检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

Overview of the Tenth Dialog System technology Challenge: DSTC10

IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and language Processing 2024年 32卷 765-778页

作者： Yoshino, Koichiro Chen, Yun-Nung Crook, Paul Kottur, Satwik Li, Jinchao Hedayatnia, Behnam Moon, Seungwhan Fei, Zhengcong Li, Zekang Zhang, Jinchao Feng, Yang Zhou, Jie Kim, Seokhwan Liu, Yang Jin, Di Papangelis, Alexandros Gopalakrishnan, Karthik Hakkani-Tur, Dilek Damavandi, Babak Geramifard, Alborz Hori, Chiori Shah, Ankit Zhang, Chen Li, Haizhou Sedoc, Joao D'haro, Luis F. Banchs, Rafael Rudnicky, Alexander Guardian Robot Project R-IH RIKEN 2-2-2 Hikaridai Seika Shoraku619-0288 Japan Information Science Nara Institute of Science and Technology Ikoma630-0101 Japan Computer Science and Information Engineering National Taiwan University Taipei10617 Taiwan Inc. Palo AltoCA95054 United States Alexa AI *** Inc. SunnyvaleCA94089 United States Meta Seattle RedmondWA98052 United States Institute of Computing Technology Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing100190 China Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing Institute of Computing Technology Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing100190 China Tencent AI Lab Beijing Beijing China Kexueyuan South Road Zhongguancun Beijing100190 China Beijing 100190 China Alexa AI *** Inc. SunnyvaleCA United States 1120 Enterprise way Sunnyvale94089 United States *** Inc. SeattleWA United States Menlo Park CA United States Audio and Speech Group Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories CambridgeMA02139-1955 United States Carnegie Mellon University Department of Language and Information Technologies or just Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh United States National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore Shenzhen Research Institute of Big Data School of Data Science Chinese University of Hong Kong Shenzhen518172 China New York University New YorkNY United States ETSI de Telecomunicacion - Speech Technology and Machine Learning Group Universidad Politecnica de Madrid Ciudad Universitaria Madrid28040 Spain Nanyang Technological University Singapore Singapore Carnegie Mellon University PittsburghPA United States

This article introduces the Tenth Dialog System technology Challenge (DSTC-10). This edition of the DSTC focuses on applying end-to-end dialog technologies for five distinct tasks in dialog systems, namely 1. Incorporation of Meme images into open domain dialogs, 2. Knowledge-grounded Task-oriented Dialogue Modeling on Spoken Conversations, 3. Situated Interactive Multimodal dialogs, 4. Reasoning for Audio Visual Scene-Aware Dialog, and 5. Automatic Evaluation and Moderation of Open-domainDialogue Systems. This article describes the task definition, provided datasets, baselines, and evaluation setup for each track. We also summarize the results of the submitted systems to highlight the general trends of the state-of-the-art technologies for the tasks. © 2023 The Authors.

关键词： Job analysis

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

A Q-learning-based smart clustering routing method in flying Ad Hoc networks

引用

Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences 2024年第1期36卷

作者： Hosseinzadeh, Mehdi Tanveer, Jawad Rahmani, Amir Masoud Aurangzeb, Khursheed Yousefpoor, Efat Yousefpoor, Mohammad Sadegh Darwesh, Aso Lee, Sang-Woong Fazlali, Mahmood Institute of Research and Development Duy Tan University Da Nang Viet Nam School of Medicine and Pharmacy Duy Tan University Da Nang Viet Nam Department of Computer Science and Engineering Sejong University Seoul 05006 South Korea Future Technology Research Center National Yunlin University of Science and Technology Yunlin Taiwan Department of Computer Engineering College of Computer and Information Sciences King Saud University P.O. Box 51178 Riyadh 11543 Saudi Arabia Department of Computer Engineering Dezful Branch Islamic Azad University Dezful Iran Department of Information Technology University of Human Development Sulaymaniyah Iraq Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning Lab Gachon University 1342 Seongnamdaero Sujeonggu Seongnam 13120 South Korea Cybersecurity and Computing Systems Research Group School of Physics Engineering and Computer Science University of Hertfordshire Hertfordshire AL10 9AB United Kingdom

