检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

THE NO FRAME CONCEPT - ITS IMPACT ON SHIPYARD COST

naval ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1984年第3期96卷 218-232页

作者： NAPPI, NS WALZ, RW WIERNICKI, CJ Natale S. Nappi:graduated from City College of New York in 1954 with a B.S. degree in civil engineering and received his M.S. in civil engineering from the Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn in 1959. He began his professional career in 1954 at the New York Naval Shipyard as a naval architect (structures) performing detail structural design and fabrication studies for CVAs LPDs DDs and CGs and eventually became a supervisory naval architect (structures). From 1965 to 1973 he was a member of the staff of the Computer-Aided Design Division at the David Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center (DTNSRDC). As such he was involved in the development of the computer structural design tool the SSDP (in association with Frank M. Lev) and automated detail design programs (CASDOS). His current position is Senior Naval Architect Consultant in the structural integrity group of the Ship Structures Division Structures Department DTNSRDC. Mr. Nappi is the author and co-author of numerous technical papers and reports covering a wide spectrum of topics such as automated structural design process design for producibility and survivability material weight and cost trade-off studies and structural weight determination for high performance ships (i.e. SES SWATH HYSWAS). He has lectured on the subjects of design for survivability and ship structures at the Naval Post Graduate School and MIT. He is a member of ASNE ASCE U.S. Naval Institute Sigma Xi and is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of New York. Mr. Nappi was a member of the NAVSEA working commitee for the computer supported design planning effort and is currently a member of the DTNSRDC ASSET Advisory Committee. Ronald W. Walz:graduated in 1974 from Pennsylvania State University with a B.S. degree in civil engineering. He began his professional career in 1974 at the David Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center as a structural engineer in the structural design concepts group of the Ship Structures Division Structures Department.

A proposed cost effective alternative to current U.S. Navy structurally configured hulls is presented in this paper. This proposed design for producibility concept involves the elimination of structural stanchions and transverse web frames. The potential impact of this “no frame” concept on structural design, weight and construction and material costs for naval surface frigates and destroyers is reflected in 1) reduced costs for the installation of distributive systems and 2) a reduced number and complexity of structural details providing a more reliable and less costly structure. This study was performed in three parts: 1) Determine the most feasible length between bulkheads without frames; 2) Using this length perform detail weight studies and construction and material costs analysis comparison on a 72-foot long hull module, with and without frames, for a FFG-7, and 3) Estimate the saving in man hours of labor on the installation of distributive systems and shipfitting for an FFG-7. For the feasible length studies on the “no frame” structural configuration, thirty-seven strength, weight and vertical center of gravity studies were performed on two ship classes; twenty-two on the FFG-7 class and fifteen on the DD-963 class. The detailed weight studies and construction and material cost analyses were conducted for FFG-7 “no frame” and “as built” modules. Results indicating the “no frame” concept module was 6.8% heavier and 14.8% less costly than the “as built” module. For the impact of an FFG-7 “no frame” structurally configured hull on the cost of labor required for the installation of distributive systems and for other functional work such as ship fitting, welding, and electrical, this study indicated a reduction of 169,206 labor hours per ship, representing 7.12% of the total required man hours to fabricate an FFG-7 class ship. With the employment of the “no frame” concept, certain areas of significant concern and potential risk were addressed. These include: 1) t

