检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

Npj mental health research 2024年第1期3卷 66页

作者： Misha Sadeghi Robert Richer Bernhard Egger Lena Schindler-Gmelch Lydia Helene Rupp Farnaz Rahimi Matthias Berking Bjoern M Eskofier Machine Learning and Data Analytics Lab (MaD Lab) Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (AIBE) Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) Erlangen 91052 Germany. misha.sadeghi@fau.de. Machine Learning and Data Analytics Lab (MaD Lab) Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (AIBE) Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) Erlangen 91052 Germany. Chair of Visual Computing (LGDV) Department of Computer Science Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) Erlangen 91058 Germany. Chair of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy (KliPs) Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) Erlangen 91052 Germany. Translational Digital Health Group Institute of AI for Health Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health Neuherberg 85764 Germany.

Detecting depression is a critical component of mental health diagnosis, and accurate assessment is essential for effective treatment. This study introduces a novel, fully automated approach to predicting depression severity using the E-DAIC dataset. We employ Large Language Models (LLMs) to extract depression-related indicators from interview transcripts, utilizing the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) score to train the prediction model. Additionally, facial data extracted from video frames is integrated with textual data to create a multimodal model for depression severity prediction. We evaluate three approaches: text-based features, facial features, and a combination of both. Our findings show the best results are achieved by enhancing text data with speech quality assessment, with a mean absolute error of 2.85 and root mean square error of 4.02. This study underscores the potential of automated depression detection, showing text-only models as robust and effective while paving the way for multimodal analysis.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Evaluating the Accuracy and Reliability of Real-World Digital Mobility Outcomes in Older Adults After Hip Fracture: Cross-Sectional Observational Study

引用

JMIR formative research 2025年 9卷 e67792页

作者： Martin A Berge Anisoara Paraschiv-Ionescu Cameron Kirk Arne Küderle Encarna Micó-Amigo Clemens Becker Andrea Cereatti Silvia Del Din Monika Engdal Judith Garcia-Aymerich Karoline B Grønvik Clint Hansen Jeffrey M Hausdorff Jorunn L Helbostad Carl-Philipp Jansen Lars Gunnar Johnsen Jochen Klenk Sarah Koch Walter Maetzler Dimitrios Megaritis Arne Müller Lynn Rochester Lars Schwickert Kristin Taraldsen Beatrix Vereijken Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim Norway. Laboratory of Movement Analysis and Measurement Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland. Translational and Clinical Research Institute Faculty of Medical Sciences Newcastle University Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom. Machine Learning and Data Analytics Lab Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Erlangen Germany. Geriatric Center Medical Faculty Heidelberg Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany. Department of Geriatrics and Rehabilitation Robert Bosch Hospital Stuttgart Germany. Department of Electronics and Telecommunications Politecnico di Torino Turin Italy. National Institute for Health and Care Research Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre Newcastle University and the Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom. Barcelona Institute for Global Health Barcelona Spain. Department of Medicine and Life Sciences Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona Catalonia Spain. CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública Madrid Spain. Department of Neurology University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein and Kiel University Kiel Germany. Center for the Study of Movement Cognition and Mobility Neurological Institute Tel Aviv Medical Center Tel Aviv Israel. Department of Physical Therapy Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel. Sagol School of Neuroscience Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel. Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center Rush University Medical Center Chicago IL United States. Department of Orthopedic Surgery Rush Medical College Rush University Chicago IL United States. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery St. Olav's Hospital Trondheim Norway. Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry Ulm University Ulm Germany. IB University of Health and Social Sciences Study Centre Stuttgart Stuttgart Ger

