检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

arXiv 2022年

作者： Tusfiqur, Hasan Md Nguyen, Duy M.H. Truong, Mai T.N. Nguyen, Triet A. Nguyen, Binh T. Barz, Michael Profitlich, Hans-Jürgen Than, Ngoc T.T. Le, Ngan Xie, Pengtao Sonntag, Daniel Germany Machine Learning and Simulation Lab University of Stuttgart Germany Department of Multimedia Engineering Dongguk University Korea Republic of Department of Mathematics University of Architecture Ho Chi Minh City Viet Nam AISIA Lab University of Science VNUHCM Viet Nam Byers Eye Institute Stanford University United States Department of Computer Science and Computer Engineering University of Arkansas United States Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of California San Diego United States Applied Artificial Intelligence Oldenburg University Germany

Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of vision loss in the world, and early DR detection is necessary to prevent vision loss and support an appropriate treatment. In this work, we leverage interactive machine learning and introduce a joint learning framework, termed DRG-Net, to effectively learn both disease grading and multi-lesion segmentation. Our DRG-Net consists of two modules: (i) DRG-AI-System to classify DR Grading, localize lesion areas and provide visual explanation and (ii) DRG-Expert-Interaction to receive feedback from user-expert and improve the DRG-AI-System. To deal with sparse data, we utilize transfer learning mechanisms to extract invariant feature representations by using Wasserstein distance and adversarial learning-based entropy minimization. Besides, we propose a novel attention strategy at both low- and high-level features to automatically select the most significant lesion information and provide explainable properties. In terms of human interaction, we further develop DRG-Net as a tool that enables expert users to correct the system’s predictions, which may then be used to update the system as a whole. Moreover, thanks to the attention mechanism and loss functions constraint between lesion features and classification features, our approach can be robust given a certain level of noise in the feedback of users. We have benchmarked DRG-Net on the two largest DR datasets, i.e., IDRID and FGADR, and compared it to various state-of-the-art deep learning networks. In addition to outperforming other SOTA approaches, DRG-Net is effectively updated using user feedback, even in a weakly-supervised manner. © 2022, CC BY.

关键词： Grading

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Evaluating the Accuracy and Reliability of Real-World Digital Mobility Outcomes in Older Adults After Hip Fracture: Cross-Sectional Observational Study

引用

JMIR formative research 2025年 9卷 e67792页

作者： Martin A Berge Anisoara Paraschiv-Ionescu Cameron Kirk Arne Küderle Encarna Micó-Amigo Clemens Becker Andrea Cereatti Silvia Del Din Monika Engdal Judith Garcia-Aymerich Karoline B Grønvik Clint Hansen Jeffrey M Hausdorff Jorunn L Helbostad Carl-Philipp Jansen Lars Gunnar Johnsen Jochen Klenk Sarah Koch Walter Maetzler Dimitrios Megaritis Arne Müller Lynn Rochester Lars Schwickert Kristin Taraldsen Beatrix Vereijken Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim Norway. Laboratory of Movement Analysis and Measurement Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland. Translational and Clinical Research Institute Faculty of Medical Sciences Newcastle University Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom. Machine Learning and Data Analytics Lab Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Erlangen Germany. Geriatric Center Medical Faculty Heidelberg Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany. Department of Geriatrics and Rehabilitation Robert Bosch Hospital Stuttgart Germany. Department of Electronics and Telecommunications Politecnico di Torino Turin Italy. National Institute for Health and Care Research Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre Newcastle University and the Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom. Barcelona Institute for Global Health Barcelona Spain. Department of Medicine and Life Sciences Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona Catalonia Spain. CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública Madrid Spain. Department of Neurology University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein and Kiel University Kiel Germany. Center for the Study of Movement Cognition and Mobility Neurological Institute Tel Aviv Medical Center Tel Aviv Israel. Department of Physical Therapy Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel. Sagol School of Neuroscience Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel. Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center Rush University Medical Center Chicago IL United States. Department of Orthopedic Surgery Rush Medical College Rush University Chicago IL United States. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery St. Olav's Hospital Trondheim Norway. Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry Ulm University Ulm Germany. IB University of Health and Social Sciences Study Centre Stuttgart Stuttgart Ger

