Hunan University Changsha People’s Republic of China School of Physics and Electronics Hunan University Changsha China Shandong University Jinan People’s Republic of China Yunnan University Kunming People’s Republic of China H

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Full-polarimetric GPR for detecting ice fractures 17

Full-polarimetric GPR for detecting ice fractures

引用

17th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, GPR 2018

作者： Luo, Chaopeng Feng, Xuan Liu, Cai Zhang, Yan Nilot, Enhedelihai Zhang, Minghe Dong, Zejun Zhou, Haoqiu Science and Technology Near-Surface Detection Laboratory China Key Laboratory of Geophysical Exploration Equipment Ministry of Education Jilin University No.938 Xi MinZhu Street Changchun130026 China College of Geo-exploration Science and Technology Jilin University No.938 Xi Minzhu Street Changchun130026 China College of Earth Sciences Jilin University Changchun130061 China

ISBN: (纸本)9781538657775

The real-time monitoring of ice fracture width and direction is of great significance for the safety of Antarctic scientific expedition and the understanding of the process of ice fracture induced by avalanches. Using full-polarimetric ground penetrating radar (GPR) system to detect ice cracks, the scattering matrix is obtained and processed by polarization decomposition. Compared with the traditional pulse radar, more comprehensive and more intuitive information of ice cracks can be obtained. By using the Pauli decomposition method in polarization decomposition, the forward data obtained by the three-dimensional finite difference time domain (FDTD) method is processed, and the applicability of the proposed decomposition method is proved. For testing the feasibility, we performed numerical and laboratory experiments and applied the Pauli decomposition to the GPR data for ice fracture characterization. On this basis, the method is used to imaging small scale ice cracks on the lake surface, and good results are achieved, which paves the way for further practical application. © 2018 IEEE.

关键词： Polarization

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Design and Characterization of An Ultralow-Potential Drift Ag/AgCl Electric Field Sensor

Design and Characterization of An Ultralow-Potential Drift A...

引用

Chinese Control Conference

作者： Wang Luo Haobin Dong Jian Ge Huan Liu Bingjie Bar Cheng Zhang Zhiwen Yuan Jun Zhu Haiyang Zhang Hubei Key Laboratory of Advance Control and Intelligent Automation for Complex Systems Wuhan Hubei China Science and Technology on Near-Surface Detection Laboratory Wuxi Jiangsu China

This paper presents an all-solid porous Ag/AgCl electric field sensor with ultralow-potential drift for detecting the seafloor electric field signals. The superiority of porous electrode compared with flat electrode on the polarization stability is expounded, and the technological process using solid state agglomeration in developing the all-solid porous Ag/AgCl electrode core are described. Moreover, a new sensor shell is proposed. Numerous parameters, e.g., polarization resistance, self-potential, drift, etc., of the proposed electrode are tested. The experimental results show that the self-potential is less than ±0.1 mV, the source resistance is less than 0.01H, and the drift potential is less than ±5μV/24h, which indicate the superior performance of the proposed Ag/AgCl electric field sensor for marine electric field exploration.

关键词： Electrodes Electric potential Resistance Electric fields Solids Thermal stability Sea measurements

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Optimization of Overhauser magnetometer based on multi-channel frequency measurement algorithm

Optimization of Overhauser magnetometer based on multi-chann...

引用

Chinese Control Conference (CCC)

作者： Guanzhong Wang Haobin Dong Jian Ge Vang Luo Huan Liu Zhiwen Yuan Jun Zhu Haiyang Zhang Hubei Key Laboratory of Advance Control and Intelligent Automation for Complex Systems Wuhan Hubei China Science and Technology on Near-Surface Detection Laboratory Wuxi Jiangsu China

Overhauser magnetometer is a weak magnetic measuring instrument based on the dynamic nuclear polarization of free radical species. It has the characteristics of high precision, high sensitivity, low power consumption and continuous measurement. It is widely used in geophysics, aeromagnetic surveying, satellite Magnetic measuring, military and various engineering fields. Aiming at the problem that the measurement accuracy of the magnetometer prototype is low and the measurement effect is poor when the angle between the probe axis and the geomagnetic field is 0°, several optimization methods are proposed and the magnetometer is optimized by adding the frequency measurement channel on the basis of the prototype. Based on the standard deviation of GSM-19 measurement data, comparing the experimental data that use the multi -channel frequency measurement algorithm, the standard deviation of prototype data decreases from 0.397 to 0.203 when the angle between probe axial and geomagnetic field is 45°, the standard deviation of the prototype data decreases from 0.631 to 0.371 when the angle between probe axial and geomagnetic field is 0°, which provides an important reference for the follow-up optimization of the magnetometer.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Measurements of the center-of-mass energies of e^(+)e^(-)collisions at BESIII