BACKGROUND:Algorithms estimating real-world digital mobility outcomes (DMOs) are increasingly validated in healthy adults and various disease cohorts. However, their accuracy and reliability in older adults after hip fracture, who often walk slowly for short durations, is underexplored. OBJECTIVE:This study examined DMO accuracy and reliability in a hip fracture cohort considering walking bout (WB) duration, physical function, days since surgery, and walking aid use. METHODS:In total, 19 community-dwelling participants were real-world monitored for 2.5 hours using a lower back wearable device and a reference system combining inertial modules, distance sensors, and pressure insoles. A total of 6 DMO estimates from 164 WBs from 58% (11/19) of the participants (aged 71-90 years; assessed 32-390 days after surgery; Short Physical Performance Battery [SPPB] scores of 3-12; gait speed range 0.39-1.34 m/s) were assessed against the reference system at the WB and participant level. We stratified by WB duration (all WBs, WBs of >10 seconds, WBs of 10-30 seconds, and WBs of >30 seconds) and lower versus higher SPPB scores and observed whether days since surgery and walking aid use affected DMO accuracy and reliability. RESULTS:Across WBs, walking speed and distance ranged from 0.25 to 1.29 m/s and from 1.7 to 436.5 m, respectively. Estimation of walking speed, cadence, stride duration, number of steps, and distance stratified by WB duration showed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranging from 0.50 to 0.99 and mean relative errors (MREs) from -6.9% to 12.8%. Stride length estimation showed poor reliability, with ICCs ranging from 0.30 to 0.49 and MREs from 6.1% to 13.2%. Walking speed and distance ICCs in the higher-SPPB score group ranged from 0.85 to 0.99, and MREs ranged from -10.1% to -1.7%. In the lower-SPPB score group, walking speed and distance ICCs ranged from 0.17 to 0.99, and MREs ranged from 13.5% to 32.6%. There was no discernible effect of time since su

关键词： active aging cadence digital mobility assessment distance free living gait walking speed wearable device

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Complementary App-Based Yoga Home Exercise Therapy for Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis: Usability Study

引用

JMIR Formative Research 2024年 8卷 e57185页

作者： Grube, Lara Petit, Pascal Vuillerme, Nicolas Nitschke, Marlies Nwosu, Obioma Bertrand Knitza, Johannes Krusche, Martin Seifer, Ann-Kristin Eskofier, Bjoern Schett, Georg Morf, Harriet Department of Internal Medicine 3- Rheumatology & Immunology Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Erlangen Germany Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Erlangen Germany AGEIS Université Grenoble Alpes Grenoble France Institut Universitaire de France Paris France LabCom Telecom4Health Orange Labs & Université Grenoble Alpes CNRS Inria Grenoble France Machine Learning and Data Analytics Lab Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (AIBE) Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Erlangen Germany Institute for Digital Medicine University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg Philipps-University Marburg Marburg Germany III. Department of Medicine University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Hamburg Germany Translational Digital Health Group Institute of AI for Health German Research Center for Environmental Health Helmholtz Zentrum München Neuherberg Germany

Background: Axial spondyloarthritis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease characterized by potentially disabling inflammation of the spine and adjacent joints. Regular exercise is a cornerstone of treatment. However, patients with AS currently have little support. YogiTherapy (MaD lab) is an app developed to support patients with AS by providing instructions for yoga-based home exercise therapy. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the usability and acceptance of the newly designed YogiTherapy app for patients with AS. Methods: Patients completed the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS) and net promoter score (NPS) questionnaires after the app introduction. Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney rank sum test, chi-square test for count data, and correlation analysis were conducted to examine the usability of the app, acceptance, and patient characteristics. Results: A total of 65 patients with AS (33, 51% female;age: mean 43.3, SD 13.6 years) were included in the study from May 2022 to June 2023. Subsequently, the data were analyzed. Usability was rated moderate, with a mean uMARS of 3.35 (SD 0.47) points on a scale from 0 to 5. The highest-rated uMARS dimension was information (mean 3.88, SD 0.63), followed by functionality (mean 3.84, SD 0.87). Females reported a significantly higher uMARS total score than males (mean 3.47, SD 0.48 vs mean 3.23, SD 0.45;P=.03, Vargha and Delaney A [VDA] 0.66, 95% CI 0.53-0.77). The mean average of the NPS was 6.23 (SD 2.64) points (on a scale from 0 to 10), based on 43% (26/65 nonpromoters, 42% (25/65) indifferent, and 15% (9/65) promoters. A total of 7% (5/65) of those surveyed did not answer the question. When applying the NPS formula, the result is –26%. The NPS showed a positive correlation with the usage of mobile apps (r=0.39;P=.02). uMARS functionality was significantly higher rated by patients younger than 41 years (mean 4.17, SD 0.55 vs mean 3.54, SD 1;P<.001;VDA 0.69, 95% CI 0.56-0.80). Patients consi

关键词： adjacent joints ankylosing spondylitis app apps axial spondylarthritis chronic correlation analysis DHA digital health application digital therapeutics DTx eHealth exercise home exercise joint joints patient patient acceptance patients physical exercise rheumatic disease self-assessment spine spondyloarthritis therapy usability usability study Yoga YogiTherapy