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

DESIGN FOR NEW-JERSEY, IOWA, AND DES-MOINES MODERNIZATION

引用

naval ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1984年第3期96卷 25-38页

作者： SIMS, PJ EDWARDS, JR DICKEY, RL SHULL, HS Philip J. Sims:graduated from Webb Institute in 1971 and went to work for the Advance Design Branch of the Naval Ship Engineering Center. He was part of the FFG-7 design team in 1972. The 1973–75 years were spent developing automated early-stage aircraft carrier design procedures and performing carrier design trade-off work in support of the CVV design. He returned to school in 1976 for a masters at M.I. T. The 1977–80 period was spent updating the Navy's destroyer-cruiser early-stage design procedures and performing studies for the CGN-42 reserve FFX and DDX (later DDG 51) projects. Also during this period he was team leader on concept formulation (CONFORM) studies of new ships such as a heavy combatant and a low detectability ship. From 1981 to early 1983 Mr. Sims was Design Integration Manager for the BB-62 and Ship Design Manager for the BB-61 and CA-134. He is presently principal naval architect for the FFX study and also works on the NA TO frigate effort. James F. Edwards Sr:.is the Technical Director Ship Analytics Inc. Washington D.C. Operations and was the Ship Design Manager for the battleship USSNew Jerseyprior to his departure from NAVSEA in August 1983. He joined the U.S. Navy Reserves in 1954 and served on active duty from 1957 to 1960. From 1961 to 1963 he worked for McLaughlin Research Corporation as a section head in the drafting department. From 1963 to 1966 he worked for the Vitro Corporation of America in the Terrier (surface missile systems) Department. In 1966 he participated in the contract design of the first shipboard integrated digital ASW Command and Control system while working for the Stanwick Corporation. In 1967 Mr. Edwards accepted a position at NAVSHIPS in the Combat System Integration Division. In 1974 he transferred to what is currently NAVSEA's Hull Design Division. In 1980 Mr. Edwards was designated as the Battleship and Heavy Cruiser General Arrangements Task Leader and subsequently served as the Hull Task Group Manager the Ship Configuration Control Manager and fina

In reactivating the battleship New Jersey , the Navy faced three major problems. The baseline data on the ship was not readily available or reliable, a new generation cruise missile armament was proposed, and the ship delivery schedule was very tight. After doing a feasibility study, system design engineers were taken onboard the mothballed ship to resolve the design problems. Being on the ship allowed an intensive effort and immediate reference to the actual ship configuration. The tools used to control this effort were a ship check plan, a ship check form and the master arrangement drawing. Simultaneously with the design effort, a repair scoping effort was conducted. The design evolution and solutions to the major problems are described. The results of the New Jersey effort are shown with sample documentation, the ship characteristics and the downstream design effort. The Iowa was the next ship to be modernized. The top level requirements were the same as New Jersey's but new problems were encountered. More options were investigated which diverted attention from the basic effort. A fundamental difference was the Iowa had not had a 1968 reactivation as the New Jersey had, so items that were repair and reactivation on the New Jersey in 1968 had to be part of the Iowa modernization. A major influence on the Iowa design process was that a complete set of specifications for a private yard bid had to be developed. The next effort was to install the same New Jersey modernization payload on a Des Moines class heavy cruiser. Heavy cruisers are large ships but significantly smaller than battleships and much closer to their naval architectural limits of weight and center of gravity. They have much less topside area than the battleships, and the new payload was very topside space consuming. The cruisers are also much more restricted in internal volume. Two feasibility studies were conducted. One resolved volume problems but approached the weight and center of gravity limits.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Theoretical And Experimental Predictions Of The Dynamic Behavior Of Marine Risers

Theoretical And Experimental Predictions Of The Dynamic Beha...

引用

oceanS

作者： C. Chryssostomidis N. Patrikalakis Naval Architecture MIT Sea Grant College Program USA Department of Ocean Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA USA

A comparison of theoretical predictions of the dynamic response of a riser model with experimental measurements is made. The theoretical estimates are obtained from the solution of the linearized structural model of a thin rod under tension. The model of the local hydrodynamic force is based on results from rigid and spring mounted cylinder experiments. The experimental measurements are obtained from a 3m flexible cylindrical model, representative of a shallow water riser. The comparison between theoretical estimates and experimental measurements can be used to evaluate the significance of the assumptions underlying the use of rigid cylinder experimental results for the prediction of the dynamic response of single tube marine risers.

关键词： Strain measurement Prototypes Predictive models Root mean square Estimation theory Testing Frequency measurement Motion measurement Springs Capacitive sensors