Flying ad hoc networks (FANETs) have particular importance in various military and civilian applications due to their specific features, including frequent topological changes, the movement of drones in a three-dimensional space, and their restricted energy. These features have created challenges for designing cluster-based routing protocols. In this paper, a Q-learning-based smart clustering routing method (QSCR) is suggested in FANETs. In QSCR, each node discovers its neighbors through the periodic exchange of hello messages. The hello time interval is different in each cluster, and cluster leaders determine this interval based on the average speed similarity. Next, an adaptive clustering process is presented for categorizing drones in the clusters. In this step, the cluster leader is selected based on a new parameter called merit value, which includes residual energy, centrality, neighbor degree, speed similarity, and link validity time. Then, a centralized Q-learning model is presented to tune weight coefficients related to merit parameters dynamically. In the last step, the routing process is done using a greedy forwarding technique. Finally, QSCR is run on NS2, and the simulation results of QSCR are compared with those of ICRA, WCA, and DCA. These results show that QSCR carries out the clustering process rapidly but has less cluster stability than ICRA. QSCR gets energy efficiency and improves network lifetime. In the routing process, QSCR has a high packet delivery rate compared to other schemes. Also, the number of isolated clusters created in QSCR is less than other clustering methods. However, the proposed scheme has a higher end-to-end delay than ICRA. Also, this scheme experiences more communication overhead than ICRA slightly. © 2024 The Author(s)

关键词： Clustering Flying ad hoc networks (FANETs) machine learning (ML) Reinforcement learning (RL) Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Music, Computing, and Health: A Roadmap for the Current and Future Roles of Music technology for Health Care and Well-Being

引用

Music and Science 2021年 4卷

作者： Agres, Kat R. Schaefer, Rebecca S. Volk, Anja van Hooren, Susan Holzapfel, Andre Dalla Bella, Simone Müller, Meinard de Witte, Martina Herremans, Dorien Ramirez Melendez, Rafael Neerincx, Mark Ruiz, Sebastian Meredith, David Dimitriadis, Theo Magee, Wendy L. Yong Siew Toh Conservatory of Music National University of Singapore Singapore Social and Cognitive Computing Department Institute of High Performance Computing A*STAR Singapore Institute for Psychology Health Medical Neuropsychology Unit Leiden University Leiden Netherlands Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition Leiden University Leiden Netherlands Academy of Creative and Performing Arts Leiden University Leiden Netherlands Department of Information and Computing Sciences Utrecht University Utrecht Netherlands Faculty of Health care Department of Arts Therapies Zuyd University of Applied Sciences Heerlen Netherlands KenVaK Research Centre for the Arts Therapies and Psychomotricity Heerlen Netherlands Faculty of Psychology Open University of The Netherlands Heerlen Netherlands Division of Media Technology and Interaction Design KTH Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm Sweden International Laboratory for Brain Music and Sound Research (BRAMS) Outremont QC Canada Department of Psychology University of Montreal Montreal QC Canada Centre for Research on Brain Language and Music (CRBLM) Montreal QC Canada University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw Warsaw Poland International Audio Laboratories Erlangen Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Erlangen Germany HAN University of Applied Sciences Department of Arts Therapies and Psychological Studies Nijmegen Netherlands University of Amsterdam Research Institute of Child Development and Education Amsterdam Netherlands Treatment Centre for People with Mild Intellectual Disabilities and Psychiatric and Behavioral Disorders Gennep Netherlands Information Systems Technology and Design Singapore University of Technology and Design Singapore Music and Machine Learning Lab Music Technology Group Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona Spain Faculty of EEMCS Interactive Intelligence Group Delft University of Technology Delft Netherlands Centre for Digital Music School of Electronic Engineerin

The fields of music, health, and technology have seen significant interactions in recent years in developing music technology for health care and well-being. In an effort to strengthen the collaboration between the involved disciplines, the workshop “Music, Computing, and Health” was held to discuss best practices and state-of-the-art at the intersection of these areas with researchers from music psychology and neuroscience, music therapy, music information retrieval, music technology, medical technology (medtech), and robotics. Following the discussions at the workshop, this article provides an overview of the different methods of the involved disciplines and their potential contributions to developing music technology for health and well-being. Furthermore, the article summarizes the state of the art in music technology that can be applied in various health scenarios and provides a perspective on challenges and opportunities for developing music technology that (1) supports person-centered care and evidence-based treatments, and (2) contributes to developing standardized, large-scale research on music-based interventions in an interdisciplinary manner. The article provides a resource for those seeking to engage in interdisciplinary research using music-based computational methods to develop technology for health care, and aims to inspire future research directions by evaluating the state of the art with respect to the challenges facing each field. © The Author(s) 2021.