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Lessons Learned from Assessing Trustworthy AI in Practice

引用

Digital Society 2023年第3期2卷 1-25页

作者： Vetter, Dennis Amann, Julia Bruneault, Frédérick Coffee, Megan Düdder, Boris Gallucci, Alessio Gilbert, Thomas Krendl Hagendorff, Thilo van Halem, Irmhild Hickman, Eleanore Hildt, Elisabeth Holm, Sune Kararigas, Georgios Kringen, Pedro Madai, Vince I. Wiinblad Mathez, Emilie Tithi, Jesmin Jahan Westerlund, Magnus Wurth, Renee Zicari, Roberto V. Computational Vision and Artificial Intelligence Lab Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt Am Main Germany Z-Inspection® Initiative Venice Italy Health Ethics and Policy Lab ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland Strategy and Innovation Careum Foundation Zurich Switzerland Philosophie Departement Collège André-Laurendeau Montréal Canada École Des Médias Université du Québec À Montréal Montréal Canada Department of Medicine Division of Infectious Diseases and Immunology New York University Grossman School of Medicine New York City USA Department of Computer Science University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Digital Life Initiative Cornell Tech New York City USA Cluster of Excellence “Machine Learning: New Perspectives for Science” University of Tuebingen Tuebingen Germany School of Law University of Bristol Bristol UK Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions Illinois Institute of Technology Chicago USA Department of Business Management and Analytics Arcada University of Applied Sciences Helsinki Finland Department of Food & Resource Economics University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Department of Physiology Faculty of Medicine University of Iceland Reykjavik Iceland QUEST Centre for Responsible Research Berlin Institute of Health Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany Faculty of Computing Engineering and the Built Environment School of Computing and Digital Technology Birmingham City University Birmingham UK Parallel Computing Labs Intel Santa Clara USA School of Economics Innovation and Technology Kristiania University College Oslo Norway Data Science Graduate School Seoul National University Seoul South Korea

Building artificial intelligence (AI) systems that adhere to ethical standards is a complex problem. Even though a multitude of guidelines for the design and development of such trustworthy AI systems exist, these guidelines focus on high-level and abstract requirements for AI systems, and it is often very difficult to assess if a specific system fulfills these requirements. The Z-Inspection® process provides a holistic and dynamic framework to evaluate the trustworthiness of specific AI systems at different stages of the AI lifecycle, including intended use, design, and development. It focuses, in particular, on the discussion and identification of ethical issues and tensions through the analysis of socio-technical scenarios and a requirement-based framework for ethical and trustworthy AI. This article is a methodological reflection on the Z-Inspection® process. We illustrate how high-level guidelines for ethical and trustworthy AI can be applied in practice and provide insights for both AI researchers and AI practitioners. We share the lessons learned from conducting a series of independent assessments to evaluate the trustworthiness of real-world AI systems, as well as key recommendations and practical suggestions on how to ensure a rigorous trustworthiness assessment throughout the lifecycle of an AI system. The results presented in this article are based on our assessments of AI systems in the healthcare sector and environmental monitoring, where we used the framework for trustworthy AI proposed in the Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI by the European Commission’s High-Level Expert Group on AI. However, the assessment process and the lessons learned can be adapted to other domains and include additional frameworks.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

The state-of-the-art in Cardiac MRI Reconstruction: Results of the CMRxRecon Challenge in MICCAI 2023

