检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

Annual business and news:: Beginning the 31st year of the Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics

JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS 2008年第1期31卷 1-1页

作者： Schmidt, George T. Aeronautics and Astronautics Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) AIAA Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Russian Federation Academy of Navigation and Motion Control Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics University of Missouri-Rolla(UMR) Lockheed Electronics Company Center for Space Research University of Texas Austin United States Wright Laboratory Eglin Air Force Base UMR AIAA Guidance Navigation and Control Technical Committee American Automatic Control Council Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Palmdale CA United States C4ISR and Unmanned Air Vehicle (UAV) Programs for Air Vehicle Sciences and Systems Accreditation Board Engineering and Technology Inc./Aeronautical National Technical Committee on Guidance Navigation and Control Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University at Buffalo State University of New York (SUNY) AIAA Technical Committee on GN and C Air Vehicles Directorate Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) Wright-Patterson Air Force Base Space Access and Hypersonic Vehicle Guidance and Control Group Control Science Center of Excellence AFRL AIAA Technical Committee on Guidance Navigation and Control Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering University of California (UC) Davis United States Boeing Company Modernized Flight Control System for the Apache Longbow AIAA Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers AHS Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Boeing Company Flight Sciences and Advanced Design Group Guidance Navigation and Control (GN and C) Systems Engineer Distributed Space Systems NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) AIAA GN and C Technical Committee Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics University of Texas Austin United States Institute of Navigation American Astronautical Society AIAA Guidance Navigation (GN and C) and Control Technical Committee Department of Aerospace Engineering Iowa State University Iowa

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Advances in POST2 End-to-End Descent and Landing Simulation for the ALHAT Project

Advances in POST2 End-to-End Descent and Landing Simulation ...

引用

作者： Davis, Jody L. Striepe, Scott A. Maddock, Robert W. Hines, Glenn D. Paschall II, Stephen Cohanim, Babak E. Fill, Thomas Johnson, Michael C. Bishop, Robert H. DeMars, Kyle J. Sostaric, Ronald R. Johnson, Andrew E. NASA Langley Research Center Hampton VA 23681 United States Charles Stark Draper Laboratory Cambridge MA 02139 United States University of Texas at Austin Austin TX 78712 United States NASA Johnson Space Center Houston TX 77058 United States Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena CA 91109 United States Atmospheric Flight and Entry Systems Branch MS 489 United States Flight Software Systems Branch MS 472 United States GNC Systems-Mission Design United States Space Systems MS 27 555 Technology Square United States GN and C Systems Division MS 70 United States Aerospace G and C 555 Technology Square MS 70 United States Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics WRW215FA United States Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics WRW411C United States Flight Mechanics and Trajectory Design Branch Mailcode EG5 United States Optical Navigation Group-GN and C Section MS 301-121 United States

ISBN: (纸本)9781563479458

Program to Optimize Simulated Trajectories II (POST2) is used as a basis for an end-to- end descent and landing trajectory simulation that is essential in determining design and integration capability and system performance of the lunar descent and landing system and environment models for the Autonomous Landing and Hazard Avoidance Technology (ALHAT) project. The POST2 simulation provides a six degree-of-freedom capability necessary to test, design and operate a descent and landing system for successful lunar landing. This paper presents advances in the development and model-implementation of the POST2 simulation, as well as preliminary system performance analysis, used for the testing and evaluation of ALHAT project system models.

关键词： Degrees of freedom (mechanics)

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

The jpl roadmap for deep space navigation

The jpl roadmap for deep space navigation

引用

Spaceflight Mechanics 2006 - AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechnaics Meeting

作者： Martin-Mur, Tomas J. Abraham, Douglas S. Berry, David Bhaskaran, Shyam Cesarone, Robert J. Wood, Lincoln J. Services Program Office Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology 4800 Oak Grove Drive Pasadena CA 91109 United States Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Interplanetary Network Directorate Jet Propulsion Laboratory Navigation and Mission Design System Engineering Group California Institute of Technology Guidance Navigation and Control Section Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology

ISBN: (纸本)0877035288

This paper reviews the projected set of deep space missions that will be supported by NASA's Deep Space mission system in the next twenty-five years, and extracts the driving set of navigation capabilities that these missions will require. There will be many challenges including the support of new mission navigation approaches such as formation flying and rendezvous in deep space, low-energy and low-thrust orbit transfers, precise landing and ascent vehicles, and autonomous navigation. Innovative strategies and approaches will be needed to develop and field advanced navigation capabilities.

