检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

Comparative Heave Dynamics Of Two Unusual Ship Configurations For Recovery Of Submersibles

naval Engineers Journal 1971年第5期83卷 30-36页

作者： MOTHERWAY, D.L. HELLER, S.R. D. L. Motherway received his Bachelor of Science Degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Rhode Island in June 1961. He was subsequently employed at General Dynamics/Electric Boat Division Groton Connecticut where he held positions in their Planning Department as a planning engineer for FBM Submarine Construction and in the Mechanical Division as a design engineer. Motherway went to the Naval Ship Engineering Center Washington D. C. in March of 1966 with the Submarine Hydraulics Section of the Hull Design Branch where he participated in the design of submarine hydraulic systems. He later transferred to the Ocean Engineering Section of the Deck Systems Branch where he participated in design related to deep submergence vehicles and ocean salvage and retrieval systems. During this period at NavSEC he received his Master Science Degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Catholic University of America Washington D. C. From April 1970 to May 1971 he was with the Undersea Long-Range Missile System (ULMS) Submarine Design Development Office in the capacity of Assistant Subsystem Design Director. Currently he is the Senior Project Engineer for the ULMS program at the office of the Supervisor of Shipbuilding Conversion and Repair Groton Connecticut. He is a member of ASNE and ASE. S. R. Heller Jr. a retired Engineering Duty Officer of the United States Navy received his undergraduate education at the University of Michigan in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering and in Mathematics. Following typical shipyard duty during World War II he received postgraduate instruction at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology leading to the degrees of Naval Engineer and Doctor of Science in Naval Architecture. Since then he has had design responsibilities in the Bureau of Ships had a maintenance assignment with the Fleet directed structural research at the David Taylor Model Basin engaged in submarine design and construction at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard and was the last Head of Hull Design in the

The comparative heaving characteristics of two unusual ship configurations, a spar‐type ship similar to FLIP and a catamaran which employs a submerged cradle suspended by sophisticated motion attenuation devices, for recovery of small submersibles are presented. The two ships are described and their heaving characteristics are determined analytically using classical vibration theory. © 1971 American Society of naval Engineers

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

CATAMARANS - DREAM OR REALITY

引用

naval ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1970年第3期82卷 95-&页

作者： BOND, JR USN THE AUTHOR is currently assigned as the CVAN Ship Design Manager on the staff of the Assistant for Ship Design Ship Systems Engineering and Design Department Naval Ship Engineering Center. He is the Project Director for the CVAN-71 Concept Formulation Program which will produce the design for the follow on ships to the NIMITZ (CVAN-68) Class. He graduated from the University of Illinois in 1955 and completed postgraduate work at Webb Institute of Naval Architecture in 1962. He holds a BSME a BS in Marine Engineering and an MS in Naval Architecture. He is a registered Professional Engineer in the state of Virginia. He has had sea tours in a destroyer and an Attack Aircraft Carrier and shore tours at the U. S. Naval Academy and the Norfolk Naval Shipyard.

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

THE naval SHIPYARD COMPLEX

引用

naval Engineers Journal 1970年第6期82卷 25-30页

作者： DOLAN, JOHN W. REAR ADMIRAL THE AUTHOR graduated from the U. S. Naval Academy in June 1939 and was commissioned Ensign. He subsequently advanced in rank attaining that of Rear Admiral to date from January 1 1967. His first assignment was aboard the USS PENSACOLA the heavy cruiser operating in the Pacific when the U. S. entered World War II. Detached from the PENSACOLA in May 1942 he received postgraduate instruction in naval architecture and marine engineering at M. I. T. where he earned his M. S. degree in 1944. Designated for Engineering Duty Only in that year he was assigned in November to the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard to serve in connection with aircraft carrier construction and ship repair until November 1946. The next month he joined the Staff of Commander Service Force U.S. Pacific as Fleet Maintenance Officer and in August 1949 reported as Production Assistant to the Director of the Ship Technical Division Bureau of Ships Navy Department. He was Assistant Repair Superintendent at the Charleston (South Carolina) Naval Shipyard for a two-year period ending in July 1956 after which time he attended the Naval War College Newport Rhode Island. Completing the course in June 1957 he was assigned to Puget Sound (Washington) Naval Shipyard. In August 1960 he became Shipbuilding Assistant to the Assistant Chief of the Bureau of Ships for Design Shipbuilding and Fleet Maintenance Navy Department and in April 1963 was detached for duty as Commander San Francisco Naval Shipyard. In December 1965 he assumed command of the Long Beach Naval Shipyard and in October 1967 reported as Fleet Maintenance Officer/Assistant Chief of Staff for Maintenance and Logistic Plans Staff Commander in Chief U. S. Atlantic Fleet. He also held the additional duty as Maintenance Officer Staff Commander in Chief Atlantic and Commander in Chief Western Atlantic. In August 1969 he was ordered for his present duty as Deputy Commander for Field Activities Program Director for Shipyard Modernization and Management Naval Ships Sy