BACKGROUND:Algorithms estimating real-world digital mobility outcomes (DMOs) are increasingly validated in healthy adults and various disease cohorts. However, their accuracy and reliability in older adults after hip fracture, who often walk slowly for short durations, is underexplored. OBJECTIVE:This study examined DMO accuracy and reliability in a hip fracture cohort considering walking bout (WB) duration, physical function, days since surgery, and walking aid use. METHODS:In total, 19 community-dwelling participants were real-world monitored for 2.5 hours using a lower back wearable device and a reference system combining inertial modules, distance sensors, and pressure insoles. A total of 6 DMO estimates from 164 WBs from 58% (11/19) of the participants (aged 71-90 years; assessed 32-390 days after surgery; Short Physical Performance Battery [SPPB] scores of 3-12; gait speed range 0.39-1.34 m/s) were assessed against the reference system at the WB and participant level. We stratified by WB duration (all WBs, WBs of >10 seconds, WBs of 10-30 seconds, and WBs of >30 seconds) and lower versus higher SPPB scores and observed whether days since surgery and walking aid use affected DMO accuracy and reliability. RESULTS:Across WBs, walking speed and distance ranged from 0.25 to 1.29 m/s and from 1.7 to 436.5 m, respectively. Estimation of walking speed, cadence, stride duration, number of steps, and distance stratified by WB duration showed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranging from 0.50 to 0.99 and mean relative errors (MREs) from -6.9% to 12.8%. Stride length estimation showed poor reliability, with ICCs ranging from 0.30 to 0.49 and MREs from 6.1% to 13.2%. Walking speed and distance ICCs in the higher-SPPB score group ranged from 0.85 to 0.99, and MREs ranged from -10.1% to -1.7%. In the lower-SPPB score group, walking speed and distance ICCs ranged from 0.17 to 0.99, and MREs ranged from 13.5% to 32.6%. There was no discernible effect of time since su

关键词： active aging cadence digital mobility assessment distance free living gait walking speed wearable device

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Bayesian Model Selection of Lithium-Ion Battery Models via Bayesian Quadrature

引用

IFAC-PapersOnLine 2023年第2期56卷 10521-10526页

作者： Masaki Adachi Yannick Kuhn Birger Horstmann Arnulf Latz Michael A. Osborne David A. Howey Machine Learning Research Group University of Oxford OX2 6ED UK Battery Intelligence Lab University of Oxford OX1 3PJ UK Toyota Motor Corporation Shizuoka 410-1193 Japan German Aerospace Center (DLR) Pfaffenwaldring 38-40 70569 Stuttgart Germany Helmholtz Institute Ulm Helmholtzstraße 11 89081 Ulm Germany Universität Ulm Albert-Einstein-Allee 47 89081 Ulm Germany The Faraday Institution Harwell Campus Didcot OX11 0RA UK

A wide variety of battery models are available, and it is not always obvious which model ‘best’ describes a dataset. This paper presents a Bayesian model selection approach using Bayesian quadrature. The model evidence is adopted as the selection metric, choosing the simplest model that describes the data, in the spirit of Occam's razor. However, estimating this requires integral computations over parameter space, which is usually prohibitively expensive. Bayesian quadrature offers sample-efficient integration via model-based inference that minimises the number of battery model evaluations. The posterior distribution of model parameters can also be inferred as a byproduct without further computation. Here, the simplest lithium-ion battery models, equivalent circuit models, were used to analyse the sensitivity of the selection criterion to given different datasets and model configurations. We show that popular model selection criteria, such as root-mean-square error and Bayesian information criterion, can fail to select a parsimonious model in the case of a multimodal posterior. The model evidence can spot the optimal model in such cases, simultaneously providing the variance of the evidence inference itself as an indication of confidence. We also show that Bayesian quadrature can compute the evidence faster than popular Monte Carlo based solvers.