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2024年

作者： Lyu, Jun Qin, Chen Wang, Shuo Wang, Fanwen Li, Yan Wang, Zi Guo, Kunyuan Ouyang, Cheng Tänzer, Michael Liu, Meng Sun, Longyu Sun, Mengting Li, Qin Shi, Zhang Hua, Sha Li, Hao Chen, Zhensen Zhang, Zhenlin Xin, Bingyu Metaxas, Dimitris N. Yiasemis, George Teuwen, Jonas Zhang, Liping Chen, Weitian Pang, Yanwei Liu, Xiaohan Razumov, Artem Dylov, Dmitry V. Dou, Quan Yan, Kang Xue, Yuyang Du, Yuning Dietlmeier, Julia Garcia-Cabrera, Carles Hemidi, Ziad Al-Haj Vogt, Nora Xu, Ziqiang Zhang, Yajing Chu, Ying-Hua Chen, Weibo Bai, Wenjia Zhuang, Xiahai Qin, Jing Wu, Lianmin Yang, Guang Qu, Xiaobo Wang, He Wang, Chengyan Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory Brigham and Women’s Hospital Harvard Medical School 399 Revolution Drive BostonMA02215 United States Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering & I-X Imperial College London United Kingdom Digital Medical Research Center School of Basic Medical Sciences Fudan University Shanghai China Department of Bioengineering & I-X Imperial College London LondonW12 7SL United Kingdom Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit Royal Brompton Hospital Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust LondonSW3 6NP United Kingdom Department of Radiology Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China Department of Electronic Science Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plasma and Magnetic Resonance National Institute for Data Science in Health and Medicine Institute of Artificial Intelligence Xiamen University Xiamen361102 China Department of Computing Department of Brain Sciences Imperial College London LondonSW7 2AZ United Kingdom Human Phenome Institute Fudan University 825 Zhangheng Road Pudong New District Shanghai201203 China Department of Radiology Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University Shanghai China Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Ruijin Hospital Lu Wan Branch Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence Fudan University Shanghai200433 China Department of Computer Science Rutgers University PiscatawayNJ08854 United States AI for Oncology Netherlands Cancer Institute Plesmanlaan 121 Amsterdam1066 CX Netherlands Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong TJK-BIIT Lab School of Electrical and Information Engineering Tianjin University Tianjin300072 China Skolkovo Institute Of Science And Technology Center for Artificial Intelligence Technology 30/1 Bolshoy blvd. Moscow121205 Russia Department of Biomedical Engineering University of Virginia

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides detailed and quantitative evaluation of the heart’s structure, function, and tissue characteristics with high-resolution spatial-temporal imaging. However, its slow imaging speed and motion artifacts are notable limitations. Undersampling reconstruction, especially data-driven algorithms, has emerged as a promising solution to accelerate scans and enhance imaging performance using highly under-sampled data. Nevertheless, the scarcity of publicly available cardiac k-space datasets and evaluation platform hinder the development of data-driven reconstruction algorithms. To address this issue, we organized the Cardiac MRI Reconstruction Challenge (CMRxRecon) in 2023, in collaboration with the 26th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI). CMRxRecon presented an extensive k-space dataset comprising cine and mapping raw data, accompanied by detailed annotations of cardiac anatomical structures. With overwhelming participation, the challenge attracted more than 285 teams and over 600 participants. Among them, 22 teams successfully submitted Docker containers for the testing phase, with 7 teams submitted for both cine and mapping tasks. All teams use deep learning based approaches, indicating that deep learning has predominately become a promising solution for the problem. The first-place winner of both tasks utilizes the E2E-VarNet architecture as backbones. In contrast, U-Net is still the most popular backbone for both multi-coil and single-coil reconstructions. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the challenge design, presents a summary of the submitted results, reviews the employed methods, and offers an in-depth discussion that aims to inspire future advancements in cardiac MRI reconstruction models. The summary emphasizes the effective strategies observed in Cardiac MRI reconstruction, including backbone architecture, loss function, pre-processing techn

关键词： Mapping

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Why is the Winner the Best?

Why is the Winner the Best?

