检索结果-内蒙古大学图书馆

Cosmic-Ray Boron Flux Measured from 8.4 GeV/n to 3.8 TeV/n with the Calorimetric Electron Telescope on the International Space Station

引用

Physical Review Letters 2022年第25期129卷 251103-251103页

作者： O. Adriani Y. Akaike K. Asano Y. Asaoka E. Berti G. Bigongiari W. R. Binns M. Bongi P. Brogi A. Bruno J. H. Buckley N. Cannady G. Castellini C. Checchia M. L. Cherry G. Collazuol G. A. de Nolfo K. Ebisawa A. W. Ficklin H. Fuke S. Gonzi T. G. Guzik T. Hams K. Hibino M. Ichimura K. Ioka W. Ishizaki M. H. Israel K. Kasahara J. Kataoka R. Kataoka Y. Katayose C. Kato N. Kawanaka Y. Kawakubo K. Kobayashi K. Kohri H. S. Krawczynski J. F. Krizmanic P. Maestro P. S. Marrocchesi A. M. Messineo J. W. Mitchell S. Miyake A. A. Moiseev M. Mori N. Mori H. M. Motz K. Munakata S. Nakahira J. Nishimura S. Okuno J. F. Ormes S. Ozawa L. Pacini P. Papini B. F. Rauch S. B. Ricciarini K. Sakai T. Sakamoto M. Sasaki Y. Shimizu A. Shiomi P. Spillantini F. Stolzi S. Sugita A. Sulaj M. Takita T. Tamura T. Terasawa S. Torii Y. Tsunesada Y. Uchihori E. Vannuccini J. P. Wefel K. Yamaoka S. Yanagita A. Yoshida K. Yoshida W. V. Zober Department of Physics Department of Physics University of Florence Via Sansone 1–50019 Sesto Fiorentino Italy INFN Sezione di Florence Via Sansone 1–50019 Sesto Fiorentino Italy Waseda Research Institute for Science and Engineering Waseda University 17 Kikuicho Shinjuku Tokyo 162-0044 Japan JEM Utilization Center Human Spaceflight Technology Directorate Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency 2-1-1 Sengen Tsukuba Ibaraki 305-8505 Japan Institute for Cosmic Ray Research The University of Tokyo 5-1-5 Kashiwa-no-Ha Kashiwa Chiba 277-8582 Japan Department of Physical Sciences Earth and Environment University of Siena via Roma 56 53100 Siena Italy INFN Sezione di Pisa Polo Fibonacci Largo B. Pontecorvo 3–56127 Pisa Italy Department of Physics and McDonnell Center for the Space Sciences Washington University One Brookings Drive St. Louis Missouri 63130-4899 USA Heliospheric Physics Laboratory NASA/GSFC Greenbelt Maryland 20771 USA Center for Space Sciences and Technology University of Maryland Baltimore County 1000 Hilltop Circle Baltimore Maryland 21250 USA Astroparticle Physics Laboratory NASA/GSFC Greenbelt Maryland 20771 USA Center for Research and Exploration in Space Sciences and Technology NASA/GSFC Greenbelt Maryland 20771 USA Institute of Applied Physics (IFAC) National Research Council (CNR) Via Madonna del Piano 10 50019 Sesto Fiorentino Italy Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University 202 Nicholson Hall Baton Rouge Louisiana 70803 USA Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Padova Via Marzolo 8 35131 Padova Italy INFN Sezione di Padova Via Marzolo 8 35131 Padova Italy Institute of Space and Astronautical Science Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency 3-1-1 Yoshinodai Chuo Sagamihara Kanagawa 252-5210 Japan Kanagawa University 3-27-1 Rokkakubashi Kanagawa Yokohama Kanagawa 221-8686 Japan Faculty of Science and Technology Graduate School of Science and Technology Hirosaki University 3 Bunkyo Hiros

We present the measurement of the energy dependence of the boron flux in cosmic rays and its ratio to the carbon flux in an energy interval from 8.4 GeV/n to 3.8 TeV/n based on the data collected by the Calorimetric Electron Telescope (CALET) during ∼6.4 yr of operation on the International Space Station. An update of the energy spectrum of carbon is also presented with an increase in statistics over our previous measurement. The observed boron flux shows a spectral hardening at the same transition energy E0∼200 GeV/n of the C spectrum, though B and C fluxes have different energy dependences. The spectral index of the B spectrum is found to be γ=−3.047±0.024 in the interval 25

关键词： Cosmic ray & astroparticle detectors Cosmic ray acceleration Cosmic ray composition & spectra Cosmic ray propagation Cosmic ray sources Cosmic rays & astroparticles

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Measurement of forward charged hadron flow harmonics in peripheral PbPb collisions at sNN=5.02TeV with the LHCb detector