关键词： Space research

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

The redefinition of supportability and its role as a systems engineering tool

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1999年第3期111卷 269-277页

作者： Blackwell, P Hausner, E Paul Blackwell:graduated in May 1985 from Michigan Technological University with a bachelor of science degree in electrical engineering. In Octover 1986 Paul took a position in inertial navigation engineering at the Naval took a position in inertial navigation engineering at the Naval Aviation Depot. Five years later he move to the Mission Software group where he worked developing tactical navigation software. W. Erich Hausner:is currently the Project Engineer—Producibility and Supportability Research. Erich's primary focus has been producibility and supportability research and life cycle cost analyses for various aircraft and space programs. He integrates producibility and supportability domain experts within systems engineering/design leads research and development in advanced producibility and supportability concepts and works with producibility and supportability engineers to define design. requirements. He developed the Knowledge-Aided Producibility/Supportability Analysis Technique (KPAT/KSAT). The International Society of Logistics awarded him with the prestigious Field Award for Concurrent Engineering and the Best Technical Paper—Acquisition and Support. He is a member of the Office of Naval Research—Best Manufacturing Practices—Producibility Task Force. He majored in physics at the New York Institute of Technology.

Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) is described as the cornerstone of time NAVAIR, NAVSEA, and SPAWAR Affordable Readiness Initiatives. However, many technical issues, which result in a significant impact to the Fleet's Readiness and Operations and Support Costs, are irrelevant to RCM analyses and are therefore overlooked. In addition, reliability and maintainability, parameters more suitable as a "figure of merit" in a laboratory environment, are used with fervor to analyze field data. This further compounds the ambiguity and diminishes the effectiveness of the RCM recommendations on readiness and cost In other words, using RCM "we are potentially stepping over dollars to save pennies." Supportability is traditionally thought of as a logistics metric related to the operational availability of a system. This paper redefines Supportability, describes the comprehensive Knowledge-Aided Supportability Analysis Technique (KSAT), and discusses how it can enhance the traditional metrics.

关键词： Decision support systems

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Operational systems, logistics engineering and technology insertion

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1997年第3期109卷 205-220页

作者： Grubb, MJ Skolnick, A Michael J. Grubb:has perfomzed naval engineering at the Crane Division Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC) for more than twenty-five years. He currently the program manager for the Sustainable Hardware and Affordable Readiness Practice Program (SHARP). is a Navy-wide logistics research and development prgram aimed at the successful transiton of proved technologies inot the fleet. SHARP focuses on reducing acquisition performance capability reliability maintainability and readiness of these systems. Mr. Grubb has served as a department director for the past eleven years. His most recent assignment was as director of the Tactical Computer Resources and Test Equipment Department. This organization provided acquisition and in-service engineering support of the Navy's tectical embedded computers priphirals displays and mass memory storage devices. The organization also provided a complete range of product engineering and metrology engineerig services for SSP NevSeaSysCom and the Trident Program. Prior to this appointment Mr. Grubb was deptuy director psysical security programs department and site responsible for program management and system integration of ashore integrated security systems. Mr. Grubb holds a B.S. degree in industrial engineering from Iowa State Universtiy an M.S. degree in industrial engineering from Purdue University and has copleted the course work (Dec.'96 for a master's degree in public and environment affairs at Indiana University-Purdue Univeristy Indianapolis. Dr. Alfred Skolnick operates System Science Consultants (SSC) specilizing in strategic planning technical program definiton technology assessment and engineering analyses on selected matters of national interest. He has taught physics mathematics and management sciences at University of Virginia and Marymount University and is currently adjunct professor of mathematics at Northern Virginia Community College. Form 1985 to 1989 he was president of the American Society of Noval Engineers. Dr. Skolnick served at Applied Physic

In an era of fiscal austerity, downsizing and unforgiving pressure upon human and economic capital, it is an Augean task to identify resources for fresh and creative work. The realities of the day and the practical demands of more immediate fleet needs can often dictate higher priorities. Yet, the Navy must avoid eating its seed corn. Exercising both technical insight and management foresight, the fleet, the R&D community, the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (OpNav) and the product engineering expertise of the Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC) are joined and underway with integrated efforts to marry new, fully demonstrated technologies and operational urgencies. Defense funding today cannot sponsor all work that can be mission-justified over the long term because budgets are insufficient to support product maturation within the classical development cycle. However, by rigorous technical filtering and astute engineering of both marketplace capabilities and currently available components, it is possible in a few select cases to compress and, in effect, integrate advanced development (6.3), engineering development (6.4), weapon procurement (WPN), ship construction (SCN), operation and maintenance (O&M,N) budgetary categories when fleet criticalities and technology opportunities can happily meet. In short, 6.3 funds can be applied directly to ''ripe gateways'' so modern technology is inserted into existing troubled or aging systems, sidestepping the lengthy, traditional development cycle and accelerating practical payoffs to recurrent fleet problems. To produce such constructive results has required a remarkable convergence of sponsor prescience and engineering workforce excellence. The paper describes, extensively, the philosophy of approach, transition strategy, polling of fleet needs, technology assessment, and management team requirements. The process for culling and selecting specific candidate tasks for SHARP sponsorship (matching operational need with t

