检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

arXiv 2022年

作者： Dawid, Anna Arnold, Julian Requena, Borja Gresch, Alexander Plodzien, Marcin Donatella, Kaelan Nicoli, Kim A. Stornati, Paolo Koch, Rouven Büttner, Miriam Okula, Robert Muñoz–Gil, Gorka Vargas–Hernández, Rodrigo A. Cervera-Lierta, Alba Carrasquilla, Juan Dunjko, Vedran Gabrié, Marylou Huembeli, Patrick van Nieuwenburg, Evert Vicentini, Filippo Wang, Lei Wetzel, Sebastian J. Carleo, Giuseppe Greplová, Eliška Krems, Roman Marquardt, Florian Tomza, Michal Lewenstein, Maciej Dauphin, Alexandre Faculty of Physics University of Warsaw Poland ICFO - Institut de Ciències Fotòniques The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology Castelldefels Barcelona08860 Spain Center for Computational Quantum Physics Flatiron Institute New York United States Department of Physics University of Basel Switzerland Institute for Theoretical Physics Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf Germany Institute for Quantum Inspired and Quantum Optimization Hamburg University of Technology Germany Université de Paris CNRS Laboratoire Matériaux et Phénomènes Quantiques France Machine Learning Group Technische Universität Berlin Germany BIFOLD Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data Berlin10587 Germany Department of Applied Physics Aalto University Espoo Finland Institute of Physics Albert-Ludwig University of Freiburg Germany International Centre for Theory of Quantum Technologies University of Gdańsk Poland Department of Algorithms and System Modeling Faculty of Electronics Faculty of Electronics Telecommunications and Informatics Gdańsk University of Technology Poland Institute for Theoretical Physics University of Innsbruck Austria Department of Chemistry University of Toronto Canada Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence MaRS Centre Toronto Canada Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology McMaster University Hamilton Canada Barcelona Supercomputing Center Spain LIACS Leiden University Netherlands CMAP École Polytechnique France Switzerland Menten AI Inc. Palo AltoCA United States Niels Bohr Institute Copenhagen Denmark CPHT CNRS École Polytechnique Institut Polytechnique de Paris PalaiseauF-91128 France Beijing National Lab for Condensed Matter Physics Institute of Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory Dongguan China Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics Waterloo Canada Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft University of Technology DelftNL-2600 GA Netherlands Department of

In this book, we provide a comprehensive introduction to the most recentadvances in the application of machine learning methods in quantum sciences. Wecover the use of deep learning and kernel methods in supervised, unsupervised,and reinforcement learning algorithms for phase classification, representationof many-body quantum states, quantum feedback control, and quantum circuitsoptimization. Moreover, we introduce and discuss more specialized topics suchas differentiable programming, generative models, statistical approach tomachine learning, and quantum machine learning. © 2022, CC BY.

关键词： Deep learning

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Metadata Concepts for Advancing the Use of Digital Health Technologies in Clinical Research

引用

Digital Biomarkers 2019年第3期3卷 116-132页

作者： Badawy, Reham Hameed, Farhan Bataille, Lauren Little, Max A. Claes, Kasper Saria, Suchi Cedarbaum, Jesse M. Stephenson, Diane Neville, Jon Maetzler, Walter Espay, Alberto J. Bloem, Bastiaan R. Simuni, Tanya Karlin, Daniel R. School of Computer Science University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom Digital Medicine and Pfizer Innovation Research Lab Early Clinical Development Pfizer Inc. CambridgeMA United States College of Computer and Information Science Northeastern University BostonMA United States Analytics Informatics and Business Intelligence Chief Digital Office Pfizer Inc. New YorkNY United States Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research New YorkNY United States Media Lab Massachusetts Institute of Technology CambridgeMA United States UCB Biopharma Brussels Belgium Machine Learning and Healthcare Laboratory Departments of Computer Science Statistics and Health Policy Malone Center for Engineering in Healthcare Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality Johns Hopkins University BaltimoreMD United States Biogen CambridgeMA United States Critical Path Institute TucsonAZ United States Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium AustinTX United States Department of Neurology Christian Albrecht University Kiel Germany James J. and Joan A. Gardner Family Center for Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders University of Cincinnati CincinnatiOH United States Department of Neurology Donders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behavior Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen Netherlands Department of Neurology Gardner Center for Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders UC Gardner Neuroscience Institute University of Cincinnati CincinnatiOH United States Tufts University School of Medicine BostonMA United States HealthMode New YorkNY United States School of Engineering and Applied Science Aston University BirminghamB47ET United Kingdom