引用

Physical Review C 2024年第5期109卷 054908-054908页

作者： R. Aaij A. S. W. Abdelmotteleb C. Abellan Beteta F. Abudinén T. Ackernley B. Adeva M. Adinolfi P. Adlarson C. Agapopoulou C. A. Aidala Z. Ajaltouni S. Akar K. Akiba P. Albicocco J. Albrecht F. Alessio M. Alexander A. Alfonso Albero Z. Aliouche P. Alvarez Cartelle R. Amalric S. Amato J. L. Amey Y. Amhis L. An L. Anderlini M. Andersson A. Andreianov P. Andreola M. Andreotti D. Andreou A. A. Anelli D. Ao F. Archilli M. Argenton S. Arguedas Cuendis A. Artamonov M. Artuso E. Aslanides M. Atzeni B. Audurier D. Bacher I. Bachiller Perea S. Bachmann M. Bachmayer J. J. Back A. Bailly-reyre P. Baladron Rodriguez V. Balagura W. Baldini J. Baptista de Souza Leite M. Barbetti I. R. Barbosa R. J. Barlow S. Barsuk W. Barter M. Bartolini F. Baryshnikov J. M. Basels G. Bassi B. Batsukh A. Battig A. Bay A. Beck M. Becker F. Bedeschi I. B. Bediaga A. Beiter S. Belin V. Bellee K. Belous I. Belov I. Belyaev G. Benane G. Bencivenni E. Ben-Haim A. Berezhnoy R. Bernet S. Bernet Andres H. C. Bernstein C. Bertella A. Bertolin C. Betancourt F. Betti J. Bex Ia. Bezshyiko J. Bhom M. S. Bieker N. V. Biesuz P. Billoir A. Biolchini M. Birch F. C. R. Bishop A. Bitadze A. Bizzeti M. P. Blago T. Blake F. Blanc J. E. Blank S. Blusk D. Bobulska V. Bocharnikov J. A. Boelhauve O. Boente Garcia T. Boettcher A. Bohare A. Boldyrev C. S. Bolognani R. Bolzonella N. Bondar F. Borgato S. Borghi M. Borsato J. T. Borsuk S. A. Bouchiba T. J. V. Bowcock A. Boyer C. Bozzi M. J. Bradley S. Braun A. Brea Rodriguez N. Breer J. Brodzicka A. Brossa Gonzalo J. Brown D. Brundu A. Buonaura L. Buonincontri A. T. Burke C. Burr A. Bursche A. Butkevich J. S. Butter J. Buytaert W. Byczynski S. Cadeddu H. Cai R. Calabrese L. Calefice S. Cali M. Calvi M. Calvo Gomez J. Cambon Bouzas P. Campana D. H. Campora Perez A. F. Campoverde Quezada S. Capelli L. Capriotti R. C. Caravaca Mora A. Carbone L. Carcedo Salgado R. Cardinale A. Cardini P. Carniti L. Carus A. Casais Vidal R. Caspary G. Casse J. Castro Godinez M. Cattaneo G. Cavallero V. Cavallini S. Celani J. Cerasoli D. Cervenkov Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam Netherlands Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom Physik-Institut Universität Zürich Zürich Switzerland Oliver Lodge Laboratory University of Liverpool Liverpool United Kingdom Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE) Universidade de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain H. H. Wills Physics Laboratory University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom Department of Physics and Astronomy Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden associated to European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Geneva Switzerland University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA associated to Université Clermont Auvergne CNRS/IN2P3 LPC Clermont-Ferrand France University of Cincinnati Cincinnati Ohio USA INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati Frascati Italy Fakultät Physik Technische Universität Dortmund Dortmund Germany School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom ICCUB Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom LPNHE Sorbonne Université Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris Cité CNRS/IN2P3 Paris France Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil Université Paris-Saclay CNRS/IN2P3 IJCLab Orsay France School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology Peking University Beijing China INFN Sezione di Firenze Firenze Italy Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN INFN Sezione di Ferrara Ferrara Italy Syracuse University Syracuse New York USA INFN Sezione di Milano-Bicocca Milano Italy University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China INFN Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata Roma Italy Consejo Nacional de Rectores (CONARE) San Jose Costa Rica Aix Marseille Univ CNRS/IN2P3 CPPM Marseille France Massachusetts Instit

Flow harmonic coefficients, vn, which are the key to studying the hydrodynamics of the quark-gluon plasma (QGP) created in heavy-ion collisions, have been measured in various collision systems and kinematic regions and using various particle species. The study of flow harmonics in a wide pseudorapidity range is particularly valuable to understand the temperature dependence of the shear viscosity to entropy density ratio of the QGP. This paper presents the first LHCb results of the second- and the third-order flow harmonic coefficients of charged hadrons as a function of transverse momentum in the forward region, corresponding to pseudorapidities between 2.0 and 4.9, using the data collected from PbPb collisions in 2018 at a center-of-mass energy of 5.02 TeV. The coefficients measured using the two-particle angular correlation analysis method are smaller than the central-pseudorapidity measurements at ALICE and ATLAS from the same collision system but share similar features.

关键词： Collective flow Quark-gluon plasma Relativistic heavy-ion collisions

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Benchmark problems for transcranial ultrasound simulation: Intercomparison of compressional wave models

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2022年

作者： Aubry, Jean-Francois Bates, Oscar Boehm, Christian Pauly, Kim Butts Christensen, Douglas Cueto, Carlos Gélat, Pierre Guasch, Lluis Jaros, Jiri Jing, Yun Jones, Rebecca Li, Ningrui Marty, Patrick Montanaro, Hazael Neufeld, Esra Pichardo, Samuel Pinton, Gianmarco Pulkkinen, Aki Stanziola, Antonio Thielscher, Axel Treeby, Bradley Van't Wout, Elwin Physics for Medicine Paris INSERM U1273 ESPCI Paris PSL University CNRS UMR 8063 France Department of Bioengineering Imperial College London Exhibition Road LondonSW7 2AZ United Kingdom Institute of Geophysics ETH Zürich Sonneggstrasse 5 Zürich8092 Switzerland Department of Radiology Stanford University StanfordCA United States Department of Biomedical Engineering Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Utah United States Department of Surgical Biotechnology Division of Surgery and Interventional Science University College London LondonNW3 2PF United Kingdom Earth Science and Engineering Department Imperial College London London United Kingdom Centre of Excellence IT4Innovations Faculty of Information Technology Brno University of Technology Bozetechova 2 Brno612 00 Czech Republic Graduate Program in Acoustics The Pennsylvania State University University Park PA16802 United States Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill North Carolina State University NC United States Department of Electrical Engineering Stanford University StanfordCA United States Zurich Switzerland Laboratory for Acoustics / Noise control Empa Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology Dubendorf Switzerland Zurich Switzerland Radiology and Clinical Neurosciences Departments Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Canada Department of Applied Physics University of Eastern Finland Kuopio70211 Finland Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering University College London Gower Street LondonWC1E 6BT United Kingdom Technical University of Denmark Denmark Danish Research Center for Magnetic Resonance Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre Denmark Institute for Mathematical and Computational Engineering School of Engineering and Faculty of Mathematics Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile Santiago Chile

