检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 2025年第1期12卷 1-13页

作者： Louis Longin Deisy Briceno Oleksandra Poquet Faculty of Philosophy Philosophy of Science and the Study of Religion Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Munich Germany LEAPS Lab—LEarning Analytics and Practices in Systems Department of Educational Sciences School of Social Sciences and Technology Technical University of Munich Munich Germany Munich Data Science Institute Technical University of Munich Munich Germany Centre for Change and Complexity in Learning University of South Australia Adelaide Australia

The ethical integration of the data generated by learners into educational practices is of great importance now that data-rich technologies are prevalent in education. Despite the common agreement that learners should have agency in deciding what to do with their data, existing ethical discussions focus on policies or algorithms, with limited attention to participatory learner practices. Participatory practices, particularly around informed consent, can support ethical and meaningful engagement with data sharing decisions. Using a novel experimental methodology, we explored how the decision context influences the perceived acceptability for sharing learning data. We found that participants became more cautious in sharing their data in and after a group discussion. The willingness to share was the lowest when these data were submitted to a government entity and for a collective benefit. Further network analysis of group discussions confirmed the observed attitude shifts: participants consistently discussed different aspects of sharing learning data based on the context such as sharing process vs outcome-related learning data. The results suggest that educational data consent is contextual and that perceptions of privacy in educational technology may differ from those in health contexts. The proposed method of interactive consent, therefore, not only contributes to theories explaining privacy and effective data collection but also represents a new way of conceptualising and realising participatory informed consent.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：