关键词： Bayesian identifiability system identification estimation battery lithium-ion

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Bayesian Model Selection of Lithium-Ion Battery Models via Bayesian Quadrature

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2022年

作者： Adachi, Masaki Kuhn, Yannick Horstmann, Birger Osborne, Michael A. Howey, David A. Machine Learning Research Group University of Oxford OX2 6ED United Kingdom Battery Intelligence Lab University of Oxford OX1 3PJ United Kingdom Pfaffenwaldring 38-40 Stuttgart70569 Germany Helmholtz Institute Ulm Helmholtzstraße 11 Ulm89081 Germany Universität Ulm Albert-Einstein-Allee 47 Ulm89081 Germany The Faraday Institution Harwell Campus DidcotOX11 0RA United Kingdom

This paper presents a Bayesian model selection approach via Bayesian quadrature and sensitivity analysis of the selection criterion for a lithium-ion battery model. The Bayesian model evidence is adopted as the metric, which can select the simplest but well-describing model based on Occam's razor principle. While the model evidence requires prohibitive integral computations over parameter space, Bayesian quadrature offers sample-efficient integration via model-based inference to minimise the number of battery model evaluations. The posterior distribution of battery model parameters can also be inferred as a byproduct in one go, which is also beneficial in creating a digital twin. The simplest lithium-ion battery models, equivalent circuit models, were used to analyse the sensitivity of the selection criterion at given different datasets and model configurations. We show that popular selection criteria, such as root-mean-square error, and Bayesian information criterion, can fail to select a correct model in a multimodal posterior case. The model evidence can spot the true model in such cases, simultaneously providing the variance of evidence inference itself as an indication of confidence. Bayesian quadrature can compute the evidence faster than popular MCMC *** Codes 62C10, 62F15 © 2022, CC BY-NC-ND.

关键词： Parameter estimation

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Reports of the AAAI 2011 conference workshops

Reports of the AAAI 2011 conference workshops

引用

作者： Agmon, Noa Agrawal, Vikas Aha, David W. Aloimonos, Yiannis Buckley, Donagh Doshi, Prashant Geib, Christopher Grasso, Floriana Green, Nancy Johnston, Benjamin Kaliski, Burt Kiekintveld, Christopher Law, Edith Lieberman, Henry Mengshoel, Ole J. Metzler, Ted Modayil, Joseph Oard, Douglas W. Onder, Nilufer O'Sullivan, Barry Pastra, Katerina Precup, Doina Ramachandran, Sowmya Reed, Chris Sariel-Talay, Sanem Selker, Ted Shastri, Lokendra Singh, Satinder Smith, Stephen F. Srivastava, Siddharth Sukthankar, Gita Uthus, David C. Williams, Mary-Anne Department of Computer Science University of Texas at Austin United States Center for Knowledge Driven Information Systems Infosys Labs India Adaptive Systems Section Naval Research Laboratory Washington DC United States Department of Computer Science University of Maryland College Park United States EMC's Center of Excellence in Ireland Research Europe at EMC Ireland Department of Computer Science University of Georgia United States School of Informatics University of Edinburgh United Kingdom Department of Computer Science University of Liverpool United Kingdom Department of Computer Science University of North Carolina Greensboro United States Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology University of Technology Sydney Australia VeriSign Inc. United States Department of Computer Science University of Texas at El Paso United States Machine Learning Department Carnegie Mellon University United States Massachusetts Institute of Technology Media Laboratory United States Carnegie Mellon University's Silicon Valley Campus United States Darrell W. Hughes Program for Religion and Science Dialogue Oklahoma City University United States Department of Computing Science University of Alberta Canada College of Information Studies Institute for Advanced Computer Studies University of Maryland College Park United States Department of Computer Science Michigan Technological University United States Department of Computer Science University College Cork Ireland Cognitive Systems Research Insitute Athens Greece School of Computer Science McGill University Canada Stottler Henke Inc. United States School of Computing University of Dundee United Kingdom Department of Computer Engineering Istanbul Technical University Turkey Convergence Lab Infosys Technologies Ltd. United States Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of Michigan Ann Arbor United States Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon University United States University of Wisconsin