Computational models of acoustic wave propagation are frequently used in transcranial ultrasound therapy, for example, to calculate the intracranial pressure field or to calculate phase delays to correct for skull distortions. To allow intercomparison between the different modeling tools and techniques used by the community, an international working group was convened to formulate a set of numerical benchmarks. Here, these benchmarks are presented, along with intercomparison results. Nine different benchmarks of increasing geometric complexity are defined. These include a single-layer planar bone immersed in water, a multi-layer bone, and a whole skull. Two transducer configurations are considered (a focused bowl and a plane piston), giving a total of 18 permutations of the benchmarks. Eleven different modeling tools are used to compute the benchmark results. The models span a wide range of numerical techniques, including the finite-difference time-domain method, angular-spectrum method, pseudospectral method, boundary-element method, and spectral-element method. Good agreement is found between the models, particularly for the position, size, and magnitude of the acoustic focus within the skull. When comparing results for each model with every other model in a cross comparison, the median values for each benchmark for the difference in focal pressure and position are less than 10% and 1 mm, respectively. The benchmark definitions, model results, and intercomparison codes are freely available to facilitate further comparisons. Copyright © 2022, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Bone

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Using pile-up collisions as an abundant source of low-energy hadronic physics processes in ATLAS and an extraction of the jet energy resolution

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2024年

作者： Aad, G. Aakvaag, E. Abbott, B. Abdelhameed, S. Abeling, K. Abicht, N.J. Abidi, S.H. Aboelela, M. Aboulhorma, A. Abramowicz, H. Abreu, H. Abulaiti, Y. Acharya, B.S. Ackermann, A. Bourdarios, C. Adam Adamczyk, L. Addepalli, S.V. Addison, M.J. Adelman, J. Adiguzel, A. Adye, T. Affolder, A.A. Afik, Y. Agaras, M.N. Agarwala, J. Aggarwal, A. Agheorghiesei, C. Ahmadov, F. Ahmed, W.S. Ahuja, S. Ai, X. Aielli, G. Aikot, A. Tamlihat, M. Ait Aitbenchikh, B. Akbiyik, M. Åkesson, T.P.A. Akimov, A.V. Akiyama, D. Akolkar, N.N. Aktas, S. Al Khoury, K. Alberghi, G.L. Albert, J. Albicocco, P. Albouy, G.L. Alderweireldt, S. Alegria, Z.L. Aleksa, M. Aleksandrov, I.N. Alexa, C. Alexopoulos, T. Alfonsi, F. Algren, M. Alhroob, M. Ali, B. Ali, H.M.J. Ali, S. Alibocus, S.W. Aliev, M. Alimonti, G. Alkakhi, W. Allaire, C. Allbrooke, B.M.M. Allen, J.S. Allen, J.F. Flores, C.A. Allendes Allport, P.P. Aloisio, A. Alonso, F. Alpigiani, C. Alsolami, Z.M.K. Estevez, M. Alvarez Fernandez, A. Alvarez Cardoso, M. Alves Alviggi, M.G. Aly, M. Coutinho, Y. Amaral Ambler, A. Amelung, C. Amerl, M. Ames, C.G. Amidei, D. Amini, B. Amirie, K.J. Dos Santos, S.P. Amor Amos, K.R. Amperiadou, D. An, S. Ananiev, V. Anastopoulos, C. Andeen, T. Anders, J.K. Anderson, A.C. Andrean, S.Y. Andreazza, A. Angelidakis, S. Angerami, A. Anisenkov, A.V. Annovi, A. Antel, C. Antipov, E. Antonelli, M. Anulli, F. Aoki, M. Aoki, T. Aparo, M.A. Bella, L. Aperio Appelt, C. Apyan, A. Val, S.J. Arbiol Arcangeletti, C. Arce, A.T.H. Arguin, J.-F. Argyropoulos, S. Arling, J.-H. Arnaez, O. Arnold, H. Artoni, G. Asada, H. Asai, K. Asai, S. Asbah, N.A. Pickering, R.A. Ashby Assamagan, K. Astalos, R. Astrand, K.S.V. Atashi, S. Atkin, R.J. Atkinson, M. Atmani, H. Atmasiddha, P.A. Augsten, K. Auricchio, S. Auriol, A.D. Austrup, V.A. Avolio, G. Axiotis, K. Azuelos, G. Babal, D. Bachacou, H. Bachas, K. Bachiu, A. Backman, F. Badea, A. Baer, T.M. Bagnaia, P. Bahmani, M. Bahner, D. Bai, K. Baines, J.T. Department of Physics University of Adelaide Adelaide Australia Department of Physics University of Alberta EdmontonAB Canada Department of Physics Ankara University Ankara Turkey Division of Physics TOBB University of Economics and Technology Ankara Turkey LAPP Université Savoie Mont Blanc CNRS/IN2P3 Annecy France APC Université Paris Cité CNRS/IN2P3 Paris France High Energy Physics Division Argonne National Laboratory ArgonneIL United States Department of Physics University of Arizona TucsonAZ United States Department of Physics University of Texas at Arlington ArlingtonTX United States Physics Department National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece Physics Department National Technical University of Athens Zografou Greece Department of Physics University of Texas at Austin AustinTX United States Institute of Physics Azerbaijan Academy of Sciences Baku Azerbaijan Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology Barcelona Spain Institute of High Energy Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China Physics Department Tsinghua University Beijing China Institute of Physics University of Belgrade Belgrade Serbia Department for Physics and Technology University of Bergen Bergen Norway Physics Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory BerkeleyCA United States University of California BerkeleyCA United States Institut für Physik Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germany Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics and Laboratory for High Energy Physics University of Bern Bern Switzerland School of Physics and Astronomy University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom Department of Physics Bogazici University Istanbul Turkey Department of Physics Engineering Gaziantep University Gaziantep Turkey Department of Physics Istanbul University Istanbul Turkey Facultad de Ciencias y Centro de Investigaciónes Universidad Antonio Nariño Bogotá Colombia Departamento de Física Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bo