引用

Chinese Physics C 2021年第10期45卷 7-15页

作者： M.Ablikim M.N.Achasov P.Adlarson S.Ahmed M.Albrecht R.Aliberti A.Amoroso M.R.An Q.An X.H.Bai Y.Bai O.Bakina R.Baldini Ferroli I.Balossino Y.Ban K.Begzsuren N.Berger M.Bertani D.Bettoni F.Bianchi J.Bloms A.Bortone I.Boyko R.A.Briere H.Cai X.Cai A.Calcaterra G.F.Cao N.Cao S.A.Cetin J.F.Chang W.L.Chang G.Chelkov D.Y.Chen G.Chen H.S.Chen M.L.Chen S.J.Chen X.R.Chen Y.B.Chen Z.J.Chen W.S.Cheng G.Cibinetto F.Cossio X.F.Cui H.L.Dai X.C.Dai A.Dbeyssi R.E.de Boer D.Dedovich Z.Y.Deng A.Denig I.Denysenko M.Destefanis F.De Mori Y.Ding C.Dong J.Dong L.Y.Dong M.Y.Dong X.Dong S.X.Du Y.L.Fan J.Fang S.S.Fang Y.Fang R.Farinelli L.Fava F.Feldbauer G.Felici C.Q.Feng J.H.Feng M.Fritsch C.D.Fu Y.Gao Y.Gao Y.Gao Y.G.Gao I.Garzia P.T.Ge C.Geng E.M.Gersabeck A Gilman K.Goetzen L.Gong W.X.Gong W.Gradl M.Greco L.M.Gu M.H.Gu Y.T.Gu C.Y Guan A.Q.Guo L.B.Guo R.P.Guo Y.P.Guo A.Guskov T.T.Han W.Y.Han X.Q.Hao F.A.Harris K.L.He F.H.Heinsius C.H.Heinz T.Held Y.K.Heng C.Herold M.Himmelreich T.Holtmann G.Y.Hou Y.R.Hou Z.L.Hou H.M.Hu J.F.Hu T.Hu Y.Hu G.S.Huang L.Q.Huang X.T.Huang Y.P.Huang Z.Huang T.Hussain N Husken W.Ikegami Andersson W.Imoehl M.Irshad S.Jaeger S.Janchiv Q.Ji Q.P.Ji X.B.Ji X.L.Ji Y.Y.Ji H.B.Jiang X.S.Jiang J.B.Jiao Z.Jiao S.Jin Y.Jin M.Q.Jing T.Johansson N.Kalantar-Nayestanaki X.S.Kang R.Kappert M.Kavatsyuk B.C.Ke I.K.Keshk A.Khoukaz P.Kiese R.Kiuchi R.Kliemt L.Koch O.B.Kolcu B.Kopf M.Kuemmel M.Kuessner A.Kupsc M.G.Kurth W.Kuhn J.J.Lane J.S.Lange P.Larin A.Lavania L.Lavezzi Z.H.Lei H.Leithoff M.Lellmann T.Lenz C.Li C.H.Li Cheng Li D.M.Li F.Li G.Li H.Li H.Li H.B.Li H.J.Li J.L.Li J.Q.Li J.S.Li Ke Li L.K.Li Lei Li P.R.Li S.Y.Li W.D.Li W.G.Li X.H.Li X.L.Li Xiaoyu Li Z.Y.Li H.Liang H.Liang H.Liang Y.F.Liang Y.T.Liang G.R.Liao L. Z. Liao J.Libby C.X.Lin B.J.Liu C.X.Liu D.Liu F.H.Liu Fang Liu Feng Liu H.B.Liu H.M.Liu Huanhuan Liu Huihui Liu J.B.Liu J.L.Liu J.Y.Liu K.Liu K.Y.Liu L.Liu M.H.Liu P.L.Liu Q.Liu Q.Liu S.B.Liu Shuai Liu T.Liu W.M.Liu X.Liu Y.Liu Y.B.Liu Z.A.Liu Z.Q.Liu X.C.Lou F.X.Lu H.J.Lu J.D.Lu J.G.Lu X.L.Lu Y.Lu Y.P.Lu C.L.Luo Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing 100049China Beihang University Beijing 100191China Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology Beijing 102617China Bochum Ruhr-University D-44780 BochumGermany Carnegie Mellon University PittsburghPennsylvania 15213USA Central China Normal University Wuhan 430079China China Center of Advanced Science and Technology Beijing 100190China COMSATS University Islamabad Lahore CampusDefence RoadOff Raiwind Road54000 LahorePakistan Fudan University Shanghai 200443China G.I.Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS(BINP) Novosibirsk 630090Russia GSI Helmholtzcentre for Heavy Ion Research GmbH D-64291 DarmstadtGermany Guangxi Normal University Guilin 541004China Guangxi University Nanning 530004China Hangzhou Normal University Hangzhou 310036China Helmholtz Institute Mainz Staudinger Weg 18D-55099 MainzGermany Henan Normal University Xinxiang 453007China Henan University of Science and Technology Luoyang 471003China Huangshan College Huangshan 245000China Hunan Normal University Changsha 410081China Hunan University Changsha 410082China Indian Institute of Technology Madras Chennai 600036India Indiana University BloomingtonIndiana 47405USA INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati INFN Laboratori Nazionali di FrascatiI-00044FrascatiItaly INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati INFN Sezione di PerugiaI-06100PerugiaItaly INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati University of PerugiaI-06100PerugiaItaly INFN Sezione di Ferrara INFN Sezione di FerraraI-44122FerraraItaly INFN Sezione di Ferrara University of FerraraI-44122FerraraItaly 25Institute of Modern PhysicsLanzhou 730000China Institute of Modern Physics Lanzhou 730000China Institute of Physics and Technology Peace Ave.54BUlaanbaatar 13330Mongolia Jilin University Changchun 130012China Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz Johann-Joachim-Becher-Weg 45D-55099 MainzGermany Joint Institute for Nuclear Research 141980 DubnaMoscow regionRussia Justus-Liebig-Universitaet Giessen II.Physikali