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

THE SURFACE EFFECT CATAMARAN - PROGRESS IN CONCEPT ASSESSMENT

引用

naval ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1983年第3期95卷 301-311页

作者： WILSON, FW VIARS, PR ADAMS, JD Fred W. Wilson:received his B.A. degree from the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in 1967 and his M.A. degree from the University of Tennessee in 1971. Mr. Wilson has been involved with air-supported vehicle technology at the Aviation and Surface Effects Department of the David Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center since 1967. Until 1979 Mr. Wilson was with the Surface Effect Ship Division and participated in early SES development the SES-100A and -100B trials and in the 3000-ton SES program. Since 1979 Mr. Wilson has been in the Program Development Office participating in aircraft programs as well as the current twin-cushion surface effect ship (Surface Effect Catamaran) program. Philip R. Viars:graduated from the University of Cincinnati with a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering in 1974. He received his M.S. in Ocean and Marine Engineering from George Washington University in 1980. Since 1972 Mr. Viars has worked in the Aviation and Surface Effects Department at the David Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center (DTNSRDC). While at DTNSRDC Mr. Viars has participated in model and full-scale experimental programs focused on simulation. Mr. Viars is recognized as the Center expert in SES stability and performance having participated in most of the manned Navy SES testcraft evaluations. Since 1981 Mr. Viars has been in the Program Development Office where he has worked on the twin-cushion surface effect ship (SECAT) and other programs. John D. Adams:received his B.S.E. in 1972 from the University of Michigan School of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering. He has spent seven years in Marine engineering research Marine systems design and development and dynamic tow tank testing and data analysis. Mr. Adams is currently responsible for the Maritime Dynamics Inc. field operation at the U.S. NavySES Test Facility (SESTF) Patuxent River Maryland. On-site responsibility has been the design development and manned testing of active ride control systems for the U.S. NavyXR-

The surface effect catamaran incorporates twin high length-to-beam cushions to support a low length-to-beam platform. The performance characteristics of the resulting vehicle, i.e., the resistance and head sea motions, are equivalent to a higher length-to-beam surface effect ship. The high lateral stability which results from the widely spaced hulls and cushions of the surface effect catamaran provides several advantages not inherent in conventional surface effect ship configurations. These advantages are manifested by high cross-structure height and reduced structural loads without reduction in static or dynamic roll stability. For an 800-ton ship the widely spaced cushions provide a capability of controlling off-head sea types of motions and the virtual elimination of green water over the deck up through Sea State 6. Model tests have validated cushionborne and hullborne resistance computer prediction programs. Head sea motions tests have justified the use of high cross-structure height to minimize high slam types of structural loads. Preliminary design and model tests indicate the potential for the surface effect catamaran to operate as an open ocean ship in smaller sizes than heretofore thought possible. In addition, its planform and large volume provides pay-load capabilities of much larger ships.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

PUTTING AN OIL-SPILL CLEANUP COMPUTER-MODEL TO WORK FOR THE NAVY

引用

naval ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1983年第3期95卷 165-172页

作者： NYHART, JD PSARAFTIS, HN YAROSCHAK, PJ Mr. J. D. Nyhart:is professor of management at the Sloan School of Management and the Department of Ocean Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. His current research and writing focus on the use of scientific and technical material in formal judicial and administrative proceedings as well as the development of economic and regulatory models appropriate for deep ocean mining and oil-spill control. Harilaos N. Psaraftis:is Assistant Professor of Marine Systems at the Department of Ocean Engineering at the Operations Research Center at M.I.T. Professor Psaraftis received two M.Sc. degrees in 1977 (in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering and in Shipping and Shipbuilding Management) and a Ph.D. in 1979 (in Ocean Systems Operations Research) all from M.I.T. Professor Psaraftis has been conducting research in problem areas such as the probabilistic modeling of underwater detection and optimal sensor allocation (project sponsored by ONR) the optimization of oil spill cleanup operations (project sponsored by a consortium of government and industry organizations) the development of routing and scheduling algorithms in transportation problems (project sponsored by DOT) and the analysis and solution algorithms of sealift routing and scheduling problems (project sponsored by ONR and the Military Sealift Command). Professor Psaraftis has published in various journals and is currently the Chairman of the Ocean Systems Management Program at M.I.T. Mr. Paul J. Yaroschak:received his Bachelors Degree in Civil Engineering from Villanova University and his Masters Degree in Environmental Engineering from Northeastern University. He has served in the Civil Engineer Corps U.S. Navy in Public Works and Construction Management and as a Project Engineer for Navy-wide Water and Wastewater Treatment Projects for the Naval Facilities Engineering Command. He is currently Head of the Environmental Engineering Branch of the Naval Facilities Engineering Command. Mr. Yaroschak is a Registered Professional Engineer i