Digital health technologies (smartphones, smartwatches, and other body-worn sensors) can act as novel tools to aid in the diagnosis and remote objective monitoring of an individual's disease symptoms, both in clinical care and in research. Nonetheless, such digital health technologies have yet to widely demonstrate value in clinical research due to insufficient data interpretability and lack of regulatory acceptance. Metadata, i.e., data that accompany and describe the primary data, can be utilized to better understand the context of the sensor data and can assist in data management, data sharing, and subsequent data analysis. The need for data and metadata standards for digital health technologies has been raised in academic and industry research communities and has also been noted by regulatory authorities. Therefore, to address this unmet need, we here propose a metadata set that reflects regulatory guidelines and that can serve as a conceptual map to (1) inform researchers on the metadata they should collect in digital health studies, aiming to increase the interpretability and exchangeability of their data, and (2) direct standard development organizations on how to extend their existing standards to incorporate digital health technologies. The proposed metadata set is informed by existing standards pertaining to clinical trials and medical devices, in addition to existing schemas that have supported digital health technology studies. We illustrate this specifically in the context of Parkinson's disease, as a model for a wide range of other chronic conditions for which remote monitoring would be useful in both care and science. We invite the scientific and clinical research communities to apply the proposed metadata set to ongoing and planned research. Where the proposed metadata fall short, we ask users to contribute to its ongoing revision so that an adequate degree of consensus can be maintained in a rapidly evolving technology landscape. © 2019 The Author(s

关键词： Metadata

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Analysis of the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2024年

作者： LaBella, Dominic Baid, Ujjwal Khanna, Omaditya McBurney-Lin, Shan McLean, Ryan Nedelec, Pierre Rashid, Arif Tahon, Nourel Hoda Altes, Talissa Bhalerao, Radhika Dhemesh, Yaseen Godfrey, Devon Hilal, Fathi Floyd, Scott Janas, Anastasia Kazerooni, Anahita Fathi Kirkpatrick, John Kent, Collin Kofler, Florian Leu, Kevin Maleki, Nazanin Menze, Bjoern Pajot, Maxence Reitman, Zachary J. Rudie, Jeffrey D. Saluja, Rachit Velichko, Yury Wang, Chunhao Warman, Pranav Adewole, Maruf Albrecht, Jake Anazodo, Udunna Anwar, Syed Muhammad Bergquist, Timothy Chen, Sully Francis Chung, Verena Conte, Gian-Marco Dako, Farouk Eddy, James Ezhov, Ivan Khalili, Nastaran Iglesias, Juan Eugenio Jiang, Zhifan Johanson, Elaine Van Leemput, Koen Li, Hongwei Bran Linguraru, Marius George Liu, Xinyang Mahtabfar, Aria Meier, Zeke Moawad, Ahmed W. Mongan, John Piraud, Marie Shinohara, Russell Takeshi Wiggins, Walter F. Abayazeed, Aly H. Akinola, Rachel Jakab, András Bilello, Michel de Verdier, Maria Correia Crivellaro, Priscila Davatzikos, Christos Farahani, Keyvan Freymann, John Hess, Christopher Huang, Raymond Lohmann, Philipp Moassefi, Mana Pease, Matthew W. Vollmuth, Phillipp Sollmann, Nico Diffley, David Nandolia, Khanak K. Warren, Daniel I. Hussain, Ali Fehringer, Pascal Bronstein, Yulia Deptula, Lisa Stein, Evan G. Taherzadeh, Mahsa de Oliveira, Eduardo Portela Haughey, Aoife Kontzialis, Marinos Saba, Luca Turner, Benjamin Brüßeler, Melanie M.T. Ansari, Shehbaz Gkampenis, Athanasios Weiss, David Maximilian Mansour, Aya Shawali, Islam H. Yordanov, Nikolay Stein, Joel M. Hourani, Roula Moshebah, Mohammed Yahya Abouelatta, Ahmed Magdy Rizvi, Tanvir Willms, Klara Martin, Dann C. Okar, Abdullah D'Anna, Gennaro Taha, Ahmed Sharifi, Yasaman Faghani, Shahriar Kite, Dominic Pinho, Marco Haider, Muhammad Ammar Aristizabal, Alejandro Karargyris, Alexandros Kassem, Hasan Pati, Sarthak Sheller, Micah Alonso-Basanta, Michelle Villanueva-Meyer, Javier Rauschecker, Andreas M. Nada, Ayman Aboian, Mariam Flanders, Adam E. Wiestler, Benedikt Bakas, Spyridon Ca Duke University Medical Center Department of Radiation Oncology DurhamNC United States Division of Computational Pathology Department of Pathology Laboratory Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine IndianapolisIN United States Center for Federated Learning in Medicine Indiana University IndianapolisIN United States Department of Neurosurgery Thomas Jefferson University PhiladelphiaPA United States University of California San FranciscoCA United States Yale University New HavenCT United States Department of Radiation Oncology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States University of Missouri ColumbiaMO United States Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science Indiana University School of Medicine IndianapolisIN United States Children's Hospital of Philadelphia University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Helmholtz AI Helmholtz Munich Germany Department of Informatics Technical University Munich Germany TranslaTUM - Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research Technical University of Munich Germany Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology School of Medicine Klinikum rechts der Isar Technical University of Munich Germany San FranciscoCA United States Biomedical Image Analysis and Machine Learning Department of Quantitative Biomedicine University of Zurich Switzerland Department of Neuroradiology Technical University of Munich Munich Germany University of San Diego CA United States Cornell University IthacaNY United States Department of Radiology Northwestern University EvanstonIL United States Duke University Medical Center School of Medicine DurhamNC United States Lab Crestview Radiology Lagos Nigeria Sage Bionetworks United States McGill University MontrealQC Canada Children's National Hospital WashingtonDC United States George Washington University WashingtonDC United State