During the 2016-17 and 2018-19 running periods,the BESIII experiment collected 7.5 fb of e^(+)e^(-)collision data at center-of-mass energies ranging from 4.13 to 4.44 *** data samples are primarily used for the study of excited charmonium and charmoniumlike *** analyzing the di-muon process e^(+)e^(-)→(γISR=FSR)μ^(+)μ^(-),we measure the center-of-mass energies of the data samples with a precision of 0.6 *** a run-by-run study,we find that the center-of-mass energies were stable throughout most of the data-collection period.

关键词： center-of-mass energy e^(+)e^(-) annihilation BESIII

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Evidence of the singly Cabibbo suppressed decay Λc+→pπ0

引用

Physical Review D 2024年第9期109卷 L091101-L091101页

作者： M. Ablikim M. N. Achasov P. Adlarson X. C. Ai R. Aliberti A. Amoroso M. R. An Q. An Y. Bai O. Bakina I. Balossino Y. Ban V. Batozskaya K. Begzsuren N. Berger M. Berlowski M. Bertani D. Bettoni F. Bianchi E. Bianco A. Bortone I. Boyko R. A. Briere A. Brueggemann H. Cai X. Cai A. Calcaterra G. F. Cao N. Cao S. A. Cetin J. F. Chang T. T. Chang W. L. Chang G. R. Che G. Chelkov C. Chen Chao Chen G. Chen H. S. Chen M. L. Chen S. J. Chen S. M. Chen T. Chen X. R. Chen X. T. Chen Y. B. Chen Y. Q. Chen Z. J. Chen W. S. Cheng S. K. Choi X. Chu G. Cibinetto S. C. Coen F. Cossio J. J. Cui H. L. Dai J. P. Dai A. Dbeyssi R. E. de Boer D. Dedovich Z. Y. Deng A. Denig I. Denysenko M. Destefanis F. De Mori B. Ding X. X. Ding Y. Ding J. Dong L. Y. Dong M. Y. Dong X. Dong M. C. Du S. X. Du Z. H. Duan P. Egorov Y. H. Y. Fan Y. L. Fan J. Fang S. S. Fang W. X. Fang Y. Fang R. Farinelli L. Fava F. Feldbauer G. Felici C. Q. Feng J. H. Feng K. Fischer M. Fritsch C. Fritzsch C. D. Fu J. L. Fu Y. W. Fu H. Gao Y. N. Gao Yang Gao S. Garbolino I. Garzia P. T. Ge Z. W. Ge C. Geng E. M. Gersabeck A. Gilman K. Goetzen L. Gong W. X. Gong W. Gradl S. Gramigna M. Greco M. H. Gu C. Y. Guan Z. L. Guan A. Q. Guo L. B. Guo M. J. Guo R. P. Guo Y. P. Guo A. Guskov T. T. Han W. Y. Han X. Q. Hao F. A. Harris K. K. He K. L. He F. H. H. Heinsius C. H. Heinz Y. K. Heng C. Herold T. Holtmann P. C. Hong G. Y. Hou X. T. Hou Y. R. Hou Z. L. Hou H. M. Hu J. F. Hu T. Hu Y. Hu G. S. Huang K. X. Huang L. Q. Huang X. T. Huang Y. P. Huang T. Hussain N. Hüsken W. Imoehl J. Jackson S. Jaeger S. Janchiv J. H. Jeong Q. Ji Q. P. Ji X. B. Ji X. L. Ji Y. Y. Ji X. Q. Jia Z. K. Jia H. J. Jiang P. C. Jiang S. S. Jiang T. J. Jiang X. S. Jiang Y. Jiang J. B. Jiao Z. Jiao S. Jin Y. Jin M. Q. Jing T. Johansson X. K. S. Kabana N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki X. L. Kang X. S. Kang M. Kavatsyuk B. C. Ke A. Khoukaz R. Kiuchi R. Kliemt O. B. Kolcu B. Kopf M. Kuessner A. Kupsc W. Kühn J. J. Lane P. Larin A. Lavania L. Lavezzi T. T. Lei Z. H. Lei H. Leithoff M. Lellmann T. Lenz C. Li C. H. Li Cheng Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing 100049 People’s