关键词： health care interdisciplinarity MedTech music information retrieval (MIR) music neuroscience Music psychology music technology music therapy well-being

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Risk-based decision making: estimands for sequential prediction under interventions

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2023年

作者： Luijken, Kim Morzywolek, Pawel van Amsterdam, Wouter Cinà, Giovanni Hoogland, Jeroen Keogh, Ruth Krijthe, Jesse Magliacane, Sara van Ommen, Thijs Peek, Niels Putter, Hein van Smeden, Maarten Sperrin, Matthew Wang, Junfeng Weir, Daniala Didelez, Vanessa van Geloven, Nan Department of Epidemiology Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht Netherlands Department of Applied Mathematics Computer Science and Statistics Ghent University Ghent Belgium Department of Statistics University of Washington Seattle United States Department of Medical Informatics Amsterdam University Medical Centers Amsterdam Netherlands Institute for Logic Language and Computation University of Amsterdam Amsterdam Netherlands Pacmed Amsterdam Netherlands Department of Epidemiology and Data Science Amsterdam University Medical Centers Amsterdam Netherlands Department of Medical Statistics London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Keppel Street London United Kingdom Pattern Recognition and Bio-Informatics Group EEMCS Delft University of Technology Delft Netherlands Amsterdam Machine Learning Lab University of Amsterdam Amsterdam Netherlands Department of Information and Computing Sciences Utrecht University Utrecht Netherlands Division of Informatics Imaging and Data Science Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health University of Manchester Manchester Academic Health Science Centre Manchester United Kingdom Department of Biomedical Data Sciences Leiden University Medical Center Leiden Netherlands Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences Utrecht University Utrecht Netherlands Department of Biometry and Data Management Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research Epidemiology - BIPS Bremen Germany Faculty of Mathematics/Computer Science University of Bremen Bremen Germany

Prediction models are used amongst others to inform medical decisions on interventions. Typically, individuals with high risks of adverse outcomes are advised to undergo an intervention while those at low risk are advised to refrain from it. Standard prediction models do not always provide risks that are relevant to inform such decisions: e.g., an individual may be estimated to be at low risk because similar individuals in the past received an intervention which lowered their risk. Therefore, prediction models supporting decisions should target risks belonging to defined intervention strategies. Previous works on prediction under interventions assumed that the prediction model was used only at one time point to make an intervention decision. In clinical practice, intervention decisions are rarely made only once: they might be repeated, deferred and re-evaluated. This requires estimated risks under interventions that can be reconsidered at several potential decision moments. In the current work, we highlight key considerations for formulating estimands in sequential prediction under interventions that can inform such intervention decisions. We illustrate these considerations by giving examples of estimands for a case study about choosing between vaginal delivery and cesarean section for women giving birth. Our formalization of prediction tasks in a sequential, causal, and estimand context provides guidance for future studies to ensure that the right question is answered and appropriate causal estimation approaches are chosen to develop sequential prediction models that can inform intervention decisions. © 2023, CC BY.

关键词： Forecasting

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline

引用

Behavior research methods 2023年第1期55卷 364-416页

作者： Kenneth Holmqvist Saga Lee Örbom Ignace T C Hooge Diederick C Niehorster Robert G Alexander Richard Andersson Jeroen S Benjamins Pieter Blignaut Anne-Marie Brouwer Lewis L Chuang Kirsten A Dalrymple Denis Drieghe Matt J Dunn Ulrich Ettinger Susann Fiedler Tom Foulsham Jos N van der Geest Dan Witzner Hansen Samuel B Hutton Enkelejda Kasneci Alan Kingstone Paul C Knox Ellen M Kok Helena Lee Joy Yeonjoo Lee Jukka M Leppänen Stephen Macknik Päivi Majaranta Susana Martinez-Conde Antje Nuthmann Marcus Nyström Jacob L Orquin Jorge Otero-Millan Soon Young Park Stanislav Popelka Frank Proudlock Frank Renkewitz Austin Roorda Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck Bonita Sharif Frederick Shic Mark Shovman Mervyn G Thomas Ward Venrooij Raimondas Zemblys Roy S Hessels Department of Psychology Nicolaus Copernicus University Torun Poland. kenneth.holmqvist@ur.de. Department of Computer Science and Informatics University of the Free State Bloemfontein South Africa. kenneth.holmqvist@ur.de. Department of Psychology Regensburg University Regensburg Germany. kenneth.holmqvist@ur.de. Department of Psychology Regensburg University Regensburg Germany. Experimental Psychology Helmholtz Institute Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands. Lund University Humanities Lab and Department of Psychology Lund University Lund Sweden. Department of Ophthalmology SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University Brooklyn NY USA. Tobii Pro AB Danderyd Sweden. Social Health and Organizational Psychology Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands. Department of Computer Science and Informatics University of the Free State Bloemfontein South Africa. TNO Soesterberg The Netherlands. Department of Ergonomics Leibniz Institute for Working Environments and Human Factors Dortmund Germany. Institute of Informatics LMU Munich Munich Germany. Institute of Child Development University of Minnesota Minneapolis USA. School of Psychology University of Southampton Southampton UK. School of Optometry and Vision Sciences Cardiff University Cardiff UK. Department of Psychology University of Bonn Bonn Germany. Vienna University of Economics and Business Vienna Austria. Department of Psychology University of Essex Essex UK. Department of Neuroscience Erasmus MC Rotterdam The Netherlands. Machine Learning Group Department of Computer Science IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark. SR Research Ltd Ottawa Canada. Human-Computer Interaction University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany. University of British Columbia Columbia Canada. Department of Eye and Vision Science Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences University of Liverpool Liverpool UK. Department of Education and Pedagogy Division Education Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences Ut