A research group at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology has completed the first phase of the development of a computer assisted model for analyzing complex decisions and policies regarding oil spill cleanup. The model is the product of an ongoing MIT Sea Grant project, sponsored by a consortium of government and industry organizations, including the National oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the U.S. C oast G uard , the U.S. N avy , the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the Spill Control Association of America, JFB Scientific Corporation, the Doherty Foundation, Petro-Canada and Texaco. The model can be used, among other things, in strategic planning for the long-term oil spill response needs of a region, in assisting On Scene Coordinators in responding to a specific spill (tactical/operational setting), in evaluating the environmental and economic damages of a spill versus the cost of cleanup, in simulation and training, and in the analysis of various policy and regulatory issues such as the effects of delays, the use of dispersants and the investigation of liability and compensation issues. The paper describes the model in detail, focuses on its potential uses and presents experience with its application in conjunction with pollution control efforts of the U.S. Navy. Specifically, we outline the application of the model in the Port of Charleston, South Carolina, an ongoing project sponsored by the naval Facilities engineering Command. The difficulty of gathering data for such an application is discussed.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

THE STRUCTURAL SYNTHESIS DESIGN program - ITS IMPACT ON THE FLEET

引用

naval ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1983年第3期95卷 87-99页

作者： WIERNICKI, CJ GOODING, TG NAPPI, NS Mr. Christopher J. Wiernicki:graduated from Vanderbilt University in 1980 with a B.E. degree in Structural Engineering. Upon graduation he began his professional career at the David Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center. As a structural engineer in the Surface Ship Structures Division Mr. Wiernicki was responsible for developing improved methods and procedures for designing and evaluating structural systems for surf ace combatants. Specific projects included design for producibility development and evaluation of automated ship structural design methods and participation in the structural design of the CG 49 Cruiser and the current DDG 51 Destroyer. In 1982 Mr. Wiernicki received his M.S. degree in Ocean Engineering from George Washington University. Mr. Wiernicki is a recipient of the SNAME 1982-82 Graduate Scholarship and is currently doing post graduate work in Naval Architecture at Massachusetts Institute of Technology he is a member of ASNE SNAME ASCE and Chi Epsilon. Mr. Thomas G. Gooding:graduated in 1975 from the University of Michigan with B.S. degrees in Oceanography and Naval Architecture. After graduation he began his professional career at the Naval Ship Engineering Center (NA VSEC) as a structural engineer. From 1975 till 1978 Mr. Gooding worked in the area of ship dry docking and was the structural task leader on the complex overhaul ofUSS Long Beach (CGN-9). Mr. Gooding returned to the University of Michigan to receive a M.S. in Naval Architecture in 1979. Currently Mr. Gooding is the structural task leader on the DDGX/DDG 51 program at the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA). Mr. Gooding is a member of SNAME and the Naval Institute. Mr. Natale S. Nappi:graduated from City College of New York in 1954 with a Bachelor of Civil Engineering and received his M.S. in Civil Engineering from Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn in 1959. He began his professional career in 1964 at the New York Naval Shipyard as a Naval Architect (Structure) performing detail structural design and fabrication s

The structural design of a ship's section is a complicated, repetitive and time consuming task. With the advent of new technology, high speed computers have enabled the ship designer to accomplish in a matter of seconds what would formerly take days to accomplish by hand. The Structural Synthesis Design program (SSDP) is a N avy developed computer-aided design tool which is used to design (or to analyze) the longitudinal scantlings for a variety of ship cross sections, consisting of any practical combinations of decks, platforms, bulkheads and materials, i.e., various steel and aluminum alloys. The final hull section design will have the lowest practical weight for the chosen geometric configuration, structural arrangements, and imposed loadings. The scantling developed by the program will satisfy all U.S. N avy ship structural design criteria. An explanation of the objective and design elements of N avy ship structures is included. The rationale behind the SSDP design philosophy is developed along with the significant program capabilities. In an attempt to highlight the influence of automated design procedures on the current naval ship design process, the effect of the SSDP on the DDG 51 destroyer structural development is addressed.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