Republic of China Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS (BINP) Novosibirsk 630090 Russia Uppsala University Box 516 SE-75120 Uppsala Sweden Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou 450001 People’s Republic of China Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz Johann-Joachim-Becher-Weg 45 D-55099 Mainz Germany University of Turin and INFN University of Turin I-10125 Turin Italy INFN I-10125 Turin Italy Liaoning Normal University Dalian 116029 People’s Republic of China University of Science and Technology of China Hefei 230026 People’s Republic of China State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics Beijing 100049 Hefei 230026 People’s Republic of China Southeast University Nanjing 211100 People’s Republic of China Joint Institute for Nuclear Research 141980 Dubna Moscow region Russia INFN Sezione di Ferrara I-44122 Ferrara Italy Peking University Beijing 100871 People’s Republic of China National Centre for Nuclear Research Warsaw 02-093 Poland Institute of Physics and Technology Peace Avenue 54B Ulaanbaatar 13330 Mongolia INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati I-00044 Frascati Italy Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh Pennsylvania 15213 USA University of Muenster Wilhelm-Klemm-Strasse 9 48149 Muenster Germany Wuhan University Wuhan 430072 People’s Republic of China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100049 People’s Republic of China Turkish Accelerator Center Particle Factory Group Istinye University 34010 Istanbul Turkey Xinyang Normal University Xinyang 464000 People’s Republic of China Nankai University Tianjin 300071 People’s Republic of China Soochow University Suzhou 215006 People’s Republic of China Nanjing University Nanjing 210093 People’s Republic of China Tsinghua University Beijing 100084 People’s Republic of China Institute of Modern Physics Lanzhou 730000 People’s Republic of China Jilin University Changchun 130012 People’s Republic of China Hunan Univers

Evidence for the singly Cabibbo suppressed decay Λc+→pπ0 is reported for the first time with a statistical significance of 3.7σ based on 6.0 fb−1 of e+e− collision data collected at center-of-mass energies between 4.600 and 4.843 GeV with the BESIII detector at the BEPCII collider. The absolute branching fraction of Λc+→pπ0 is measured to be (1.56−0.58+0.72±0.20)×10−4. Combining with the branching fraction of Λc+→nπ+, (6.6±1.3)×10−4, the ratio of the branching fractions of Λc+→nπ+ and Λc+→pπ0 is calculated to be 3.2−1.2+2.2. As an important input for the theoretical models describing the decay mechanisms of charmed baryons, our result indicates that the nonfactorizable contributions play an essential role and their interference with the factorizable contributions should not be significant. In addition, the absolute branching fraction of Λc+→pη is measured to be (1.63±0.31stat±0.11syst)×10−3.