引用

Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

作者： M. Eisenmann A. Reinke V. Weru M. D. Tizabi F. Isensee T. J. Adler S. Ali V. Andrearczyk M. Aubreville U. Baid S. Bakas N. Balu S. Bano J. Bernal S. Bodenstedt A. Casella V. Cheplygina M. Daum M. De Bruijne A. Depeursinge R. Dorent J. Egger D. G. Ellis S. Engelhardt M. Ganz N. Ghatwary G. Girard P. Godau A. Gupta L. Hansen K. Harada M. Heinrich N. Heller A. Hering A. Huaulmé P. Jannin A. E. Kavur O. Kodym M. Kozubek J. Li H. Li J. Ma C. Martín-Isla B. Menze A. Noble V. Oreiller N. Padoy S. Pati K. Payette T. Rädsch J. Rafael-Patiño V. Singh Bawa S. Speidel C. H. Sudre K. Van Wijnen M. Wagner D. Wei A. Yamlahi M. H. Yap C. Yuan M. Zenk A. Zia D. Zimmerer D. Aydogan B. Bhattarai L. Bloch R. Brüngel J. Cho C. Choi Q. Dou I. Ezhov C. M. Friedrich C. Fuller R. R. Gaire A. Galdran Á. García Faura M. Grammatikopoulou S. Hong M. Jahanifar I. Jang A. Kadkhodamohammadi I. Kang F. Kofler S. Kondo H. Kuijf M. Li M. Luu T. Martinčič P. Morais M. A. Naser B. Oliveira D. Owen S. Pang J. Park S. Park S. Płotka E. Puybareau N. Rajpoot K. Ryu N. Saeed A. Shephard P. Shi D. Štepec R. Subedi G. Tochon H. R. Torres H. Urien J. L. Vilaça K. A. Wahid H. Wang J. Wang L. Wang X. Wang B. Wiestler M. Wodzinski F. Xia J. Xie Z. Xiong S. Yang Y. Yang Z. Zhao K. Maier-Hein P. F. Jäger A. Kopp-Schneider L. Maier-Hein Division of Intelligent Medical Systems German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Helmholtz Imaging German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Division of Biostatistics German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Division of Medical Image Computing German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences School of Computing University of Leeds Leeds UK Institute of Informatics School of Management HES-SO Valais-Wallis University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland Sierre Switzerland Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Lausanne University Hospital Lausanne Switzerland Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt Ingolstadt Germany Center for Artificial Intelligence and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D) and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA) University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Radiology University of Washington Seattle WA USA Department of Computer Science Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS) University College London London UK Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona & Computer Vision Center Barcelona Spain Division of Translational Surgical Oncology National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC) Dresden Dresden Germany Department of Advanced Robotics Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia Italy Department of Electronics Information and Bioengineering Politecnico di Milano Milan Italy IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Department of General Visceral and Transplantation Surgery Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany Department of Radiology and Nuc

International benchmarking competitions have become fundamental for the comparative performance assessment of image analysis methods. However, little attention has been given to investigating what can be learnt from these competitions. Do they really generate scientific progress? What are common and successful participation strategies? What makes a solution superior to a competing method? To address this gap in the literature, we performed a multicenter study with all 80 competitions that were conducted in the scope of IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021. Statistical analyses performed based on comprehensive descriptions of the submitted algorithms linked to their rank as well as the underlying participation strategies revealed common characteristics of winning solutions. These typically include the use of multi-task learning (63%) and/or multi-stage pipelines (61%), and a focus on augmentation (100%), image preprocessing (97%), data curation (79%), and post-processing (66%). The “typical” lead of a winning team is a computer scientist with a doctoral degree, five years of experience in biomedical image analysis, and four years of experience in deep learning. Two core general development strategies stood out for highly-ranked teams: the reflection of the metrics in the method design and the focus on analyzing and handling failure cases. According to the organizers, 43% of the winning algorithms exceeded the state of the art but only 11% completely solved the respective domain problem. The insights of our study could help researchers (1) improve algorithm development strategies when approaching new problems, and (2) focus on open research questions revealed by this work.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Identifying the best machine learning algorithms for brain tumor segmentation, progression assessment, and overall survival prediction in the BRATS challenge