U.S. AND FOREIGN HULL FORM, MACHINERY AND STRUCTURAL DESIGN PRACTICES

引用

naval Engineers Journal 1983年第6期95卷 36-53页

作者： KEHOE, JAMES W. BROWER, KENNETH S. MEIER, HERBERT A. RUNNERSTROM, CDR. ERIC James W. Kehoe Jr. is well known for his work in conducting comparative naval architecture studies of U.S. and foreign warship design practices for which he received the ASNE Gold Medal for 1981 and the Legion of Merit. He is currently a partner in Spectrum Associates Incorporated Arlington Virginia where he is engaged in the feasibility and concept design of naval ships and in continuing his comparative engineering analyses of U.S. and foreign warships. Prior to his retirement from the U.S. Navy as a Captain in 1982 his naval career involved sea duty aboard three destroyers and three aircraft carriers including command of the USS John R. Pierce (DD-753) and engineer officer of the USS Wasp (CVS-18). Ashore he had duty at the Naval Sea Systems Command where he directed the Comparative Naval Architecture Program as an instructor in project management in the Polaris missile project and as a nuclear weapons officer. He holds a B.S. in mathematics from Stonehill College Massachusetts (1952) and an MA in education from San Diego State College (1959). A frequent contributor to the Naval Engineers Journal U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings and the International Defense Review he has published a number of articles on U.S. Soviet and other foreign warship design practices and the effects of design practices on ship size and cost. Kenneth S. Brower is a partner in Spectrum Associates Incorporated Arlington Virginia which he founded in June 1978. He graduated from the University of Michigan in 1965 with a Bachelor's Degree in Naval Architecture. Mr. Brower has contributed to the design and construction of numerous merchant ships and warships the latter of which include the CG-47 project Arapaho the FDL and DX projects the new NATO Frigates Replacement for the ‘90's DDGX and FFX projects as well as several frigate developed for Foreign Military Sales. Since 1972 he has actively supported the Naval Sea Systems Command's Comparative Naval Architecture Program. During this period Mr. Brower has contribute

There are two principal benefits to conducting comparative engineering analyses of U.S. and foreign ship design practices and criteria: 1) they offer an opportunity to identify clever ideas from which the U.S. can benefit, and 2) they cause us to assess U.S. design practices critically that we may have been taking for granted or may have been accepting as inviolable. The results of a comparative analysis of U.S. and foreign hull form, machinery, and structural design practices are reported in this paper. Numerous studies of U.S. and foreign warships have shown that the hull form, machinery, and structural design practices of various navies differ considerably. Although most large navies operate their ships in generally similar environments, each country has developed its own unique style of hull form. Based on an assessment of foreign hull form design practices, the U.S. Navy has recently developed a style of hull form that offers improved stability and seakeeping performance and which facilitates the arrangement of internal functions. Foreign ships generally have a tighter machinery arrangement than comparable U.S. ships. However, this is not necessarily achieved by accepting less subsystem performance or by sacrificing redundancy. The tightness of foreign machinery plants seems to be achieved by tighter management control over the ship design and acquisition process. In addition, foreign navies appear to be more flexible in adjusting to a new technology such as that which occurred during the change from steam to gas turbine propulsion. U.S. ships appear to be constructed to more rigorous structural detail design standards than foreign ships. The structural configuration of foreign ships, including the integration of web frames, longitudinal girders, and stanchions also differs from U.S. practice. The configuration of ship structure and the value of rigorous U.S. structural design practices are worthy of additional research. The results of the study reported in thi

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

THE APPLICATION OF A PLANNING CONTRACT CONCEPT TO A COMPLEX NAVY SURFACE SHIP OVERHAUL

引用

naval ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1983年第2期95卷 51-65页

作者： NODELL, WR SIAS, PM William R. Nodell USCG (Ret.):graduated from the U. S. COAST GUARD Academy in 1950 receiving a B.S. degree and earned his Master of Sciences and Naval Engineer degrees from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1957. He has served in various line and engineering capacities on board COAST GUARD Cutters in Atlantic Pacific and Alaskan waters. He served in the production department of the COAST GUARD Yard in Curtis Bay Maryland and later was Chief of the Naval Engineering Branches of the 13th COAST GUARD District in Seattle Washington and the 3rd COAST GUARD District New York New York. After retirement he held a position as Manager of the Marine Engineering Department at Atlantic Research Corporation Costa Mesa California and joined Lockheed Shipbuilding and Construction Company in 1973. He was Project Engineer for the Polar Class Icebreakers the AS-41 and the LSD-41 in various stages. He has contributed technical papers to several professional societies. He is currently a member of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers the American Society of Naval Engineers where he served as a past chairman of the Puget Sound Chapter and the National Management Association where he served as a Past President of the local chapter. He is a senior systems engineer at Lockheed. Peter M. Sias:received his B.S. degree in Marine Engineering from Maine Maritime Academy in 1950. Subsequently he completed a NAVY sponsored program in Naval Architecture at the University of California and Department of Defense courses in program management and contract administration at the Air Force Institute of Technology. He served on active duty with the United States Navy during the Korean emergency with assignments as Engineering Officer for a minesweeper and collateral staff duty assignments with the Commander Mineforce U.S. Pacific Fleet for reserve ship activation. Upon release from active duty in 1952 he joined United States Steel Corporation as an Industrial Engineer. In 1955 he accepted a position in the Eng