During the 2015–2018 data-taking period, the Large Hadron Collider delivered proton–proton bunch crossings at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV to the ATLAS experiment at a rate of roughly 30 MHz, where each bunch crossing contained an average of 34 independent inelastic proton–proton collisions. The ATLAS trigger system selected roughly 1 kHz of these bunch crossings to be recorded to disk. Offline algorithms then identify one of the recorded collisions as the collision of interest for subsequent data analysis, and the remaining collisions are referred to as pile-up. Pile-up collisions represent a trigger-unbiased dataset, which is evaluated to have an integrated luminosity of 1.33 pb−1 in 2015–2018. This is small compared with the normal trigger-based ATLAS dataset, but when combined with vertex-by-vertex jet reconstruction it provides up to 50 times more dijet events than the conventional single-jet-trigger-based approach, and does so without adding any additional cost or requirements on the trigger system, readout, or storage. The pile-up dataset is validated through comparisons with a special trigger-unbiased dataset recorded by ATLAS, and its utility is demonstrated by means of a measurement of the jet energy resolution in dijet events, where the statistical uncertainty is significantly reduced for jet transverse momenta below 65 GeV. © 2024, CC BY.

关键词： Uncertainty analysis

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Cubic action in double field theory

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2021年

作者： Ma, Chen-Te Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Science Institute of Quantum Matter South China Normal University Guangzhou Guangdong510006 China School of Physics and Telecommunication Engineering South China Normal University Guangzhou Guangdong510006 China Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory of Quantum Matter Southern Nuclear Science Computing Center South China Normal University Guangzhou Guangdong510006 China Laboratory for Quantum Gravity and Strings Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics University of Cape Town Private Bag Rondebosch7700 South Africa Department of Physics and Center for Theoretical Sciences National Taiwan University Taipei10617 Taiwan

We study target space theory on a torus for the states with NL+ NR= 2 through Double Field Theory. The spin-two Fierz-Pauli fields are not allowed when all spatial dimensions are non-compact. The massive states provide both non-vanishing momentum and winding numbers in the target space theory. To derive the cubic action, we provide the unique constraint for NL≠ NRcompatible with the integration by part. We first make a correspondence of massive and massless fields. The quadratic action is gauge invariant by introducing the mass term. We then proceed to the cubic order. The cubic action is also gauge invariant by introducing the coupling between the one-form field and other fields. The massive states do not follow the consistent truncation. One should expect the self-consistent theory by summing over infinite modes. Hence the naive expectation is wrong up to the cubic order. In the end, we show that the momentum and winding modes cannot both appear for only one compact doubled space. Copyright © 2021, The Authors. All rights reserved.

关键词： Gages

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Accuracy versus precision in boosted top tagging with the ATLAS detector