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2018年

作者： Bakas, Spyridon Reyes, Mauricio Jakab, Andras Bauer, Stefan Rempfler, Markus Crimi, Alessandro Shinohara, Russell Takeshi Berger, Christoph Ha, Sung Min Rozycki, Martin Prastawa, Marcel Alberts, Esther Lipkova, Jana Freymann, John Kirby, Justin Bilello, Michel Fathallah-Shaykh, Hassan M. Wiest, Roland Kirschke, Jan Wiestler, Benedikt Colen, Rivka Kotrotsou, Aikaterini Lamontagne, Pamela Marcus, Daniel Milchenko, Mikhail Nazeri, Arash Weber, Marc-Andr Mahajan, Abhishek Baid, Ujjwal Gerstner, Elizabeth Kwon, Dongjin Acharya, Gagan Agarwal, Manu Alam, Mahbubul Albiol, Alberto Albiol, Antonio Albiol, Francisco J. Alex, Varghese Allinson, Nigel Amorim, Pedro H.A. Amrutkar, Abhijit Anand, Ganesh Andermatt, Simon Arbel, Tal Arbelaez, Pablo Avery, Aaron Azmat, Muneeza Pranjal, B. Bai, Wenjia Banerjee, Subhashis Barth, Bill Batchelder, Thomas Batmanghelich, Kayhan Battistella, Enzo Beers, Andrew Belyaev, Mikhail Bendszus, Martin Benson, Eze Bernal, Jose Bharath, Halandur Nagaraja Biros, George Bisdas, Sotirios Brown, James Cabezas, Mariano Cao, Shilei Cardoso, Jorge M. Carver, Eric N. Casamitjana, Adri Castillo, Laura Silvana Cat, Marcel Cattin, Philippe Cérigues, Albert Chagas, Vinicius S. Chandra, Siddhartha Chang, Yi-Ju Chang, Shiyu Chang, Ken Chazalon, Joseph Chen, Shengcong Chen, Wei Chen, Jefferson W. Chen, Zhaolin Cheng, Kun Choudhury, Ahana Roy Chylla, Roger Clrigues, Albert Colleman, Steven Colmeiro, Ramiro German Rodriguez Combalia, Marc Costa, Anthony Cui, Xiaomeng Dai, Zhenzhen Dai, Lutao Daza, Laura Alexandra Deutsch, Eric Ding, Changxing Dong, Chao Dong, Shidu Dudzik, Wojciech Eaton-Rosen, Zach Egan, Gary Escudero, Guilherme Estienne, Tho Everson, Richard Fabrizio, Jonathan Fan, Yong Fang, Longwei Feng, Xue Ferrante, Enzo Fidon, Lucas Fischer, Martin French, Andrew P. Fridman, Naomi Fu, Huan Fuentes, David Gao, Yaozong Gates, Evan Gering, David Gholami, Amir Gierke, Willi Glocker, Ben Gong, Mingming Gonzlez-Vill, Sandra Grosges, T. Guan, Yuanfang Guo, Sheng Gupta, Sudeep Han, Woo-Sup Han, Il Song Harmuth, Ko Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics University of Bern Bern Switzerland Center for MR-Research University Children's Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland Support Centre for Advanced Neuroimaging Inselspital Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology Bern University Hospital Bern Switzerland University Hospital of Zurich Zurich Switzerland Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia United States Image-Based Biomedical Modeling Group Technical University of Munich Munich Germany Icahn School of Medicine Mount Sinai Health System New YorkNY United States Leidos Biomedical Research Inc. Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research FrederickMD21701 United States Cancer Imaging Program National Cancer Institute National Institutes of Health BethesdaMD20814 United States Department of Neurology University of Alabama at Birmingham BirminghamAL United States Department of Diagnostic Radiology University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center HoustonTX United States Department of Psychology Washington University St. LouisMO United States Neuroimaging Informatics and Analysis Center Washington University St. LouisMO United States Department of Radiology Washington University St. LouisMO United States Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Pediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology University Medical Center Rostock Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 6 Rostock18057 Germany Tata Memorial Centre Homi Bhabha National Institute Mumbai India Shri Guru Gobind Singhji Institute of Engineering and Technology Nanded India NVIDIA Santa Clara

Gliomas are the most common primary brain malignancies, with different degrees of aggressiveness, variable prognosis and various heterogeneous histologic sub-regions, i.e., peritumoral edematous/invaded tissue, necrotic core, active and non-enhancing core. This intrinsic heterogeneity is also portrayed in their radio-phenotype, as their sub-regions are depicted by varying intensity profiles disseminated across multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) scans, reflecting varying biological properties. Their heterogeneous shape, extent, and location are some of the factors that make these tumors difficult to resect, and in some cases inoperable. The amount of resected tumor is a factor also considered in longitudinal scans, when evaluating the apparent tumor for potential diagnosis of progression. Furthermore, there is mounting evidence that accurate segmentation of the various tumor sub-regions can offer the basis for quantitative image analysis towards prediction of patient overall survival. This study assesses the state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) methods used for brain tumor image analysis in mpMRI scans, during the last seven instances of the International Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge, i.e., 2012-2018. Specifically, we focus on i) evaluating segmentations of the various glioma sub-regions in pre-operative mpMRI scans, ii) assessing potential tumor progression by virtue of longitudinal growth of tumor sub-regions, beyond use of the RECIST/RANO criteria, and iii) predicting the overall survival from pre-operative mpMRI scans of patients that underwent gross total resection. Finally, we investigate the challenge of identifying the best ML algorithms for each of these tasks, considering that apart from being diverse on each instance of the challenge, the multi-institutional mpMRI BraTS dataset has also been a continuously evolving/growing dataset. Copyright © 2018, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Tumors

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Correction: Assessing real-world gait with digital technology? Validation, insights and recommendations from the Mobilise-D consortium