Early in 1979, the Commander in Chief, United States Pacific Fleet requested that alternate procedures be explored for overhaul of the USS Sacramento (AOE-1). Of particular concern was the availability of the ship to accomplish alterations and repair planning prior to the start of the overhaul and the history of AOE Class ships not being completed in the private sector within the scheduled availability time. The planning type contract concept wherein pre-overhaul tests and inspections, preparation of drawings, procurement of long lead time material and detailed overhauling planning and scheduling would be accomplished by the successful Contractor was one approach requested for major consideration. In July 1979, the decision was made to proceed with the planning contract concept for overhaul of the USS Sacramento. The Request for Proposals (RFP's) were issued to industry in November 1979 with contract award to Lockheed Ship building and Construction Company (LSCC) on 4 February 1980. In September 1980, the overhaul for USS Sacramento was classified by the Navy as “complex”, confirming specific management action and attention to be given during the planning and overhaul phases. This technical paper describes the application of the planning contract concept to the planning and overhaul of USS Sacramento. Actual experiences including issue of the negotiated Request for Proposals (RFP's), performing pre-overhaul test and inspections (POT & I) procedures, accomplishing ship check and drawing preparation, and scheduling, including proper phasing of all elements and critical path analysis, will be reviewed in detail. Comparisons to conventional procedures will be made, along with concepts for modifying the methods employed to custom fit the characteristics of future overhauls. The closure will include a summary of “lessons learned” to date with specific recommendations for application of procedures to future overhauls.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

THE INTRODUCTION OF HEAT RECOVERABLE COUPLINGS TO SHIP REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE

引用

naval ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1982年第6期94卷 63-71页

作者： LIBERATORE, DJ BASKERVILLE, JE LCdr. Donald J. Liberatore USN: began his career in the U.S. Navy in 1965. He has had many diverse assignments involving surface ships and submarines during the past seventeen years. During his tour at Naval Shipyard Portsmouth (N.H.) he was Assistant Design Superintendent and responsible for the introduction of Heat Recoverable Coupling technology into the shipyard. Presently he is assigned to the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) in the Sonar Dome Office. Prior assignments within NAVSEA have been as Assistant Ship Systems Design Manager for the SSNX and FA-SSN preliminary designs in the Submarine Propulsion Analysis Branch in the Submarine Hydrodynamics Branch and in the Gear Coupling and Clutch Branch. He received his Bachelor of Engineering degree from Vanderbilt University in 1971 and in 1977 graduated from Massachusetts Institute of Technology with his M.S. degree in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering and his Professional degree of Ocean Engineer. A member of ASNE since 1975 LCdr. Liberatore also is a member of IEEE SNAME the Naval Institute and Sigma Xi. Cdr. James E. Baskerville USN: is presently assigned to NAVSEA as the Ship Manager for the DDG 51 the Navy's next generation surface combatant. In a previous tour at Naval Shipyard Pearl Harbor he was the Navy's Program Manager for Heat Recoverable Coupling introduction in ship repair and maintenance. A graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy Class of 1969 he is a qualified Surface Warfare Officer and a designated Engineering Duty Officer (ED). He received his M.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering and his Professional degree of Ocean Engineer from Massachusetts Institute of Technology and also holds a patent right on an Electronic Control and Response System. His naval assignments have included tours in the USS Ramey (FFG-2) as Aide and Flag Lieutenant to the Commander Naval Electronic Systems Command and as Ship Superintendent Surface Type Desk Officer and Assistant Design Superintendent at Naval Shipyard Pearl Harbor. Cdr. Baskervi