关键词： Branching fraction Hadronic decays Charmed baryons Hadrons

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Search for the light hadron decay χc1(3872)→π+π−η

引用

Physical Review D 2024年第1期109卷 L011102-L011102页

作者： M. Ablikim M. N. Achasov P. Adlarson X. C. Ai R. Aliberti A. Amoroso M. R. An Q. An Y. Bai O. Bakina I. Balossino Y. Ban V. Batozskaya K. Begzsuren N. Berger M. Berlowski M. Bertani D. Bettoni F. Bianchi E. Bianco A. Bortone I. Boyko R. A. Briere A. Brueggemann H. Cai X. Cai A. Calcaterra G. F. Cao N. Cao S. A. Cetin J. F. Chang T. T. Chang W. L. Chang G. R. Che G. Chelkov C. Chen Chao Chen G. Chen H. S. Chen M. L. Chen S. J. Chen S. M. Chen T. Chen X. R. Chen X. T. Chen Y. B. Chen Y. Q. Chen Z. J. Chen W. S. Cheng S. K. Choi X. Chu G. Cibinetto S. C. Coen F. Cossio J. J. Cui H. L. Dai J. P. Dai A. Dbeyssi R. E. de Boer D. Dedovich Z. Y. Deng A. Denig I. Denysenko M. Destefanis F. De Mori B. Ding X. X. Ding Y. Ding J. Dong L. Y. Dong M. Y. Dong X. Dong M. C. Du S. X. Du Z. H. Duan P. Egorov Y. L. Fan J. Fang S. S. Fang W. X. Fang Y. Fang R. Farinelli L. Fava F. Feldbauer G. Felici C. Q. Feng J. H. Feng K. Fischer M. Fritsch C. Fritzsch C. D. Fu J. L. Fu Y. W. Fu H. Gao Y. N. Gao Yang Gao S. Garbolino I. Garzia P. T. Ge Z. W. Ge C. Geng E. M. Gersabeck A. Gilman K. Goetzen L. Gong W. X. Gong W. Gradl S. Gramigna M. Greco M. H. Gu Y. T. Gu C. Y. Guan Z. L. Guan A. Q. Guo L. B. Guo M. J. Guo R. P. Guo Y. P. Guo A. Guskov T. T. Han W. Y. Han X. Q. Hao F. A. Harris K. K. He K. L. He F. H. H. Heinsius C. H. Heinz Y. K. Heng C. Herold T. Holtmann P. C. Hong G. Y. Hou X. T. Hou Y. R. Hou Z. L. Hou H. M. Hu J. F. Hu T. Hu Y. Hu G. S. Huang K. X. Huang L. Q. Huang X. T. Huang Y. P. Huang T. Hussain N. Hüsken W. Imoehl J. Jackson S. Jaeger S. Janchiv J. H. Jeong Q. Ji Q. P. Ji X. B. Ji X. L. Ji Y. Y. Ji X. Q. Jia Z. K. Jia H. J. Jiang P. C. Jiang S. S. Jiang T. J. Jiang X. S. Jiang Y. Jiang J. B. Jiao Z. Jiao S. Jin Y. Jin M. Q. Jing T. Johansson X. K. S. Kabana N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki X. L. Kang X. S. Kang R. Kappert M. Kavatsyuk B. C. Ke A. Khoukaz R. Kiuchi R. Kliemt O. B. Kolcu B. Kopf M. Kuessner A. Kupsc W. Kühn J. J. Lane P. Larin A. Lavania L. Lavezzi T. T. Lei Z. H. Lei H. Leithoff M. Lellmann T. Lenz C. Li C. H. L Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing 100049 People’s Republic of China Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS (BINP) Novosibirsk 630090 Russia Uppsala University Box 516 SE-75120 Uppsala Sweden Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou 450001 People’s Republic of China Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz Johann-Joachim-Becher-Weg 45 D-55099 Mainz Germany University of Turin and INFN University of Turin I-10125 Turin Italy INFN I-10125 Turin Italy Liaoning Normal University Dalian 116029 People’s Republic of China University of Science and Technology of China Hefei 230026 People’s Republic of China State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics Beijing 100049 Hefei 230026 People’s Republic of China Southeast University Nanjing 211100 People’s Republic of China Joint Institute for Nuclear Research 141980 Dubna Moscow region Russia INFN Sezione di Ferrara INFN Sezione di Ferrara I-44122 Ferrara Italy Peking University Beijing 100871 People’s Republic of China National Centre for Nuclear Research Warsaw 02-093 Poland Institute of Physics and Technology Peace Avenue 54B Ulaanbaatar 13330 Mongolia INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati I-00044 Frascati Italy Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh Pennsylvania 15213 USA University of Muenster Wilhelm-Klemm-Strasse 9 48149 Muenster Germany Wuhan University Wuhan 430072 People’s Republic of China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100049 People’s Republic of China Turkish Accelerator Center Particle Factory Group Istinye University 34010 Istanbul Turkey Xinyang Normal University Xinyang 464000 People’s Republic of China Nankai University Tianjin 300071 People’s Republic of China Soochow University Suzhou 215006 People’s Republic of China Nanjing University Nanjing 210093 People’s Republic of China Tsinghua University Beijing 100084 People’s Republic of China Institute of Modern Physics Lanzhou 730000 People’s Republic of China Jilin Univer