引用

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation 2024年第1期21卷 71页

作者： M Encarna Micó-Amigo Tecla Bonci Anisoara Paraschiv-Ionescu Martin Ullrich Cameron Kirk Abolfazl Soltani Arne Küderle Eran Gazit Francesca Salis Lisa Alcock Kamiar Aminian Clemens Becker Stefano Bertuletti Philip Brown Ellen Buckley Alma Cantu Anne-Elie Carsin Marco Caruso Brian Caulfield Andrea Cereatti Lorenzo Chiari Ilaria D'Ascanio Bjoern Eskofier Sara Fernstad Marcel Froehlich Judith Garcia-Aymerich Clint Hansen Jeffrey M Hausdorff Hugo Hiden Emily Hume Alison Keogh Felix Kluge Sarah Koch Walter Maetzler Dimitrios Megaritis Arne Mueller Martijn Niessen Luca Palmerini Lars Schwickert Kirsty Scott Basil Sharrack Henrik Sillén David Singleton Beatrix Vereijken Ioannis Vogiatzis Alison J Yarnall Lynn Rochester Claudia Mazzà Silvia Del Din Translational and Clinical Research Institute Faculty of Medical Sciences Newcastle University Newcastle Upon Tyne UK. Department of Mechanical Engineering and Insigneo Institute for in Silico Medicine The University of Sheffield Sheffield UK. Laboratory of Movement Analysis and Measurement Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland. Machine Learning and Data Analytics Lab Department of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen Nürnberg Erlangen Germany. Center for the Study of Movement Cognition and Mobility Neurological Institute Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center Tel Aviv Israel. Department of Biomedical Sciences University of Sassari Sassari Italy. Department of Electronics and Telecommunications Politecnico di Torino Turin Italy. National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) Newcastle University and The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Newcastle Upon Tyne UK. Robert Bosch Gesellschaft für Medizinische Forschung Stuttgart Germany. The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Newcastle Upon Tyne UK. School of Computing Newcastle University Newcastle Upon Tyne UK. Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal) Barcelona Spain. Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona Catalonia Spain. CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP) Madrid Spain. Insight Centre for Data Analytics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland. School of Public Health Physiotherapy and Sports Science University College Dublin Dublin Ireland. Department of Electrical Electronic and Information Engineering «Guglielmo Marconi» University of Bologna Bologna Italy. Health Sciences and Technologies-Interdepartmental Center for Industrial Research (CIRI-SDV) University of Bologna Bologna Italy. Grünenthal GmbH Aachen Germany. Department of Neurology University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel Kiel Germany. Sagol School of Neuroscien

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Biomedical image analysis competitions: The state of current participation practice