We describe the design and results from the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge. The BraTS Meningioma Challenge differed from prior BraTS Glioma challenges in that it focused on meningiomas, which are typically benign extra-axial tumors with diverse radiologic and anatomical presentation and a propensity for multiplicity. Nine participating teams each developed deep-learning automated segmentation models using image data from the largest multi-institutional systematically expert annotated multilabel multi-sequence meningioma MRI dataset to date, which included 1000 training set cases, 141 validation set cases, and 283 hidden test set cases. Each case included T2, T2/FLAIR, T1, and T1Gd brain MRI sequences with associated tumor compartment labels delineating enhancing tumor, non-enhancing tumor, and surrounding non-enhancing T2/FLAIR hyperintensity. Participant automated segmentation models were evaluated and ranked based on a scoring system evaluating lesion-wise metrics including dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff Distance. The top ranked team had a lesion-wise median dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.976, 0.976, and 0.964 for enhancing tumor, tumor core, and whole tumor, respectively and a corresponding average DSC of 0.899, 0.904, and 0.871, respectively. These results serve as state-of-the-art benchmarks for future pre-operative meningioma automated segmentation algorithms. Additionally, we found that 1286 of 1424 cases (90.3%) had at least 1 compartment voxel abutting the edge of the skull-stripped image edge, which requires further investigation into optimal pre-processing face anonymization steps. © 2024, CC BY.

关键词： Tumors

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge 2024: Meningioma Radiotherapy Planning Automated Segmentation

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2024年

作者： LaBella, Dominic Schumacher, Katherine Mix, Michael Leu, Kevin McBurney-Lin, Shan Nedelec, Pierre Villanueva-Meyer, Javier Shapey, Jonathan Vercauteren, Tom Chia, Kazumi Ivory, Marina Barfoot, Theodore Al-Salihi, Omar Leu, Justin Halasz, Lia Velichko, Yury Wang, Chunhao Kirkpatrick, John Floyd, Scott Reitman, Zachary J. Mullikin, Trey Bagci, Ulas Sachdev, Sean Hattangadi-Gluth, Jona A. Seibert, Tyler M. Farid, Nikdokht Puett, Connor Pease, Matthew W. Shiue, Kevin Anwar, Syed Muhammad Faghani, Shahriar Taylor, Peter Haider, Muhammad Ammar Warman, Pranav Albrecht, Jake Jakab, András Moassefi, Mana Chung, Verena Aristizabal, Alejandro Karargyris, Alexandros Kassem, Hasan Pati, Sarthak Sheller, Micah Coley, Aaron Huang, Christina Ghanta, Siddharth Schneider, Alex Sharp, Conrad Saluja, Rachit Kofler, Florian Lohmann, Philipp Vollmuth, Phillipp Gagnon, Louis Adewole, Maruf Li, Hongwei Bran Kazerooni, Anahita Fathi Tahon, Nourel Hoda Anazodo, Udunna Moawad, Ahmed W. Menze, Bjoern Linguraru, Marius George Aboian, Mariam Wiestler, Benedikt Baid, Ujjwal Conte, Gian-Marco Rauschecker, Andreas M. Nada, Ayman Abayazeed, Aly H. Huang, Raymond de Verdier, Maria Correia Rudie, Jeffrey D. Bakas, Spyridon Calabrese, Evan Department of Radiation Oncology Duke University Medical Center DurhamNC United States Department of Radiation Oncology SUNY Upstate Medical University SyracuseNY United States San FranciscoCA United States Department of Neurosurgery King’s College Hospital London United Kingdom School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences King’s College London London United Kingdom Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust United Kingdom Department of Radiation Oncology University of Washington SeattleWA United States Department of Radiology Northwestern University EvanstonIL United States Department of Radiation Oncology Northwestern University EvanstonIL United States Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences University of California San Diego La Jolla CA United States Department of Radiology University of California San Diego La Jolla CA United States Department of Bioengineering University of California San Diego La Jolla CA United States Department of Neurological Surgery Indiana University School of Medicine IndianapolisIN United States Department of Radiation Oncology Indiana University IndianapolisIN United States Children’s National Hospital WashingtonDC United States George Washington University WashingtonDC United States Mayo Clinic RochesterMN United States CMH Lahore Medical College Lahore Pakistan Duke University Medical Center School of Medicine DurhamNC United States Sage Bionetworks United States University of Zürich Zürich Switzerland Artificial Intelligence Lab Department of Radiology Mayo Clinic RochesterMN United States MLCommons United States Factored AI United States Center For Federated Learning in Medicine Indiana University IndianapolisIN United States Division of Computational Pathology Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine IndianapolisIN United States Medical Working Group MLCommons San FranciscoCA United States Intel United States Duke Universi