In this paper, we present a review of how the various aspects of any study using an eye tracker (such as the instrument, methodology, environment, participant, etc.) affect the quality of the recorded eye-tracking data and the obtained eye-movement and gaze measures. We take this review to represent the empirical foundation for reporting guidelines of any study involving an eye tracker. We compare this empirical foundation to five existing reporting guidelines and to a database of 207 published eye-tracking studies. We find that reporting guidelines vary substantially and do not match with actual reporting practices. We end by deriving a minimal, flexible reporting guideline based on empirical research (Section "An empirically based minimal reporting guideline").

关键词： Data quality Eye movements Eye tracking Replicability Reporting guidelines Reporting practices Reporting standards Reproducibility

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

QUBIQ: Uncertainty Quantification for Biomedical Image Segmentation Challenge

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2024年

作者： Li, Hongwei Bran Navarro, Fernando Ezhov, Ivan Bayat, Amirhossein Das, Dhritiman Kofler, Florian Shit, Suprosanna Waldmannstetter, Diana Paetzold, Johannes C. Hu, Xiaobin Wiestler, Benedikt Zimmer, Lucas Amiranashvili, Tamaz Prabhakar, Chinmay Berger, Christoph Weidner, Jonas Alonso-Basanta, Michelle Rashid, Arif Baid, Ujjwal Adel, Wesam Alis, Deniz Baheti, Bhakti Bai, Yingbin Bhat, Ishaan Cetindag, Sabri Can Chen, Wenting Cheng, Li Dutande, Prasad Dular, Lara Elattar, Mustafa A. Feng, Ming Gao, Shengbo Huisman, Henkjan Hu, Weifeng Innani, Shubham Ji, Wei Karimi, Davood Kuijf, Hugo J. Kwak, Jin Tae Le, Hoang Long Li, Xiang Lin, Huiyan Liu, Tongliang Ma, Jun Ma, Kai Ma, Ting Oksuz, Ilkay Holland, Robbie Oliveira, Arlindo L. Pal, Jimut Bahan Pei, Xuan Qiao, Maoying Saha, Anindo Selvan, Raghavendra Shen, Linlin Silva, Joao Lourenco Spiclin, Ziga Talbar, Sanjay Wang, Dadong Wang, Wei Wang, Xiong Wang, Yin Xi, Ruiling Xu, Kele Yang, Yanwu Yergin, Mert Yu, Shuang Zeng, Lingxi Zhang, YingLin Zhao, Jiachen Zheng, Yefeng Zukovec, Martin Do, Richard Becker, Anton Simpson, Amber Konukoglu, Ender Jakab, Andras Bakas, Spyridon Joskowicz, Leo Menze, Bjoern Department of Informatics Technical University of Munich Germany Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School United States Department of Quantitative Biomedicine University of Zurich Switzerland University Children’s Hospital Zurich University of Zurich Switzerland Department of Radioncology and Radiation Theraphy Klinikum rechts der Isar Technical University of Munich Germany Department of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering ETH-Zurich Switzerland Department of Radiology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York City United States Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences Queen’s University Canada TranslaTUM - Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research Technical University of Munich Germany McGovern Institute Massachusetts Institute of Technology United States Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unveristy Zurich Hospital Switzerland BioMedIA Imperial College London United Kingdom Department of Radiation Oncology University of Pennsylvania PA United States University of Pennsylvania PA United States Department of Radiation Oncology Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University Georgia United States Nile University Cairo Egypt Department of Medical Sciences Acibadem University Istanbul Turkey Shri Guru Gobind Singhji Institute of Engineering and Technology Maharashtra Nanded India Trustworthy Machine Learning Lab University of Sydney Australia Image Sciences Institute University Medical Center Utrecht Netherlands Computer Engineering Department Istanbul Technical University Istanbul Turkey School of Computer Science Shenzhen University Shenzhen China University of Alberta United States University of Ljubljana Faculty of Electrical Engineering Ljubljana Slovenia Tongji University Shanghai China OPPO Research Institute Shanghai China School of Biological and Medical Engineering Beihang University Beijing China Harvard Medical School Boston