关键词： Naval vessels

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Affordability, logistics R&D and fleet systems

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1996年第3期108卷 199-213页

作者： Schulte, DP Skolnick, A He has supported the development and operation of several naval systems including advanced component selection for Trident II fire control and navigation systems. He served as branch manager of the Surface Ship ASW Combat System Branch which acted as the acquisition engineering agent for the AN/SQQ-89 Surface Ship Anti-Submarine Warfare Weapon System. He was then selected to manage the Module Engineering Department which provided engineering support to numerous naval systems including the AN/BSY-1 Submarine Combat System and the Trident II fire control and navigation system. He then served as the deputy program manager for NAVSEA Progressive Maintenance (2M/ATE). He holds a B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Purdue University and currently is pursuing a Maste's degree in Public Environmental Affairs at Indiana University—Purdue University Indianapolis. He served at Applied Physics Laboratory/The Johns Hopkins University in missile development then aboard USS Boston (CAG-1) and played leading roles in several weapon system developments (Regulus Terrier Tartar Talos) inertial navigation (Polaris) deep submergence (DSRV) and advanced ship designs (SES). He later was director Combat System Integration Naval Sea Systems Command and head Combat Projects Naval Ship Engineering Center. He led the Navy's High Energy Lasers and Directed Energy Weapons development efforts. He was vice president advanced technology at Operations Research Inc. and vice president maritime engineering at Defense Group Inc. before starting SSC in 1991. Dr. Skolnick holds a B.S. degree in Mathematics and Economics Queens College an M.A. degree in Mathematics and Philosophy Columbia University an M.S. degree in Electrical/Aeronautical Engineering U.S. Naval Postgraduate School and a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering and Applied Mathematics from Polytechnic University in New York. He is the author of many published papers on engineering design issues source selection procedures and large-scale complex technology problems

The Fleet continues to require high performance systems that can operate with dependability in the seas' unforgiving environments and under hostile action. Those demands are not new. What has changed is the urgent priority formerly assigned to national defense issues. The arguments for continued superpower military strength are now roiled in politics along with unsettled budgets and uncertain force level projections. Current expectations revolve about indefinite fiscal and operational issues (difficult funding constraints and broadband threats). In the actual event of ''doing more with less,'' a practical response is to apply the creative power available from sound engineering judgement and the crucible of experience to the immediate needs of the Fleet. The attempt to shorten the path between advanced development effort and Fleet use has been tried occasionally in the past, often, without exemplary results. The Sustainable Hardware and Affordable Readiness Practices (SHARP) program, is a generic R&D effort under OpNav sponsorship that has been working steadily on sensible solutions to product engineering problems. Armed today with fast-time, large-scale computation abilities and modern tools for technical problem solving coupled with specialized engineering knowledge, it has been refreshed and is underway satisfying existing Fleet needs. The relationship between fully responsive engineering services and current operational needs is always demanding. The connection between advanced engineering development (6.3 category funds) and immediate Fleet usage brings added complexity and challenge, both technical and organizational. Illustrative examples of affordable engineering solutions to ''retain, revise, replace or retire'' questions are presented within the context of both Fleet realities and budgetary limitations. The discussion covers legacy system support, civil/military considerations and Fleet maintenance issues. It describes the substantial and critical payoffs i