The 2024 Brain Tumor Segmentation Meningioma Radiotherapy (BraTS-MEN-RT) challenge aims to advance automated segmentation algorithms using the largest known multi-institutional dataset of 750 radiotherapy planning brain MRIs with expert-annotated target labels for patients with intact or postoperative meningioma that underwent either conventional external beam radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery. Each case includes a defaced 3D post-contrast T1-weighted radiotherapy planning MRI in its native acquisition space, accompanied by a single-label "target volume" representing the gross tumor volume (GTV) and any at-risk postoperative site. Target volume annotations adhere to established radiotherapy planning protocols, ensuring consistency across cases and institutions. For preoperative meningiomas, the target volume encompasses the entire GTV and associated nodular dural tail, while for postoperative cases, it includes at-risk resection cavity margins as determined by the treating institution. Case annotations were reviewed and approved by expert neuroradiologists and radiation oncologists. Participating teams will develop, containerize, and evaluate automated segmentation models using this comprehensive dataset. Model performance will be assessed using an adapted lesion-wise Dice Similarity Coefficient and the 95% Hausdorff distance. The top-performing teams will be recognized at the Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention Conference in October 2024. BraTS-MEN-RT is expected to significantly advance automated radiotherapy planning by enabling precise tumor segmentation and facilitating tailored treatment, ultimately improving patient outcomes. © 2024, CC BY.

关键词： Radiotherapy

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Local White Matter Architecture Defines Functional Brain Dynamics

Local White Matter Architecture Defines Functional Brain Dyn...

引用

IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics

作者： Yo Joong Choe Sivaraman Balakrishnan Aarti Singh Jean M. Vettel Timothy Verstynen Dept. of Statistics and Data Science Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh PA USA Kakao Seongnam-si South Korea Machine Learning Dept. Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh PA USA U.S. Army Research Laboratory MD USA Dept. of Psychology and CNBC Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh PA USA

Large bundles of myelinated axons, called white matter, anatomically connect disparate brain regions together and compose the structural core of the human connectome. We recently proposed a method of measuring the local integrity along the length of each white matter fascicle, termed the local connectome [1]. If communication efficiency is fundamentally constrained by the integrity along the entire length of a white matter bundle [2], then variability in the functional dynamics of brain networks should be associated with variability in the local connectome. We test this prediction using two statistical approaches that are capable of handling the high dimensionality of data. First, by performing statistical inference on distance-based correlations, we show that similarity in the local connectome between individuals is significantly correlated with similarity in their patterns of functional connectivity. Second, by employing variable selection using sparse canonical correlation analysis and cross-validation, we show that segments of the local connectome are predictive of certain patterns of functional brain dynamics. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that structural variability along axon bundles constrains communication between disparate brain regions.

关键词： Correlation White matter Functional magnetic resonance imaging Euclidean distance Image reconstruction Axons

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

The Brain Tumor Segmentation in Pediatrics (BraTS-PEDs) Challenge: Focus on Pediatrics (CBTN-CONNECT-DIPGR-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS-PEDs)