Uncertainty in medical image segmentation tasks, especially inter-rater variability, arising from differences in interpretations and annotations by various experts, presents a significant challenge in achieving consistent and reliable image segmentation. This variability not only reflects the inherent complexity and subjective nature of medical image interpretation but also directly impacts the development and evaluation of automated segmentation algorithms. Accurately modeling and quantifying this variability is essential for enhancing the robustness and clinical applicability of these algorithms. We report the set-up and summarize the benchmark results of the Quantification of Uncertainties in Biomedical Image Quantification Challenge (QUBIQ), which was organized in conjunction with International Conferences on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2020 and 2021. The challenge focuses on the uncertainty quantification of medical image segmentation which considers the omnipresence of inter-rater variability in imaging datasets. The large collection of images with multi-rater annotations features various modalities such as MRI and CT;various organs such as the brain, prostate, kidney, and pancreas;and different image dimensions 2D-vs-3D. A total of 24 teams submitted different solutions to the problem, combining various baseline models, Bayesian neural networks, and ensemble model techniques. The obtained results indicate the importance of the ensemble models, as well as the need for further research to develop efficient 3D methods for uncertainty quantification methods in 3D segmentation tasks. © 2024, CC BY-NC-ND.

关键词： Image segmentation

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Why is the Winner the Best?

Why is the Winner the Best?

引用

Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

作者： M. Eisenmann A. Reinke V. Weru M. D. Tizabi F. Isensee T. J. Adler S. Ali V. Andrearczyk M. Aubreville U. Baid S. Bakas N. Balu S. Bano J. Bernal S. Bodenstedt A. Casella V. Cheplygina M. Daum M. De Bruijne A. Depeursinge R. Dorent J. Egger D. G. Ellis S. Engelhardt M. Ganz N. Ghatwary G. Girard P. Godau A. Gupta L. Hansen K. Harada M. Heinrich N. Heller A. Hering A. Huaulmé P. Jannin A. E. Kavur O. Kodym M. Kozubek J. Li H. Li J. Ma C. Martín-Isla B. Menze A. Noble V. Oreiller N. Padoy S. Pati K. Payette T. Rädsch J. Rafael-Patiño V. Singh Bawa S. Speidel C. H. Sudre K. Van Wijnen M. Wagner D. Wei A. Yamlahi M. H. Yap C. Yuan M. Zenk A. Zia D. Zimmerer D. Aydogan B. Bhattarai L. Bloch R. Brüngel J. Cho C. Choi Q. Dou I. Ezhov C. M. Friedrich C. Fuller R. R. Gaire A. Galdran Á. García Faura M. Grammatikopoulou S. Hong M. Jahanifar I. Jang A. Kadkhodamohammadi I. Kang F. Kofler S. Kondo H. Kuijf M. Li M. Luu T. Martinčič P. Morais M. A. Naser B. Oliveira D. Owen S. Pang J. Park S. Park S. Płotka E. Puybareau N. Rajpoot K. Ryu N. Saeed A. Shephard P. Shi D. Štepec R. Subedi G. Tochon H. R. Torres H. Urien J. L. Vilaça K. A. Wahid H. Wang J. Wang L. Wang X. Wang B. Wiestler M. Wodzinski F. Xia J. Xie Z. Xiong S. Yang Y. Yang Z. Zhao K. Maier-Hein P. F. Jäger A. Kopp-Schneider L. Maier-Hein Division of Intelligent Medical Systems German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Helmholtz Imaging German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Division of Biostatistics German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Division of Medical Image Computing German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences School of Computing University of Leeds Leeds UK Institute of Informatics School of Management HES-SO Valais-Wallis University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland Sierre Switzerland Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Lausanne University Hospital Lausanne Switzerland Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt Ingolstadt Germany Center for Artificial Intelligence and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D) and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA) University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Radiology University of Washington Seattle WA USA Department of Computer Science Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS) University College London London UK Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona & Computer Vision Center Barcelona Spain Division of Translational Surgical Oncology National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC) Dresden Dresden Germany Department of Advanced Robotics Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia Italy Department of Electronics Information and Bioengineering Politecnico di Milano Milan Italy IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Department of General Visceral and Transplantation Surgery Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany Department of Radiology and Nuc

International benchmarking competitions have become fundamental for the comparative performance assessment of image analysis methods. However, little attention has been given to investigating what can be learnt from these competitions. Do they really generate scientific progress? What are common and successful participation strategies? What makes a solution superior to a competing method? To address this gap in the literature, we performed a multicenter study with all 80 competitions that were conducted in the scope of IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021. Statistical analyses performed based on comprehensive descriptions of the submitted algorithms linked to their rank as well as the underlying participation strategies revealed common characteristics of winning solutions. These typically include the use of multi-task learning (63%) and/or multi-stage pipelines (61%), and a focus on augmentation (100%), image preprocessing (97%), data curation (79%), and post-processing (66%). The “typical” lead of a winning team is a computer scientist with a doctoral degree, five years of experience in biomedical image analysis, and four years of experience in deep learning. Two core general development strategies stood out for highly-ranked teams: the reflection of the metrics in the method design and the focus on analyzing and handling failure cases. According to the organizers, 43% of the winning algorithms exceeded the state of the art but only 11% completely solved the respective domain problem. The insights of our study could help researchers (1) improve algorithm development strategies when approaching new problems, and (2) focus on open research questions revealed by this work.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Author Correction: π-HuB: the proteomic navigator of the human body