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2024年

作者： Aad, G. Aakvaag, E. Abbott, B. Abdelhameed, S. Abeling, K. Abicht, N.J. Abidi, S.H. Aboelela, M. Aboulhorma, A. Abramowicz, H. Abreu, H. Abulaiti, Y. Acharya, B.S. Ackermann, A. Bourdarios, C. Adam Adamczyk, L. Addepalli, S.V. Addison, M.J. Adelman, J. Adiguzel, A. Adye, T. Affolder, A.A. Afik, Y. Agaras, M.N. Agarwala, J. Aggarwal, A. Agheorghiesei, C. Ahmadov, F. Ahmed, W.S. Ahuja, S. Ai, X. Aielli, G. Aikot, A. Tamlihat, M. Ait Aitbenchikh, B. Akbiyik, M. Åkesson, T.P.A. Akimov, A.V. Akiyama, D. Akolkar, N.N. Aktas, S. Al Khoury, K. Alberghi, G.L. Albert, J. Albicocco, P. Albouy, G.L. Alderweireldt, S. Alegria, Z.L. Aleksa, M. Aleksandrov, I.N. Alexa, C. Alexopoulos, T. Alfonsi, F. Algren, M. Alhroob, M. Ali, B. Ali, H.M.J. Ali, S. Alibocus, S.W. Aliev, M. Alimonti, G. Alkakhi, W. Allaire, C. Allbrooke, B.M.M. Allen, J.F. Flores, C.A. Allendes Allport, P.P. Aloisio, A. Alonso, F. Alpigiani, C. Alsolami, Z.M.K. Estevez, M. Alvarez Fernandez, A. Alvarez Cardoso, M. Alves Alviggi, M.G. Aly, M. Coutinho, Y. Amaral Ambler, A. Amelung, C. Amerl, M. Ames, C.G. Amidei, D. Amini, B. Amirie, K.J. Dos Santos, S.P. Amor Amos, K.R. An, S. Ananiev, V. Anastopoulos, C. Andeen, T. Anders, J.K. Anderson, A.C. Andrean, S.Y. Andreazza, A. Angelidakis, S. Angerami, A. Anisenkov, A.V. Annovi, A. Antel, C. Antipov, E. Antonelli, M. Anulli, F. Aoki, M. Aoki, T. Aparo, M.A. Bella, L. Aperio Appelt, C. Apyan, A. Val, S.J. Arbiol Arcangeletti, C. Arce, A.T.H. Arguin, J.-F. Argyropoulos, S. Arling, J.-H. Arnaez, O. Arnold, H. Artoni, G. Asada, H. Asai, K. Asai, S. Asbah, N.A. Pickering, R.A. Ashby Assamagan, K. Astalos, R. Astrand, K.S.V. Atashi, S. Atkin, R.J. Atkinson, M. Atmani, H. Atmasiddha, P.A. Augsten, K. Auricchio, S. Auriol, A.D. Austrup, V.A. Avolio, G. Axiotis, K. Azuelos, G. Babal, D. Bachacou, H. Bachas, K. Bachiu, A. Backman, F. Badea, A. Baer, T.M. Bagnaia, P. Bahmani, M. Bahner, D. Bai, K. Baines, J.T. Baines, L. Baker, O.K. Department of Physics University of Adelaide Adelaide Australia Department of Physics University of Alberta EdmontonAB Canada Department of Physics Ankara University Ankara Turkey Division of Physics TOBB University of Economics and Technology Ankara Turkey LAPP Université Savoie Mont Blanc CNRS/IN2P3 Annecy France APC Université Paris Cité CNRS/IN2P3 Paris France High Energy Physics Division Argonne National Laboratory ArgonneIL United States Department of Physics University of Arizona TucsonAZ United States Department of Physics University of Texas at Arlington ArlingtonTX United States Physics Department National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece Physics Department National Technical University of Athens Zografou Greece Department of Physics University of Texas at Austin AustinTX United States Institute of Physics Azerbaijan Academy of Sciences Baku Azerbaijan Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology Barcelona Spain Institute of High Energy Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China Physics Department Tsinghua University Beijing China Institute of Physics University of Belgrade Belgrade Serbia Department for Physics and Technology University of Bergen Bergen Norway Physics Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory BerkeleyCA United States University of California BerkeleyCA United States Institut für Physik Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germany Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics Laboratory for High Energy Physics University of Bern Bern Switzerland School of Physics and Astronomy University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom Department of Physics Bogazici University Istanbul Turkey Department of Physics Engineering Gaziantep University Gaziantep Turkey Department of Physics Istanbul University Istanbul Turkey Facultad de Ciencias y Centro de Investigaciónes Universidad Antonio Nariño Bogotá Colombia Departamento de Física Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogot

The identification of top quark decays where the top quark has a large momentum transverse to the beam axis, known as top tagging, is a crucial component in many measurements of Standard Model processes and searches for beyond the Standard Model physics at the Large Hadron Collider. Machine learning techniques have improved the performance of top tagging algorithms, but the size of the systematic uncertainties for all proposed algorithms has not been systematically studied. This paper presents the performance of several machine learning based top tagging algorithms on a dataset constructed from simulated proton–proton collision events measured with the ATLAS detector at √s = 13 TeV. The systematic uncertainties associated with these algorithms are estimated through an approximate procedure that is not meant to be used in a physics analysis, but is appropriate for the level of precision required for this study. The most performant algorithms are found to have the largest uncertainties, motivating the development of methods to reduce these uncertainties without compromising performance. To enable such efforts in the wider scientific community, the datasets used in this paper are made publicly available. © 2024, CC BY.

关键词： Hadrons

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Differential cross-section measurements of Higgs boson production in the H → τ+τ− decay channel in p p collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2024年