关键词： Warships

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

ACQUISITION REFORM AND BEST PRODUCT PROCUREMENT - AN engineering VIEW

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1994年第6期106卷 41-57页

作者： FISHER, DA SKOLNICK, A He has been involved with several weapon system developments. Among these were the Trident II fire control and navigation systems the BSY-I Anti-Submarine Warfare System and the Navy standard computers (UYK44 and EMSP). He served as manager of the Digital Circuits Engineering Branch and was then appointed as manager of the Automatic Test Equipment (ATE) Technology Division. As manager of the ATE Technology Division he was responsible for the SP-23 Fire Control System Support Project the SP-24 Navigation Project and the Fleet Progressive Maintenance Program (2M/ATE). This Division was responsible for selection and application of electronic product technology and for developing fleet test and repair techniques. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Evansville and is currently pursuing a Masters of Public Administration at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis. Dr. Alfred Skolnick:retired from the Navy in 1983 with the rank of captain. He is president of System Science Consultants (SSC) specializing in strategic planning technical program definition technology assessment and engineering analyses on selected matters of national interest. Dr. Skolnick taught mathematics and management sciences at University of Virginia and Marymount University. He is adjunct faculty at Northern Virginia Community College. From 1985 to 1989 he was president of the American Society of Naval Engineers. In the Navy he served at Applied Physics Laboratory/The Johns Hopkins University then aboard USSBoston(CAG-1) and played leading roles in several weapon system developments inertial navigation (Polaris) deep submergence (DSRV) and advanced ship designs (SES). He later was director Combat System Integration Naval Sea Systems Command and head Combat Projects Naval Ship Engineering Center. In 1975 he became a major project manager and led the Navy's High Energy Lasers Program in 1981 he was assigned all Navy Directed Energy Weapons development efforts. He was vice president advanced tech

The military services are being moved in the direction of performance-based specifications and standards. They are being steered against dictating ''how to'' produce an item since such action forecloses on the ability to gain access to components or technology that may have a commercial equivalent. Why should the engineering community embrace the new approach? Aside from the obvious weight of it being approved policy, therefore currently mandated, it warrants examination because it is the correct approach at this time when applied to appropriate products. Military specifications and standards are to be displaced then, by acceptable alternative contractor design solutions. Industry bidders will be allowed to propose the particular design details, permitting procurement flexibility by contractually citing only system level or interface requirements, both physical and functional. Hopefully, this can broaden the industrial base and increase competition with reduced costs to follow. Conceptually, the approach appears both performance-sensible and cost-attractive (there are, of course, consequent risks) but how does implementation proceed? Is it possible to pursue the goals envisioned along paths that are not in themselves experimental? Can the American postulate, minimal loss of life and limb to U.S. military people, continue to be honored? Experience and track record elsewhere imply encouraging possibilities in select situations-useful prospects are identified and discussed in practical terms.

关键词：

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

THE NPS AUV-II AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLE TESTBED - design AND EXPERIMENTAL-VERIFICATION

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1992年第3期104卷 191-202页

作者： HEALEY, AJ GOOD, MR Dr. Anthony J. Healey:was graduated from London and Sheffield Universities with the degrees B.Sc.(Eng.j and Ph.D. in mechanical engineering in 1961 and 1966 respectively. He emigrated to the U.S. in 1966 and has taught at The Pennsylvania State University MIT The University of Texas at Austin and the Naval Postgraduate School. He was promoted to full professor of mechanical engineering in 1974 at the University of Texas at Austin and in 1981 he joined Brown and Root Inc. as manager of the Pipeline and Sub-Sea Technology Research Group. In 1986 he assumed his present position as professor and chairman of mechanical engineering at the U.S. Naval Postgraduate School. His areas of specialty include mechanical system dynamics vibration and control systems and he is presently the leader of an Interdisciplinary Project in Mission Planning Navigation and Control for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles at NPS. Lt. Michael R. Good:is an engineering duty officer assigned to Puget Sound Naval Shipyard. He graduated from Marquette University in 1983 with a B.S. degree in mechanical engineering. He has served on the USS Jack Williams (FFG-24) as ordnance officer and damage control assistant. He obtained the master of science in mechanical engineering degree from the Naval Postgraduate School in 1989 during which time he was the chairman of the Monterey Peninsula Section of ASNE. He is currently assigned as senior ship superintendent and docking officer.

The design, construction and testing of an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) for use as a research and development testbed at the Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) is presented. design objectives, analysis and trade-offs are discussed with respect to a generic AUV with specific details for the case of the NPS AUV II. system integration and flexibility are emphasized in the subject vehicle to support presently planned and future research employment. Hull, mobility, sensors, automatic control, and energy subsystems are described. design and fabrication techniques for the NPS AUV II vehicle hull and equipment are documented. Some results from an experimental program illustrating verification of vehicle design are described.