引用

Nature 2025年第8046期637卷 E22页

作者： Fuchu He Ruedi Aebersold Mark S Baker Xiuwu Bian Xiaochen Bo Daniel W Chan Cheng Chang Luonan Chen Xiangmei Chen Yu-Ju Chen Heping Cheng Ben C Collins Fernando Corrales Jürgen Cox Weinan E Jennifer E Van Eyk Jia Fan Pouya Faridi Daniel Figeys George Fu Gao Wen Gao Zu-Hua Gao Keisuke Goda Wilson Wen Bin Goh Dongfeng Gu Changjiang Guo Tiannan Guo Yuezhong He Albert J R Heck Henning Hermjakob Tony Hunter Narayanan Gopalakrishna Iyer Ying Jiang Connie R Jimenez Lokesh Joshi Neil L Kelleher Ming Li Yang Li Qingsong Lin Cui Hua Liu Fan Liu Guang-Hui Liu Yansheng Liu Zhihua Liu Teck Yew Low Ben Lu Matthias Mann Anming Meng Robert L Moritz Edouard Nice Guang Ning Gilbert S Omenn Christopher M Overall Giuseppe Palmisano Yaojin Peng Charles Pineau Terence Chuen Wai Poon Anthony W Purcell Jie Qiao Roger R Reddel Phillip J Robinson Paola Roncada Chris Sander Jiahao Sha Erwei Song Sanjeeva Srivastava Aihua Sun Siu Kwan Sze Chao Tang Liujun Tang Ruijun Tian Juan Antonio Vizcaíno Chanjuan Wang Chen Wang Xiaowen Wang Xinxing Wang Yan Wang Tobias Weiss Mathias Wilhelm Robert Winkler Bernd Wollscheid Limsoon Wong Linhai Xie Wei Xie Tao Xu Tianhao Xu Liying Yan Jing Yang Xiao Yang John Yates Tao Yun Qiwei Zhai Bing Zhang Hui Zhang Lihua Zhang Lingqiang Zhang Pingwen Zhang Yukui Zhang Yu Zi Zheng Qing Zhong Yunping Zhu State Key Laboratory of Medical Proteomics Beijing Proteome Research Center National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing) Beijing Institute of Lifeomics Beijing China. hefc@***. International Academy of Phronesis Medicine (Guangdong) Guangdong China. hefc@***. Department of Biology Institute of Molecular Systems Biology ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland. aebersold@imsb.biol.ethz.ch. Macquarie Medical School Macquarie University Sydney New South Wales Australia. Institute of Pathology and Southwest Cancer Center Southwest Hospital Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University) and Key Laboratory of Tumor Immunopathology Ministry of Education of China Chongqing China. Institute of Health Service and Transfusion Medicine Beijing China. Department of Pathology and The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD USA. State Key Laboratory of Medical Proteomics Beijing Proteome Research Center National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing) Beijing Institute of Lifeomics Beijing China. Key Laboratory of Systems Biology Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology Chinese Academy of Sciences Shanghai China. Department of Nephrology First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital Nephrology Institute of the Chinese People's Liberation Army State Key Laboratory of Kidney Diseases National Clinical Research Center for Kidney Diseases Beijing Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease Research Beijing China. Institute of Chemistry Academia Sinica Taipei China. National Biomedical Imaging Center State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology Institute of Molecular Medicine Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences College of Future Technology Peking University Beijing China. School of Biological Sciences Queen's University of Belfast Belfast UK. Functional Proteomics Laboratory Centro Nacional de Biotecnología-CSIC Madrid Spain. Computational Systems Biochemistry Research Group Ma

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Global investments in pandemic preparedness and COVID-19: development assistance and domestic spending on health between 1990 and 2026