With a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 11.5 fb−1 collected with the BESIII detector operating at the BEPCII storage ring, for the first time the light hadron decay χc1(3872)→π+π−η is searched for. While no significant signal is observed, the upper limits at the 90% confidence level for σ[e+e−→γχc1(3872)]B[χc1(3872)→π+π−η] at center of mass energies from 4.13 GeV to 4.34 GeV are determined. By normalizing to the χc1(3872)→π+π−J/ψ decay channel, a 90% confidence level upper limit for the branching fraction ratio R=B[χc1(3872)→π+π−η]/B[χc1(3872)→π+π−J/ψ]<0.12 is given. These measurements provide important inputs for understanding the internal structure of the χc1(3872) resonance.

关键词： Branching fraction Hadronic decays Exotic mesons

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Observation of the singly Cabibbo-suppressed decay Λc+→Σ−K+π+

引用

Physical Review D 2024年第7期109卷 L071103-L071103页

The singly Cabibbo-suppressed decay Λc+→Σ−K+π+ is observed for the first time with a statistical significance of 5.4σ by using 4.5 fb−1 of e+e− collision data collected at center-of-mass energies between 4.600 and 4.699 GeV with the BESIII detector at BEPCII. The absolute branching fraction of Λc+→Σ−K+π+ is measured to be (3.8±1.2stat±0.2syst)×10−4 in a model-independent approach. This is the first observation of a Cabibbo-suppressed Λc+ decay involving Σ− in the final state. The ratio of branching fractions between Λc+→Σ−K+π+ and the Cabibbo-favored decay Λc+→Σ−π+π+ is observed to be (0.4±0.1)sc2, where sc≡sinθc=0.2248 with θc the Cabibbo mixing angle.