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2024年

作者： Kazerooni, Anahita Fathi Khalili, Nastaran Liu, Xinyang Gandhi, Deep Jiang, Zhifan Anwar, Syed Muhammed Albrecht, Jake Adewole, Maruf Anazodo, Udunna Anderson, Hannah Baid, Ujjwal Bergquist, Timothy Borja, Austin J. Calabrese, Evan Chung, Verena Conte, Gian-Marco Dako, Farouk Eddy, James Ezhov, Ivan Familiar, Ariana Farahani, Keyvan Franson, Andrea Gottipati, Anurag Haldar, Shuvanjan Iglesias, Juan Eugenio Janas, Anastasia Johansen, Elaine Jones, Blaise V. Khalili, Neda Kofler, Florian LaBella, Dominic Lai, Hollie Anne Van Leemput, Koen Li, Hongwei Bran Maleki, Nazanin McAllister, Aaron S. Meier, Zeke Menze, Bjoern Moawad, Ahmed W. Nandolia, Khanak K. Pavaine, Julija Piraud, Marie Poussaint, Tina Prabhu, Sanjay P. Reitman, Zachary Rudie, Jeffrey D. Sanchez-Montano, Mariana Shaikh, Ibraheem Salman Sheth, Nakul Tu, Wenxin Wang, Chunhao Ware, Jeffrey B. Wiestler, Benedikt Zapaishchykova, Anna Bornhorst, Miriam Deutsch, Michelle Fouladi, Maryam Lazow, Margot Mikael, Leonie Hummel, Trent Kann, Benjamin de Blank, Peter Hoffman, Lindsey Aboian, Mariam Nabavizadeh, Ali Packer, Roger Bakas, Spyridon Resnick, Adam Rood, Brian Vossough, Arastoo Linguraru, Marius George Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Neurosurgery University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Sheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation Children’s National Hospital WashingtonDC United States Sage Bionetworks United States Lab Crestview Radiology Lagos Nigeria McGill University MontrealQC Canada Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Division of Computational Pathology Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine IndianapolisIN United States Department of Neurosurgery The University of Southern California CA United States Department of Radiology Duke University Medical Center DurhamNC United States Mayo Clinic MN United States Center for Global Health Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Informatics Technical University Munich Germany TranslaTUM - Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research Technical University of Munich Germany Cancer Imaging Program National Cancer Institute National Institutes of Health BethesdaMD United States C. S. Mott Children’s Hospital University of Michigan MI United States Biomedical Engineering Rutgers University New BrunswickNJ United States Athinoula A Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging Massachusetts General Hospital BostonMA United States Yale University New HavenCT United States PrecisionFDA U.S. Food and Drug Administration Silver SpringMD United States Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center OH United States Helmholtz AI Helmholtz Munich Germany Department of Radiation Oncology Duke University Medical Center DurhamNC United States Department of Radiology Children’s Health Orange County CA United States Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science Technical University of De

Pediatric tumors of the central nervous system are the most common cause of cancer-related death in children. The five-year survival rate for high-grade gliomas in children is less than 20%. Due to their rarity, the diagnosis of these entities is often delayed, their treatment is mainly based on historic treatment concepts, and clinical trials require multi-institutional collaborations. Here we present the CBTN-CONNECT-DIPGR-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS-PEDs challenge, focused on pediatric brain tumors with data acquired across multiple international consortia dedicated to pediatric neuro-oncology and clinical trials. The CBTN-CONNECT-DIPGR-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS-PEDs challenge brings together clinicians and AI/imaging scientists to lead to faster development of automated segmentation techniques that could benefit clinical trials, and ultimately the care of children with brain tumors. © 2024, CC BY.

关键词： Deep learning

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Evaluating the Accuracy and Reliability of Real-World Digital Mobility Outcomes in Older Adults After Hip Fracture: Cross-Sectional Observational Study

引用

JMIR formative research 2025年 9卷 e67792页

作者： Martin A Berge Anisoara Paraschiv-Ionescu Cameron Kirk Arne Küderle Encarna Micó-Amigo Clemens Becker Andrea Cereatti Silvia Del Din Monika Engdal Judith Garcia-Aymerich Karoline B Grønvik Clint Hansen Jeffrey M Hausdorff Jorunn L Helbostad Carl-Philipp Jansen Lars Gunnar Johnsen Jochen Klenk Sarah Koch Walter Maetzler Dimitrios Megaritis Arne Müller Lynn Rochester Lars Schwickert Kristin Taraldsen Beatrix Vereijken Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim Norway. Laboratory of Movement Analysis and Measurement Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland. Translational and Clinical Research Institute Faculty of Medical Sciences Newcastle University Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom. Machine Learning and Data Analytics Lab Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Erlangen Germany. Geriatric Center Medical Faculty Heidelberg Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany. Department of Geriatrics and Rehabilitation Robert Bosch Hospital Stuttgart Germany. Department of Electronics and Telecommunications Politecnico di Torino Turin Italy. National Institute for Health and Care Research Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre Newcastle University and the Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom. Barcelona Institute for Global Health Barcelona Spain. Department of Medicine and Life Sciences Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona Catalonia Spain. CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública Madrid Spain. Department of Neurology University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein and Kiel University Kiel Germany. Center for the Study of Movement Cognition and Mobility Neurological Institute Tel Aviv Medical Center Tel Aviv Israel. Department of Physical Therapy Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel. Sagol School of Neuroscience Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel. Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center Rush University Medical Center Chicago IL United States. Department of Orthopedic Surgery Rush Medical College Rush University Chicago IL United States. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery St. Olav's Hospital Trondheim Norway. Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry Ulm University Ulm Germany. IB University of Health and Social Sciences Study Centre Stuttgart Stuttgart Ger