Although Heat Recoverable Couplings (HRCs), used to join pipe, may be labeled innovative “state-of-the-art” technology for U.S. naval Shipyards, they have been in use in foreign ships and high technology industries for over a decade. HRCs provide a permanent leak-proof pipe joint in specified applications without the use of high temperature and the inherent hazards of an open flame. Manufactured from NITINOL, a nickel-titanium alloy developed by the U.S. Navy, the couplings exhibit a “shape memory” characteristic. That is, they return (shrink) to a specified shape (pipe diameter) thus forming a mechanical seal when the expanded coupling is removed from a cryogenic environment and warmed above approximately —130°C. This paper provides background information into the development of NITINOL, technical explanation of shape memory metallurgy, and a summary of results, with specific examples, describing the trial use of HRCs at Pearl Harbor and Norfolk naval Shipyards. Limited return cost data and recommendations for future use are presented. Then, using the HRC program as a basis, the Authors discuss the conservative nature of the ship repair and maintenance environment. This environment, in the Authors' opinion, couples with complex contractual constraints and requirements which serve to restrict the introduction of new ideas. An analogy is made to Russian tenacity of recent years which promotes “exploring and doing” while we in the U.S. Navy are frequently content to study.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

SEAKEEPING PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF AIR CAPABLE SHIPS

引用

naval ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1982年第2期94卷 101-117页

作者： COMSTOCK, EN BALES, SL GENTILE, DM Mr. Edward N. Comstock:is currently Head of the Hull Form Design and Performance Branch (SEA 3213) of the Naval Sea Systems Command. He received his B.S.E. degree in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering in 1970 and his M.S.E. degree in Ship Hydrodynamics in 1974 both from the University of Michigan. Mr. Comstock began his career with theU.S. Navyin 1974 as a Seakeeping Specialist in the Hull Form and Fluid Dynamics Branch of the former Naval Ship Engineering Center. Achieving his present position in January 1982 Mr. Comstock was previously Head of the Surface Ship Hydrodynamics Section of SEA 3213 being responsible for recent hull form designs including DDG-51 MCM-1 and ARS-50. Before obtaining that position in 1979 Mr. Comstock's efforts were primarily aimed at developing and establishing seakeeping performance assessment and design practices. Prior to his employment by the Navy Mr. Comstock worked in the Structural and Hydrodynamics Group of General Dynamics' Electric Boat Division. A member of ASNE he is also a member of ASE and SNAME and has been active in supporting the efforts of the SNAME H-7 (Seakeeping) Panel SNAME HS-12 (Hull Instrumentation) Panel the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the NATO Armaments Group IEG6/Sub-Group 5 (Seakeeping). Ms. Susan L. Bales:has been associated with the David W. Taylor Naval Ship R&D Center (DTNSRDC) and its predecessor organizations throughout her professional career. She is currently Head of the Ocean Environment Group of the DTNSRDC Surface Ship Dynamics Branch (1561) and also serves as the DTNSRDC Program Manager of the Navy's Exploratory Development Program on Surface Waves. Her work documented by more than fifty technical publications has been directed primarily to ship seakeeping ocean environment and ship performance assessment problems. An internationally recognized authority in her field she is also active in several professional societies as well as the SNAME H-7 (Seakeeping) Panel the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the NA

The on-going debate regarding the merits of large versus small aircraft carriers raises several issues concerning the ability of various ship configurations to support sea based air operations. One such issue is the question of the relative seakeeping performance of ship alternatives. In an effort to shed some light on the matter, a comparative seakeeping assessment of nine air capable ships covering a wide range of size and hull form was performed. An evaluation of the impact of aircraft and ship motion limitations on sea based air operations and a comparison of the relative ability of the ships to conduct air operations while in a seaway are presented. The specific air operations considered are launch, recovery, and support of aircraft. The ships evaluated are CVN-71, CVA-67 (MR), CVV, LHA-1, VSS-D, DDV-2, DDV-1D, DD-963, and SWATH-6. These ships have the combined capability to operate Vertical Takeoff and Landing (VTOL), Conventional Takeoff and Landing (CTOL), Short Takeoff and Arrested Landing (STOAL), and Short Takeoff and Vertical Landing (STOVL) type aircraft. Results indicate that seakeeping performance generally degrades with decreasing displacement, that SWATH-6 performance is the least degraded, that elevator wetness can be an important degrader for ships with lower freeboards, that roll motion can be an important degrader for ships under 60,000 tons, and that percent time of operation is strongly dependent on the prevailing wave and wind environment.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：