关键词： Hadronic decays Charmed baryons

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Observation of ψ(3770)→ηJ/ψ

引用

Physical Review D 2023年第9期107卷 L091101-L091101页

作者： M. Ablikim M. N. Achasov P. Adlarson S. Ahmed M. Albrecht R. Aliberti A. Amoroso M. R. An Q. An X. H. Bai Y. Bai O. Bakina R. Baldini Ferroli I. Balossino Y. Ban V. Batozskaya D. Becker K. Begzsuren N. Berger M. Bertani D. Bettoni F. Bianchi J. Bloms A. Bortone I. Boyko R. A. Briere A. Brueggemann H. Cai X. Cai A. Calcaterra G. F. Cao N. Cao S. A. Cetin J. F. Chang W. L. Chang G. Chelkov C. Chen G. Chen H. S. Chen M. L. Chen S. J. Chen T. Chen X. R. Chen X. T. Chen Y. B. Chen Z. J. Chen W. S. Cheng G. Cibinetto F. Cossio J. J. Cui H. L. Dai J. P. Dai A. Dbeyssi R. E. de Boer D. Dedovich Z. Y. Deng A. Denig I. Denysenko M. Destefanis F. De Mori Y. Ding J. Dong L. Y. Dong M. Y. Dong X. Dong S. X. Du P. Egorov Y. L. Fan J. Fang S. S. Fang Y. Fang R. Farinelli L. Fava F. Feldbauer G. Felici C. Q. Feng J. H. Feng K. Fischer M. Fritsch C. D. Fu H. Gao Y. N. Gao Yang Gao I. Garzia P. T. Ge Z. W. Ge C. Geng E. M. Gersabeck A. Gilman K. Goetzen L. Gong W. X. Gong W. Gradl M. Greco L. M. Gu M. H. Gu Y. T. Gu C. Y. Guan A. Q. Guo L. B. Guo R. P. Guo Y. P. Guo A. Guskov T. T. Han W. Y. Han X. Q. Hao F. A. Harris K. K. He K. L. He F. H. Heinsius C. H. Heinz Y. K. Heng C. Herold M. Himmelreich T. Holtmann G. Y. Hou Y. R. Hou Z. L. Hou H. M. Hu J. F. Hu T. Hu Y. Hu G. S. Huang K. X. Huang L. Q. Huang X. T. Huang Y. P. Huang Z. Huang T. Hussain N. Hüsken W. Imoehl M. Irshad J. Jackson S. Jaeger S. Janchiv Q. Ji Q. P. Ji X. B. Ji X. L. Ji Y. Y. Ji H. B. Jiang S. S. Jiang X. S. Jiang Y. Jiang J. B. Jiao Z. Jiao S. Jin Y. Jin M. Q. Jing T. Johansson N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki X. S. Kang R. Kappert M. Kavatsyuk B. C. Ke I. K. Keshk A. Khoukaz P. Kiese R. Kiuchi R. Kliemt L. Koch O. B. Kolcu B. Kopf M. Kuemmel M. Kuessner A. Kupsc W. Kühn J. J. Lane J. S. Lange P. Larin A. Lavania L. Lavezzi Z. H. Lei H. Leithoff M. Lellmann T. Lenz C. Li C. H. Li Cheng Li D. M. Li F. Li G. Li H. Li H. B. Li H. J. Li H. N. Li J. Q. Li J. S. Li J. W. Li Ke Li L. J. Li L. K. Li Lei Li M. H. Li P. R. Li S. X. Li S. Y. Li T. Li W. D. Li W. G. Li X. H. Li X. Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing 100049 People’s Republic of China G.I. Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS (BINP) Novosibirsk 630090 Russia Uppsala University Box 516 SE-75120 Uppsala Sweden Helmholtz Institute Mainz Staudinger Weg 18 D-55099 Mainz Germany Bochum Ruhr-University D-44780 Bochum Germany Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz Johann-Joachim-Becher-Weg 45 D-55099 Mainz Germany University of Turin and INFN University of Turin I-10125 Turin Italy INFN I-10125 Turin Italy Liaoning Normal University Dalian 116029 People’s Republic of China University of Science and Technology of China Hefei 230026 People’s Republic of China State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics Beijing 100049 Hefei 230026 People’s Republic of China University of Jinan Jinan 250022 People’s Republic of China Southeast University Nanjing 211100 People’s Republic of China Joint Institute for Nuclear Research 141980 Dubna Moscow region Russia INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati I-00044 Frascati Italy INFN Sezione di Ferrara I-44122 Ferrara Italy Peking University Beijing 100871 People’s Republic of China National Centre for Nuclear Research Warsaw 02-093 Poland Institute of Physics and Technology Peace Avenue 54B Ulaanbaatar 13330 Mongolia University of Muenster Wilhelm-Klemm-Strasse 9 48149 Muenster Germany Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh Pennsylvania 15213 USA Wuhan University Wuhan 430072 People’s Republic of China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100049 People’s Republic of China Turkish Accelerator Center Particle Factory Group Istinye University 34010 Istanbul Turkey Nankai University Tianjin 300071 People’s Republic of China Nanjing University Nanjing 210093 People’s Republic of China Institute of Modern Physics Lanzhou 730000 People’s Republic of China Hunan University Changsha 410082 People’s Republic of China Shandong University Jinan 250100 People’s Republic of China Yunnan University Kunming 6505

Using a data sample collected with the BESIII detector operating at the BEPCII storage ring, the Born cross section of the process e+e−→ηJ/ψ at a center-of-mass energy s=3.773 GeV is measured to be (8.88±0.87±0.42) pb. We fit the cross section line shape before correcting for the initial state radiation from s=3.773 to 4.600 GeV to obtain the branching fraction B(ψ(3770)→ηJ/ψ). We obtain B(ψ(3770)→ηJ/ψ)=(11.3±5.9±1.1)×10−4 when the ψ(3770) decay amplitude is added coherently to the other contributions, and (8.7±1.0±0.8)×10−4 when it is added incoherently. Here the quoted uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively. In both cases, the statistical significance of ψ(3770) resonance is above 7σ. This is the first time the decay ψ(3770)→ηJ/ψ is observed with a statistical significance greater than 5σ.