作者： Aad, G. Aakvaag, E. Abbott, B. Abdelhameed, S. Abeling, K. Abicht, N.J. Abidi, S.H. Aboelela, M. Aboulhorma, A. Abramowicz, H. Abreu, H. Abulaiti, Y. Acharya, B.S. Ackermann, A. Bourdarios, C. Adam Adamczyk, L. Addepalli, S.V. Addison, M.J. Adelman, J. Adiguzel, A. Adye, T. Affolder, A.A. Afik, Y. Agaras, M.N. Agarwala, J. Aggarwal, A. Agheorghiesei, C. Ahmadov, F. Ahmed, W.S. Ahuja, S. Ai, X. Aielli, G. Aikot, A. Tamlihat, M. Ait Aitbenchikh, B. Akbiyik, M. Åkesson, T.P.A. Akimov, A.V. Akiyama, D. Akolkar, N.N. Aktas, S. Al Khoury, K. Alberghi, G.L. Albert, J. Albicocco, P. Albouy, G.L. Alderweireldt, S. Alegria, Z.L. Aleksa, M. Aleksandrov, I.N. Alexa, C. Alexopoulos, T. Alfonsi, F. Algren, M. Alhroob, M. Ali, B. Ali, H.M.J. Ali, S. Alibocus, S.W. Aliev, M. Alimonti, G. Alkakhi, W. Allaire, C. Allbrooke, B.M.M. Allen, J.S. Allen, J.F. Flores, C.A. Allendes Allport, P.P. Aloisio, A. Alonso, F. Alpigiani, C. Alsolami, Z.M.K. Estevez, M. Alvarez Fernandez, A. Alvarez Cardoso, M. Alves Alviggi, M.G. Aly, M. Coutinho, Y. Amaral Ambler, A. Amelung, C. Amerl, M. Ames, C.G. Amidei, D. Amini, B. Amirie, K.J. Dos Santos, S.P. Amor Amos, K.R. Amperiadou, D. An, S. Ananiev, V. Anastopoulos, C. Andeen, T. Anders, J.K. Anderson, A.C. Andrean, S.Y. Andreazza, A. Angelidakis, S. Angerami, A. Anisenkov, A.V. Annovi, A. Antel, C. Antipov, E. Antonelli, M. Anulli, F. Aoki, M. Aoki, T. Aparo, M.A. Bella, L. Aperio Appelt, C. Apyan, A. Val, S.J. Arbiol Arcangeletti, C. Arce, A.T.H. Arguin, J.-F. Argyropoulos, S. Arling, J.-H. Arnaez, O. Arnold, H. Artoni, G. Asada, H. Asai, K. Asai, S. Asbah, N.A. Pickering, R.A. Ashby Assamagan, K. Astalos, R. Astrand, K.S.V. Atashi, S. Atkin, R.J. Atkinson, M. Atmani, H. Atmasiddha, P.A. Augsten, K. Auricchio, S. Auriol, A.D. Austrup, V.A. Avolio, G. Axiotis, K. Azuelos, G. Babal, D. Bachacou, H. Bachas, K. Bachiu, A. Backman, F. Badea, A. Baer, T.M. Bagnaia, P. Bahmani, M. Bahner, D. Bai, K. Baines, J.T. Department of Physics University of Adelaide Adelaide Australia Department of Physics University of Alberta EdmontonAB Canada Department of Physics Ankara University Ankara Turkey Division of Physics TOBB University of Economics and Technology Ankara Turkey LAPP Université Savoie Mont Blanc CNRS/IN2P3 Annecy France APC Université Paris Cité CNRS/IN2P3 Paris France High Energy Physics Division Argonne National Laboratory ArgonneIL United States Department of Physics University of Arizona TucsonAZ United States Department of Physics University of Texas at Arlington ArlingtonTX United States Physics Department National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece Physics Department National Technical University of Athens Zografou Greece Department of Physics University of Texas at Austin AustinTX United States Institute of Physics Azerbaijan Academy of Sciences Baku Azerbaijan Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology Barcelona Spain Institute of High Energy Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China Physics Department Tsinghua University Beijing China Institute of Physics University of Belgrade Belgrade Serbia Department for Physics and Technology University of Bergen Bergen Norway Physics Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory BerkeleyCA United States University of California BerkeleyCA United States Institut für Physik Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germany Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics Laboratory for High Energy Physics University of Bern Bern Switzerland School of Physics and Astronomy University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom Department of Physics Bogazici University Istanbul Turkey Department of Physics Engineering Gaziantep University Gaziantep Turkey Department of Physics Istanbul University Istanbul Turkey Facultad de Ciencias y Centro de Investigaciónes Universidad Antonio Nariño Bogotá Colombia Departamento de Física Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogot

Differential measurements of Higgs boson production in the τ-lepton-pair decay channel are presented in the gluon fusion, vector-boson fusion (VBF), VH and tt¯H associated production modes, with particular focus on the VBF production mode. The data used to perform the measurements correspond to 140 fb−1 of proton–proton collisions collected by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. Two methods are used to perform the measurements: the Simplified Template Cross-Section (STXS) approach and an Unfolded Fiducial Differential measurement considering only the VBF phase space. For the STXS measurement, events are categorized by their production mode and kinematic properties such as the Higgs boson’s transverse momentum (pTH), the number of jets produced in association with the Higgs boson, or the invariant mass of the two leading jets (mj j). For the VBF production mode, the ratio of the measured cross-section to the Standard Model prediction for(Formula presented). This is the first VBF measurement for the higher-pTH criteria, and the most precise for the lower-pTH criteria. The fiducial cross-section measurements, which only consider the kinematic properties of the event, are performed as functions of variables characterizing the VBF topology, such as the signed Δj j between the two leading jets. The measurements have a precision of 30%–50% and agree well with the Standard Model predictions. These results are interpreted in the SMEFT framework, and place the strongest constraints to date on the CP-odd Wilson coefficient cHW˜ © 2024, CC BY.

关键词： Kinematics

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

The Real Time Analysis framework of the Cherenkov Telescope Array's Large-Sized Telescope