BACKGROUND:Algorithms estimating real-world digital mobility outcomes (DMOs) are increasingly validated in healthy adults and various disease cohorts. However, their accuracy and reliability in older adults after hip fracture, who often walk slowly for short durations, is underexplored. OBJECTIVE:This study examined DMO accuracy and reliability in a hip fracture cohort considering walking bout (WB) duration, physical function, days since surgery, and walking aid use. METHODS:In total, 19 community-dwelling participants were real-world monitored for 2.5 hours using a lower back wearable device and a reference system combining inertial modules, distance sensors, and pressure insoles. A total of 6 DMO estimates from 164 WBs from 58% (11/19) of the participants (aged 71-90 years; assessed 32-390 days after surgery; Short Physical Performance Battery [SPPB] scores of 3-12; gait speed range 0.39-1.34 m/s) were assessed against the reference system at the WB and participant level. We stratified by WB duration (all WBs, WBs of >10 seconds, WBs of 10-30 seconds, and WBs of >30 seconds) and lower versus higher SPPB scores and observed whether days since surgery and walking aid use affected DMO accuracy and reliability. RESULTS:Across WBs, walking speed and distance ranged from 0.25 to 1.29 m/s and from 1.7 to 436.5 m, respectively. Estimation of walking speed, cadence, stride duration, number of steps, and distance stratified by WB duration showed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranging from 0.50 to 0.99 and mean relative errors (MREs) from -6.9% to 12.8%. Stride length estimation showed poor reliability, with ICCs ranging from 0.30 to 0.49 and MREs from 6.1% to 13.2%. Walking speed and distance ICCs in the higher-SPPB score group ranged from 0.85 to 0.99, and MREs ranged from -10.1% to -1.7%. In the lower-SPPB score group, walking speed and distance ICCs ranged from 0.17 to 0.99, and MREs ranged from 13.5% to 32.6%. There was no discernible effect of time since su

关键词： active aging cadence digital mobility assessment distance free living gait walking speed wearable device

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Biomedical image analysis competitions: The state of current participation practice

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2022年

作者： Eisenmann, Matthias Reinke, Annika Weru, Vivienn Tizabi, Minu Dietlinde Isensee, Fabian Adler, Tim J. Godau, Patrick Cheplygina, Veronika Kozubek, Michal Maier-Hein, Klaus Jäger, Paul F. Kopp-Schneider, Annette Maier-Hein, Lena Ali, Sharib Gupta, Anubha Kybic, Jan Noble, Alison de Solórzano, Carlos Ortiz Pachade, Samiksha Petitjean, Caroline Sage, Daniel Wei, Donglai Wilden, Elizabeth Alapatt, Deepak Andrearczyk, Vincent Baid, Ujjwal Bakas, Spyridon Balu, Niranjan Bano, Sophia Bawa, Vivek Singh Bernal, Jorge Bodenstedt, Sebastian Casella, Alessandro Choi, Jinwook Commowick, Olivier Daum, Marie Depeursinge, Adrien Dorent, Reuben Egger, Jan Eichhorn, Hannah Engelhardt, Sandy Ganz, Melanie Girard, Gabriel Hansen, Lasse Heinrich, Mattias Heller, Nicholas Hering, Alessa Huaulmé, Arnaud Kim, Hyunjeong Li, Hongwei Bran Landman, Bennett Li, Jianning Ma, Jun Martel, Anne Martín-Isla, Carlos Menze, Bjoern Nwoye, Chinedu Innocent Oreiller, Valentin Padoy, Nicolas Pati, Sarthak Payette, Kelly Sudre, Carole van Wijnen, Kimberlin Vardazaryan, Armine Vercauteren, Tom Wagner, Martin Wang, Chuanbo Yap, Moi Hoon Yu, Zeyun Yuan, Chun Zenk, Maximilian Zia, Aneeq Zimmerer, David Bao, Rina Choi, Chanyeol Cohen, Andrew Dzyubachyk, Oleh Galdran, Adrian Gan, Tianyuan Guo, Tianqi Gupta, Pradyumna Haithami, Mahmood Ho, Edward Jang, Ikbeom Li, Zhili Luo, Zhengbo Lux, Filip Makrogiannis, Sokratis Müller, Dominik Oh, Young-Tack Pang, Subeen Pape, Constantin Polat, Gorkem Reed, Charlotte Rosalie Ryu, Kanghyun Scherr, Tim Thambawita, Vajira Wang, Haoyu Wang, Xinliang Xu, Kele Yeh, Hung Yeo, Doyeob Yuan, Yixuan Zeng, Yan Zhao, Xin Abbing, Julian Adam, Jannes Adluru, Nagesh Agethen, Niklas Ahmed, Salman Al Khalil, Yasmina Alenyà, Mireia Alhoniemi, Esa An, Chengyang Arega, Tewodros Weldebirhan Avisdris, Netanell Aydogan, Dogu Baran Bai, Yingbin Calisto, Maria Baldeon Basaran, Berke Doga Beetz, Marcel Bian, Hao Blansit, Kevin Bloch, Louise Bohnsack, Robert Bosticardo, Sara Breen, Jack Brudfors, Mikael Brüngel, Raphael Cabezas, Mariano Cacciola, Alb Heidelberg Division of Intelligent Medical Systems Germany Heidelberg HI Helmholtz Imaging Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Heidelberg Division of Biostatistics Germany Heidelberg Division of Medical Image Computing Germany Heidelberg HI Applied Vision Lab Germany IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic Heidelberg Interactive Machine Learning Group Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science and Medical Faculty Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany NCT Heidelberg DKFZ University Hospital Heidelberg Germany School of Computing University of Leeds Leeds United Kingdom SBILab Department of ECE IIIT-Delhi India Faculty of Electrical Engineering Czech Technical University Prague Czech Republic Institute of Biomedical Engineering University of Oxford United Kingdom Center for Applied Medical Research Pamplona Spain Shri Guru Gobind Singhji Institute of Engineering and Technology Maharashtra Nanded India Université de Rouen Normandie France Lausanne Switzerland School of Engineering and Applied Science Harvard University United States ICube University of Strasbourg CNRS France Institute of Informatics School of Management HES-SO Valais-Wallis University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland Techno-Pôle 3 Sierre3960 Switzerland Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Lausanne University Hospital Rue du Bugnon 46 LausanneCH-1011 Switzerland University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology University of Washington United States Wellcome EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences University College London London United Kingdom Visual Artificial Intelligence Lab Oxford Brookes University Oxford United Kingdom Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona & Computer Vision Center Spain Dresden Fetscherstraße 74 PF 64 Dresden01307 Germany