关键词： Submersibles

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

SHIP SERVICE ELECTRICAL systemS - designING FOR SURVIVABILITY

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1990年第5期102卷 32-36页

作者： CERMINARA, J KOTACKA, RO John Cerminara:is a principal engineer with Westinghouse Machinery Technology Division Electrical Systems Department. He holds a B.S. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Pittsburgh. He is a registered professional engineer and a member of IEEE ASNE and the Ship Steering Group of the Combat Survivability Division of ADPA. Mr. Cerminara has had over 30 years of multidiscipline experience ranging from engineering and construction in heavy industry to standards and publications. Past assignments include DOE/ NASA wind turbine project manager for Westinghouse and task leader of MTD electrical systems. Most recent assignments have included hull mechanical and electrical (HM&E) distributive system survivability analyses of the LSD-41 mobility mission area and application and validation of NavSea computer-aided design of Survivable Distributive System (CADSDiS) Program. Rolf O. Kotacka:is presently a ship systems engineer in the Ship Systems Engineering Branch of the Naval Sea Systems Command Engineering Directorate where his primary responsibility is ship system survivability. He is a 1977 graduate of SUNY Maritime College where he received his bachelor of engineering degree in marine electrical engineering as well as a U.S. Coast Guard Third Assistant Engineer License and a commission in the U. S. Naval Reserve. Upon graduation Mr. Kotacka was employed by Charleston Naval Shipyard as a field engineer until 1981 where he gained his background in surface ship HM&E systems and equipment. He then transferred to the Supervisor of Shipbuilding Conversion and Repair Groton where he served as a senior electrical engineer monitoring the design and construction of Trident and 688 class submarines and received the Meritorious Unit Citation. Prior to his present position Mr. Kotacka was the life cycle manager for diesel generator sets in the Naval Sea Systems Command's Generators Branch. He has coauthored several papers dealing with power generation for ASE and SNAME. Mr. Kotacka is also a lieutena

This paper highlights the survivability concerns in the design of ship service power systems. The paper gives a brief description of what constitutes a typical ship service electric power system and concentrates on electric power generation and associated controls. Established survivability design principles and guidelines are highlighted and the application of those guidelines are discussed. General Specifications (Gen Specs) for Ships of the U.S. Navy are cited as the cornerstone for design. Specific design criteria are cited as well as the rationale associated with the survivability design guidelines pertaining to power generation and distribution. The application of these survivability design guidelines plus the use of the deactivation diagram/damage tolerance analysis cited in the Gen Spec section 072e will enhance overall design and help ensure survivable electric power systems for surface combatants.

关键词： Warships

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

AIR-CUSHION LANDING CRAFT navigation

引用

NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL 1985年第4期97卷 248-260页

作者： GRAHAM, HR KIM, JC BAND, EGU FOWLER, AW Herbert R. Graham:received his degrees of B.S. in 1951 and M.S. in 1958 in aeronautical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the California Institute of Technology respectively. He also attended the Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration. He is presently a task manager at TRW Inc. McLean Virginia responsible for landing craft air cushion (LCAC) engineering support. Since joining TRW in 1967 he has had several technical project management and system engineering responsibilities in amphibious ships transportation and energy. He was responsible for the preliminary engineering design and cost estimates for tracked air cushion vehicles (TACVs). He has been active in several professional societies including ASNE and served as vice-chairman Los Angeles Section American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. John C. Kim:received his degrees of B.S. in electrical engineering Tri-State University 1959 M.S. in electrical engineering Michigan State University 1960 and Ph.D. in electrical engineering Michigan State University. He is presently a senior staff engineer with TRW Inc. McLean Virginia where his technical experience has included communications system engineering and navigation system analysis. Since joining TRW in 1969 he has held numerous positions including section head project manager and department manager. His previous employment includes E-Systems/Melpar Division and Honeywell. Dr. Kim has been active in the IEEE Washington Chapter activities which included secretary vice-chairman and chairman of Systems Science and Cybernetics Group. Edward G.U. Band:received a B.S. degree in mechnical engineering in 1946 and a D.I.C in aeronautical engineering in 1947 at the City and Guilds College of London University. In 1951 he received an M.S. degree from Stevens Institute of Technology in fluid dynamics. After a career in the aircraft industry in England Canada and the U.S.A. he spent several years teaching in Chile and at Webb Institute of Naval Archi

Air cushion vehicles (ACVs) have operated successfully on commercial routes for about twenty years. The routes are normally quite short; the craft are equipped with radar and radio navigation aids and maintain continuous contact with their terminals. navigation of these craft, therefore, does not present any unusual difficulty. The introduction of air cushion vehicles into military service, however, can present a very different picture, especially when external navigation aids are not available and the craft must navigate by dead reckoning. This paper considers the problems involved when navigating a high-speed air cushion vehicle by dead reckoning in conditions of poor visibility. A method is presented to assess the ACV's navigational capability under these circumstances. A figure of merit is used to determine the sensitivity of factors which affect navigation such as the range of visibility, point-to-point distance, speed, turning radius and accuracy of onboard equipment. The method provides simplistic but adequate answers and can be used effectively to compare the-capability and cost of alternative navigation concepts.

关键词： AIR CUSHION VEHICLES

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：