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2023年

作者： Caroff, Sami Aubert, Pierre Garcia, Enrique Maurin, Gilles Pollet, Vincent Vuillaume, Thomas Abe, K. Abe, S. Aguasca-Cabot, A. Agudo, I. Alvarez Crespo, N. Antonelli, L.A. Aramo, C. Arbet-Engels, A. Arcaro, C. Artero, M. Asano, K. Baktash, A. Bamba, A. Baquero Larriva, A. Baroncelli, L. Barres de Almeida, U. Barrio, J.A. Batkovic, I. Baxter, J. Becerra González, J. Bernardini, E. Bernardos, M.I. Bernete Medrano, J. Berti, A. Bhattacharjee, P. Biederbeck, N. Bigongiari, C. Bissaldi, E. Blanch, O. Bonnoli, G. Bordas, P. Bulgarelli, A. Burelli, I. Burmistrov, L. Buscemi, M. Cardillo, M. Carosi, A. Carrasco, M.S. Cassol, F. Cauz, D. Cerasole, D. Ceribella, G. Chai, Y. Cheng, K. Chiavassa, A. Chikawa, M. Chytka, L. Cifuentes, A. Contreras, J.L. Cortina, J. Costantini, H. Dalchenko, M. Dazzi, F. De Angelis, A. de Bony de Lavergne, M. De Lotto, B. De Lucia, M. de Menezes, R. Del Peral, L. Deleglise, G. Delgado, C. Delgado Mengual, J. della Volpe, D. Dellaiera, M. Di Piano, A. Di Pierro, F. Di Pilato, A. Di Tria, R. Di Venere, L. Díaz, C. Dominik, R.M. Dominis Prester, D. Donini, A. Dorner, D. Doro, M. Eisenberger, L. Elsässer, D. Emery, G. Escudero, J. Fallah Ramazani, V. Ferrara, G. Ferrarotto, F. Fiasson, A. Foffano, L. Freixas Coromina, L. Fröse, S. Fukami, S. Fukazawa, Y. Garcia López, R. Gasbarra, C. Gasparrini, D. Geyer, D. Giesbrecht Paiva, J. Giglietto, N. Giordano, F. Gliwny, P. Godinovic, N. Grau, R. Green, J. Green, D. Gunji, S. Günther, P. Hackfeld, J. Hadasch, D. Hahn, A. Hashiyama, K. Hassan, T. Hayashi, K. Heckmann, L. Heller, M. Herrera Llorente, J. Hirotani, K. Hoffmann, D. Horns, D. Houles, J. Hrabovsky, M. Hrupec, D. Hui, D. Hütten, M. Iarlori, M. Imazawa, R. Inada, T. Inome, Y. Ioka, K. Iori, M. Ishio, K. Jimenez Martinez, I. Jurysek, J. Kagaya, M. Karas, V. Katagiri, H. Kataoka, J. Kerszberg, D. Kobayashi, Y. Kohri, K. Kong, A. Kubo, H. Kushida, J. Lainez, M. Lamanna, G. Lamastra, A. Le Flour, T. Linhoff, M. Longo, F. López-Coto, R. López-Oramas, A. Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc CNRS Laboratoire d'Annecy de Physique des Particules - IN2P3 Annecy74000 France Department of Physics Tokai University Japan Institute for Cosmic Ray Research University of Tokyo Japan Departament de Física Quàntica i Astrofísica Institut de Ciències del Cosmos Universitat de Barcelona IEEC-UB Spain Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía-CSIC Spain EMFTEL department IPARCOS Universidad Complutense de Madrid Spain INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma Italy INFN Sezione di Napoli Italy Max-Planck-Institut für Physik Germany INFN Sezione di Padova Università degli Studi di Padova Italy The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology Spain Universität Hamburg Institut für Experimentalphysik Germany Graduate School of Science University of Tokyo Japan Universidad del Azuay Ecuador INAF - Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello spazio di Bologna Italy Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas Brazil Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias Departamento de Astrofísica Universidad de La Laguna Spain CIEMAT Spain Department of Physics TU Dortmund University Germany INFN Sezione di Bari Politecnico di Bari Italy INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera Italy INFN Sezione di Trieste Università degli Studi di Udine Italy University of Geneva Département de physique nucléaire et corpusculaire Switzerland INFN Sezione di Catania Italy Italy Aix Marseille Univ CNRS IN2P3 CPPM France INFN Sezione di Bari Università di Bari Italy INFN Sezione di Torino Italy Palacky University Olomouc Faculty of Science Czech Republic University of Alcalá UAH Spain Port d'Informació Científica Spain University of Rijeka Department of Physics Croatia Institute for Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics Universität Würzburg Germany Institut für Theoretische Physik Lehrstuhl IV: Plasma-Astroteilchenphysik Ruhr-Universität Bochum Germany INFN Sezione di Roma La Sapienza Italy ILANCE CNRS Japan Physics Program Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineerin

The Large-Sized Telescopes (LSTs) of the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory (CTAO) will play a crucial role in the study of transient gamma-ray sources, such as gamma-ray bursts and flaring active galactic nuclei. The low energy threshold of LSTs makes them particularly well suited for the detection of these phenomena. The ability to detect and analyze gamma-ray transients in real-time is essential for quickly identifying and studying these rare and fleeting events. In this conference, we will present recent advances in the real-time analysis of data from the LST-1, the first prototype of LST located in the Canary island of La Palma. We will discuss in particular the development of new algorithms for event reconstruction and background rejection. These advances will enable rapid identification and follow-up observation of transient gamma-ray sources, making the LST-1 a powerful tool for the study of the dynamic universe. The implementation of this framework in the future Array Control and Data Acquisition System (ACADA) of CTAO will be discussed as well, based on the experience with LST. © 2023, CC BY.

关键词： Telescopes

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

Search for the jet-induced diffusion wake in the quark-gluon plasma via measurements of jet–track correlations in photon–jet events in Pb+Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2024年

This paper presents a measurement of jet–track correlations in photon–jet events, using 1.72 nb−1 of Pb+Pb data at √sNN = 5.02 TeV recorded with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Events with energetic photon–jet pairs are selected, where the photon and jet are approximately back-to-back in azimuth. The angular correlation between jets and charged-particle tracks with transverse momentum (pT) in the range 0.5–2.0 GeV in the hemisphere opposite to the jet, |Δ(jet,track)| > π/2, is measured as a function of their relative pseudorapidity difference, |Δη(jet,track)|. In central Pb+Pb collisions, these correlations are predicted to be sensitive to the diffusion wake in the quark-gluon plasma resulting from the lost energy of high-pT partons traversing the plasma, with a characteristic modification as a function of |Δη(jet,track)|. The correlations are examined with different selections on the jet-to-photon pT ratio to select events with different degrees of energy loss. No diffusion wake signal is observed within the current sensitivity and upper limits at 95% confidence level on the diffusion wake amplitude are reported. © 2024, CC BY.