引用

The Lancet Global Health 2023年第3期11卷 e385-e413页

作者： Micah, Angela E. Bhangdia, Kayleigh Cogswell, Ian E. Lasher, Dylan Lidral-Porter, Brendan Maddison, Emilie R. Nguyen, Trang Nhu Ngoc Patel, Nishali Pedroza, Paola Solorio, Juan Stutzman, Hayley Tsakalos, Golsum Wang, Yifeng Warriner, Wesley Zhao, Yingxi Zlavog, Bianca S. Abbafati, Cristiana Abbas, Jaffar Abbasi-Kangevari, Mohsen Abbasi-Kangevari, Zeinab Abdelmasseh, Michael Abdulah, Deldar Morad Abedi, Aidin Abegaz, Kedir Hussein Abhilash, E.S. Aboagye, Richard Gyan Abolhassani, Hassan Abrigo, Michael R.M. Abubaker Ali, Hiwa Abu-Gharbieh, Eman Adem, Mohammed Hussien Afzal, Muhammad Sohail Ahmadi, Ali Ahmed, Haroon Ahmed Rashid, Tarik Aji, Budi Akbarialiabad, Hossein Akelew, Yibeltal Al Hamad, Hanadi Alam, Khurshid Alanezi, Fahad Mashhour Alanzi, Turki M. Al-Hanawi, Mohammed Khaled Alhassan, Robert Kaba Aljunid, Syed Mohamed Almustanyir, Sami Al-Raddadi, Rajaa M. Alvis-Guzman, Nelson Alvis-Zakzuk, Nelson J. Amare, Azmeraw T. Ameyaw, Edward Kwabena Amini-Rarani, Mostafa Amu, Hubert Ancuceanu, Robert Andrei, Tudorel Anwar, Sumadi Lukman Appiah, Francis Aqeel, Muhammad Arabloo, Jalal Arab-Zozani, Morteza Aravkin, Aleksandr Y. Aremu, Olatunde Aruleba, Raphael Taiwo Athari, Seyyed Shamsadin Avila-Burgos, Leticia Ayanore, Martin Amogre Azari, Samad Baig, Atif Amin Bantie, Abere Tilahun Barrow, Amadou Baskaran, Pritish Basu, Sanjay Batiha, Abdul-Monim Mohammad Baune, Bernhard T. Berezvai, Zombor Bhardwaj, Nikha Bhardwaj, Pankaj Bhaskar, Sonu Boachie, Micheal Kofi Bodolica, Virginia Botelho, João Silva Botelho Braithwaite, Dejana Breitborde, Nicholas J.K. Busse, Reinhard Cahuana-Hurtado, Lucero Catalá-López, Ferrán Chansa, Collins Charan, Jaykaran Chattu, Vijay Kumar Chen, Simiao Chukwu, Isaac Sunday Dadras, Omid Dandona, Lalit Dandona, Rakhi Dargahi, Abdollah Debela, Sisay Abebe Denova-Gutiérrez, Edgar Desye, Belay Dharmaratne, Samath Dhamminda Diao, Nancy Doan, Linh Phuong Dodangeh, Milad dos Santos, Wendel Mombaque Doshmangir, Leila Dube, John Eini, Ebrahim El Sayed Zaki, Maysaa El Tantawi, Maha Enyew, Daniel Berhanie Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation University of Washington Seattle WA United States Department of Applied Mathematics University of Washington Seattle WA United States Department of Health Metrics Sciences School of Medicine University of Washington Seattle WA United States Nuffield Department of Medicine University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom Department of Juridical and Economic Studies La Sapienza University Rome Italy Antai College of Economics Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai China Non-communicable Diseases Research Center Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Research Center for Immunodeficiencies Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Multiple Sclerosis Research Center Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Children’s Medical Center Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Tehran Heart Center Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Faculty of Medicine Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran National Institute for Health Research Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Department of Pharmacology Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Department of Cardiology Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Digestive Diseases Research Institute Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Department of Neurology Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Social Determinants of Health Research Center Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Department of Epidemiology Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Department of Health Economics and Statistics Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Department of Neurosurgery Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran Ophthalmic R

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted gaps in health surveillance systems, disease prevention, and treatment globally. Among the many factors that might have led to these gaps is the issue of the financing of national health systems, especially in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), as well as a robust global system for pandemic preparedness. We aimed to provide a comparative assessment of global health spending at the onset of the pandemic;characterise the amount of development assistance for pandemic preparedness and response disbursed in the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic;and examine expectations for future health spending and put into context the expected need for investment in pandemic preparedness. Methods: In this analysis of global health spending between 1990 and 2021, and prediction from 2021 to 2026, we estimated four sources of health spending: development assistance for health (DAH), government spending, out-of-pocket spending, and prepaid private spending across 204 countries and territories. We used the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)'s Creditor Reporting System (CRS) and the WHO Global Health Expenditure Database (GHED) to estimate spending. We estimated development assistance for general health, COVID-19 response, and pandemic preparedness and response using a keyword search. Health spending estimates were combined with estimates of resources needed for pandemic prevention and preparedness to analyse future health spending patterns, relative to need. Findings: In 2019, at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, US$9·2 trillion (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 9·1–9·3) was spent on health worldwide. We found great disparities in the amount of resources devoted to health, with high-income countries spending $7·3 trillion (95% UI 7·2–7·4) in 2019;293·7 times the $24·8 billion (95% UI 24·3–25·3) spent by low-income countries in 2019. That same year, $43·1 billion in development assistance was provided

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Author Correction: A multi-country test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic

引用

Nature human behaviour 2022年第9期6卷 1318-1319页

作者： Ke Wang Amit Goldenberg Charles A Dorison Jeremy K Miller Andero Uusberg Jennifer S Lerner James J Gross Bamikole Bamikole Agesin Márcia Bernardo Olatz Campos Luis Eudave Karolina Grzech Daphna Hausman Ozery Emily A Jackson Elkin Oswaldo Luis Garcia Shira Meir Drexler Anita Penić Jurković Kafeel Rana John Paul Wilson Maria Antoniadi Kermeka Desai Zoi Gialitaki Elizaveta Kushnir Khaoula Nadif Olalla Niño Bravo Rafia Nauman Marlies Oosterlinck Myrto Pantazi Natalia Pilecka Anna Szabelska I M M van Steenkiste Katarzyna Filip Andreea Ioana Bozdoc Gabriela Mariana Marcu Elena Agadullina Matúš Adamkovič Marta Roczniewska Cecilia Reyna Angelos P Kassianos Minja Westerlund Lina Ahlgren Sara Pöntinen Gabriel Agboola Adetula Pinar Dursun Azuka Ikechukwu Arinze Nwadiogo Chisom Arinze Chisom Esther Ogbonnaya Izuchukwu L G Ndukaihe Ilker Dalgar Handan Akkas Paulo Manuel Macapagal Savannah Lewis Irem Metin-Orta Francesco Foroni Megan Willis Anabela Caetano Santos Aviv Mokady Niv Reggev Merve A Kurfali Martin R Vasilev Nora L Nock Michal Parzuchowski Mauricio F Espinoza Barría Marek Vranka Markéta Braun Kohlová Ivan Ropovik Mikayel Harutyunyan Chunhui Wang Elvin Yao Maja Becker Efisio Manunta Gwenael Kaminski Jordane Boudesseul Dafne Marko Kortnee Evans David M G Lewis Andrej Findor Anais Thibault Landry John Jamir Benzon Aruta Manuel S Ortiz Zahir Vally Ekaterina Pronizius Martin Voracek Claus Lamm Maurice Grinberg Ranran Li Jaroslava Varella Valentova Giovanna Mioni Nicola Cellini Sau-Chin Chen Janis Zickfeld Karis Moon Habiba Azab Neil Levy Alper Karababa Jennifer L Beaudry Leanne Boucher W Matthew Collins Anna Louise Todsen Kevin van Schie Jáchym Vintr Jozef Bavolar Lada Kaliska Valerija Križanić Lara Samojlenko Razieh Pourafshari Sandra J Geiger Julia Beitner Lara Warmelink Robert M Ross Ian D Stephen Thomas J Hostler Soufian Azouaghe Randy McCarthy Anna Szala Caterina Grano Claudio Singh Solorzano Gulnaz Anjum William Jimenez-Leal Maria Bradford Laura Calderón Pérez Julio E Cruz Vásquez Oscar J Galindo-Caballero Juan Cami Harvard Kennedy School Harvard University Cambridge MA USA. Harvard Business School Harvard University Cambridge MA USA. Kellogg School of Management Northwestern University Evanston IL USA. Department of Psychology Willamette University Salem OR USA. millerj@willamette.edu. Institute of Psychology University of Tartu Tartu Estonia. Harvard Kennedy School and Department of Psychology Harvard University Cambridge MA USA. Department of Psychology Stanford University Stanford CA USA. Adekunle Ajasin University Akungba Akoko Nigeria. Faculdade de Psicologia e Ciências da Educação Universidade do Porto Porto Portugal. University of Deusto Barakaldo Spain. University of Navarra Pamplona Spain. University of Valencia Valencia Spain. Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden. California State University Northridge Los Angeles CA USA. Indiana University of Pennsylvania Indiana PA USA. Universidad de Navarra Pamplona Spain. Department of Cognitive Psychology Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience Ruhr University Bochum Bochum Germany. Kindergarten Kustošija Zagreb Croatia. GC University Lahore Lahore Pakistan. Montclair State University Jersey City NJ USA. European University of Cyprus Nicosia Cyprus. Indiana University of Pennsylvania Akron PA USA. Leiden University Culemborg The Netherlands. Stockholm Sweden. Poggio Imperiale Italy. Barakaldo Spain. Islamabad Pakistan. Gent Belgium. Oxford Internet Institute University of Oxford Oxford UK. Warsaw Poland. Queen's University Belfast Belfast Ireland. Universiteit Leiden Leiden The Netherlands. Institute of Psychology Jagiellonian University Krakow Poland. Department of Psychology Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu Sibiu Romania. Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest Romania. National Research University Higher School of Economics Moscow Russia. Institute of Psychology Faculty of Arts University of Presov Presov Slovakia. Institute of Social Sciences CSPS Sl

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：