The U. S. naval Shipyards are a tremendous industrial capability, of irreplaceable value to the Fleet. Their specific capabilities have been tailored to meet the needs of a changing mix of ship types that make up the Fleet today, and the modernization program now underway is keyed to the needs of the Fleet of the future. The workforce in the naval shipyards contains skills and expertise necessary to the maintenance of the complex weapons systems essential to a modern Navy. There are programs to keep the workforce current in an everchanging technology, and also to insure a constant input of trained personnel. The continuation of the naval Shipyard system, ready and capable to support the fleet, is as important an ingredient of National Defense as the continuation of the Fleet itself. © 1970 by the American Society of naval Engineers, Inc.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

The Hull‐Propeller Relationship of the Oceanographic Research Ship T‐Agor

引用

naval Engineers Journal 1966年第5期78卷 851-860页

作者： SARCHIN, T.H. The Author is head of the Technical Support Section Ship Concept Design Division of Naval Ship Engineering Center. His group is responsible for conducting special studies relative to design problems and participating in the Ship Systems Command's RDT&E program in the area of ship hydrodynamics. His educational background includes a BS in Aeronautical Engineering from the University of Washington and graduate study at Catholic University and the University of Maryland. He has over 28 years of continuous experience in the Bureau of Ships and is a member of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers before whom he recently presented a paper on “The Stability of Naval Ships.” He is also a charter member of the ASE and is a registered Professional Engineer in the District of Columbia.

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

A SYSTEMS APPROACH TO HULL STRUCTURE DESIGN

引用

naval ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1970年第5期82卷 59-&页

作者： RAWAT, P who began his education in his native India received a Bachelor of Technology degree with honors from the Indian Institute of Technology in 1957. His subsequent education includes S. M.‘s in Industrial Management and Naval Architecture & Marine Engineering from M. I. T. in 1961 and a professional degree in Naval Architecture from the same institution in 1965. Rawat's career began as a Naval Architect in preliminary design with the Hamburg firm of Howladtswerke in 1958. A year later he performed as a research assistant in M. I. T.'s School of Industrial Management for a Ford Foundation Project for a top management training program for India. After this two-year period he acted as the head of the Department Head of Engineering at the Ghana Nautical College in West Africa until 1963. He returned to M. I. T. afterwards to work as a research assistant in Naval Architecture on structural optimization programs. From 1965 to 1966 he filled the capacity of Naval Architecture with M. Rosenblatt & Son in the area of structural design on such projects as MOHOLE AGOR 14 and Catamaran Hull. Since 1966 Rawat has been working in various capacities with Litton Industries: Senior Naval Architect on the FDL Project Section Manager of Hull Structures for the LHA and DD Projects and his present position as Section Manager for Computer Aided Ship Design.

Many useful conclusions can be drawn if hull structural design is considered as a system. Proper definition of system objectives enables setting up of meaningful long range and intermediate goals. Current state-of-art in systems engineering is such that the system objectives can be denned in mathematical form. This provides meaningful scales for progress measurement. The engineering function is to meet the goals set by systems engineering. The state-of-art in engineering has a considerable impact on the definition of system objectives. In recent times we have made considerable progress in developing analytical techniques. Many interesting conclusions result from our experience in using the analytical tools in an iterative manner for design. By using relatively simple algorithms for iteration the analytical processes can be sequenced in such a manner that optimum solution is guaranteed even under a large and complex set of design constraints. Use of computers makes it possible to generate the scantlings using iterative approach with such speed that many important structural configuration decisions can be made by means of thorough parametric analyses. The system objectives therefore are very different in scope today and they should be further modified as technology advances. There are several problems that can be recognized and solved in the systems context. Smooth man-machine operation is an example of this.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Reliability analysis

引用

naval Engineers Journal 1962年第N 4期v 74卷 p619-627页

作者： Frankel, E.G. The author a graduate of the University of London (England) served in the British Royal Navy during World War II and later worked for 4 years in shipbuilding and turbine construction. Later the author joined ZIM Israel Nov. Co. as Chief Engineer and Engineer Superintendent before returning to complete his graduate study at Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1959. Since 1961 he has been a member of the faculty of the Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering M.I.T.

Fundamental concepts that may be used in reliability analysis of marine systems;failure is inferred to mean operation outside assigned tolerances within given lifetime;tolerances are defined for each characteristic of system and include wear consideration and other factors as functions of time;where mean time before failure of small sample, which has to be amplified by analytical data is given, more stringent tests for confidence are required than where any number of components can be tested to failure;note on confidence test of reliability predictions is included.