The number of international benchmarking competitions is steadily increasing in various fields of machine learning (ML) research and practice. So far, however, little is known about the common practice as well as bottlenecks faced by the community in tackling the research questions posed. To shed light on the status quo of algorithm development in the specific field of biomedical imaging analysis, we designed an international survey that was issued to all participants of challenges conducted in conjunction with the IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021 conferences (80 competitions in total). The survey covered participants' expertise and working environments, their chosen strategies, as well as algorithm characteristics. A median of 72% challenge participants took part in the survey. According to our results, knowledge exchange was the primary incentive (70%) for participation, while the reception of prize money played only a minor role (16%). While a median of 80 working hours was spent on method development, a large portion of participants stated that they did not have enough time for method development (32%). 25% perceived the infrastructure to be a bottleneck. Overall, 94% of all solutions were deep learning-based. Of these, 84% were based on standard architectures. 43% of the respondents reported that the data samples (e.g., images) were too large to be processed at once. This was most commonly addressed by patch-based training (69%), downsampling (37%), and solving 3D analysis tasks as a series of 2D tasks. K-fold cross-validation on the training set was performed by only 37% of the participants and only 50% of the participants performed ensembling based on multiple identical models (61%) or heterogeneous models (39%). 48% of the respondents applied postprocessing steps. © 2022, CC BY.

关键词： Benchmarking

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Scholarly Influence of the Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum eHealth Initiative: Review and Bibliometric Study of the 2012 to 2017 Outcomes

引用

JMIR Research Protocols 2018年第7期7卷 e10961页

作者： Suominen, Hanna Kelly, Liadh Goeuriot, Lorraine Research School of Computer Science College of Engineering and Computer Science The Australian National University Canberra ACT Australia Machine Learning Research Group Data61 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Canberra ACT Australia Faculty of Science and Technology University of Canberra Canberra ACT Australia Department of Future Technologies Faculty of Science and Engineering University of Turku Turku Finland Department of Computer Science Maynooth University Maynooth Co Kildare Ireland Grenoble Informatics Laboratory Université Grenoble Alpes Grenoble France

Background: The eHealth initiative of the Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum (CLEF) has aimed since 2012 to provide researchers working on health text analytics with annual workshops, shared development challenges and tasks, benchmark datasets, and software for processing and evaluation. In 2012, it ran as a scientific workshop with the aim of establishing an evaluation lab, and since 2013, this annual workshop has been supplemented with 3 or more preceding labs each year. An evaluation lab is an activity where the participating individuals or teams’ goal is to solve the same problem, typically using the same dataset in a given time frame. The overall purpose of this initiative is to support patients, their next of kin, clinical staff, health scientists, and health care policy makers in accessing, understanding, using, and authoring health information in a multilingual setting. In the CLEF eHealth 2013 to 2017 installations, the aim was to address patient-centric text processing. From 2015, the scope was also extended to aid both patients’ understanding and clinicians’ authoring of various types of medical content. CLEF eHealth 2017 introduced a new pilot task on technology-assisted reviews (TARs) in empirical medicine in order to support health scientists and health care policymakers’ information access. Objectives: This original research paper reports on the outcomes of the first 6 installations of CLEF eHealth from 2012 to 2017. The focus is on measuring and analyzing the scholarly influence by reviewing CLEF eHealth papers and their citations. Methods: A review and bibliometric study of the CLEF eHealth proceedings, working notes, and author-declared paper extensions were conducted. Citation content analysis was used for the publications and their citations collected from Google Scholar. Results: As many as 718 teams registered their interest in the tasks, leading to 130 teams submitting to the 15 tasks. A total of 184 papers using CLEF eHealth data gen