The AAAI-11 workshop program was held Sunday and Monday, August 7-18, 2011, at the Hyatt Regency San Francisco in San Francisco, California USA. The AAAI-11 workshop program included 15 workshops covering a wide range of topics in artificial intelligence. The titles of the workshops were Activity Context Representation: Techniques and Languages;Analyzing Microtext;Applied Adversarial Reasoning and Risk Modeling;Artificial Intelligence and Smarter Living: The Conquest of Complexity;Artifiicial Intelligence for Data Center Management and Cloud Computing;Automated Action Planning for Autonomous Mobile Robots;Computational Models of Natural Argument;Generalized Planning;Human Computation;Human-Robot Interaction in Elder Care;Interactive Decision Theory and Game Theory, 2010;Language-Action Tools for Cognitive Artificial Agents: Integrating Vision, Action, and Language;Lifelong learning from Sensorimotor Experience;Plan, Activity, and Intent Recognition;and Scalable Integration of Analytics and Visualization. This article presents short summaries of those events. Copyright © 2012, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. All rights reserved.

关键词： Human robot interaction

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Why is the Winner the Best?

Why is the Winner the Best?

引用

Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

作者： M. Eisenmann A. Reinke V. Weru M. D. Tizabi F. Isensee T. J. Adler S. Ali V. Andrearczyk M. Aubreville U. Baid S. Bakas N. Balu S. Bano J. Bernal S. Bodenstedt A. Casella V. Cheplygina M. Daum M. De Bruijne A. Depeursinge R. Dorent J. Egger D. G. Ellis S. Engelhardt M. Ganz N. Ghatwary G. Girard P. Godau A. Gupta L. Hansen K. Harada M. Heinrich N. Heller A. Hering A. Huaulmé P. Jannin A. E. Kavur O. Kodym M. Kozubek J. Li H. Li J. Ma C. Martín-Isla B. Menze A. Noble V. Oreiller N. Padoy S. Pati K. Payette T. Rädsch J. Rafael-Patiño V. Singh Bawa S. Speidel C. H. Sudre K. Van Wijnen M. Wagner D. Wei A. Yamlahi M. H. Yap C. Yuan M. Zenk A. Zia D. Zimmerer D. Aydogan B. Bhattarai L. Bloch R. Brüngel J. Cho C. Choi Q. Dou I. Ezhov C. M. Friedrich C. Fuller R. R. Gaire A. Galdran Á. García Faura M. Grammatikopoulou S. Hong M. Jahanifar I. Jang A. Kadkhodamohammadi I. Kang F. Kofler S. Kondo H. Kuijf M. Li M. Luu T. Martinčič P. Morais M. A. Naser B. Oliveira D. Owen S. Pang J. Park S. Park S. Płotka E. Puybareau N. Rajpoot K. Ryu N. Saeed A. Shephard P. Shi D. Štepec R. Subedi G. Tochon H. R. Torres H. Urien J. L. Vilaça K. A. Wahid H. Wang J. Wang L. Wang X. Wang B. Wiestler M. Wodzinski F. Xia J. Xie Z. Xiong S. Yang Y. Yang Z. Zhao K. Maier-Hein P. F. Jäger A. Kopp-Schneider L. Maier-Hein Division of Intelligent Medical Systems German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Helmholtz Imaging German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany Division of Biostatistics German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Division of Medical Image Computing German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences School of Computing University of Leeds Leeds UK Institute of Informatics School of Management HES-SO Valais-Wallis University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland Sierre Switzerland Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Lausanne University Hospital Lausanne Switzerland Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt Ingolstadt Germany Center for Artificial Intelligence and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D) and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA) University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA Department of Radiology University of Washington Seattle WA USA Department of Computer Science Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS) University College London London UK Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona & Computer Vision Center Barcelona Spain Division of Translational Surgical Oncology National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC) Dresden Dresden Germany Department of Advanced Robotics Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia Italy Department of Electronics Information and Bioengineering Politecnico di Milano Milan Italy IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark Department of General Visceral and Transplantation Surgery Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany Department of Radiology and Nuc