关键词： Reliability

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

SHIPYARD MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR IMPROVED OVERHAUL EFFICIENCY

引用

naval ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1969年第6期81卷 37-&页

作者： COX, AE Mr. A. E. Cox has twenty-eight years of technical and technical management experience in the shipbuilding industry. Since joining Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company in 1941 upon graduation from College he has participated in the design of all aircraft carriers built at NNS&DDCo starting with the Essex Class (CV-9) and progressing through the baby flat top LONG ISLAND the Midway Class (CVB-41) the Forrestal Class (CVA-59) the ENTERPRISE (CVA(N)65) the AMERICA (CVA-66) and the KENNEDY (CVA-67). He served as an officer in the U. S. Naval Reserves during World War II. His primary assignment was as a ship superintendent in new construction. With this and other experience as his credentials earlier this year he was promoted to senior program Manager responsible for the coordination of the activities of all of the program Managers. He is registered professional engineer in the State of Virginia. He holds a bachelors degree in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering from Webb Institute of Naval Architecture and is a graduate of the Oak Ridge School of Reactor Technology. He completed the Management Course at the Graduate School of Industrial Administration Carnegie Tech. and has taken graduate courses at George Washington University University of Michigan and the University of Virginia.

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

An Application of the Series Turbine to a Highspeed naval Combatant Ship

引用

naval Engineers Journal 1971年第2期83卷 33-42页

作者： ELLIOTT, J.K. USN J. K. ELLIOTT attended Ohio University for a year then entered the U.S. Naval Academy in 1957. After graduation from the Academy in 1961 he was assigned to USS LAWRENCE (DDG-4) in which he served as division officer and department head. In 1965 he was transferred to Webb Institute of Naval Architecture where in 1968 he graduated with a B.S. in Marine Engineering and an M.S. in Naval Architecture. Following graduate school he was sent to the U.S. Navy Diving and Salvage School and then to the Naval Ship Research and Development Center (NAVSHIPRANDCEN) where he served as the Officer-in-Charge of the UEB-1 and Program Officer for the Underwater Explosions Research Division. While attached to NAVSHIPRANDCEN he spent several months in South Vietnam as leader of the Navy Battle Damage Assessment and Reporting Team. In July of 1970 he was transferred to the Norfolk Naval Shipyard where he is now serving as a Ship Production Coordinator.

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

THE AIRCRAFT CARRIER

引用

naval Engineers Journal 1963年第1期75卷 137-148页

作者： NACHTSHEIM, JOHN J. MIEHE, F.W. WILSON, COMMANDER T. B. Mr. John J. Nachtsheim is Chief Naval Architect of the Hull Design Branch of the Bureau of Ships. Prior to this position he held the position of Deputy Chief Design Engineer at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard. He received his Bachelor of Science degree in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering from Webb Institute of Naval Architecture and a Bachelor of Law degree from the George Washington University Law School. He was civilian project coordinator for the Hull Design Branch for the design of USS Enterprise CVA(N)65 and has been engaged in hull design for the Navy since 1948. Commander Frederick W. Miehe Jr. U. S. Navy is a student in the Navy Graduate Financial Management Program at The George Washington University. Prior to entering this program he was project officer for major combatant ships in the Machinery Design Branch Bureau of Ships. Earlier duty assignments include shipyards staff and shipboard engineering as well as a brief interlude flying blimps. He received the Bachelor of Science degree at the United States Naval Academy in 1943 and the Degree of Naval Engineer at Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1949. Lieut. Commander Thomas B. Wilson Jr. U. S. Navy is project officer for aircraft carriers in the Hull Design Branch Bureau of Ships. He received his Bachelor of Science degree at the United States Naval Academy in 1948 and his Master of Science degree at Webb Institute of Naval Architecture in 1953. He has been concerned with the construction conversion repairing docking and operation of aircraft carriers since 1951.

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

PLANNING AND engineering FOR REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS (PERA)

引用

naval ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1969年第6期81卷 28-&页

作者： KERN, DH Cleveland Ohio March 9–13 of the American Society of Mechanical Engia B. S. Degree in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering and in 1950 he returned for three years postgraduate training following which in 1952 he was awarded a Professional Engineering Degree in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering. In 1968 he completed the Advanced Management Program at Harvard. As an Engineering Duty Officer he has served in various Naval commands. Following the war he was assigned as Planning and Estimating Hull Assistant at Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard and as Assistant Design Superintendent at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard. He has had two tours of duty at the Naval Ship Systems Command formerly the Bureau of Ships. Since March 1969 he has been assigned to duty as Commander Portsmouth Naval Shipyard Portsmouth N. H.

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：