关键词： Evaluation studies as topic Health records Information extraction Information storage and retrieval Information visualization Patient education as topic Speech recognition Systematic reviews Test-set generation Text classification

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

DESI Strong Lens Foundry I: HST Observations and Modeling with GIGA-Lens

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2025年

作者： Huang, X. Baltasar, S. Ratier-Werbin, N. Storfer, C. Sheu, W. Agarwal, S. Tamargo-Arizmendi, M. Schlegel, D.J. Aguilar, J. Ahlen, S. Aldering, G. Banka, S. BenZvi, S. Bianchi, D. Bolton, A. Brooks, D. Cikota, A. Claybaugh, T. de la Macorra, A. Dey, A. Doel, P. Edelstein, J. Filipp, A. Forero-Romero, J.E. Gaztañaga, E. Gontcho, S.A. Gontcho Gu, A. Gutierrez, G. Honscheid, K. Jullo, E. Juneau, S. Kehoe, R. Kirkby, D. Kisner, T. Kremin, A. Kwon, K.J. Lambert, A. Landriau, M. Lang, D. Le Guillou, L. Liu, J. Meisner, A. Miquel, R. Moustakas, J. Myers, A.D. Perlmutter, S. Pérez-Ràfols, I. Prada, F. Rossi, G. Rubin, D. Sanchez, E. Schubnell, M. Shu, Y. Silver, E. Sprayberry, D. Suzuki, N. Tarlé, G. Weaver, B.A. Zou, H. Department of Physics & Astronomy University of San Francisco San FranciscoCA94117 United States Physics Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 Cyclotron Road BerkeleyCA94720 United States Department of Physics Complutense University of Madrid Madrid28040 Spain Department of Mathematics Complutense University of Madrid Madrid28040 Spain Institute for Astronomy University of Hawai’i HonoluluHI96822-1897 United States Department of Physics & Astronomy University of California Los Angeles Los AngelesCA90095 United States University of Chicago Department of Astronomy ChicagoIL60615 United States Department of Physics & Astronomy University of Pittsburgh PittsburghPA15260 United States Physics Dept. Boston University 590 Commonwealth Avenue BostonMA02215 United States Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences University of California Berkeley BerkeleyCA94720 United States Department of Physics & Astronomy University of Rochester 206 Bausch and Lomb Hall P.O. Box 270171 RochesterNY14627-0171 United States Dipartimento di Fisica "Aldo Pontremoli" Università degli Studi di Milano Via Celoria 16 MilanoI-20133 Italy NSF’s National Optical-Infrared Astronomy Research Laboratory TucsonAZ85719 United States Department of Physics & Astronomy University College London Gower Street LondonWC1E 6BT United Kingdom Gemini Observatory NSF’s NOIRLab Casilla 603 La Serena Chile Instituto de Física Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Circuito de la Investigación Científica Ciudad Universitaria Cd. de MéxicoC. P. 04510 Mexico Space Sciences Laboratory University of California Berkeley 7 Gauss Way BerkeleyCA94720 United States Université de Montréal Physics Department 1375 Av. Thérèse-Lavoie-Roux MontréalQCH2V 0B3 Canada Ciela – Montreal Institute for Astrophysical Data Analysis and Machine Learning 1375 Av. Thérèse-Lavoie-Roux MontréalQCH2V 0B3 Canada Technical University Munich TUM School of Natural Sciences

We present the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Strong Lens Foundry. We discovered ∼ 3500 new strong gravitational lens candidates in the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys using residual neural networks (ResNet). We observed a subset (51) of our candidates using the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). All of them were confirmed to be strong lenses. We also briefly describe spectroscopic follow-up observations by DESI and Keck NIRES programs. From this very rich dataset, a number of studies will be carried out, including evaluating the quality of the ResNet search candidates and lens modeling. In this paper, we present our initial effort in these directions. In particular, as a demonstration, we present the lens model for DESI-165.4754-06.0423, with imaging data from HST, and lens and source redshifts from DESI and Keck NIRES, respectively. In this effort, we have applied a fully forward-modeling Bayesian approach (GIGA-Lens), using multiple GPUs, for the first time in both regards, to a strong lens with HST data, or any high resolution imaging. © 2025, CC BY.

关键词： Dark energy

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：