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2022年

作者： Eisenmann, Matthias Reinke, Annika Weru, Vivienn Tizabi, Minu Dietlinde Isensee, Fabian Adler, Tim J. Godau, Patrick Cheplygina, Veronika Kozubek, Michal Maier-Hein, Klaus Jäger, Paul F. Kopp-Schneider, Annette Maier-Hein, Lena Ali, Sharib Gupta, Anubha Kybic, Jan Noble, Alison de Solórzano, Carlos Ortiz Pachade, Samiksha Petitjean, Caroline Sage, Daniel Wei, Donglai Wilden, Elizabeth Alapatt, Deepak Andrearczyk, Vincent Baid, Ujjwal Bakas, Spyridon Balu, Niranjan Bano, Sophia Bawa, Vivek Singh Bernal, Jorge Bodenstedt, Sebastian Casella, Alessandro Choi, Jinwook Commowick, Olivier Daum, Marie Depeursinge, Adrien Dorent, Reuben Egger, Jan Eichhorn, Hannah Engelhardt, Sandy Ganz, Melanie Girard, Gabriel Hansen, Lasse Heinrich, Mattias Heller, Nicholas Hering, Alessa Huaulmé, Arnaud Kim, Hyunjeong Li, Hongwei Bran Landman, Bennett Li, Jianning Ma, Jun Martel, Anne Martín-Isla, Carlos Menze, Bjoern Nwoye, Chinedu Innocent Oreiller, Valentin Padoy, Nicolas Pati, Sarthak Payette, Kelly Sudre, Carole van Wijnen, Kimberlin Vardazaryan, Armine Vercauteren, Tom Wagner, Martin Wang, Chuanbo Yap, Moi Hoon Yu, Zeyun Yuan, Chun Zenk, Maximilian Zia, Aneeq Zimmerer, David Bao, Rina Choi, Chanyeol Cohen, Andrew Dzyubachyk, Oleh Galdran, Adrian Gan, Tianyuan Guo, Tianqi Gupta, Pradyumna Haithami, Mahmood Ho, Edward Jang, Ikbeom Li, Zhili Luo, Zhengbo Lux, Filip Makrogiannis, Sokratis Müller, Dominik Oh, Young-Tack Pang, Subeen Pape, Constantin Polat, Gorkem Reed, Charlotte Rosalie Ryu, Kanghyun Scherr, Tim Thambawita, Vajira Wang, Haoyu Wang, Xinliang Xu, Kele Yeh, Hung Yeo, Doyeob Yuan, Yixuan Zeng, Yan Zhao, Xin Abbing, Julian Adam, Jannes Adluru, Nagesh Agethen, Niklas Ahmed, Salman Al Khalil, Yasmina Alenyà, Mireia Alhoniemi, Esa An, Chengyang Arega, Tewodros Weldebirhan Avisdris, Netanell Aydogan, Dogu Baran Bai, Yingbin Calisto, Maria Baldeon Basaran, Berke Doga Beetz, Marcel Bian, Hao Blansit, Kevin Bloch, Louise Bohnsack, Robert Bosticardo, Sara Breen, Jack Brudfors, Mikael Brüngel, Raphael Cabezas, Mariano Cacciola, Alb Heidelberg Division of Intelligent Medical Systems Germany Heidelberg HI Helmholtz Imaging Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Heidelberg Division of Biostatistics Germany Heidelberg Division of Medical Image Computing Germany Heidelberg HI Applied Vision Lab Germany IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic Heidelberg Interactive Machine Learning Group Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science and Medical Faculty Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany NCT Heidelberg DKFZ University Hospital Heidelberg Germany School of Computing University of Leeds Leeds United Kingdom SBILab Department of ECE IIIT-Delhi India Faculty of Electrical Engineering Czech Technical University Prague Czech Republic Institute of Biomedical Engineering University of Oxford United Kingdom Center for Applied Medical Research Pamplona Spain Shri Guru Gobind Singhji Institute of Engineering and Technology Maharashtra Nanded India Université de Rouen Normandie France Lausanne Switzerland School of Engineering and Applied Science Harvard University United States ICube University of Strasbourg CNRS France Institute of Informatics School of Management HES-SO Valais-Wallis University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland Techno-Pôle 3 Sierre3960 Switzerland Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Lausanne University Hospital Rue du Bugnon 46 LausanneCH-1011 Switzerland University of Pennsylvania PhiladelphiaPA United States Department of Radiology University of Washington United States Wellcome EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences University College London London United Kingdom Visual Artificial Intelligence Lab Oxford Brookes University Oxford United Kingdom Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona & Computer Vision Center Spain Dresden Fetscherstraße 74 PF 64 Dresden01307 Germany

The number of international benchmarking competitions is steadily increasing in various fields of machine learning (ML) research and practice. So far, however, little is known about the common practice as well as bottlenecks faced by the community in tackling the research questions posed. To shed light on the status quo of algorithm development in the specific field of biomedical imaging analysis, we designed an international survey that was issued to all participants of challenges conducted in conjunction with the IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021 conferences (80 competitions in total). The survey covered participants' expertise and working environments, their chosen strategies, as well as algorithm characteristics. A median of 72% challenge participants took part in the survey. According to our results, knowledge exchange was the primary incentive (70%) for participation, while the reception of prize money played only a minor role (16%). While a median of 80 working hours was spent on method development, a large portion of participants stated that they did not have enough time for method development (32%). 25% perceived the infrastructure to be a bottleneck. Overall, 94% of all solutions were deep learning-based. Of these, 84% were based on standard architectures. 43% of the respondents reported that the data samples (e.g., images) were too large to be processed at once. This was most commonly addressed by patch-based training (69%), downsampling (37%), and solving 3D analysis tasks as a series of 2D tasks. K-fold cross-validation on the training set was performed by only 37% of the participants and only 50% of the participants performed ensembling based on multiple identical models (61%) or heterogeneous models (39%). 48% of the respondents applied postprocessing steps. © 2022, CC BY.

关键词： Benchmarking

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：