International benchmarking competitions have become fundamental for the comparative performance assessment of image analysis methods. However, little attention has been given to investigating what can be learnt from these competitions. Do they really generate scientific progress? What are common and successful participation strategies? What makes a solution superior to a competing method? To address this gap in the literature, we performed a multicenter study with all 80 competitions that were conducted in the scope of IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021. Statistical analyses performed based on comprehensive descriptions of the submitted algorithms linked to their rank as well as the underlying participation strategies revealed common characteristics of winning solutions. These typically include the use of multi-task learning (63%) and/or multi-stage pipelines (61%), and a focus on augmentation (100%), image preprocessing (97%), data curation (79%), and post-processing (66%). The “typical” lead of a winning team is a computer scientist with a doctoral degree, five years of experience in biomedical image analysis, and four years of experience in deep learning. Two core general development strategies stood out for highly-ranked teams: the reflection of the metrics in the method design and the focus on analyzing and handling failure cases. According to the organizers, 43% of the winning algorithms exceeded the state of the art but only 11% completely solved the respective domain problem. The insights of our study could help researchers (1) improve algorithm development strategies when approaching new problems, and (2) focus on open research questions revealed by this work.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Correction: Assessing real-world gait with digital technology? Validation, insights and recommendations from the Mobilise-D consortium

引用

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation 2024年第1期21卷 71页

作者： M Encarna Micó-Amigo Tecla Bonci Anisoara Paraschiv-Ionescu Martin Ullrich Cameron Kirk Abolfazl Soltani Arne Küderle Eran Gazit Francesca Salis Lisa Alcock Kamiar Aminian Clemens Becker Stefano Bertuletti Philip Brown Ellen Buckley Alma Cantu Anne-Elie Carsin Marco Caruso Brian Caulfield Andrea Cereatti Lorenzo Chiari Ilaria D'Ascanio Bjoern Eskofier Sara Fernstad Marcel Froehlich Judith Garcia-Aymerich Clint Hansen Jeffrey M Hausdorff Hugo Hiden Emily Hume Alison Keogh Felix Kluge Sarah Koch Walter Maetzler Dimitrios Megaritis Arne Mueller Martijn Niessen Luca Palmerini Lars Schwickert Kirsty Scott Basil Sharrack Henrik Sillén David Singleton Beatrix Vereijken Ioannis Vogiatzis Alison J Yarnall Lynn Rochester Claudia Mazzà Silvia Del Din Translational and Clinical Research Institute Faculty of Medical Sciences Newcastle University Newcastle Upon Tyne UK. Department of Mechanical Engineering and Insigneo Institute for in Silico Medicine The University of Sheffield Sheffield UK. Laboratory of Movement Analysis and Measurement Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland. Machine Learning and Data Analytics Lab Department of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen Nürnberg Erlangen Germany. Center for the Study of Movement Cognition and Mobility Neurological Institute Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center Tel Aviv Israel. Department of Biomedical Sciences University of Sassari Sassari Italy. Department of Electronics and Telecommunications Politecnico di Torino Turin Italy. National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) Newcastle University and The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Newcastle Upon Tyne UK. Robert Bosch Gesellschaft für Medizinische Forschung Stuttgart Germany. The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Newcastle Upon Tyne UK. School of Computing Newcastle University Newcastle Upon Tyne UK. Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal) Barcelona Spain. Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona Catalonia Spain. CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP) Madrid Spain. Insight Centre for Data Analytics University College Dublin Dublin Ireland. School of Public Health Physiotherapy and Sports Science University College Dublin Dublin Ireland. Department of Electrical Electronic and Information Engineering «Guglielmo Marconi» University of Bologna Bologna Italy. Health Sciences and Technologies-Interdepartmental Center for Industrial Research (CIRI-SDV) University of Bologna Bologna Italy. Grünenthal GmbH Aachen Germany. Department of Neurology University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel Kiel Germany. Sagol School of Neuroscien

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：