关键词： Photons

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

A search for R-parity violating supersymmetric decays of the top squark to a b-jet and a lepton in √s = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector

arXiv

引用

arXiv 2024年

作者： Aad, G. Aakvaag, E. Abbott, B. Abdelhameed, S. Abeling, K. Abicht, N.J. Abidi, S.H. Aboelela, M. Aboulhorma, A. Abramowicz, H. Abreu, H. Abulaiti, Y. Acharya, B.S. Ackermann, A. Bourdarios, C. Adam Adamczyk, L. Addepalli, S.V. Addison, M.J. Adelman, J. Adiguzel, A. Adye, T. Affolder, A.A. Afik, Y. Agaras, M.N. Agarwala, J. Aggarwal, A. Agheorghiesei, C. Ahmadov, F. Ahmed, W.S. Ahuja, S. Ai, X. Aielli, G. Aikot, A. Tamlihat, M. Ait Aitbenchikh, B. Akbiyik, M. Åkesson, T.P.A. Akimov, A.V. Akiyama, D. Akolkar, N.N. Aktas, S. Khoury, K. Al Alberghi, G.L. Albert, J. Albicocco, P. Albouy, G.L. Alderweireldt, S. Alegria, Z.L. Aleksa, M. Aleksandrov, I.N. Alexa, C. Alexopoulos, T. Alfonsi, F. Algren, M. Alhroob, M. Ali, B. Ali, H.M.J. Ali, S. Alibocus, S.W. Aliev, M. Alimonti, G. Alkakhi, W. Allaire, C. Allbrooke, B.M.M. Allen, J.F. Flores, C.A. Allendes Allport, P.P. Aloisio, A. Alonso, F. Alpigiani, C. Alsolami, Z.M.K. Estevez, M. Alvarez Fernandez, A. Alvarez Cardoso, M. Alves Alviggi, M.G. Aly, M. Coutinho, Y. Amaral Ambler, A. Amelung, C. Amerl, M. Ames, C.G. Amidei, D. Amini, B. Amirie, K.J. Dos Santos, S.P. Amor Amos, K.R. Amperiadou, D. An, S. Ananiev, V. Anastopoulos, C. Andeen, T. Anders, J.K. Anderson, A.C. Andrean, S.Y. Andreazza, A. Angelidakis, S. Angerami, A. Anisenkov, A.V. Annovi, A. Antel, C. Antipov, E. Antonelli, M. Anulli, F. Aoki, M. Aoki, T. Aparo, M.A. Bella, L. Aperio Appelt, C. Apyan, A. Val, S.J. Arbiol Arcangeletti, C. Arce, A.T.H. Arguin, J.-F. Argyropoulos, S. Arling, J.-H. Arnaez, O. Arnold, H. Artoni, G. Asada, H. Asai, K. Asai, S. Asbah, N.A. Pickering, R.A. Ashby Assamagan, K. Astalos, R. Astrand, K.S.V. Atashi, S. Atkin, R.J. Atkinson, M. Atmani, H. Atmasiddha, P.A. Augsten, K. Auricchio, S. Auriol, A.D. Austrup, V.A. Avolio, G. Axiotis, K. Azuelos, G. Babal, D. Bachacou, H. Bachas, K. Bachiu, A. Backman, F. Badea, A. Baer, T.M. Bagnaia, P. Bahmani, M. Bahner, D. Bai, K. Baines, J.T. Baines, L. Department of Physics University of Adelaide Adelaide Australia Department of Physics University of Alberta EdmontonAB Canada Department of Physics Ankara University Ankara Turkey Division of Physics TOBB University of Economics and Technology Ankara Turkey LAPP Université Savoie Mont Blanc CNRS/IN2P3 Annecy France APC Université Paris Cité CNRS/IN2P3 Paris France High Energy Physics Division Argonne National Laboratory ArgonneIL United States Department of Physics University of Arizona TucsonAZ United States Department of Physics University of Texas at Arlington ArlingtonTX United States Physics Department National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece Physics Department National Technical University of Athens Zografou Greece Department of Physics University of Texas at Austin AustinTX United States Institute of Physics Azerbaijan Academy of Sciences Baku Azerbaijan Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology Barcelona Spain Institute of High Energy Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China Physics Department Tsinghua University Beijing China Institute of Physics University of Belgrade Belgrade Serbia Department for Physics and Technology University of Bergen Bergen Norway Physics Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory BerkeleyCA United States University of California BerkeleyCA United States Institut für Physik Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germany Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics Laboratory for High Energy Physics University of Bern Bern Switzerland School of Physics and Astronomy University of Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom Department of Physics Bogazici University Istanbul Turkey Department of Physics Engineering Gaziantep University Gaziantep Turkey Department of Physics Istanbul University Istanbul Turkey Facultad de Ciencias y Centro de Investigaciónes Universidad Antonio Nariño Bogotá Colombia Departamento de Física Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogot

A search is presented for direct pair production of the stop, the supersymmetric partner of the top quark, in a decay through an R-parity violating coupling to a charged lepton and a b-quark. The dataset corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 140 fb−1 of proton–proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of √s = 13 TeV collected between 2015 and 2018 by the ATLAS detector at the LHC. The final state has two charged leptons (electrons or muons) and two b-jets. The results of the search are interpreted in the context of a Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model with an additional B − L gauge symmetry that is spontaneously broken. No significant excess is observed over the Standard Model background and exclusion limits on stop pair production are set at 95% confidence level. The corresponding lower limits on the stop mass for 100% branching ratios to a b-quark and an electron, muon, or tau-lepton are 1.9 TeV, 1.8 TeV and 800 GeV, respectively, extending the reach of previous LHC searches. © 2024, CC BY.

关键词： Supersymmetry

来源：评论

学校读者我要写书评

暂无评论

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：

通借通还

建议与咨询 留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

时间限定

文献类型

馆藏选择

核心期刊

语言

文献类型

帮助

文字说明：

检索规则说明：

检索范例：

分类表

所选分类

限定检索结果

文献类型

馆藏范围

日期分布

学科分类号

主题

机构

作者

语言

请选择保存的检索档案： 新增检索档案 确定 取消

请选择收藏分类： 新增自定义分类 确定 取消

通借通还

建议与咨询留下您的常用邮箱和电话号码，以便我们向您反馈解决方案和替代方法

请选择保存的检索档案：

请选择收藏分类：