关键词： Particle interactions Particle production Quarkonia Lepton colliders

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Erratum to: Search for new hadronic decays of hc and observation of

引用

Journal of High Energy Physics 2023年第3期2023卷 1-5页

作者： Ablikim, M. Achasov, M. N. Adlarson, P. Ahmed, S. Albrecht, M. Aliberti, R. Amoroso, A. An, M. R. An, Q. Bai, X. H. Bai, Y. Bakina, O. Baldini Ferroli, R. Balossino, I. Ban, Y. Begzsuren, K. Berger, N. Bertani, M. Bettoni, D. Bianchi, F. Bloms, J. Bortone, A. Boyko, I. Briere, R. A. Cai, H. Cai, X. Calcaterra, A. Cao, G. F. Cao, N. Cetin, S. A. Chang, J. F. Chang, W. L. Chelkov, G. Chen, G. Chen, H. S. Chen, M. L. Chen, S. J. Chen, X. R. Chen, Y. B. Chen, Z. J. Cheng, W. S. Cibinetto, G. Cossio, F. Cui, J. J. Cui, X. F. Dai, H. L. Dai, J. P. Dai, X. C. Dbeyssi, A. de Boer, R. E. Dedovich, D. Deng, Z. Y. Denig, A. Denysenko, I. Destefanis, M. De Mori, F. Ding, Y. Dong, C. Dong, J. Dong, L. Y. Dong, M. Y. Dong, X. Du, S. X. Egorov, P. Fan, Y. L. Fang, J. Fang, S. S. Fang, Y. Farinelli, R. Fava, L. Feldbauer, F. Felici, G. Feng, C. Q. Feng, J. H. Fritsch, M. Fu, C. D. Gao, Y. Garzia, I. Ge, P. T. Geng, C. Gersabeck, E. M. Gilman, A Goetzen, K. Gong, L. Gong, W. X. Gradl, W. Greco, M. Gu, L. M. Gu, M. H. Guan, C. Y Guo, A. Q. Guo, L. B. Guo, R. P. Guo, Y. P. Guskov, A. Han, T. T. Han, W. Y. Hao, X. Q. Harris, F. A. He, K. K. He, K. L. Heinsius, F. H. Heinz, C. H. Heng, Y. K. Herold, C. Himmelreich, M. Holtmann, T. Hou, G. Y. Hou, Y. R. Hou, Z. L. Hu, H. M. Hu, J. F. Hu, T. Hu, Y. Huang, G. S. Huang, L. Q. Huang, X. T. Huang, Y. P. Huang, Z. Hussain, T. Hüsken, N Ikegami Andersson, W. Imoehl, W. Irshad, M. Jaeger, S. Janchiv, S. Ji, Q. Ji, Q. P. Ji, X. B. Ji, X. L. Ji, Y. Y. Jiang, H. B. Jiang, X. S. Jiao, J. B. Jiao, Z. Jin, S. Jin, Y. Jing, M. Q. Johansson, T. Kalantar-Nayestanaki, N. Kang, X. S. Kappert, R. Kavatsyuk, M. Ke, B. C. Keshk, I. K. Khoukaz, A. Kiese, P. Kiuchi, R. Kliemt, R. Koch, L. Kolcu, O. B. Kopf, B. Kuemmel, M. Kuessner, M. Kupsc, A. Kurth, M. G. Kühn, W. Lane, J. J. Lange, J. S. Larin, P. Lavania, A. Lavezzi, L. Lei, Z. H. Leithoff, H. Lellmann, M. Lenz, T. Li, C. Li, C. H. Li, Cheng Li, D. M. Li, F. Li, G. Li, H. Li, H. B. Li, H. J. Li, H. N. Li, J. L. Li, J. Q. Li, J. S. Li, Ke Li, L. K. Li, Le Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing People’s Republic of China G.I. Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS (BINP) Novosibirsk Russia Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden Helmholtz Institute Mainz Mainz Germany Bochum Ruhr-University Bochum Germany Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz Mainz Germany University of Turin Turin Italy INFN Turin Italy Liaoning Normal University Dalian People’s Republic of China University of Science and Technology of China Hefei People’s Republic of China State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics Hefei People’s Republic of China University of Jinan Jinan People’s Republic of China Southeast University Nanjing People’s Republic of China Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna Russia INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati Frascati Italy INFN Sezione di Ferrara Ferrara Italy Peking University Beijing People’s Republic of China State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology Peking University Beijing People’s Republic of China Institute of Physics and Technology Ulaanbaatar Mongolia University of Muenster Muenster Germany Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh USA Wuhan University Wuhan People’s Republic of China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing People’s Republic of China Turkish Accelerator Center Particle Factory Group Istinye University Istanbul Turkey Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology Moscow Russia Nanjing University Nanjing People’s Republic of China Institute of Modern Physics Lanzhou People’s Republic of China Hunan University Changsha People’s Republic of China School of Physics and Electronics Hunan University Changsha China Shandong University Jinan People’s Republic of China Nankai University Tianjin People’s Republic of China Yunnan University Kunming People’s Republic of China Liaoning University Shenyang People’s Republic of China Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou People’s Republic of China University

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：